Skip to main content
Journal of the International AIDS Society logoLink to Journal of the International AIDS Society
. 2014 Nov 2;17(4Suppl 3):19764. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19764

Potential drug–drug interactions in HIV-perinatally infected adolescents on antiretroviral therapy in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Ezequiel Cordova 1, Diego Cecchini 1, Claudia Rodriguez 1
PMCID: PMC4225378  PMID: 25397508

Abstract

Introduction

An increasing number of treatment-experienced perinatally HIV-infected adolescents (PHA) are being transitioned from paediatric centres to adult HIV-care [1]. Most of them had been heavily exposed to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), harbour drug-resistant viruses and require non-antiretroviral medication due to comorbidities [2]. This may predispose for clinically significant drug–drug interactions (CSDDIs) [3]. There are no studies concerning CSDDIs in PHA. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of concomitant medications and CSDDIs in PHA who were transitioned for adult HIV-care to the Infectious Diseases Unit, Cosme Argerich Hospital, Buenos Aires City, Argentina.

Materials and Methods

Descriptive pilot cross-sectional study (March to June 2014). PHA under ARVs at the time of the study were assessed for concomitant medication. CSDDIs were screened and categorized using the University of Liverpool Drug Interactions Program (www.hiv-druginteractions.org) [4].

Results

Forty-five patients were included. Female sex: 53%. Median (IQR) age: 20 years (18–22). CDC-stage C was observed in 27 (79%); 50% had ≥1 comorbidities including 3 with HCV co-infection. Drug abuse was observed in 6 (13%). The median of prior ARV regimens was 3 (3–5). Current ARV regimen included: PI: 87%, NNRTI: 27%, INSTI: 20%, enfuvirtide: 7% and CCR5 inhibitor: 4%. Median CD4 T-cell count: 568 cells/mL (279–771). Viral load <50 copies/mL: 80%. Sixty percent (27/45) had ≥1 co-medications (median 1). The most frequent co-medications were NSAIDs (40%), hormonal therapy (19%) and antimicrobials (19%). Use of herbal supplements was observed in 10 (22%). Overall, 23 (51%) had ≥ 1 CSDDIs: 19/27 (70%) with co-medication (orange flag=18 and red flag=1); and 2/10 (20%) with herbal supplements. ARV–ARV interactions were observed in 4/45 (9%): unboosted atazanavir+tenofovir (n=2), unboosted atazanavir+efavirenz (n=1) and lopinavir/ritonavir+efavirenz (n=1) (all orange flag). Considering patients with CSDDIs, 6 (26%) had a CSDDI that could reduce ARV levels.

Conclusions

In this pilot study, a high prevalence of comorbidities, co-medications and CSDDIs was observed in PHA. A considerable proportion of patients had CSDDIs with a potential to cause sub-therapeutic ARV levels, what could be a concern in patients harbouring drug-resistance viruses. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of comorbid conditions pharmacologic management in order to avoid CSDDIs with ARVs agents.

References

  • 1.Sohn AH, Hazra R. The changing epidemiology of the global paediatric HIV epidemic: keeping track of perinatally HIV-infected adolescents. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16:18555. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.18555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van der Linden D, Lapointe N, Kakkar F, Ransy DG, Motorina A, Maurice F, et al. The young and the resistant: HIV-infected adolescents at the time of transfer to adult care. J Ped Infect Dis. 2012 doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis106. First published online: December 19, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miller D, El-Kholi R, Faragon JJ, Lodise TP. Prevalence and risk factors for clinically significant drug interactions with antiretroviral therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:1379–86. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.10.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions website [Internet] [cited 2004 Jul 3]. Available from: http://www.hiv-druginteractions.org. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the International AIDS Society are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES