Abstract
Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) are specialized scavenger cells that mediate high-capacity clearance of soluble waste macromolecules and colloid material, including blood-borne adenovirus. To explore if LSECs function as a sink for other viruses in blood, we studied the fate of virus-like particles (VLPs) of two ubiquitous human DNA viruses, BK and JC polyomavirus, in mice. Like complete virions, VLPs specifically bind to receptors and enter cells, but unlike complete virions, they cannot replicate. 125I-labeled VLPs were used to assess blood decay, organ-, and hepatocellular distribution of ligand, and non-labeled VLPs to examine cellular uptake by immunohisto- and -cytochemistry. BK- and JC-VLPs rapidly distributed to liver, with lesser uptake in kidney and spleen. Liver uptake was predominantly in LSECs. Blood half-life (∼1 min), and tissue distribution of JC-VLPs and two JC-VLP-mutants (L55F and S269F) that lack sialic acid binding affinity, were similar, indicating involvement of non-sialic acid receptors in cellular uptake. Liver uptake was not mediated by scavenger receptors. In spleen, the VLPs localized to the red pulp marginal zone reticuloendothelium, and in kidney to the endothelial lining of vasa recta segments, and the transitional epithelium of renal pelvis. Most VLP-positive vessels in renal medulla did not express PV-1/Meca 32, suggesting location to the non-fenestrated part of vasa recta. The endothelial cells of these vessels also efficiently endocytosed a scavenger receptor ligand, formaldehyde-denatured albumin, suggesting high endocytic activity compared to other renal endothelia. We conclude that LSECs very effectively cleared a large fraction of blood-borne BK- and JC-VLPs, indicating a central role of these cells in early removal of polyomavirus from the circulation. In addition, we report the novel finding that a subpopulation of endothelial cells in kidney, the main organ of polyomavirus persistence, showed selective and rapid uptake of VLPs, suggesting a role in viremic organ tropism.
Introduction
The mucosal surfaces of the respiratory, oral-pharyngeal and gastrointestinal tracts are constantly exposed to a multitude of different viruses, only some of which eventually cause infection and disease [1]. Similarly to bacteria, viruses are likely to leak from the gut to the portal vein, and many of these viruses end up in the liver [2]–[8]. Some picornaviruses such as hepatitis A virus initially replicate in the intestinal mucosal surface and cause acute hepatitis when reaching the liver. Other viruses such as cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, adenovirus, parvovirus B19, and polyomavirus cause only limited liver damage, if at all.
The liver has a critical role in pathogen detection and host defense, and contains the single largest number of macrophages, the highest concentration of natural killer cells and natural killer T cells, and the largest reticuloendothelial network in the body [9]. Of the various liver cells involved in host defense, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), which line the numerous sinusoids of this organ, are the least known. However, studies over the last three decades have revealed that these cells are highly active scavenger cells, removing large amounts of soluble waste macromolecules and nanoparticulate material from blood each day [10]. Thus, LSECS clearly play an important role as sentinel cells of the immune system due to: 1) their location exposing them to 25–30% of cardiac output; 2) their expression of several molecules involved in innate immunity such as various scavenger receptors [11]–[13]), the mannose receptor [14], [15], toll-like receptors 2–4, 7 and 9 [16]–[19], and 3) their capacity to produce cytokines and other molecules to alert their environment [16], [19]. Furthermore, LSECs express Fc gamma-receptor IIb2 [20], [21], which mediates endocytosis of soluble immune complexes, and other receptors involved in virus uptake such as L-SIGN [22] and LSECtin [23]. Ligands eliminated from blood mainly by LSECs, and to a lesser by Kupffer cells (resident liver macrophages), include connective tissue turnover products, lysosomal enzymes [13], [15],[24]–[26]), modified plasma proteins and lipoproteins [27]–[30], soluble IgG immune complexes [31], yeast mannan [32], and adenovirus/adenoviral vectors [7],[33]. Differently to macrophages, LSECs operate essentially via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and not by phagocytosis, and the cells are equipped with an endocytic machinery capable of super-efficient uptake and degradation of the internalized ligands [10], [34]. We have previously shown that this high scavenging activity of LSECs is conserved among all land-based vertebrates (amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) suggesting that this is a general mechanism for how soluble macromolecular waste material, and small colloidal particles, such as viruses, are cleared from blood [10], [35].
Cellular uptake of virus has traditionally been studied in the context of productive infection with disease-forming virus in permissive cells. Apart from the recently reported central role of LSECs in clearing blood-borne adenovirus and adenoviral vectors [7], [33], little is actually known about the role of LSECs in the uptake of virus. To explore the hypothesis that these cells act as general virus scavengers, we have studied the circulatory fate of virus-like particles (VLPs) of two non-enveloped, human DNA viruses; polyomavirus BK and JC (BKV and JCV), in mice. These viruses are approximately 40–45 nm in diameter, and are taken up in their permissive host cells via caveolin-mediated and clathrin-mediated endocytosis, respectively [36]. The VLPs represent a well-established model for endocytosis studies [37], [38]. These particles are empty virus capsids consisting of 72 capsomers of polyoma viral protein 1 (VP1), which mediate the virus binding to sialic acid receptors during infection of susceptible cells [39].
BKV and JCV infect most people early in life and establish lifelong persistent infections in the renourinary tract with asymptomatic episodes of viral reactivation and shedding in urine. While reactivation of BKV may result in severe diseases in the kidney graft and bladder of kidney- and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients [40], JCV may lead to severe demyelinating brain disease, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in immunocompromised individuals, and in patients treated with novel immunomodulatory or depleting therapies for autoimmune diseases [41]. Following respiratory or gastrointestinal transmission, BKV and JCV colonize the renourinary tract as the major site of persistence. To reach the renourinary tract, a viremic phase has been postulated, but the fate of BKV and JCV when they first appear in the circulation is currently unknown. Like most polyomavirus, BKV and JCV replication is highly specific to the human host, which hampered studies of replicative disease in animal models. However, the alpha(2,3)-linked and alpha(2,6)-linked sialic acid receptors used by BKV and JCV, respectively, are widespread in vertebrates, including mice. This encouraged us to study the fate of BK- and JC-VLPs in the blood and their cellular site of uptake in a mouse model similar to other recent studies [37], [42].
Here we present evidence for a central role of LSECs in the initial uptake of polyomavirus from blood. Despite the fact that mouse is not a permissive host for BKV and JCV, LSEC endocytic functions and receptor expression are highly similar between mammalian species, including humans [10], [11], [15], [43]–[45], arguing that human LSECs are likely to also take up these virus particles when they first appear in the circulation. In addition, we found that the BK- and JC-VLPs rapidly distributed to a distinct population of endothelial cells in kidney medulla. These endothelial cells also avidly endocytosed a scavenger receptor ligand, suggesting that they represent a subpopulation of endothelial cells with extraordinarily high endocytic activity.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were approved by the Norwegian National Animal Research Authority (NARA) (approval IDs: ID-1912, ID-2775, ID-4720, ID-4894). The substances used for mouse anesthesia were either 1) a combination of tiletamine hydrochloride (Zoletil forte vet, Virbac) and xylazine (Narcoxyl vet, Intervet), or 2) a combination of fentanyl/fluanisone (Hypnorm, VetaPharma) and midazolam (Dormicum, Roche). The mice were euthanized in 100% CO2, while anesthetized as described above.
Animals
Wild-type C57BL/6 male mice were obtained from Charles River laboratory (France). Mannose-receptor knock-out (MR-/-) C57BL/6 mice [46] were kindly provided by Professor Michel Nussenzweig, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY. The MR-/- status was tested by polymerase chain reaction [46]. The animals were housed in rooms specially designed for mice, with 12 h/12 h day-night cycle, and free access to water and food (standard chow, Scanbur BK, Nittedal, Norway).
Chemicals and reagents
Liberase TM (collagenase) was from Roche Applied Science (Oslo, Norway), Iodogen™ from Pierce Chemicals (Rockford, IL), and carrier-free Na125I from PerkinElmer Norge AS (Oslo, Norway). Bovine serum albumin was from MP Biomedicals (Solon, OH), bovine collagen type I (Vitrogen 100) from Cohesion Technologies (Palo Alto, CA), and Percoll™ and PD-10 columns (Sephadex G-25) from GE Healthcare (Uppsala, Sweden). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 cell culture medium (supplemented with 20 mM sodium bicarbonate, 0.006% penicillin, and 0.01% streptomycin) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO), and Falcon cell culture plates from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Draq5 was from Biostatus limited (Leicestershire, UK). Antibodies and suppliers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Antibodies and lectins used in the study.
Antigen | Host | Clone | Isotype | Source | Dilution |
BK-VP1 | Rabbit | Antiserum | - | [53] | 1∶1600 |
Mannose receptor (CD206) | Goat | Polyclonal | IgG | R&D Systems, AF2534 | 1 µg/ml |
F4/80 | Rat | Cl:A31 | IgG2b | AbD Serotec, MCA497G | 10 µg/ml |
CD31 | Rat | MEC13.3 | IgG2a | Biolegend, 102502 | 5 µg/ml |
CD68 | Rat | FA-11 | IgG2a | Abcam, ab53444 | 10 µg/ml |
CD163 | Rat | ED2 | IgG1 | AbD Serotec, MCA342GA | 10 µg/ml |
Meca 32 | Rat | - | IgG2a | Antibodies online ABIN298904 | 10 µg/ml |
Biotinylated Sambucus nigra agglutinin | - | - | - | Vector Laboratories B-1305 | 10 µg/ml |
Biotinylated Maackia amurensis II hemagglutinin | - | - | - | Vector Laboratories B-1265 | 10 µg/ml |
Secondary antibodies: Alexa488-, Alexa546-, or Alexa555- anti-rat, anti-rabbit or anti-goat IgG (H+L), raised in donkey, goat, or rabbit, all diluted 1∶500 (Life Technologies; Catalog No: A11006, A11008, A11055, A11081, A11010, A21431, A21434, A21428).
Positive lectin labeling was visualized by Alexa555-streptavidin, diluted 1∶200 (Life Technologies; Catalog No S-21381).
Cells
Hepatic non-parenchymal liver cells (NPCs) were prepared by collagenase (Liberase) perfusion of mouse livers, followed by low-speed differential centrifugation to remove hepatocytes, and density sedimentation of the NPCs on 25%–45% Percoll gradients to collect LSEC and Kupffer cells, as described in [47]. Purified LSECs (>90% purity) were obtained after a panning step (8 min, 37°C), to remove Kupffer cells. Primary cell cultures were established on glass cover slides (mixed LSEC and Kupffer cells), and in Falcon plates (LSECs), pre-coated with 2.7 µg/ml collagen type I and maintained in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium at 37°C at 5% CO2. The cultures were washed 40 min after seeding, and allowed to continue spreading for approximately 1 h before use. Seeding of 3×105 LSEC/cm2 gave confluent monolayers, with approximately 1.5×105 cells per cm2.
Virus-like particles (VLPs)
BK- and JC-VLPs were prepared as described previously [48]. Briefly, BK- and JC-VLPs were isolated from Sf9 insect cells infected with recombinant baculovirus encoding Dunlop BK-VP1 or Mad-1 JC-VP1 capsid protein. Recombinant baculoviruses containing PML variants of JC VP1 sequences L55F or S269F were obtained by site specific mutagenesis PCR using the following primers: L55F-Fwd (5′-ACC CAG ATG AGC ATT TTA GGG GTT TTA G-3′) and L55F-Rev (5′-CTA AAA CCC CTA AAA TGC TCA TCT GGG T-3′), S269F-Fwd (5′-TAA CAG ATC TGG TTT CCA GCA GTG GAG A-3′) and S269F-Rev (5′-TCT CCA CTG CTG GAA ACC AGA TCT GTT A-3′), respectively. Infected Sf9 cells were disrupted by sonication and glass mortar and pestle treatment. VLPs were purified from cellular lysate by CsCl gradient and stored in buffer consisting of 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4 and 1.0 mM CaCl2. The 3-dimensional structure and integrity of VLPs was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy ( Figure 1 ). In short, JC-VLPs or BK-VLPs in 0.9% NaCl were placed on discharged pallodium coated mesh grids for 2 min; then washed twice with double distilled water, and once with freshly made 2% uranyl acetate. Another drop of 2% uranyl acetate was added for 10 sec. The grids were gently washed on drops of double distilled water and air dried before electron microscopy. The images were recorded in a FEI CM100 TEM transmission electron microscope (FEI, OR, USA), operating at 80 kV, and equipped with Veleta digital CCD camera (Olympus, Germany).
Ligand labeling procedures
VLPs in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were labeled with carrier-free Na125I, using Iodogen as described by the manufacturer (Pierce Chemicals), and separated from unbound 125I on a PD-10 column. The resulting specific radioactivity was approximately 4−7×106 cpm per µg protein. 125I-VLPs for injections were mixed with 0.9% NaCl to a final concentration of approximately 0.5 µg protein/100 µl ( = dose injected per mouse).
Fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled formaldehyde-denatured bovine serum albumin (FITC-FSA) was prepared by incubating FSA and FITC in sodium carbonate buffer (0.5 mol/L, pH 9.5) at a protein-dye ratio of 4∶1 at 4°C overnight, and dialyzed against PBS.
Blood clearance and organ distribution of radiolabeled VLPs
125I-BK-VLP, 125I-JC-VLP, 125I-JC-VLPL55F, or 125I-JC-VLPS269F (approximately 0.5 µg protein) were injected into the tail vein of anaesthetized mice (n = 3–5 per group). Immediately thereafter blood samples (5 µl) were collected over short time intervals from the tail tip, mixed with 0.3 ml of 13 mM citric acid, after which 0.3 ml 2% bovine serum albumin in water and 0.6 mL of 20% (wt/vol) trichloroacetic acid were added to the samples to precipitate non-degraded protein. Acid-soluble radioactivity represented degraded ligand [25]. To test if the higher doses of VLPs injected for immunohistochemistry would influence blood clearance and organ distribution, non-labeled JC-VLPs (15 µg = dose used for immunohistochemistry) were injected simultaneously with 125I-JC-VLPs (0.5 µg). This did not change the blood clearance or organ distribution pattern of the radiolabeled ligand. In some animals FSA (0.8 mg protein in100 µl 0.9% NaCl) was injected immediately before the administration of radiolabeled ligand to check for inhibition of blood clearance.
At the end of the monitoring period (10 min or 60 min) the anaesthetized animals were euthanized with 100% CO2. The abdomens and thoraces were opened, and the animals were perfused via the left cardiac ventricle (outlet via the right atrium) with PBS to remove free tracer from the vasculature before the organs were excised and analyzed for radioactivity. The amount of tracer recovered was considered the sum of radioactivity of individual organs and carcass without organs.
Hepatocellular distribution of 125I-VLPs
125I-BK-VLP, 125I-JC-VLP, 125I-JC-VLPL55F, or 125I-JC-VLPS269F (approximately 0.5 µg protein) was injected into the tail vein of anaesthetized mice (n = 3 per group). Ten minutes after the injection the animals were euthanized with 100% CO2 and liver cells isolated by collagenase perfusion of liver via the portal vein, before separating the dispersed liver cells into hepatocytes and NPCs [47]. All steps during cell isolation and separation, except the liver perfusion step, were carried out on ice/below 4°C. Radioactivity in the hepatocyte and NPC fractions was measured in a Packard Gamma Counter. Cell numbers were assessed by cell counting in a hemocytometer.
Immunohistochemistry and lectin histochemistry
Non-labeled BK-VLPs or JC-VLPs (13–18 µg protein per mouse) was injected into the tail vein of anaesthetized mice (n = 3–5 per ligand). The animals were euthanized after 7–15 min, then perfused with PBS through the left cardiac ventricle to remove blood and thereafter with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS with 0.02 M sucrose. The perfusion fixed tissues were dehydrated, paraffin embedded and sectioned. In some animals, FITC-FSA (50 µg protein per mouse) was injected into the tail vein 5 min after injection of 10 µg JC-VLP, JC-VLPL55F, or JC-VLPS269F, and the mice euthanized 10 min thereafter, before perfusion fixation and tissue preparation for immunohistochemistry as described above. Antigen retrieval was achieved by 30 min microwaving in citrate buffer, pH 6. Blocking buffer was 5% goat serum or 1% BSA in TBS and 0.05 M Tween 20, pH 8.4. Sections were incubated overnight (37°C) with primary antibodies ( Table 1 ) or non-immune IgG diluted in blocking buffer, washed and incubated with secondary antibody in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclear stain was Draq5 (diluted 1∶1000 in PBS). Sections were analysed in a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Lectin histochemistry on tissue sections
Biotinylated lectins, Sambuccus nigra agglutinin (SNA), and Maackia amurensis hemagglutinin (MAH), were purchased from Vector Laboratories (Vector Laboratories Inc, CA, USA), and Alexa555-streptavidin from Life Technologies ( Table 1 ). SNA recognizes alpha(2,6)-linked sialic acids, and MAH recognizes alpha(2,3)-linked sialic acids [49]. Lectin labeling of paraffin tissue sections of liver, kidney and spleen were done according to the instructions from Vector Laboratories.
Endocytosis experiments in isolated liver cells
Confocal microscopy
Primary NPC cultures, enriched in LSECs with approximately 10–20% Kupffer cells, were established on collagen coated glass cover slides. Since LSECs rapidly lose their in vivo uptake functions after isolation [50] endocytosis experiments were performed under serum-free conditions within 4 h of plating. Antibody markers for LSECs and Kupffer cells are listed in Table 1 . The cells were incubated with BK-VLP, JC-VLP, or BKV for 30 min-1 h, washed, fixed in 4% PFA in PBS/0.02 M sucrose for 15 min, immune labeled, and subjected to confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Immune EM
Purified LSECs (approximately 1.5 million cells in 8 cm2 Falcon wells) were incubated with 2.06E+10 genomic equivalents of CsCl gradient purified BKV in 1 ml serum-free RPMI 1640 medium for 2 h, washed in PBS and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in 200 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5, overnight, embedded in gelatin and 2.3 M sucrose, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Immune labeling of ultrathin cryosections was performed as described [51]. Positive BK-VP1 labeling was detected by protein A-conjugated 10 nm gold complexes. The dried sections were examined in a JOEL JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JOEL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 80 kV. Control experiments were included in parallel by omission of the primary antibody.
Statistics and pharmacokinetic analyses
The statistical calculations (Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA two-way analysis of variance) were performed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc. San Diego, CA). Clearance kinetics were analyzed as described [52].
Results
Removal of blood-borne BK- and JC-virus like particles (VLPs) was rapid, with JC-VLPs being cleared more efficiently than BK-VLPs
BK-VLPs and JC-VLPs were radiolabeled and injected via the tail vein. The rate of blood clearance of 125I-BK-VLP and 125I-JC-VLP is shown in Figure 2A, C . Semi-logarithmic decay plots revealed a biphasic pattern of elimination from blood, with an initial rapid t1/2 α of 1–2 min for both ligands ( Table 2 ). During this early phase the uptake from blood of 125I-BK-VLP and 125I-JC-VLP were 39% and 76%, respectively, revealing a considerably more effective initial blood clearance of JC-VLP than BK-VLP. After 60 min approximately 30% of the BK-VLP associated radioactivity was still in the circulation ( Figure 2A ), suggesting that BK-VLPs may interact with some unknown blood factor(s) protecting them from being taken up. In contrast, only 10% of JC-VLP associated radioactivity was left in blood after 30 min ( Figure 2C ).
Table 2. Rate of blood clearance of BK- or JC virus-like particles (VLPs) in mouse.
Ligand | t1/2 α (min)* | t1/2 β (min)* | Fraction (%) eliminated in α phase | Fraction (%) eliminated in β phase |
125I-BK-VLP | 2.06±0.90 | 42.85±9.51 | 39.18±6.30 | 60.82±6.30 |
125I-JC-VLP | 1.17±0.11 | 46.08±37.20 | 75.70±3.84 | 24.30±3.84 |
125I-JC-VLPL55F | 1.28±0.26 | 25.16±12.76 | 79.21±2.75 | 20.80±2.75 |
125I-JC-VLPS269F | 1.06±0.30 | 41.81±7.62 | 70.92±11.60 | 29.08±11.60 |
125I-BK-VLP+FSA | 0.91±0.71 | 33.5±7.69 | 56.17±26.73 | 43.89±26.73 |
125I-JC-VLP+FSA | 1.04±0.11 | 31.13±8.50 | 85.62±2.78 | 14.37±2.78 |
N = 3 in all groups except 125I-JC-VLP where n = 5. Results are given as mean ± SD.
*t1/2 α and t1/2 β were calculated as described in [52].
Intracellular degradation of 125I-labeled proteins normally generates 125I-tagged low molecular mass degradation products that are released from the cells, and can be measured in blood following trichloroacetic precipitation of intact proteins [25]. Acid soluble 125I-degradation products appeared in blood 10 min after injection of the radiolabeled VLPs ( Figure 2B, D ). In agreement with the more efficient blood clearance of JC-VLPs, more degradation products were released to blood after injection of 125I-JC-VLPs than after 125I-BK-VLP injection in the 60 min monitoring period.
BK- and JC-VLPs distributed to liver, with a minor uptake in spleen and kidney
To minimize the escape of label from the site of uptake due to intracellular ligand degradation, organ distribution of radiolabeled ligands was measured already 10 min after injection. At this point, the majority of the 125I-BK-VLP (48%) and 125I-JC-VLP (60%) associated radioactivity was found in liver, whereas spleen and kidneys contained 9% and 5% of the 125I-BK-VLPs, and 12% and 5% of the 125I-JC-VLPs, respectively ( Figure 3 ).
To investigate the kinetics of organ distribution the VLPs following administration, the liver-associated radioactivity was followed from 10 to 60 min after injection. For 125I-BK-VLP, liver-associated radioactivity decreased only slightly ( Figure 3A ), which may reflect that cellular uptake and degradation overlap due to the slower blood clearance of BK-VLP. In contrast, for 125I-JC-VLP, the liver-associated radioactivity decreased from 60% to 30% of total recovered radioactivity during the same time period ( Figure 3B ), indicating effective hepatocellular degradation of JC-VLP. A corresponding increase of radioactivity in the gastrointestinal tract (including mesenterium and lymph nodes) and the rest of carcass in the same period was judged to be caused by redistribution of degradation products, which is commonly noted following administration of 125I-labeled ligands [26].
To measure the relative contribution of different liver cells in the VLP uptake mice injected intravenously with 125I-labelled BK- or JC-VLPs were sacrificed after 10 min for liver cell isolation and separation into hepatocytes and NPCs, the latter consisting mainly of LSECs and some Kupffer cells, as described in Materials and Methods. The liver radioactivity was mainly associated with the NPC fraction ( Table 3 ).
Table 3. Liver uptake of BK- and JC-VLPs from blood takes place in NPCs.
Ratio of radioactivity in NPCs versus hepatocytes after injection of 125I-BK-VLPs | Ratio of radioactivity in NPCs versus hepatocytes after injection of 125I-JC-VLPs | ||
Mouse 1 | 6.5: 1 | Mouse 1 | 22.1: 1 |
Mouse 2 | 6.3: 1 | Mouse 2 | 29.8: 1 |
Mouse 3 | 26.5: 1 | Mouse 3 | 22.3: 1 |
Average | 13.1: 1 | Average | 24.8: 1 |
The mice were injected intravenously with 125I-labelled VLPs, approximately 0.5 µg per animal, and euthanized after 10 min. Liver cells were then isolated by in situ perfusion with collagenase, and separated by low-speed differential centrifugation and subsequent density centrifugation on a Percoll gradient [47]. Radioactivity (counts per minute) was measured in the purified hepatocyte fraction, and in the NPC fraction enriched in LSECs and Kupffer cells.
The liver uptake of BK- and JC-VLPs took place mainly in the sinusoidal endothelium
To identify the cellular distribution of VLPs in liver, non-labeled BK-VLPs or JC-VLPs were injected intravenously, and organs harvested after 7–15 min, fixed, paraffin embedded, and processed for immunohistochemistry using a rabbit antiserum against BK-VP1 [53] ( Table 1 ) that cross-reacts with JC-VP1.
In liver, BK- and JC-VLP staining was observed along the hepatic sinusoids, colocalizing with cells expressing the mannose receptor (LSEC marker) ( Figure 4A, B, D, E ; Figure S1), or in cells that had endocytosed the scavenger receptor ligand FITC-FSA, a functional LSEC marker [30], [54] ( Figure 4G–I ). In C57BL/6 mouse liver, the mannose receptor is expressed in LSECs but not in Kupffer cells [26]. Some uptake of BK- and JC-VLPs was also seen in F4/80 positive Kupffer cells ( Figure 4C, F ), whereas no BK- or JC-VLP positive staining was observed in hepatocytes, endothelial cells of portal venules or arteries, bile ducts or other liver structures.
To characterize in greater detail the cells involved in the hepatic uptake of polyomavirus, freshly isolated liver NPCs were incubated with infectious BKV, non-labeled BK-VLPs, or JC-VLPs for various time periods (30 min–1 h), immune labeled and subjected to confocal microscopy ( Figure 5A–F ). Both LSECs and Kupffer cells took up BK- and JC-VLPs, and BKV in vitro. Results were confirmed by double labeling with anti-BK-VP1 antiserum and antibodies against the mannose receptor (LSEC marker in liver [26]; Figure 5A–C ; Figure S2) or CD68 (Kupffer cell marker; Figure 5D–F ). Cryo-immune electron microscopy of purified LSEC cultures incubated with infectious BKV for 2 h showed virus accumulation in membrane-bound compartments ( Figure 5G, H ).
Liver uptake of blood-borne VLPs was not dependent on sialic acids
It is reported that BKV and JCV enter their natural host cells via carbohydrate receptors [55]. While BKV binds to alpha(2,3)-linked sialic acids on (for instance) gangliosides [56], JCV binds to alpha(2,6)-linked glycan lactoseries tetrasaccharide c (LSTc) [57]. To test whether blood clearance of JCV in mice is dependent on alpha(2,6)-linked sialic acids, we examined the elimination from blood of two JC-VLP variants occurring frequently in PML patients, namely JC-VLPL55F and JC-VLPS269F ( Figure 6A–D , Table 2 ), which had been shown to no longer hemagglutinate red blood cells and to have lost their respective sialic acid receptor binding properties [58]. These VLPs were constructed from mutant forms of the JCV capsid protein VP1, in which one amino acid in the sialic acid binding loop of VP1 had been substituted. The data show that 125I-JC-VLPL55F and 125I-JC-VLPS269F were removed from the circulation in a similar manner as the JC-VLPs made from Mad-1 JC-VP1 (named here as JC-VLP) ( Table 2 ). After 60 min nearly all 125I-JC-VLPL55F, and 80% of the 125I-JC-VLPS269F were eliminated from blood ( Figure 6A, C ). Similarly to the JC-VLPs, acid soluble 125I-degradation products appeared in the circulation already after 10 min ( Figure 6B, D ).
Organ distribution of 125I-JC-VLPL55F and 125I-JC-VLPS269F 60 min post injection ( Figure 6E ) was similar to that of JC-VLP ( Figure 3B ), with the highest radioactivity measured in liver. Notably, radioactivity in the brain was negligible. Hepatocellular distribution studies, monitoring radioactivity in hepatocytes and NPCs separated10 min after injection of radiolabeled ligands, showed that the uptake of 125I-JC-VLPL55F and 125I-JC-VLPS269F was predominantly in the NPC fraction ( Figure 6F ). Immunohistochemistry revealed an LSEC-like pattern of distribution along the sinusoids ( Figure 6G ), as with JC-VLP ( Figure 4 ). Of note, lectin histochemistry for SNA and MAH revealed that all hepatic endothelia expressed alpha(2,6)-linked-sialic acids and alpha(2,3)-linked sialic acids (Figure S3), whereas BK-VLPs and JC-VLPs (Mad-1 and mutants) distributed only to sinusoids ( Figures 4 , and 6 ), suggesting that these sialic acids are not essential for liver uptake.
The scavenger receptor ligand formaldehyde-denatured serum albumin (FSA) reduced the rate of intracellular degradation of JC-VLP, but did not interfere with VLP uptake in liver
LSECs mediate their effective blood clearance of most known ligands via a limited set of endocytosis receptors of broad ligand specificity [10]. To study if LSEC scavenger receptors were involved in the uptake of circulating BK-VLPs or JC-VLPs, a high dose of FSA (0.8 mg/mouse) was injected immediately prior to the injection of 125I-labeled VLPs. FSA is a soluble scavenger receptor ligand and is reported to distribute mainly to the LSEC after intravenous administration [59]. No effect was observed on the blood clearance kinetics of 125I-BK-VLP ( Table 2 ) or 125I-JC-VLP (Figure S4, Table 2 ). However, the release of 125I-JC-VLP degradation products to the blood (Figure S4-B) was slightly reduced by simultaneous FSA injection compared to injection of only 125I-JC-VLP ( Figure 2D ). This resulted in significantly more liver-associated radioactivity after 60 min (Figure S4-C) compared to injection of 125I-JC-VLP alone ( Figure 3B ), suggesting that metabolic turnover, but not uptake was rate limiting following targeting of the same cell by FSA and JC-VLP.
To investigate if the clearance of the VLPs was mediated by the mannose receptor, a C-type lectin with broad ligand binding properties and highly expressed in mouse, rat and human LSECs [15], [26], [43], mannose receptor deficient mice [46] were injected with 125I-JC-VLPs (Figure S5). These mice showed similar clearance and organ distribution of JC-VLPs as wild type mice ( Figures 2B , 3B ), indicating that the rapid JC-VLP blood clearance was not mediated by the mannose receptor pathway.
Extrahepatic clearance of blood-borne BK- and JC-VLPs took place in endothelial cells of kidney vasa recta segments, and in reticuloendothelial cells of spleen red pulp marginal zone
The organ distribution studies of radiolabelled ligands showed a minor, but significant uptake in kidney and spleen. This prompted us to examine the VLP uptake in these organs by immunohistochemistry.
In kidney, BK- and JC-VLP uptake was specifically associated with microvessels of renal medulla ( Figure 7A–D ). Staining intensity of positive vessels was distinct and strong. However, VLP uptake was not seen in all medullary vessels, suggesting discrimination between different segments of vasa recta. Most of the VLP staining did not overlap with staining for Meca 32 (syn. PV-1, a component of fenestral diaphragms) ( Figure 8A–F ), which label endothelial cells of fenestrated segments of vasa recta [60], [61]. This suggests that the BK- and JC-VLP uptake took place in non-fenestrated endothelial cells, which are located in descending segments of the vasa recta. Endothelial cells that took up VLPs also rapidly and selectively endocytosed FITC-FSA ( Figure 8G–I ), which in liver is a functional marker for LSECs [30], [54], [59], [62]. FITC-FSA uptake in kidney was seen in medullary vessels only, and the uptake showed little overlap with Meca 32 staining ( Figure 8J–L ). The distribution pattern of JC-VLP and FITC-FSA in kidney medullary vessels almost completely overlapped, suggesting the presence of a highly endocytically active endothelium in these vessels.
BK- and JC-VLPs also distributed to the transitional epithelium of the renal pelvis ( Figure 7G, H ), whereas glomeruli and tubular structures of the nephron were negative in all mice ( Figure 7E, F ) except for one animal injected with BK-VLP, which showed positive staining of a few glomeruli (not shown). Lectin histochemistry for SNA and MAH showed positive labeling of all endothelia in kidney (Figure S3).
In spleen, the BK- and JC-VLPs distributed to the marginal zone that separates the lymphocyte rich white pulp from the red pulp ( Figure 9 , and Figure S6). The VP1 labeling showed a net-like staining pattern in this region. Double immune labeling for VP1 and the macrophage marker F4/80 ( Figure 9A–C ), or CD31 ( Figure 9D–F ), which is expressed by many endothelial cells, revealed scattered co-localisation of VLPs with CD31 and F4/80 positive cells, suggesting that the marginal zone reticuloendothelial network of macrophages and endothelial cells are involved in VLP uptake in the spleen. Staining for the macrophage antigen CD163 [63] did not co-localize with VP1 staining ( Figure 9G–I ), indicating VLP uptake only in subsets of spleen red pulp macrophages. Some of the JC-VLP uptake in spleen co-localized with FITC-FSA which also distributed to the reticuloendothelium of the spleen red pulp marginal zone ( Figure 9J–L ).
Discussion
Clinical models of BKV and JCV infection demonstrating replicative pathologies with close correlation to nephropathy, cystitis or multifocal leukoencephalopathy are currently lacking. However, these viruses are recognized and taken up by cells from non-permissive hosts, including mice [37], [42], allowing us to study their cellular site of uptake in a mouse model. Primary infection with these viruses is believed to occur during early childhood, but their initial infection route or organ distribution is not well known. Using well characterized VLPs, we present evidence that LSECs are highly effective in clearing a large fraction of blood-borne BKV and JCV particles. Moreover, we observed that BK and JC VLPs are efficiently taken up in some microvessels of renal medulla and the spleen marginal zone reticuloendothelium. By effectively acting as a virion sink in the absence of specific antibodies, LSECs may play a key role in the mostly asymptomatic course of primary BKV and JCV infection, leaving only little virus to escape and reach the renal medulla (and possibly the spleen), an important site of BKV and JCV persistence [40], [41]. LSECs represent a highly specialized type of scavenger endothelium preserved across different vertebrate species including rodents and humans [10], [45]. Several signature characteristics are the same in LSECs across mammals: Cell morphology and endocytosis receptor expression in human LSECs are identical to that of rodents and pig [10], [11], [15], [43], [44], and the scavenger function of rat, mouse, and pig LSECs is strikingly similar [64]. It is therefore likely that our present findings on the efficient LSEC endocytosis of polyoma VLPs in mice reflect the fate of these viruses also in human livers.
