Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1972 Sep;6(3):364–369. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.3.364-369.1972

Protective Action of 2,2-Bis(Parachlorophenyl)-1,1,1-Trichloroethane Against Intoxication of Cells by Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B

Janis Gabliks 1
PMCID: PMC422542  PMID: 4637611

Abstract

Chlorinated hydrocarbon 2,2-bis(parachlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (DDT) and its derivative 2,2-bis(parachlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethane (o,p′-DDD) protected the cells of human embryonic intestine, Henle strain, against the cytotoxic effects induced by staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB). The hydrocarbons were incorporated in the culture medium, and the cytotoxicity of SEB was measured by cell destruction and by inhibition of cell growth during incubation for 48 hr. When DDT at nontoxic levels (4 to 25 μg/ml) was added to cultures, 24 or 4 hr prior to or 7 hr after the administration of toxin (100 μg/ml), the cells did not show the characteristic cytotoxicity. A therapeutic effect was also observed with o,p′-DDD added to cultures 9 hr after SEB. Because the cells treated with DDT for a period of 24 hr remained resistant to the toxin when DDT was removed from the cultures, it appears that DDT acts upon the cells rather then upon enterotoxin B. The protective effect of DDT was also observed against the toxin-induced skin erythemas and necrosis in guinea pigs treated with DDT.

Full text

PDF
364

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Craig C. P., Normann S. J., McGann V., Irvin W. S. Chemotactic activity generated by staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Infect Immun. 1971 Jan;3(1):94–99. doi: 10.1128/iai.3.1.94-99.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crawley G. J., Black J. N., Gray I., Blanchard J. W. Clinical chemistry of staphylococcal enterotoxin poisoning in monkeys. Appl Microbiol. 1966 May;14(3):445–450. doi: 10.1128/am.14.3.445-450.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crawley G. J., Gray I., Leblang W. A., Blanchard J. W. Blood binding, distribution and excretion of staphylococcal enterotoxin in monkeys. J Infect Dis. 1966 Feb;116(1):48–56. doi: 10.1093/infdis/116.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. EAGLE H. Amino acid metabolism in mammalian cell cultures. Science. 1959 Aug 21;130(3373):432–437. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3373.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elsberry D. D., Rhoda D. A., Beisel W. R. Hemodynamics of staphylococcal B enterotoxemia and other types of shock in monkeys. J Appl Physiol. 1969 Aug;27(2):164–169. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1969.27.2.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finegold M. J. Interstitial pulmonary edema. An electron microscopic study of the pathology of staphylococcal enterotoxemia in Rhesus monkeys. Lab Invest. 1967 Jun;16(6):912–924. doi: 10.21236/ad0811615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang I. Y., Bergdoll M. S. The primary structure of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. 3. The cyanogen bromide peptides of reduced and aminoethylated enterotoxin B, and the complete amino acid sequence. J Biol Chem. 1970 Jul 25;245(14):3518–3525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keller R., Mueller-Eckhardt C., Kayser F. H., Keller H. U. Interrelations between different typs of cells. I. A comparative study of the biological properties of a cationic polypeptide from lysosomes of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and other cationic compounds. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1968;33(3):239–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kent T. H., Jervis H. R., Kuhns J. G. Enzyme histochemistry of acute staphylococcal enterotoxin gastroenteritis in rhesus monkeys. Am J Pathol. 1966 Apr;48(4):667–681. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schaeffer W. I., Gabliks J., Calitis R. Interaction of staphylococcal enterotoxin B with cell cultures of human embryonic intestine. J Bacteriol. 1966 Jan;91(1):21–26. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.1.21-26.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schaeffer W. I., Gabliks J., Calitis R. Interference by trypsin in the interaction of staphylococcal enterotoxin B and cell cultures of human embryonic intestine. J Bacteriol. 1967 May;93(5):1489–1492. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.5.1489-1492.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schaeffer W. I. Interaction of staphylococcal enterotoxin B with cell cultures I. Effect of serum and testing procedures. Infect Immun. 1970 May;1(5):455–458. doi: 10.1128/iai.1.5.455-458.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schantz E. J., Roessler W. G., Wagman J., Spero L., Dunnery D. A., Bergdoll M. S. Purification of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Biochemistry. 1965 Jun;4(6):1011–1016. doi: 10.1021/bi00882a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stiles J. W., Denniston J. C. Response of the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta, to continuously infused staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Lab Invest. 1971 Dec;25(6):617–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES