Abstract
Microvillus inclusion disease (MVID) is an autosomal recessive condition resulting in intractable secretory diarrhea in newborns due to loss-of-function mutations in myosin Vb (Myo5b). Previous work suggested that the apical recycling endosomal (ARE) compartment is the primary location for phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) signaling. Because the ARE is disrupted in MVID, we tested the hypothesis that polarized signaling is affected by Myo5b dysfunction. Subcellular distribution of PDK1 was analyzed in human enterocytes from MVID/control patients by immunocytochemistry. Using Myo5b knockdown (kd) in Caco-2BBe cells, we studied phosphorylated kinases downstream of PDK1, electrophysiological parameters, and net water flux. PDK1 was aberrantly localized in human MVID enterocytes and Myo5b-deficient Caco-2BBe cells. Two PDK1 target kinases were differentially affected: phosphorylated atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) increased fivefold and phosohoprotein kinase B slightly decreased compared with control. PDK1 redistributed to a soluble (cytosolic) fraction and copurified with basolateral endosomes in Myo5b kd. Myo5b kd cells showed a decrease in net water absorption that could be reverted with PDK1 inhibitors. We conclude that, in addition to altered apical expression of ion transporters, depolarization of PDK1 in MVID enterocytes may lead to aberrant activation of downstream kinases such as aPKC. The findings in this work suggest that PDK1-dependent signaling may provide a therapeutic target for treating MVID.
Keywords: apical recycling endosome; atypical protein kinase C; endothelial polarity; phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1; small Ras-like guanosine 3′,5′-monophosphate
loss-of-function mutations in the unconventional myosin Vb (Myo5b) result in microvillus inclusion disease (MVID), a condition characterized by severe untreatable diarrhea with an onset in the first months after birth (3, 6, 27, 36). Currently, parenteral hydration and nutrition are the only palliative treatments. Full gut transplantation is the only available treatment. The diagnosis is based on the finding of Periodic acid-Schiff-positive inclusions in enterocytes, along with decreased cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10) and small Ras-like GTPase (Rab) 8. At the ultrastructural level, microvillus atrophy and the presence of characteristic large inclusions containing brush-border-like microvilli (microvillus inclusions, MI) in about one-fifth of the enterocytes complete the diagnosis (1, 43). Several apical membrane proteins are mislocalized in MVID villus enterocytes, including CD10, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), sodium-hydrogen exchanger-3 (NHE3), sucrase isomaltase, alkaline phosphatase, villin, and carcinoembryonic antigen. There is also a decrease and relocalization of the Ras-related protein small GTPases Rab8 and Rab11 that reflect disruption of the apical endosomal compartment (1, 15, 37, 47, 49). Typically, these proteins relocalize to the MI, or to a subapical compartment, and are depleted in the apical pole of the cells.
While MVID diarrhea is considered to be secretory, transport analyses of intestinal patient mucosae revealed substantial decreases in unidirectional Na+ fluxes. A greater decrease of mucosal-to-serosal Na+ flux (83%) than the decrease in serosal-to-mucosal flux (70%) was observed. This observation implies that an imbalance of secretion over absorption results in a net secretory Na+ flux in MVID patients, as opposed to the normal net absorptive flux (41), but not a net increase in secretion. The molecular mechanisms underlying these functional changes that lead to severe diarrhea (>120 ml·kg−1·day−1) in children with MVID remain unclear.
Because Myo5b regulates vesicular transport from the apical recycling endosomal (ARE) compartment to the apical membrane (55), there is no question now that the pathogenic mechanism of MVID is a defect in membrane traffic (1). However, some features of the MVID phenotype suggest that membrane traffic alone cannot explain the disease. For example, it remains unclear why Myo5b is expressed in many epithelia but the MVID phenotype is unique to the gut (13). Likewise, because of the magnitude of the diarrhea, one would predict a crypt phenotype. Surprisingly, brush-border membrane defects and MIs are classically observed in mature villus enterocytes of the small intestine (1, 3), which are involved in absorption.
Recently, we demonstrated that a master activator of several important signaling cascades, the phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1), is associated with the ARE and the apical membrane in intestinal epithelia (24). This kinase is necessary to activate other kinases that, in turn, play essential roles in epithelial polarization and transport. Pathways activated by PDK1 include protein kinase B (Akt), atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), and serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK). Akt has been directly implicated in NHE3 exocytosis (22). NHE3 is a major transporter involved in Na+ absorption on the apical membrane of mature enterocytes. SGK is involved in the activation of NHE3 (10, 40). Finally, aPKC (ι, λ, and ζ isoforms) determines the localization and organization of tight junctions (TJ) during the onset of polarization (48) and has also been implicated in apical exocytosis (58). Akt2 is localized to the apical domain of villus enterocytes (21), whereas aPKC is apical in the crypt epithelium (54) and then restricted to the TJ region in differentiated villus enterocytes (53). In other words, these pathways are polarized because of the highly restricted localization of specific kinases.
Myo5b associates with ARE in epithelial cells by binding to small GTPase proteins such as Rab11a/b and Rab8 (16). Furthermore, Rab11, an ARE marker, is delocalized in MVID enterocytes (49, 50). Therefore, because ARE is disrupted in MVID-affected cells (12), it was natural to speculate that PDK1, associated with the ARE, may be delocalized as well. Bearing in mind that PDK1-polarized localization may be important for activation of some of its targets, such as aPKC (24), this work was undertaken to test the hypothesis that PDK1-dependent signaling may be affected downstream of the Myo5b loss-of-function mutations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Human samples.
Deidentified paraffin blocks were retrieved from a repository at the Department of Pathology. Accordingly, the protocol received a nonhuman determination under 45 CFR 46 from the Institutional Review Board.
Cells.
Caco-2BBe and Caco-2 cells were originally obtained from ATCC and cultured as described before (45). For experiments, the cells were cultured on 3-μm-pore Transwell filters (Corning) at confluency for 12 days (13–15 days after plating). For lentiviral transduction, the cells were infected with high-titer particles and rapidly selected in puromycin. Typically, the cultures were used for no more than 10 passages, and all the experiments include data from multiple transductions.
Antibodies and reagents.
The following were used: anti-Myo5b (NBP1-87746; Novus Biologicals), PDK1 (A302-130A; Bethyl), Rab11 [3539 (Cell Signaling); 05-853 (Millipore)], pT555 aPKC (GTX25813; GeneTex), phospho (p)-Akt (9275S; Cell Signaling), tubulin (T9026; Sigma), pT567 ezrin (3149; Cell Signaling), GAPDH (G9545; Sigma), antitransferrin (OneWorld Lab), transeferrin (Sigma), BX-912 (PDK1 inhibitor; 1130; Axon), and AlexaFluor-phalloidin (InVitrogen). PDK1 decoy peptide (PDKtide) Myr-KAFCGTPEYLAPEVRREPRILSEEEQEMFRDFDYIADWC was obtained from LifeTein, and its effects have been described before (24).
Short-hairpin RNA knockdown.
The pLKO.1-puro-TRC vector from Addgene (no. 10878) was used. To introduce the short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequence, the TRC stuffer was cut out. Several shRNA sequences against Myo5b were designed using the AsiDesigner online tool (http://sysbio.kribb.re.kr:8080/AsiDesigner/menuDesigner.jsf) and tested on Myo5b expression in Caco-2 cells. The most effective sequence to knock down the protein was gaGAAGAATCAGTCCATCATAgt (748–771 bp). A scrambled shRNA in the same vector was used as control.
PDK1 expression.
OmicsLink expression EX-Z0939-Lv105 was used to express human PDK1 under puromycin selection (lentiviral vector). As a control, the same vector but expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) was used (EX-EGFP, Lv105). Lentiviral vectors were packaged into lentiviral nonreplicating viral particles using a Lenti-Pac Expression Packaging Kit (GeneCopoeia).
Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy.
PDK1 immunohistochemistry in paraffin sections was achieved by antigen retrieval decloaking deparaffinized sections at 120°C in 0.05% citraconic anhydride, pH 7.4 for 5 min (28). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked in 3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 5 min.
Immunofluorescence procedures were standard.
For Rab11 and PDK1, the cells were grown on filters and fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde and then permeabilized in 0.4% saponin. The latter was kept in all solutions to incubate or wash antibodies. The use of detergent to permeabilize the cells was avoided. For immunofluorescence using antiphospho epitope antibodies, the cells were fixed in 10% tricholoacetic acid (17).
The fluorescence images were analyzed with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope using a ×63 oil immersion objective. Confocal stacks were obtained at 1,024 × 1,024 resolution and 0.5 μm spacing. For three-dimensional reconstructions (x–z view), confocal stacks were exported to Slidebook (3 I).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of cells grown on filters was performed as described before (18) with the following modifications: filter-grown Caco-2BBe cells were fixed in 2% gluteraldehyde, 0.2% tannic acid, and 20 mM EGTA in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, for 10 min at room temperature followed by 50 min on ice, washed, and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, pH 6, for 1 h, prestained with 1% uranyl acetate overnight at 4°C, dehydrated, and embedded in EMBed 812 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). After solidification, blocks were sectioned on the ultramicrotome at 60 nm setting (silver or silver-gold colored section appearance), and grids with sections were stained with 1% uranyl acetate for 20 min and Reynold's lead citrate for 1 min at room temperature. Grids were examined under a JEOL 1230 TEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca HR camera (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan).
Cell fractionation.
Cell fractionation was performed as described before (24). Briefly, confluent, differentiated cells were incubated overnight with the standard medium supplemented with 30 μg/ml transferrin (Tfn) to label endosomes. Cells (1.5 × 107) were suspended in 1 ml PBS supplemented with 1 mM EGTA and antiproteases (P8340; Sigma). The cells were homogenated by 30 strokes in a Teflon pestle homogenizer on ice and spun at 3,000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was then loaded on a 10-ml 10–40% sucrose gradient in PBS and spun for 20 h at 100,000 g. The gradient was collected in 11 fractions. Any pellet at the bottom of the tube was resuspended in PBS and analyzed as the twelfth fraction. PDK1 enzymatic activity was measured in six aliquots of each fraction in triplicate using the Kinase Assay/Inhibitor Screening Kit (CycLex, MBL) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Background was estimated in three of the aliquots without adding ATP. Only readings from fractions containing any detectable PDK1 in the immunoblot were shown.
Transepithelial electrical resistance and short-circuit current measurements.
For electrophysiological measurements, the cells were grown on Snapwell 0.4-μm pore filters (Corning) as described above. At the time of measurement, the filters were inserted in a Ussing chamber filled with standard Ringer solution supplemented with 5 mM glucose at 37°C. The chambers were continously agitated by air bubbling. Measurements were performed via two pairs of Ag/AgCl electrodes through 3 M KCl-agarose bridges using a VCC MC6 Multichannel voltage-current clamp (Physiologic Instruments) and recorded via AcqKnowledge software.
Water fluxes.
Caco-2BBe cells were grown in 6-mm 3-μm-pore Transwell filters as described above. Before the experiment, tightness of the monolayer was determined by filling the upper chamber to the top. Only filter chambers that could maintain the media level imbalance for over 24 h were used. For each experimental condition, filters in sextuplicate were used. At the beginning of the measurement, media was replaced in both chambers with fresh DMEM-F-12 10% FCS, supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml of streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin. Monolayers of cells were covered with 100 μl (apical “filter” chamber) and with 625 μl in the basal chamber, which resulted in leveled solutions in both chambers. The filter chambers were weighted (including the acrylic ring) after drying the external surface with filter paper, using a Metler Toledo precision balance. A parallel set of filters, sealed with paraffin and without cells, was loaded with an identical amount of apical chamber medium to control for evaporation. All filter chambers were incubated for 18 h in a regular humidified CO2 incubator. Weights were measured and repeated after that period. Next, the apical medium was replaced by the same volume containing 100 mM sucrose. The filters were then weighed again and 3 h later to determine osmotic fluxes. Typically, raw data were as follows: total weight of the filter chambers and solution was in the range of 600–700 mg. Weight was reproducible for the same filter to a 1-mg precision. Evaporation resulted in filter chamber weight loss of 0–1 mg in 18 h (within measurement error, the average of sextuplicates was used). Isoosmotic fluxes resulted in 5–20 mg weight loss per filter in the same period. Conversely, osmotic fluxes resulted in 5- to 15-μg weight gains in 3 h.
Statistics.
Data are presented as averages ± SD. Significance was analyzed by Student's t-test. P values are indicated in the legends for Figs. 1–7.
Fig. 1.
Redistribution of phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) signal in microvillus inclusion disease (MVID) patient intestinal samples. Immunocytochemistry of PDK1 in human samples from patients with unrelated disease (control) or MVID (MVID and isotype control). Arrow shows normal apical distribution. Bars, 10 μm.
Fig. 7.
Net water fluxes measured in Caco-2BBe cells under Myo5b kd or PDK1 overexpression. A: net water fluxes are shown relative to the average in scrambled cells with no treatment (1 corresponds to an absolute 2.8 ± 0.4 μl·h−1·cm−2 mucosal to serosal). Treatments included 5 μM BX-912 or 50 μM PDK1 decoy peptide (PDKtide), myristoylated PDK1 nonphosphorylatable decoy target peptide added from the basolateral chamber (Pep). Fluxes in PDK1 cells (shown in Fig. 5) are normalized to the fluxes in GFP-expressing cells (1.9 ± 0.6 μl·h−1·cm−2 mucosal to serosal). B: the same Caco-2BBe cultures were exposed to an apical 100 mosmol/kgH2O gradient for 3 h and equally normalized to the control cells (scrambled cells 11.6 ± 2.2 μl·h−1·cm−2, GFP cells 12.5 ± 4.7 μl·h−1·cm−2 for a 100 mosmol/kgH2O gradient). Data are presented as averages ± SD. *P < 0.05 (n = 3).
RESULTS
PDK1 is delocalized in MVID enterocytes and in Myo5b knockdown intestinal cells.
First, we wanted to verify if the polarized distribution of PDK1 observed in mouse small intestine is also present in human enterocytes and affected in MVID. To this end we analyzed existing deidentified paraffin blocks and biopsies from five patients with unrelated diseases (control, 3 small intestine, 2 colon) and from five MVID patients (3 small intestine, 2 colon). After antigen retrieval, the sections were stained with an anti-PDK1 antibody or an isotype control at the same dilution. As expected, in the control samples, PDK1 signal appeared in the subapical region (Fig. 1), even in villus enterocytes. This is a difference with the mouse, where such a distribution was only observed in the crypts, but not in villus (24). Conversely, in MVID patient samples, the distribution was diffuse, mostly perinuclear and in the basal pole of the cells, with some level of apical distribution remaining only in a fraction of the cells (Fig. 1). A similar observation was recently reported in one MVID patient by another group (5). In the MVID colon samples, there was also an overall increase in PDK1 signal throughout the cytoplasm compared with controls (data not shown). Because immunocytochemistry is not quantitative, it is not possible to assert whether the MVID images represent an increase in PDK1 signal or a change in its subcellular localization.
To independently confirm this result, we used Caco-2BBe human colon carcinoma cells, which differentiate and become well polarized in culture (34). They are considered a model of villus enterocytes in culture because they express NHE3 and CFTR (2, 19, 59). We used shRNA transduced by lentiviral particles followed by puromycin selection. A scrambled shRNA was used as a control. Recently, another group showed that parental Caco-2 cells under lentiviral-delivered constitutive expression of Myo5b shRNA, or under RNAi treatment, reproduce many MVID features (42, 50). The Myo5b knockdown (kd) was very effective (Fig. 2A). In the same cells, there was little or no change in PDK1 levels. However, the phosphorylation status of a PDK1 target (29), the active forms of aPKC (pT555), increased fivefold (Fig. 2C). Phosphorylation of another PDK1 target, Akt, was not significantly altered (Fig. 2, B and C).
Fig. 2.
Immunoblot analysis of Caco-2BBe cells constitutively expressing scrambled (s) or anti-Myo5b short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) [knockdown (kd)]. A: expression of myosin Vb (Myo5b), PDK1, phospho (p)-protein kinase C (PKC) ι turn domain (T555), and PKCι/ζ. B: in a separate set of experiments, expression and phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt) was determined by immunoblot. C: quantification of the signal in the kd extracts relative to the signal in scrambled (both adjusted to loading control) in independent experiments like those shown in A and B (n = 4), *P < 0.01.
The functional effects of Myo5b kd were first assessed by the development of MI. As a brush-border marker, we used pT567-ezrin, which is the activated form of ezrin. In cells expressing scrambled shRNA, ezrin was localized exclusively to the brush border. Less than 1% of the cells showed MIs, which are characteristic of cell lines derived from carcinomas (52). Conversely, stable transduction of anti-Myo5b shRNA rendered a proportion of cells with MIs that matches that of the human MVID (∼20%) phenotype. The MIs were located deep in the cytoplasm at or below the level of the nuclei (Fig. 3A). These results were independently confirmed by TEM (Fig. 3B) and fluorescent phalloidin staining (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
Phenotype of Caco-2BBe Myo5b kd cells. A: confocal X–Y stacks of scrambled shRNA control and Myo5b kd cells were analyzed as follows: for the blue channel (DAPI) the maximum projection of the entire confocal stack is shown. For the apical region ∼5–10 confocal sections (taken at 0.5-μm spacing) were used for apical maximum projections. For the basal region, 10–20 sections starting at the nuclear level and ending at the filter were used for basal maximum projections (red channel). The merge images correspond to the basal region only. B: transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Caco-2BBe Myo5b kd cells basal region (immediately above the filter). MI, microvillus inclusion; Nu, nucleus. Bar, 2 μm. C: confocal X–Y sections of Caco-2BBe Myo5b kd cells fixed in formaldehyde and stained with fluorescent phalloidin and DAPI. Arrows show MIs. Bars, 10 μm. D: confocal X–Z sections of Caco-2BBe constitutively expressing scrambled or anti-Myo5b shRNA. Specific signals for small Ras-like GTPase (Rab) 11, ezrin, PDK1, or PKCι/λ are shown in red. Arrows show Rab11, abnormal supranuclear localization; ezrin, lateral and basal vacuoles (MIs); PDK1 basal cellular protrusion into a filter pore; atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), normally localized signal (in scrambled) and basolateral signal (kd). Two panels, showing different typical images of aPKC mislocalization are shown. The bottom panel for aPKC staining (Myo5b kd cells) shows cultures treated overnight with 5 μM BX-912, a PDK1 inhibitor. Bars, 10 μm.
Next, we tested whether Myo5b kd affects the ARE in cultured cells similar to MVID patients. Rab11, an ARE marker, appeared uniformly distributed under the apical domain in control (scrambled shRNA) cells. This Rab11 apical layer became very discontinuous in most Myo5b kd cells. In fact, Rab11 signal coalesced in spherical supranuclear structures in 18% of the cells (Fig. 3D). The distribution of these structures was very different compared with the subcellular distribution of MIs as shown by phosphoezrin (Fig. 3D).
We then determined the localization of PDK1 to test whether or not a subcellular redistribution could be induced by Myo5b kd, similar to that seen in MVID samples. As described before (24), PDK1 was apically localized in scrambled control shRNA cells. In contrast, PDK1 was concentrated in the basal pole of the Myo5b kd cells (Fig. 3D). This is consistent with the delocalization of PDK1 observed in human MVID enterocytes (Fig. 1). Because the immunoblot analysis showed a substantial increase in active aPKC in Myo5b kd cells, we also localized the active form of this kinase (phosphorylated turn domain). In control cells, it was exquisitely localized to the apicalmost part of the lateral domain, in the TJ region (Fig. 3D). Colocalization of aPKC and TJ has been shown before (57). This localization was disrupted in Myo5b kd cells. Whereas some cells retained a localization that resembled control, grossly delocalized aPKC was observed in approximately one out of four cells. The abnormal images included extensive apical aPKC distribution and lateral domain localization as well as punctate localization in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3D). To determine whether mislocalization of aPKC is indeed dependent on PDK1 activity, Myo5b kd cells were incubated in the presence of the PDK1 inhibitor BX-912 (7) or vehicle. Inhibition of PDK1 abolished the cytoplasmic and lateral membrane pT555-PKCι signal (Fig. 3D, bottom).
To further characterize the PDK1 subcellular compartment(s), we fractionated Caco-2BBe postnuclear supernatants on sucrose gradients. This procedure separates apical membrane and ARE (at the top of the gradient) from common and basolateral (lower in the gradient) endosomes (8, 24, 32). In these experiments, the cells were supplemented with an excess of Tfn from the apical side overnight to label all endosomes. In scrambled control shRNA cells, PDK1 comigrated with Rab11, as we described before in Caco-2 cells. It was not present in the Tfn-containing compartment that excludes Rab11, which is generally identified as common and basolateral endosomes (24) (Fig. 4). Conversely, in the Myo5b kd cells, Rab11 was displaced to a denser fraction (Fig. 4A). PDK1 shifted into two different compartments that exclude Rab11: 1) the top fraction of the gradient, which corresponds to cytosolic protein, and, possibly, floating lipid compartments; and 2) fractions in lanes 6 and 7, where PDK1 copurified with Tfn, but not with Rab11 (Fig. 4A). The appearance of PDK1 in the top fraction was also observed before in cells where endocytosis was disrupted by dynamin inhibition (24). Therefore, the PDK1 shift to the top fraction may be characteristic of a disruption of apical endosomes. Copurification of PDK1 with basolateral endosomes, on the other hand, has not been observed in Caco-2 cells before. It is consistent with a redistribution of PDK1 under Myo5b loss-of-function. Overall, both changes are coherent with the morphological redistribution of PDK1 resulting from Myo5b deficiency observed in human MVID intestine (Fig. 1) and Caco-2BBe cells (Fig. 3). Importantly, PKD1 was active in all membrane compartments to which it relocalized but not in the supernatant (Fig. 4B), indicating that the enzyme is still activated when “abnormally” associated with basolateral endosomes.
Fig. 4.
Distribution of PDK1 in Caco-2BBe endosomal compartments. Caco-2BBe Myo5b kd and scrambled control cells were cultured to full differentiation on filters and loaded overnight with 30 μg/ml transferrin (Tfn) from the apical side. Under these conditions, Tfn labels all endosomal compartments. After homogenization, cell postnuclear supernatants were fractionated in 10–40% sucrose gradients and analyzed by immunoblot (A). Lane 1 corresponds to the top of the gradient. Arrows point at differences observed in the Myo5b-deficient cells. B: aliquots of each fraction showing PDK1 in any of the gradients were used to measure PDK1 enzymatic activity. The bars represent the means ± SD of absorbance at 450-nm (A450) values adjusted to the background absorbance of the same samples measured without ATP.
Overexpression of PDK1 does not phenocopy Myo5b kd.
The immunohistochemical distribution of PDK1 in MVID intestine opened the possibility that PDK1 might be upregulated in Myo5b loss-of-function. Although there are no substantial changes in the overall expression of PDK1 in Myo5b kd cells (Fig. 2), we speculated that overexpressing the protein would lead to delocalization. Furthermore, it was expected that overexpression of PDK1 may mimic the increase in aPKC phosphorylation (Fig. 2). Caco-2 cells were stably transduced with PDK1 or green fluorescent protein (as control). The expression levels varied with different transductions but were typically two- to fourfold over the endogenous PDK1 levels. The levels of active aPKC varied only threefold (Fig. 5B), which is less than the change compared with that induced by Myo5b kd (Fig. 2). More importantly, the overexpressed PDK1 was not delocalized but rather remained in the same subapical layer as in control cells (Fig. 5B). Together with the lack of change in PDK1 expression in Myo5b kd cells (Fig. 2), this result supports the notion that delocalization of PDK1 in human MVID (Fig. 1) and the steep upregulation of active aPKC reported above are unlikely to be due to overall changes in PDK1 expression.
Fig. 5.
PDK1 overexpression in Caco-2BBe cells. A: Caco-2BBe cells expressing PDK1 or green fluorescent protein (GFP) were analyzed by immunoblot. B: quantification of PDK1 and p-aPKC signals in Myo5b kd cells, normalized to loading controls, relative to the values in GFP-expressing control cells. Data are presented as averages ± SD (n = 3). C: confocal X–Z sections of parallel cultures grown on filters. PDK1 signal is in red. Bar, 10 μm.
Inhibition of PDK1 shows different effects on control or Myo5b kd cell short-circuit current.
To further characterize ion transport, we analyzed Caco-2BBe cells expressing scrambled or Myo5b shRNA in Ussing chambers. After 15 days in culture as confluent monolayers, transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was not impaired by Myo5B kd (Fig. 6A), and well within reported values for these cells (23), indicating that lentiviral transductions do not significantly affect TJ permeability. The TER values were not significantly changed by overnight incubation in BX-912.
Fig. 6.
Electrophysiology of Caco-2BBe Myo5b kd cells. A: transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) in Caco-2BBe cells (scrambled or Myo5b kd) grown for 15 days, supplemented (or not) with 5 μM BX-912 PDK1 inhibitor overnight. B: short-circuit current in Ringer solution (black) or the same cells in a modified Ringer with Cl− replaced by gluconate (gray bar). BX-912 was used as in A. Data are presented as averages ± SD (n = 3).
Likewise, a modest short-circuit current (Isc, −1 to −2 μA/cm2; Fig. 6B) was detected, similar to previous reports (14), and did not change significantly in Myo5b kd cells. In normal Caco-2 cells, this Isc is completely abrogated by ouabain (14), suggesting that the Na+-K+-ATPase is the electrogenic component. Accordingly, Isc did not change in scrambled cells when Cl− was replaced by gluconate in the Ringer solution in the same membranes (Fig. 6B). However, the Isc was abolished by replacing Cl− with gluconate in the Myo5b kd cells. This effect was partially rescued by the PDK1 inhibitor BX-912 (Fig. 6B). This result indicates that, although the absolute Isc is similar, there is a shift in the electrogenic mechanism in Myo5b kd cells from a cation- to an anion-based transport. In normal intestinal epithelia, an electrogenic Cl− transport activated by neurotransmitters was recently reported (35). Although this difference likely reflects differential redistribution of ion transporters due to a membrane traffic defect, it highlights the fact that the changes may be also dependent on intracellular signaling pathways regulating those transporters since it can be modified by BX-912.
Inhibition of PDK1 shows differential effects on isotonic net water transport that is dependent on Myo5b expression.
To measure net water flux, we developed a method modified from Ref. 30 by seeding Caco-2BBe cells on Transwell filters and determining changes in chamber weight as a function of time, after accounting for evaporation. For more precise measurements and stronger statistical power, we used 6-mm inserts in sextuplicate for 18-h periods (Fig. 7A). The same method was applied to measure osmotically induced water fluxes (Fig. 7B).
The absolute values of net water flux in control cells (2.8 ± 0.4 μl·h−1·cm−2 mucosal to serosal) in the absence of external osmotic or hydrostatic pressures were almost identical to those reported in the original publication (30), and ∼58-fold lower than those reported for basal isosmotic water absorption in the small intestine in vivo (4). This factor is consistent with the folding in the intestinal epithelium (56) when compared with a flat monolayer of epithelial cells in culture. Myo5b kd resulted in a significant reduction in water absorption that was fully rescued by BX-912 (Fig. 7A). The same experiments were independently repeated using a nonphosphorylatable PDK1 decoy peptide that contains the PDK1 binding and target domains. This myristoylated peptide has been shown to inhibit PDK1 (24). Like BX-912, the decoy peptide also rescued water absorption. PDK1 expression, on the other hand, significantly increased the absorptive net water flux. This result also bodes well with the effect of BX-912 on scrambled control cells, which decreased the flux (Fig. 7). In summary, inhibition of PDK1 has opposite effects in the Myo5b kd background compared with the scrambled control. Because stable expression renders PDK1 in its normal location (Fig. 5) while Myo5b kd delocalizes PDK1, these data suggest that depolarization of PDK1 (Figs. 1–4) is responsible for decreased water absorption under Myo5b loss-of-function conditions.
When untreated control (scrambled shRNA) cells were subjected to an apical 100 mosmol/kgH2O gradient, the net water flux was 11 ± 2.3 μl·h−1·cm−2 serosal to mucosal. This value is slightly below that observed in a previous publication (30) using T84 cells (8 μl·h−1·cm−2 for the same gradient). Importantly, neither Myo5b kd nor PDK1 expression had any effect on osmotically driven water flows. BX-912 decreased the water flux in control cells (Fig. 7B). This result suggests that the changes induced by PDK1 and Myo5B kd in water absorption may be related to activity or distribution of ion transporters rather than transepithelial water permeability.
DISCUSSION
Decreased expression of ion transporters on the enterocyte apical membrane has been demonstrated in MVID. In the current study, we show that a Myo5b loss-of-function mutation also results in changes in polarized signaling. More importantly, inhibition of PDK1 restores normal isotonic net water (mucosal to serosal) flux in Myo5b kd Caco-2 cells, suggesting that modulation of apical signaling pathways could restore intestinal fluid loss in MVID.
Endosomes are broadly recognized as the location for essential intracellular signaling events. Disruption of membrane traffic resulting in modifications of endosomal compartments lead to dramatic changes in the signaling cascades associated to the endosomes (26, 33). Several pathways, including Akt (31), are known to require endosomal scaffolding. However, the functional role of endosomal scaffolds in other pathways that rely on PDK1 activation remains unclear. In this study, we found that PDK1-associated apical endosomes in intestinal epithelia are dramatically relocalized as a consequence of Myo5b loss-of-function, both in human MVID and in Caco-2BBe cells in culture. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of PDK1 rescues functional signaling changes associated with the Myo5b loss-of-function, including net water absorption and Na+-dependent Isc. Therefore, the change in PDK1 subcellular distribution seems to be an as yet unrecognized factor controlling water transport. Accordingly, we speculate that PDK1 redistribution and the resulting changes in the downstream cascades are contributing factors to diarrhea in MVID.
The lack of an animal model for MVID has required use of a cultured polarized intestinal Caco-2BBe cell model. MIs have been observed in enterocytes from a Rab8 knockout mouse model (47). However, mutations in Rab8 have not been identified in human MVID. These animals mimic the MVID phenotype at the subcellular level because the mutation affects apical protein distribution only and preserves basolateral polarity. The Rab8 knockout mice show intestinal malabsorption but survive 3–4 wk after birth. Whereas the original publication does not show water balance data in the mice, these survival rates are not compatible with severe secretory diarrhea that is observed in human MVID. Recently, a conditional cdc42 knockout mouse model revealed MIs and brush-border disorganization. These animals lack diarrhea and survive >50 days. Conversely, they display gross changes in the mucosal structure, uncharacteristic of MVID (25, 44). It is important to highlight that MIs are diagnostic of MVID in the clinical context of the early intractable diarrhea. However, MI-like structures have been observed in epithelial cells under conditions independent of MVID. MI-like structures (also termed VACs) can be observed in epithelial cells prevented from forming normal lateral domains (51), as well as in a variety of carcinomas (“intracellular lumens”) (38, 52). As a matter of fact, Caco-2 cells display MIs/VACs in ∼1% of the cells spontaneously. In this study, we showed that the fraction of cells with MIs increases about 20-fold as a result of the Myo5b kd. Therefore, the strength of the Caco-2 cell model of MVID resides not only in the morphological phenotype but also in the abnormal water transport as demonstrated in the Myo5b kd, a feature that has not been observed in available animal models. An additional advantage of the Caco-2 model is that it may allow a simple reproducible method to measure net water flux in medium or high-throughput screens to test small molecules with therapeutic value in MVID. The current study provides proof-of-principle to validate such a method.
Following efficient Myo5b kd, Caco-2BBe cells seem to closely mimic the features of the MVID epithelia in terms of numbers of MIs, PDK1 distribution, and changes in water flux. Several additional similarities between the constitutive Myo5b kd in Caco-2 cells and MVID intestinal epithelia have been recently published, including: 1) loss of apical microvilli; 2) delocalization of Rab11, early endosome antigen, as well as lysosome-associated membrane protein-2; and 3) decreased lipid absorption, which mimics the nutrient malabsorption in MVID (42, 50). Our results differ from Ref. 50 in that we did not find any change in TER, which is consistent with published data from human MVID mucosae (41). Their measurements were performed at days 5 and 10, when the monolayers are not fully differentiated, whereas we measured TER after 2 wk in culture. More importantly, we used a subclone of the Caco-2 cell, the Caco-2BBe, which was originally selected to have higher levels of TER than the parental Caco-2 line. The reason for using this subclone is that, unlike the parental cell line, it expresses CFTR and better mimics the villus enterocytes. Caco-2BBe, therefore, are better suited for water transport studies. Admittedly, even in these cells the Myo5b kd model did not show a net secretory phenotype, only a decrease in absorption. Nonetheless, it allowed us to demonstrate that a mild overexpression of PDK1 or pharmacological inhibition of the same kinase results in significant effects on net water fluxes that change in the Myo5b kd background. It is worth mentioning that a PDK1 hypomorphic mouse model (39) shows decreased amino acid absorption in the intestine and a decrease in NHE3 brush-border activity (46), which is consistent with our BX-912 data. In other words, a decreased apical PDK1 activity (either by partial loss of expression in the hypomorphic mice or by redistribution in Myo5b loss-of-function) is expected to result in reduced NHE-3 activity, possibly through the local decrease in SGK activation (10). These examples highlight the idea that the effects shown in the current study are not necessarily direct effects of PDK1 activity on ion channels or transporters.
The observed immunohistochemical distribution of PDK1 in MVID patient biopsies suggested two possible nonmutually excluding consequences of Myo5b mutations on PDK1: 1) a change in localization; and 2) a possible upregulation. We could not verify the latter in the biopsies because of the minimal amount of material available. Two independent pieces of evidence suggest that increased amounts of PDK1 are not involved in the phenotype: 1) a mild overexpression of PDK1 did not result in mislocalization of the enzyme or phospho-aPKC signal (Fig. 5); and 2) increased expression of PDK1 resulted in an increase, rather than decrease, of isotonic water absorption (Fig. 7). Finally, published data from the hypomorphic PDK1 mouse model suggest that there is normally a large excess of the enzyme (20). Therefore, although we cannot fully rule out an increase in PDK1 levels in MVID human patients, we are inclined to consider localization of the enzyme in abnormal compartments (such as basolateral endosomes), a more consistent explanation for the functional data. In this scenario, inhibition of the mislocalized enzyme (either with BX-912 or the decoy peptide) rescues the abnormal water fluxes. Conversely, this model is also consistent with the finding that normally localized PDK1 in control cells causes the opposite effect (Fig. 7).
The mechanism for apical localization of PDK1 remains unclear (24). PDK1 is known to localize to membranes through the COOH-terminal PH domain, which binds phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PIP3) (60). This poses a conundrum, because PIP3 has been found in the basolateral domain in MDCK cells (11) and in common recycling endosomes (9). Conversely, in the intestine, Akt2 (which also displays a PH domain to attach to membranes) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) have been shown to be present in brush-border membranes (21). Accordingly, we hypothesize that the most likely mechanism to explain the delocalization of PDK1 would be a redistribution of Ptdins downstream of Myo5b loss-of-function.
The central premise arising from our data, however, has potential implications for MVID. In early studies on MVID patients, researchers speculated that partial resection of the gut would balance the diarrhea. It was concluded, however, that even a small segment of remaining MVID-affected small intestine would lead to dehydration (41). This observation implies an absolute requirement for any gene replacement to be effective in most stem cells. Such a therapy for MVID remains technologically impossible at this time. Therapeutic manipulation of signaling cascades, on the other hand, is commonly employed for cancer and other diseases. Akt and PI3K inhibitors are in clinical trials for a variety of malignancies, and sirolimus (rapamycin) has been tried as a treatment for polycystic kidney disease. While PDK1 inhibitors may be too toxic for an actual therapeutic use in infants, we speculate that detailed studies of the changes in polarized signaling resulting from Myo5b loss-of-function mutations may result in possible clinical therapies for MVID diarrhea. Those studies should include the PDK1 target kinases affected by PDK1 relocalization and the ion channels/transporters that functionally change as a consequence of signaling changes. The results presented here indicate that indeed pharmacological manipulation of signaling can rescue Myo5b-dependent changes in isotonic water fluxes and Isc.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants R01-DK-087359 and R01-DK-076652. R. Forteza was a recipient of postdoctoral fellowship F32-DK-095503.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
D.K., M.M.R., N.A.A., and P.J.S. conception and design of research; D.K., R.F., and P.J.S. performed experiments; D.K., A.M., R.F., M.M.R., N.A.A., and P.J.S. edited and revised manuscript; D.K., A.M., R.F., M.M.R., N.A.A., and P.J.S. approved final version of manuscript; A.M., R.F., and P.J.S. analyzed data; A.M. and P.J.S. prepared figures; M.M.R., N.A.A., and P.J.S. interpreted results of experiments; P.J.S. drafted manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to Dr. Robert Warren for critically reading the manuscript and Yolanda Menendez for excellent technical assistance. The water transport method was inspired by the teachings of Dr. Mario N. Parisi.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ameen NA, Salas PJ. Microvillus inclusion disease: a genetic defect affecting apical membrane protein traffic in intestinal epithelium. Traffic 1: 76–83, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Collaco AM, Geibel P, Lee BS, Geibel JP, Ameen NA. Functional vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) proton pumps traffic to the enterocyte brush border membrane and require CFTR. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 305: C981–C996, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cutz E, Rhoads JM, Drumm B, Sherman PM, Durie PR, Forstner GG. Microvillus inclusion disease: an inherited defect of brush-border assembly and differentiation. N Engl J Med 320: 646–651, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Jonge HR. The response of small intestinal villous and crypt epithelium to choleratoxin in rat and guinea pig. Evidence against a specific role of the crypt cells in choleragen-induced secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta 381: 128–143, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dhekne HS, Hsiao NH, Roelofs P, Kumari M, Slim CL, Rings EH, van Ijzendoorn SC. Myosin Vb and Rab11a regulate phosphorylation of ezrin in enterocytes. J Cell Sci 127: 1007–1017, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Egritas O, Sari S, Dalgic B, Poyraz A, Ensari A. The diagnosis and outcomes of persistent diarrhea in infants aged 0–24 months–a Turkish cohort study. Turk J Gastroenterol 22: 260–269, 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Feldman RI, Wu JM, Polokoff MA, Kochanny MJ, Dinter H, Zhu D, Biroc SL, Alicke B, Bryant J, Yuan S, Buckman BO, Lentz D, Ferrer M, Whitlow M, Adler M, Finster S, Chang Z, Arnaiz DO. Novel small molecule inhibitors of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1. J Biol Chem 280: 19867–19874, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fialka I, Pasquali C, Lottspeich F, Ahorn H, Huber LA. Subcellular fractionation of polarized epithelial cells and identification of organelle-specific proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18: 2582–2590, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fields IC, King SM, Shteyn E, Kang RS, Folsch H. Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate localization in recycling endosomes is necessary for AP-1B-dependent sorting in polarized epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 21: 95–105, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fuster DG, Bobulescu IA, Zhang J, Wade J, Moe OW. Characterization of the regulation of renal Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 by insulin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292: F577–F585, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gassama-Diagne A, Yu W, ter Beest M, Martin-Belmonte F, Kierbel A, Engel J, Mostov K. Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate regulates the formation of the basolateral plasma membrane in epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 8: 963–970, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Golachowska MR, Dael CM, Keuning H, Karrenbeld A, Hoekstra D, Gijsbers CF, Benninga MA, Rings EH, Ijzendoorn SC. Divergent effects of MYO5B mutations on apical brush border and apical recycling endosome organization in kidney and intestinal epithelial cells of microvillus inclusion disease patients presenting with transient renal fanconi syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 54: 491–498, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Golachowska MR, van Dael CM, Keuning H, Karrenbeld A, Hoekstra D, Gijsbers CF, Benninga MA, Rings EH, van Ijzendoorn SC. MYO5B mutations in patients with microvillus inclusion disease presenting with transient renal Fanconi syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 54: 491–498, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grasset E, Pinto M, Dussaulx E, Zweibaum A, Desjeux JF. Epithelial properties of human colonic carcinoma cell line Caco-2: electrical parameters. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 247: C260–C267, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Groisman GM, Amar M, Livne E. CD10: a valuable tool for the light microscopic diagnosis of microvillous inclusion disease (familial microvillous atrophy). Am J Surg Pathol 26: 902–907, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hales CM, Vaerman JP, Goldenring JR. Rab11 family interacting protein 2 associates with Myosin Vb and regulates plasma membrane recycling. J Biol Chem 277: 50415–50421, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hayashi K, Yonemura S, Matsui T, Tsukita S. Immunofluorescence detection of ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins with their carboxyl-terminal threonine phosphorylated in cultured cells and tissues. J Cell Sci 8: 1149–1158, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hegan PS, Mermall V, Tilney LG, Mooseker MS. Roles for Drosophila melanogaster myosin IB in maintenance of enterocyte brush-border structure and resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4625–4636, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kravtsov DV, Caputo C, Collaco A, Hoekstra N, Egan ME, Mooseker MS, Ameen NA. Myosin Ia is required for CFTR brush border membrane trafficking and ion transport in the mouse small intestine. Traffic 13: 1072–1082, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lawlor MA, Mora A, Ashby PR, Williams MR, Murray-Tait V, Malone L, Prescott AR, Lucocq JM, Alessi DR. Essential role of PDK1 in regulating cell size and development in mice. EMBO J 21: 3728–3738, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li X, Leu S, Cheong A, Zhang H, Baibakov B, Shih C, Birnbaum MJ, Donowitz M. Akt2, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and PTEN are in lipid rafts of intestinal cells: role in absorption and differentiation. Gastroenterology 126: 122–135, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lin R, Murtazina R, Cha B, Chakraborty M, Sarker R, Chen TE, Lin Z, Hogema BM, de Jonge HR, Seidler U, Turner JR, Li X, Kovbasnjuk O, Donowitz M. d-Glucose acts via sodium/glucose cotransporter 1 to increase NHE3 in mouse jejunal brush border by a Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor 2-dependent process. Gastroenterology 140: 560–571, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marano CW, Lewis SA, Garulacan LA, Soler AP, Mullin JM. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha increases sodium and chloride conductance across the tight junction of CACO-2 BBE, a human intestinal epithelial cell line. J Membr Biol 161: 263–274, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mashukova A, Forteza R, Wald FA, Salas PJ. PDK1 in apical signaling endosomes participates in the rescue of the polarity complex atypical PKC by intermediate filaments in intestinal epithelia. Mol Biol Cell 23: 1664–1674, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Melendez J, Liu M, Sampson L, Akunuru S, Han X, Vallance J, Witte D, Shroyer N, Zheng Y. Cdc42 coordinates proliferation, polarity, migration, and differentiation of small intestinal epithelial cells in mice. Gastroenterology 145: 808–819, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miaczynska M. Effects of membrane trafficking on signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cold Spring Harbor Perspec Biol 5: a009035, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Muller T, Hess MW, Schiefermeier N, Pfaller K, Ebner HL, Heinz-Erian P, Ponstingl H, Partsch J, Rollinghoff B, Kohler H, Berger T, Lenhartz H, Schlenck B, Houwen RJ, Taylor CJ, Zoller H, Lechner S, Goulet O, Utermann G, Ruemmele FM, Huber LA, Janecke AR. MYO5B mutations cause microvillus inclusion disease and disrupt epithelial cell polarity. Nat Genet 40: 1163–1165, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Namimatsu S, Ghazizadeh M, Sugisaki Y. Reversing the effects of formalin fixation with citraconic anhydride and heat: a universal antigen retrieval method. J Histochem Cytochem 53: 3–11, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Newton AC. Regulation of the ABC kinases by phosphorylation: protein kinase C as a paradigm. Biochem J 370: 361–371, 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ozu M, Toriano R, Capurro C, Parisi M. Electrical parameters and water permeability properties of monolayers formed by T84 cells cultured on permeable supports. Braz J Med Biol Res 38: 133–140, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Palfy M, Remenyi A, Korcsmaros T. Endosomal crosstalk: meeting points for signaling pathways. Trends Cell Biol 22: 447–456, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pasquali C, Fialka I, Huber LA. Subcellular fractionation, electromigration analysis and mapping of organelles. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci App 722: 89–102, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pellon-Cardenas O, Schweitzer J, D'Souza-Schorey C. Endocytic trafficking and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Curr Drug Targets 12: 1216–1222, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peterson MD, Bement WM, Mooseker MS. An in vitro model for the analysis of intestinal brush border assembly. II. Changes in expression and localization of brush border proteins during cell contact-induced brush border assembly in Caco-2BBe cells. J Cell Sc 105: 461–472, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pfannkuche H, Mauksch A, Gabel G. Modulation of electrogenic transport processes in the porcine proximal colon by enteric neurotransmitters. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 96: 482–493, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pohl JF, Shub MD, Trevelline EE, Ingebo K, Silber G, Rayhorn N, Holve S, Hu D. A cluster of microvillous inclusion disease in the Navajo population. J Pediatr 134: 103–106, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reinshagen K, Naim HY, Zimmer KP. Autophagocytosis of the apical membrane in microvillus inclusion disease. Gut 51: 514–521, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Remy L. The intracellular lumen: origin, role and implications of a cytoplasmic neostructure. Biol Cell 56: 97–105, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rexhepaj R, Artunc F, Grahammer F, Nasir O, Sandu C, Friedrich B, Kuhl D, Lang F. SGK1 is not required for regulation of colonic ENaC activity. Pflügers Arch 453: 97–105, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rexhepaj R, Rotte A, Pasham V, Gu S, Kempe DS, Lang F. PI3 kinase and PDK1 in the regulation of the electrogenic intestinal dipeptide transport. Cell Physiol Biochem 25: 715–722, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rhoads JM, Vogler RC, Lacey SR, Reddick RL, Keku EO, Azizkhan RG, Berschneider HM. Microvillus inclusion disease. In vitro jejunal electrolyte transport. Gastroenterology 100: 811–817, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ruemmele FM, Muller T, Schiefermeier N, Ebner HL, Lechner S, Pfaller K, Thoni CE, Goulet O, Lacaille F, Schmitz J, Colomb V, Sauvat F, Revillon Y, Canioni D, Brousse N, de Saint-Basile G, Lefebvre J, Heinz-Erian P, Enninger A, Utermann G, Hess MW, Janecke AR, Huber LA. Loss-of-function of MYO5B is the main cause of microvillus inclusion disease: 15 novel mutations and a CaCo-2 RNAi cell model. Hum Mutat 31: 544–551, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ruemmele FM, Schmitz J, Goulet O. Microvillous inclusion disease (microvillous atrophy) (Abstract). Orphanet J Rare Dis 1: 22, 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sakamori R, Das S, Yu S, Feng S, Stypulkowski E, Guan Y, Douard V, Tang W, Ferraris RP, Harada A, Brakebusch C, Guo W, Gao N. Cdc42 and Rab8a are critical for intestinal stem cell division, survival, and differentiation in mice. J Clin Invest 122: 1052–1065, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salas P, Rodriguez M, Viciana A, Vega-Salas D, Gauri H. The apical submembrane cytoskeleton participates in the organization of the apical pole in epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 137: 1–17, 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sandu C, Artunc F, Palmada M, Rexhepaj R, Grahammer F, Hussain A, Yun C, Alessi DR, Lang F. Impaired intestinal NHE3 activity in the PDK1 hypomorphic mouse. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 291: G868–G876, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sato T, Mushiake S, Kato Y, Sato K, Sato M, Takeda N, Ozono K, Miki K, Kubo Y, Tsuji A, Harada R, Harada A. The Rab8 GTPase regulates apical protein localization in intestinal cells. Nature 448: 366–369, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Suzuki A, Ohno S. The PAR-aPKC system: lessons in polarity. J Cell Sci 119: 979–987, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Talmon G, Holzapfel M, DiMaio DJ, Muirhead D. Rab11 is a useful tool for the diagnosis of microvillous inclusion disease. Int J Surg Pathol 20: 252–256, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Thoeni CE, Vogel GF, Tancevski I, Geley S, Lechner S, Pfaller K, Hess MW, Muller T, Janecke AR, Avitzur Y, Muise A, Cutz E, Huber LA. Microvillus inclusion disease: loss of myosin Vb disrupts intracellular traffic and cell polarity. Traffic 15: 22–42, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vega-Salas DE, Salas PJ, Rodriguez-Boulan E. Modulation of the expression of an apical plasma membrane protein of Madin-Darby canine kidney epithelial cells: cell-cell interactions control the appearance of a novel intracellular storage compartment. J Cell Biol 104: 1249–1259, 1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vega-Salas DE, San Martino JA, Salas PJ, Baldi A. Vacuolar apical compartment (VAC) in breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF-7 and T47D): failure of the cell-cell regulated exocytosis mechanism of apical membrane. Differentiation 54: 131–141, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wald FA, Forteza R, Diwadkar-Watkins R, Mashukova A, Duncan R, Abreu MT, Salas PJ. Aberrant expression of the polarity complex atypical PKC and non-muscle myosin IIA in active and inactive inflammatory bowel disease. Virchows Arch 459: 331–338, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wald FA, Oriolo AS, Mashukova A, Fregien NL, Langshaw AH, Salas PJ. Atypical protein kinase C (iota) activates ezrin in the apical domain of intestinal epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 121: 644–654, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Weisz OA, Rodriguez-Boulan E. Apical trafficking in epithelial cells: signals, clusters and motors. J Cell Sci 122: 4253–4266, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wilson JP. Surface area of the small intestine in man. Gut 8: 618–621, 1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yamanaka T, Horikoshi Y, Suzuki A, Sugiyama Y, Kitamura K, Maniwa R, Nagai Y, Yamashita A, Hirose T, Ishikawa H, Ohno S. PAR-6 regulates aPKC activity in a novel way and mediates cell-cell contact-induces formation of the epithelial junctional complex. Genes Cells 6: 721–731, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yoshihama Y, Sasaki K, Horikoshi Y, Suzuki A, Ohtsuka T, Hakuno F, Takahashi S, Ohno S, Chida K. KIBRA suppresses apical exocytosis through inhibition of aPKC kinase activity in epithelial cells. Curr Biol 21: 705–711, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zachos NC, Lee LJ, Kovbasnjuk O, Li X, Donowitz M. PLC-gamma directly binds activated c-Src, which is necessary for carbachol-mediated inhibition of NHE3 activity in Caco-2/BBe cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 305: C266–C275, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ziemba BP, Pilling C, Calleja V, Larijani B, Falke JJ. The PH domain of phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 exhibits a novel, phospho-regulated monomer-dimer equilibrium with important implications for kinase domain activation: single-molecule and ensemble studies. Biochemistry 52: 4820–4829, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







