Abstract
Dry mouth, which is characterized by decreased salivation, has a number of causes; the involvement of estrogen has been suggested as symptoms typically develop in middle-aged females. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of this condition. Soy isoflavones, a subgroup of flavonoids, are abundantly found in the soy germ. They are thought to exert a number of effects by specifically binding to estrogen receptors due to their structural similarity to estrogen. Recently, soy isoflavones have been found to exert antioxidant effects, ameliorating disorders caused by reactive oxygen/free radicals. Based on these observations, the effects of soybean isoflavones on impaired salivary secretion were studied in patients with dry mouth. Soy isoflavone aglycones were administered at 25 mg per day to 15 subjects with an average age of 67.9 ± 8.0 years for 2 months, and salivary secretion was analyzed. The results showed a significant improvement based on the saliva flow rate and self-completed questionnaire, thus suggesting the usefulness of isoflavones in improving the symptoms of salivary gland hypofunction.
Keywords: isoflavones, dry mouth, estrogen, salivary secretion, reactive oxygen species
Introduction
Studies have shown that dry mouth is a multi-factorial disease in which the saliva flow decreases, thereby resulting in not only mouth dryness, feelings of thirst, and difficulty in food ingestion but also dysgeusia, dental caries, periodontal disease, burning mouth, and reduced quality of life (QOL).(1) Although the pathogenesis of this disease is not yet fully elucidated, its incidence increases with age. The disease has been reported to be more common in postmenopausal women.(2) In addition, an in vivo mouse experiment demonstrated that ovariectomy resulted in decreased salivary secretion and that estrogen replacement ameliorated this decrease.(3) Although feelings of thirst have been reported to improve upon estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in patients with menopausal disorders,(4) an alternative method to ERT has been sought due to concerns of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) regarding the link between ERT and tumorigenesis.(5)
In recent years, oxidative stress has been proposed to play a role in accelerated aging(6) and in the pathogenesis of Sjogren’s syndrome (SS), which is characterized by severe mouth dryness in middle-aged females.(7) Particular oxygen radicals, such as superoxides and peroxides, mediate apoptosis,(8) thus causing oxidative damage to membrane lipids and proteins and reducing their function.(9) Furthermore, pathophysiological mechanisms involving oxidative damage have been reported.(10,11)
In addition, the various physiological effects of soybeans and a variety of soybean bioactive compounds have been investigated. Specifically, research on soy isoflavones has been undertaken, and estrogenic effects on bone metabolism and anti-cancer activity have been reported.(12–15)
Isoflavones are a subclass of flavonoids that are abundantly found in the pulse family, including soybeans, soy foods, and Japanese arrowroot, and exist in the glycoside or aglycone form. A total of 12 types of soy isoflavones are contained in soybean and soy germ (hypocotyl), including the aglycones (genistein, daidzein, and glycitein), three types of glycosides, and their acetyl and malonyl glycosides.(16) Although many aglycones are contained in fermented soybean products, such as miso and fermented soybeans, the isoflavones found in soybean or soybean products are typically glycosides. After ingestion, isoflavone glycosides are hydrolyzed by salivary enzymes,(17) enzymes found in the small intestinal mucosa,(18) and β-glucosidases from Enterobacteriaceae, thereby generating isoflavone aglycones(19,20) that are absorbed in the intestine to exert their effects.
Although the binding capacity of aglycones to estrogen receptors (ERs) differs according to the test method employed, it is reported to be weaker than that of estrogen.(21,22) Because of structural similarities to estrogen, aglycones specifically combine with ERs (α and β) and demonstrate estrogenic effects.(23,24) ER-α, which is abundant in the female genitalia, is also abundant in mammary glands, the hypothalamus, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle. ER-β is abundant in the prostate gland, ovary, lung, brain, blood vessels, bone,(25) and salivary glands.(26–28)
In addition, isoflavones exhibit antioxidative properties and ameliorating effects against free radical-induced damage of cell membrane lipids, lipoproteins,(29–33) and DNA.(34–37) In this study, the effects of soy isoflavones on dry mouth patients are examined.
Materials and Methods
Evaluation of isoflavone effects in subjects
Tablets containing 25 mg of isoflavones extracted from soy (aglycone equivalent, 23.6 mg) were provided by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Fifteen patients of the Dry Mouth Clinic of Tsurumi University Dental Hospital were enrolled in this study. The subjects included one male and fourteen females, ranging in age from 49 to 81 years (67.9 ± 8.0 years; mean ± SD). All fifteen subjects with dry mouth had a salivary secretion of less than 10 ml, as determined by the stimulated saliva flow rate (gum test). Ten patients were assigned to the SS group, and the remaining five to the non-SS group (Table 1). The diagnosis of SS was based on the diagnostic criteria.(38) Patients who had a medical history of significant cardiovascular disease, significant pulmonary obstructive disease, gastrointestinal obstructive disease, epilepsy, or Parkinson’s disease were excluded from the study. The enrolled subjects had subjective dry mouth that was attributable to various factors (e.g., SS, adverse medication effects, mental stress, and depression). All 15 subjects provided informed consent. Each participant consumed one test tablet per day. The evaluation of the effects was performed by measuring salivary secretion and by a self-completed questionnaire (15 questions about oral and eye conditions) before intake and after 1 and 2 months of isoflavone intake.
Table 1.
SS | Non-SS | |
---|---|---|
Number of Subjects | 10 | 5 |
Sex (male/female) | 1/9 | 0/5 |
Age | 66.9 ± 9.4 | 69.8 ± 4.6 |
Gum test (ml/10 min) | 3.59 ± 2.31 | 6.28 ± 2.05 |
Saxon test (g/2 min) | 1.84 ± 1.56 | 2.01 ± 1.53 |
Values represent the mean ± SD. SS, Sjogren’s syndrome; non-SS, dry mouth group.
Preparation of saliva
Tests were performed before intake and 1 and 2 months after oral intake of the isoflavone tablet. A piece of sterilized gauze was weighed before and after being chewed by a participant for 2 min (Saxon test). The difference between the two measurements (dry weight before chewing and wet weight after chewing) was regarded as the salivary secretion. The saliva samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min and then passed through an ultrafiltration membrane (pore size, 0.22 µm).
Measurement of oxidative stress
The filtered samples were subjected to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the measurement of the oxidative stress marker 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and the lipid peroxidation markers hexanoyl-lysine (HEL) and propanoyl-lysine (PRL) using an anti-8-OHdG monoclonal antibody (N45.1; Institute for the Control of Aging, Shizuoka, Japan), an anti-HEL monoclonal antibody (Institute for the Control of Aging), and an anti-PRL monoclonal antibody (Healthcare Systems Inc., Aichi, Japan), respectively. The marker 8-OHdG in the sample was analyzed by an antibody chip(39) that was developed by Healthcare Systems Inc. As an antigen, 8-OHdG-BSA was spotted and immobilized onto the chip. The sample was then applied to the chip with a specific monoclonal antibody against 8-OHdG.(40) The chip was further treated with anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody alkaline phosphatase labelled. The binding of the antibody was evaluated by chemiluminescence using CDP-Star. The amount of 8-OHdG was estimated by comparison with the standard curve of authentic 8-OHdG. HEL and PRL were tested in the same manner as 8-OHdG.
Measurement of isoflavones
The frozen saliva samples were thawed on ice. Three aliquots of saliva were transferred to sample tubes. The internal standard solution (genistein-d4, daidzein-d4, and equol-d4) was added to each saliva sample (400 µl) to obtain a concentration of 125 pmol/ml. After the addition of ascorbic acid (50 µl of 0.1% phosphoric acid), the samples were hydrolyzed in the presence of the enzyme (60 µg) in phosphate buffer (pH 5.3, 500 µl) for 2 h at 37°C. After hydrolysis, the isoflavones were extracted with ethyl acetate (1 ml) twice and concentrated using a centrifugal evaporator. The dried extract was redissolved in 20 µl of 20% acetonitrile containing 0.1% acetic acid. A portion (5 µl) of the solution was subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. An HPLC system (SI-2, Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a quadruple MS/MS system API 4000 Qtrap (AB SCIEX, Santa Clara, CA) was used, and data acquisition and mass spectrometric evaluation were conducted using Analyst 1.5.1 software (AB SCIEX). The HPLC gradient conditions were as follows: the ratio of methanol containing 0.1% acetic acid (solution B) was increased linearly against the 0.1% acetic acid (solution A) after 4 min from 20% to 60% over 11 min and then to 90% over 5 min with a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min on a Zorbax Eclipse XDB column (2.1 × 150 mm, 5 µm, Agilent Technologies, city, CA) at 40°C. Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) was used to perform mass spectrometric quantification of isoflavones (precursor ion to product ion transitions from m/z 241/119 for equol, m/z 245/123 for equol-d4, m/z 253/133 for daidzein, m/z 257/136 for daidzein-d4, m/z 269/133 for genistein, and m/z 273/136 for genistein-d4). The column eluent was introduced into the mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization in the negative-ion mode with a declustering potential of −90 V and ion spray voltage of –4,400 V. The temperature of the gas was 500°C. Nitrogen was used as the collision gas.
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed to test for the main effects of group (”SS” or ”non-SS”), time (”before intake” and ”after intake”), and their interaction. These analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Statistics ver. 19 (IBM Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The data were analyzed for statistical significance, and the significance level was set at p<0.05.
Ethics
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the Ethical Committee of Tsurumi University approved this study.
Results
Saliva flow rate
The saliva flow rate results are shown in Table 2. The Saxon test results showed a significant increase (p = 0.005) after 1 month (2.47 ± 1.66 g) and after 2 months (2.34 ± 1.65 g) compared with before intake (1.90 ± 1.50 g). No significant difference was found between the SS and non-SS groups.
Table 2.
Item | Before | After 1 month | After 2 months | Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source of variation | SS (Type III) | DF | MF | F | p value | |||||
Saxon | Total | 1.90 ± 1.50 | 2.47 ± 1.66 | 2.34 ± 1.65 | Time | 3.779 | 2.000 | 1.890 | 6.529 | 0.005* |
SS | 1.84 ± 1.56 | 2.10 ± 1.59 | 2.10 ± 1.72 | Time × SS or non-SS | 1.495 | 2.000 | 0.747 | 2.583 | 0.095 | |
non-SS | 2.01 ± 1.54 | 3.20 ± 1.71 | 2.84 ± 1.55 | SS or non-SS | 4.507 | 1.000 | 4.507 | 0.619 | 0.445 |
Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Values represent the mean ± SD. Total, all subjects; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome group; non-SS, dry mouth group; *Time, p < 0.05.
Oxidative stress markers
The oxidative stress results for the 8-OHdG, HEL, and PRL levels are shown in Table 3. No significant differences were found among the measured data. For 8-OHdG, the comparison of the amount before intake (6.12 ± 7.79 ng/ml) with the amounts after 1 month (3.82 ± 3.21 ng/ml) and 2 months (3.87 ± 3.48 ng/ml) revealed an insignificant decrease. Meanwhile, HEL showed an insignificant decrease when the amount before intake (7.12 ± 8.35 ng/ml) was compared with that after 1 month (4.53 ± 5.83 ng/ml) or 2 months (4.71 ± 4.43 ng/ml). In general, the levels of 8-OHdG and HEL tended to decrease following intake. In contrast, for PRL, the comparison of the amount before intake (5.61 ± 9.92 ng/ml) with the amounts 1 month (8.86 ± 14.20 ng/ml) and 2 months (8.21 ± 13.36 ng/ml) after intake revealed an insignificant increase.
Table 3.
Item | Before | After 1 month | After 2 months | Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source of variation | SS (Type III) | DF | MF | F | p value | |||||
8-OHdG (ng/ml) | Total | 6.12 ± 7.79 | 3.82 ± 3.21 | 3.87 ± 3.48 | Time | 61.042 | 2.000 | 30.521 | 1.628 | 0.216 |
SS | 5.77 ± 7.03 | 4.19 ± 3.07 | 4.16 ± 3.79 | Time × SS or non-SS | 9.474 | 2.000 | 4.737 | 0.253 | 0.779 | |
non-SS | 6.83 ± 10.03 | 3.07 ± 3.73 | 3.29 ± 3.06 | SS or non-SS | 0.961 | 1.000 | 0.961 | 0.019 | 0.893 | |
HEL (nmol/L) | Total | 7.12 ± 8.35 | 4.53 ± 5.83 | 4.71 ± 4.43 | Time | 40.953 | 2.000 | 20.476 | 1.522 | 0.237 |
SS | 7.19 ± 9.11 | 3.79 ± 3.46 | 4.21 ± 3.46 | Time × SS or non-SS | 10.621 | 2.000 | 5.310 | 0.395 | 0.678 | |
non-SS | 6.96 ± 7.56 | 6.01 ± 9.37 | 5.72 ± 6.32 | SS or non-SS | 13.617 | 1.000 | 13.617 | 0.131 | 0.723 | |
PRL (nmol/L) | Total | 5.61 ± 9.92 | 8.86 ± 14.20 | 8.21 ± 13.36 | Time | 42.960 | 2.000 | 21.480 | 0.280 | 0.758 |
SS | 7.82 ± 11.66 | 12.82 ± 16.17 | 11.73 ± 15.35 | Time × SS or non-SS | 49.170 | 2.000 | 24.585 | 0.320 | 0.729 | |
non-SS | 0.35 ± 0.55 | 0.64 ± 1.21 | 0.31 ± 0.64 | SS or non-SS | 938.030 | 1.000 | 938.029 | 3.282 | 0.093 |
Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Values represent the mean ± SD. Total, all subjects; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome group; non-SS, dry mouth group; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine; HEL, hexanoyl-lysine; PRL, propanoyl-lysine.
Isoflavone concentrations in saliva
The concentration of each isoflavone (daidzein, genistein, and equol) is shown in Table 4. A significant main effect of time (after intake vs before intake) was noted for daidzein and genistein. Daidzein showed a significant increase when the amount before intake (32 ± 54 µmol) was compared with the amounts after 1 month (11 ± 9.8 µmol) and 2 months (45 ± 55 µmol), (p = 0.047). For genistein, a comparison of the amount before intake (47 ± 70 µmol) with the amounts 1 month (20 ± 22 µmol) and 2 months (64 ± 72 µmol) after intake revealed a significant increase (p = 0.034). For equol, a comparison of the amount before intake (0.27 ± 0.45 µmol) with the amounts after 1 month (0.48 ± 1.0 µmol) and 2 months (0.23 ± 0.53 µmol) revealed no significant difference. We speculate that the smaller than anticipated changes were due to the limits in the sensitivity of the employed tests.
Table 4.
Item | Before | After 1 month | After 2 months | Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source of variation | SS (Type III) | DF | MF | F | p value | |||||
Equol (µmol) | Total | 0.27 ± 0.45 | 0.48 ± 1.00 | 0.23 ± 0.53 | Time | 1.148 | 2.000 | 0.574 | 0.418 | 0.664 |
SS | 0.35 ± 0.55 | 0.64 ± 1.2 | 0.31 ± 0.64 | Time × SS or non-SS | 1.278 | 2.000 | 0.639 | 0.465 | 0.634 | |
non-SS | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.18 ± 0.10 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | SS or non-SS | 0.131 | 1.000 | 0.131 | 0.086 | 0.774 | |
Daidzein (µmol) | Total | 32 ± 54 | 11 ± 9.8 | 45 ± 55 | Time | 8775.315 | 2.000 | 4387.658 | 3.452 | 0.047* |
SS | 41 ± 65 | 12 ± 11 | 40 ± 55 | Time × SS or non-SS | 2960.434 | 2.000 | 1480.217 | 1.165 | 0.328 | |
non-SS | 12 ± 18 | 9.7 ± 7.4 | 54 ± 61 | SS or non-SS | 383.663 | 1.000 | 383.663 | 0.102 | 0.755 | |
Genistein (µmol) | Total | 47 ± 70 | 20 ± 22 | 64 ± 72 | Time | 14901.865 | 2.000 | 7450.932 | 3.861 | 0.034* |
SS | 63 ± 82 | 22 ± 25 | 59 ± 69 | Time × SS or non-SS | 6863.201 | 2.000 | 3431.601 | 1.778 | 0.189 | |
non-SS | 13 ± 15 | 15 ± 13 | 73 ± 84 | SS or non-SS | 1933.870 | 1.000 | 1933.870 | 0.285 | 0.603 |
Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Values represent the mean ± SD. Total, all subjects; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome group; non-SS, dry mouth group; *Time, p < 0.05. Most of the equol scores were under the limit of detection.
Subjective measurements
The changes in the patient oral conditions are shown in Table 5. The results of the two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed the interaction between two main factors (time and SS vs non-SS) on ”dry mouth” (p = 0.031) and ”need water during eating” (p = 0.020). The condition of the eye regarding eyestrain, blurriness, dryness, and eye ache is shown in Table 6. No significant difference was found in any of the measured data.
Table 5.
Item | Before | After 1 month | After 2 months | Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source of variation | SS (Type III) | DF | MF | F | p value | |||||
Dry mouth | Total | 4.07 ± 1.44 | 4.00 ± 1.13 | 3.87 ± 1.06 | Time | 0.067 | 2.000 | 0.033 | 0.178 | 0.838 |
SS | 4.60 ± 1.26 | 4.30 ± 1.25 | 4.10 ± 1.20 | Time × SS or non-SS | 1.489 | 2.000 | 0.744 | 3.977 | 0.031* | |
non-SS | 3.00 ± 1.22 | 3.40 ± 0.55 | 3.40 ± 0.55 | SS or non-SS | 11.378 | 1.000 | 11.378 | 3.292 | 0.093 | |
Have a cough or phlegm | Total | 2.33 ± 1.05 | 2.53 ± 1.19 | 3.47 ± 4.96 | Time | 23.022 | 2.000 | 11.511 | 1.506 | 0.240 |
SS | 2.30 ± 1.16 | 2.50 ± 1.18 | 2.30 ± 1.06 | Time × SS or non-SS | 25.689 | 2.000 | 12.844 | 1.681 | 0.206 | |
non-SS | 2.40 ± 0.89 | 2.60 ± 1.34 | 5.80 ± 8.56 | SS or non-SS | 15.211 | 1.000 | 15.211 | 1.420 | 0.255 | |
Difficulty in chewing | Total | 2.67 ± 1.40 | 2.73 ± 1.16 | 2.60 ± 1.30 | Time | 0.089 | 2.000 | 0.044 | 0.100 | 0.906 |
SS | 2.80 ± 1.62 | 3.00 ± 1.25 | 2.80 ± 1.48 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.267 | 2.000 | 0.133 | 0.299 | 0.744 | |
non-SS | 2.40 ± 0.89 | 2.20 ± 0.84 | 2.20 ± 0.84 | SS or non-SS | 3.600 | 1.000 | 3.600 | 0.860 | 0.371 | |
Difficulty in swallowing | Total | 3.00 ± 1.41 | 3.07 ± 1.16 | 2.80 ± 1.37 | Time | 0.467 | 2.000 | 0.233 | 1.000 | 0.382 |
SS | 3.30 ± 1.57 | 3.40 ± 1.17 | 3.10 ± 1.52 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.022 | 2.000 | 0.011 | 0.048 | 0.954 | |
non-SS | 2.40 ± 0.89 | 2.40 ± 0.89 | 2.20 ± 0.84 | SS or non-SS | 8.711 | 1.000 | 8.711 | 1.935 | 0.188 | |
Difficulty in speaking | Total | 2.67 ± 1.35 | 2.80 ± 1.08 | 2.53 ± 1.19 | Time | 0.200 | 2.000 | 0.100 | 0.239 | 0.789 |
SS | 2.90 ± 1.52 | 3.00 ± 1.05 | 2.50 ± 1.27 | Time × SS or non-SS | 1.267 | 2.000 | 0.633 | 1.515 | 0.239 | |
non-SS | 2.20 ± 0.84 | 2.40 ± 1.14 | 2.60 ± 1.14 | SS or non-SS | 1.600 | 1.000 | 1.600 | 0.436 | 0.521 | |
Worried about mouth or tooth condition | Total | 3.40 ± 1.30 | 3.27 ± 1.49 | 2.87 ± 1.30 | Time | 1.867 | 2.000 | 0.933 | 2.220 | 0.129 |
SS | 2.60 ± 1.52 | 2.60 ± 1.82 | 2.20 ± 0.84 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.089 | 2.000 | 0.044 | 0.106 | 0.900 | |
non-SS | 2.60 ± 1.52 | 2.60 ± 1.82 | 2.20 ± 0.84 | SS or non-SS | 11.378 | 1.000 | 11.378 | 2.648 | 0.128 | |
Have tooth or mouth sensitivity | Total | 3.13 ± 1.46 | 3.07 ± 1.28 | 2.60 ± 1.40 | Time | 1.800 | 2.000 | 0.900 | 2.265 | 0.124 |
SS | 3.40 ± 1.26 | 3.20 ± 1.14 | 2.70 ± 1.42 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.467 | 2.000 | 0.233 | 0.587 | 0.563 | |
non-SS | 2.60 ± 1.82 | 2.80 ± 1.64 | 2.40 ± 1.52 | SS or non-SS | 2.500 | 1.000 | 2.500 | 0.485 | 0.498 | |
Need water when eating | Total | 3.87 ± 1.25 | 3.87 ± 1.30 | 3.67 ± 1.18 | Time | 0.022 | 2.000 | 0.011 | 0.056 | 0.945 |
SS | 4.20 ± 1.32 | 4.20 ± 1.40 | 3.70 ± 1.34 | Time × SS or non-SS | 1.800 | 2.000 | 0.900 | 4.558 | 0.020* | |
non-SS | 3.20 ± 0.84 | 3.20 ± 0.84 | 3.60 ± 0.89 | SS or non-SS | 4.900 | 1.000 | 4.900 | 1.203 | 0.293 | |
Mouth feels pasty | Total | 3.40 ± 1.30 | 3.33 ± 1.11 | 3.00 ± 1.31 | Time | 1.089 | 2.000 | 0.544 | 1.755 | 0.193 |
SS | 2.70 ± 1.49 | 2.90 ± 1.29 | 2.70 ± 1.34 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.556 | 2.000 | 0.278 | 0.895 | 0.421 | |
non-SS | 3.60 ± 1.34 | 3.20 ± 1.10 | 3.20 ± 1.30 | SS or non-SS | 0.178 | 1.000 | 0.178 | 0.041 | 0.842 | |
Painful tongue | Total | 2.80 ± 1.57 | 2.87 ± 1.41 | 2.80 ± 1.37 | Time | 0.000 | 2.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
SS | 2.70 ± 1.49 | 2.90 ± 1.29 | 2.70 ± 1.34 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.356 | 2.000 | 0.178 | 0.937 | 0.405 | |
non-SS | 3.00 ± 1.87 | 2.80 ± 1.79 | 3.00 ± 1.58 | SS or non-SS | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0.278 | 0.044 | 0.838 | |
Worried about bad breath | Total | 2.40 ± 1.06 | 2.53 ± 0.99 | 2.47 ± 0.99 | Time | 0.089 | 2.000 | 0.044 | 0.234 | 0.793 |
SS | 2.30 ± 0.95 | 2.50 ± 1.08 | 2.50 ± 1.08 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.267 | 2.000 | 0.133 | 0.703 | 0.504 | |
non-SS | 2.60 ± 1.34 | 2.60 ± 0.89 | 2.40 ± 0.89 | SS or non-SS | 0.100 | 1.000 | 0.100 | 0.034 | 0.856 |
Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Values represent mean ± SD. Total, all subjects; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome group; non-SS, dry mouth group; *Time × SS or non-SS, p < 0.05.
Table 6.
Item | Before | After 1 month | After 2 months | Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source of variation | SS (Type III) | DF | MF | F | p value | |||||
Eyestrain | Total | 3.13 ± 1.30 | 2.93 ± 1.39 | 3.00 ± 1.41 | Time | 0.622 | 2.000 | 0.311 | 1.411 | 0.262 |
SS | 3.10 ± 1.29 | 3.10 ± 1.52 | 3.10 ± 1.60 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.622 | 2.000 | 0.311 | 1.411 | 0.262 | |
non-SS | 3.20 ± 1.48 | 2.60 ± 1.14 | 2.80 ± 1.10 | SS or non-SS | 0.544 | 1.000 | 0.544 | 0.099 | 0.758 | |
Blurred vision | Total | 2.87 ± 1.46 | 2.87 ± 1.60 | 2.87 ± 1.46 | Time | 0.067 | 2.000 | 0.033 | 0.183 | 0.834 |
SS | 3.00 ± 1.63 | 2.90 ± 1.73 | 3.10 ± 1.60 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.600 | 2.000 | 0.300 | 1.648 | 0.212 | |
non-SS | 2.60 ± 1.14 | 2.80 ± 1.48 | 2.40 ± 1.14 | SS or non-SS | 1.600 | 1.000 | 1.600 | 0.236 | 0.635 | |
Dry eye | Total | 3.60 ± 1.40 | 3.47 ± 1.55 | 3.33 ± 1.45 | Time | 0.422 | 2.000 | 0.211 | 1.614 | 0.218 |
SS | 3.80 ± 1.48 | 3.70 ± 1.64 | 3.50 ± 1.51 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.067 | 2.000 | 0.033 | 0.255 | 0.777 | |
non-SS | 3.20 ± 1.30 | 3.00 ± 1.41 | 3.00 ± 1.41 | SS or non-SS | 3.600 | 1.000 | 3.600 | 0.560 | 0.468 | |
Eye pain | Total | 2.60 ± 1.64 | 2.47 ± 1.55 | 2.33 ± 1.54 | Time | 0.600 | 2.000 | 0.300 | 0.727 | 0.493 |
SS | 2.70 ± 1.77 | 2.60 ± 1.58 | 2.50 ± 1.72 | Time × SS or non-SS | 0.067 | 2.000 | 0.033 | 0.081 | 0.923 | |
non-SS | 2.40 ± 1.52 | 2.20 ± 1.64 | 2.00 ± 1.22 | SS or non-SS | 1.600 | 1.000 | 1.600 | 0.225 | 0.643 |
Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Values represent the mean ± SD. Total, all subjects; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome group; non-SS, dry mouth group.
Discussion
In a human intervention clinical trial, isoflavones were shown to be effective in the prevention and relief of menopausal symptoms.(41) Menopausal women with rapidly declining estrogen levels were reported to show decreased salivary secretion and intraoral discomfort.(42–44) In addition, considering reports that ERs are found in the salivary glands and that estrogen itself is secreted in the saliva, decreasing estrogen levels are assumed to affect salivary secretion. Furthermore, menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy showed improvements in a number of oral health-related complaints, such as dry mouth, glossalgia, periodontal disease, oral stickiness, and dysgeusia.(44,45) In this study, a significant effect was observed in the amount of saliva; oxidative stress levels showed a decreasing trend, and the interaction between isoflavone intake and the presence of SS was confirmed regarding the items ”dry mouth” and ”need water when eating” by the intake of 25 mg of soybean isoflavones (23 mg as aglycone) per day for two months in 15 subjects who recognized dry mouth symptoms. Therefore, the intake of isoflavones was thought to be effective in the relief of dry mouth that occurs in menopause and SS and of the general physical complaints of SS-affected individuals who presented with serious dry mouth.
As a result of measuring these three oxidative stress items before and after intake, 8-OHdG and HEL showed decreased levels and indicated the possibility that oxidative stress was reduced and the amount of saliva was increased by the intake of isoflavones. With regard to the antioxidant effect of isoflavones, the potential that the saliva secretional capacity was activated by eliminating oxidative stress and that the amount of saliva increased by activating the water secretion mechanism can be considered as an effect is expected in the improvement of the salivary secretion capacity by the continuous intake of isoflavones.
Furthermore, in a human study of isoflavone supplementation, a significant improvement in blood flow was found.(46) The components of saliva are derived from the blood and salivary glands, and the increase in salivary secretion was proposed to be due to ”the increased blood flow”. Thus, the possibility that the intake of isoflavones is useful for the recovery of salivary glands impaired by oxidative stress and for the improvement of blood flow is assumed in this study. Furthermore, the function of the salivary gland has likely been improved by the antioxidant effect of isoflavones against the oxidative stress of salivary glands, thereby improving the effect on blood flow. This potential mechanism may explain the significant promotion of saliva flow observed in our study. In the future, we aim to verify these results by analyzing the degree of the damage to salivary glands by oxidative stress and the direct effect of isoflavones on salivary glands.
With respect to the human intervention clinical trial, many effective cases found that the volume of isoflavone aglycones that should be ingested per day is at least 30 mg and that the ingestion period should be at least two weeks; in this study, the ingested amount was 25 mg, and the ingestion period was two months.(47–50)
The study by NIH reported that that ”Isoflavone aglycone decreases the vasomotor symptom of menopause by 10–20%”.(51) With regard to this study, menopause symptoms, with a focus on ”hot flash” symptoms, are thought to be improved by the intake of 30–60 mg of soy isoflavone aglycone per day for at least two weeks in the United States and Europe. A study evaluating the effects of isoflavones reported that differences in the metabolism of isoflavones by Enterobacteriaceae affected isoflavone potency.(52,53) Because intestinal bacterial flora differs among individuals as shown in previous studies and the average age of the subjects was older than 60 years, the potential change in bacterial flora is thought to be affected by increasing age and a decrease in the number of bacteria. Furthermore, approximately 50% of Asians are equol producers and contain the intestinal bacteria required to convert daidzein into equol, which may have affected the efficacy of this evaluation of isoflavones.(54–58) Thus, we are planning to conduct the analysis with consideration of the equol-producing ability of individuals.
In this study, isoflavone intake is thought to act as an antioxidant in salivary glands impaired by oxidative stress, and the salivary function was likely improved by the increased blood flow. As the salivary secretion amounts of the subjects showed an increasing trend without any accompanying side effects, such as sweating and polyuria, which may be caused by salivary secretion promoters, an improvement in the QOL was confirmed. We aim to study the detailed mechanism in future studies.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant for research project for new demand creation of agricultural products of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan.
The authors gratefully thank Ai Niimi and Judith Nishino for helpful discussions during the preparation of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ERs
estrogen receptors
- HEL
hexanoyl-lysine
- HRT
hormone replacement therapy
- LDL
low-density lipoprotein
- 8-OHdG
8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine
- PRL
propanoyl-lysine
- QOL
quality of life
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SS
Sjogren’s syndrome
Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
- 1.Chambers MS, Garden AS, Kies MS, Martin JW. Radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer: pathogenesis, impact on quality of life, and management. Head Neck. 2004;26:796–807. doi: 10.1002/hed.20045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flink H.Studies on the prevalence of reduced salivary flow rate in relation to general health and dental caries, and effect of iron supplementation Swed Dent J Suppl 20073–50., 2 p preceding table of contents. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bjorling DE, Beckman M, Clayton MK, Wang ZY. Modulation of nerve growth factor in peripheral organs by estrogen and progesterone. Neuroscience. 2002;110:155–167. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00568-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jansson C, Johansson S, Lindh-Astrand L, Hoffmann M, Hammar M. The prevalence of symptoms possibly related to the climacteric in pre- and postmenopausal women in Linköping, Sweden. Maturitas. 2003;45:129–135. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(03)00127-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shapiro S, Farmer RD, Seaman H, Stevenson JC, Mueck AO. Does hormone replacement therapy cause breast cancer? An application of causal principles to three studies: Part 1. The Collaborative Reanalysis. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011;37:103–109. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc.2011.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Helbock HJ, Beckman KB, Shigenaga MK, et al. DNA oxidation matters: the HPLC-electrochemical detection assay of 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine and 8-oxo-guanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:288–293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ryo K, Ito A, Takatori R, et al. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on salivary secretion. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:669–674. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maheshwari A, Misro MM, Aggarwal A, Sharma RK, Nandan D. Pathways involved in testicular germ cell apoptosis induced by H2O2 in vitro. FEBS J. 2009;276:870–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dukan S, Farewell A, Ballesteros M, Taddei F, Radman M, Nyström T. Protein oxidation in response to increased transcriptional or translational errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:5746–5749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100422497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Babbar N, Casero RA., Jr Tumor necrosis factor-alpha increases reactive oxygen species by inducing spermine oxidase in human lung epithelial cells: a potential mechanism for inflammation-induced carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11125–11130. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature. 2006;440:944–948. doi: 10.1038/nature04634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mei J, Yeung SS, Kung AW. High dietary phytoestrogen intake is associated with higher bone mineral density in postmenopausal but not premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5217–5221. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.8040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Adlercreutz CH, Goldin BR, Gorbach SL, et al. Soybean phytoestrogen intake and cancer risk. J Nutr. 1995;125:757S–770S. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.3_Suppl.757S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kumar NB, Cantor A, Allen K, Riccardi D, Cox CE. The specific role of isoflavones on estrogen metabolism in premenopausal women. Cancer. 2002;94:1166–1174. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wietrzyk J, Boratynski J, Grynkiewicz G, Ryczynski A, Radzikowski C, Opolski A. Antiangiogenic and antitumour effects in vivo of genistein applied alone or combined with cyclophosphamide. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:3893–3896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reinli K, Block G. Phytoestrogen content of foods—a compendium of literature values. Nutr Cancer. 1996;26:123–148. doi: 10.1080/01635589609514470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Walle T, Browning AM, Steed LL, Reed SG, Walle UK. Flavonoid glucosides are hydrolyzed and thus activated in the oral cavity in humans. J Nutr. 2005;135:48–52. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wilkinson AP, Gee JM, Dupont MS, et al. Hydrolysis by lactase phlorizin hydrolase is the first step in the uptake of daidzein glucosides by rat small intestine in vitro. Xenobiotica. 2003;33:255–264. doi: 10.1080/0049825021000058088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rowland I, Faughnan M, Hoey L, Wähälä K, Williamson G, Cassidy A. Bioavailability of phyto-oestrogens. Br J Nutr. 2003;89 (Suppl 1):S45–S58. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xu X, Harris KS, Wang HJ, Murphy PA, Hendrich S. Bioavailability of soybean isoflavones depends upon gut microflora in women. J Nutr. 1995;125:2307–2315. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.9.2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, et al. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology. 1998;139:4252–4263. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.10.6216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sekizawa J, Ohya Y. Quantitative risk-benefit analysis of the health effects of phytoestrogens to Japanese. Jpn J Risk Anal. 1999;11:75–82. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Markiewicz L, Garey J, Adlercreutz H, Gurpide E. In vitro bioassays of non-steroidal phytoestrogens. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1993;45:399–405. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(93)90009-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miksicek RJ. Estrogenic flavonoids: structural requirements for biological activity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1995;208:44–50. doi: 10.3181/00379727-208-43830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goodman LS, Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (10th ed) New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 2047. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Molteni A, Warpeha RL, Brizio-Molteni L, Fors EM. Estradiol receptor-binding protein in head and neck neoplastic and normal tissue. Arch Surg. 1981;116:207–210. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380140053012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Campbell PS, Ben-Aryeh H, Swanson KA. Differential distribution of an estrogen receptor in the submandibular and parotid salivary glands of female rats. Endocr Res. 1990;16:333–345. doi: 10.1080/07435809009033010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Camacho-Arroyo I, Cerbón MA, Gamboa-Domínguez A, González-Agüero G, González-Mariscal G. Immunocytochemical detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the rabbit submandibular gland. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 1999;123:179–186. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(99)00048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Arora A, Nair MG, Strasburg GM. Antioxidant activities of isoflavones and their biological metabolites in a liposomal system. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;356:133–141. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hodgson JM, Craft KD, Puddey IB, Mori TA, Beilin LJ. Soybean isoflavonoids and their metabolic products inhibit in vitro lipoprotein oxidation in serum. J Nutr Biochem. 1996;7:664–669. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kapiotis S, Hermann M, Held I, Seelos C, Ehringer H, Gmeiner BM. Genistein, the dietary-derived angiogenesis inhibitor, prevents LDL oxidation and protects endothelial cells from damage by atherogenic LDL. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2868–2874. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.11.2868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mitchell JH, Gardner PT, McPhail DB, Morrice PC, Collins AR, Duthie GG. Antioxidant efficacy of phytoestrogens in chemical and biological model systems. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;360:142–148. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ruiz-Larrea MB, Mohan AR, Paganga G, Miller NJ, Bolwell GP, Rice-Evans CA. Antioxidant activity of phytoestrogenic isoflavones. Free Radic Res. 1997;26:63–70. doi: 10.3109/10715769709097785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erba D, Casiraghi MC, Martinez-Conesa C, Goi G, Massaccesi L. Isoflavone supplementation reduces DNA oxidative damage and increases O-β-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase activity in healthy women. Nutr Res. 2012;32:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Giles D, Wei H. Effect of structurally related flavones/isoflavones on hydrogen peroxide production and oxidative DNA damage in phorbol ester-stimulated HL-60 cells. Nutr Cancer. 1997;29:77–82. doi: 10.1080/01635589709514605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sahin K, Akdemir F, Tuzcu M, et al. Genistein suppresses spontaneous oviduct tumorigenesis in quail. Nutr Cancer. 2009;61:799–806. doi: 10.1080/01635580903285163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sahin K, Tuzcu M, Sahin N, et al. Inhibitory effects of combination of lycopene and genistein on 7,12-dimethyl benz(a)anthracene-induced breast cancer in rats. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63:1279–1286. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2011.606955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fox RI, Saito I. Criteria for diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1994;20:391–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ikawa T, Hoshino F, Matsuyama T, Takahashi H, Watanabe O. Molecular-shape imprinting and immobilization of biomolecules on a polymer containing azo dye. Langmuir. 2006;22:2747–2753. doi: 10.1021/la0528394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hisaka S, Kato Y, Kitamoto N, et al. Chemical and immunochemical identification of propanoyllysine derived from oxidized n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;46:1463–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Messina M, Hughes C. Efficacy of soyfoods and soybean isoflavone supplements for alleviating menopausal symptoms is positively related to initial hot flush frequency. J Med Food. 2003;6:1–11. doi: 10.1089/109662003765184697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Streckfus CF, Baur U, Brown LJ, Bacal C, Metter J, Nick T. Effects of estrogen status and aging on salivary flow rates in healthy Caucasian women. Gerontology. 1998;44:32–39. doi: 10.1159/000021980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kullander S, Sonesson B. Studies on saliva in menstruating, pregnant and post-menopausal women. Acta Endocrinol. 1965;48:329–336. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0480329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wardrop RW, Hailes J, Burger H, Reade PC. Oral discomfort at menopause. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989;67:535–540. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90269-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Giuca MR, Carli E, Pasini M, Bonfigli D, Cappè MR. Evaluation of efficacy of estrogen and phytotherapy in oral cavity alterations of women in menopause. Minerva Ginecol. 2009;61:13–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Kono N, et al. Isoflavone soy protein supplementation and atherosclerosis progression in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2011;42:3168–3175. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Howes LG, Howes JB, Knight DC. Isoflavone therapy for menopausal flushes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2006;55:203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jacobs A, Wegewitz U, Sommerfeld C, Grossklaus R, Lampen A. Efficacy of isoflavones in relieving vasomotor menopausal symptoms—a systematic review. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:1084–1097. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200800552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu J, Ho SC, Su YX, Chen WQ, Zhang CX, Chen YM. Effect of long-term intervention of soy isoflavones on bone mineral density in women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Bone. 2009;44:948–953. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Taku K, Umegaki K, Ishimi Y, Watanabe S. Effects of extracted soy isoflavones alone on blood total and LDL cholesterol: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008;4:1097–1103. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kurzer MS. Phytoestrogen supplement use by women. J Nutr. 2003;133:1983S–1986S. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.6.1983S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rowland IR, Wiseman H, Sanders TA, Adlercreutz H, Bowey EA. Interindividual variation in metabolism of soy isoflavones and lignans: influence of habitual diet on equol production by the gut microflora. Nutr Cancer. 2000;36:27–32. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC3601_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zheng Y, Hu J, Murphy PA, Alekel DL, Franke WD, Hendrich S. Rapid gut transit time and slow fecal isoflavone disappearance phenotype are associated with greater genistein bioavailability in women. J Nutr. 2003;133:3110–3116. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.10.3110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Arai Y, Uehara M, Sato Y, et al. Comparison of isoflavones among dietary intake, plasma concentration and urinary excretion for accurate estimation of phytoestrogen intake. J Epidemiol. 2000;10:127–135. doi: 10.2188/jea.10.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gil-Izquierdo A, Penalvo JL, Gil JI, et al. Soy isoflavones and cardiovascular disease epidemiological, clinical and -omics perspectives. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:624–631. doi: 10.2174/138920112799857585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Song KB, Atkinson C, Frankenfeld CL, et al. Prevalence of daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes differs between Caucasian and Korean American women and girls. J Nutr. 2006;136:1347–1351. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.5.1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu B, Qin L, Liu A, et al. Prevalence of the equol-producer phenotype and its relationship with dietary isoflavone and serum lipids in healthy Chinese adults. J Epidemiol. 2010;20:377–384. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20090185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Guo K, Zhang B, Chen C, et al. Daidzein-metabolising phenotypes in relation to serum lipids and uric acid in adults in Guangzhou, China. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:118–124. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]