Abstract
A cluster of seven human cases of listeriosis occurred in Austria and in Germany between April 2011 and July 2013. The Listeria monocytogenes serovar (SV) 1/2b isolates shared pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism (fAFLP) patterns indistinguishable from those from five food producers. The seven human isolates, a control strain with a different PFGE/fAFLP profile and ten food isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS) in a blinded fashion. A gene-by-gene comparison (multilocus sequence typing (MLST)+) was performed, and the resulting whole genome allelic profiles were compared using SeqSphere+ software version 1.0. On analysis of 2298 genes, the four human outbreak isolates from 2012 to 2013 had different alleles at ≤6 genes, i.e. differed by ≤6 genes from each other; the dendrogram placed these isolates in between five Austrian unaged soft cheese isolates from producer A (≤19-gene difference from the human cluster) and two Austrian ready-to-eat meat isolates from producer B (≤8-gene difference from the human cluster). Both food products appeared on grocery bills prospectively collected by these outbreak cases after hospital discharge. Epidemiological results on food consumption and MLST+ clearly separated the three cases in 2011 from the four 2012–2013 outbreak cases (≥48 different genes). We showed that WGS is capable of discriminating L. monocytogenes SV1/2b clones not distinguishable by PFGE and fAFLP. The listeriosis outbreak described clearly underlines the potential of sequence-based typing methods to offer enhanced resolution and comparability of typing systems for public health applications.
Keywords: Foodborne infections, Listeria, listeriosis, outbreaks, typing, whole genome sequencing, zoonoses
Introduction
The large majority of listeriosis cases (sporadic and outbreak-related) are caused by foodborne transmission, which accounts for 99% of human cases 1,2. In an era when food production and food storage rely heavily on refrigeration, the ability of Listeria monocytogenes to grow (albeit slowly) at low temperatures has opened a new ecological niche to a pathogen that previously had only mediocre relevance. Industrialized food manufacturing also constitutes an ecological niche, owing to the ability of L. monocytogenes to form biofilms for colonization of surfaces 3. Seeliger even dubbed this zoonosis a ‘man-made disease’ 4.
In Austria, laboratories have a legal obligation to forward human and food L. monocytogenes isolates to the national reference centre; however, the source of the food isolates does not have to be notified to the reference laboratory. On 21 January 2013, the Austrian Food Authority mandated the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety to investigate the source and and public health significance of a certain pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) clone of L. monocytogenes serovar (SV) 1/2b, which, in 2012, had become the dominant Listeria strain among food isolates; the cluster strain accounted for 29 of 50 L. monocytogenes SV1/2b food isolates received at the National Reference Laboratory during the second half of 2012. At the beginning of the cluster investigation, only two invasive cases of listeriosis with this strain were known. Active case-finding revealed seven human cases of invasive listeriosis caused by L. monocytogenes SV1/2b sharing PFGE (AscI, ApaI, and SmaI) and fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism (fAFLP) (HhaI and HindIII) patterns (defined as ‘1/2b cluster strain’) (Fig.1). All cluster cases were female, the median age was 75 years (range: 71–83 years), and two cases had fatal outcomes; between April 2011 and July 2013, five cases (cases 1 and 4–7) occurred in Austria and two cases occurred in Germany (cases 2 and 3). We found isolates from food products of five producers (two in Austria, two in Germany, and one in Romania) that were indistinguishable from the human cluster isolates by PFGE (AscI, ApaI, and SmaI) and fAFLP (HhaI and HindIII). Epidemiological investigation suggested that cluster cases 4–7 (Austria, 2012 and 2013) were linked to either one of the two Austrian food producers (A and B). For cluster case 1 (Austria, 2011) and cluster cases 2 and 3 (Germany, 2011), the incriminated ready-to eat (RTE) meat products of producer B had been excluded as possible sources by the findings of the epidemiological investigation. To further investigate this listeriosis cluster, we applied whole genome sequencing (WGS) and subsequent gene-by-gene comparison (multilocus sequence typing (MLST)+).
Materials and Methods
Microorganisms
A total of 18 L. monocytogenes SV1/2b isolates were included in the WGS and subsequent gene-by-gene comparison (MLST+): they originated from the five Austrian cluster cases (AT01, 2011; AT02 and AT03, 2012; AT16 and AT18, 2013), two German cluster cases (AT14 and AT15, 2011), five Austrian unaged soft cheeses from producer A (AT05–AT08 and AT17, 2013), two Austrian RTE meat products from producer B (AT09 and AT10, 2013), one Romanian RTE meat product (AT11, 2012), and two German RTE meat products (AT12 and AT13, 2010). A human isolate (AT04) with a different PFGE/fAFLP profile was included as a control. PFGE and fAFLP were performed as described elsewhere 5–8. Table1 shows the salient features of these 18 isolates.
Table 1.
Isolate ID | Source | Details for patients (age in years, sex) and for the implicated food | Country/Year |
---|---|---|---|
AT01 | Human (case 1) | 75, female (fatal outcome) | Austria, 2011 |
AT02 | Human (case 4) | 81, female | Austria, 2012 |
AT03 | Human (case 5) | 77, female | Austria, 2012 |
AT04 | Human (control strain) | Newborn (epidemiologically unrelated case) | Austria, 2013 |
AT05 | Food | Fresh cheese (sheep) from producer A | Austria, 2013 |
AT06 | Food | Fresh cheese (sheep) from producer A | Austria, 2013 |
AT07 | Food | Fresh cheese (sheep) from producer A | Austria, 2013 |
AT08 | Food | Fresh cheese (goat) from producer A | Austria, 2013 |
AT09 | Food | Sliced ham (pork) from producer B | Austria, 2013 |
AT10 | Food | Pate (pork) from producer B | Austria, 2013 |
AT11 | Food | Frankfurter sausage (turkey) from producer C | Romania, 2012 |
AT12 | Food | Poultry meat (chicken) from producer C | Germany, 2010 |
AT13 | Food | ‘Fleischsalat’ (salad with strips of bologna-type sausage) from producer D | Germany, 2010 |
AT14 | Human (case 2) | 72, female (fatal outcome) | Germany, 2011 |
AT15 | Human (case 3) | 81, female | Germany, 2011 |
AT16 | Human (case 6) | 83, female | Austria, 2013 |
AT17 | Food | Fresh cheese (sheep) from producer A | Austria, 2013 |
AT18 | Human (case 7) | 71, female | Austria, 2013 |
WGS and data analysis
The 18 Listeria isolates were subjected to WGS in a blinded fashion. A single colony of a fresh culture was incubated overnight in brain–heart infusion broth prior to DNA extraction. One microlitre of this culture was subsequently subjected to DNA extraction with the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Sequencing libraries containing 1 ng of DNA were prepared with Nextera XT chemistry (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) for a 75-bp, 150-bp or 250-bp paired-end sequencing run on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer, according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Illumina), aiming for a minimum coverage of 75-fold 9. After quality trimming with the default parameters of the CLC Genomic Workbench software version 6 (CLC bio, Arhus, Denmark), the sequencing reads were assembled with the CLC Genomic Workbench de novo assembler with default parameters, with the exception of ‘length fraction value = 0.8’ (CLC bio). Gene sequences for subsequent analyses were extracted from contigs with Ridom SeqSphere+ software version 1.0 (Ridom, Muenster, Germany). For the gene-by-gene analysis, i.e. MLST+, as described earlier, we initially compiled a list of genes that were present in all strains analysed 10. This list, comprising 2,298 genes used for L. monocytogenes MLST+ typing, is accessible under http://www.ages.at/ages/gesundheit/mensch/listeriose/gene-by-gene-typing-of-l-monocytogenes-isolates/. The designation of the analysed genes was based on L. monocytogenes strain EGD-e (GenBank accession no. NC_003210). For phylogenetic analysis, the defined cgMLST sequences, i.e. the 2298 gene sequences, were extracted from each assembly and assessed for quality, i.e. the absence of premature stop codons and ambiguous nucleotides, and a minimum sequence coverage of ten-fold or more over the whole gene with a minimum substitution frequency in reads of 75%. If genes fulfilled all of these quality criteria, their complete sequence was analysed in comparison with L. monocytogenes strain EGD-e, and a numerical allele type was assigned by SeqSphere+. For illustration of the phylogenetic relationship of the 18 L. monocytogenes isolates, the combination of all alleles in each strain formed an allelic profile, i.e. the typing result, which was used for subsequent construction of a minimum-spanning tree with SeqSphere+ software (Ridom). The whole genome sequence reads have been deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (study accession no. PRJEB5481), and detailed WGS characteristics are shown in Table2.
Table 2.
Isolate ID | No. of assembled reads | No. of consensus sequence nucleotides (bp) | No. of contigs | Average coverage | No. of deduced genesa | ENA sample accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT01 | 1 113 738 | 3 011 773 | 49 | 55.0 | 2406 | ERS406789 |
AT02 | 1 354 880 | 3 013 172 | 44 | 66.8 | 2429 | ERS407319 |
AT03 | 1 524 321 | 3 012 460 | 36 | 75.5 | 2436 | ERS407320 |
AT04 | 1 612 866 | 3 025 964 | 44 | 79.4 | 2427 | ERS407321 |
AT05 | 2 227 840 | 3 014 120 | 39 | 108.7 | 2430 | ERS421601 |
AT06 | 2 357 928 | 3 012 372 | 44 | 115.9 | 2428 | ERS427372 |
AT07 | 2 127 139 | 3 014 249 | 41 | 105.1 | 2439 | ERS427979 |
AT08 | 1 511 647 | 3 013 045 | 41 | 74.5 | 2434 | ERS427980 |
AT09 | 1 245 078 | 3 012 059 | 49 | 60.7 | 2425 | ERS428001 |
AT10 | 5 706 271 | 3 015 193 | 51 | 152.6 | 2444 | ERS408418 |
AT11 | 1 474 303 | 3 008 842 | 41 | 73.0 | 2433 | ERS428003 |
AT12 | 5 893 062 | 2 931 547 | 75 | 159.2 | 2447 | ERS421884 |
AT13 | 3 398 658 | 2 986 020 | 42 | 97.0 | 2445 | ERS428004 |
AT14 | 998 085 | 3 012 269 | 54 | 48.8 | 2393 | ERS428005 |
AT15 | 5 772 962 | 3 012 616 | 47 | 159.3 | 2445 | ERS428009 |
AT16 | 974 292 | 3 011 808 | 47 | 48.2 | 2415 | ERS428006 |
AT17 | 2 222 068 | 3 012 212 | 47 | 109.9 | 2427 | ERS428007 |
AT18 | 1 726 262 | 3 028 709 | 74 | 136.3 | 2426 | ERS428008 |
In a pairwise comparison with L. monocytogenes strain EGD-e (GenBank accession no. NC_003210).
Results
After quality control of the WGS data, 2298 genes were finally analysed: isolates AT02, AT03, AT16 and AT18 from Austrian cluster cases 4–7 had different alleles at ≤6 genes, i.e. differed by ≤6 genes from each other (defined as outbreak cases); the dendrogram placed these isolates in between the Austrian unaged soft cheese isolates (AT05–AT08 and AT17) from producer A (≤19-gene difference from the human cluster) and the RTE meat isolates (AT09 and AT10) from producer B (≤8-gene difference from the human cluster) (Fig.2). In contrast to the German and Romanian food products, these two Austrian food products, which harboured L. monocytogenes at <30 CFU/g, appeared on grocery bills collected from the outbreak cases (cases 4–7) after hospital discharge. MLST+ clearly separated the isolates from Austrian cluster case 1 (AT01) and German cluster cases 2 and 3 (AT14 and AT15) from the outbreak cases' isolates (≥48 different genes). The two German meat isolates (AT12 and AT13) and the Romanian meat isolate (AT11) showed a ≥56-gene difference from the outbreak cases' isolates. The control SV1/2b strain (AT04) differed from the isolates with indistinguishable PFGE/fAFLP patterns by 1574 genes.
Discussion
L. monocytogenes is a particularly important cause of illness, and is mainly found in foods that are packaged and prepared commercially, rather than those prepared in the home 11. During recent decades, consumer lifestyles have changed, with less time available for food preparation, and higher consumption of RTE and takeaway foods. Changes in food production and technology have led to the production of foods with a long shelf-life that are typical ‘Listeria risk foods’, because the psychrotrophic bacteria have time to multiply, and the food does not undergo a listericidal process such as cooking before consumption. Swaminathan named the high degree of centralization and consolidation of food production and processing, the increased use of refrigerators as the primary means of preserving food and the above-mentioned changes in food consumption habits (increased consumer demand for convenient food) as the main factors increasing the incidence of listeriosis 12.
Epidemiological investigation suggested that four of the five Austrian cluster cases of L. monocytogenes SV1/2b (cases 4–7; 2012 and 2013) were linked with either one of the two microbiologically related Austrian food producers; food products from both producers appeared on grocery bills collected from these cases after hospital discharge. Already in a previous outbreak, all surviving Austrian outbreak cases had been asked to collect grocery receipts for the 3 weeks after they were discharged from hospital, to enable the collection of information on routine food consumption behaviour 13,14. This approach successfully revealed ‘Quargel’, a type of acid curd cheese available in different flavours, as the source of the 2009–2010 outbreak, which involved 34 cases of invasive listeriosis (including eight fatalities) 15.
For Austrian cluster case 1 and the German cluster cases (cases 2 and 3), all of which occurred in 2011, the incriminated RTE meat products of producer B had been excluded as possible sources by epidemiological investigation (data not shown). MLST+ was able to discriminate L. monocytogenes isolates from these three cluster cases, and these isolates were related according to PFGE and fAFLP. On the basis of these MLST+ findings, cluster cases 1–3 could be excluded from the outbreak, and the meat products from Romania and Germany were ruled out as possible sources of infection. Without MLST+, the three 2011 cases (including two fatalities) would have been incorrectly considered to be outbreak-related, resulting in the false exclusion of RTE meat products of producer B, which were sold neither in Germany nor in the sole grocery store frequented by case 1, as a possible source.
Our investigation suggests that the outbreak cases (cases 4–7; 2012 and 2013) were linked with either one of the two Austrian food producers. However, none of the 34 food samples positive for the SV1/2b cluster strain with quantitative data available yielded L. monocytogenes in numbers above 100 CFU/g (data not shown), the legal threshold in the EU.
We were unable to determine the causative vehicle among two biologically plausible suspects left: unaged soft cheese and shrink-wrapped deli meat. However, raised awareness caused by the outbreak investigation and the resulting intensification of in-factory sanitation stopped the detection of the cluster strain in food samples (Fig.3). The producer of the fresh soft cheese, producer A, was first contacted on 26 February 2013, and the producer of the RTE meat, producer B, on 4 March 2013. At the fresh soft cheese production facility of producer A, routine testing for L. monocytogenes of every batch produced (with negative results being a prerequisite for any delivery) was implemented. At the RTE meat production facility of producer B, a meat-slicer that, by intensified environmental surveillance, was identified as a possible source of L. monocytogenes contamination was sanitized. To date (February 2014), no further cases caused by the L. monocytogenes SV1/2b cluster strain have been reported since 15 July 2013 (hospitalization date of case 7). This shows that outbreak investigation and general public health action can control an outbreak even in the absence of definitive proof of a causative vehicle.
In contrast to the situation in forensic human genetics, where—with the exception of monozygotic twins—indistinguishable DNA fingerprinting patterns prove epidemiological relatedness, in bacteriology even epidemiologically unrelated isolates can yield DNA fingerprinting patterns that are indistinguishable from each other. Explanations for this might be a monomorphic population structure, which is known from other pathogens such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, or the limitation of the typing method used 16. As our data show for L. monocytogenes, pure chance can yield pairs of epidemiologically unrelated isolates with PFGE and fAFLP patterns that are indistinguishable from each other, and pairs of contemporary isolates of human and of food origin without any causal relationship. On the other hand, the maximum resolution of WGS poses a major challenge in determining meaningful similarity thresholds for grouping of related isolates to provide an appropriate level of discrimination for source attribution. The definition of such thresholds will be a major task for the scientific community and the public health authorities, using well-defined outbreak scenarios of every pathogen species of interest. The applied method has to allow for some genetic diversity between isolates from human and food sources, but only to the degree that it can still be assumed that they originate from the same source 17. WGS and genome analyses have already proven their potential to identify genes that contribute to persistence of L. monocytogenes in food production plants and to virulence 18,19. At present, we lack knowledge on the expected rate of change of L. monocytogenes in our MLST+ scheme over time, on the expected diversity within outbreak strains, and on the expected diversity between outbreak strains and source isolates. We see a clear need for this diversity information before this MLST+ scheme can be used for source attribution rather than exclusion. However, we have shown that comparative WGS with gene-by-gene-based data analysis (MLST+) is capable of discriminating L. monocytogenes SV1/2b clones grouped together by the genotyping methods PFGE (AscI, ApaI, and SmaI) and fAFLP (HhaI and HindIII). The meeting participants of a recent ECDC technical consultation on harnessing genomics for epidemiological surveillance (Paris, 1–2 October 2013) unanimously agreed that WGS will replace current typing techniques for surveillance and outbreak investigation 20. The listeriosis outbreak described clearly underlines the potential of sequence-based typing methods to offer enhanced resolution and comparability of typing systems for public health applications.
Author Contributions
D. Schmid, F. Allerberger, C. Amar, and A. Mellmann: wrote the manuscript. D. Schmid, F. Allerberge, S. Huhulescu, A. Pietzka, C. Amar, S. Kleta, R. Prager, E. Aichinger, and A. Mellmann M: performed laboratory or epidemiological investigations.
Transparency Declaration
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allerberger F, Wagner M. Listeriosis: a resurgent infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:16–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jemmi T, Stephan R. Listeria monocytogenes: food-borne pathogen and hygiene indicator. Rev Sci Tech. 2006;25:571–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Allerberger F, Dierich MP, Grundmann H, Hartung D, Bannerman E, Bille J. Typing of Austrian Listeria monocytogenes isolates by automated laser fluorescence analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1997;286:33–40. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(97)80072-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Felix B, Dao TT, Lombard B, Assere A, Brisabois A, Roussel S. The use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis in Listeria monocytogenes sub-typing. In: Magdeldin S, editor. Harmonization at the European union level, gel electrophoresis—principles and basics. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/gel-electrophoresis-principles-and-basics/harmonization-of-listeria-monocytogenes-pfge-sub-typing-at-european-union-level (last accessed 30 March 2014) [Google Scholar]
- 6.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. External quality assurance scheme for Listeria monocytogenes typing. Stockholm: ECDC, 2014. Available at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/EQA-listeria-monocytogenes.pdf (last accessed 30 March 2014)
- 7.Roussel S, Félix B, Grant K, Tam Dao T, Brisabois A, Amar C. Fluorescence amplified fragment length polymorphism compared to pulsed field gel electrophoresis for Listeria monocytogenes subtyping. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Desai M, Logan JMJ, Frost JA, Stanley J. Genome sequence-based fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism of Campylobacter jejuni, its relationship to serotyping, and its implications for epidemiological analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3823–3829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3823-3829.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jünemann S, Sedlazeck FJ, Prior K, et al. Updating benchtop sequencing performance comparison. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:294–296. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mellmann A, Harmsen D, Craig A, et al. Prospective genomic characterization of the German enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak by rapid next generation sequencing technology. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e22751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carpentier B, Cerf O. Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;145:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Swaminathan B, Cabanes D, Zhang W, Cossart P. Listeria monocytogenes. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, editors. Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007. pp. 457–491. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fretz R, Sagel U, Ruppitsch W, et al. Listeriosis outbreak caused by acid curd cheese ‘Quargel’, Austria and Germany 2009. Euro Surveill. 2010;15 . Available at: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19477 (last accessed 30 March 2014) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pichler J, Appl G, Pietzka A, Allerberger F. Lessons to be learned from an outbreak of food-borne listeriosis, Austria 2009–2010. Food Prot Trends. 2011;31:268–273. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fretz R, Pichler J, Sagel U, et al. Update: multinational listeriosis outbreak due to ‘Quargel’, a sour milk curd cheese, caused by two different L. monocytogenes serotype 1/2a strains, 2009–2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15 . Available at: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19543 (last accessed 30 March 2014) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Achtman M. Evolution, population structure, and phylogeography of genetically monomorphic bacterial pathogens. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:53–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards), 2013. Scientific opinion on the evaluation of molecular typing methods for major food-borne microbiological hazards and their use for attribution modelling, outbreak investigation and scanning surveillance: part 1 (evaluation of methods and applications) EFSA J. 2013;11:3502–3586. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Holch A, Webb K, Lukjancenko O, Ussery D, Rosenthal BM, Gram L. Genome sequencing identifies two nearly unchanged strains of persistent Listeria monocytogenes isolated at two different fish processing plants sampled 6 years apart. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2944–2951. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03715-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rychli K, Müller A, Zaiser A, et al. Genome sequencing of Listeria monocytogenes ‘Quargel’ listeriosis outbreak strains reveals two different strains with distinct in vitro virulence potential. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Stockholm ECDC. 2014. ECDC technical consultation on harnessing genomics for epidemiological surveillance—Meeting report, Paris, 1–2 October 2013. Available at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/surveillance-harnessing-genomics-meeting-paris-2013.pdf (last accessed 30 March 2014)