The observed biphasic pattern of polyoma VLP clearance from blood, with a rapid α-phase and a slower β-phase is comparable to the clearance kinetics of many macromolecules and colloids that are efficiently eliminated via receptor-mediated endocytosis in the LSECs [15], [25], [26]. There were, nevertheless, some interesting differences between the BK-VLP and JC-VLP clearance patterns. While JC-VLPs were almost completely removed from the circulation within 10 minutes, the α-phase was less dominant in the elimination of BK-VLPs, suggesting a rapid saturation of BK binding/uptake receptors or interaction of BK-VLPs with blood factors (proteins or cells), delaying the blood clearance. Interestingly, in their natural host cells BKV is reported to be internalized via caveolin-mediated endocytosis whereas JCV enters via clathrin-mediated endocytosis [36]. This could also be an explanation of our results, because LSECs have well-developed clathrin-mediated endocytosis machinery, and rely heavily on this type of endocytosis to maintain their signature scavenging activity [34], [65].
Our hypothesis is that LSECs protect against virus infections, due to their very efficient endocytosis and high catabolic activity which rapidly destroy internalized material [10]. Our in vivo data indicate that at least JC-VLPs are rapidly degraded in the liver, as reported for other macromolecules taken up by the LSECs [10], [26]. In this context, it is of interest to note that BKV viremia is readily detectable in transplant patients with BKV-associated diseases, while JCV viremia is only rarely detected in patients with JCV-associated diseases [66] [67].
However, degradation of VLPs is not a proof of cellular destruction of infective virus, and to establish whether BKV or JCV uptake in LSECs will lead to destruction of all internalized virus particles, or allow for endosomal escape and intracellular replication of a fraction of the internalized virions would require further studies. However, in vitro model systems are currently lacking that recapitulate the known in vivo physiological activity of human LSECs, hence impeding such studies.
In addition to a major hepatic uptake, a minor, but significant BK-/JC-VLP uptake was also measured in spleen red pulp and kidney medulla. The spleen red pulp is known to harbor scavenger type of endothelia [10] and could thereby serve as a secondary site of BKV and JCV clearance. Of note, the rapid and specific uptake of polyoma virus or VLPs in kidney medullary vessels has to our knowledge not been reported before, and may reveal novel insights into the infection route of BKV and JCV. It is notable, however, that clinical recommendations emphasize the importance of medullary tissue for a sensitive tissue diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients [68]. Moreover, BKV infection of endothelial cells has been reported in a patient with AIDS and a renal transplant recipient [69], [70]. The kidney uptake reported in the present study was associated with the endothelial lining of distinct vasa recta segments. Most of the VLP-positive vessels did not express PV-1/Meca32, suggesting location of VLPs in the non-fenestrated, or descending part of vasa recta [61]. The VLP positive endothelial cells also efficiently endocytosed a functional LSEC marker and scavenger receptor ligand, FITC-FSA, suggesting high endocytic activity of these cells compared to other renal endothelia. Whether this uptake will aid in persistence or clearance of the infectious virus remains to be revealed.
The brain, which is the main site for JCV pathology (PML) [41], was not readily identified by the intravenously injected VLPs, as judged by the extremely low levels of radioactivity accumulating in this organ. This apparent lack of uptake in brain may be explained partly by the intact blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier of adult mammals. However, the steps in colonization of the brain by JCV are not well characterized and it is still unclear if this occurs during primary viremia or during reactivation [41], if it requires replication competent JCV as opposed to VLPs, or access via other cell types including B-lymphocytes and/or hematopoietic progenitor cells [71]. In addition to the usually distinct VP1 amino acid mutations found [58], virus causing PML bear a rearranged non-coding control region that increases the replication potential [72].
We tested the in vivo fate of VLPs of the two of the most frequently identified JCV mutants, namely JC-VLPL55F and JC-VLPS269F, both of which have lost their ability to bind alpha(2,6)-linked sialic acid residues on gangliosides, used by JCV for cellular entry [41], [58]. The rate of blood clearance was rapid, and organ distribution after 60 min was almost similar for Mad-1 and mutant JC-VLPs, suggesting that their blood clearance by scavenger cells did not depend on binding to alpha(2,6)-linked sialic acid receptors.
The high scavenging capacity of LSECs for most ligands is mediated by a limited set of high affinity endocytosis receptors [10]. Together with the mannose receptor, the scavenger receptors stabilin-1 and stabilin-2 are considered the main endocytic workhorses of these cells [10], [65], and are responsible for the uptake of a wide range of macromolecules, including oxidized LDLs, hyaluronan, chondroitin sulphate, procollagen propeptides, and advanced glycation end products [13], [30], [65]. Many serum proteins that are phosphorylated as a consequence of platelet activation and blood coagulation are also recognized by the LSEC scavenger receptors [73]. Recent data suggest that the VP1 molecules of BKV contain posttranslational modifications including phosphate groups [74]. FSA, a well-known ligand for the scavenger/stabilin receptors [30], [59] was unable to alter the clearance kinetics of blood-borne VLPs, suggesting that the LSEC scavenger receptors were not involved in the hepatic uptake of the particles. However, intracellular degradation of JC-VLPs in liver was significantly impaired. Together, these data suggest traffic of FSA and JC-VLP to the same degradation compartments, but via different receptors. However, we cannot exclude binding to different sites of the same endocytosis receptor, as non-reciprocal cross-competition is described for binding of FSA and hyaluronan to scavenger receptors/stabilin-2 in LSECs [11], [13], [25]. Mice deficient in the mannose receptor [46] showed similar clearance and organ distribution of BK/JC-VLPs as wild-type mice with normal expression of mannose receptor in LSECs. Although this is consistent with the fact that polyomavirus VLPs including BKV and JCV are not glycosylated [74], it should be noted that the mannose receptor has binding sites for non-glycosylated residues in addition to acting as a lectin [10], [75].
Conclusions
Mouse LSECs were identified as efficient scavengers of BK- and JC-VLPs. Despite this efficient clearance mechanism, the VLPs still reached the kidney which is a key organ of BKV and JCV persistence in humans. Of note, the kidney was targeted by VLPs, i.e. in the absence of virus replication. Here we identified uptake predominantly in endothelial cells of the non-fenestrated segments of vasa recta, which also possessed high endocytic activity towards the scavenger receptor ligand FITC-FSA, a hitherto unknown function of these renal endothelial cells. A better understanding of LSEC-mediated polyomavirus clearance may shed light into the role of these cells in the development of polyomavirus-associated diseases. Moreover, this may permit the development of strategies to harness this process for immunocompromised subjects at risk of polyoma virus replication.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Wenche Helen Bakkelund, Randi Olsen and Helga-Marie Bye, Department of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, for skilled technical assistance with histology sectioning and immune electron microscopy.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The work was supported by a grant from The Tromsø Research Foundation (Tromsø, Norway) to BS, and an institutional grant of the University of Basel (Basel, Switzerland) to HHH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Virgin HW (2014) The Virome in Mammalian Physiology and Disease. Cell 157: 142–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhang L, Dailey PJ, He T, Gettie A, Bonhoeffer S, et al. (1999) Rapid clearance of simian immunodeficiency virus particles from plasma of rhesus macaques. J Virol 73: 855–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mims CA (1959) The response of mice to large intravenous injections of ectromelia virus. II. The growth of virus in the liver. Br J Exp Pathol 40: 543–550. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Alemany R, Suzuki K, Curiel DT (2000) Blood clearance rates of adenovirus type 5 in mice. J Gen Virol 81: 2605–2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Inchley CJ (1969) The activity of mouse Kupffer cells following intravenous injection of T4 bacteriophage. Clin Exp Immunol 5: 173–187. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Green NK, Herbert CW, Hale SJ, Hale AB, Mautner V, et al. (2004) Extended plasma circulation time and decreased toxicity of polymer-coated adenovirus. Gene Ther 11: 1256–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ganesan LP, Mohanty S, Kim J, Clark KR, Robinson JM, et al. (2011) Rapid and Efficient Clearance of Blood-borne Virus by Liver Sinusoidal Endothelium. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Funk GA, Gosert R, Hirsch HH (2007) Viral dynamics in transplant patients: implications for disease. Lancet Infect Dis 7: 460–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jenne CN, Kubes P (2013) Immune surveillance by the liver. Nat Immunol 14: 996–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sorensen KK, McCourt P, Berg T, Crossley C, Couteur DL, et al. (2012) The scavenger endothelial cell: a new player in homeostasis and immunity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 303: R1217–1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Politz O, Gratchev A, McCourt PA, Schledzewski K, Guillot P, et al. (2002) Stabilin-1 and -2 constitute a novel family of fasciclin-like hyaluronan receptor homologues. Biochem J 362: 155–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Malerod L, Juvet K, Gjoen T, Berg T (2002) The expression of scavenger receptor class B, type I (SR-BI) and caveolin-1 in parenchymal and nonparenchymal liver cells. Cell Tissue Res 307: 173–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. McCourt PA, Smedsrod BH, Melkko J, Johansson S (1999) Characterization of a hyaluronan receptor on rat sinusoidal liver endothelial cells and its functional relationship to scavenger receptors. Hepatology 30: 1276–1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Magnusson S, Berg T (1989) Extremely rapid endocytosis mediated by the mannose receptor of sinusoidal endothelial rat liver cells. Biochem J 257: 651–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Malovic I, Sorensen KK, Elvevold KH, Nedredal GI, Paulsen S, et al. (2007) The mannose receptor on murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells is the main denatured collagen clearance receptor. Hepatology 45: 1454–1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Martin-Armas M, Simon-Santamaria J, Pettersen I, Moens U, Smedsrod B, et al. (2006) Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) is present in murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) and mediates the effect of CpG-oligonucleotides. J Hepatol 44: 939–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Uhrig A, Banafsche R, Kremer M, Hegenbarth S, Hamann A, et al. (2005) Development and functional consequences of LPS tolerance in sinusoidal endothelial cells of the liver. J Leukoc Biol 77: 626–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hosel M, Broxtermann M, Janicki H, Esser K, Arzberger S, et al. (2012) Toll-like receptor 2-mediated innate immune response in human nonparenchymal liver cells toward adeno-associated viral vectors. Hepatology 55: 287–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wu J, Meng Z, Jiang M, Zhang E, Trippler M, et al. (2010) Toll-like receptor-induced innate immune responses in non-parenchymal liver cells are cell type-specific. Immunology 129: 363–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mousavi SA, Sporstol M, Fladeby C, Kjeken R, Barois N, et al. (2007) Receptor-mediated endocytosis of immune complexes in rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells is mediated by FcgammaRIIb2. Hepatology 46: 871–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ganesan LP, Kim J, Wu Y, Mohanty S, Phillips GS, et al. (2012) FcgammaRIIb on liver sinusoidal endothelium clears small immune complexes. J Immunol 189: 4981–4988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Seckert CK, Renzaho A, Tervo HM, Krause C, Deegen P, et al. (2009) Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are a site of murine cytomegalovirus latency and reactivation. J Virol 83: 8869–8884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Li Y, Hao B, Kuai X, Xing G, Yang J, et al. (2009) C-type lectin LSECtin interacts with DC-SIGNR and is involved in hepatitis C virus binding. Mol Cell Biochem 327: 183–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Smedsrod B, Melkko J, Risteli L, Risteli J (1990) Circulating C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen is cleared mainly via the mannose receptor in liver endothelial cells. Biochem J 271: 345–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Melkko J, Hellevik T, Risteli L, Risteli J, Smedsrod B (1994) Clearance of NH2-terminal propeptides of types I and III procollagen is a physiological function of the scavenger receptor in liver endothelial cells. J Exp Med 179: 405–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Elvevold K, Simon-Santamaria J, Hasvold H, McCourt P, Smedsrod B, et al. (2008) Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells depend on mannose receptor-mediated recruitment of lysosomal enzymes for normal degradation capacity. Hepatology 48: 2007–2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Smedsrod B, Melkko J, Araki N, Sano H, Horiuchi S (1997) Advanced glycation end products are eliminated by scavenger-receptor-mediated endocytosis in hepatic sinusoidal Kupffer and endothelial cells. Biochem J 322 (Pt 2): 567–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Svistounov D, Oteiza A, Zykova SN, Sorensen KK, McCourt P, et al. (2013) Hepatic disposal of advanced glycation end products during maturation and aging. Exp Gerontol 48: 549–556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Van Berkel TJ, De Rijke YB, Kruijt JK (1991) Different fate in vivo of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein and acetylated low density lipoprotein in rats. Recognition by various scavenger receptors on Kupffer and endothelial liver cells. J Biol Chem 266: 2282–2289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li R, Oteiza A, Sorensen KK, McCourt P, Olsen R, et al. (2011) Role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and stabilins in elimination of oxidized low-density lipoproteins. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300: G71–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Skogh T, Blomhoff R, Eskild W, Berg T (1985) Hepatic uptake of circulating IgG immune complexes. Immunology 55: 585–594. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Asumendi A, Alvarez A, Martinez I, Smedsrod B, Vidal-Vanaclocha F (1996) Hepatic sinusoidal endothelium heterogeneity with respect to mannose receptor activity is interleukin-1 dependent. Hepatology 23: 1521–1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Jacobs F, Wisse E, De Geest B (2010) The role of liver sinusoidal cells in hepatocyte-directed gene transfer. Am J Pathol 176: 14–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kjeken R, Mousavi SA, Brech A, Gjoen T, Berg T (2001) Fluid phase endocytosis of [125I]iodixanol in rat liver parenchymal, endothelial and Kupffer cells. Cell Tissue Res 304: 221–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Seternes T, Sorensen K, Smedsrod B (2002) Scavenger endothelial cells of vertebrates: a nonperipheral leukocyte system for high-capacity elimination of waste macromolecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 7594–7597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Neu U, Stehle T, Atwood WJ (2009) The Polyomaviridae: Contributions of virus structure to our understanding of virus receptors and infectious entry. Virology 384: 389–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Suzuki S, Sawa H, Komagome R, Orba Y, Yamada M, et al. (2001) Broad distribution of the JC virus receptor contrasts with a marked cellular restriction of virus replication. Virology 286: 100–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Goldmann C, Petry H, Frye S, Ast O, Ebitsch S, et al. (1999) Molecular cloning and expression of major structural protein VP1 of the human polyomavirus JC virus: formation of virus-like particles useful for immunological and therapeutic studies. J Virol 73: 4465–4469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tsai B, Qian M (2010) Cellular entry of polyomaviruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 343: 177–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hirsch HH (2005) BK virus: opportunity makes a pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 41: 354–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hirsch HH, Kardas P, Kranz D, Leboeuf C (2013) The human JC polyomavirus (JCPyV): virological background and clinical implications. APMIS 121: 685–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tan CS, Broge TA Jr, Seung E, Vrbanac V, Viscidi R, et al. (2013) Detection of JC virus-specific immune responses in a novel humanized mouse model. PLoS One 8: e64313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Martens JH, Kzhyshkowska J, Falkowski-Hansen M, Schledzewski K, Gratchev A, et al. (2006) Differential expression of a gene signature for scavenger/lectin receptors by endothelial cells and macrophages in human lymph node sinuses, the primary sites of regional metastasis. J Pathol 208: 574–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lalor PF, Lai WK, Curbishley SM, Shetty S, Adams DH (2006) Human hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells can be distinguished by expression of phenotypic markers related to their specialised functions in vivo. World J Gastroenterol 12: 5429–5439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Esbach S, Pieters MN, van der Boom J, Schouten D, van der Heyde MN, et al. (1993) Visualization of the uptake and processing of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in human and rat liver. Hepatology 18: 537–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lee SJ, Evers S, Roeder D, Parlow AF, Risteli J, et al. (2002) Mannose receptor-mediated regulation of serum glycoprotein homeostasis. Science 295: 1898–1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Smedsrod B (2012) Protocol for the preparation of mouse liver Kupffer cells and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Munin open research archive: University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. pp. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10037/14575.
- 48. Bodaghi S, Comoli P, Bosch R, Azzi A, Gosert R, et al. (2009) Antibody responses to recombinant polyomavirus BK large T and VP1 proteins in young kidney transplant patients. J Clin Microbiol 47: 2577–2585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Brinkman-Van der Linden EC, Sonnenburg JL, Varki A (2002) Effects of sialic acid substitutions on recognition by Sambucus nigra agglutinin and Maackia amurensis hemagglutinin. Anal Biochem 303: 98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Martinez I, Nedredal GI, Oie CI, Warren A, Johansen O, et al. (2008) The influence of oxygen tension on the structure and function of isolated liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Comp Hepatol 7: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Slot JW, Geuze HJ (2007) Cryosectioning and immunolabeling. Nat Protoc 2: 2480–2491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hellevik T, Bondevik A, Smedsrod B (1996) Intracellular fate of endocytosed collagen in rat liver endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res 223: 39–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Rinaldo CH, Myhre MR, Alstad H, Nilssen O, Traavik T (2003) Human polyomavirus BK (BKV) transiently transforms and persistently infects cultured osteosarcoma cells. Virus Res 93: 181–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Xie G, Wang L, Wang X, DeLeve LD (2010) Isolation of periportal, midlobular, and centrilobular rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells enables study of zonated drug toxicity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 299: G1204–1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Olofsson S, Bergstrom T (2005) Glycoconjugate glycans as viral receptors. Ann Med 37: 154–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Neu U, Allen SA, Blaum BS, Liu Y, Frank M, et al. (2013) A structure-guided mutation in the major capsid protein retargets BK polyomavirus. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Neu U, Maginnis MS, Palma AS, Stroh LJ, Nelson CD, et al. (2010) Structure-function analysis of the human JC polyomavirus establishes the LSTc pentasaccharide as a functional receptor motif. Cell Host Microbe 8: 309–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gorelik L, Reid C, Testa M, Brickelmaier M, Bossolasco S, et al. (2011) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) development is associated with mutations in JC virus capsid protein VP1 that change its receptor specificity. J Infect Dis 204: 103–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Blomhoff R, Eskild W, Berg T (1984) Endocytosis of formaldehyde-treated serum albumin via scavenger pathway in liver endothelial cells. Biochem J 218: 81–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Stan RV, Kubitza M, Palade GE (1999) PV-1 is a component of the fenestral and stomatal diaphragms in fenestrated endothelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 13203–13207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Pannabecker TL, Dantzler WH (2007) Three-dimensional architecture of collecting ducts, loops of Henle, and blood vessels in the renal papilla. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Elvevold K, Smedsrod B, Martinez I (2008) The liver sinusoidal endothelial cell: a cell type of controversial and confusing identity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 294: G391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Lau SK, Chu PG, Weiss LM (2004) CD163: a specific marker of macrophages in paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol 122: 794–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Elvevold KH, Nedredal GI, Revhaug A, Smedsrod B (2004) Scavenger properties of cultivated pig liver endothelial cells. Comp Hepatol 3: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Hansen B, Longati P, Elvevold K, Nedredal GI, Schledzewski K, et al. (2005) Stabilin-1 and stabilin-2 are both directed into the early endocytic pathway in hepatic sinusoidal endothelium via interactions with clathrin/AP-2, independent of ligand binding. Exp Cell Res 303: 160–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Egli A, Infanti L, Dumoulin A, Buser A, Samaridis J, et al. (2009) Prevalence of polyomavirus BK and JC infection and replication in 400 healthy blood donors. J Infect Dis 199: 837–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Drachenberg CB, Hirsch HH, Papadimitriou JC, Gosert R, Wali RK, et al. (2007) Polyomavirus BK versus JC replication and nephropathy in renal transplant recipients: a prospective evaluation. Transplantation 84: 323–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Hirsch HH, Randhawa P (2013) Practice ASTIDCo (2013) BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 13 Suppl 4 179–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Petrogiannis-Haliotis T, Sakoulas G, Kirby J, Koralnik IJ, Dvorak AM, et al. (2001) BK-related polyomavirus vasculopathy in a renal-transplant recipient. N Engl J Med 345: 1250–1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Vallbracht A, Lohler J, Gossmann J, Gluck T, Petersen D, et al. (1993) Disseminated BK type polyomavirus infection in an AIDS patient associated with central nervous system disease. Am J Pathol 143: 29–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Ferenczy MW, Marshall LJ, Nelson CD, Atwood WJ, Nath A, et al. (2012) Molecular biology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, the JC virus-induced demyelinating disease of the human brain. Clin Microbiol Rev 25: 471–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gosert R, Kardas P, Major EO, Hirsch HH (2010) Rearranged JC virus noncoding control regions found in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy patient samples increase virus early gene expression and replication rate. J Virol 84: 10448–10456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hansen B, Melkko J, Smedsrod B (2002) Serum is a rich source of ligands for the scavenger receptor of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem 229: 63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Fang CY, Chen HY, Wang M, Chen PL, Chang CF, et al. (2010) Global analysis of modifications of the human BK virus structural proteins by LC-MS/MS. Virology 402: 164–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Napper CE, Drickamer K, Taylor ME (2006) Collagen binding by the mannose receptor mediated through the fibronectin type II domain. Biochem J 395: 579–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the Supporting Information files.