Abstract
Background
Physical activity has been associated with reduced risk of breast cancer. Evidence on the association in African Americans is limited.
Methods
With prospective data from the Black Women's Health Study, we assessed vigorous exercise and walking in relation to incidence of invasive breast cancer overall (n=1,364), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+, n=688) cancer, and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-, n=405) cancer, based on 307,672 person years of follow-up of 44,708 African American women aged 30 or older at enrollment. Cox proportional hazards models estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Vigorous exercise at baseline was inversely associated with overall breast cancer incidence (p trend = 0.05): the IRR for ≥7 hour/week relative to <1 hour/week was 0.74 (95% CI 0.57-0.96). The association did not differ by ER status. Brisk walking for ≥7 hours/week was associated with a reduction similar to that for vigorous exercise. Vigorous exercise at age 30, age 21, or in high school was not associated with breast cancer incidence. Sitting for long periods at work or watching TV was not significantly associated with breast cancer incidence.
Conclusion
High levels of vigorous exerciseor brisk walking may be associated with a reduction in incidence of breast cancer in African American women.
Impact
These results provide informative data on a potential modifiable risk factor, exercise, for breast cancer in African American women.
Introduction
Many studies, mostly of white women, have found associations of various types of physical activity with reduced risk of breast cancer (1-5). The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research expert panel concluded in 2007 that an inverse association of physical activity with postmenopausal breast cancer was probable (4), based on evidence from both follow-up and case-control studies. Their conclusion on premenopausal breast cancer was that there was limited evidence for an inverse association. With the addition of newly reported studies, their conclusions in 2010 were unchanged; for premenopausal breast cancer, in particular, the evidence from follow-up studies was judged to be inconsistent, while that from case-control studies suggested an inverse association (5). The optimal type of physical activity, time period, and amount of activity are not established. In a meta-analysis of 31 prospective studies of physical activity and breast cancer that assessed a variety of activity measures, an overall reduction in risk of approximately 12% was estimated for the highest level of recreational physical activity relative to the lowest, and associations were strongest for vigorous recreational activity (6).
The results of the few studies of physical activity and breast cancer among African American women are inconsistent (7-11). Data on physical activity in relation to molecular subtype of breast cancer are also sparse and inconsistent (7, 12-19). Whether physical activity reduces incidence of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer is of particular interest because this subtype has a worse prognosis than ER-positive cancer (20) and disproportionately affects African American women (20-22).
In the present study, we prospectively assessed vigorous exercise at baseline, age 30, age 21, and in high school in relation to incidence of breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor status in African American women. We also assessed time spent brisk walking, sitting watching television, and sitting at work. The data were obtained during 16 years of follow-up in the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), a cohort study established in 1995. In an early cross-sectional analysis, vigorous exercise was inversely associated with prevalent breast cancer (23).
Materials and Methods
The BWHS
The BWHS is an ongoing follow-up study that began in 1995 when 59,000 African American women aged 21-69 years from the mainland U.S. enrolled by completing mailed health questionnaires. The women provided information on demographic characteristics, weight, height, recreational exercise, medical history, and other factors. They are followed every two years through mailed and web questionnaires that update exposure information and ascertain incident breast cancer and other outcomes (24). Deaths are ascertained through family members, the U.S. Postal service, and the National Death Index. Follow-up of the baseline cohort over seven completed questionnaire cycles is 80%. The Boston University Medical Campus Institutional Review Board approved the research.
Physical activity
At baseline in 1995, participants reported the average number of hours per week (none, <1, 1, 2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-9, ≥10) spent in vigorous physical activity (e.g., basketball, swimming, running, aerobics) at baseline (in the previous year), at around age 30, at around age 21, and in high school. They reported hours/week of walking for exercise at baseline (none, <1, 1, 2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-9, ≥10), and in 2003 and 2005 they reported the pace of walking (stroll <2 mph, average 2-3 mph, fairly brisk 3-4 mph, brisk ≥4 mph). A participant's walking was defined as brisk if she reported on the 2003 or 2005 questionnaire that her pace of walking was fairly brisk or brisk. Vigorous activity and walking for exercise were updated on follow-up questionnaires in 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2009. Hours/day spent sitting watching television (0, <1, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5 hours/day) and sitting at work (0, <1, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5 hours/day) was asked in 1995 and updated in 1997, 1999, and 2001. In a validation study in which participants wore actigraphs (activity monitors) during their waking hours for a week, actigraph counts were significantly correlated with BWHS questionnaire data on recent vigorous exercise (r=0.40, p<0.05)(25).
Covariates
The baseline questionnaire collected information on adult height, current weight, age at menarche, parity, age at first birth, breast cancer in first degree relatives, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, menopausal status, age at menopause, oral contraceptive use, use of menopausal female hormone supplements, and years of education. It also collected data on usual diet in the past year with a 68-item version of the National Cancer Institute-Block food frequency questionnaire.(26) Follow-up questionnaires updated information on weight, alcohol consumption, parity, menopausal status, age at menopause, oral contraceptive use, supplemental female hormone use, years of education, and dietary intake. As described previously (27), factor analysis was used to identify two major dietary patterns based on 35 foods or food groups from the food frequency questionnaire data: the “vegetables/fruit” pattern (sometimes called “prudent”) was characterized by high intake of fruits and vegetables, and the “meat/fried foods” pattern (sometimes called “Western”) was characterized by high intake of meat, fried foods, and sweets. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.
Breast cancer cases
Incident breast cancers were ascertained largely through self-report on the biennial follow-up questionnaires, and a small proportion was ascertained through linkage to 24 state cancer registries in the states in which 95% of BWHS participants reside. Confirmation was through hospital pathology records and pathology data from the cancer registries. Of cases for which pathology records have been obtained to date (>80%), more than 99% were confirmed. The present analysis is based on 1,364 confirmed invasive breast cancer cases ascertained through year 2011 among women who were age 30 or older at baseline; 8.0% of cases were diagnosed at age 30-39, 32.4% at 40-49, 35.2% at 50-59, and 24.4% at 60 or older. Information on hormone receptor status was available for 80% of the cases, of which 688 were classified as ER+ and 405 as ER-; among the latter, pathology data were sufficient to classify 137 as triple negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-). The distribution of estrogen and progesterone receptor status was similar to that reported elsewhere for African American women (28-30). Breast cancer risk factors were similar in cases with known and unknown receptor status (31, 32).
Statistical analysis
Very few breast cancer cases occurred among women <30 years of age. We confined the analysis to women 30 years or older at baseline and excluded 1,273 women who reported having had cancer and 838 women who did not report their vigorous exercise on the baseline questionnaire, resulting in an analytic cohort of 44,078 women. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of categories of vigorous exercise, walking, and sitting with incidence of breast cancer. In the analysis of brisk walking, hours of walking at a pace slower than fairly brisk or brisk was assigned a value of 0 hours/week of brisk walking. Participants contributed person time to the analysis from base line until the occurrence of breast cancer, loss to follow-up (the date of the last returned questionnaire), death, or the end of follow-up in 2011, whichever occurred first. Ductal carcinoma in-situ breast cancer cases were censored at the date of diagnosis. From 1995 through 2011, a total of 307,672 person years were accumulated.
For vigorous exercise at four time points (baseline, age 30, age 21, and high school), we assessed exercise in that period relative to <1 hour/week of exercise in that period. In a time varying analysis, we updated vigorous exercise during follow-up. In an analysis of the sum of metabolic equivalent hours (MET-hrs) from vigorous exercise and brisk walking (defined as fairly brisk or brisk walking), we assigned 6 METs to each hour of vigorous exercise and 3.5 METs to each hour of brisk walking (33). We assessed sitting at work and sitting watching TV both at baseline and as time varying. Covariates that changed over time (e.g., BMI) were treated as time-varying in the analyses; the Anderson-Gill data structure was used to update these covariates and exact methods were used to handle tied events (34). The multivariable models were adjusted for the factors most strongly associated with exercise in our data: age (single year), time period (questionnaire cycle), BMI (<25, 25-29, ≥30), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥3), years of education (≤12, 13-15, 16, ≥17), vegetable/fruit dietary pattern (quintiles), and meat/fried foods dietary pattern (quintiles). The analyses of brisk walking were adjusted, in addition, for vigorous exercise, and the analyses of sitting at work and sitting watching TV were adjusted for vigorous exercise and mutually for each other. Models that further controlled for age at menarche, age at first birth, oral contraceptive use, supplemental female hormone use, menopausal status, age at menopause, history of breast cancer in a first degree relative, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking yielded IRR estimates that were within two percent of the estimates from the restricted model that controlled for age, time period, BMI, parity, education, and dietary pattern; only the latter estimates are presented. In addition, the multivariable IRRs were closely similar to estimates from models in which only age and calendar time were controlled. Tests for trend were conducted by using an ordinal value for each level of exercise modeled as a single variable. Tests for interaction were performed using the likelihood ratio test comparing models with and without cross-product terms between the covariate and physical activity. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results
Relative to women who exercised vigorously <1 hour/week at baseline (table 1), women who exercised vigorously at least 5 hours/week were younger, more likely to be nulliparous, thinner, more educated, and have a dietary pattern high in vegetables and fruits, and less likely to have a dietary pattern low in meats and fried foods. Vigorous exercisers also reported more hours of exercise at age 30, at age 21, and in high school than less active women, and they walked more at baseline. Vigorous exercisers did not differ materially from less active women in hours spent sitting watching TV or sitting at work.
Table 1. Vigorous exercise at baseline according to baseline characteristics (age-standardized).
| Characteristic | Hours/wk | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| <1 | 1-4 | ≥5 | |
| Number of women | 22,760 | 14,638 | 5,399 |
| Age, % | |||
| 30-39 | 37 | 51 | 54 |
| 40-49 | 37 | 34 | 33 |
| 50-59 | 18 | 12 | 10 |
| ≥60 | 8 | 3 | 3 |
| BMI, mean | 29.4 | 27.6 | 26.7 |
| ≥16 years of education, % | 40 | 51 | 48 |
| Age at menarche ≤ 11, % | 28 | 27 | 26 |
| Nulliparous, % | 24 | 29 | 30 |
| First birth before age 20, % | 27 | 22 | 25 |
| Recent oral contraceptive user, % | 32 | 33 | 33 |
| Female hormone user, % | 19 | 20 | 19 |
| Premenopausal, % | 70 | 71 | 71 |
| Age at menopause <45, % | 21 | 20 | 20 |
| Family history of breast cancer,% | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Cigarette smoking, % | |||
| Never smoked | 58 | 60 | 58 |
| <20 pack years | 30 | 31 | 31 |
| ≥20 pack years | 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Alcohol consumption, % | |||
| Never drank | 58 | 56 | 55 |
| <7 d/day | 35 | 37 | 36 |
| ≥7d/day | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Vegetable/fruit pattern, top quintile, % | 15 | 25 | 33 |
| Meat/fried foods pattern, top quintile,% | 23 | 16 | 13 |
| Any walking for exercise at baseline | |||
| <1hr/wk | 57 | 27 | 20 |
| ≥5 hr/week | 8 | 13 | 41 |
| Brisk walking for exercise at baseline | |||
| <1 hr/week | 87 | 71 | 64 |
| ≥5 hr/week | 3 | 6 | 19 |
| Vigorous exercise at age 30 | |||
| ≥5 hr/wk | 9 | 19 | 60 |
| Vigorous exercise at age 21 | |||
| ≥5hr/wk | 18 | 32 | 53 |
| Vigorous exercise in high school | |||
| ≥5hr/wk | 28 | 45 | 62 |
| Sitting watching TV at baseline | |||
| <1hr/day | 10 | 13 | 13 |
| ≥5hr/day | 17 | 11 | 15 |
| Sitting at work at baseline | |||
| <1hr/day | 20 | 16 | 18 |
| ≥5hr/day | 48 | 50 | 50 |
The incidence of breast cancer decreased with increasing hours/week of baseline vigorous exercise (p trend=0.05)(table 2). IRRs for 5-6 hours/week and ≥7 hours/week relative to <1 hour/week were 0.89 (95% CI 0.69, 1.14) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.57, 0.96), respectively. For ER-positive breast cancer, the IRR for ≥7 hours/week relative to <1 hour/week was 0.75 (95% CI 0.52, 1.09) (p trend= 0.28), and the corresponding estimate for ER-negative breast cancer was 0.85 (95% CI 0.55, 1.33) (p trend= 0.48). For triple negative breast cancer, all IRRs were close to the null, with the IRR for ≥7 hours/week relative to <1 hour/week equal to 0.96 (95% CI 0.46-2.01). The results were closely similar after additional control for brisk walking and sitting at work and watching TV. Associations were not stronger when vigorous exercise was assessed as a time varying variable.
Table 2. Vigorous exercise at baseline in relation to incidence of breast cancer overall and ER+ and ER- breast cancer.
| All breast cancer | ER+ breast cancer | ER- breast cancer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| hrs/wk | Cases | Person years | IRR* (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) |
| < 1 | 773 | 313,900 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 382 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 228 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| 1 | 117 | 62,939 | 0.85 (0.70, 1.03) | 59 | 0.86 (0.66, 1.14) | 35 | 0.83 (0.58, 1.18) |
| 2 | 149 | 67,081 | 0.99 (0.83, 1.19) | 76 | 1.00 (0.78, 1.29) | 45 | 1.00 (0.72, 1.38) |
| 3-4 | 159 | 77,243 | 0.94 (0.79, 1.12) | 84 | 0.98 (0.77, 1.25) | 45 | 0.88 (0.63, 1.22) |
| 5-6 | 69 | 35,793 | 0.89 (0.69, 1.14) | 36 | 0.92 (0.65, 1.30) | 23 | 0.97 (0.63, 1.50) |
| ≥ 7 | 63 | 39,593 | 0.74 (0.57, 0.96) | 32 | 0.75 (0.52, 1.09) | 22 | 0.85 (0.55, 1.33) |
| P trend = 0.05 | P trend= 0.28 | P trend=0.43 | |||||
IRRs adjusted for age (single year), time period (questionnaire cycle), years of education (≤12, 13-15, 16, ≥17), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥3), vegetable/fruit dietary pattern (quintiles), and meat/fried foods dietary pattern (quintiles)
There were no trends in the IRR estimates across increasing hours/week of vigorous exercise at age 30, age 21, or in high school: for ≥7 hours/week relative to <1 hour/week, the IRR was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.82, 1.24) for exercise at age 30, 1.09 (95% CI 0.92, 1.31) for exercise at age 21, and 1.01 (95% CI 0.84, 1.20) for exercise during high school. In an analysis that assessed an average of vigorous exercise reported at baseline, age 30, age 21, and in high school, the IRRs were close to 1.0. Many women varied considerably in their exercise habits over time despite the correlation of recent exercise with exercise in earlier life. To assess the most consistent exercisers, we restricted an analysis to women who reported at least 5 hours/week of vigorous exercise in every time period (baseline, age 30, age 21, and high school) and women who reported <1 hour/week of vigorous exercise in every time period. Based on 45 incident breast cancer cases that occurred among women in the ≥5 hours/week stratum and 112 that occurred in the <1 hour/week stratum, the IRR for breast cancer overall was 0.70 (95% CI 0.58, 1.06); the corresponding estimates was 0.84 (95% CI 0.56, 1.27) for ER-positive cancer (based on 24 and 55 cases, respectively) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.37, 1.18) for ER-negative breast cancer (based on 12 and 37 cases, respectively).
Walking for exercise at baseline without taking account of pace was not associated with incidence of breast cancer: the IRR for ≥7 hours/week relative to <1 hour/week was 0.98 (95% CI 0.77, 1.23) for breast cancer overall, 0.99 (95% CI 0.71-1.38) for ER-positive cancer, and 0.96 (95% CI 0.63, 1.49) for ER-negative cancer. However, as shown in table 3, brisk walking for exercise at baseline was inversely associated with overall breast cancer incidence (p trend <0.02) in an analysis that controlled for vigorous exercise: the IRR for ≥7 hours/week relative to <1 hour/week was 0.77 (95% CI 0.53-0.1.13). The corresponding estimate was 0.83 (95% CI 0.50, 1.38) for ER-positive cancer, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.46, 1.68) for ER-negative breast cancer. After control for sitting watching TV in addition to the other risk factors, the estimates were little changed.
Table 3. Brisk* walking at baseline in relation to breast cancer overall, ER+ and ER- breast cancer.
| All breast cancer | ER+ breast cancer | ER- breast cancer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| hrs/wk | Cases | Person years | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) |
| <1 | 1086 | 470,638 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 544 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 310 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| 1 | 67 | 31,643 | 0.96 (0.75, 1.22) | 36 | 1.02 (0.72, 1.43) | 23 | 1.10 (0.72, 1.68) |
| 2 | 59 | 32,662 | 0.79 (0.61, 1.03) | 34 | 0.88 (0.62, 1.25) | 14 | 0.63 (0.37, 1.08) |
| 3-4 | 78 | 37,884 | 0.88 (0.69, 1.11) | 36 | 0.77 (0.55, 1.09) | 30 | 1.17 (0.79, 1.71) |
| 5-6 | 40 | 20,299 | 0.84 (0.61, 1.16) | 20 | 0.80 (0.51, 1.27) | 16 | 1.14 (0.68, 1.90) |
| 7+ | 29 | 17,057 | 0.77 (0.53, 1.13) | 16 | 0.83 (0.50, 1.38) | 10 | 0.88 (0.46, 1.68) |
| Ptrend=0.02 | Ptrend=0.08 | Ptrend=0.98 | |||||
Walking defined as brisk based on fairly brisk or brisk pace reported on the 2003 or 2005 questionnaire
IRRs adjusted for age (single year), time period (questionnaire cycle), BMI (<25, 25-29, ≥30 ), years of education (≤ 12, 13-15, 16, ≥ 17), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥ 3), vegetable/fruit dietary pattern (quintiles), meat/fried foods dietary pattern (quintiles), and vigorous exercise (<1,1-4, ≥5 hours/wk)
In an analysis of the sum of MET-hours from vigorous exercise and brisk walking at baseline, an inverse association with breast cancer incidence was similar to that for vigorous exercise and brisk walking alone: the IRR for ≥45 MET hours/week relative to none was 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.90) for breast cancer overall, 0.68 (95% CI 0.50-0.95) for ER+ cancer, and 0.90 (95% CI 0.62-1.32) for ER- cancer.
Associations of baseline vigorous exercise with overall breast cancer incidence within categories of age at diagnosis, BMI, parity, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status are shown in table 4. An inverse association was weaker among women who were at least 50 years old than among younger women, but the p value for interaction was 0.44. Inverse associations of exercise with breast cancer incidence were similar across strata of BMI, parity, family history of breast cancer and menopausal status.
Table 4. Vigorous exercise at baseline in relation to incidence of breast cancer by age, body mass index, parity, family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, and age.
| Hrs/wk | Cases | IRR* (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) | P interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age <50 | Age ≥50 | |||||
| <1 | 287 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 486 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 1 | 55 | 0.77 (0.58, 1.03) | 62 | 0.90 (0.69, 1.18) | ||
| 2 | 63 | 0.84 (0.64, 1.11) | 86 | 1.12 (0.88, 1.41) | ||
| 3-4 | 75 | 0.83 (0.64, 1.08) | 84 | 1.02 (0.80, 1.29) | ||
| 5-6 | 31 | 0.74 (0.51, 1.08) | 38 | 1.02 (0.73, 1.43) | ||
| ≥7 | 26 | 0.57 (0.38, 0.86) | 37 | 0.91 (0.65, 1.27) | ||
| P trend = 0.003 | P trend = 0.98 | 0.44 | ||||
| BMI <30 | BMI ≥30 | |||||
| <1 | 418 | 1.00 (Ref) | 350 | 1.00 (Ref) | ||
| 1 | 71 | 0.86 (0.67, 1.11) | 45 | 0.83 (0.61, 1.13) | ||
| 2 | 101 | 1.09 (0.88, 1.36) | 48 | 0.85 (0.62, 1.15) | ||
| 3-4 | 110 | 0.98 (0.79, 1.21) | 49 | 0.88 (0.65, 1.19) | ||
| 5-6 | 50 | 0.96 (0.71, 1.30) | 18 | 0.74 (0.46, 1.19) | ||
| ≥7 | 41 | 0.73 (0.53, 1.01) | 22 | 0.81 (0.52, 1.25) | ||
| P trend = 0.24 | P trend = 0.08 | 0.28 | ||||
| Nulliparous | Parous | |||||
| <1 | 137 | 1.00 (Ref) | 636 | 1.00 (Ref) | ||
| 1 | 19 | 0.69 (0.40, 1.04) | 98 | 0.90 (0.73, 1.12) | ||
| 2 | 29 | 0.82 (0.54, 1.23) | 120 | 1.05 (0.86, 1.28) | ||
| 3-4 | 48 | 1.12 (0.80, 1.59) | 111 | 0.87 (0.71, 1.07) | ||
| 5-6 | 16 | 0.79 (0.46, 1.34) | 53 | 0.92 (0.69, 1.23) | ||
| ≥7 | 18 | 0.70 (0.48, 1.31) | 45 | 0.72 (0.53, 0.97) | ||
| P trend = 0.55 | P trend = 0.05 | 0.26 | ||||
| Family History Yes | Family History No | |||||
| <1 | 123 | 1.00 (Ref) | 650 | 1.00 (Ref) | ||
| 1 | 16 | 0.73 (0.43, 1.24) | 101 | 0.87 (0.70, 1.07) | ||
| 2 | 23 | 1.04 (0.66, 1.64) | 126 | 0.99 (0.82, 1.20) | ||
| 3-4 | 28 | 1.05 (0.68, 1.60) | 131 | 0.91 (0.75, 1.11) | ||
| 5-6 | 11 | 0.88 (0.47, 1.65) | 58 | 0.89 (0.68, 1.17) | ||
| ≥7 | 10 | 0.75 (0.39, 1.44) | 53 | 0.74 (0.56, 0.99) | ||
| P trend = 0.59 | P trend = 0.05 | 0.97 | ||||
| Premenopausal | Postmenopausal | |||||
| <1 | 238 | 1.00 (Ref) | 425 | 1.00 (Ref) | ||
| 1 | 52 | 0.88 (0.65, 1.19) | 47 | 0.81 (0.60, 1.09) | ||
| 2 | 63 | 0.99 (0.75, 1.31) | 65 | 1.01 (0.78, 1.31) | ||
| 3-4 | 74 | 0.99 (0.76, 1.29) | 65 | 0.94 (0.72, 1.22) | ||
| 5-6 | 32 | 0.89 (0.61, 1.30) | 27 | 0.85 (0.60, 1.33) | ||
| ≥7 | 24 | 0.64 (0.42, 0.98) | 32 | 0.94 (0.66, 1.36) | ||
| P trend = 0.13 | P trend = 0.55 | 0.76 | ||||
IRRs adjusted for age (single year), questionnaire cycle, years of education (≤12, 13-14, 16, ≥17), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥3), vegetable/fruit dietary pattern (quintiles), and meat/fried foods dietary pattern (quintiles)
IRRs for breast cancer for women who reported the most sitting at work or watching TV were slightly above 1.0 (table 5); these analyses mutually controlled each type of sitting and for vigorous exercise in addition to the other breast cancer risk factors. For breast cancer overall, the IRR was 1.13 (95% CI 0.91-1.40) (p trend = 0.66) for ≥5 hours/day of sitting watching TV relative to < 1 hour/day, and the corresponding estimate was 1.05 (95% CI 0.90, 1.22) for sitting at work. In a time varying analysis, the associations were similar. In an analysis in which hours per week of sitting at work and watching television were combined, the IRR for breast cancer for ≥10 hours/week relative to <3 hours/week was 1.05 (95% CI 0.86, 1.17).
Table 5. Sitting watching TV and sitting at work in 1995 in relation to incidence of breast cancer overall and ER+ and ER- breast cancer.
| All breast cancer | ER+ breast cancer | ER- breast cancer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Hrs/day | Cases | Person years | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | IRR (95% CI) |
| TV | |||||||
| <1 | 158 | 72,748 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 84 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 43 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| 1-2 | 540 | 236,342 | 1.05 (0.88, 1.26) | 288 | 1.06 (0.83, 1.35) | 161 | 1.18 (0.84, 1.65) |
| 3-4 | 430 | 206,362 | 0.97 (0.80, 1.16) | 212 | 0.90 (0.70, 1.17) | 128 | 1.09 (0.77, 1.55) |
| 5+ | 205 | 86,367 | 1.13 (0.91, 1.40) | 88 | 0.94 (0.69, 1.28) | 67 | 1.39 (0.94, 2.07) |
| Ptrend=0.66 | Ptrend=0.25 | Ptrend=0.24 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Work | |||||||
| <1 | 260 | 110,837 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 136 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 71 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| 1-2 | 164 | 70,811 | 1.06 (0.87, 1.30) | 89 | 1.06 (0.80, 1.39) | 48 | 1.10 (0.76, 1.60) |
| 3-4 | 257 | 105,176 | 1.15 (0.96, 1.37) | 146 | 1.19 (0.94, 1.52) | 56 | 0.89 (0.62, 1.27) |
| 5+ | 635 | 301,221 | 1.05 (0.90, 1.22) | 294 | 0.92 (0.74, 1.13) | 211 | 1.19 (0.90, 1.57) |
| Ptrend=0.68 | Ptrend=0.26 | Ptrend=0.21 | |||||
IRRs adjusted for age (single year), time period (questionnaire cycle), BMI (<25, 25-29, ≥30 ), years of education (≤ 12, 13-15, 16, ≥ 17), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥ 3), vegetable/fruit dietary pattern (quintiles), and meat/fried foods dietary pattern (quintiles), and vigorous activity; sitting watching TV adjusted for sitting at work and vice versa
We assessed the joint effects of vigorous exercise with combined hours of sitting watching TV and at work (table 6). For breast cancer overall, the IRR estimates were largest for women who exercised vigorously<1 hour/week, intermediate for those who exercised 1-4 hours/week, and lowest for those who exercised at least 5 hours/week, regardless of their hours of sitting; within these categories of exercise, there were no clear trends in risk across increasing amount of sitting.
Table 6. Vigorous exercise together with combined sitting watching TV and sitting at work in 1995 in relation to incidence of breast cancer overall and ER+ and ER- breast cancer.
| All breast cancer | ER+ breast cancer | ER- breast cancer | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Hrs/wk Exercise | Hrs/day Sitting | Cases | Person years | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | Person years | IRR (95% CI) | Cases | Person years | IRR (95% CI) |
| <1 | <5 | 184 | 72,646 | 1.14 (0.78, 1.66) | 98 | 72,546 | 0.89 (0.57, 1.42) | 48 | 72,497 | 1.45 (0.65, 3.22) |
| <1 | 5-9 | 352 | 139,461 | 1.24 (0.87, 1.78) | 180 | 139,268 | 0.93 (0.60, 1.45) | 104 | 139,200 | 1.73 (0.80, 3.72) |
| <1 | 10+ | 200 | 83,625 | 1.22 (0.84, 1.78) | 86 | 83,495 | 0.79 (0.49, 1.26) | 66 | 83,477 | 1.89 (0.86, 4.16) |
| 1-4 | <5 | 104 | 46,394 | 1.12 (0.75, 1.65) | 60 | 46,346 | 0.94 (0.58, 1.52) | 24 | 46,306 | 1.20 (0.51, 2.78) |
| 1-4 | 5-9 | 206 | 101,305 | 1.11 (0.77, 1.61) | 109 | 101,202 | 0.86 (0.55, 1.35) | 59 | 101,154 | 1.46 (0.66, 3.19) |
| 1-4 | 10+ | 96 | 50,555 | 1.10 (0.74, 1.64) | 41 | 50,496 | 0.69 (0.41, 1.16) | 34 | 50,489 | 1.80 (0.79, 4.07) |
| 5+ | <5 | 33 | 16,824 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 23 | 16,814 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 7 | 16,792 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| 5+ | 5-9 | 60 | 34,856 | 0.96 (0.63, 1.47) | 27 | 34,816 | 0.63 (0.36, 1.10) | 24 | 34,812 | 1.76 (0.76, 4.09) |
| 5+ | 10+ | 29 | 20,177 | 0.85 (0.51, 1.40) | 14 | 20,159 | 0.62 (0.32, 1.20) | 9 | 20,154 | 1.18 (0.44, 3.18) |
IRRs adjusted for age (single year), time period (questionnaire cycle), BMI (<25, 25-29, ≥30 ), years of education (≤ 12, 13-15, 16, ≥ 17), parity (0, 1, 2, ≥ 3), vegetable/fruit dietary pattern (quintiles), and meat/fried foods dietary pattern (quintiles)
Discussion
In this prospective study of African American women, recent vigorous exercise reported at baseline was inversely associated with overall incidence of breast cancer. The IRRs were close to the null for levels of exercise up to about 5 hours/week, and the estimated reductions in incidence for 5-6 and ≥7 hours per week of exercise were 11% and 26%, respectively. Brisk walking at baseline was associated with similar reductions. If the associations are real, a considerable amount of vigorous exercise or brisk walking is required for a reduction in breast cancer risk. We found no association of vigorous exercise at age 30, age 21, or in high school with breast cancer incidence. These variables might have been reported less accurately than recent exercise, or exercise in those time periods may not be relevant. Results from an analysis confined to the relatively small subset of women whose exercise habits were consistent across all time periods did not suggest an inverse association stronger than that for recent exercise.
While there is growing evidence that physical activity is protective against breast cancer (1-5), there are inconsistences, probably due in part to the fact that associations have generally been weak. Even results on vigorous exercise, for which associations have tended to be strongest, have varied, with some studies finding associations for exercise in early life, some for later life, and yet others for exercise throughout the life span.(1-6).
Previous results on exercise and breast cancer incidence specifically among African American women come from four case-control studies and a follow-up study. In the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study (CARE) (7), lifetime recreational physical activity was inversely associated with breast cancer incidence, with an odds ratio of 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.93) for ≥3 hours/week relative to inactivity based on 1,605 African American cases; the study found no differences by menopausal status. Breast cancer risk was inversely associated with lifetime physical activity in premenopausal and postmenopausal women in a case-control study in San Francisco that included 394 African American cases (9) and with recent exercise in two case-control studies that included 88 African American cases (10) and 97 African American cases (11). The only previous findings specific to African American women based on prospectively collected data come from the Southern Community Cohort follow-up study: based on a nested case-control study comprised largely of postmenopausal women that included 374 African American cases, neither recreational activity at baseline nor at ages 30-39 was significantly associated with breast cancer risk (8).
We found no evidence that the association of baseline physical activity with breast cancer incidence differed by ER status, but larger numbers will be required to firmly establish whether there are differences. In two studies that found inverse associations of physical activity with breast cancer overall, the inverse associations have been stronger for ER- cancer: in the California Teachers follow-up study, average lifetime exercise was not associated significantly with incidence of ER-positive breast cancer (based on 1879 cases), whereas there was a statistically significant inverse association with ER-negative cancer (345 cases)(14); the association was present among postmenopausal women and the number of premenopausal cases was insufficient to determine the association in that subgroup. In the NIH-AARP follow-up study of postmenopausal women, there was also little association with ER-positive cancer (2083 cases), whereas there was a significant inverse association with ER-negative breast cancer (411cases) (16). In contrast, other studies of premenopausal and postmenopausal women (7, 12, 15) and of postmenopausal women only (13, 17, 18) have found no difference by ER status. In the Women's Health Initiative study of postmenopausal women, physical activity at baseline was inversely associated, but not significantly, with risk of both ER-positive and triple negative breast cancer (19). Our results on triple negative cancer were close to the null, but confidence intervals were wide.
We found no statistically significant differences in the associations of baseline vigorous exercise with breast cancer risk in categories of age, BMI, parity, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status, although an inverse association was stronger among women less than 50 years of age than among older women. Associations in previous studies have varied across subgroups but not consistently (1-6).
There were small nonsignificant increases in risk of breast cancer associated with long hours of sitting at work or watching TV. An analysis of the two types of sitting jointly with vigorous exercise did not provide evidence for an increase in breast cancer risk in the women who were least active. In the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II (18) and the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (35), both of postmenopausal women, time sitting was associated with small nonsignificant increases in breast cancer incidence.
Exercise might lead to lower incidence of breast cancer through biologic mechanisms (3, 36, 37) that include reductions in menstrual cycles and ovarian hormones (4, 38-42), reductions in weight gain and obesity (4), reductions in hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and IGF-I (43, 44), effects on cellular proliferation and apoptosis in mammary tissues (45), and effects on inflammation and immune function (46, 47). Our results do not support an influence of physical activity though effects on weight gain and obesity, because control for BMI did not change the IRRs, associations did not vary across categories of BMI, and associations were not stronger among postmenopausal women.
Data on physical activity were collected prospectively in the present study, thus obviating concern about reporting bias. Case-control studies have tended to find stronger associations of physical activity with breast cancer risk than follow-up studies. This difference could reflect better collection of detailed data on physical activity in the case-control studies. On the other hand, it could also reflect bias in the case-control studies from differential reporting of exercise by case/control status or disproportionate participation of more educated potential controls. The usefulness of the data reported on recent vigorous exercise in the present study is supported by two lines of evidence: in a BWHS validation study, self-report of recent vigorous exercise was significantly associated with an objective measure of physical activity (25), and vigorous exercise was associated with reduced incidence of type two diabetes (48) and obesity (49) in the BWHS, as expected. We had no validation data on exercise at age 30, 21, or high school; exercise at these earlier time periods may have been reported less accurately than recent exercise. We also had no validation data on hours/day of sitting, but hours/day of sitting watching television was associated with a significant increase in risk of diabetes in the BWHS, independent of recreational exercise (48). Participants will have varied in their definitions of vigorous exercise and of brisk walking, and random misclassification will have tended to reduce the associations of the more extreme categories of exercise with breast cancer risk. However, brisk walking as defined in the present study was associated with reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes in the BWHS (48). Lack of information on moderate-intensity activities other than walking is a limitation of the present study. Follow-up of the cohort for breast cancer was excellent, reducing concern about bias due to selective losses, and important potential confounding factors were controlled. ER status was determined by many institutions using their own parameters, and misclassification will have tended to reduce any differences between molecular subtypes.
In summary, the present study adds to the small body of evidence on exercise and breast cancer incidence in African American women. The results suggest that high levels of recent vigorous exerciseor brisk walking may result in a reduction in the incidence breast cancer.
The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. Data on breast cancer pathology were obtained from several state cancer registries (AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, NJ, NY, NC, OK, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA) and results reported do not necessarily represent their views
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA058420; L. Rosenberg) and UM1 CA164974; L. Rosenberg)
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
References
- 1.Friedenreich CM, Cust AE. Physical activity and breast cancer risk: impact of timing, type and dose of activity and population subgroup effects. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:636–47. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.029132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gammon MD, John EM, Britton JA. Recreational and occupational physical activities and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:100–17. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.2.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Monninkhof EM, Elias SG, Vlems FA, van der Tweel I, Schuit AJ, Voskuil DW, et al. Physical activity and breast cancer: a systematic review. Epidemiology. 2007;18:137–57. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000251167.75581.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. AICR. 2007 [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update: Project Report Summary. Washington, DC: 2010. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Breast Cancer. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu Y, Zhang D, Kang S. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:869–82. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2396-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bernstein L, Patel AV, Ursin G, Sullivan-Halley J, Press MF, Deapen D, et al. Lifetime recreational exercise activity and breast cancer risk among black women and white women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1671–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen SS, Matthews CE, Bradshaw PT, Lipworth L, Buchowski MS, Signorello LB, et al. Sedentary Behavior, Physical Activity, and Likelihood of Breast Cancer among Black and White Women: A Report from the Southern Community Cohort Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6:566–76. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.John EM, Horn-Ross PL, Koo J. Lifetime physical activity and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population: the San Francisco Bay area breast cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1143–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ratnasinghe LD, Modali RV, Seddon MB, Lehman TA. Physical activity and reduced breast cancer risk: a multinational study. Nutr Cancer. 2010;62:425–35. doi: 10.1080/01635580903441295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sheppard VB, Makambi K, Taylor T, Wallington SF, Sween J, Adams-Campbell L. Physical activity reduces breast cancer risk in African American women. Ethn Dis. 2011;21:406–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Adams SA, Matthews CE, Hebert JR, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, Shu XO, et al. Association of physical activity with hormone receptor status: the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1170–8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bardia A, Hartmann LC, Vachon CM, Vierkant RA, Wang AH, Olson JE, et al. Recreational physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer based on hormone receptor status. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2478–83. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.22.2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dallal CM, Sullivan-Halley J, Ross RK, Wang Y, Deapen D, Horn-Ross PL, et al. Long-term recreational physical activity and risk of invasive and in situ breast cancer: the California teachers study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:408–15. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.4.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Enger SM, Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Carpenter CL, Bernstein L. Body size, physical activity, and breast cancer hormone receptor status: results from two case-control studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:681–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Peters TM, Schatzkin A, Gierach GL, Moore SC, Lacey JV, Jr, Wareham NJ, et al. Physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:289–96. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leitzmann MF, Moore SC, Peters TM, Lacey JV, Jr, Schatzkin A, Schairer C, et al. Prospective study of physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R92. doi: 10.1186/bcr2190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hildebrand JS, Gapstur SM, Campbell PT, Gaudet MM, Patel AV. Recreational physical activity and leisure-time sitting in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:1906–12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Phipps AI, Chlebowski RT, Prentice R, McTiernan A, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J, et al. Body size, physical activity, and risk of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:454–63. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chlebowski RT, Chen Z, Anderson GL, Rohan T, Aragaki A, Lane D, et al. Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:439–48. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007;109:1721–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Jama. 2006;295:2492–502. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L, Rao RS, Palmer JR. Strenuous physical activity and breast cancer risk in African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93:267–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Russell CW, Boggs DA, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L. Use of a web-based questionnaire in the Black Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:1286–91. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carter-Nolan PL, Adams-Campbell LL, Makambi K, Lewis S, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L. Validation of physical activity instruments: Black Women's Health Study. Ethn Dis. 2006;16:943–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Block G, Hartman AM, Naughton D. A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation. Epidemiology. 1990;1:58–64. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boggs DA, Palmer JR, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Dietary patterns and 14-y weight gain in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:86–94. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.013482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Furberg H, Millikan R, Dressler L, Newman B, Geradts J. Tumor characteristics in African American and white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;68:33–43. doi: 10.1023/a:1017994726207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gapstur SM, Dupuis J, Gann P, Collila S, Winchester DP. Hormone receptor status of breast tumors in black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white women. An analysis of 13,239 cases. Cancer. 1996;77:1465–71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960415)77:8<1465::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Parise CA, Bauer KR, Caggiano V. Variation in breast cancer subtypes with age and race/ethnicity. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Ambrosone CB, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Parity and lactation in relation to estrogen receptor negative breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1883–91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rosenberg L, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Adams-Campbell LL, Palmer JR. Oral contraceptive use and estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer among African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2073–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR, Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:71–80. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Therneau T. Extending the Cox model. In: Lin DY, Fleming TR, editors. Proceedings of the First Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics :Survival Analaysis. Springer Verlag; New York: 1997. pp. 51–84. [Google Scholar]
- 35.George SM, Irwin ML, Matthews CE, Mayne ST, Gail MH, Moore SC, et al. Beyond recreational physical activity: examining occupational and household activity, transportation activity, and sedentary behavior in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2288–95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Neilson HK, Friedenreich CM, Brockton NT, Millikan RC. Physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer: proposed biologic mechanisms and areas for future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:11–27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Friedenreich CM. Physical activity and breast cancer: review of the epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011;188:125–39. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10858-7_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bonen A, Ling WY, MacIntyre KP, Neil R, McGrail JC, Belcastro AN. Effects of exercise on the serum concentrations of FSH, LH, progesterone, and estradiol. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1979;42:15–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00421100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jurkowski JE, Jones NL, Walker C, Younglai EV, Sutton JR. Ovarian hormonal responses to exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1978;44:109–14. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tymchuk CN, Tessler SB, Barnard RJ. Changes in sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin, and serum lipids in postmenopausal women on a low-fat, high-fiber diet combined with exercise. Nutr Cancer. 2000;38:158–62. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC382_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nestler JE. Obesity, insulin, sex steroids and ovulation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(Suppl 2):S71–3. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Huang WY, Newman B, Millikan RC, Schell MJ, Hulka BS, Moorman PG. Hormone-related factors and risk of breast cancer in relation to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:703–14. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mayer-Davis EJ, Vitolins MZ, Carmichael SL, Hemphill S, Tsaroucha G, Rushing J, et al. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency interview in a Multi-Cultural Epidemiology Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:314–24. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(98)00070-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fletcher O, Gibson L, Johnson N, Altmann DR, Holly JM, Ashworth A, et al. Polymorphisms and circulating levels in the insulin-like growth factor system and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Westerlind KC, McCarty HL, Gibson KJ, Strange R. Effect of exercise on the rat mammary gland: implications for carcinogenesis. Acta Physiol Scand. 2002;175:147–56. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2002.00980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rundle A. Molecular epidemiology of physical activity and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:227–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shephard RJ, Shek PN. Associations between physical activity and susceptibility to cancer: possible mechanisms. Sports Med. 1998;26:293–315. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826050-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Krishnan S, Rosenberg L, Palmer JR. Physical activity and television watching in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes: the Black Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:428–34. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rosenberg L, Kipping-Ruane KL, Boggs DA, Palmer JR. Physical activity and the incidence of obesity in young african-american women. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:262–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]