Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1972 Aug;6(2):178–183. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.2.178-183.1972

Growth of Streptococcus faecium in the Presence of Lysozyme

Robert H Metcalf a,1, R H Deibel a
PMCID: PMC422512  PMID: 4631915

Abstract

Streptococcus faecium can grow normally in the presence of lysozyme, despite the observation that cell suspensions of the organism are lysed readily by the enzyme. Growth in the presence of lysozyme is not due to resistant cells, and the culture is lysed after growth if the pH of the medium is not allowed to drop too low for lysozyme activity. Growth followed by lysis in the presence of lysozyme was not exhibited by other organisms tested which were either significantly more resistant or more sensitive to lysozyme than S. faecium. Lysozyme was active on the cell wall of S. faecium during growth in the presence of 200 μg of the enzyme per ml in a complex medium. It appears that, when actively metabolizing, S. faecium can synthesize the cell wall at a greater rate than lysozyme can hydrolyze it. Thus, the organism is capable of growth in the presence of the enzyme. A large variation in the lytic responses of enterococcal cell suspensions to lysozyme was dependent on the strain used, the growth phase from which the culture was harvested, and the medium in which the culture was grown.

Full text

PDF
178

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HOLDEN J. T., VANBALGOOY J. N. EFFECT OF NUTRITIONAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS ON THE REACTION BETWEEN LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM AND MURAMIDASE. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1965 May 3;19:401–406. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(65)90136-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LITWACK G., PRAMER D. Growth of Micrococcus lysodeikticus as substrate for lysozyme. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956 Feb;91(2):290–294. doi: 10.3181/00379727-91-22241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Metcalf R. H., Deibel R. H. Differential lytic response of enterococci associated with addition order of lysozyme and anions. J Bacteriol. 1969 Sep;99(3):674–680. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.3.674-680.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Osserman E. F. Crystallization of human lysozyme. Science. 1967 Mar 24;155(3769):1536–1537. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3769.1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SHUGAR D. The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1952 Mar;8(3):302–309. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(52)90045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. TOENNIES G., ISZARD L., ROGERS N. B., SHOCKMAN G. D. Cell multiplication studied with an electronic particle counter. J Bacteriol. 1961 Dec;82:857–866. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.6.857-866.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yudkin M. D. Isolation and analysis of the protoplast membrane of Bacillus megaterium. Biochem J. 1966 Mar;98(3):923–928. doi: 10.1042/bj0980923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES