Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2013 Jun 7;98(10):1432–1445. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.073064

Elevated blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature in mice lacking the XLαs protein of the Gnas locus is due to increased sympathetic tone

Nicolas Nunn 1,†, Claire H Feetham 2, Jennifer Martin 1, Richard Barrett-Jolley 2,*, Antonius Plagge 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4223506  PMID: 23748904

Abstract

New Findings

  • What is the central question of this study?

    Previously, we showed that Gnasxl knock-out mice are lean and hypermetabolic, with increased sympathetic stimulation of adipose tissue. Do these mice also display elevated sympathetic cardiovascular tone? Is the brain glucagon-like peptide-1 system involved?

  • What is the main finding and its importance?

    Gnasxl knock-outs have increased blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature. Heart rate variability analysis suggests an elevated sympathetic tone. The sympatholytic reserpine had stronger effects on blood pressure, heart rate and heart rate variability in knock-out compared with wild-type mice. Stimulation of the glucagon-like peptide-1 system inhibited parasympathetic tone to a similar extent in both genotypes, with a stronger associated increase in heart rate in knock-outs. Deficiency of Gnasxl increases sympathetic cardiovascular tone.

Imbalances of energy homeostasis are often associated with cardiovascular complications. Previous work has shown that Gnasxl-deficient mice have a lean and hypermetabolic phenotype, with increased sympathetic stimulation of adipose tissue. The Gnasxl transcript from the imprinted Gnas locus encodes the trimeric G-protein subunit XLαs, which is expressed in brain regions that regulate energy homeostasis and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. To determine whether Gnasxl knock-out (KO) mice display additional SNS-related phenotypes, we have now investigated the cardiovascular system. The Gnasxl KO mice were ∼20 mmHg hypertensive in comparison to wild-type (WT) littermates (P≤ 0.05) and hypersensitive to the sympatholytic drug reserpine. Using telemetry, we detected an increased waking heart rate in conscious KOs (630 ± 10 versus 584 ± 12 beats min−1, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05). Body temperature was also elevated (38.1 ± 0.3 versus 36.9 ± 0.4°C, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05). To investigate autonomic nervous system influences, we used heart rate variability analyses. We empirically defined frequency power bands using atropine and reserpine and verified high-frequency (HF) power and low-frequency (LF) LF/HF power ratio to be indicators of parasympathetic and sympathetic activity, respectively. The LF/HF power ratio was greater in KOs and more sensitive to reserpine than in WTs, consistent with elevated SNS activity. In contrast, atropine and exendin-4, a centrally acting agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor, which influences cardiovascular physiology and metabolism, reduced HF power equally in both genotypes. This was associated with a greater increase in heart rate in KOs. Mild stress had a blunted effect on the LF/HF ratio in KOs consistent with elevated basal sympathetic activity. We conclude that XLαs is required for the inhibition of sympathetic outflow towards cardiovascular and metabolically relevant tissues.

It has been increasingly recognized over recent years that disorders of energy balance and metabolism are often associated with cardiovascular disease. Typically, these symptoms occur jointly when central effects are involved. Specifically, the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) has been recognized as a major regulator of metabolic rate and cardiovascular physiology (Matsumura et al. 2003; Hall et al. 2010; Malpas, 2010). Obesity-related cardiovascular symptoms involve central actions of the adipokine leptin, its downstream effector, the melanocortin system, and subsequently increased sympathetic nerve activity (Hall et al. 2010). Much less is known about cardiovascular complications in disorders of hypermetabolism and leanness. Genetic manipulations of the renin–angiotensin system have been shown to increase metabolic rate and affect blood pressure (BP) through central as well as peripheral mechanisms (Dupont & Brouwers, 2010; Grobe et al. 2010). Another model with elevated sympathetic and cardiovascular tone is the Schlager inbred mouse line, which also displays reduced body weight (Davern et al. 2009). However, the underlying genetic cause for their phenotype is unknown. The anatomical organization of brain regions involved in the control of sympathetic activity is well known, although any differential topographical regulation of SNS outflow towards distinct peripheral tissues is less clear (Sved et al. 2001; Malpas, 2010; Nunn et al. 2011). Retrograde tracing studies from various peripheral tissues have indicated a common set of hierarchically organized brainstem and hypothalamic areas to be involved in the control of SNS outflow to diverse organs (Sved et al. 2001).

In this study, we analyse mice deficient for XLαs, a G-protein α-subunit encoded by the Gnasxl transcript of the complex Gnas locus (Plagge et al. 2008). Gnasxl constitutes an alternative splice variant of Gnas and differs only in the NH2-terminal exon (Fig. S1). Like Gsα, XLαs links a number of G-protein-coupled receptors in vitro, which results in activation of adenylate cyclase and production of cAMP (Liu et al. 2011). However, the specific receptor(s) that signal through XLαs in vivo remain unknown. Gene expression at the Gnas locus is regulated by the epigenetic mechanism of ‘genomic imprinting’, which leads to the silencing of one allele depending on its parental origin (Plagge et al. 2008). Thus, Gnasxl expression occurs exclusively from the paternal allele. By contrast, Gnas remains expressed biallelically in most cells, with the exception of some tissues where its expression is restricted to the maternal allele, e.g. in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus (Fig. S1; Chen et al. 2009). Loss of XLαs in mice results in a lean and hypermetabolic phenotype, caused by increased sympathetic stimulation of brown and white adipose tissues, and it has been proposed that there may be a systemic increase in SNS outflow (Xie et al. 2006). Expression of XLαs in adult mice is limited almost exclusively to the brain and correlates with SNS control centres, including the intermediolateral layer (IML) of the spinal cord, the ventrolateral medulla, medullary raphe nuclei, the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS), hypothalamic nuclei (PVN, dorsomedial nucleus, lateral hypothalamic area, arcuate and suprachiasmatic nuclei) and the preoptic area (Pasolli & Huttner, 2001; Krechowec et al. 2012). Its expression in regions such as the PVN and dorsomedial nucleus suggests that it may influence wider sympathetic outflow, including targets within the cardiovascular system (Coote, 2007; Womack et al. 2007).

Here, we explore the cardiovascular phenotype of Gnasxl knock-out (KO) mice and its regulation by the autonomic nervous system. The effects of inhibition of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), respectively, were examined using reserpine, which blocks the vesicular monoamine transporter at synapses, and atropine, which inhibits muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (Janssen et al. 2000; Young & Davisson, 2011). To begin an investigation into potentially deregulated neuropeptide systems that might be involved in the Gnasxl KO phenotype, we explored responses to activation of the brain glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) system. Glucagon-like peptide-1, apart from its peripheral role, also acts as a neuropeptide produced in the NTS of the medulla (Llewellyn-Smith et al. 2011). As the GLP-1 receptor signals via an α-stimulatory G-protein and cAMP, this pathway could potentially be affected in XLαs KO mice. Activation of the central GLP-1 receptor has dual autonomic effects. It inhibits parasympathetic control of the cardiovascular system, resulting in increased heart rate (HR) and BP (Barragan et al. 1999; Yamamoto et al. 2002; Hayes et al. 2008; Griffioen et al. 2011), while it also stimulates sympathetic outflow towards metabolically relevant tissues (Nogueiras et al. 2009). Furthermore, the c-fos response to the comparatively stable GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4 (Ex-4), which elicits identical central effects independent of its route of injection (intraperitoneal or intracerebroventricular), coincides with brain regions that control sympathetic outflow in the hypothalamus, medulla and spinal cord (Yamamoto et al. 2002; Baraboi et al. 2011).

In this study, we present BP and HR data obtained from anaesthetized and conscious mice, respectively. Autonomic influences on HR were examined by heart rate variability (HRV) analyses. Heart rate and HRV responses to reserpine, atropine, Ex-4 and handling stress were measured. Additionally, neuronal activation in response to Ex-4 was quantified histologically via c-fos expression analysis in wild-type (WT) and KO mice.

Methods

Ethical approval

All animal work was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the University of Liverpool and carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (UK Home Office Project Licences PPL40/3009 and PPL40/3351). All surgery was performed under general anaesthesia as described in detail below.

Animals

Gnasxl mutant mice (Plagge et al. 2004) were maintained on a CD1 background. Gnasxl KO offspring (Gnasxlm+/p−, i.e. lacking XLαs expression from the paternally inherited allele) were produced by mating CD1 females with Gnasxl mutation-carrying males. All experiments were performed on young adult (∼4-month-old) male Gnasxl KO and WT siblings. Mice were maintained in the animal facility of the University of Liverpool on a 12 h–12 h light–dark cycle and had unlimited access to water and standard chow diet.

Blood pressure recordings and body temperature measurements

For BP recordings via tail volume pressure recording (VPR) plethysmography, which measures systolic and diastolic pressure (CODA VPR system; Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT, USA), mice were lightly anaesthetized (urethane, 1.5 mg kg−1 i.p.; Sigma-Aldrich, UK) and kept in thermoneutral conditions (ambient temperature 30°C) throughout recording, which commonly results in lower BP values compared with conscious mice at room temperature (Swoap et al. 2004). A minimum of 10 readings were taken from each mouse; any values with low (<15 ml) displacement values were disregarded. For BP recordings via cannulation, mice were anaesthetized with urethane (1.4–2.2 mg kg−1) and α-chloralose (7–11 μg kg−1; Sigma-Aldrich, UK), administered i.p. in saline; doses were matched within sibling groups. Body temperature was recorded by rectal probe 3 min after injection of anaesthetic agents and prior to application of external heat. After this, temperature was continuously monitored and maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C by heat pad and infra-red lamp. Following loss of reflexes, the trachea was intubated to facilitate breathing, and the carotid artery was cannulated with stretched PP25 tubing filled with heparinized saline, connected to a pressure transducer. The raw blood pressure signal was digitized to a PC with a CED Micro1401 (CED, Cambridge, UK) using Spike2 at 5 kHz. The raw signal was also split, AC coupled and amplified between 10 and 100 times, depending on signal strength, and recorded on Spike2 at 5 kHz. Heartbeats were annotated to the amplified AC-coupled blood pressure signal using Wabp from the Physionet suite of programs (Goldberger et al. 2000). The numbers of animals used are indicated in the Results section.

Telemetry surgery, recording and mild stress handling

Electrocardiogram transmitters (ETA-F20; Data Sciences International, St Paul, MN, USA) were implanted subcutaneously into adult mice under isoflurane–N2O gas anaesthesia. The mice were given preoperative s.c. injections of the analgesic buprenorphine (Temgesic, 1.5 mg kg−1; Reckitt Benckiser, Slough, UK), the antibiotic enrofloxacin (Baytril, 0.2 ml kg−1; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and the anti-inflammatory meloxicam (Metacam, 100 μg kg−1; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany). The mice were monitored postoperatively, and were allowed at least 5 days of recovery before any further procedures were begun. This recovery period was found to be sufficient for the re-establishment of normal HR patterns (Thireau et al. 2008); we observed no differences compared with data from later time points. Mice were housed individually over receiver pads (Data Sciences International); ECG and locomotor activity were recorded continuously. The ECG signal was digitized to a PC with a CED Micro1401 using Spike2 at 5 kHz; locomotor activity was recorded at 100 Hz. Heart rate and locomotor activity were annotated using a custom program. Mild stress was induced by handling of the mice (restrained by holding the scruff; Meijer et al. 2006). Heart rate responses were evaluated between 120 and 180 min after reserpine injection, for 15 min after stress, and between 60 and 120 min after injection of atropine and Ex-4. The numbers of animals used are indicated in the Results section.

Heart rate variability

Heart rate variability analysis was performed using the Kubios HRV program (Niskanen et al. 2004). For power spectrum analysis, HR was resampled at 20 Hz, and 3 min sections of clean and stable HR were analysed by fast Fourier transform using Welch’s periodogram with 50% overlapping windows of 32 s. Low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) bandings were 0.15–1.0 and 1.0–5.0 Hz, respectively (see results for further details).

For analysis of HRV at night, a minimum of 10 3 min sections were selected for each mouse during a 5 h period between 20.00 and 01.00 h. This period was chosen to reflect the time of highest HR and activity (see Fig. 2A and C).

Figure 2. Circadian heart rate (HR), activity and HR responses in conscious Gnasxl KO mice .

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Heart rate and activity were recorded continuously in freely moving KO mice and WT siblings via ECG telemetry. A, 1 h averaged circadian HR over 24 h. Significantly different time points are indicated (*P≤ 0.05, n= 12, repeated-measures ANOVA). Filled bar, night period; open bar, day period. B, mean HR is increased at night in KO compared with WT mice (*P≤ 0.05), but did not reach significance during the daytime. C, 1 h averaged circadian activity over 24 h. D, mean activity is unchanged in KO compared with WT mice. E–G, treatments and HR recordings were undertaken during the light period. E, following i.p. injection of 1 mg kg−1 of the sympatholytic reserpine the HR was significantly decreased in KO mice and trended to be lower in WT mice. F, HR was significantly increased in KO mice following i.p. injection of 2 mg kg−1 of the parasympatholytic atropine. G, HR was significantly increased, to a similar extent, in both genotypes following mild handling stress. *P≤ 0.05 by Student’s paired t test. Error bars indicate SEM.

Peripheral drug injections

Reserpine (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was dissolved in 1% acetic acid solution; it was injected at 2 mg kg−1 in anaesthetized mice (cannulation experiments) and at 1 mg kg−1 in conscious mice (telemetry experiments). Atropine (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) and Ex-4 (Tocris, UK) were dissolved in physiological saline (0.9% NaCl) and injected at doses of 2 mg kg−1 and 50 μg kg−1, respectively. All injections were performed i.p. in 50 μl volume.

c-fos immunostaining

Exendin-4 was injected i.p. at 50 μg kg−1; 2 h later mice were terminally anaesthetized with Pentobarbitone (Pentoject, Animalcare, York, UK; 160 mg kg−1 i.p.) and perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Tissues were removed, dehydrated with 30% sucrose in PBS and coronal cryostat sections prepared. c-fos immunohistochemistry was performed using rabbit anti-c-fos primary antibody (Ab5, 1:50,000 dilution; Calbiochem-Merck, Feltham, UK), followed by signal amplification using the VECTASTAIN Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) with diaminobenzidine with 0.05% (w/v) NiCl2 substrate (Sigma-Aldrich, UK). Immunofluorescence was used to co-localize c-fos with XLαs on WT brain sections after Ex-4 stimulation. The same c-fos primary antibody (1:2000 dilution) was combined with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 488 secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution; Life Technologies, Paisley, UK); XLαs was detected using primary goat anti-XLαs (sc-18993, 1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany) and donkey anti-goat Alexa 594 secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution; Life Technologies). Tissues from five WT and five KO mice were analysed.

Statistical analyses

For the measurements in anaesthetized dose-matched siblings, Student’s paired t tests were used (Minitab Ltd, Coventry, UK). Except where stated otherwise, the telemetry data were analysed by Student’s unpaired t tests or repeated-measures ANOVA (for circadian time points). All graphs show data as means ± SEM.

Results

Elevated BP in Gnasxl KO mice

Blood pressure was recorded from lightly anaesthetized male Gnasxl KO mice and their WT littermates via tail VPR plethysmography in thermoneutral conditions. We found mean BP to be significantly higher in KO mice than in WT siblings (Fig. 1A; 84 ± 6 versus 64 ± 4 mmHg, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05, n= 9 and 8). Responses to the sympatholytic drug reserpine were recorded via arterial cannulation, to allow continuous measurement of BP. Knock-out mice had a significantly greater response to reserpine than WT mice (Fig. 1B; −7 ± 1 versus−1 ± 2 mmHg, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05, n= 5). Responses to vehicle were similar in both genotypes (data not shown). These findings suggest that elevated sympathetic activity could be the underlying cause for the increased BP in mutant mice. Additionally, and in line with the previously described elevated energy expenditure (Xie et al. 2006), KO mice had elevated body temperature (Fig. 1C; 38.1 ± 0.3 versus 36.9 ± 0.4°C, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05, n= 7).

Figure 1. Blood pressure (BP), reserpine response and body temperature in anaesthetized Gnasxl knock-out (KO) mice .

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A, mean basal BP (MAP) measured via tail volume pressure recording plethysmography under light general anaesthesia and thermoneutral conditions was significantly increased in KO mice compared with wild-type (WT) mice (*P≤ 0.05, n= 9 and 8). The systolic and diastolic data for these mice are as follows: systolic, WT 76.7 ± 5.1 mmHg versus KO 102.6 ± 6.4 mmHg, P= 0.0072; and diastolic, WT 58.3 ± 4.2 mmHg versus KO 74.9 ± 6.4 mmHg, P= 0.053. B, the BP change in response to reserpine was significantly greater in KO compared with WT mice, relative to vehicle, as measured via arterial cannulation (*P≤ 0.05, n= 5). C, KO mice had significantly elevated body temperature as measured via rectal probe (*P≤ 0.05, n= 7). Error bars indicate SEM.

Increased basal HR in conscious Gnasxl KO mice

Heart rate data were obtained in anaesthesia-free conditions following subcutaneous implantation of telemetric transmitters. The ECG was recorded continuously in freely moving mice, and HR was derived using a custom program (see Fig. S2 for representative telemetry data). Circadian variation in HR and locomotor activity were plotted as averages per hour over a 24 h period (Fig. 2A and C). Heart rate was found to be significantly higher in KO mice at several circadian time points (Fig. 2A). Mean HR over 12 h day or night periods was significantly increased in KO mice compared with WT mice during the active night period (Fig. 2B; 630 ± 10 versus 584 ± 12 beats min−1, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05, n= 12), while only a trend was observed during daytime. However, no difference in locomotor activity between genotypes was found (Fig. 2D).

Autonomic control of HR in conscious Gnasxl KO mice

The cause of the elevated HR in Gnasxl KO mice was investigated by injection of reserpine and atropine to inhibit sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation, respectively, of the cardiovascular system (Janssen et al. 2000; Young & Davisson, 2011). All treatments were carried out during the daytime (light) period. Reserpine at a dose of 1 mg kg−1 i.p. caused a significant decrease in HR in KO mice (Fig. 2E; KO, from 531 ± 23 to 455 ± 12 beats min−1, P≤ 0.05, n= 8; and WT, from 516 ± 21 to 471 ± 41 beats min−1, n.s., n= 8; Student’s paired t test). Atropine at a dose of 2 mg kg−1 i.p. caused a significant increase in HR in KO mice (Fig. 2F; from 551 ± 16 to 591 ± 19 beats min−1, P≤ 0.05, Student’s paired t test, n= 6), but not in WT siblings (from 533 ± 28 to 552 ± 17 beats min−1, n= 6). These data, combined with the HRV analysis described below, which shows the effects of reserpine and atropine more clearly, suggest that increased sympathetic tone causes elevated HR in Gnasxl-deficient mice and that inhibition of the parasympathetic system emphasizes this effect. Additionally, we investigated the cardiovascular reactivity of KO mice to mild handling stress (Meijer et al. 2006). Heart rate increased to a similar degree in response to stress in both WT mice (Fig. 2G; from 568 ± 7 to 675 ± 39 beats min−1, P≤ 0.05, n= 9) and KO mice (from 615 ± 20 to 716 ± 11 beats min−1, P≤ 0.05, n= 9).

Analysis of HRV

In the context of abnormal HR phenotypes, HRV analysis, especially the ratio of LF to HF HRV bandings, can provide additional information on sympathetic versus parasympathetic balance (Malpas, 2002; Baudrie et al. 2007; Laude et al. 2008; Thireau et al. 2008). We used this approach via power spectrum analysis and tested autonomic influences on the cardiovascular system in conscious mice. The LF and HF HRV bandings were validated empirically following inhibition of sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular tone of WT mice with reserpine and atropine, respectively (Fig. S3). High-frequency power was then used to indicate the degree of parasympathetic stimulation of the cardiovascular system, and the LF/HF ratio was used to indicate the degree of sympathetic stimulation, specifically as a measure of sympathovagal balance (Young & Davisson, 2011).

Autonomic control of HRV in conscious Gnasxl KO mice was examined by measuring LF/HF responses to reserpine, as well as HF power responses to atropine during the day (light) period. The LF/HF ratio was significantly reduced by reserpine in both WT and KO mice (Fig. 3A; WT, from 1.38 ± 0.31 to 0.47 ± 0.09, P≤ 0.05; and KO, from 1.39 ± 0.22 to 0.26 ± 0.06, P≤ 0.05; both by Student’s paired t test, n= 8). However, the decrease in LF/HF ratio was significantly greater in KO compared with WT mice (Fig. 3B; −80 ± 5 versus−48 ± 13%, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05, n= 8). High-frequency power was significantly reduced in response to atropine in both WT and KO mice (Fig. 3C; WT, from 3.0 ± 0.6 to 1.2 ± 0.5 ms2 Hz−1, P≤ 0.05; and KO, from 2.7 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 0.2 ms2 Hz−1, P≤ 0.05; both by Student’s paired t test, n= 6). There was no difference in HF power decrease between WT and KO (Fig. 3D; −61 ± 16 versus−77 ± 6% in WT versus KO, n= 6). Finally, with regard to the stress response, mean LF/HF ratio was increased in WT (Fig. 3E; from 1.12 ± 0.15 to 1.85 ± 0.29, P≤ 0.05, n= 8) but not in KO mice (from 1.83 ± 0.46 to 1.62 ± 0.45), whose basal LF/HF ratio was already as high as that of the stressed WT siblings. The relative change in LF/HF ratio was short of a significant difference between both genotypes (Fig. 3F).

Figure 3. Heart rate variability (HRV) responses .

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Treatments and HR recordings by telemetry in conscious Gnasxl KOs and WT siblings were carried out during the light period. Low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio was used as an indicator of sympathetic stimulation of the cardiovascular system, specifically of sympathovagal balance, and HF power as an indicator of parasympathetic stimulation. A, WT and KO mice had a significant decrease in LF/HF ratio following i.p. injection of 1 mg kg−1 reserpine. B, KO mice had a significantly greater relative decrease in LF/HF ratio compared with WT mice. C, both genotypes had a significant decrease in HF power following i.p. injection of 2 mg kg−1 atropine. D, both genotypes had a similar relative decrease in HF power. E, LF/HF ratio was significantly increased in WT mice following stress, but not in KO mice. F, the comparison between genotypes of relative LF/HF change following stress did not reach significance. *P≤ 0.05 by Student’s paired t test, or by Student’s unpaired t test in B. Error bars indicate SEM.

Having validated the effects of reserpine and atropine on HRV of both genotypes, we investigated basal HRV during the night phase, when HR and activity are highest. Fast Fourier transform spectra were produced from a minimum of 10 3 min windows for each mouse as discussed by Thireau et al. (2008; Fig. 4A). The Gnasxl KO mice had an increased LF/HF ratio at night (Fig. 4B; 1.79 ± 0.18 versus 1.23 ± 0.14, KO versus WT, P≤ 0.05, n= 9 and 12), which is consistent with an elevated sympathetic tone as the main cause of their cardiovascular phenotype.

Figure 4. Basic HRV in conscious Gnasxl KO mice .

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Heart rate spectra were produced as in Fig. 3. A, typical HR spectra for WT (Aa) and KO mice (Ab). B, LF/HF ratio was calculated for a minimum of 10 HR spectra for each mouse during the active dark period; mean LF/HF ratio was increased in KO mice. *P≤ 0.05, n= 9 and 12 for KO and WT, respectively. Error bars indicate SEM.

Cardiovascular responses to Ex-4

Given that the GLP-1 neuropeptide system impacts on BP, HR and metabolic rate and that the GLP-1 receptor couples via an α-stimulatory G-protein, we investigated this system using the agonist Ex-4. This agonist elicits identical cardiovascular and brain c-fos responses independent of its route of injection (Barragan et al. 1999; Yamamoto et al. 2002; Hayes et al. 2008; Nogueiras et al. 2009; Baraboi et al. 2011; Griffioen et al. 2011). First, the HR response to 50 μg kg−1 Ex-4 was examined (injected i.p. during the daytime); it resulted in a significant increase in HR in KO mice (Fig. 5A and B; from 542 ± 27 to 622 ± 14 beats min−1 in KO versus from 533 ± 21 to 561 ± 27 beats min−1 in WT; P≤ 0.05 by Student’s paired t test, n= 7). Heart rate variability analysis indicated little effect on LF/HF ratio (sympathetic stimulation) in WT or KO mice (Fig. 5C and D). However, HF power (parasympathetic activity) was decreased significantly by Ex-4 to a similar degree in both genotypes (Fig. 5E and F; WT, −76 ± 4%; and KO, −77 ± 9%, P≤ 0.001; both by Student’s paired t test, n= 7), suggesting that the regulation of parasympathetic tone by the GLP-1 system (Griffioen et al. 2011) is functioning normally in the absence of XLαs. The effects of Ex-4 were very similar to those of the parasympatholytic atropine (Figs 2F and 3C and D). Both drugs caused a similar HRV (HF) response in WT and KO mice, as well as an increase in HR in KOs.

Figure 5. Heart rate and HRV responses to exendin-4 (Ex-4) .

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Treatments and HR recordings were carried out during the light period as in Figs 2 and 3. A, HR response over time in response to i.p. injection of 50 μg kg−1 Ex-4 (arrow). B, HR is significantly increased in KO mice following Ex-4 and trended higher in WT mice. **P≤ 0.01 by Student’s paired t test. C and D, there was no significant difference in LF/HF ratio or relative change in LF/HF ratio following Ex-4 in either genotype. E and F, both genotypes had a decrease in HF power following Ex-4, although this reached significance only in WTs. The relative decrease in HF power was significant to a similar extent. *P≤ 0.05 and ***P≤ 0.001 by Student’s paired t test. Error bars indicate SEM.

Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4

c-fos immunohistochemistry provides a useful histological indicator of neuronal activation patterns in response to various stimuli. In contrast, neuronal inhibition does not result in c-fos induction (Dampney & Horiuchi, 2003). We investigated potential changes in the c-fos response to Ex-4 in Gnasxl KO mice using the same dose as in the HR experiment. Exendin-4 resulted in similar numbers of c-fos-positive neurons in the expected brain regions (PVN, NTS, area postrema and amygdala) in both genotypes (Fig. 6 and Figs S4 and S5). There was also no difference in c-fos counts when a more detailed analysis of PVN subregions along its rostral–caudal axis was undertaken (data not shown). The unchanged c-fos response in sympathetic control regions of XLαs-deficient mice further supports the view that the functions of the GLP-1 system are not impaired in KO mice. We also examined whether the Ex-4-induced c-fos response occurs in XLαs-expressing neurons in WT mice. There was no overlap of expression of the two proteins in the PVN or in the anterior part of the NTS, indicating that XLαs-positive neurons are not activated by Ex-4 (Fig. 7 and Figs S6 and S7).

Figure 6. Neuronal c-fos response to Ex-4 in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) .

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

c-fos immunohistochemistry of coronal brain sections after injection of 50 μg kg−1 i.p. Ex-4. A, representative images showing high levels of c-fos in the PVN of both genotypes. B, no significant c-fos response was observed following saline injection. C, there was no significant difference in numbers of c-fos-positive neurones (per section and left/right brain side) between genotypes. This was also confirmed in a more detailed anterior–posterior PVN subregion-specific assessment (data not shown). Error bars indicate SEM.

Figure 7. c-fos response to Ex-4 in correlation to XLαs expression in the PVN .

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Immunofluorescence for c-fos (green) and XLαs (red) on brain sections of WT mice after Ex-4 i.p. injection. A representative image demonstrates XLαs-expressing neurones located around the periphery of the PVN, while all c-fos positive neurones are found in the centre of the PVN in a noticeably separate cell population. Of five WT mice investigated, co-localization between XLαs and c-fos was <1%.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate, for the first time, that Gnasxl-deficient mice have increased BP, HR and body temperature, which is not associated with increased locomotor activity. To examine the degree of sympathetic stimulation of the cardiovascular system, mice were injected with the sympatholytic reserpine, which inhibits catecholamine uptake into secretory vesicles and thereby release at sympathetic nerve terminals (Iversen et al. 1965). Thus, it selectively diminishes sympathetic stimulation of peripheral tissues. Reserpine caused a greater reduction in BP, HR and LF/HF ratio of HRV in KO compared with WT mice, which concurs with the hypothesis of an increased sympathetic stimulation of the cardiovascular system. In contrast, inhibition of parasympathetic activity with the muscarinic antagonist atropine (Janssen et al. 2000; Laude et al. 2008; Young & Davisson, 2011) or the GLP-1 receptor agonist Ex-4, which was only recently discovered to affect parasympathetic cardiovascular control (Griffioen et al. 2011), caused similar reductions in HF power of HRV in both WT and KO mice. This indicates normal levels of parasympathetic tone in XLαs-deficient mice. The increased HR in KO mice after atropine or Ex-4 injection can be attributed to an underlying elevated basic level of sympathetic activity in mutants compared with WT mice.

For BP experiments, we chose an anaesthetic agent that affects the cardiovascular system less than other substances (Carruba et al. 1987). Furthermore, the anaesthetic was carefully dose matched among WT and KO littermate groups, to equalize any effect. Thermoneutral conditions, as used in our tail-cuff VPR experiment, also tend to lower mean BP (Swoap et al. 2004). Nevertheless, we consistently found BP and the reserpine-mediated reduction in BP to be greater in Gnasxl KO mice. The cardiovascular phenotype was further investigated in conscious, freely moving mice using telemetry for ECG monitoring. Knock-out mice showed an increased HR mainly during the active night period. The reserpine-mediated reduction in HR of KO mice suggests increased sympathetic stimulation of the cardiovascular system. Furthermore, a significant increase in the HR of Gnasxl-deficient mice was observed after application of the muscarinic blocker atropine. These findings led us further to investigate HRV data, which inform on autonomic control of the cardiovascular system and would exclude potential peripheral causes (Young & Davisson, 2011).

Heart rate variability analysis is a method for quantifying autonomic influences on the cardiovascular system based on the inherent rhythms involved in HR variation over time. These occur at characteristic frequencies associated with SNS and PNS influences. Heart rate variability is widely used as a helpful and accurate indicator of autonomic balance (Baudrie et al. 2007; Laude et al. 2008; Thireau et al. 2008) and autonomic responses (Farah et al. 2006; Griffioen et al. 2011). As there are no universal HRV indicators that precisely map to sympathetic activity (Malpas, 2002; Thireau et al. 2008), we defined these empirically by using the classical sympatholytic and parasympatholytic drugs reserpine and atropine, respectively (Iversen et al. 1965; Janssen et al. 2000; Laude et al. 2008; Young & Davisson, 2011). Our empirical validation led us to set our HF band between 1 and 5 Hz. This is in agreement with other analyses (Thireau et al. 2008). We determined that reserpine resulted in loss of virtually all LF power density down to 0.15 Hz. We therefore set our LF range between 0.15 and 1 Hz. In our verifications of drug effects on LF, HF and the LF/HF ratio, atropine decreased LF and HF but had minimal effect on the LF/HF ratio, whilst reserpine decreased LF and the LF/HF ratio, without significant change in HF power. Therefore, the LF/HF ratio appropriately indicates sympathetic tone.

Using these HRV bandings, we found that KO mice had significantly increased LF/HF ratio during the active night period. In KO mice, the LF/HF change after reserpine was significantly more pronounced than in WT mice, suggesting increased sympathetic tone. In contrast, atropine induced a similar HF power response in both genotypes, suggesting no difference in basal PNS activity. The combined HRV and HR data after atropine suppression of the PNS are consistent with elevated basal SNS activity as the prominent cause of the cardiovascular phenotype of Gnasxl KO mice.

Several neuropeptides have been shown to influence the central control of the autonomic nervous system and cardiovascular phenotype (Matsumura et al. 2003; Dupont & Brouwers, 2010; Hall et al. 2010). To begin an analysis of potentially deregulated neuropeptide pathways, which use α-stimulatory G-protein-coupled receptors for signal transduction, we analysed the GLP-1 system. In the CNS, GLP-1 is produced by neurons in the medulla oblongata (Llewellyn-Smith et al. 2011). It increases BP, HR and sympathetic outflow towards metabolically relevant tissues (Barragan et al. 1999; Yamamoto et al. 2002; Hayes et al. 2008; Nogueiras et al. 2009). We detected an exaggerated HR response to Ex-4 in Gnasxl KO mice. Our findings are consistent with a recent report on Ex-4-induced changes in HR and in the HF component of HRV (Griffioen et al. 2011). Together, these studies strongly suggest that Ex-4 increases HR by suppressing cardiac parasympathetic tone. Although Ex-4 reduced the HF component of HRV to the same degree in WT and KO mice, the increase in HR was more pronounced in XLαs-deficient mice, which we attribute to a higher underlying basal sympathetic tone.

In parallel to the suppression of parasympathetic cardiovascular tone, the GLP-1 system also affects the SNS and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (Gil-Lozano et al. 2010). Exendin-4 induces c-fos expression in neurons that project to the sympathetic preganglionic neurons of the spinal cord, as well as in corticotropin-releasing factor-positive neurons of the PVN (Yamamoto et al. 2002; Sarkar et al. 2003). It also stimulates sympathetic nerve activity to white adipose tissue (Nogueiras et al. 2009). A normal c-fos response and an unchanged HRV LF/HF ratio in Gnasxl KO mice indicate that Ex-4 did not directly increase sympathetic stimulation of the heart. It is also interesting to note that XLαs-positive neurons did not show a c-fos response to Ex-4, which concurs with previous findings that XLαs is expressed in a neuron population different from, but in proximity to, sympathetic control neurons at several levels of the CNS (Krechowec et al. 2012).

Glucagon-like peptide-1 is not the only example of a neuropeptide that regulates the PNS and SNS reciprocally. A recent study showed that the melanocortin peptide (α-MSH) system inhibits brainstem parasympathetic preganglionic neurons, but activates sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the spinal cord via its MC4R receptor (Sohn et al. 2013). Stimulation of the melanocortin system results in increased sympathetic tone and hypertension (Hall et al. 2010; Sohn et al. 2013). As the MC4R receptor signals through Gsα, the main protein product of the Gnas locus, there is an interesting antithesis between the two splice variants XLαs and Gsα (Xie et al. 2006; Plagge et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2009; Sohn et al. 2013). Knock-out mice for XLαs and Gsα, respectively, show opposite physiological phenotypes. While XLαs deficiency is associated with leanness and hypermetabolism (Xie et al. 2006), lack of Gsα expression (from the maternal allele, i.e. Gnasm−/p+) in the brain results in obesity and hypometabolism (Chen et al. 2009). This Gsα-mutant phenotype resembles MC4R deficiency (Balthasar et al. 2005). Brain-specific Gnasm−/p+ mice are also hypotensive, with reduced HR and a global decrease in SNS activity (Chen et al. 2009, 2012,). In contrast, we show here that Gnasxl KO mice are hypertensive and tachycardic due to increased sympathetic tone, which also causes elevated energy expenditure (Xie et al. 2006). Whether deficiency of XLαs might lead to an increased activity of the melanocortin–MC4R–Gsα pathway remains to be tested in future studies. It is also noteworthy that XLαs and MC4R show a similar pattern of expression in some subdivisions of the hypothalamic PVN (Kishi et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2003; Krechowec et al. 2012). However, whether coexpression occurs or whether separate neighbouring neuron populations are involved remains to be clarified.

The Gnasxl KO phenotype is also consistent with a permanently activated stress reaction (Grippo et al. 2003; Farah et al. 2006). We found that WT and KO mice had comparable HR increases in response to stress, but the increase in the LF/HF ratio of HRV seen in WT mice was absent in KO mice. This would be consistent with a model whereby the classic reduction in parasympathetic cardiac inhibition by stress (Farah et al. 2006) still occurs, but the sympathetic excitation does not increase further in KO mice due to an already elevated basal cardiovascular sympathetic tone.

In summary, our data indicate that Gnasxl KO mice display a systemic increase in SNS activity, being responsible for the cardiovascular as well as the metabolic phenotype described previously (Xie et al. 2006). Our findings imply that the in vivo role of XLαs involves suppression of SNS outflow. This hypothesis is further supported by the defined expression pattern of XLαs in specific SNS control regions of the hypothalamus and brainstem, including the PVN, dorsomedial nucleus, lateral hypothalamic area, arcuate nucleus, medullary raphe nuclei, NTS and spinal cord (Krechowec et al. 2012). XLαs might, for example, mediate signal transduction from a G-protein-coupled receptor(s) (Liu et al. 2011) in a population of neurons that inhibits neighbouring sympathetic control neurons. The nature of such a receptor currently remains unclear, however. Future experiments will be aimed at characterizing XLαs-expressing neurons and the mechanisms by which this protein inhibits sympathetic activity, including analyses of additional neuroactive substances known to function in XLαs-expressing brain regions, such as α-MSH, angiotensin or substance P (Womack & Barrett-Jolley, 2007; Womack et al. 2007; Nunn et al. 2011).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank staff of the Biomedical Services Unit of the University of Liverpool for expert animal care and support. We would also like to thank Jennifer Kasper for her help with the c-fos analyses.

Additional information

Competing interests

None declared.

Funding

This work was funded by the BBSRC Capacity Building Awards in Integrative Mammalian Biology (BB/E527104/1). A.P. was additionally supported by the MRC UK (ref. G0601256). C.H.F. was funded by a BBSRC strategic skills award to R.B.J.

Supporting Information

Figure S1. Simplified diagram of the Gnaslocus

The maternal and paternal alleles of the locus are indicated.XLαs and the alternatively spliced Gsα are encoded bythe Gnasxl and Gnas transcripts, respectively. Bothproteins have a unique first exon, and share common downstreamexons. XLαs is expressed from the paternal allele (blue);Gsα is expressed biallelically in most tissues, but in certain cell types its expression is limited to the maternal allele (red). The locus has been simplified to show only the two major protein products of the locus, and is not to scale.

Figure S2. Typical ECG and HR traces in consciousGnasxl KO mice and WT siblings

A and B, ECG was recorded in conscious freelymoving adult KO mice B and WT siblings A. (i) Typicalraw ECG traces; (ii) high resolution region of ECG showingannotated heart beats (red bars). (iii) Typical traces of RRintervals and (iv) associated HR traces. (v) High resolution HRtraces showing substantial HRV over time. These bandings were usedfor all the following HRV data analyses. A, (i) Typical HRspectrum from a WT mouse under basal conditions; (ii) typicalspectrum following loss of sympathetic stimulation after reserpineinjection; (iii) typical spectrum following loss of parasympatheticstimulation after atropine injection. B, Both LF power andLF/HF ratio were significantly reduced after reserpine injection,with no significant change to HF power. C, Both LF and HFpowers were significantly reduced after atropine injection, with nosignificant change to LF/HF ratio. *P ≤ 0.05 by pairedt test. Error bars indicate SEM.

Figure S4. Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4 in theamygdala

Gnasxl KO mice and WT siblings were injected with 50μg/kg I.P. Ex-4 and tissues collected two hours later. Brainsections were stained for c-fos by immunohistochemistry. A,Representative images showing c-fos response in the amygdala ofboth genotypes. B, Representative images showing nosignificant c-fos response in the same region following salineinjection. C, There was no significant difference in numbersof c-fos positive neurones (per section and left/right brain side)between genotypes. Error bars indicate SEM.

Figure S5. Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4 in the areapostrema (AP) and medial region of the NTS

Gnasxl KO mice and WT siblings were injected with 50μg/kg I.P. Ex-4 and tissues collected two hours later. Brainsections were stained for c-fos by immunohistochemistry. A,Representative images showing c-fos response in the AP and NTS ofboth genotypes. B, Representative images showing nosignificant c-fos response in the same brain regions followingsaline injection. C, There was no significant difference innumbers of c-fos positive neurones between genotypes. Error barsindicate SEM.

Figure S6. Control immunofluorescence for XLαs andc-fos in response to Ex-4 in the hypothalamic PVN of GnasxlKO

Gnasxl KO mice were injected with 50 μg/kg I.P. Ex-4and tissues collected two hours later. Brain sections wereco-stained for c-fos (green) and XLαs (red). A representativeimage is shown, demonstrating the specificity of the XLαsantibody and a similar c-fos response as in WTs.

Figure S7. c-fos response to Ex-4 in XLαs-expressingneurones of the amygdala

WT and KO mice were injected with 50 μg/kg I.P. Ex-4 andtissues collected two hours later. Brain sections were co-stainedfor c-fos (green) and XLαs (red). A representative image isshown, demonstrating that XLαs-expressing neurones and c-fosresponsive neurones constitute noticeably separate populations. Of5 WT mice investigated, there were no co-localised neuronesfound.

Figure S1. Simplified diagram of the Gnas locus

eph0098-1432-sd1.pdf (122.7KB, pdf)

Figure S2. Typical ECG and HR traces in conscious Gnasxl KO mice andWT siblings

eph0098-1432-sd2.pdf (356.5KB, pdf)

Figure S3. Empirical validation of LF and HF bandings in HRV model.

eph0098-1432-sd3.pdf (222.5KB, pdf)

Figure S4. Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4 in the amygdala.

eph0098-1432-sd4.pdf (346.2KB, pdf)

Figure S5.Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4 in the area postrema (AP) andmedial region of the NTS

eph0098-1432-sd5.pdf (389.8KB, pdf)

Figure S6. Control immunofluorescence for XLαs and c-fos in response to Ex-4 in the hypothalamic PVN of Gnasxl KO

eph0098-1432-sd6.pdf (273.3KB, pdf)

Figure S7. c-fos response to Ex-4 in XLαs-expressing neurones of the amygdala

eph0098-1432-sd7.pdf (344.1KB, pdf)

References

  1. Balthasar N, Dalgaard LT, Lee CE, Yu J, Funahashi H, Williams T, Ferreira M, Tang V, McGovern RA, Kenny CD, Christiansen LM, Edelstein E, Choi B, Boss O, Aschkenasi C, Zhang CY, Mountjoy K, Kishi T, Elmquist JK. Lowell BB. Divergence of melanocortin pathways in the control of food intake and energy expenditure. Cell. 2005;123:493–505. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baraboi ED, St-Pierre DH, Shooner J, Timofeeva E. Richard D. Brain activation following peripheral administration of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;301:R1011–R1024. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00424.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barragan JM, Eng J, Rodriguez R. Blazquez E. Neural contribution to the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1-(7–36) amide on arterial blood pressure in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1999;277:E784–E791. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.277.5.E784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baudrie V, Laude D. Elghozi JL. Optimal frequency ranges for extracting information on cardiovascular autonomic control from the blood pressure and pulse interval spectrograms in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292:R904–R912. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00488.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carruba MO, Bondiolotti G, Picotti GB, Catteruccia N. Da Prada M. Effects of diethyl ether, halothane, ketamine and urethane on sympathetic activity in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987;134:15–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90126-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen M, Berger A, Kablan A, Zhang J, Gavrilova O. Weinstein LS. Gsα deficiency in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus partially contributes to obesity associated with Gsα mutations. Endocrinology. 2012;153:4256–4265. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen M, Wang J, Dickerson KE, Kelleher J, Xie T, Gupta D, Lai EW, Pacak K, Gavrilova O. Weinstein LS. Central nervous system imprinting of the G protein Gsα and its role in metabolic regulation. Cell Metab. 2009;9:548–555. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coote JH. Landmarks in understanding the central nervous control of the cardiovascular system. Exp Physiol. 2007;92:3–18. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.035378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dampney RA. Horiuchi J. Functional organisation of central cardiovascular pathways: studies using c-fos gene expression. Prog Neurobiol. 2003;71:359–384. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davern PJ, Nguyen-Huu TP, La Greca L, Abdelkader A. Head GA. Role of the sympathetic nervous system in Schlager genetically hypertensive mice. Hypertension. 2009;54:852–859. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.136069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dupont AG. Brouwers S. Brain angiotensin peptides regulate sympathetic tone and blood pressure. J Hypertens. 2010;28:1599–1610. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833af3b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Farah VM, Joaquim LF. Morris M. Stress cardiovascular/autonomic interactions in mice. Physiol Behav. 2006;89:569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gil-Lozano M, Pérez-Tilve D, Alvarez-Crespo M, Martís A, Fernandez AM, Catalina PA, Gonzalez-Matias LC. Mallo F. GLP-1(7–36)-amide and exendin-4 stimulate the HPA axis in rodents and humans. Endocrinology. 2010;151:2629–2640. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldberger AL, Amaral LA, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Mark RG, Mietus JE, Moody GB, Peng CK. Stanley HE. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000;101:E215–E220. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffioen KJ, Wan R, Okun E, Wang X, Lovett-Barr MR, Li Y, Mughal MR, Mendelowitz D. Mattson MP. GLP-1 receptor stimulation depresses heart rate variability and inhibits neurotransmission to cardiac vagal neurons. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89:72–78. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grippo AJ, Beltz TG. Johnson AK. Behavioral and cardiovascular changes in the chronic mild stress model of depression. Physiol Behav. 2003;78:703–710. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grobe JL, Grobe CL, Beltz TG, Westphal SG, Morgan DA, Xu D, de Lange WJ, Li H, Sakai K, Thedens DR, Cassis LA, Rahmouni K, Mark AL, Johnson AK. Sigmund CD. The brain renin-angiotensin system controls divergent efferent mechanisms to regulate fluid and energy balance. Cell Metab. 2010;12:431–442. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall JE, da Silva AA, do Carmo JM, Dubinion J, Hamza S, Munusamy S, Smith G. Stec DE. Obesity-induced hypertension: role of sympathetic nervous system, leptin, and melanocortins. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:17271–17276. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.113175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayes MR, Skibicka KP. Grill HJ. Caudal brainstem processing is sufficient for behavioral, sympathetic, and parasympathetic responses driven by peripheral and hindbrain glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor stimulation. Endocrinology. 2008;149:4059–4068. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iversen LL, Glowinski J. Axelrod J. The uptake and storage of H3-norepinephrine in the reserpine-pretreated rat heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1965;150:173–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Janssen BJ, Leenders PJ. Smits JF. Short-term and long-term blood pressure and heart rate variability in the mouse. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000;278:R215–R225. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.278.1.R215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kishi T, Aschkenasi CJ, Lee CE, Mountjoy KG, Saper CB. Elmquist JK. Expression of melanocortin 4 receptor mRNA in the central nervous system of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2003;457:213–235. doi: 10.1002/cne.10454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krechowec SO, Burton KL, Newlaczyl AU, Nunn N, Vlatkovic N. Plagge A. Postnatal changes in the expression pattern of the imprinted signalling protein XLαs underlie the changing phenotype of deficient mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laude D, Baudrie V. Elghozi JL. Effects of atropine on the time and frequency domain estimates of blood pressure and heart rate variability in mice. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:454–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu H, Kishi T, Roseberry AG, Cai X, Lee CE, Montez JM, Friedman JM. Elmquist JK. Transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein under the control of the melanocortin-4 receptor promoter. J Neurosci. 2003;23:7143–7154. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-18-07143.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu Z, Turan S, Wehbi VL, Vilardaga JP. Bastepe M. Extra-long Gαs variant XLαs protein escapes activation-induced subcellular redistribution and is able to provide sustained signaling. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:38558–38569. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.240150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Llewellyn-Smith IJ, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Trapp S. Preproglucagon neurons project widely to autonomic control areas in the mouse brain. Neuroscience. 2011;180:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Malpas SC. Neural influences on cardiovascular variability: possibilities and pitfalls. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;282:H6–H20. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2002.282.1.H6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Malpas SC. Sympathetic nervous system overactivity and its role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:513–557. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00007.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsumura K, Tsuchihashi T, Fujii K. Iida M. Neural regulation of blood pressure by leptin and the related peptides. Regul Pept. 2003;114:79–86. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(03)00116-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Meijer MK, Spruijt BM, van Zutphen LF. Baumans V. Effect of restraint and injection methods on heart rate and body temperature in mice. Lab Anim. 2006;40:382–391. doi: 10.1258/002367706778476370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Niskanen JP, Tarvainen MP, Ranta-Aho PO. Karjalainen PA. Software for advanced HRV analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;76:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nogueiras R, Pérez-Tilve D, Veyrat-Durebex C, Morgan DA, Varela L, Haynes WG, Patterson JT, Disse E, Pfluger PT, López M, Woods SC, DiMarchi R, Diéguez C, Rahmouni K, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F. Tschöp MH. Direct control of peripheral lipid deposition by CNS GLP-1 receptor signaling is mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and blunted in diet-induced obesity. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5916–5925. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5977-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nunn N, Womack M, Dart C. Barrett-Jolley R. Function and pharmacology of spinally-projecting sympathetic pre-autonomic neurones in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2011;9:262–277. doi: 10.2174/157015911795596531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pasolli HA. Huttner WB. Expression of the extra-large G protein α-subunit XLαs in neuroepithelial cells and young neurons during development of the rat nervous system. Neurosci Lett. 2001;301:119–122. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01620-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Plagge A, Gordon E, Dean W, Boiani R, Cinti S, Peters J. Kelsey G. The imprinted signaling protein XLαs is required for postnatal adaptation to feeding. Nat Genet. 2004;36:818–826. doi: 10.1038/ng1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Plagge A, Kelsey G. Germain-Lee EL. Physiological functions of the imprinted Gnas locus and its protein variants Gαs and XLαs in human and mouse. J Endocrinol. 2008;196:193–214. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sarkar S, Fekete C, Legradi G. Lechan RM. Glucagon like peptide-1 (7–36) amide (GLP-1) nerve terminals densely innervate corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Brain Res. 2003;985:163–168. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)03117-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sohn JW, Harris LE, Berglund ED, Liu T, Vong L, Lowell BB, Balthasar N, Williams KW. Elmquist JK. Melanocortin 4 receptors reciprocally regulate sympathetic and parasympathetic preganglionic neurons. Cell. 2013;152:612–619. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sved AF, Cano G. Card JP. Neuroanatomical specificity of the circuits controlling sympathetic outflow to different targets. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2001;28:115–119. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2001.03403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Swoap SJ, Overton JM. Garber G. Effect of ambient temperature on cardiovascular parameters in rats and mice: a comparative approach. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004;287:R391–R396. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00731.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Thireau J, Zhang BL, Poisson D. Babuty D. Heart rate variability in mice: a theoretical and practical guide. Exp Physiol. 2008;93:83–94. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.040733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Womack MD. Barrett-Jolley R. Activation of paraventricular nucleus neurones by the dorsomedial hypothalamus via a tachykinin pathway in rats. Exp Physiol. 2007;92:671–676. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.037457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Womack MD, Morris R, Gent TC. Barrett-Jolley R. Substance P targets sympathetic control neurons in the paraventricular nucleus. Circ Res. 2007;100:1650–1658. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.153494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xie T, Plagge A, Gavrilova O, Pack S, Jou W, Lai EW, Frontera M, Kelsey G. Weinstein LS. The Alternative Stimulatory G protein α-subunit XLαs is a critical regulator of energy and glucose metabolism and sympathetic nerve activity in adult mice. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:18989–18999. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511752200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yamamoto H, Lee CE, Marcus JN, Williams TD, Overton JM, Lopez ME, Hollenberg AN, Baggio L, Saper CB, Drucker DJ. Elmquist JK. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor stimulation increases blood pressure and heart rate and activates autonomic regulatory neurons. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:43–52. doi: 10.1172/JCI15595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Young CN. Davisson RL. In vivo assessment of neurocardiovascular regulation in the mouse: principles, progress, and prospects. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301:H654–H662. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00355.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Simplified diagram of the Gnas locus

eph0098-1432-sd1.pdf (122.7KB, pdf)

Figure S2. Typical ECG and HR traces in conscious Gnasxl KO mice andWT siblings

eph0098-1432-sd2.pdf (356.5KB, pdf)

Figure S3. Empirical validation of LF and HF bandings in HRV model.

eph0098-1432-sd3.pdf (222.5KB, pdf)

Figure S4. Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4 in the amygdala.

eph0098-1432-sd4.pdf (346.2KB, pdf)

Figure S5.Neuronal c-fos responses to Ex-4 in the area postrema (AP) andmedial region of the NTS

eph0098-1432-sd5.pdf (389.8KB, pdf)

Figure S6. Control immunofluorescence for XLαs and c-fos in response to Ex-4 in the hypothalamic PVN of Gnasxl KO

eph0098-1432-sd6.pdf (273.3KB, pdf)

Figure S7. c-fos response to Ex-4 in XLαs-expressing neurones of the amygdala

eph0098-1432-sd7.pdf (344.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Experimental Physiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES