Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
letter
. 2014 Dec;104(12):e6–e7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302268

Medical-Legal Partnerships as a Strategy to Improve Social Causes of Stress and Disease

James Teufel 1,, Shannon Mace Heller 1, David J Dausey 1
PMCID: PMC4232103  PMID: 25320880

Chronic stress negatively impacts an individual at any point during the life course, but is particularly detrimental during critical periods including preconception, maternity, and early child development.1 Strutz et al. found that preconception chronic stressors accounted for 38% of the total disparity in birth weight between Mexican-origin Latinas and Whites; 48% between other-origin Latinas and Whites; and 29% between Blacks and Whites for first births.2 Social determinants of health influence chronic stress but are not directly impacted by traditional medical care.3 There is a significant amount of literature that describes and quantifies inequality and its causes; however, there is considerably less literature on strategies to directly ameliorate the social causes of stress and disease.

The medical-legal partnership (MLP) model integrates legal care and medical care to effectively and sustainably reduce chronic stressors and their associated negative health impact among low-income populations.4–7 In this model, medical and legal providers work together as a team to help low-income individuals get the legal assistance they need for a wide range of social stressors. These teams have the ability to transform practices, policies, and systems. Attorneys advocate on behalf of patients to help them address legal concerns ranging from housing, to health insurance to immigration. Having these legal concerns met can dramatically reduce chronic stress and improve health outcomes in low-income populations. The MLP model is currently implemented in 35 states in a wide range of health care settings.8 Figure 1 presents an example of this model applied to serve pregnant women and their families.

FIGURE 1—

FIGURE 1—

Example of the structures, processes, outcomes, and sustainability of a medical-legal partnership focused on maternal and child health.

The United States constitution does not include a provision of the right to counsel in civil law cases. This has resulted in a significant gap in legal care access. There is one private practice attorney for every 217 individuals earning above 200% of the federal poverty level, but there is only one civil legal aid attorney for every 14 229 people living at or below 200%.9 This disparity is especially significant considering almost all low income households have at least one unmet legal need.10 MLPs transform existing health care delivery systems to better address social determinants of health and thereby decrease preconception stress and adverse birth outcomes. Mothers and children embody social inequities that convert into health inequities. Reducing systemic social inequities translates into improved population health outcomes. To meet public health’s objectives, “fairness-in-all-policies” must be elevated to improve the health of vulnerable families. The MLP model provides a significant step in the right direction.

References

  • 1.Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7(1):13–30. doi: 10.1023/a:1022537516969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Strutz KL, Hogan VK, Siega-Riz AM, Suchindran CM, Halpern CT, Hussey JM. Preconception stress, birth weight, and birth weight disparities among US women. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):e125–e132. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(2):19–31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ryan AM, Kutob RM, Suther E, Hansen M, Sandel M. Pilot study of impact of medical-legal partnership services on patients’ perceived stress and wellbeing. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(4):1536–1546. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Teufel JA, Werner D, Goffinet D, Thorne W, Brown SL, Gettinger L. Rural medical-legal partnership and advocacy: a three-year follow up study. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(2):705–714. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beck AF, Klein MD, Schaffzin JK, Tallent V, Gillam M, Kahn RS. Identifying and treating a substandard housing cluster using a medical-legal partnership. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):831–838. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Atkins D, Heller SM, DeBartolo E, Sandel M. Medical-legal partnership and Healthy Start: integrating civil legal aid services into public health advocacy. J Leg Med. 2014;35(1):195–209. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2014.885333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership. Partnerships across the US. 2014. Available at: http://medical-legalpartnership.org/partnerships. Accessed August 6, 2014.
  • 9.Legal Services Corporation. Documenting the justice gap in America: the current unmet civil legal needs of low-income Americans. 2009. Available at: http://www.lsc.gov/sites/default/files/LSC/pdfs/documenting_the_justice_gap_in_america_2009.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2014.
  • 10.Teufel JA, Heller SM. The justice availability gap versus justice accessibility gap: a role for medical-legal partnerships. Bridging the Divide. July 9, 2014. Available at: http://medical-legalpartnership.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-justice-availability-gap-versus.html. Accessed August 6, 2014.

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES