Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Sep 23;10(11):660. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.221-c1

ALS—dying forward, backward or outward?

Mark R Baker 1
PMCID: PMC4221249  EMSID: EMS60793  PMID: 25245152

Heiko Braak and colleagues (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—a model of corticofugal axonal spread. Nature Rev. Neurol. 9, 708–714; 2013)1 present impressively detailed evidence in support of corticofugal spread – also known as the ‘dying-forward’ model of neurodegeneration, first proposed by Eisen and Weber2 - in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Here, I propose a refinement that integrates both the ‘dying-forward’ and ‘dying-back’3 models: the corticofugal synaptopathy, or, ‘dying-outward’ hypothesis.

In any model of ALS, a number of fundamental features have to be reconciled: First, degenerative changes occur primarily in anterior horn cells and brainstem motoneurons that receive monosynaptic connections from motor cortex,4 and in the corticospinal tract neurons within primary motor cortex. Second, in some variants of ALS, the disease only affects the corticospinal tract neurons5, whereas in other variants, it only affects anterior horn cells, or affects corticospinal tract neurons only very late in the disease6. Third, ALS progresses contiguously between spinal, brainstem and cortical regions, in what has been termed a ‘prion-like’ pattern7. Fourth, cortical areas involved late in the disease are linked via long-range synaptic connections1. Last, humans are the only species affected by sporadic ALS and only nonhuman primate models of ALS have recapitulated features of the disease observed in humans8.

An important component of the corticofugal model1 is the axonal transport hypothesis, which identifies the importance of long-range axonal connections in disease propagation, but overlooks the synapse—the very reason for the existence of such connections. Not only does the developing synapse, or growth cone, function independently9 but there is also evidence that synaptic autonomy continues into adulthood10. For example, synaptic prion-like proteins maintain activity-dependent changes in synaptic efficacy independently of nuclear transcription within neuronal somata. Furthermore, mitochondria, essential for calcium buffering and energy, are maintained autonomously within the presynaptic and postsynaptic compartments11. Such autonomy permits efficient long-distance neuronal communication, but there is a trade-off: the lysosomal housekeeping processes responsible for recycling biomolecules, organelles and cellular debris located within the distant soma function less efficiently. Consequently, abnormal conformational changes in prion-like proteins can replicate and propagate without control and dysfunctional mitochondria accumulate10, 11. The longer the axon and the larger the synapse, the more likely this autonomous process is to malfunction, hence the susceptibility of the monosynaptic cortico-motoneuronal synapse at the onset of ALS in man.

The cortico-motoneuronal synapse is a feature that distinguishes primates from other mammalian species, and the number of corticomotoneuronal synapses and length of axons in the corticospinal tract that distinguish humans from nonhuman primates12. Mutations in mitochondrial DNA have been implicated in motor neuron diseases13 and ALS14, and there is increasing evidence that the interaction between pathological synaptic mitochondria and synaptic prion proteins leads to neurodegeneration11. The cortico-motoneuronal synapse, therefore, is not only pivotal as the link between the corticospinal tract and anterior horn cells but also; because of its vulnerability, it is an efficient nidus for neurodegeneration. Consequently, biomarkers that can detect changes in the integrity of the cortico-motoneuronal synapse15 should be able to identify the very earliest stages of ALS, enabling early disease-modifying therapeutic interventions at a stage when they can make a significant impact on survival in this dreadful disease.

Footnotes

Competing interests: The author declares no competing interests

References

  • 1.Braak H, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a model of corticofugal axonal spread. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2013;9:708–14. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eisen A, Weber M. The motor cortex and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle & Nerve. 2001;24:564–73. doi: 10.1002/mus.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chou SM, Norris FH. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: lower motor neuron disease spreading to upper motor neurons. Muscle & Nerve. 1993;16:864–9. doi: 10.1002/mus.880160810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hudson AJ, Kiernan JN. Preservation of certain voluntary muscles in motoneurone disease. Lancet. 1988;1:652–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91455-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pringle CE, et al. Primary lateral sclerosis. Clinical features, neuropathology and diagnostic criteria. Brain. 1992;115(Pt 2):495–520. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.2.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ince PG, et al. Corticospinal tract degeneration in the progressive muscular atrophy variant of ALS. Neurology. 2003;60:1252–8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000058901.75728.4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanouchi T, Ohkubo T, Yokota T. Can regional spreading of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis motor symptoms be explained by prion-like propagation? Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2012;83:739–45. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Uchida A, et al. Non-human primate model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with cytoplasmic mislocalization of TDP-43. Brain. 2012;135:833–46. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kater SB, Rehder V. The sensory-motor role of growth cone filopodia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1995;5:68–74. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80089-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Raveendra BL, et al. Characterization of prion-like conformational changes of the neuronal isoform of Aplysia CPEB. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2013;20:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Siskova Z, et al. Morphological and functional abnormalities in mitochondria associated with synaptic degeneration in prion disease. American Journal of Pathology. 2010;177:1411–21. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lemon RN. Descending pathways in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2008;31:195–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dion PA, Daoud H, Rouleau GA. Genetics of motor neuron disorders: new insights into pathogenic mechanisms. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2009;10:769–82. doi: 10.1038/nrg2680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Borthwick GM, et al. Motor neuron disease in a patient with a mitochondrial tRNAIle mutation. Annals of Neurology. 2006;59:570–4. doi: 10.1002/ana.20758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fisher KM, Zaaimi B, Williams TL, Baker SN, Baker MR. Beta-band intermuscular coherence: a novel biomarker of upper motor neuron dysfunction in motor neuron disease. Brain. 2012;135:2849–64. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES