Abstract
Introduction
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSSCs) are one of the leading causes of cancer-associated death worldwide. Although certain behavioral risk factors are well recognized as tumor promoting, there is very little known about the presence of predisposing germline mutations in HNSCC patients.
Methods
In this study, we analyzed 121 individuals with HNSCCs collected at our institution for germline alterations in the newly identified cancer susceptibility gene RAD51C.
Results
Sequencing of all exons and the adjacent introns revealed five distinct heterozygous sequence deviations in RAD51C in seven patients (5.8%). A female patient without any other risk factors carried a germline mutation that disrupted the canonical splice acceptor site of exon 5 (c.706-2A>G).
Conclusions
As there are only a few publications in the literature identifying germline mutations in head and neck cancer patients, our results provide the first indication that paralogs of RAD51, recently implemented in breast and ovarian cancers, might also be candidates for genetic risk factors in sporadic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.
Introduction
Six percent of all human malignant tumors worldwide are squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region (HNSCCs) (1). In Europe, the consumption of alcohol and nicotine are the main behavioral risk factors to develop HNSCC (2, 3), however infections with the oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) −16 or −18 strains also contribute significantly to tumorigenesis and incidence of HNSCCs (4). Genetic factors might also play a role in the development of HNSCCs at a relatively early age and especially in the absence of any known tumorigenic trigger, however almost all changes described were somatic mutations present in the tumor cells (5–13).
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare inherited recessive disorder usually diagnosed around 10 years of age, where patients without behavioral risk factors frequently develop HNSCCs in their early adulthood (14–17). The genetic causes for FA are autosomal or X-chromosomal germline defects in at least 16 different genes involved in the repair of DNA crosslinks at stalled replication forks (18–22). Cells with defects in the FA pathway show spontaneous chromosomal instability and a characteristic hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) (23). Clinically, FA patients are characterized by congenital abnormalities, progressive bone marrow failure, and the predisposition to leukemia and epithelial cancers (15). Remarkably, about 50% of FA patients without stem cell transplantation and nearly 100% of transplanted FA patients develop a squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck until 45 years of age (17).
During the last six years, heterozygous germline and also acquired defects of FA genes were identified in patients with sporadic epithelial cancers such as breast (24–26), ovarian (27, 28), cervical (29), lung (30), pancreatic (31, 32) or testicular cancer (33). Since genetic instability is also seen as a major force for driving head and neck cancer tumorigenesis (34), heterozygous germline defects in genes of the FA pathway could also be a predisposing genetic condition for the development of HNSCC. Indeed, initial work identified defects in the FA pathway in sporadic HNSCCs, such as downregulation of several FA genes in sporadic HNSCCs (35), inactivating promoter methylation in FANCB (36) and defective FANCD2 foci formation after stimulation (37).
Recently, we identified RAD51C (RAD51L2), putatively designated as FANCO (38), as a human cancer susceptibility gene for inherited breast and ovarian malignancies (39). RAD51C is one of five paralogues (RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, XRCC3) of the highly conserved RAD51 recombinase that plays a central role in the homologous repair (HR) of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian cells, mediating homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange (40, 41). In cells that are defective in any of the paralogues, the formation of RAD51 foci is strongly reduced in response to DNA damage and correlates with decreased HR efficiency, increased genomic instability and a higher incidence of chromosomal abnormalities (41, 42).
In order to determine whether RAD51C germline mutations are also a predisposing condition for the development of HNSCC, peripheral blood (PB) DNA from 121 patients (male: 97; 80.2%, female: 24; 19.8%) diagnosed with sporadic HNSCCs at our institution was analyzed for RAD51C mutations by direct sequencing (38, 39).
Materials and Methods
Patients
PB samples were collected from 121 consecutive patients of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany) with histologically confirmed HNSCCs, including all sites (55 oropharynx, 20 hypopharynx, 27 larynx, 7 Sinus, 2 scalp, 10 CUP (carcinoma of unknown primary)) and stages (cis, T1–4, N0–3, M0/1) of disease after obtaining informed consent. Research was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the University of Düsseldorf (Study No. 3515).
HPV Status
For immunohistochemical staining of p16/INK4a, 2-µm sections were stained using the CINtec PLUS kit (mtm Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously (43).
Sequencing of all 9 exons of the RAD51C gene
DNA was isolated from PB leukocytes according to the manufacturer’s recommendation (Genomic DNA purification kit, Gentra Biosystems, Minneapolis, USA). Each of the 9 exons of the RAD51C gene was amplified in a standard PCR reaction using Qiagen Mastermix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Primers and PCR conditions are shown in Table 1. The PCR products were purified (Qiaquick PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen), and mixed with ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) and primers for sense direction or for antisense direction (Table 1). After the sequencing reaction (25 cycles of 15 sec at 96°C and 4 min at 60°C), the products were purified (DyeEx 2.0 Spin Kit, Qiagen) and analyzed with an automated sequencer (ABI 310, Applied Biosystems). Positive samples underwent confirmation by repeated analysis.
Table 1.
Exon | Forward 5’ to 3’ | Reverse 3’ to 5’ | Tm (°C) | Size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AAATGGGATTTTGGGGAATC | GTAAACATGGACGTGGGAGG | TD* | 471 |
2 | AAAATTAAATGGTTGATAGAATGTTGC | TCAAGAAGGGATAATGAAGTAACAC | 65 | 583 |
3 | GACATTTCTGTTGCCTTGGG | GCTGTGGCATTTCTCATTTTG | 65 | 472 |
4 | TTTTGCTATAATTTGTCATCTTTCAG | TTGTAGGTCAAGGAAGGAAGAGA | 60 | 413 |
5 | TTACTGTTCCAGGCATTGGG | TGGAAACCAACCAAACGTAAC | 65 | 430 |
6 | GTGCATGCCACCATGTCT | TGTGTCTGGCCACTCAATAAA | 68 | 398 |
7 | GAATAATGATTTGCAGTATTTCC | CAGACAAGGCAACAAAAGTGTC | 65 | 400 |
8 | CATACGGGTAATTTGAAGGGTG | TTTGGGGACAATGTTCTAAGC | 65 | 384 |
9 | CGCCTGGCCCTAGAATAAA | GGCCACATGAGATCAGCTTT | 65 | 491 |
Primer sequences used to amplify and sequence RAD51C, with annealing temperature (Tm) and amplicon size (TD – touchdown PCR, indicates that DMSO was added to a final concentration of 10%).
Results
In total, we identified five heterozygous germline alterations in seven (3 females, 4 males) out of 121 individuals. All sequence changes were single nucleotide alterations (Table 2). The mutation c.706-2A>G was located in the canonical splice acceptor dinucleotide of intron 4 in the germline DNA from a female without any behavioral risk factors and is clearly pathogenic as it leads to a loss of exon 5 in the mRNA resulting in an in-frame deletion of 44 amino acids, pV236del44, in the RAD51C protein. This germline mutation was previously described by Walsh et al. 2011 (44) in a 70-year old stage IV ovarian cancer patient with loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) in the tumor tissue and by Loveday et al. 2012 (45) in a 56-year old female with ovarian cancer. Four missense alterations identified in six patients were located in the exons 1 (1×, c.7G>A, p.G3R), 2 (2×, c.376G>A, p.A126T), 5 (1×, c.790G>A, p.G264S) and 6 (2×, c.859A>G, p.287A), respectively.
Table 2.
Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | M | M | F | F | F | M | M |
Location | Exon 1 | Exon 2 | Exon 2 | Intron 4 | Exon 5 | Exon 6 | Exon 6 |
Nucleotide change | c.7G>A | c.376G>A | c.376G>A | c.706–2A>G | c.790G>A | c.859A>G | c.859A>G |
Protein change | p.G3R | p.126A>T | p.126A>T | Aberrant splicing | p.264G>S | p.287T>A | p.287T>A |
Tumor localization | Larynx | Larynx | Oropharynx | Oropharynxnx | Larynx | Hypopharynx | Larynx |
TNM | pT2pN2M0 | pT1bN0M0 | pT4apN0M0 | pT3pN1M1 | pT2pN2bM0 | pT2N0M0 | pT4apN0M0 |
Additional cancers | Oropharynx (pT3pN0M0) | - | - | - | Broncial CA (T3N2bM0) | - | - |
Nicotine | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y |
Alcohol consumption | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y |
HPV | positive | negative | positive | negative | n.t. | negative | positive |
Detected in breast cancer | Y | Y | Y | N (ovarian) | Y | Y | Y |
Functionally tested | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y |
Detrimental mutation | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Appearance in dbSNP | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y |
dbSNP number | n/a | rs61758784 | rs61758784 | n/a | rs147241704 | rs28363317 | rs28363317 |
Allele count (MAF source: 1000 Genomes)* | n/a | A = 0.001/2 | A = 0.001/2 | n/a | A = 0.002* | G = 0.006/13 | G = 0.006/13 |
Y = yes; n = no; n.t.= not tested (no specimen available); F = female; M = male; Ex = Exon; MAF = minor allele frequency;
source = University of Washington/Broad Institute; functional testing as depicted in Meindl et al. [39].
Four of the HNSCCs were located at the larynx, two in the oropharynx and one in the hypopharynx. The two patients with laryngeal carcinomas developed additional malignancies: one experienced an oropharyngeal carcinoma and one was diagnosed with bronchial carcinoma (Table 2). As overexpression of the p16 protein can be used as a surrogate marker for HPV infection in tissues (45), we analyzed the available tumor tissue samples of the seven patients by immunohistochemistry: samples from three patients stained p16 positive, suggesting HPV infections, and three samples were negative. From one patient (#5), tumor tissue was not available. Two patients had a combined history of regular alcohol uptake and cigarettes consumption, two other individuals smoke cigarettes, while three patients were not exposed to any of these drugs (Table 2).
Discussion
We identified five RAD51C germline alterations in seven patients with sporadic HNSCC, representing 5.8% of all analyzed 121 individuals. All patients who carried RAD51C alterations had tumors that originate from the mucus membrane as most frequent carcinoma type in our series. Four of the five changes were missense alterations that we previously reported in individuals from German pedigrees with breast and ovarian cancers (39). The functional characterizations of these four RAD51C alterations in this earlier study revealed that expression of c.7G>A (patient 1) and c.376G>A (patients 2 and 3) mutated RAD51C cDNAs transferred via retroviral vectors in Rad51c−/− chicken DT40 cells and in human RAD51C-mutated fibroblasts was associated with normal cellular survival and normal RAD51 foci formation in response to MMC exposure, respectively (39). In contrast, expression of the c.790G>A (patient 5) and the c.859A>G (patient 6 and 7) RAD51C alterations showed clearly reduced survival of RAD51c−/− DT40 cells upon MMC challenge albeit normal RAD51 foci formation (39). As the latter two missense alterations were associated with impaired cellular viability in response to DNA cross-linking agent MMC (39), we had hypothesized that these two alterations should therefore be associated with an increased cancer risk. However, comparative analysis with 2912 representative control individuals of the German population revealed that only the c.790G>A alteration in RAD51C was associated with an increased risk of 3.44 (confidence interval 1.51–7.8, p<0.005) for developing gynecological cancers (39). A similar association of RAD51C c.790G>A mutation with an increased cancer risk was also confirmed in the British study by Loveday et al. (45). The fifth RAD51C germline alteration in our patient population was a splice acceptor mutation, c.706-2A>G, that disrupts the canonical AG splice acceptor site and thereby leads to a loss of exon 5 in the transcript and a frameshift in the open reading frame with premature protein truncation. This mutation was previously detected in two individuals with ovarian cancer and classified in both publications as detrimental (44, 45).
Strikingly, three out of the seven HNSCC patients with germline alterations in RAD51C were females (43%), while only 20% of all patients in our patient cohort were women. All three women did not have any history of tobacco and alcohol consumption as typical triggers for the development of HNSCCs. The tumor in the patient 3 with the functionally normal c.376G>A alteration (39) was classified as HPV positive, thus providing an explanation for the HNSCC development in this individual. Importantly, the absence of any risk factor in patient 4 (c.706-2A>G) with a HPV16/18 negative tumor and the development of an independent lung cancer in patient 5 (c.790G>A) strongly indicated an underlying genetic cancer susceptibility in these two women, likely due to the RAD51C germline mutations. In contrast, all four male patients had a history of smoking cigarettes. Two also consumed alcohol and their tumors were classified as HPV positive. Therefore, the risk factor profiles in these four individuals were similar to those of patients without any alterations in RAD51C and characteristic for HNSCC patients. Hence, an association of the development of HNSCCs with germline changes in RAD51C was not evident in the four male patients.
The most important risk factors for HNSCCs in the western hemisphere are behavioral factors, predominantly chronic exposure to tobacco and/or alcohol and infection with HPV (4). HNSCC cancer carcinogenesis has been linked to abnormalities in DNA repair, apoptosis, carcinogen metabolism and cell cycle control (1) and somatic changes in associated genes in HNSCC tissues were described by several groups (5, 7, 8, 47–49). However, specific germline mutations predisposing to HNSCCs have only been identified in P53 and INK4a/p16 that are associated with a wide variety of human cancers (50, 51). Here, we provide first evidence that germline alterations in the established cancer susceptibility gene RAD51C (38, 39, 44, 45) are also present in HNSCC patients. These alterations in the RAD51C protein in at least 4 out of 121 patients (3%) are associated with reduced (patients 5, 6 and 7) (39) or absent (patient 4, c.706-2A>G) function, thus suggesting that germline mutations in genes of the FA pathway could contribute to the development of HNSCCs. Here, further studies of analyzing HNSCC patients for germline mutations in FA-associated genes will provide further insides whether the ’common disease, rare allele’ hypothesis (52) might also apply to a subset of HNSCC patients at relatively young age and without known risk factors.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the patients for their help and support of the study. We are indebt to Peter Enczmann for using the capillary sequencer at the Institute for Transplantation Diagnostic and Cell Therapeutics, Heinrich Heine University.
This work is supported by the HHU Forschungsförderungsfond (to K.S.), the BMBF networks of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (to H.H.) and Foamyvirus-mediated Genetic Therapy for FANCA (FoneFA, to H.H.) and the NIH R01s CA138237-01 and CA155294-01 (to H.H.). Helmut Hanenberg is supported by the Lilly Foundation Physician/Scientist initiative.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
Kathrin Scheckenbach, Marcel Freund and Helmut Hanenberg may receive royalties based on a licensing agreement with Myriad Genetics for the use of RAD51C as a cancer susceptibility gene. All other authors declare to have no conflict of interest.
Literature
- 1.Hardisson D. Molecular pathogenesis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;260(9):502–508. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0581-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mashberg A, Boffetta P, Winkelman R, Garfinkel L. Tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx among U.S. veterans. Cancer. 1993;72(4):1369–1375. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4<1369::aid-cncr2820720436>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, et al. Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res. 1988;48(11):3282–3287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goon PK, Stanley MA, Ebmeyer J, et al. HPV & head and neck cancer: a descriptive update. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lang JC, Borchers J, Danahey D, et al. Mutational status of overexpressed p16 in head and neck cancer: evidence for germline mutation of p16/p14ARF. Int J Oncol. 2002;21(2):401–408. doi: 10.3892/ijo.21.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu KK, Zanation AM, Moss JR, Yarbrough WG. Familial head and neck cancer: molecular analysis of a new clinical entity. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(9):1587–1593. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200209000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shao X, Tandon R, Samara G, et al. Mutational analysis of the PTEN gene in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1998;77(5):684–688. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980831)77:5<684::aid-ijc4>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pai SI, Wu GS, Ozoren N, et al. Rare loss-of-function mutation of a death receptor gene in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58(16):3513–3518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schwentner I, Witsch-Baumgartner M, Sprinzl GM, et al. Identification of the rare EGFR mutation p.G796S as somatic and germline mutation in white patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2008;30(8):1040–1044. doi: 10.1002/hed.20831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mahjabeen I, Baig RM, Masood N, et al. Genetic variations in XRCC1 gene in sporadic head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19(2):183–188. doi: 10.1007/s12253-012-9567-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mahjabeen I, Baig RM, Sabir M, Kayani MA. Genetic and expressional variations of APEX1 are associated with increased risk of head and neck cancer. Mutagenesis. 2013;28(2):213–218. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ges074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sabir M, Baig RM, Mahjabeen I, Kayani MA. Novel germline CDK4 mutations in patients with head and neck cancer. Hereditary cancer in clinical practice. 2012;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sabir M, Baig RM, Mahjabeen I, Saeed M, Malik FA, Kayani MA. Rb1/105 gene alterations and head and neck carcinogenesis. Molecular biology reports. 2012;39(10):9573–9581. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1822-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kutler DI, Auerbach AD, Satagopan J, et al. High incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in patients with Fanconi anemia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):106–112. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kutler DI, Singh B, Satagopan J, et al. A 20-year perspective on the International Fanconi Anemia Registry (IFAR) Blood. 2003;101(4):1249–1256. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kutler DI, Wreesmann VB, Goberdhan A, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA and p53 polymorphisms in squamous cell carcinomas from Fanconi anemia patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(22):1718–1721. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rosenberg PS, Socie G, Alter BP, Gluckman E. Risk of head and neck squamous cell cancer and death in patients with Fanconi anemia who did and did not receive transplants. Blood. 2005;105(1):67–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.D'Andrea AD. Susceptibility pathways in Fanconi's anemia and breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1909–1919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0809889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kitao H, Takata M. Fanconi anemia: a disorder defective in the DNA damage response. International journal of hematology. 2011;93(4):417–424. doi: 10.1007/s12185-011-0777-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cybulski KE, Howlett NG. FANCP/SLX4: a Swiss army knife of DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Cell Cycle. 2011;10(11):1757–1763. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.11.15818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kottemann MC, Smogorzewska A. Fanconi anaemia and the repair of Watson and Crick DNA crosslinks. Nature. 2013;493(7432):356–363. doi: 10.1038/nature11863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bogliolo M, Schuster B, Stoepker C, et al. Mutations in ERCC4, encoding the DNA-repair endonuclease XPF, cause Fanconi anemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92(5):800–806. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Winter JP, Joenje H. The genetic and molecular basis of Fanconi anemia. Mutation research. 2009;668(1–2):11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Seal S, Thompson D, Renwick A, et al. Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet. 2006;38(11):1239–1241. doi: 10.1038/ng1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rahman N, Seal S, Thompson D, et al. PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2007;39(2):165–167. doi: 10.1038/ng1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Turnbull C, Rahman N. Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:321–345. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chan KY, Ozcelik H, Cheung AN, Ngan HY, Khoo US. Epigenetic factors controlling the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in sporadic ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62(14):4151–4156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Taniguchi T, Tischkowitz M, Ameziane N, et al. Disruption of the Fanconi anemia-BRCA pathway in cisplatin-sensitive ovarian tumors. Nat Med. 2003;9(5):568–574. doi: 10.1038/nm852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Narayan G, Arias-Pulido H, Nandula SV, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of FANCF: disruption of Fanconi Anemia-BRCA pathway in cervical cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):2994–2997. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marsit CJ, Liu M, Nelson HH, Posner M, Suzuki M, Kelsey KT. Inactivation of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway in lung and oral cancers: implications for treatment and survival. Oncogene. 2004;23(4):1000–1004. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jones S, Hruban RH, Kamiyama M, et al. Exomic sequencing identifies PALB2 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. Science. 2009;324(5924):217. doi: 10.1126/science.1171202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.van der Heijden MS, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH, Kern SE. Fanconi anemia gene mutations in young-onset pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63(10):2585–2588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koul S, McKiernan JM, Narayan G, et al. Role of promoter hypermethylation in Cisplatin treatment response of male germ cell tumors. Mol Cancer. 2004;3:16. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-3-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Friedlander PL. Genomic instability in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2001;23(8):683–691. doi: 10.1002/hed.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wreesmann VB, Estilo C, Eisele DW, Singh B, Wang SJ. Downregulation of Fanconi anemia genes in sporadic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2007;69(4):218–225. doi: 10.1159/000101542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Smith IM, Mithani SK, Mydlarz WK, Chang SS, Califano JA. Inactivation of the tumor suppressor genes causing the hereditary syndromes predisposing to head and neck cancer via promoter hypermethylation in sporadic head and neck cancers. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;72(1):44–50. doi: 10.1159/000292104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Burkitt K, Ljungman M. Compromised Fanconi anemia response due to BRCA1 deficiency in cisplatin-sensitive head and neck cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2007;253(1):131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vaz F, Hanenberg H, Schuster B, et al. Mutation of the RAD51C gene in a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Nat Genet. 2010;42(5):406–409. doi: 10.1038/ng.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, et al. Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2010;42(5):410–414. doi: 10.1038/ng.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baumann P, Benson FE, West SC. Human Rad51 protein promotes ATP-dependent homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Cell. 1996;87(4):757–766. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81394-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Thacker J. The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2005;219(2):125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Takata M, Sasaki MS, Tachiiri S, et al. Chromosome instability and defective recombinational repair in knockout mutants of the five Rad51 paralogs. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(8):2858–2866. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.8.2858-2866.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reuschenbach M, Roos J, Panayotopoulos D, Baldus SE, et al. Characterization of squamous cell cancers of the vulvar anterior fourchette by human papillomavirus, p16INK4a, p53. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17(3):289–289. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31826f2b2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walsh T, Casadei S, Lee MK, et al. Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(44):18032–18037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115052108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ruark E, et al. Germline RAD51C mutations confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2012;44(5):475–476. doi: 10.1038/ng.2224. author reply 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Melkane AE, Mirghani H, Auperin A, et al. HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: A comparison between three diagnostic approaches. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.08.007. (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sanchez-Cespedes M, Okami K, Cairns P, Sidransky D. Molecular analysis of the candidate tumor suppressor gene ING1 in human head and neck tumors with 13q deletions. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;27(3):319–322. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(200003)27:3<319::aid-gcc13>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jefferies S, Edwards SM, Hamoudi RA, et al. No germline mutations in CDKN2A (p16) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck and second primary tumours. Br J Cancer. 2001;85(9):1383–1386. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Poetsch M, Lorenz G, Kleist B. Detection of new PTEN/MMAC1 mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas with loss of chromosome 10. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002;132(1):20–24. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00509-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu MC, Gelmann EP. P53 gene mutations: case study of a clinical marker for solid tumors. Semin Oncol. 2002;29(3):246–257. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.32900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vinarsky V, Fine RL, Assaad A, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in FAMMM syndrome. Head Neck. 2009;31(11):1524–1527. doi: 10.1002/hed.21050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Walsh T, King MC. Ten genes for inherited breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;11(2):103–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]