Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Oncology
. 2014 Oct 20;32(33):3744–3752. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5730

Trastuzumab Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: Planned Joint Analysis of Overall Survival From NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831

Edith A Perez 1,, Edward H Romond 1, Vera J Suman 1, Jong-Hyeon Jeong 1, George Sledge 1, Charles E Geyer Jr 1, Silvana Martino 1, Priya Rastogi 1, Julie Gralow 1, Sandra M Swain 1, Eric P Winer 1, Gerardo Colon-Otero 1, Nancy E Davidson 1, Eleftherios Mamounas 1, Jo Anne Zujewski 1, Norman Wolmark 1
PMCID: PMC4226805  PMID: 25332249

Abstract

Purpose

Positive interim analysis findings from four large adjuvant trials evaluating trastuzumab in patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive breast cancer were first reported in 2005. One of these reports, the joint analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG N9831 (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project NSABP B-31 (Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2), was updated in 2011. We now report the planned definitive overall survival (OS) results from this joint analysis along with updates on the disease-free survival (DFS) end point.

Methods

In all, 4,046 patients with HER2-positive operable breast cancer were enrolled to receive doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in both trials. The required number of events for the definitive statistical analysis for OS (710 events) was reached in September 2012. Updated analyses of overall DFS and related subgroups were also performed.

Results

Median time on study was 8.4 years. Adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy led to a 37% relative improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.73; P < .001) and an increase in 10-year OS rate from 75.2% to 84%. These results were accompanied by an improvement in DFS of 40% (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.68; P < .001) and increase in 10-year DFS rate from 62.2% to 73.7%. All patient subgroups benefited from addition of this targeted anti-HER2 agent.

Conclusion

The addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer results in a substantial and durable improvement in survival as a result of a sustained marked reduction in cancer recurrence.

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 15% to 20% of invasive breast cancers have amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene or overexpression of the HER2 protein.1 Before the availability of HER2-directed therapies, women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer faced a worse prognosis than those with a diagnosis of HER2-negative disease, with shorter time to disease relapse, an increased incidence of metastases, and higher mortality.1

Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein, was found to improve survival in the metastatic disease setting when used in combination with chemotherapy.2 As a result, it was then tested in the adjuvant setting in two North American trials: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG N9831 trial (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project NSABP B-31 trial (Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2).

The NCCTG N9831 (hereafter N9831) and NSABP B-31 (hereafter B-31) trials assessed the efficacy and safety of adding trastuzumab to paclitaxel followed by trastuzumab alone after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide → trastuzumab plus paclitaxel → trastuzumab). The trials were similar in design, allowing the National Cancer Institute and the US Food and Drug Administration to approve a joint efficacy analysis plan that could be executed before the first planned efficacy interim analysis of the individual trials. At the first planned joint interim analysis, the stopping boundary was crossed and the data were released. With a median follow-up of just 2 years, there was a 52% reduction in disease-free survival (DFS) events (P < .001) with a trend toward improvement in overall survival (OS; P = .015) with the addition of trastuzumab.3 A second analysis, when the median follow-up was 3.9 years, found a continued reduction in DFS events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.60) with the addition of trastuzumab and a continued trend toward improvement in OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.75).4

The joint analysis plan called for definitive analysis of survival data after 710 deaths and is the primary subject of this report. The additional follow-up also provides an opportunity to further characterize recurrence patterns in both groups of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study Design

This study combines data from the B-31 and N9831 clinical trials (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute) that were designed independently to assess the impact of adding trastuzumab to paclitaxel followed by trastuzumab alone after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with operable primary node-positive or high-risk node-negative HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (Appendix Fig A1, online only). The experimental arm for this joint analysis consisted of the patients randomly assigned to N9831 arm C and B-31 arm 2 who received four 3-week cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 12 weeks of paclitaxel given once per week (both N9831 and B-31) or once every 3 weeks (B-31 only) concurrently with trastuzumab once per week followed by trastuzumab alone to complete a year of targeted therapy. The control arm consisted of the patients randomly assigned to N9831 arm A and B-31 arm 1: doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 12 weeks of paclitaxel given once per week (N9831 and B-31) or once every 3 weeks (B-31 only).

Patient Trial Eligibility

Women age 18 years or older with primary, operable, and histologically confirmed node-positive (both trials) or high-risk node-negative invasive (N9831 only) breast cancer with no evidence of distant metastases were eligible. After initial quality control testing of tumors from the first approximately 100 patients in each trial, tumors had to be strongly HER2-positive (either HER2 gene amplified by fluorescent in situ hybridization or 3+ by immunohistochemistry) and confirmed by an approved reference laboratory (B-31) or central or reference laboratory (N9831).

Additional requirements included adequate hematopoietic, hepatic, and renal function and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to the local institution's lower limit of normal. Contraindications to study entry included angina pectoris or arrhythmia requiring medications, severe conduction abnormality, significant valvular heart disease, cardiomegaly on chest radiography, left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography (B-31), poorly controlled hypertension, clinically significant pericardial effusion (N9831), or a history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF), or cardiomyopathy. Participating institutions obtained approval from their institutional review boards and filed assurances with the Department of Health and Human Services. Written informed consent was required for enrollment.

Contraindications to Initiation of Trastuzumab

Initiation of trastuzumab in the experimental group was not allowed in patients who developed symptoms related to left ventricular dysfunction, cardiac ischemia, or arrhythmia while receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or in patients whose LVEF measurement after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide had decreased by more than 15 percentage points from baseline or pretreatment value or had decreased ≤ 15 percentage points from baseline but to a level below the lower limit of normal. In all, 102 patients (5%) randomly assigned to the trastuzumab group did not receive trastuzumab. Nevertheless, these patients are included in the experimental group in this intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis.

Impact of the Release of the First Joint Analysis on Patient Treatment Course

After the release of the first interim joint analysis results in 2005, patients who had been randomly assigned to N9831 arm A were allowed to receive trastuzumab if they had an acceptable LVEF level and at most 6 months had elapsed since completion of paclitaxel. Patients randomly assigned to B-31 arm 1 were allowed to receive trastuzumab if they were currently receiving study treatment or had completed study treatment but had registered onto B-31 after April 25, 2004, and had an acceptable LVEF level. As a result, 413 patients in the control group (20%) received trastuzumab. These patients, nevertheless, are evaluated with their initial assigned treatment group in this ITT analysis.

Statistical Analysis

This joint analysis included all patients enrolled onto B-31 and patients on N9831 from arms A and C except the 152 patients enrolled onto arm A from January 24, 2002 to September 2, 2002 when enrollment to arm C was temporarily suspended because of safety concerns and the 193 patients who were found not to have HER2-positive disease by central confirmatory testing. All remaining patients were included in the analysis according to their assigned treatment arm.

This joint analysis was conducted to assess whether OS (defined as the time from enrollment to death as a result of any cause) differed with respect to treatment. Causes of death were provided by the enrolling institution (N9831) and, if they were available, physicians' notes summarizing death, death certificates, or autopsy reports were to be submitted (B-31). As part of cardiac safety monitoring (done before progression in N9831 and until death in B-31), a cardiac event or sudden death reporting protocol was developed to capture deaths as a result of CHF, myocardial infarction, primary arrhythmia, and sudden deaths without documented etiology. Documentation of the event, including cardiology consult notes and imaging (multiple-gated acquisition scan, echocardiography, computed tomography, and chest x-ray) reports, was to be submitted.

If the circumstances surrounding a patient's death were not available, the cause of death was classified as unknown, even if the patient had developed recurrent breast cancer or a second malignancy.

The other efficacy end point examined was DFS, defined as the time from enrollment to documentation of the first of any of these events: local, regional, or distant recurrence of breast cancer; a contralateral breast cancer; a second primary cancer; or death as a result of any cause. Patients alive without a disease event were censored at the time of their last disease evaluation (ie, patients randomly assigned to the non-trastuzumab–containing regimens who chose to receive trastuzumab after the release of the first joint analysis of N9831 and B-31 were not censored when they began trastuzumab). Acceptable criteria for documenting a disease event by treating physician were positive cytology aspirate or biopsy for local or regional recurrence; positive cytology aspirate, biopsy, or imaging studies for distant recurrence; and histologic confirmation for a new primary cancer.

The overall distributions of DFS and OS were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.5 Proportional hazards modeling was used to assess whether DFS or OS differed with respect to treatment, taking into account the stratification factors: study (B-31 v N9831), intended paclitaxel schedule (once every 3 weeks v once per week), number of positive nodes (zero to three v four to nine v ≥ 10 nodes), and hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER] –positive and/or progesterone receptor [PgR] –positive v ER-negative and PgR-negative) as well as other patient and disease characteristics.3,4

RESULTS

Study Population

The study cohort consisted of 2,102 women enrolled onto B-31 and 1,944 women enrolled onto arm A or arm C of N9831 (Fig 1). Pretreatment characteristics of these 4,046 women are listed in Table 1 and are balanced not only across treatment arms but also across protocols.

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

CONSORT diagram. DOX + CYC: doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks × 4; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PAC80: paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week × 12; PAC175: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks × 4; TRAS: trastuzumab initial loading dose 4 mg/kg, then 2 mg/kg once per week × 52.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics by Treatment Arm

Characteristic Control Group
Trastuzumab Group
NSABP B-31 (n = 1,047)
NCCTG N9831 (n = 971)
NSABP B-31 (n = 1,055)
NCCTG N9831 (n = 973)
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Age at random assignment, years
    18-39 170 16.2 163 16.8 172 16.3 149 15.3
    40-49 352 33.6 324 33.4 367 34.7 330 33.9
    50-59 355 33.9 328 33.8 343 32.5 310 31.9
    ≥ 60 170 16.2 156 16.1 173 16.4 184 18.9
Extent of surgery
    Breast conserving 412 39.4 383 39.4 412 39.1 370 38.0
    Mastectomy 634 60.6 588 60.6 643 60.9 603 62.0
    Unknown 1 0.1 0 0 0
ER/PgR status
    ER-negative and PgR-negative 464 44.2 447 46.0 468 44.4 449 46.2
    ER-positive or PgR-positive 581 55.5 524 54.0 586 55.6 524 54.8
    Unknown 2 0.2 0 1 0.1 0
Tumor size, cm
    ≤ 2.0 431 41.2 392 40.4 405 38.4 370 38.0
    2.1-5.0 532 50.8 509 52.4 534 50.6 521 53.6
    ≥ 5.1 80 7.6 70 7.2 113 10.7 82 8.4
    Unknown 4 0.4 0 3 0.3 0
Tumor grade
    1 29 2.8 10 1.0 23 2.2 14 1.4
    2 316 30.2 256 26.4 292 27.7 259 26.6
    3 693 66.2 694 71.5 730 69.2 684 70.3
    Unknown 9 0.9 11 1.1 10 1.0 16 1.6
No. of histologically positive lymph nodes
    0 0 149 15.4 0 133 13.7
    1-3 600 57.3 457 47.1 611 57.9 476 48.9
    4-9 306 29.2 236 24.3 302 28.6 240 24.7
    ≥ 10 141 13.5 129 13.3 142 13.5 124 12.7
Intended paclitaxel schedule
    Once per week 168 16.0 971 100 170 16.1 973 100
    Once every 3 weeks 879 84.0 0 885 83.9 0
Adjuvant radiation therapy
    Yes 801 76.5 637 65.6 811 76.9 660 67.8
    No 246 23.5 334 34.4 244 23.1 313 32.2
Adjuvant hormonal therapy
    Yes 586 56.0 498 51.3 591 56.0 498 51.2
    No 461 44.0 446 45.9 464 44.0 458 47.1
    Unknown 0 27 2.8 0 17 1.8

Abbreviations: ER, estrogen receptor; NCCTG N9831, North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG N9831 trial (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Breast Cancer); NSABP B-31, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project NSABP B-31 trial (Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2); PgR, progesterone receptor.

The data were locked on September 15, 2012. The median length of follow-up among those still alive was 8.4 years for the trastuzumab-containing arm and 8.3 years for the control arm, with 4% in the trastuzumab-containing arm and 8.2% in the control arm followed for less than 5 years (Fig 1).

Among the 2,028 women randomly assigned to a trastuzumab-containing arm, 1,555 (76.7%) were alive without evidence of disease; 187 (9.2%) were alive following a disease recurrence, a second primary cancer, and/or contralateral breast cancer; 210 (10.4%) died as a result of breast cancer; 32 (1.6%) died as a result of other causes; nine (0.4%) died from cardiac conditions, and 35 (1.7%) died as a result of unknown causes (Table 2).

Table 2.

Clinical Outcomes by Treatment Arm

Clinical Outcome Control Group (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, then paclitaxel) (n = 2,018) Trastuzumab Group (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, then paclitaxel and trastuzumab) (n = 2,028)
First documented disease event 680 473
    Locoregional recurrence 119 82
    Distant recurrence 387 228
    Local and distant recurrence 29 13
    Contralateral breast cancer 40 46
    Other second primary cancer 74 66
    Death without progressive disease, second primary, or contralateral breast disease 31 38
All deaths 418 286
    Breast cancer 341 210
    Second primary cancer
        Solid tumor 15 15
        Hematologic malignancy* 7 2
    Cardiac conditions
        Congestive heart failure 2 3
        Cardiac arrest 1 3
        Cardiomyopathy 0 1
        Myocardial infarction 0 1
        Unspecified cardiac condition 0 1
    Sepsis/septicemia 8 1
    Other causes 21 14
    Unknown cause 23 35
*

One case of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Fourteen of these 23 patients had a prior breast recurrence or second primary cancer disease.

Sixteen of these 35 patients had a prior breast recurrence or second primary cancer disease.

Among the 2,018 women on the control arm, 1,338 (66.3%) were alive without evidence of disease; 262 (13.0%) were alive with disease recurrence, a second primary cancer, and/or contralateral breast disease; 341 (16.9%) had died as a result of breast cancer; 51 (2.5%) were dead as a result of other causes; three (0.1%) died from cardiac conditions and 23 (1.1%) were dead as a result of unknown causes (Table 2).

OS

Women randomly assigned to the trastuzumab-containing arm had a significantly increased OS relative to those randomly assigned to the control arm when the stratification factors are taken into account (stratified HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.73; P < .001) as well as when the stratification factors plus age, tumor size, and extent of surgery are taken into account (adjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.71; P < .001; Table 3 and Fig 2A). Table 4 depicts the HR (trastuzumab-containing regimen relative to nonstras-tuzumab-containing regimen) for OS by subsets. Statistically significant benefit was seen with the addition of trastuzumab to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel across all subgroups of patients. Of note, the HRs for patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors and those with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive tumors were similar at 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.76), respectively (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3.

Multivariable Proportional Hazards Modeling Results

Factor OS
DFS
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Hormone receptor status
    ER-positive and/or PgR-positive 0.74 0.64 to 0.86 < .001 0.74 0.66 to 0.84 < .001
    ER-negative and PgR-negative 1 1
No. of positive nodes
    ≥ 10 2.86 2.36 to 3.46 < .001 2.53 2.18 to 2.94 < .001
    4-9 1.71 1.44 to 2.04 < .001 1.41 1.23 to 1.62 < .001
    0-3 1 1
Paclitaxel schedule
    Once every 3 weeks 1.36 0.99 to 1.86 .0613 1.36 1.07 to 1.73 .0116
    Once per week 1 1
Masked trial designation
    A 1.08 0.78 to 1.49 .644 1.09 0.86 to 1.39 .4842
    B 1 1
Age, years
    ≥ 60 1.52 1.28 to 1.81 < .001 1.20 1.04 to 1.39 .0134
    18-59 1 1
Tumor size, cm
    > 5 1.73 1.33 to 2.24 < .001 1.81 1.47 to 2.23 < .001
    2-5 1.57 1.32 to 1.86 < .001 1.53 1.34 to 1.74 < .001
    < 2 1 1
Extent of surgery
    Mastectomy 1.25 1.05 to 1.47 .0099 1.03 0.91 to 1.16 .6844
    Breast conserving 1 1
Regimen
    Trastuzumab-containing 0.61 0.52 to 0.71 < .001 0.58 0.52 to 0.66 < .001
    Control 1 1

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; ER, estrogen receptor; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PgR, progesterone receptor.

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

(A) Overall survival and (B) disease-free survival from combined data analysis for North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG N9831 (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer) and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project NSABP B-31 (Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2). AC, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; H, trastuzumab; HR, hazard ratio; T, paclitaxel.

Table 4.

Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Then Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Then Paclitaxel: Hazard of Death and Hazard of Disease Event Within Subgroups

Factor No. of Patients OS
DFS
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Age, years
    < 40 654 0.67 0.46 to 0.99 0.50 0.37 to 0.67
    40-49 1,373 0.65 0.49 to 0.86 0.64 0.51 to 0.78
    50-59 1,336 0.68 0.52 to 0.90 0.64 0.52 to 0.79
    ≥ 60 683 0.51 0.37 to 0.69 0.63 0.49 to 0.82
Hormone receptor status
    ER-negative and PgR-negative 1,828 0.65 0.53 to 0.80 0.62 0.52 to 0.73
    ER-positive or PgR-positive 2,215 0.61 0.49 to 0.76 0.61 0.51 to 0.72
Tumor size, cm
    0.1-2 1,598 0.51 0.38 to 0.69 0.55 0.44 to 0.68
    2.1-5.0 2,096 0.68 0.56 to 0.82 0.65 0.56 to 0.76
    ≥ 5.1 345 0.58 0.39 to 0.88 0.47 0.33 to 0.67

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; ER, estrogen receptor; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PgR, progesterone receptor.

DFS

The types of first-disease events for each treatment group are listed in Table 2. Distant recurrence was detected alone or in combination with other-disease events in 416 patients (20.6%) in the control arm and 241 (11.9%) in the trastuzumab arm. There was brain involvement in the first-disease events among 40 patients (2.0%) in the control arm and 63 patients (3.1%) in the trastuzumab arm. Contralateral breast cancers as a first event were uncommon in this study, occurring in 2% of patients.

Women randomly assigned to the trastuzumab-containing arm had a significantly improved DFS relative to those randomly assigned to the control arm when the stratification factors are taken into account (stratified HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.68; P < .001; Fig 2B) as well as when the stratification factors plus age, extent of surgery, and tumor size are taken into account (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.66; P < .001; Table 3). Table 4 shows DFS by subgroups, indicating that all subsets derive similar and significant benefit from the addition of trastuzumab. Of note, the HRs for patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors and those with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive tumors were similar at 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72), respectively. The impact of hormone receptor status and nodal status on patient outcome are described in Table 5.

Table 5.

10-Year OS and DFS Rates

Factor 10-Year OS
10-Year DFS
Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Then Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab
Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Then Paclitaxel
Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Then Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab
Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Then Paclitaxel
% 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI
No. of positive nodes
    0-3 89.0 86.9 to 91.2 83.1 80.6 to 85.6 77.5 74.7 to 80.4 70.4 67.4 to 73.5
    4-9 79.2 75.4 to 83.1 70.4 65.9 to 75.2 71.0 66.9 to 75.4 56.4 51.8 to 61.3
    ≥ 10 71.7 65.9 to 78.2 52.6 46.0 to 60.1 62.4 56.2 to 69.2 38.4 32.7 to 45.2
ER and PgR status
    ER-negative and PgR-negative 81.6 78.7 to 84.6 73.0 69.8 to 76.4 70.9 67.5 to 74.5 58.6 55.0 to 62.4
    ER-positive or PgR-positive 86.0 83.6 to 88.4 77.1 74.0 to 80.2 76.1 73.2 to 79.1 65.1 62.0 to 68.5

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; ER, estrogen receptor; OS, overall survival; PgR, progesterone receptor.

DISCUSSION

Long-term follow-up, at a median of 8.4 years from study enrollment, demonstrates that the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab administered after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy first in combination with paclitaxel for 12 weeks and then alone for 40 weeks is associated with a statistically significant and substantial improvement in OS with a risk reduction of 37% (HR, 0.63) and continued substantial improvement in DFS with risk reduction in disease events of 40% (HR, 0.60). Improvements in OS and DFS were observed in all subgroups of patients with resected HER2-positive breast cancer (ie, small or large tumors, hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative, low or high number of involved axillary nodes, and younger or older patients).

In this ITT analysis of B-31 and N9831, a marked degree of benefit was demonstrated despite the fact that 5% of the patients randomly assigned to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab were prohibited from receiving trastuzumab because of cardiac issues during or following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and 20% of those assigned to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel received trastuzumab after the first interim analysis and reported remarkable early benefit.

Cardiac dysfunction is a recognized risk associated with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy. Extensive measures were implemented in each trial to capture instances of CHF, cardiac death, and sudden death of unknown etiology. When the joint analysis plan was drawn up in 2005, it did not include a provision to jointly examine cardiac safety. However, the difference in the cumulative incidence of these cardiac events between trastuzumab and non-trastuzumab–containing regimens after starting paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab was reported to be 3.0% at 3 years in N9831 and 2.7% at 7 years in B-31.6,7 In this analysis, the 8-year cumulative incidence rate of deaths after random assignment known to be a result of cardiac causes was 0.2% for patients with the trastuzumab-containing regimen and 0.1% for patients in the control arm. With less than 20% of the patients enrolled onto these trials having died, this difference in incidence of known cardiac-related deaths does not appear to diminish the favorable risk-benefit profile of this trastuzumab-containing regimen.

There have been several adjuvant breast cancer trials that have reported substantial improvements in DFS with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy but with some cardiac complications in terms of decreases in LVEF during treatment and CHF. In the Herceptin Adjuvant trial (HERA: A Randomised Three-Arm Multi-Centre Comparison of 1 Year and 2 Years of Herceptin Versus No Herceptin in Women With HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer Who Have Completed Adjuvant Chemotherapy), patients were randomly assigned to observation or to 1 year of trastuzumab after completion of definitive surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation, whichever came last.8 However, the release of the initial joint B31-N9831 analysis findings in 2005 as well as the initial results of the HERA trial itself had a significant impact on the observation arm of the HERA trial, with half these patients receiving trastuzumab. Despite this crossover, after a median of 8 years of follow-up, there was a substantial improvement in DFS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.86) and OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88) with the addition of 1 year of trastuzumab (these HRs were slightly higher than those observed with our concurrent regimen reported herein).

The BCIRG 006 (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer) trial found a significant improvement in DFS over that with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel when 1 year of trastuzumab was combined with an anthracycline-based regimen (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, then docetaxel plus trastuzumab, then trastuzumab alone; HR, 0.64) as well as with non-anthracycline–containing regimen (docetaxel and carboplatin, then trastuzumab; HR, 0.75).9 This trial was not designed to assess whether the cumulative risk of DFS differed between the two trastuzumab-containing regimens.

In addition, several trials have been conducted to address the optimal duration of trastuzumab. The HERA trial did not find a significant difference in DFS or OS between 1 and 2 years of trastuzumab after surgery or chemotherapy with or without radiation.8 The PHARE trial (Protocol of Herceptin Adjuvant With Reduced Exposure, a Randomised Comparison of 6 Months vs 12 Months in All Women Receiving Adjuvant Herceptin [PHARE]) randomly assigned 3,384 women with HER2-positive breast cancer who completed surgery and chemotherapy with or without radiation and received up to 6 months of trastuzumab to a total of either 6 or 12 months of trastuzumab. After 3.5 years of follow-up, the PHARE trial failed to show that 6 months of trastuzumab was noninferior to 12 months of trastuzumab.10

There have been differences related to the timing of the initiation of trastuzumab relative to the chemotherapy regimens used. HERA administered trastuzumab after the completion of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation whichever came last. N9831, B-31, and the BCIRG 006 trials administered trastuzumab with a taxane after chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. N9831 was the only clinical trial that was designed to compare starting trastuzumab concurrent with a taxane to after completion of a taxane. With a median follow-up of 6 years, there was a trend toward improved DFS when trastuzumab was administered concurrently with paclitaxel (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab) relative to treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, then paclitaxel, then trastuzumab (ie, trastuzumab was not administered concurrently with paclitaxel).11 The number of disease events in both the sequential and concurrent trastuzumab arms was much lower than hypothesized when the study was designed.

On the basis of the aggregate DFS data, 1 year of trastuzumab initiated concurrently with a taxane is considered the standard of care. This joint analysis of the B-31 and N9831 trials extends our previous findings of substantial improvements in DFS with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab, followed by trastuzumab alone, over doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel to include a substantial improvement in OS for women with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Supplementary Material

Protocol
Author Interview by ASCO

Acknowledgment

Presented in part at the 35th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, December 4-8, 2012.

Glossary Terms

cumulative risk:

a measure of risk of an event (usually disease occurrence) during a specified time period.

estrogen receptor (ER):

ligand-activated nuclear proteins, belonging to the class of nuclear receptors, present in many breast cancer cells that are important in the progression of hormone-dependent cancers. After binding, the receptor-ligand complex activates gene transcription. There are two types of estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ). ERα is one of the most important proteins controlling breast cancer function. ERβ is present in much lower levels in breast cancer, and its function is uncertain. Estrogen receptor status guides therapeutic decisions in breast cancer.

fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH):

in situ hydridization is a sensitive method generally used to detect specific gene sequences in tissue sections or cell preparations by hybridizing the complementary strand of a nucleotide probe to the sequence of interest. FISH uses a fluorescent probe to increase the sensitivity of in situ hybridization.

monoclonal antibody:

an antibody that is secreted from a single clone of an antibody-forming cell. Large quantities of monoclonal antibodies are produced from hybridomas, which are produced by fusing single antibody-forming cells to tumor cells. The process is initiated with initial immunization against a particular antigen, stimulating the production of antibodies targeted to different epitopes of the antigen. Antibody-forming cells are subsequently isolated from the spleen. By fusing each antibody-forming cell to tumor cells, hybridomas can each be generated with a different specificity and targeted against a different epitope of the antigen.

overall survival:

the duration between random assignment and death.

progesterone receptor (PgR):

nuclear proteins that are activated by the hormone progesterone in breast cancer cells that are hormone-dependent. See estrogen receptor (ER).

trastuzumab:

a humanized anti-ErbB2 monoclonal antibody approved for treating patients whose breast cancers overexpress the ErbB2 protein or demonstrate ErbB2 gene amplification. It is currently being tested in combination with other therapies.

Appendix

Fig A1.

Fig A1.

Protocol schemas. AC, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; H, trastuzumab; HT, hormonal therapy; NCCTG N9831, North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG N9831 (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer); NSABP B-31, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project NSABP B-31 (Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2); RT, radiation therapy; T, paclitaxel.

Listen to the podcast by Dr Burstein at www.jco.org/podcasts

Support information appears at the end of this article.

Clinical trial information: NCT00005970, NCT00004067.

Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Support

Supported by Grants No. U10-CA25224 and CA129949 from the National Institutes of Health; Grants No. U10-CA12027, U10-CA69651, U10-CA37377, and U10-CA69974 from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project; by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation; and by Grant No. 35-03 from Genentech. P.A.K. received research funding from Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following author(s) and/or an author's immediate family member(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked with a “U” are those for which no compensation was received; those relationships marked with a “C” were compensated. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

Employment or Leadership Position: None Consultant or Advisory Role: Charles E. Geyer Jr, Genentech (C); Sandra M. Swain, Genetech/Roche (U); Eric P. Winer, Genentech (U); Eleftherios Mamounas, Genentech (C); Norman Wolmark, Genentech/Roche (U) Stock Ownership: None Honoraria: Edward H. Romond, Genentech; George Sledge, Genentech; Eleftherios Mamounas, Genentech Research Funding: Edward H. Romond, Genentech/Roche; George Sledge, Genentech; Julie Gralow, Roche, Genentech, Amgen, Novartis; Sandra M. Swain, Genentech/Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, sanofi-aventis, Pfizer; Eric P. Winer, Genentech

Expert Testimony: None Patents, Royalties, and Licenses: None Other Remuneration: Sandra M. Swain, Genentech/Roche

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Edith A. Perez, Edward H. Romond, Vera J. Suman, Silvana Martino, Sandra M. Swain, Nancy E. Davidson, Jo Anne Zujewski, Norman Wolmark

Administrative support: Edith A. Perez, Silvana Martino, Norman Wolmark

Provision of study materials or patients: Edith A. Perez, Edward H. Romond, George Sledge, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Silvana Martino, Priya Rastogi, Eric P. Winer, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Nancy E. Davidson, Eleftherios Mamounas, Norman Wolmark

Collection and assembly of data: Edith A. Perez, Edward H. Romond, Vera J. Suman, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, George Sledge, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Silvana Martino, Priya Rastogi, Julie Gralow, Eric P. Winer, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Eleftherios Mamounas, Jo Anne Zujewski, Norman Wolmark

Data analysis and interpretation: Edith A. Perez, Edward H. Romond, Vera J. Suman, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, George Sledge, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Priya Rastogi, Julie Gralow, Sandra M. Swain, Eric P. Winer, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Nancy E. Davidson, Eleftherios Mamounas, Jo Anne Zujewski, Norman Wolmark

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

REFERENCES

  • 1.Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244:707–712. doi: 10.1126/science.2470152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1673–1684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, et al. Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3366–3373. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons; 1995. Analysing Survival Data From Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, et al. Cardiac safety analysis of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 adjuvant breast cancer trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1231–1238. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Romond EH, Jeong JH, Rastogi P, et al. Seven-year follow-up assessment of cardiac function in NSABP B-31, a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP) with ACP plus trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3792–3799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.0010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): An open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1021–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1273–1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pivot X, Romieu G, Debled M, et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHARE): A randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:741–748. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70225-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, et al. Sequential versus concurrent trastuzumab in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4491–4497. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Protocol
Author Interview by ASCO

Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES