Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1973 Jun;7(6):847–854. doi: 10.1128/iai.7.6.847-854.1973

Production of Staphylococcal Enterotoxins A, B, and C Under Conditions of Controlled pH and Aeration

Audrey W Jarvis 1,2, R C Lawrence 1,2, G G Pritchard 1,2
PMCID: PMC422773  PMID: 4716543

Abstract

The production of enterotoxins A, B, and C by nine strains of Staphylococcus aureus has been studied under controlled conditions in a fermenter. The strain to strain differences between staphylococci producing a specific enterotoxin were very marked. Increasing aeration in shake flasks improved both growth and production of all extracellular proteins measured other than that of enterotoxin C, the yield of which was decreased in one strain at high aeration. Silicone antifoam decreased the production of extracellular proteins, although enterotoxin A production from three strains was much less affected than that of enterotoxins B and C. In a detailed study of three strains, production of enterotoxins A and C was considerably greater in a defined amino acid medium than in a casein hydrolysate medium and was optimal for all three enterotoxins between pH 6.5 and 7.3. Changes in the pH or medium used in the fermenter that led to increased enterotoxin production could generally be correlated with a change in growth pattern, showing an extended transition period from exponential to stationary phase. Three out of five enterotoxin-A producing strains produced significantly more enterotoxin at a controlled pH of 6.5 in the fermenter than in shake-flask cultures. The yields with strain 100 were about five times greater than hitherto reported. Since many foods are buffered at pH 6 to 6.5, some strains may, therefore, produce sufficient enterotoxin A to cause food poisoning, although little or none may be produced when grown under normal testing procedures.

Full text

PDF
847

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arvidson S., Holme T. Influence of pH on the formation of extracellular proteins by Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;79(3):406–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1971.tb00080.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dietrich G. G., Watson R. J., Silverman G. J. Effect of shaking speed on the secretion of enterotoxin B by Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Oct;24(4):561–566. doi: 10.1128/am.24.4.561-566.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Genigeorgis C., Foda M. S., Mantis A., Sadler W. W. Effect of sodium chloride and pH on enterotoxin C production. Appl Microbiol. 1971 May;21(5):862–866. doi: 10.1128/am.21.5.862-866.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Genigeorgis C., Sadler W. W. Effect of sodium chloride and pH on enterotoxin B production. J Bacteriol. 1966 Nov;92(5):1383–1387. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.5.1383-1387.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HALLANDER H. O. PRODUCTION OF LARGE QUANTITIES OF ENTEROTOXIN B AND OTHER STAPHYLOCOCCAL TOXINS ON SOLID MEDIA. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;63:299–305. doi: 10.1111/apm.1965.63.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jarvis A. W., Lawrence R. C. A micro-method for the quantitative determination of deoxyribonuclease. Can J Biochem. 1969 Jun;47(6):673–675. doi: 10.1139/o69-103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jarvis A. W., Lawrence R. C. Production of extracellular enzymes and enterotoxins A, B, and C by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1971 Aug;4(2):110–115. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.2.110-115.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Markus Z. H., Silverman G. J. Factors affecting the secretion of staphylococcal enterotoxin A. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Sep;20(3):492–496. doi: 10.1128/am.20.3.492-496.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Markus Z., Silverman G. J. Enterotoxin B synthesis by replicating and nonreplicating cells of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1969 Feb;97(2):506–512. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.2.506-512.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McLean R. A., Lilly H. D., Alford J. A. Effects of meat-curing salts and temperature on production of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. J Bacteriol. 1968 Apr;95(4):1207–1211. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.4.1207-1211.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reiser R. F., Weiss K. F. Production of staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, and C in various media. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Dec;18(6):1041–1043. doi: 10.1128/am.18.6.1041-1043.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weirether F. J., Lewis E. E., Rosenwald A. J., Lincoln R. E. Rapid quantitative serological assay of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):284–291. doi: 10.1128/am.14.2.284-291.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu C. H., Bergdoll M. S. Stimulation of Enterotoxin B Production II. Synthetic Medium for Staphylococcal Growth and Enterotoxin B Production. Infect Immun. 1971 Jun;3(6):784–792. doi: 10.1128/iai.3.6.784-792.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES