Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2013 May 30;35(6):652–657. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12109

Determination of APTT factor sensitivity – the misguiding guideline

A S Lawrie *,, S Kitchen , M Efthymiou *, I J Mackie *, S J Machin *
PMCID: PMC4229062  PMID: 23718922

Abstract

Introduction

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has produced a guideline detailing how to determine the activated partial thromboplastin time’s (APTT) sensitivity to clotting factor deficiencies, by mixing normal and deficient plasmas. Using the guideline, we determined the factor sensitivity of two APTT reagents.

Methods

APTTs were performed using Actin FS and Actin FSL on a Sysmex CS-5100 analyser. The quality of factor-deficient and reference plasmas from three commercial sources was assessed by assaying each of the clotting factors within the plasmas and by performing thrombin generation tests (TGT).

Results

Testing samples from 50 normal healthy subjects gave a two-standard deviation range of 21.8–29.2 s for Actin FS and 23.5–29.3 s for Actin FSL. The upper limits of these ranges were subsequently used to determine APTT factor sensitivity. Assay of factor levels within the deficient plasmas demonstrated that they were specifically deficient in a single factor, with most other factors in the range 50–150 iu/dL (Technoclone factor VII-deficient plasma has 26 iu/dL factor IX). APTTs performed on mixtures of normal and deficient plasmas gave diverse sensitivity to factor deficiencies dependent on the sources of deficient plasma. TGT studies on the deficient plasmas revealed that the potential to generate thrombin was not solely associated with the levels of their component clotting factors.

Conclusion

Determination of APTT factor sensitivity in accordance with the CLSI guideline can give inconsistent and misleading results.

Keywords: APTT, plasma clotting factors

Introduction

The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is a central component of any screen for haemostatic patency. The test is used to detect the deficiency of intrinsic clotting factors (VIII, IX, XI, or XII), the presence of lupus anticoagulant and the monitoring of unfractionated heparin therapy, although this latter function is becoming less common in many countries as unfractionated heparin has to a large extent been replaced with low molecular weight heparin. Consequently, the major role of the APTT at many centres is now detection of clotting factor deficiencies either in the form of a preoperative clotting screen or in patients who present with a history of a haemorrhagic diathesis. However, APTT reagents show different sensitivities to deficiencies of factors VIII, IX, XI and XII; this is thought to be because of differences in the activator or phospholipids used in the reagent 1,2.

Using samples from patients with congenital clotting factor deficiencies, we have previously assessed the sensitivity of two widely used APTT reagents, Actin FS and Actin FSL (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) 3. Collection of clinical samples from patients with a single congenital coagulation factor deficiency (factors VIII, IX, XI or XII deficient) at appropriate levels of activity (i.e. 10–50%) taken into the sample tubes employed in a specific institute for a study of this type presents a logistical problem that would be beyond the capabilities of many general hospitals. Consequently, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Guideline 4 offers an alternative means of assessing APTT’s sensitivity to clotting factor deficiencies, which claims to circumvent this logistical problem.

The Guideline 4 requires that APTTs are performed on factor-deficient plasmas (i.e. factors VIII, IX, XI and XII) to which normal control plasma is added to give a range of relative potencies (<1 to 100%) for factors VIII, IX, XI and XII. However, as the APTT is a global test, the resultant clotting times would be influenced by the levels of all clotting factors within the spiked deficient plasma, not just the level of the clotting factor that had been adjusted. To investigate the influence of the factor-deficient plasma and normal plasma used, we determined the sensitivity of Actin FS and Actin FSL using three sources of plasma. The quality of factor-deficient plasma was also assessed in a thrombin generation test 5.

Samples and Methods

Unless otherwise stated, all tests were performed on a Sysmex CS-5100 analyser (Sysmex UK Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK), and reagents were from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics (Marburg, Germany). In addition to normal reference plasma and factor-deficient plasma from Siemens, lyophilized factor-deficient and reference plasmas were also obtained from Technoclone (Vienna, Austria). Frozen reference and factor-deficient plasmas (Cryocheck™) were obtained from Precision BioLogic (Nova Scotia, Canada).

Normal reference ranges for the two APTT reagents, Actin FS and Actin FSL, were confirmed using plasma samples from 50 healthy normal individuals. APTT quality control imprecision studies, using Actin FS and Actin FSL, were performed using commercial lyophilized normal (Control Plasma N [CPN]) and pathologically low plasmas (Control Plasma P [CPP] and CiTrol 2). Ten replicates of each preparation were tested on each of 5 days.

Factor assays were performed using either Actin FS (for factors VIII, IX, XI and XII) or Innovin (for factors II, V, VII and X). Fibrinogen concentration was measured using the Clauss technique. Levels of the component clotting factors within the Siemens, Technoclone and Cryocheck™ factor-deficient plasmas were determined relative to the Siemens reference preparation (Standard Human Plasma [SHP]). Similarly, the levels of clotting factors within the Technoclone and Cryocheck™ Reference plasmas were assayed relative to the SHP. The factor assays were all performed with samples tested at multiple dilutions, which facilitated an assessment of linearity and parallelism of dose response and thus detect possible inhibitory activity or falsely high results caused by sample activation 6.

The sensitivity of APTT reagents to coagulation factor deficiency was assessed using factor-deficient plasmas spiked with normal plasma to give samples with 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20% and 10% activity of the single factor. For this process, Siemens deficient plasmas (factors VIII, IX, XI and XII) were spiked with Siemens SHP, Technoclone deficient plasmas with Technoclone Coagulation Reference Plasma and Cryocheck™ deficient plasmas with Cryocheck™ normal reference plasma. Each of the spiked plasma samples was assayed to confirm the activity of the single factor.

Thrombin generation test (TGT) studies were performed on the factors VIII-, IX-, XI- and XII-deficient plasma using the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) system as described by Hemker et al. 5 (Thrombinoscope BV, Maastricht, the Netherlands) in conjunction with the manufacturer’s PPP-low reagents, which gives a reaction concentrations of 1 pm tissue factor (TF)/4 μm phospholipid (PL) (Thrombinoscope BV). The thrombin generation test (TGT) provides information relating to the dynamics of thrombin generation (TG), and the TG curve is described in terms of the lag time, the time to peak, peak thrombin and the area under the TG curve, known also as the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP).

Results

The normal reference ranges for APTTs performed using Actin FS and Actin FSL were confirmed by testing the plasma from 50 healthy normal individuals. This process gave a mean ± two-standard deviation range of 21.8–29.2 s for Actin FS and 23.5–29.3 s for Actin FSL. The upper limits of these ranges were subsequently used to determine APTT factor sensitivity. Reproducibility of the APTT assessed using commercial lyophilized normal and pathologically low plasmas yielded similarly low levels of imprecision for both Actin FS and Actin FSL (Table 1).

Table 1.

APTT imprecision using three levels of commercial quality control plasma

Control Plasma N Ci-Trol Level 2 Control Plasma P
Reagents Mean (s) SD (s) CV (%) Mean (s) SD (s) CV (%) Mean (s) SD (s) CV (%)
Actin FS 26.1 0.12 0.48 44.8 0.23 0.50 51.3 0.68 1.33
Actin FSL 26.2 0.09 0.36 42.3 0.22 0.51 74.7 1.51 2.03

Factor assays performed to assess the levels of the component clotting factors within the Siemens, Technoclone and Cryocheck™ factor-deficient plasmas confirmed normal activity (50–150 iu/dL) of each of the clotting factors present (Table 2). Only one of the deficient plasmas was found to have an equivocal level of a relevant clotting factor (Technoclone factor VIII-deficient plasma, factor XI level 50 iu/dL) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Levels of coagulation factors in commercial deficient plasmas

Def Plasma Fg (g/L) FII (iu/dL) FV (iu/dL) FVII (iu/dL) FVIII (iu/dL) FIX (iu/dL) FX (iu/dL) FXI (iu/dL) FXII (iu/dL)
Technoclone
 FII 2.75 <1.0 92 125 79 105 104 77 102
 FV 3.31 109 <1.0 106 72 124 116 99 115
 FVII 2.88 109 91 <1.0 83 26 103 83 102
 FVIII 2.18 96 89 126 <1.0 98 105 50 63
 FIX 3.14 85 123 72 100 <1.0 107 67 98
 FX 2.44 102 80 109 106 84 <1.0 61 113
 FXI 2.34 115 111 138 82 92 91 <1.0 73
 FXII 2.31 95 91 122 92 112 96 82 <1.0
 Ref Plasma 2.75 98 93 114 98 111 99 87 93
Siemens
 FII 2.15 <1.0 92 97 74 79 89 74 93
 FV 1.90 82 <1.0 85 70 76 84 76 85
 FVII 2.13 82 86 <1.0 78 78 80 76 83
 FVIII 1.95 78 81 85 <1.0 74 80 67 55
 FIX 2.34 90 103 102 68 <1.0 98 83 86
 FX 2.44 94 95 103 74 92 <1.0 84 95
 FXI 1.99 84 91 86 73 77 88 <1.0 84
 FXII 2.37 97 97 105 80 93 99 82 <1.0
 Ref Plasma 2.48 94 87 94 90 93 92 88 98
CryoCheck
 FII 2.18 <1.0 92 117 95 116 114 94 110
 FV 2.84 110 <1.0 123 110 123 120 102 113
 FVII 2.84 109 103 <1.0 105 118 114 102 116
 FVIII 2.13 117 106 137 <1.0 130 126 111 107
 FIX 2.84 111 106 131 105 <1.0 127 97 116
 FX 2.75 108 88 124 96 110 <1.0 90 112
 FXI 2.93 109 114 115 106 115 122 <1.0 107
 FXII 2.75 112 79 144 103 123 123 99 <1.0
 Ref Plasma 2.63 112 120 123 109 123 123 104 107

The highlighted coagulation factor levels are either equivocal or below the normal reference range.

Using the upper limit of the APTT reference ranges, the sensitivity of APTT reagents to a single coagulation factor deficiency was determined with factor-deficient plasma spiked with normal plasma to give samples of 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20% and 10% activity (an example of which is seen in Figure 1). Data from this study demonstrated that APTT’s sensitivity to clotting factor deficiency was influenced by the source of deficient and normal reference plasma used (Table 3). Thrombin generation studies revealed that the potential to generate thrombin was not solely related to the levels of clotting factors present in the deficient plasma (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Determination of Actin FS Factor Sensitivity using CryoCheck Frozen Factor-Deficient Plasma.

Table 3.

Level of intrinsic clotting factor detected at Upper Limit of APTT

Deficient Plasma APTT Upper Limit (s) Actin FS 29.2 Actin FSL 29.3
Technoclone F. VIII Activity (%) 68 66
Siemens 73 62
CryoCheck 32 32
Technoclone F. IX Activity (%) 58 46
Siemens 76 56
CryoCheck 32 25
Technoclone F. XI Activity (%) 58 46
Siemens 71 50
CryoCheck 52 25
Technoclone F. XII Activity (%) 22 22
Siemens 78 50
CryoCheck 14 18

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Thrombin generation curves for FVIII- and FIX-deficient plasmas – 1 pm TF. CC: Cryocheck, TC: Technoclone, S: Siemens. ETP: Endogenous thrombin potential. % ETP and % Peak were calculated by expressing the specific activity of these parameters as percentage of the normal reference plasma processed in the same assay.

Discussion

Central to the role of the APTT is an understanding of its ability to detect clotting factor deficiencies. As the APTT is a global clotting test, a normal APTT does not necessarily indicate that all clotting factors within the intrinsic coagulation pathway (factors VIII, IX, XI and XII) are normal. A deficiency of one intrinsic clotting factor can be masked by an elevated level of another. For example, FVIII elevated by an acute phase response can mask a mild or even moderate deficiency of factor IX or XI. For this reason, when defining the sensitivity of an APTT reagent to a single-factor deficiency, it is essential to determine the quality of the samples used for this process by measuring all intrinsic clotting factors in the samples and the precision with which the instrumentation measures the APTT.

Our imprecision data (Table 1) demonstrated highly reproducible APTTs at the three levels of quality control with both the Actin FS and Actin FSL reagents. Importantly, we also demonstrated that each of the factor-deficient plasmas used in the study was specifically deficient in a single clotting factor while the other component clotting factors were present at normal levels (50–150 iu/dL), as shown in Table 2. Consequently, when the deficient plasmas were spiked with normal plasmas to yield a range of relative potencies, as suggested by the CSLI guideline 4, it was interesting to observe the wide range of clotting factor activities that were associated with the APTT upper limit of the normal reference range using Actin FS and Actin FSL (Table 3).

As would be anticipated, when TGT studies were performed using a TF trigger, the FXII-deficient plasmas gave a normal thrombin generation (TG) curve while the FX-, FVII-, FV- and FII-deficient plasmas gave no TG under the test conditions described (data not shown). However, the FVIII- and FIX-deficient plasma TGT results were intriguing because those plasmas with the highest levels of component clotting factors (i.e. Cryocheck™, frozen plasma) gave the lowest level of TG while the plasma with the lowest levels of clotting factors (i.e. Siemens, lyophilized plasma) gave the highest level of TG. This suggested that the potential to generate thrombin was not solely associated with the level of component clotting factors; it could be speculated that lyophilized deficient plasmas may contain a procoagulant material 7 that only exerts an effect in TGT or in a test system such as that described in the CSLI guideline 4. This does not mean lyophilized plasmas are unsuitable for their intended use (i.e. one-stage clotting assays), as each of the deficient plasmas produced sensitive dose–response curves in one-stage clotting assays.

We conclude that determination of APTT factor sensitivity performed in accordance with CLSI Document H47-A2 4 can give inconsistent and misleading results, and this approach should not be used in routine laboratory practice. Consequently, detection limits should either be determined by the reagent manufacturers for specific instrument/reagent systems or by individual laboratories using well-characterized samples from patients with inherited coagulation deficiencies. We would suggest testing a minimum of 20 deficient samples with potencies evenly distributed in the range 10–50% for each of the intrinsic coagulation factors (factors VIII, IX, XI and XII).

Disclosures

The Haemostasis Research Unit at University College London has previously received an unrestricted educational grant from Sysmex UK Ltd.

References

  1. Bowyer A, Kitchen S, Makris M. The responsiveness of different APTT reagents to mild factor VIII, IX and XI deficiencies. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:154–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2010.01261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mikaelsson M, Oswaldsson U, Sandberg H. Influence of phospholipids on the assessment of factor VIII activity. Haemophilia. 1998;4:646–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.1998.440646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lawrie AS, Kitchen S, Purdy G, Mackie IJ, Preston FE, Machin SJ. Assessment of Actin FS and Actin FSL sensitivity to specific clotting factor deficiencies. Clin Lab Haematol. 1998;20:179–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2257.1998.00122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. 2008. One-stage prothrombin (PT) test and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) test. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Document H47-A2.
  5. Hemker HC, Giesen P, Al Dieri R, Regnault V, de Smedt E, Wagenvoord R, Lecompte T, Béguin S. Calibrated automated thrombin generation measurement in clotting plasma. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2003;33:4–15. doi: 10.1159/000071636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mackie I, Cooper P, Lawrie A, Kitchen S, Gray E, Laffan M. Guidelines on the laboratory aspects of assays used in haemostasis and thrombosis. Int J Lab Hematol. 2013;35:1–13. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirst CF, Poller L. The cause of turbidity in lyophilised plasmas and its effects on coagulation tests. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45:701–3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.8.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Laboratory Hematology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES