Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
letter
. 2014 Nov;60(11):986.

Not antagonist treatment

Robert Newman 1, Susan Gevertz 2
PMCID: PMC4229155  PMID: 25392436

Regarding the article “Safety of the newer class of opioid antagonists in pregnancy,”1 the title of the article notwithstanding, its focus—the buprenorphinenaloxone combination—is not antagonist treatment. Rather, it is treatment with an opioid—buprenorphine—that has both agonist and antagonist properties, but a therapeutic effect due entirely to the former. With or without naloxone, buprenorphine is intended to eliminate or minimize withdrawal symptoms and establish a high degree of tolerance so that supplemental opioids will not produce euphoria, respiratory depression, sedation, etc. Precisely the same statement, of course, applies to methadone. The only rationale for adding the antagonist naloxone to buprenorphine is the hope that it will lessen the likelihood of misuse by parenteral routes of administration.2

The new data presented in the article do not seem to have relevance in deciding clinical management of opioid-dependent pregnant women. The experiences of only 10 babies are reported, 8 having been born to mothers taking maintenance therapy throughout pregnancy and 2 born to mothers for whom buprenorphinenaloxone was initiated during the first trimester. As the study was a retrospective chart review of live births, no information could be gathered regarding retention of the expectant mothers in treatment (retention for dependence or for prenatal care). This is an omission of particular importance, as the MOTHER (Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research) study, cited by the authors, reported that 33% of women who started taking buprenorphine dropped out before giving birth—almost 10% after the very first dose.3

It must also be noted that “[initial doses of] buprenorphine (and particularly buprenorphine/naloxone) can precipitate an opioid withdrawal syndrome if administered to a patient who is opioid dependent.”4 This is a particular concern when buprenorphine is initiated during pregnancy, as “[o] pioid withdrawal has been associated with poor fetal growth, preterm delivery, and fetal death.”5 The authors of the Motherisk article state at the outset that the “standard for managing opioid dependence in pregnant women is methadone maintenance.”1 Nothing in the article seems to challenge that conclusion.

Footnotes

Competing interests

None declared

References

  • 1.Poon S, Pupco A, Koren G, Bozzo P. Safety of the newer class of opioid antagonists in pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:631–2. (Eng), e348–9 (Fr). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.US Food and Drug Administration. Subutex and suboxone questions and answers. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2014. Available from: www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm191523.htm. Accessed 2014 Jul 22. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones HE, Kaltenbach K, Heil SH, Stine SM, Coyle MG, Arria AM, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure. N Eng J Med. 2010;363(24):2320–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Treatment protocols. Clinical guidelines for the use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid addiction. Treatment improvement protocol series, No. 40. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64246/. Accessed 2014 Jul 22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dashe JS, Jackson GL, Olscher DA, Zane EH, Wendel GD., Jr Opioid detoxification in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(5):854–8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00312-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES