Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov;237(1):5–12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.038

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the analysis.

Ref/study Study design Country of origin Number of study participant Age, mean (SD) (controls in case–control studies) Proportion male, % (controls in case-control studies) Recruitment Follow-up (years) CHD outcomes Outcome ascertainment APOE SNPs in HWE? Original report stated presence of effect modification?a
Published studies identified in the systematic review
 Gustavsson et al. [9]/INTERGENE and SHEEP Case–control Sweden 6389 54 (12) 46.2 Cases were patients with first or recurrent CHD and controls were randomly selected from the population N/A Acute MI, unstable angina, CHD exacerbations MI: changes in blood levels of the enzymes CK and LDH, specified ECG-changes and autopsy findings according to the Swedish Association of Cardiologists in 1991 Yes Yes
 Keavney et al. [7]/ISIS Case–control UK 7385 46 (10) 67.9 Cases were patients with suspected AMI and controls selected from the relatives and spouses of the case group N/A Acute MI Cardiac enzyme or electrocardiographic criteria, or both Yes No
 Liu et al. [23]/Physicians' Health Study Nested case–control USA 731 60 (9) 100 Male physicians registered with the American Medical Association 12 Fatal and nonfatal MI WHO criteria for MI. Autopsies and deaths recorded for fatal MI diagnoses. Yes No
 Talmud et al. [24]/Whitehall II Prospective cohort UK 5380 57 (6) 100 Randomly selected among British civil servants 5.8 Fatal/nonfatal MI, angina (definitive or probable) Fatal MI: national registries; nonfatal MI: MONICA criteria; angina: abnormal investigation such as angiography, exercise electrocardiography, stress imaging, study electrocardiogram or clinical confirmation Yes No



Published studies identified in the systematic review updated for incident CHD events
 Humphries et al. [6]/NPHSII Prospective cohort UK 2630 55.7 (3.2) 100 General practices, hospital clinics, coroner's offices >10 Fatal CHD (coronary deaths/fatal MI), nonfatal MI, coronary artery surgery and silent MI WHO criteria Yes Yes



Studies not previously published
 Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) Prospective cohort Denmark 8926 55.1(15.1) 44 Population-based 34 Fatal and nonfatal MI ICD-8: 410; ICD-10: I21 and I22 Yes N/A
 Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS) Prospective cohort Denmark 57,942 57.1(13.3) 44 Population-based 34 Fatal and nonfatal MI ICD-8: 410; ICD-10: I21 and I22 Yes N/A
 Czech post-MONICA Prospective cohort Czech Republic 1875 55.0 (10.3) 45 Population-based 6 Nonfatal MI ICD-10: I21 and I22 Yes N/A
 ELSA Cohort UK 5020 67.5 (9.8) 46 Respondents of Nationwide survey 11 Fatal and nonfatal CHD Fatal CHD (ICD-10: I20–I25) and self-reported CHD Yes N/A
 EPIC-Netherlands Nested case–control Netherlands 2129 54.1 (10.1) 22 Population-based 13 Fatal and nonfatal MI ICD-9: 410; ICD-10: I21, I22 Yes N/A
 EPIC-Norfolk Prospective cohort UK 22,838 59.2 (9.2) 46 Population-based 10 Fatal and nonfatal MI ICD-10: I21 and I22 Yes N/A
 HAPIEE-Czech Prospective cohort Czech Republic 6256 58.3 (7.1) 46 Population-based 7 Fatal and nonfatal MI ICD-10: I21 and I22 Yes N/A
 MRC GP Research Framework Investigators, TPT trial [30] Randomized clinical trial UK 2503 56.1 (6.7) 100 Hospital clinics 9 Coronary death, fatal and nonfatal MI WHO criteria Yes N/A

CHD, coronary heart disease; CK, creatine kinase; ECG, electrocardiogram; HWE, Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium; ICD, international classification of disease; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MI, myocardial infarction; N/A, not applicable; WHO, World Health Organization.

a

Effect modification by smoking status in the APOE–CHD relationship.