Abstract
In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a genetic disruption of dystrophin protein expression results in repeated muscle injury and chronic inflammation. Magnetic resonance imaging shows promise as a surrogate outcome measure in both DMD and rehabilitation medicine that is capable of predicting clinical benefit years in advance of functional outcome measures. The mdx mouse reproduces the dystrophin deficiency that causes DMD and is routinely used for preclinical drug testing. There is a need to develop sensitive, non-invasive outcome measures in the mdx model that can be readily translatable to human clinical trials. Here we report the use of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy techniques for the non-invasive monitoring of muscle damage in mdx mice. Using these techniques, we studied dystrophic mdx muscle in mice from 6 to 12 weeks of age, examining both the peak disease phase and natural recovery phase of the mdx disease course. T2 and fat-suppressed imaging revealed significant levels of tissue with elevated signal intensity in mdx hindlimb muscles at all ages; spectroscopy revealed a significant deficiency of energy metabolites in 6-week-old mdx mice. As the mdx mice progressed from the peak disease stage to the recovery stage of disease, each of these phenotypes was either eliminated or reduced, and the cross-sectional area of the mdx muscle was significantly increased when compared to that of wild-type mice. Histology indicates that hyper-intense MRI foci correspond to areas of dystrophic lesions containing inflammation as well as regenerating, degenerating and hypertrophied myofibers. Statistical sample size calculations provide several robust measures with the ability to detect intervention effects using small numbers of animals. These data establish a framework for further imaging or preclinical studies, and they support the development of MRI as a sensitive, non-invasive outcome measure for muscular dystrophy.
Introduction
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common lethal genetic muscle disease diagnosed in children. Dystrophin-deficient mdx mice are a naturally occurring genetic model of DMD and are widely used for preclinical drug testing. Both DMD and mdx muscle undergo cycles of degeneration and regeneration, resulting in a chronic inflammatory state in skeletal muscle. Together, a clearly defined genetic cause and animal models establish a logical path for developing therapies for DMD through translational medicine. Several such compounds have now begun to enter clinical trials, including drug classes that target either the skipping of problematic exons [1]–[3] or inflammation and membrane stability [4].
Two significant problems encountered thus far in the case of DMD and related translational areas are a lack of quantitative surrogate outcome measures [5] and a poor success rate in translating success in preclinical mouse trials into success in human clinical trials [6]–[8]. Currently, many outcome measures used in early DMD trials consist of measures that can be subjective, could be susceptible to coaching effects or placebo effects, or show high variability [5], [9]. In preclinical mdx studies, most outcome measures used are unique to mice or must be substantially altered or interpreted to account for species differences.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for imaging damage to soft-tissue such as muscle. MRI is a non-invasive technique that does not require anesthesia in humans. It provides advantages over microCT, X-ray, and ultrasound imaging techniques in that it does not use ionizing radiation, and provides high-resolution imaging with strong contrast in soft tissues [10], [11]. Early MRI and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy studies have shown clear differences between DMD and healthy muscle. Adipose tissue replacement of muscle is prominent in standard T2-weighted MRI imaging of advanced-stage DMD patients [12], [13]. Fat-suppression MRI techniques allow for enhanced imaging of edema and inflammation [12]. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques show that DMD muscle is in a state of energy deficiency [14], and detect increased lipid content within muscle [15]. Given these studies establishing dystrophic muscle phenotypes, together with studies comparing clinical groups [16], changes over time [17], and correlation with clinical assessments [18], [19], MRI is emerging as a potential key surrogate outcome measure for DMD clinical trials.
Here, we use MRI methodologies to study muscle damage and changes over time in mdx mice. One characteristic of the mdx disease is the period of peak necrosis and disease severity from 3 to 6 weeks of age; this severe disease is followed by a recovery period that produces mild phenotypes in the mice by 10–12 weeks of age [20]–[23]. We use a longitudinal strategy in which we image the same mice and muscles repeatedly from 6 to 12 weeks of age. This approach has several advantages: it examines two distinct disease phases, longitudinal measures increase statistical power, it facilitates design of non-invasive studies with technologies that are translatable to human muscle, and by assaying natural recovery periods it provides an idea of what therapeutic efficacy could look like. Here, we show clear MRI and NMR spectroscopy phenotypes in 6-week mdx mice in comparison to wild-type. These phenotypes include measures of muscle damage and a deficiency in energy metabolites. Interestingly, many of these differences are eliminated or reduced as mdx mice transition into the recovery phase of disease. Taken together, our results support the non-invasive use of MRI surrogate outcome measures for diagnosis, prognosis, and rehabilitation of muscle damage in muscular dystrophy.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All animal work was conducted according to relevant national and international guidelines. All studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Children's National Medical Center, the Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and by the Howard University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Animal care
All experiments were conducted according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Children's National Medical Center, the Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Howard University. Animals were maintained in a controlled mouse facility with a 12 h light: 12 h dark photoperiod, fed ad libitum, and monitored daily for health. All mdx (C57BL/10ScSn-DMD<mdx>/J) and wild-type (C57BL/10ScSnJ) female mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Groups for the longitudinal study initially consisted of six wild-type and six mdx mice each. One wild-type mouse stopped breathing under anesthesia and was removed from the study. Mice were received at 4 weeks of age, allowed to acclimate for 2 weeks, and assayed beginning at 6 weeks of age. MRI and NMR spectroscopy were performed on each mouse every 2 weeks until the mice were 12 weeks of age. To immobilize the animals for MRI and NMR spectroscopy scans, they were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane, gently restrained in imaging position upon a plastic plate, and positioned in the center of the MRI scanner. For imaging, mice were placed in a holder that maintained their temperature at 37°C, with monitoring of their body temperature as well as respiratory and heart rates. Hindlimb muscles were examined in two sites per animal, including the leg and the thigh.
MRI and NMR spectroscopy
In vivo monitoring of mouse hindlimbs and muscle damage was performed using a 9.4 T, 89-mm vertical bore NMR spectrometer (Bruker Biospin MRI, Billerica, MA) with a 25-mm inner diameter dual nucleus (31P/1H) birdcage coil. For anatomical positioning, a pilot image set of three orthogonal imaging planes were used. MRI pulse sequences used for data acquisition used T2-weighted imaging (T2) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS) sequences optimized for imaging of muscle inflammation. The imaging sequence used was a rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) sequence: echo time (TE) = 7.4 ms; repetition time (TR) = 3,000 ms; RARE factor 16; flip angle α = 90°; field of view = 2.56 cm×2.56 cm; slice thickness = 1 mm with no gap between slices; matrix size = 256×256; number of averages = 12.
Spectra were processed using TopSpin v1.5 software (Bruker Biospin MRI, Billerica, MA). For 31P spectroscopy studies, un-localized single-pulse spectroscopy was performed with 4k transients and a band width of 50 ppm. Integral areas of spectral peaks corresponding to inorganic phosphorous (Pi), phosphocreatine (PCr), and the three phosphate groups of adenosine triphosphate (α-ATP, β-ATP, and γ-ATP) were measured. Pi peaks were not detectable in several of the mice assayed (3 mdx and 5 wild-type); for these mice Pi values were uniformly omitted from the analyses. The presence of phosphomonoester (PME) or phosphodiester (PDE) peaks was also recorded; however, the signal-to-noise ratio of these peaks was not always adequate for accurate quantification. Levels of PCr and Pi were normalized by dividing by either the total ATP present in that spectrum or by the amount of β-ATP present in that spectrum. The results were consistent between both of these normalization methods; data are presented as the ratio of each parameter to total ATP.
For analysis of MRI images, two-dimensional sequential (2dseq) files were converted to digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) files and analyzed using ImageJ v1.48 (NIH) software. To obtain volumetric data and account for possible variability between individual MRI slices, multiple consecutive MRI slices of each leg and thigh were assembled into image stacks encompassing 5- or 3-mm sections of the mouse hindlimb. Each stack was analyzed individually, and values for the two legs or thighs of each mouse were then averaged to obtain a single value for that mouse. For the leg, five consecutive slices along the long axis of the tibia were assayed, beginning 2 mm distal from the tibial plateau as a reference point to ensure mice were assayed at the same anatomical location. For the thigh, three consecutive slices along the long axis of the femur were assayed, beginning 6 mm proximal from the femoral condyles. Within each slice, regions of interest were digitally traced in ImageJ for each leg such that they were defined as the total area internal to the leg or thigh. Within regions of interest in each individual MRI image, we measured the total cross-sectional area, as well as the volumetric area (in voxels, or volume pixels) of bone, of muscle (with bone subtracted), and of tissue exceeding threshold signal intensity. For cross-sectional area, the highest value for each leg or thigh was recorded as the maximal cross-sectional area (CSAmax). Bone was measured by digitally tracing the dark outline shape of the tibia or femur in MRI images, and measuring the area outlined. Muscle area was measured by subtracting bone from the combined muscle and bone area making up the full region of interest. Elevated signal intensity was measured using ImageJ software in a semi-automated manner by measuring the volumetric area in voxels that exceeded background threshold within the regions of interest. Percent of tissue with elevated signal intensity was calculated by dividing this measurement by the area in voxels measured for muscle.
Histology
Mice were assayed by T2 imaging of the leg as described above. Immediately after each imaging session, the imaged mouse was sacrificed and the whole leg fixed in formalin. This was performed with 3 mdx and 2 wild-type mice at 6 months of age. Paraffin cross-sections of the legs were made at locations of interest corresponding to MRI slices as specified in a sagittal positioning image (Histoserv, Inc.), and sections were stained with H&E. Images were obtained using an Olympus BX61TRF (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) microscope with an Olympus DP71 camera and Olympus DP Controller v3.2.1.276 software. Using ImageJ software, digital tracing and overlap of the tibia structure between H&E and MRI images was used to confirm anatomical location within a corresponding MRI slice. T2 images for specific slices were then compared to corresponding H&E images for qualitative analysis within regions of interest. Multiple images taken with a 4× objective were used to produce full cross-sectional H&E montage images of the leg, and an inset image within a representative area was taken with a 10× objective. Histopathology was assayed qualitatively as reported previously [24].
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed by a dedicated biostatistician. Separate regression models were run for each measurement, method, and site. All models were mixed effects linear regression models with the mouse ID as the random coefficient. This approach allowed us to take into account the repeated measures taken at each time point. The main effects of strain and time were tested. All within-strain measurements were approximately normally distributed; therefore, no normalizing transformations were used. All single time-point strain comparisons were done using t-tests without adjustment for multiple testing to facilitate the powered design of trials with single time points. Sample size calculations were performed to determine the number of mice needed to detect a significant change with treatment, to facilitate future preclinical and proof-of-concept studies. Calculations were performed on mdx mice only, with the expectation that WT mice would not show the level of changes in inflammation and muscle changes expected in mdx mice. For PCr, the percent of voxels with elevated signal, maximum CSA, and volume of tissue with elevated intensity, we performed calculations to show a 20% change in mean value. Power analyses were one-sided in the direction of mdx value movement toward wild-type values and assumed a power of 80% and an alpha = 0.05. Throughout the text, all data are presented as means ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted.
Results
NMR spectroscopy shows mdx energetics deficit
To determine the state of energy metabolites in mdx versus healthy mice, we assayed the relative levels of phosphate metabolites in mice using un-localized 31P spectroscopy. Here, the levels of phosphocreatine (PCr), inorganic phosphate (Pi), and adenosine triphosphate (ATP, with α-, β- and γ- peaks corresponding to its three phosphate groups) were assayed every 2 weeks beginning at 6 weeks of age (Figure 1A). At 6 weeks of age, PCr levels were significantly lower in mdx than in wild-type mice, with PCr:ATP ratios of 0.44±0.05 and 0.58±0.03 (p≤0.001), respectively (Figure 1B). The difference in PCr levels between mdx and wild-type mice was reduced by 8 weeks of age, as the mdx mice entered the recovery stage of their disease, with mdx levels resembling wild-type and no significant difference present from 8 weeks to 12 weeks of age. In contrast to PCr, the levels of Pi:ATP were significantly increased (p<0.05) in mdx mice compared to wild-type at both 6 weeks and 8 weeks of age, after which they resembled wild-type (Figure 1C). These findings indicate that at 6 weeks of age, during the peak stage of mdx weakness and necrosis [20], [22], [23], the mdx mice experience an energy metabolism deficiency that subsequently improves during the recovery phase.
Longitudinal MRI of mdx muscle detects effects of mdx genotype and age
To image dystrophic muscle in live mice during the peak necrosis and recovery phases of the mdx condition, we performed T2-weighted imaging and fat-suppressed imaging of leg and thigh muscles every 2 weeks, from 6 to 12 weeks of age. Heterogeneous areas of elevated intensity were visible in all mdx mice and at all time points, in contrast to the more uniform and dark signal for healthy control muscle tissue (Figure 2A). Orientation and relevant anatomy are provided (Figure 2B). By aligning anatomically matched MRI slices using the tibial plateau as a reference point across successive time points, we observed qualitative changes in the sites and patterns of hyperintense foci within mdx leg muscles between two-week intervals.
Quantitatively, we detected significant effects of the mdx genotype on measures of muscle damage and size by both T2-weighted and fat-suppressed imaging, in both the leg and thigh muscles. No significant differences were observed in volumetric bone area between mdx and wild-type, for either the tibia or femur, for any of the imaging methods (Figure S1). In T2 imaging of mdx leg muscles, we found a significant increase in the percentage of tissue with elevated intensity (p<0.001) that changed over time (p<0.01), without a significant interaction effect being present. In T2 images of leg muscle, 6-week-old mdx mice had 21±3% tissue with elevated signal, as compared to 4±2% for wild-type mice (p<0.001; Figure 2C). As the mdx mice entered the recovery phase of disease, they showed a 38% reduction in the levels of affected tissue, to a mean of 13±2% of volume pixels (voxels) with elevated intensity at 8 weeks of age (p<0.001). These values then remained fairly steady, with no significant decrease from 8 to 12 weeks of age. These data illustrate the ability of MRI to detect significant levels of affected tissue in dystrophic legs in 6- to 12-week old mdx mice.
We also wanted to gain insight into whether affected muscle in mdx is either being eliminated or being “diluted” as the muscle grows larger and enters the recovery phase. To do this, we assayed the absolute volume of tissue with elevated intensity in the legs as well as the cross-sectional area of the legs. We detected a significant effect of the mdx genotype (p<0.001), with increased volume of elevated signal over wild-type at all ages (Figure 2D). We detected no significant effects of time on the volume of elevated signal in mdx mice and no significant interaction effect. Examining the sizes of muscles throughout the 6- to 12-week period assayed, we detected significant effects of the mdx genotype (p<0.001) and of time (p<0.001) on CSAmax, without a significant interaction effect. Initially, the mdx mice showed a smaller but significant increase over wild-type in CSAmax (p<0.05), with values of 27.7±1.3 mm2 versus 24.7±2.6 mm2, respectively (Figure 2E). In contrast to the results for elevated signal, as the mdx mice progressed into the recovery phase, differences in CSAmax between the mdx and wild-type mice became larger, with the difference increasing by 113% from week 6 to week 8. At 8 weeks, mdx calves had CSAmax values of 34.7±2.2 mm2, versus 28.4±2.5 mm2 for wild-type (p<0.01), and this difference was maintained through 12 weeks of age, at which point the mdx mice had CSAmax values of 40.0±3.9 mm2, versus 33.5±1.3 mm2 for wild-type (p<0.01). Together, these MRI data show that as mdx mice recover from the necrotic phase and assume a milder phenotype [20], [22], [23], they show a decrease in the percentage of affected tissue driven by an increase in muscle size, without a complete resolution of phenotype.
To enhance the visualization of signal from possible edema and inflammation, given the reduced signal likely from possible fatty infiltration of the muscle, we performed fat-suppressed imaging immediately following the standard T2-weighted imaging (Figure 3). Here again, we saw significant phenotypes in 6-week old mdx mice, with an average of 9±3% tissue with elevated intensity present in mdx mice, versus 1±1% for wild-type mice (p<0.001). Following week 6, mdx mice again showed a 40% reduction in affected leg tissue as they entered the recovery phase of disease, to 5±4% versus 0.6±0.3% for wild-type (p<0.05) at 8 weeks. Values for both genotypes were then maintained at similar levels through 12 weeks of age. These data are consistent with the T2 imaging results.
For the thigh muscles, results were qualitatively consistent with those found for the leg muscles; we again observed changes in the patterns of affected tissue over time within the same mouse in anatomically aligned MRI slices (Figure 4A). Orientation and relevant anatomy are provided (Figure 4B). In standard T2 images, 6-week old mdx mice showed a significant increase in the percentage of tissue with elevated signal, with values of 22±5% versus 7±1% for wild-type mice (p<0.001; Figure 4C). This parameter decreased steadily over time for the mdx thigh, to 14±5% for mdx and 5±1% for wild-type mice at 12 weeks (p<0.01). Examining the absolute volume of tissue with increased signal independent of muscle size, we found a significant effect of the mdx genotype at all time points (p<0.01), but no significant effect of time over the ages assayed (Figure 4D). The size of the thigh muscle, as measured by CSAmax, was not significantly different between genotypes at 6 weeks of age (Figure 4E). However, as with the leg, CSAmax increased for the mdx thighs when compared to wild-type, beginning at 8 weeks of age with values of 57.9±2.4 mm2 for mdx versus 49.3±6.4 mm2 for wild-type (p<0.05). This size differential continued to increase through 12 weeks, to 73.0±7.5 mm2 for mdx versus 57.0±3.2 mm2 for wild-type mice (p<0.01).
In fat-suppressed imaging of the thigh, mdx mice again showed a significant increase in the percentage of tissue with elevated signal at 6 weeks, with 17±6% as compared to 2±1% for wild-type (p<0.001; Figure 5). By 10 weeks of age, this decreased to 9±1% for mdx and 2±1% for wild-type (p<0.001) as the mice progressed to the recovery stage of disease. Together, thigh data are in agreement with the leg. These data illustrate that mdx mice show a substantial decrease in the percentage of affected tissue and an increase in muscle area as they progress from the peak disease phases [20], [22], [23] to the recovery phase of the disease.
Histopathology present in affected areas of dystrophic mdx leg MRI
To determine pathology present within areas of elevated intensity in MRI of mdx hindlimb muscles, we performed an additional experiment comparing H&E histology to matched MRI slices (Figure 6). Here, T2 images of the leg were obtained in 6-month old mdx and wild-type mice, with legs collected for histology immediately following MRI. Consistent with younger mice, mdx mice but not wild-type mice displayed heterogeneous patterns with foci of elevated signal intensity in their leg muscles (Figure 6A–B). By comparing matched H&E stained sections to MRI slices, we found areas of increased MRI intensity in dystrophic muscle correspond to histology regions containing a mix of inflammation, degenerating fibers, regenerating fibers, and hypertrophic fibers (Figure 6C–D). Inflammation and myofiber degeneration or regeneration were not observed in either of the wild-type controls. Results were consistent between individual mice with the same genotype. These data indicate areas of elevated intensity in dystrophic mdx muscle correspond to dystrophic lesions that include a combination of inflammation with degenerating and regenerating myofibers.
Statistical power calculations suggest assays to use for lowest sample size
To determine the methodology that may be of best utility in preclinical drug or intervention efficacy studies, we performed statistical sample size calculations on MRI and spectroscopy data. Here, we calculated the sample sizes of mdx mice needed to detect 20% changes in mdx metabolite or imaging measures; in previous studies, we detect up to 40% to 50% effects from drug treatment on measures of muscle pathology and inflammation in similar aged mdx mice [4]. Our statistical power analyses indicated that 31P NMR spectroscopy performed along with T2 imaging of leg muscles at 6 weeks of age requires the lowest number of mdx mice to detect drug efficacy. At 6 weeks of age significant phenotypes are presented, and 20% intervention effects can be detected with 4 mdx mice for 31P phosphocreatine levels, and with 7 or 8 mice for T2 quantification of affected tissue in leg muscle (Table 1). In contrast to the leg, T2 measurements in 6-week-old mdx thighs required 13 or more mice for detection of drug effects. Using fat suppression acquisition methods increased the number of 6-week old mice needed for detection of intervention effects to 39 or more mice for both muscle groups. As mdx mice grew older, the number of mice needed to detect intervention effects in T2 images also increased to 22 or more at week 12, while 31P phenotypes were absent (Table S1). Together, these data indicate that a protocol of leg T2 MRI combined with 31P spectroscopy in mice that are 6 weeks of age provides several sensitive outcome measures for mdx studies.
Table 1. Statistical sample size calculations to detect intervention effects in mdx mice.
Values at 6 weeks of age | |||||
Method | Measure | Site | WT mean ±SD | mdx mean ±SD | N per group to detect a 20% change in mdx |
31P NMR Spec | PCr: tATP | 0.585±0.030 | 0.438±0.047 | 4 | |
T2 | % elevated signal | Leg | 4±2 | 21±3 | 8 |
Vol. elevated (mm3) | Leg | 4.16±1.36 | 22.91±3.31 | 7 | |
% elevated signal | Thigh | 7±1 | 22±5 | 13 | |
Vol. elevated (mm3) | Thigh | 7.52±0.75 | 30.89±7.33 | 18 | |
Fat Suppression | % elevated signal | Leg | 1±1 | 9±3 | 41 |
Vol. elevated (mm3) | Leg | 0.70±0.49 | 10.00±3.55 | 39 | |
% elevated signal | Thigh | 1±1 | 17±6 | 39 | |
Vol. elevated (mm3) | Thigh | 1.69±0.73 | 23.34±9.04 | 58 |
Abbreviations: NMR Spec, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy; PCr, phosphocreatine; tATP, total adenosine triphosphate; Vol., Volume; WT, wild-type.
Discussion
MRI shows promise as a surrogate outcome measure for DMD that is capable of non-invasively detecting muscle damage in patients. Here we use magnetic resonance technologies to identify and longitudinally characterize phenotypes in the mdx model of DMD. Since mdx mice naturally show a peak of necrosis, weakness and disease at 3 to 6 weeks of age [20]–[23], followed by a natural recovery phase in which they show only mild skeletal muscle disease, the peak disease phase is commonly used to assess preclinical efficacy of therapeutics [4], [25]. We find mdx mice show significant imaging and spectroscopic alterations during this peak disease phase. Furthermore, these changes decrease as mice progress to the recovery phase. Our findings indicate non-invasive MRI and NMR spectroscopy are sensitive outcome measures that can be used to study disease and evaluate potential therapies in the mdx model of muscular dystrophy.
Energy metabolites detected using 31P spectroscopy show a significant deficit of phosphocreatine in 6- to 8-week old mdx mice. Significant deficits in phosphocreatine and increased inorganic phosphate are also found in DMD patients [14]. Since energy for muscle contractions comes from phosphocreatine, which is used for generation of ATP through a reversible reaction with creatine phosphokinase, the PCr:ATP ratio is reflective of the energy state of muscle [26]–[28]. Thus, the decrease in PCr:ATP reflects a muscle bioenergetics deficit in both dystrophic 3- to 12-year-old DMD patients [14] and 6-week-old mdx mice. Similar results have been found in ex vivo cardiac studies of mdx mice, where a decrease in PCr is found in association with a decrease in mitochondrial content of heart tissue [29]. Consistent with heart muscle, we and others find significant mitochondrial deficits in mdx skeletal muscle [30]. Other muscle disorders such as mitochondrial myopathies and polio paralysis show a deficit in phosphocreatine levels as well [31], [32]. Interestingly, we find the PCr:ATP ratio in mdx increases to a level not significantly different from wild-type by 8 to 10 weeks of age. This illustrates an improvement in energetics of dystrophic mdx skeletal muscle during the period associated with recovery.
MRI of mdx muscle provides significant phenotypes at all ages examined, characterized by hyper-intense foci and a more heterogeneous appearance. Histology shows these imaging phenotypes correspond to dystrophic lesions containing a mix of inflammation with degenerating, regenerating, and hypertrophic myofibers. This is consistent with Walter et al, who find hyperintense regions are consistent with dystrophic lesions and damaged myofibers enhanced by contrast agents, and who use 1H spectroscopy in mdx to show minimal fatty infiltration in comparison to DMD [33]. We see foci of hyper-intense signal change over time, consistent with a dynamic disease process [20] and with time frames established for muscle repair following crush injury [34]. We find cross-sectional area of mdx muscle increases over time, while absolute volume of dystrophic lesions in imaging does not. Data in the literature indicate such increases in CSAmax are the result of hypertrophy and regeneration [23], [35]–[37].
Comparing spectroscopy and imaging results, there is a discrepancy in mdx mice. Spectroscopy shows an initial energetics deficit that is eliminated by 8–10 weeks, while imaging phenotypes improve but persist at all ages examined (including 6 months). Established muscle histology and function data may provide insight into these differences. Through matched histology, we find mdx imaging phenotypes are consistent with sites containing inflammation along with myofiber degeneration and regeneration. Previous studies establish this histopathology peaks at 3–6 weeks, then improves but persists throughout the mdx lifespan [20]–[23]. In a longitudinal study we are unable to assay isolated muscles for function, but isometric force data in the literature establish muscle function at stages we examined. Throughout the lifespan of their disease, mdx muscles show deficits in normalized strength, where force is measured relative to mass (kN/kg) or cross-sectional area (kN/m2) [4], [23], [25], [37], [38]. However, raw absolute force measurements (expressed in kN or mN) behave differently. During peak mdx disease (within ages 3–7 weeks), mdx muscles show deficits in absolute tetanic forces for extensor digitorum longus (EDL) [23], soleus [23], tibialis anterior (TA) [21], and diaphragm [39]. As mdx enter a recovery phase (approximately 2–8 months of age) strength deficits improve [20] and raw measures of isolated EDL [23], [37], soleus [37], and TA [38] muscle forces are usually at or above wild-type levels. Comparing these observations and stages, it may be possible that energetics deficits play a role in decreased raw isometric forces during peak mdx disease. Consistent with this, creatine treatment targeting energetics deficits in DMD is found to both increase phosphocreatine and preserve muscle function over placebo in a short term study [14]. Alternatively, there may be a threshold of inflammation and muscle damage that manifests as metabolite or force deficits, and mice may cross this during recovery. More investigations will be needed to clarify the relationship of energetics, histopathology, and strength in mdx muscle.
Though some measures are consistent between mdx and DMD, their disease courses have clear differences. A main difference is that DMD is progressive. As children age they show increasing weakness, fibrosis, and infiltration of muscle with fatty tissue. MRI and NMR studies of DMD (summarized in Table 2) show striking differences from controls as fatty adipose tissue replaces muscle [13], [15], [40], [41]. In DMD, edema is observed within damaged muscle [12]. At advanced ages, mdx disease does eventually progress, with injury phenotypes becoming more pronounced after 8 months [38], cardiac deficits around 9 months [42], [43], and advanced histopathology with susceptibility to rhabdomyosarcoma around 2 years [44]. However, mdx typically do not progress to a point with the degree of muscle wasting and fatty infiltration apparent in DMD. The mdx stages we examine here may be most consistent with early DMD, where muscle shows weakness, pathology and inflammation, but patients do not yet exhibit extensive replacement of muscle with fibrotic and fatty tissue. Moving forward, many gene therapy, antisense oligos, and next-generation drug strategies will indeed want to target early DMD stages to prevent muscle loss and to target stages with more myofibers present.
Table 2. MR imaging and spectroscopy phenotypes in dystrophinopathies.
Reference | Study Description | Assay | Study population | Findings in dystrophy | Our findings in mdx |
Banerjee [57] | DMD vs. controls; effects of creatine | 31P NMR Spectroscopy | DMD; 27 patients, 8 controls | PCr is lower & Pi is higher in DMD | PCr is lower and Pi higher in 6 week mdx |
Forbes [58] | Ambulant DMD vs. controls | T2 MR Imaging | DMD; 30 patients, 10 controls | CSAmax higher in DMD (MG, Sol, ST) | CSAmax up for mdx in all weeks (leg & thigh) |
Kinali [13] | Leg muscle of DMD | T2 MR Imaging | DMD; 34 patients | Non-muscle content and fat higher in DMD | Non-muscle higher in mdx muscle in all weeks |
Newman [15] | Forearms of DMD vs. controls | 1H NMR Spectroscopy | DMD; 6 patients aged 9–15 years | Fat content higher in DMD | No fatty infiltration visible in mdx |
Kim [12] | T1 and FS imaging of DMD pelvic muscles | Fat-Suppressed T2 Imaging | DMD; 42 patients | DMD Edema; GMa, VL, GMe most frequent | Inflammation and muscle damage present in mdx |
Dunn [53] | Quantitative MRI of mdx vs. WT | T2 Mapping | mdx; 32–48 weeks | T2 decrease, 1H density & water increase | Inflammation and muscle damage present in mdx |
Zhang [29] | Cardiac function and metabolism in mdx | MRI & ex vivo 31P NMR Spec | mdx and WT; 32 weeks | Decreased PCr in heart; RV & LV defects | Decreased PCr in skeletal muscle |
McIntosh [34] | Crush injury and mdx vs. controls | T2 images | mdx; 8–10 weeks | Dystrophic foci seen; muscle changes over 21 days post-injury | Changes in natural mdx lesions between 2 to 4 week intervals |
Stuckey [45] | Cardiac morphology and function in mdx vs. controls | Longitudinal cardiac & Gd MRI | mdx; 4–52 weeks | RV Dysfunction by 1 & LV by 12 months; fibrosis by 6 months | Heart fibrosis after 6 months; 8 weeks if dosed with prednisone[4] |
Pratt [55] | Case study of a single mdx leg | MRI | One single mdx mouse; 5–80 weeks | Peak in MRI hetero-geneity, recovery after 13 weeks | Peak phenotypes in necrotic phase, damage persists at 8–12 weeks |
Straub [46] | Agent-enhanced MRI of mdx and Sgca−/− mice | MS-325 agent MRI | mdx & Sgca−/−; 8–10 weeks | Enhances dystrophic muscle contrast | |
Amthor [47] | Albumin targeting of dystrophic muscle | Gd enhanced MRI | mdx; 11–13 weeks | HSA targets to dystrophic muscle | |
Odintsov [48] | MRI detection of transplanted stem cells | MRI of labeled stem cells | mdx and dKO; 5–30 weeks | MRI tracks Fe-labeled stem cells short-term | |
Martins-Bach [51] | Metabolic profiling of mdx muscle | In vitro 1H NMR Spec | Lysates of mdx muscle; 12–24 weeks | Identified metabolites altered in mdx lysates | |
Xu [52] | Metabolic changes in muscle after injury | 1H NMR Spec | Injured WT & mdx TAs; 8 weeks | Intramuscular lipids increase post injury | Energetics deficit in necrotic phase |
Mathur [54] | Effects of exercise on T2 values in muscle | T2 Mapping | mdx and WT; 20–60 weeks | T2, affected area up in mdx & after running | Affected area increased in necrotic phase |
Walter [33] | Gene therapy effects on dystrophic muscle | T2 Mapping | mdx & γsg−/−mice; 1 year post-therapy | MRI tracks gene therapy efficacy in mdx | 6 week mdx leg provides best stat power |
Abbreviations: CSAmax, maximum cross-sectional area; FS, fat suppressed T2; Gd, gadolinium; GMa, gluteus maximus; GMed, gluteus medius; HSA, human serum albumin; MR, Magnetic Resonance; MG, medial gastrocnemius; PCr, phosphocreatine; RV, right ventricular; Sg, Sarcoglycan; Sgca, Sarcoglycan alpha; Sol, soleus; ST, semitendinosus; tATP, total adenosine triphosphate; VL, vastus lateralis; WT, wild-type.
Our power analyses and time course show the period of peak mdx disease provides a useful window with more severe phenotypes, 31P energetics phenotypes, and increased statistical power for detecting intervention effects. Here we calculate sample sizes needed to detect 20% intervention effects. In our experience with prednisone and with VBP15, we observe substantially larger than 20% intervention effects at these ages in mdx mice [4]. For example, fluorescent live-imaging shows a 52% decrease in markers of necrosis, and histology a 38% decrease in inflammatory foci with drug treatment [4]. Over the course of only a few weeks, we see elimination of 31P spectroscopy phenotypes and a dramatic reduction in the percentage of muscle affected. These findings will be valuable for design of imaging and pre-clinical therapeutic studies, by providing more phenotypes and larger differences from baseline health in controls.
Other imaging studies provide insight into mdx physiology (summarized in Table 2), but most avoid the critical necrotic phase of the mdx disease course. Cardiac MRI shows mdx mice can exhibit heart dysfunction by one month [45], and decreased cardiac phosphocreatine content at 8 months [29]. Agents can help visualize disrupted muscle integrity [46], [47] or detect transplanted stem cells [48]–[50]. Metabolic profiling shows alterations in injured muscle and lysates of 3- to 6-month old mdx mice [51], [52]. T2 mapping has been performed in 20- to 60-week-old mdx [53], [54]. One case study reports a single mdx leg assayed longitudinally to 80 weeks [55]. Dunn et al. initially showed dystrophic lesions can be detected via MRI and that crush injuries are repaired over approximately 3 weeks [53], consistent with our findings for naturally occurring mdx dystrophic lesions. Mathur and Vohra et al. characterized effects of exercise on mdx, finding effects of the mdx genotype and of running on muscle T2 and % affected area, with medial muscles particularly affected by running [54]. Gene correction in mdx and limb girdle muscular dystrophy mouse models show MRI can be used to detect therapeutic improvement in muscular dystrophy [33], [56].
The mdx mouse provides researchers with a genetic model of the cause of DMD (dystrophin deficiency), and MRI is emerging as an important surrogate outcome measure for muscle damage. In the present study we have found NMR phenotypes and provide new information on the dynamic disease process in mdx mice. Although mdx is typically regarded as a very mild disease model, we find 31P spectroscopy and T2 imaging of the 6-week old mdx leg show significant differences from WT mice and could provide robust outcome measures, even with relatively few animals. These findings can improve preclinical trial design by reducing the number of animals required to detect effects, allowing for longitudinal non-invasive quantification of muscle disease, and using measures that are translatable to human clinical studies.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Debbie McClellan for assistance with this manuscript.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
CRH is supported by the National Institutes of Health's (http://www.nih.gov/) 5T32AR056993 and 5R24HD050846-02 grants. PW and this work were supported in part by the National Institutes of Health's G12MD007597 and United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (http://mrmc.amedd.army.mil/) W81XWH 10-1-0767 grants. KN is supported by National Institutes of Health's K26OD011171 and P50AR060836 grants, a Muscular Dystrophy Association (http://mda.org/) translational grant 30000783/4736, and the United States Department of Defense (http://www.defense.gov/) grants W81XWH-05-1-0659, W81XWH-11-1-0782, W81XWH-11-1-0330, and W81XWH-11-1-0782. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Alter J, Lou F, Rabinowitz A, Yin H, Rosenfeld J, et al. (2006) Systemic delivery of morpholino oligonucleotide restores dystrophin expression bodywide and improves dystrophic pathology. Nat Med 12: 175–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yokota T, Lu QL, Partridge T, Kobayashi M, Nakamura A, et al. (2009) Efficacy of systemic morpholino exon-skipping in Duchenne dystrophy dogs. Ann Neurol 65: 667–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mendell JR, Rodino-Klapac LR, Sahenk Z, Roush K, Bird L, et al. (2013) Eteplirsen for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol 74: 637–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Heier CR, Damsker JM, Yu Q, Dillingham BC, Huynh T, et al. (2013) VBP15, a novel anti-inflammatory and membrane-stabilizer, improves muscular dystrophy without side effects. EMBO Mol Med 5: 1569–1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hoffman EP, McNally EM (2014) Exon-skipping therapy: a roadblock, detour, or bump in the road? Sci Transl Med 6: 230fs214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K (2011) Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10: 712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Perrin S (2014) Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work. Nature 507: 423–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Scott S, Kranz JE, Cole J, Lincecum JM, Thompson K, et al. (2008) Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 9: 4–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lu QL, Cirak S, Partridge T (2014) What Can We Learn From Clinical Trials of Exon Skipping for DMD? Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 3: e152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Huang Y, Majumdar S, Genant HK, Chan WP, Sharma KR, et al. (1994) Quantitative MR relaxometry study of muscle composition and function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Magn Reson Imaging 4: 59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mercuri E, Pichiecchio A, Allsop J, Messina S, Pane M, et al. (2007) Muscle MRI in inherited neuromuscular disorders: past, present, and future. J Magn Reson Imaging 25: 433–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kim HK, Merrow AC, Shiraj S, Wong BL, Horn PS, et al. (2013) Analysis of fatty infiltration and inflammation of the pelvic and thigh muscles in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD): grading of disease involvement on MR imaging and correlation with clinical assessments. Pediatr Radiol 43: 1327–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kinali M, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Cirak S, Glover A, Guglieri M, et al. (2011) Muscle histology vs MRI in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology 76: 346–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Banerjee B, Sharma U, Balasubramanian K, Kalaivani M, Kalra V, et al. (2010) Effect of creatine monohydrate in improving cellular energetics and muscle strength in ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled 31P MRS study. Magn Reson Imaging 28: 698–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Newman RJ, Bore PJ, Chan L, Gadian DG, Styles P, et al. (1982) Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of forearm muscle in Duchenne dystrophy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284: 1072–1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Forbes SC, Walter GA, Rooney WD, Wang DJ, DeVos S, et al. (2013) Skeletal muscles of ambulant children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: validation of multicenter study of evaluation with MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology 269: 198–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Willcocks RJ, Arpan IA, Forbes SC, Lott DJ, Senesac CR, et al. (2014) Longitudinal measurements of MRI-T2 in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: effects of age and disease progression. Neuromuscul Disord 24: 393–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kim HK, Laor T, Horn PS, Racadio JM, Wong B, et al. (2010) T2 mapping in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: distribution of disease activity and correlation with clinical assessments. Radiology 255: 899–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Arpan I, Forbes SC, Lott DJ, Senesac CR, Daniels MJ, et al. (2013) T(2) mapping provides multiple approaches for the characterization of muscle involvement in neuromuscular diseases: a cross-sectional study of lower leg muscles in 5-15-year-old boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. NMR Biomed 26: 320–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Muntoni F, Mateddu A, Marchei F, Clerk A, Serra G (1993) Muscular weakness in the mdx mouse. J Neurol Sci 120: 71–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dangain J, Vrbova G (1984) Muscle development in mdx mutant mice. Muscle Nerve 7: 700–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tanabe Y, Esaki K, Nomura T (1986) Skeletal muscle pathology in X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) mouse. Acta Neuropathol 69: 91–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Anderson JE, Bressler BH, Ovalle WK (1988) Functional regeneration in the hindlimb skeletal muscle of the mdx mouse. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 9: 499–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Spurney CF, Gordish-Dressman H, Guerron AD, Sali A, Pandey GS, et al. (2009) Preclinical drug trials in the mdx mouse: assessment of reliable and sensitive outcome measures. Muscle Nerve 39: 591–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Huynh T, Uaesoontrachoon K, Quinn JL, Tatem KS, Heier CR, et al. (2013) Selective modulation through the glucocorticoid receptor ameliorates muscle pathology in mdx mice. J Pathol 231: 223–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kushmerick MJ (1985) Patterns in mammalian muscle energetics. J Exp Biol 115: 165–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kushmerick MJ (1987) Energetics studies of muscles of different types. Basic Res Cardiol 82 Suppl 2: 17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kushmerick MJ (1995) Skeletal muscle: a paradigm for testing principles of bioenergetics. J Bioenerg Biomembr 27: 555–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang W, ten Hove M, Schneider JE, Stuckey DJ, Sebag-Montefiore L, et al. (2008) Abnormal cardiac morphology, function and energy metabolism in the dystrophic mdx mouse: an MRI and MRS study. J Mol Cell Cardiol 45: 754–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jahnke VE, Van Der Meulen JH, Johnston HK, Ghimbovschi S, Partridge T, et al. (2012) Metabolic remodeling agents show beneficial effects in the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse model. Skelet Muscle 2: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sharma U, Kumar V, Wadhwa S, Jagannathan NR (2007) In vivo (31)P MRS study of skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with postpolio residual paralysis. Magn Reson Imaging 25: 244–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Taylor DJ, Kemp GJ, Radda GK (1994) Bioenergetics of skeletal muscle in mitochondrial myopathy. J Neurol Sci 127: 198–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Walter G, Cordier L, Bloy D, Sweeney HL (2005) Noninvasive monitoring of gene correction in dystrophic muscle. Magn Reson Med 54: 1369–1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. McIntosh LM, Baker RE, Anderson JE (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of regenerating and dystrophic mouse muscle. Biochem Cell Biol 76: 532–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Coulton GR, Curtin NA, Morgan JE, Partridge TA (1988) The mdx mouse skeletal muscle myopathy: II. Contractile properties. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 14: 299–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Coulton GR, Morgan JE, Partridge TA, Sloper JC (1988) The mdx mouse skeletal muscle myopathy: I. A histological, morphometric and biochemical investigation. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 14: 53–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lynch GS, Hinkle RT, Chamberlain JS, Brooks SV, Faulkner JA (2001) Force and power output of fast and slow skeletal muscles from mdx mice 6-28 months old. J Physiol 535: 591–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dellorusso C, Crawford RW, Chamberlain JS, Brooks SV (2001) Tibialis anterior muscles in mdx mice are highly susceptible to contraction-induced injury. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 22: 467–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kumar A, Bhatnagar S, Kumar A (2010) Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat alleviates pathology and improves skeletal muscle function in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Am J Pathol 177: 248–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lamminen AE (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging of primary skeletal muscle diseases: patterns of distribution and severity of involvement. Br J Radiol 63: 946–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Phoenix J, Betal D, Roberts N, Helliwell TR, Edwards RH (1996) Objective quantification of muscle and fat in human dystrophic muscle by magnetic resonance image analysis. Muscle Nerve 19: 302–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Quinlan JG, Hahn HS, Wong BL, Lorenz JN, Wenisch AS, et al. (2004) Evolution of the mdx mouse cardiomyopathy: physiological and morphological findings. Neuromuscul Disord 14: 491–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Spurney CF, Knoblach S, Pistilli EE, Nagaraju K, Martin GR, et al. (2008) Dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy in mouse: expression of Nox4 and Lox are associated with fibrosis and altered functional parameters in the heart. Neuromuscul Disord 18: 371–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chamberlain JS, Metzger J, Reyes M, Townsend D, Faulkner JA (2007) Dystrophin-deficient mdx mice display a reduced life span and are susceptible to spontaneous rhabdomyosarcoma. FASEB J 21: 2195–2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Stuckey DJ, Carr CA, Camelliti P, Tyler DJ, Davies KE, et al. (2012) In vivo MRI characterization of progressive cardiac dysfunction in the mdx mouse model of muscular dystrophy. PLoS One 7: e28569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Straub V, Donahue KM, Allamand V, Davisson RL, Kim YR, et al. (2000) Contrast agent-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of skeletal muscle damage in animal models of muscular dystrophy. Magn Reson Med 44: 655–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Amthor H, Egelhof T, McKinnell I, Ladd ME, Janssen I, et al. (2004) Albumin targeting of damaged muscle fibres in the mdx mouse can be monitored by MRI. Neuromuscul Disord 14: 791–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Odintsov B, Chun JL, Mulligan JA, Berry SE (2011) 14.1 T whole body MRI for detection of mesoangioblast stem cells in a murine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Magn Reson Med 66: 1704–1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Cahill KS, Gaidosh G, Huard J, Silver X, Byrne BJ, et al. (2004) Noninvasive monitoring and tracking of muscle stem cell transplants. Transplantation 78: 1626–1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Walter GA, Cahill KS, Huard J, Feng H, Douglas T, et al. (2004) Noninvasive monitoring of stem cell transfer for muscle disorders. Magn Reson Med 51: 273–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Martins-Bach AB, Bloise AC, Vainzof M, Rahnamaye Rabbani S (2012) Metabolic profile of dystrophic mdx mouse muscles analyzed with in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Magn Reson Imaging 30: 1167–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Xu S, Pratt SJ, Spangenburg EE, Lovering RM (2012) Early metabolic changes measured by 1H MRS in healthy and dystrophic muscle after injury. J Appl Physiol (1985) 113: 808–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dunn JF, Zaim-Wadghiri Y (1999) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 22: 1367–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mathur S, Vohra RS, Germain SA, Forbes S, Bryant ND, et al. (2011) Changes in muscle T2 and tissue damage after downhill running in mdx mice. Muscle Nerve 43: 878–886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pratt SJ, Xu S, Mullins RJ, Lovering RM (2013) Temporal changes in magnetic resonance imaging in the mdx mouse. BMC Res Notes 6: 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Pacak CA, Walter GA, Gaidosh G, Bryant N, Lewis MA, et al. (2007) Long-term skeletal muscle protection after gene transfer in a mouse model of LGMD-2D. Mol Ther 15: 1775–1781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Bach JR (2007) Medical considerations of long-term survival of Werdnig-Hoffmann disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86: 349–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Roos M, Sarkozy A, Chierchia GB, De Wilde P, Schmedding E, et al. (2009) Malignant ventricular arrhythmia in a case of adult onset of spinal muscular atrophy (Kugelberg-Welander disease). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20: 342–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.