Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2014 Oct 17;18(11):2157–2164. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12468

Human cardiac telocytes: 3D imaging by FIB-SEM tomography

D Cretoiu a,b, E Hummel c, H Zimmermann c, M Gherghiceanu b, L M Popescu a,b,*
PMCID: PMC4224550  PMID: 25327290

Abstract

Telocyte (TC) is a newly identified type of cell in the cardiac interstitium (www.telocytes.com). TCs are described by classical transmission electron microscopy as cells with very thin and long telopodes (Tps; cellular prolongations) having podoms (dilations) and podomers (very thin segments). TCs’ three-dimensional (3D) morphology is still unknown. Cardiac TCs seem to be particularly involved in long and short distance intercellular signalling and, therefore, their 3D architecture is important for understanding their spatial connections. Using focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) we show, for the first time, the whole ultrastructural anatomy of cardiac TCs. 3D reconstruction of cardiac TCs by FIB-SEM tomography confirms that they have long, narrow but flattened (ribbon-like) telopodes, with humps generated by the podoms. FIB-SEM tomography also confirms the network made by TCs in the cardiac interstitium through adherens junctions. This study provides the first FIB-SEM tomography of a human cell type.

Keywords: telocytes, heart, myocardium, FIB-SEM tomography, 3D imaging

Introduction

Telocytes (TCs) are a novel type of interstitial cells described by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in heart 18 and many other organs of vertebrates 918 (see www.telocytes.com).

The shortest definition of TCs is cells with telopodes (Tps). These Tps are extremely long prolongations (several tens to hundreds of micrometers) with podomers (ultrathin segments below the resolving power of light microscopy) and podoms (dilated portions containing mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum). An up-to-date review is available 19.

During the last few years, focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) became the election technique for 3D visualization of biological structures at nanoscale resolution 20,21. FIB-SEM tomography is the most promising approach for 3D imaging at the subcellular level and is considered as a true revolution for ultrastructural volume reconstruction 22. Briefly, FIB-SEM setups offer a series of successive ultrastructural images using concomitantly a focused ion beam for slicing and an electron beam for imaging.

Anyway, FIB-SEM tomography seems the ‘ideal’ available method to disclose the arborescent conformation of TCs (describes on 2D ultrathin sections).

Material and methods

Sample preparation

Small human heart samples (atrial appendages) were obtained from the patients undergoing heart surgery for congenital heart diseases. The small samples of myocardium were processed as previously described 5. Briefly, the 1-mm-cube fragments were fixed by immersion in 4% glutaraldehyde, and post-fixed in 1% OsO4 with 1.5% K4Fe(CN)6 (potassium ferrocyanide – reduced osmium) to increase the membranes contrast. Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated through increasing graded ethanol series and embedded in epoxy resin (Agar 100 from Agar Scientific, Essex, UK) at 60°C for 48 hrs.

FIB/SEM image stack acquisition

Focused ion beam milling and SEM imaging were carried out with a ZEISS Auriga Crossbeam system (from Carl Zeiss Microscopy, München, Germany). FIB milling was performed with 600 pA to 20 nA for the given samples. SEM-Imaging current was 220 pA. To achieve the best signal contrast, the mixed Inlens and energy-selective backscattered detector signals were used. FIB milling steps was 10 nm/slice and each 5th slice was imaged. Accordingly, each image represents 50 nm of the stack, at 9kX magnification. Image pixel size was 10.27 nm.

Stack alignment, segmentation and 3D presentation

Images were first sorted into stacks according to sections alignments for re-alignment. Then, images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA) for re-alignment, noise detection and removal, luminance level adjustment and cropping by regions of interest. Images prepared were then loaded by batches into 3D Slicer 4.3.1 (64 bit; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA) 23 software package (http://www.slicer.org) and reconstructed using Volume Rendering module 24. Parameters of the Volume Rendering module were set according to the luminance level of the structures of interest (cells), leaving the background (intercellular space) transparent. Stacks of images were also loaded in VirtualDub v1.10.4 (Lee A.) software 25 as sequence of numbered JPEG files and converted to video file.

Results and discussion

Previous TEM studies showed that telopodes, cellular prolongations of TC, are very long, predominantly narrow (usually about 100 nm) and accommodate mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum in small dilations named podoms (usually less than 1 μm width). Often the Tps were observed to be discontinuous in 2D images obtained from 60 nm thin serial section by TEM and this suggested a tubular aspect of Tp. Serial sectioning and 3D reconstruction using TEM is not a practical solution to solve the 3D architecture as a result of the dimension of cell (up to 100 μm).

For this reason, FIB-SEM tomography, a technology which allows volume investigation, was carried out with a ZEISS Auriga Crossbeam system on plastic embedded human cardiac tissue. An area surrounding a blood vessel has been selected for investigation, since TCs are preferentially located in the perivascular region. The cardiac tissue investigated had the following dimensions: x – 20.77 μm; y – 21.01 μm; z – 25 μm; area – 436.38 μm2; volume – 10,908.57 μm3. The backscattered electron imaging mode at 50 nm z-interval generated a stack of 500 serial images with 10.27 nm resolution at 9.000 magnification step. The FIB-SEM images showed numerous cells with long and thin prolongations, with typical morphology for TCs, present in the perivascular space of atrial tissue (Figs 1 and 2; Video S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(AD) Four non-consecutive serial images obtained in backscattered electron imaging mode show a telocyte (TC) with two telopodes (Tp1, Tp2). The telopode Tp2 is about 30 μm long and has a waving trajectory. The Tp2 connection with the cell body of the TC is not visible on digital slices (AC). The FIB-SEM tomography (rectangular mark in AD) and 3D reconstruction (arrows in E and F) show the link between apparent disconnected segments of Tp2 in 2D analysis (transmission electron microscopy). Tpx – a telopode which belongs to a different TC, N-nerve ending, CM – cardiomyocyte. Scale bars: 2 μm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(AD) FIB-SEM images (inverted) show 3 telocytes (TC1, TC2, TC3) and a nerve ending (N) in the vicinity of a cardiomyocyte (CM). In 2D digital slices extracted from the volume, the telocyte TC1 show typical narrow segments (podomers, arrowheads) of the telopodes (Tp1, Tp2) alternating with dilations (podom, arrows). The narrow emergence of telopode Tp1 from TC1 is visible in B. The telocyte TC1 is reconstructed in Figure 3. Rectangular marked area is reconstructed in Figure 4. Tpx – telopodes belonging to different telocytes, N-nerve ending, CM – cardiomyocyte, gly- glycogen particles in CM. Scale bars: 2 μm.

FIB-SEM tomography showed that TCs have narrow and flat cellular prolongations (Video S1). 3D reconstruction of a cardiac TC (Fig. 3) showed that Tps have mostly a ribbon-like conformation and that podoms bulge from the podomer plane (Figs 4 and 5). FIB-SEM also confirms previous data showing the presence of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum within podoms 5,15,26,27. The analysis of serial sections showed that TCs are connected each other (Fig. 5) and form a 3D network (Video S1) as reported previously 5,6,28. Moreover, we have found that intercellular connections between TCs usually occur through wide adherens junctions (Fig. 5) most likely to increase the stability of the network. Also, the close vicinity with nerve endings 5,28 was found.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A and B) Automated segmentation of the stack containing the telocyte TC1 from Figure 2 shows that the telopode Tp2 is long (20 μm), narrow (0.2–1 μm) and flat, given a ribbon appearance of the cell. X-Y-Z slice projections from volume could be seen in the right side of A. Scale bars: 2 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A and B) Automated segmentation of the stack containing telopodes (Tp1, Tpx) from rectangle marked in Figure 2 shows how podoms prominence disrupt the flatness of the telopodes. Scale bar: 1 μm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(AF) Six non-consecutive serial images (inverted) obtained in backscattered electron imaging mode at 150 nm z-interval. The quality of the images in FIB-SEM is comparable with classical transmission electron micrograph at 9kX magnification. The red ring indicates a characteristic dilation (podom) of the telopode Tp1, where intracellular structures such as endoplasmic reticulum cisternae and mitochondria are visible. A junction (processus adherens type) could be seen connecting the telopodes Tp1 and Tp2 (arrowheads). The area of this junction (rectangular marked area in E is enlarged in G) is about 5 μm2 (2 μm/2.5 μm). Another emerging junction (recessus adherens type) is visible (arrow in A) between telopodes Tp2 and Tp3 of the adjoining telocyte (TC). Scale bars: AF, 2 μm; G, 1 μm.

Last but not least, this study provides clear evidence that TCs are completely different from fibroblasts, as reported previously, as concerns microRNA imprint 29, gene profile 3032 and proteomics 33. The dynamics of Tps in cell culture is dissimilar for TCs compared to fibroblasts prolongations 34.

In conclusion, the dual-beam FIB-SEM instrumentation, associated with increased computer power and sophisticated display options, appears at present as a quintessential tool for the shift from 2D ultrathin sections to 3D analysis of ultrastructural volumes. Thus, the complex conformation of TCs (Tps, podoms and ribbon-like podomers) and their labyrinthine 3D network is revealed.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number 350/2012 PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0134 [MG, LMP] and partly supported by the Sectorial Operational Programme for Human Resources Development (SOPHRD), financed by the European Social Fund and the Romanian Government under contract number POSDRU 141531 [DC].

Conflicts of interest

Eric Hummel and Hans Zimmermann are EM Specialist - Life Sciences employees of Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, manufacturer of the Auriga Crossbeam FIB-SEM used in this study. All other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Video S1

FIB-SEM of the telocyte TC1 from Fig. 2 and reconstructed in Fig. 3. 150 slice (50nm) sequence of realigned, inverted micrographs with enhanced contrast. Round marks in the movie point out to the connections between the telopodes of telocytes from Fig. 2.

Download video file (46.2MB, avi)

References

  1. Popescu LM, Faussone-Pellegrini MS. TELOCYTES - a case of serendipity: the winding way from Interstitial Cells of Cajal (ICC), via Interstitial Cajal-Like Cells (ICLC) to TELOCYTES. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:729–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01059.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Cardiomyocyte precursors and telocytes in epicardial stem cell niche: electron microscope images. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:871–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01060.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kostin S. Myocardial telocytes: a specific new cellular entity. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:1917–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Popescu LM. The tandem: telocytes—stem cells. Int J Biol Biomed Eng. 2011;5:83–92. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Cardiac telocytes - their junctions and functional implications. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;348:265–79. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1333-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rusu MC, Pop F, Hostiuc S, et al. Telocytes form networks in normal cardiac tissues. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:807–16. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang Y, Sun W, Wu SM, et al. Telocytes in human heart valves. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:759–65. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fertig ET, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Extracellular vesicles release by cardiac telocytes: electron microscopy and electron tomography. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1938–43. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicolescu MI, Popescu LM. Telocytes in the interstitium of human exocrine pancreas: ultrastructural evidence. Pancreas. 2012;41:949–56. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31823fbded. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nicolescu MI, Bucur A, Dinca O, et al. Telocytes in parotid glands. Anat Rec. 2012;295:378–85. doi: 10.1002/ar.21540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Popescu LM. Human myometrium - the ultrastructural 3D network of telocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:2844–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01651.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cretoiu D, Cretoiu SM, Simionescu AA, et al. Telocytes, a distinct type of cell among the stromal cells present in the lamina propria of jejunum. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:1067–78. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ceafalan L, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM, et al. Telocytes in human skin–are they involved in skin regeneration? J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:1405–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01580.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Popescu BO, Gherghiceanu M, Kostin S, et al. Telocytes in meninges and choroid plexus. Neurosci Lett. 2012;516:265–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luesma MJ, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Telocytes and stem cells in limbus and uvea of mouse eye. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1016–24. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiao J, Wang F, Liu Z, et al. Telocytes in liver: electron microscopic and immunofluorescent evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1537–42. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cretoiu SM, Cretoiu D, Marin A, et al. Telocytes: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and electrophysiological characteristics in human myometrium. Reproduction. 2013;145:357–70. doi: 10.1530/REP-12-0369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cretoiu SM, Radu BM, Banciu A, et al. Isolated human uterine telocytes: immunocytochemistry and electrophysiology of T-type calcium channels. Histochem Cell Biol. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s00418-014-1268-0. Doi: 10.1007/s00418-014-1268-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cretoiu SM, Popescu LM. Telocytes revisited. Biomol Concepts. 2014 doi: 10.1515/bmc-2014-0029. Doi: 10.1515/bmc-2014-0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schmidt F, Kühbacher M, Gross U, et al. From 2D slices to 3D volumes: image based reconstruction and morphological characterization of hippocampal cells on charged and uncharged surfaces using FIB/SEM serial sectioning. Ultramicroscopy. 2011;111:259–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kizilyaprak C, Bittermann AG, Daraspe J, et al. FIB-SEM tomography in biology. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1117:541–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-776-1_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Merchán-Pérez A, Rodriguez JR, Alonso-Nanclares L, et al. Counting synapses using FIB/SEM microscopy: a true revolution for ultrastructural volume reconstruction. Front Neuroanat. 2009;3:18. doi: 10.3389/neuro.05.018.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1323–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Volume Rendering Module, 3D Slicer 4.3 Documentation. http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Documentation/4.3/Modules/VolumeRendering. Last accessed Oct 5, 2014.
  25. VirtualDub v1.10.4. Working with image sequences. http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=34. Last accessed: Oct 5, 2014.
  26. Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Heterocellular communication in the heart: electron tomography of telocyte-myocyte junctions. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:1005–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01299.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Popescu LM, Gherghiceanu M, Suciu LC, et al. Telocytes and putative stem cells in the lungs: electron microscopy, electron tomography and laser scanning microscopy. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;345:391–403. doi: 10.1007/s00441-011-1229-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gherghiceanu M, Manole CG, Popescu LM. Telocytes in endocardium: electron microscope evidence. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:2330–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cismasiu VB, Radu E, Popescu LM. miR-193 expression differentiates telocytes from other stromal cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:1071–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01325.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zheng Y, Zhang M, Qian M, et al. Genetic comparison of mouse lung telocytes with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:567–77. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun X, Zheng M, Zhang M, et al. Differences in the expression of chromosome 1 genes between lung telocytes and other cells: mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, alveolar type II cells, airway epithelial cells and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:801–10. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zheng M, Sun X, Zhang M, et al. Variations of chromosomes 2 and 3 gene expression profiles among pulmonary telocytes, pneumocytes, airway cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and lymphocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:2044–60. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zheng Y, Cretoiu D, Yan G, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of human lung telocytes with fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:568–89. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Niculite CM, Regalia TM, Gherghiceanu M, et al. Dynamics of telopodes (telocyte prolongations) in cell culture depends on extracellular matrix protein. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2215-z. Doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2215-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video S1

FIB-SEM of the telocyte TC1 from Fig. 2 and reconstructed in Fig. 3. 150 slice (50nm) sequence of realigned, inverted micrographs with enhanced contrast. Round marks in the movie point out to the connections between the telopodes of telocytes from Fig. 2.

Download video file (46.2MB, avi)

Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES