Abstract
Data from massively parallel sequencing or “Next Generation Sequencing” of the human exome has reached a critical mass in both public and private databases, in that these collections now allow researchers to critically evaluate population genetics in a manner that was not feasible a decade ago. The ability to determine pathogenic allele frequencies by evaluation of the full coding sequences and not merely a single SNP or series of SNPs will lead to more accurate estimations of incidence. For demonstrative purposes we analyzed the causative gene for the disorder Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS), the 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7) gene and determined both the carrier frequency for DHCR7 mutations, and predicted an expected incidence of the disorder. Estimations of the incidence of SLOS have ranged widely from 1:10,000 to 1:70,000 while the carrier frequency has been reported as high as 1 in 30. Using four exome data sets with a total of 17,836 chromosomes, we ascertained a carrier frequency of pathogenic DHRC7 mutations of 1.01%, and predict a SLOS disease incidence of 1/39,215 conceptions. This approach highlights yet another valuable aspect of the exome sequencing databases, to inform clinical and health policy decisions related to genetic counseling, prenatal testing and newborn screening.
Introduction
Mutations in the 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase gene (DHCR7) cause the autosomal recessive disorder, Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS), a multiple malformation/cognitive impairment syndrome. Perturbations of DHCR7 function result in the accumulation of 7-dehydrocholesterol (7DHC) and reduction in cholesterol levels. This alteration of sterol composition results in a plethora of congenital malformations accompanied by various degrees of cognitive and behavioral impairments. The incidence of SLOS has been reported between 1:10,000 to 1:70,000 depending on the population being studied (1), while the carrier frequency has been reported as high as 1 in 30 (2). Efforts to determine the allelic frequency of mutations has been limited to a few common mutations but are inadequate for predicting overall carrier frequencies or predicting the rate of SLOS pregnancies given the large number of pathogenic mutations found in DHCR7. To date 164 mutations have been reported (3-8). Although SLOS has been thought of predominantly as a disorder of Northern European decent (9), there have been reported cases in nearly all ethnicities. Even within Europe there are frequency differences and gradients for individual mutations. For example, the most common mutant allele, c.964-1G>C, likely originated in the British Isles but has a decreasing prevalence moving eastward across Northern Europe (9). c.964-1G>C accounts for approximately one third of all mutant alleles reported, with a reported carrier frequency of approximately 1% in North American populations (1). Reported estimations of the clinical incidence of SLOS may be erroneous due to lack of ascertainment at both ends of the clinical spectrum. Many severely affected patients are likely lost in utero (10), while mildly affected patients with minimal malformations may fail to prompt biochemical testing and are therefore potentially missed. Due to this potentially biased ascertainment, it is difficult to discern both the full prevalence of the disorder or the allelic frequency. In this report we sought to determine the full allelic frequency of SLOS utilizing exome sequencing.
Materials and Methods
Generation of the variant call data presented in this report used the following analysis. Variant calls from the V3 release of the 1000 Genomes Project (11) were pulled for regions overlapping a defined gene, in this case DHCR7, by Perl script. Each individual call of the 1092 samples was evaluated for each allele (2184 calls) at every base of the coding exons or occurring within 5 base pairs of an exon. This was done for all the data sets, with the exception of the ClinSeq® data that was evaluated within 2 base pairs of an exon. Variant calls were tabulated by defined ethnicity of the sample, allowing for mutation frequencies to be calculated for both the overall set and for individual ethnic groups at each mutant position. Mutations were annotated using SNPnexus (12) using Refseq (13) annotations and Polyphen-2 severity of effect predictions (14), variations detected within 5 bases of intron exon boundaries were analyzed by MaxEntScan (15) Annotated synonymous and UTR mutations were dropped prior to calculating an overall mutation rate for the gene. Separately, data was compiled from ClinSeq® (16), NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) (17), and a NIH inter-institute collaboration on autism for the gene of interest using a similar scripted pipeline.
Classification of the variant as pathogenic or nonpathogenic was accomplished by comparing the variants found in the data sets against all published mutations in literature as well as performing a gene search of the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®) (8). For variants that had not been previously associated with SLOS, we classified those determined by Polyphen-2 as “Probably Damaging”, or “Possibly Damaging” as pathogenic. The splice variant, c.99(-4)G>A, was tested by isolation of mRNA from a heterozygous cell line. Reverse transcription PCR using SuperScript III® (Life Technologies) and Sanger sequencing were performed.
ESP contributed a maximum allele number of 12,988, 1000 genome contributed 2,184 alleles, ClinSeq® contributed 1,902 alleles and the NIH inter-institute collaboration on Autism project contributed 762 alleles. This totaled to a maximum of 17,836 alleles that we analyzed. None of these datasets included any patients ascertained for the presence of SLOS, so we considered them to be unbiased with respect to variation in the DHCR7 gene.
Results
Comparison of the human reference sequence to exome sequencing data available from the four databases revealed 515 nonsynonymous sequence variants, in DHCR7 from 17,836 chromosomes, indicating an overall incidence of variation of 2.89% (515 variant alleles/17,836 total alleles). Further analysis of the 515 variants found 74 distinct changes; 71 coding single nucleotide base variants, 2 splice mutations, and 1 insertion. The majority of these changes were unique in the data set (43 of the 74 variants), whereas 9 variants were noted 10 or more times and accounted for 408 of the total 515 variants detected (79%) (Table 1). In order to determine the rate of pathogenic alleles we conducted a literature search and queried HGMD® and found 25 of 74 distinct variants published in individuals diagnosed with SLOS. This included 23 coding single nucleotide base variants and 2 splice mutations. We further performed in silico analysis on all the coding single nucleotide base variants using Polyphen-2, which provided a predictive assignment of “benign”, “possibly damaging”, or “probably damaging”. Of the 23 coding single nucleotide base variants identified previously in SLOS, Polyphen-2 classified 18 as probably damaging, 4 as possibly damaging, and 1 as benign. Of the remaining 48 coding single nucleotide base variants Polyphen-2 predicted 17 as probably damaging, 7 as possibly damaging, and 24 as benign. For this study we classified variants that have not been previously associated with SLOS as pathogenic if they had Polyphen-2 prediction of “Probably Damaging”, or “Possibly Damaging”.
Table 1.
cDNA | Protein | rs# | Polyphen/Published/MaxEntScan | Total Alleles | Total Variants | 1000 Genome | ESP | Clinseq | Autism | Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.3G>A | p.M1I | rs121909767 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.14C>T | p.S5L | rs1127869 | BENIGN | 17836 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.25A>T | p.I9F | rs115595829 | BENIGN | 17502 | 171 | 13 | 153 | 3 | 2 | 0.98% |
c.28C>G | p.P10A | rs139166382 | BENIGN | 17836 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.02% |
c.70G>T | p.A24S | rs146867923 | BENIGN | 17736 | 43 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 2 | 0.24% |
c.77A>C | p.Q26P | rs199815542 | BENIGN | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.89G>C | p.G30A | rs200334114 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.91C>T | p.R31C | rs367585401 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.92G>A | p.R31H | rs370307688 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.99-4G>A | intronic | rs140748737 | Neutral/Published | 15834 | 27 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.17% |
c.127G>A | p.V43I | rs200984695 | BENIGN | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.131T>C | p.I44T | rs142897396 | BENIGN | 17836 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.03% |
c.165C>G | p.Y55X | rs374941029 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.199G>A | p.A67T | rs143999854 | BENIGN | 17746 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.07% |
c.208G>A | p.G70S | rs144512551 | BENIGN | 17772 | 22 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0.12% |
c.221A>C | p.D74A | rs374874199 | BENIGN | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.223A>T | p.I75F | rs370748173 | BENIGN | 17836 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.226G>A | p.V76I | BENIGN | 17502 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01% | |
c.232G>A | p.G78R | rs373352413 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.265A>T | p.T89S | rs375997113 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.278C>T | p.T93M | rs80338853 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.289G>A | p.A97T | rs150563256 | BENIGN | 17836 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.03% |
c.292C>T | p.Q98X | rs104886039 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17822 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.321G>C | p.Q107H | rs104886040 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.376G>A | p.V126I | rs143587828 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.385A>G | p.I129V | rs138215017 | BENIGN | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.400G>T | p.V134L | rs201466849 | BENIGN/Published | 17308 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.02% |
c.418G>A | p.V140M | rs373908315 | BENIGN | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.452G>A | p.W151X | rs11555217 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17422 | 15 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0.09% |
c.461C>G | p.T154R | rs143312232 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17494 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.06% |
c.506C>T | p.S169L | rs80338855 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.509C>G | p.P170R | rs150459687 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.523G>A | p.D175N | rs368269558 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.583G>A | p.A195T | rs151170252 | BENIGN | 17836 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.02% |
c.603C>A | p.F201L | rs377727130 | BENIGN | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.658A>C | p.M220L | rs200659923 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.670G>A | p.E224K | rs373121544 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.683G>A | p.R228Q | rs201556114 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.719A>G | p.N240S | rs148609143 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.03% |
c.724C>T | p.R242C | rs80338856 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.822C>A | p.N274K | rs139787408 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.849_856insCTTCT | 17824 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% | |||
c.852C>A | p.F284L | rs184297154 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.883A>G | p.I295V | rs201574502 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.907G>A | p.G303R | rs142808899 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.02% |
c.928G>A | p.D310N | rs370955781 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.964-1G>C | intronic | rs138659167 | Negative/Published | 16736 | 94 | 10 | 70 | 9 | 5 | 0.56% |
c.988G>A | p.V330M | rs139724817 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING/Published | 17812 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0.04% |
c.1004C>G | p.P335R | rs77762671 | BENIGN | 17836 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1012G>A | p.V338M | rs72954276 | BENIGN | 17568 | 14 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0.08% |
c.1018G>A | p.V340I | rs148081697 | BENIGN | 17830 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1025T>C | p.L342P | rs199957106 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1084C>T | p.R362C | rs371302153 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17832 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1085G>A | p.R362H | rs142213147 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1088G>A | p.R363H | rs200539324 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1138T>C | p.C380R | rs373306653 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1156G>A | p.D386N | rs369837196 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1204G>A | p.V402M | rs200099137 | BENIGN | 17822 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1210C>T | p.R404C | rs61757582 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17574 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1228G>C | p.G410R | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17502 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01% | |
c.1231G>A | p.D411N | rs372055524 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17828 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1270G>T | p.G424C | rs368150818 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17810 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1270G>A | p.G424S | BENIGN | 17442 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% | |
c.1290C>G | p.Y430X | rs140791666 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17828 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1300A>G | p.I434V | rs375187933 | BENIGN | 17832 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1336C>T | p.R446W | rs145043679 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17834 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1342G>A | p.E448K | rs80338864 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17572 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1354G>A | p.A452T | rs140400648 | BENIGN | 17836 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1366G>A | p.G456S | rs201847193 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1369C>T | p.R457W | rs371873032 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17832 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1381C>T | p.R461C | rs199506852 | POSSIBLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1384T>C | p.Y462H | rs201270451 | PROBABLY DAMAGING/Published | 17630 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1405C>T | p.R469C | rs148660993 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17818 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
c.1406G>A | p.R469H | rs201150384 | PROBABLY DAMAGING | 17836 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01% |
The 2 splice variants identified in this study were c.964-1G>C and c.99-4G>A. The c.964-1G>C mutation is the most common mutation found in SLOS patients and has previously been shown to have a carrier frequency of approximately 1% (2). Restricting analysis of 1000 Genome Project data to 988 alleles from Northern European populations (CEU, CLM, FIN, GBR, IBS, TSI, PUR) we found an incidence of 0.81% consistent with published results (Table 2). The second splice variant, c.99-4G>A, presented with a combined frequency of 0.17%. Although this variant has recently been published as a causative mutation in SLOS (3), the relatively high carrier frequency combined with only being reported once led us to hypothesize that it is non-pathogenic. In silico analysis with MaxEntScan predicted this change to be neutral. To verify the nonpathological nature of this variant, mRNA from a cell line heterozygous for this polymorphism, was reverse transcribed and sequenced. No evidence of alternative splicing was detected and sequencing identified two distinct normal alleles (data not shown). We conclude that this variant is benign. In addition, we identified one 5-nucleotide insertion, c.849_856CTTCT, that predicts a frameshift, p.F284S*10, and early termination that we consider pathogenic.
Table 2.
1000 Genome | NE populations* | ESP | ClinSeq | Autism | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.964-1G>C variant | 10 | 8 | 70 | 9 | 5 |
Total alleles analyzed | 2184 | 988 | 12864 | 926 | 762 |
Rate | 0.46% | 0.81% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 0.66% |
The 1000 Genome project defined the populations analyzed and therefore if only Northern European populations were taken into consideration (CEU, CLM, FIN, GBR, IBS, TSI, PUR, Supplemental Table 1), a carrier rate of 0.81% was found. This variation of the ethnic diversity emphasizes the importance of considering the population studied.
Combining published pathogenic alleles, with the alleles identified by Polyphen-2 as possibly damaging, probably damaging, and the one likely pathogenic insertion resulted in a total of 191 pathogenic alleles. Thus, these data predict a carrier frequency for pathogenic DHRC7 mutations of 1.07%. Polyphen-2 provided a false discovery rate (FDR) for each of the 71 coding single nucleotide base variants. The average FDR was 12% for all 3 categories, where as the average FDR of the combined probably damaging, or possibly damaging was 5%. Taking into account the FDR of the probably damaging, or possibly damaging variants we are left with 181 pathogenic alleles, and a carrier frequency for pathogenic DHRC7 mutations of 1.01% (181 variant alleles/17,836 total alleles). Based on these carrier frequencies we are able to predict a SLOS disease incidence of1/34,937 to 1/39,215 conceptions, respectively. This estimate is in good concordance, especially when one takes into account in utero demise, with the estimated incidence of 1/40,000 reported by Lowry and Yong, and Nowaczyk et al. (18, 19) and an incidence of 1/50,000 based on the biochemical diagnosis of approximately 40 cases of SLOS per year in the US between 1995 and 1998 (20).
Discussion
While this data set is extremely powerful, it is not without limitations. We detected the most common mutation reported in SLOS, c.964-1G>C, as well as many of the other common mutations. However, of the 164 known mutations we only detected 25, or 15.2% of the known pathogenic alleles in SLOS. A number of factors could influence both the accuracy of our allelic prediction and the number of variants detected. First and foremost are the quality of the sequencing and the depth of coverage. Exome capture is still not perfect and routinely fails to capture the whole exome, as noted in our supplemental tables we did not have sequence at every variant detected for all 17,836 chromosomes. Numerous alignment and calling algorithms exist that can impact the number of variants called per sample. The depth of coverage is important to consider as the 1000 genomes project is sequencing to an average depth of 4×. As such the project predicts they will only detect a minor variant allele that occurs at a frequency of 1%. Many exome sequencing projects, including the 3 other data sets presented here, are sequencing to a greater depth of coverage, which should permit increased detection of rare variants. Second, is our interpretation of these data. We utilized the in silico predictions of Polyphen to predict deleterious mutations, while in good agreement with the published pathogenic alleles there was one variant, c.400G>T, p. V134L that Polyphen predicted as benign, but has been reported as deleterious in an SLOS patient (3). However, no functional analysis has been performed on this mutation, and it is possible that it is a benign variant. Conversely it is possible that the overall incidence maybe slightly higher due to our exclusion of coding single nucleotide base variants deemed by polyphen-2 to be “Benign” if subsequent studies find them to be causative.
Greater ethnicity data in association with the exome data sets will enhance the ability to accurately assess frequencies of rare variants within any population. This was most evident in our study of the common c.964-1G>C mutation in these data sets. When we were able to directly identify individuals of northern European decent we found a rate similar to published literature. The lack of ethnicity data by no means diminishes the power of these data sets; the inclusion of ethnicity would simply increase the versatility of the data to perform greater population genetic analysis. As the cost of exome sequencing continues to decrease these data sets are likely to continue growing, becoming even more powerful resources.
This study predicts the carrier frequency of DHCR7 mutations based on 17,836 DHCR7 alleles. This approach has general utility for rare diseases in that an accurate estimate of carrier frequency can be used for prediction of disease incidence, allow determination of more accurate genetic risk assessments, and guide public health decisions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
JLC, JI, CS, AT, SS, BBW, LGB, FDP, and CAW are all funded by the NIH intramural research program, DHHS. ET is funded by Autism Speaks.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: LGB is an uncompensated advisor to the Illumina Corporation and receives royalties from the Genentech Corporation; all other authors report no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Porter FD, Herman GE. Malformation syndromes caused by disorders of cholesterol synthesis. J Lipid Res. 2011;52(1):6–34. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R009548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Battaile KP, Battaile BC, Merkens LS, Maslen CL, Steiner RD. Carrier frequency of the common mutation IVS8-1G>C in DHCR7 and estimate of the expected incidence of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Molecular genetics and metabolism. 2001;72(1):67–71. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2000.3103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Waterham HR, Hennekam RC. Mutational spectrum of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2012;160C(4):263–84. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Balogh I, Koczok K, Szabo GP, et al. Mutational spectrum of smith-lemli-opitz syndrome patients in hungary. Mol Syndromol. 2012;3(5):215–22. doi: 10.1159/000343923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ellingson MS, Wick MJ, White WM, et al. Pregnancy in an individual with mild Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Clin Genet. 2013 doi: 10.1111/cge.12209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sparks SE, Wassif CA, Goodwin H, et al. Decreased cerebral spinal fluid neurotransmitter levels in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s10545-013-9672-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Olah AV, Szabo GP, Varga J, et al. Relation between biomarkers and clinical severity in patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172(5):623–30. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1925-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, et al. The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Genome Med. 2009;1(1):13. doi: 10.1186/gm13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Witsch-Baumgartner M, Ciara E, Loffler J, et al. Frequency gradients of DHCR7 mutations in patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome in Europe: evidence for different origins of common mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(1):45–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Putnam AR, Szakacs JG, Opitz JM, Byrne JL. Prenatal death in Smith-Lemli-Opitz/RSH syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;138(1):61–5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491(7422):56–65. doi: 10.1038/nature11632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chelala C, Khan A, Lemoine NR. SNPnexus: a web database for functional annotation of newly discovered and public domain single nucleotide polymorphisms. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(5):655–61. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haas D, Garbade SF, Vohwinkel C, et al. Effects of cholesterol and simvastatin treatment in patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007;30(3):375–87. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0537-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yeo G, Burge CB. Maximum entropy modeling of short sequence motifs with applications to RNA splicing signals. J Comput Biol. 2004;11(2-3):377–94. doi: 10.1089/1066527041410418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Biesecker LG, Mullikin JC, Facio FM, et al. The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1665–74. doi: 10.1101/gr.092841.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. [cited 2014 January];Exome Variant Server NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Available from: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/
- 18.Lowry RB, Yong SL. Borderline normal intelligence in the Smith-Lemli-Opitz (RSH) syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1980;5(2):137–43. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320050205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nowaczyk MJ, Waye JS, Douketis JD. DHCR7 mutation carrier rates and prevalence of the RSH/Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: where are the patients? American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2006;140(19):2057–62. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kelley RI, Hennekam RC. The Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. J Med Genet. 2000;37(5):321–35. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.5.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.