Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2013 Dec 4;13:570. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-570

Neisseria gonorrhoeae and extended-spectrum cephalosporins in California: surveillance and molecular detection of mosaic penA

Severin Gose 1,, Duylinh Nguyen 1, Daniella Lowenberg 2,4, Michael Samuel 3, Heidi Bauer 3, Mark Pandori 1
PMCID: PMC4235022  PMID: 24305088

Abstract

Background

The spread of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with mosaic penA alleles and reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins is a major public health problem. While much work has been performed internationally, little is known about the genetics or molecular epidemiology of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins in the United States. The majority of N. gonorrhoeae infections are diagnosed without a live culture. Molecular tools capable of detecting markers of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance are needed.

Methods

Urethral N. gonorrhoeae isolates were collected from 684 men at public health clinics in California in 2011. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftriaxone, cefixime, cefpodoxime and azithromycin were determined by Etest and categorized according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control 2010 alert value breakpoints. 684 isolates were screened for mosaic penA alleles using real-time PCR (RTPCR) and 59 reactive isolates were subjected to DNA sequencing of their penA alleles and Neisseria gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST). To increase the specificity of the screening RTPCR in detecting isolates with alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs, the primers were modified to selectively amplify the mosaic XXXIV penA allele.

Results

Three mosaic penA alleles were detected including two previously described alleles (XXXIV, XXXVIII) and one novel allele (LA-A). Of the 29 isolates with an alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MIC, all possessed the mosaic XXXIV penA allele and 18 were sequence type 1407, an internationally successful strain associated with multi-drug resistance. The modified RTPCR detected the mosaic XXXIV penA allele in urethral isolates and urine specimens and displayed no amplification of the other penA alleles detected in this study.

Conclusion

N. gonorrhoeae isolates with mosaic penA alleles and reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins are currently circulating in California. Isolates with the same NG-MAST ST, penA allele and extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs have caused treatment failures elsewhere. The RTPCR assay presented here may be useful for the detection of N. gonorrheoae isolates and clinical specimens with reduced extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs in settings where antimicrobial susceptibility testing is unavailable. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance and decreasing culture capacity, molecular assays capable of detecting extended-spectrum cephalosporin of resistance are essential to public health.

Keywords: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Antimicrobial resistance, Extended-spectrum cephalosporin, Mosaic penA allele, Real-time polymerase chain reaction

Background

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is the second most commonly reported sexually transmitted infection in the United States [1]. N. gonorrhoeae has demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire resistance to all the first-line antimicrobials previously used including sulfanilamides, penicillins, tetracyclines, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones [2-7]. Currently, extended-spectrum cephalosporins are the only first-line antimicrobials recommended for the empirical treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea in many countries. In the United States, the prevalence of isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefixime (CFM) has resulted in dual treatment with ceftriaxone (CRO) plus azithromycin (AZM) or doxycycline being the only Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended treatment regimen [8]. N. gonorrhoeae strains with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins have been reported worldwide [9-19] and treatment failures with oral and injectable extended-spectrum cephalosporins have been reported in Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia and North America [20-29]. Recently, extensively-drug resistant N. gonorrhoeae strains have also been reported in Japan [17], France [23] and Spain [30] that displayed high-level resistance to CFM and CRO.

N. gonorrhoeae isolates with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins have been linked to altered penicillin-binding protein 2, encoded by the penA gene. These penA alleles were termed “mosaic” because their DNA sequence appears to have been formed through homologous recombination events with other Neisseria spp. that are naturally resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins [10]. In 2009, isolates with mosaic penA alleles (XXXIV, XXXVIII) were first described in the United States and were associated with reduced susceptibility to CFM in San Francisco isolates [18]. Neisseria gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) revealed that these isolates were sequence type (ST) 1407, which has since become a highly prevalent multi-drug resistant strain in Europe [31] and Japan [32].

In the US, surveillance of N. gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance is conducted by the CDC Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Program (GISP), which collects isolates from men presenting at public health clinics in 28 counties including four in California. Although extensive antimicrobial susceptibility testing data is collected about the phenotypic characteristics of these isolates [33,34], little is known about the genetics or molecular epidemiology of isolates with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins in the US. To investigate the association between strains harboring mosaic penA alleles and reduced extended-spectrum cephalosporin susceptibilities in California, N. gonorrhoeae isolates collected from the four California GISP sites in 2011 were analyzed. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to CRO, CFM, cefpodoxime (CPD) and AZM were determined by Etest and categorized according to the 2010 CDC alert value breakpoints [35]. Isolates were then screened for the presence of a mosaic penA allele using real-time PCR (RTPCR) [36] and reactive isolates were subjected to DNA sequencing of their penA alleles and NG-MAST.

Detecting N. gonorrhoeae strains with reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins is a challenge in the U.S. The vast majority of N. gonorrhoeae infections are diagnosed using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) methods where no live organism is available. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance and decreasing laboratory culture capacity, molecular assays capable of detecting markers of resistance are essential tools for public health surveillance. Therefore, we developed a novel RTPCR capable of specifically detecting the mosaic XXXIV penA allele and other closely related mosaic penA alleles that have been associated with extended-spectrum cephalosporin treatment failures [23,24,37] and validated its use on urethral isolates and clinical urine specimens.

Methods

Human subjects

Isolates and clinical specimens used in this study were collected for public heath surveillance and de-identified prior to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, thus this work was considered public health practice and was exempt from human subjects regulations [38]. This category of research is not considered human subjects research and is not subject to Institutional Review Board oversight.

Isolate and specimen collection

During 2011, urethral isolates (N = 684) were collected from men visiting public health clinics participating in GISP in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and Orange counties in California as described previously [39]. De-identified N. gonorrhoeae positive urine specimens matched to urethral isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele (N = 3), N. gonorrhoeae negative urine specimens (N = 24) and N. gonorrhoeae negative pharyngeal swab specimens (N = 20) were obtained from the San Francisco Department of Public Health Laboratory in 2012. Urethral isolates and matched urine specimens were collected during the same clinic visit.

Etest

Etest antimicrobial susceptibility testing was completed on 678 isolates for CRO, 351 isolates for CPD, 332 isolates for CFM and 682 isolates of AZM using chocolate agar as described previously [39]. The lower numbers of isolates tested by CFM and CPD resulted from a mid-year change to the testing protocol where CPD was replaced by CFM in the antimicrobial susceptibility testing panel.

Sample preparation

Isolates were prepared for penA DNA sequencing, RTPCR and NG-MAST by extracting DNA from 200 μL of liquid culture using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) on the automated QIAcube platform and were stored at -40°C until used. Clinical specimens were prepared for RTPCR by extracting DNA from 200 μL of the APTIMA specimen buffer using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit on the automated Qiacube platform and were stored at -40°C until used.

Quality control

For every Etest batch, two N. gonorrhoeae isolates with predetermined MICs were included as quality control strains. MICs for Etest control strains were determined through repeat testing by the SFDPH laboratory. The SF-2010-09-09 control strain was non-reactive by the screening RTPCR and had non-alert value MICs to all four antimicrobials (CRO = 0.016 μg/mL, CPD = 0.016 μg/mL, CFM = 0.016 μg/mL, AZM = 0.032 μg/mL). The SF-2009-11-07 control strain was reactive by the screening RTPCR, had the mosaic XXXIV penA allele and had alert value MICs to the three extended-spectrum cephalosporins, but not AZM (CRO = 0.125 μg/mL, CPD = 1.5 μg/mL, CFM = 0.19 μg/mL, AZM = 0.032 μg/mL). Etest batches passed quality control if the MICs for both control strains were within ± 1 log2 of the predetermined MIC. For every RTPCR batch, extracted DNA from the SF-2009-11-07 was used as a positive control and a negative water control was included.

Detection of mosaic penA alleles

A TaqMan RTPCR was used to detect penA alleles with the mosaic structure as described previously [36]. Briefly, 5 μL of extracted DNA from each isolate was used as the template in a 20 uL reaction mix containing LightCycler FastStart DNA Master HybProbe master mix (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and 1 uM, 250 nM and 5 mM of primers, probe and MgCl2, respectively. Primers and probe used are shown in Table 1. The following amplification conditions were used: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 60 s at 60°C. The samples were analyzed on a Roche LightCycler 2.0 and were declared positive if their curves rose above 2.0 fluorescence before cycle 35. RTPCR crossing points, the cycle at which the sample’s fluorescence rises above background, were automatically calculated using the Roche LightCycler 2.0 software package and the absolute quantitation setting.

Table 1.

Oligonucleotides used for RTPCR and amplification and sequencing of penA, por and tbpB

Primer DNA sequence
Ochiai RTPCR forward
5′-GTTGGATGCCCGTACTGGG-3′
Ochiai RTPCR reverse
5′-ACCGATTTTGTAAGGCAGGG-3′
Ochiai RTPCR probea
5′-CGGCAAAGTGGATGCAACCGA-3′
Modified RTPCR forward
5′-TCAATACGCCTGCCTATGAG-3′
Modified RTPCR reverse
5′-GCACATCCAAAGTAGGATAAACG-3′
por forward
5′-CAAGAAGACCTCGGCAA-3′
por reverse
5′-CCGACAACCACTTGGT-3′
tbpB forward
5′-CGTTGTCGGCAGCGCGAAAAC-3′
tbpB reverse
5′-TTCATCGGTGCGCTCGCCTTG-3′
penA forward 1st half
5′-GCATCAGGATAATAATAACGAGAAG-3′
penA reverse 1st half
5′-TGTAAGGCAGGGTATTGAAT-3′
penA forward 2nd half
5′-GTTGGATGCCCGTACTGGG-3′
penA reverse 2nd half 5′-CAGCCAAAGGGGTTAACTTGCTGAAC-3′

aCovalently bonded to a 5-6-carboxyfluorescein-3-6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine fluorophore.

PenA DNA sequencing

Isolates reactive by the screening RTPCR were subjected to penA DNA sequencing as described previously [18]. Briefly, 5 μL of extracted DNA from each isolate was used as the template in a 20 μL reaction mix using LightCycler FastStart DNA Master HybProbe master mix (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The penA gene was sequenced in two pieces with one amplification reaction covering the first half of the gene and another amplification reaction covering the second half. The primers used are shown in Table 1. The samples were analyzed on a Roche LightCycler 2.0 and the amplification products were purified using the QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) on the automated Qiacube platform. Sequencing was completed by MCLAB Inc. (South San Francisco, CA) and Elim Biopharmaceuticals (Hayward, CA) using the same primers that were used for amplification.

NG-MAST

The por and tbpB genes from isolates with alert value cephalosporin MICs were amplified and sequenced as described previously [40]. Briefly, 5 μL of extracted DNA from each isolate was used as the template in a 20 uL reaction mix containing LightCycler FastStart DNA Master HybProbe master mix (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The samples were analyzed on a Roche LightCycler 2.0 and the amplification products were purified using the QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) on the automated Qiacube platform. Sequencing was completed by MCLAB (South San Francisco, CA) and Elim Biopharmaceuticals (Hayward, CA) using the same primers that were used for amplification. NG-MAST sequence types (STs) were obtained by uploading trimmed sequences to the NG-MAST database at http://www.ng-mast.net.

Detection of mosaic XXXIV penA alelle

A modified TaqMan RTPCR was developed to specifically amplify the mosaic XXXIV penA allele. The mosaic XXXIV, CI [23], XXXIV with T534A amino acid alteration [24] and X [37]penA alleles share sequence identity in the region detected by the modified RTPCR (bp 836 – bp 1066). Amplification specificity was accomplished by designing the forward primer with internal mismatches and a terminal 3′ mismatch to prevent the amplification of mosaic penA alleles detected in this study that were not associated with alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs (XXXVIII, LA-A) [see multiple sequence alignment shown in Additional file 1]. The reaction conditions used were identical to the screening RTPCR. Primers and probe used are shown in Table 1. Urine specimens (N = 27) and pharyngeal swab specimens (N = 20) were tested using the APTIMA Combo 2 (Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA) to determine whether N. gonorrhoeae was present prior to testing by the modified RTPCR.

Data analysis

Isolates with alert value MICs were classified according to the 2010 CDC GISP alert value breakpoints, which were 0.125, 0.25, 0.25, and 2.0 μg/mL for CRO, CPD, CFM and AZM respectively [35]. For this study, penA genotypes were defined by 100% identity at the nucleotide sequence level. DNA sequences were trimmed and aligned using MEGA 5.05 and the TeXshade package in LaTeX. All sequences presented in this study are publicly available through Genbank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank). Genbank accession numbers for mosaic penA alleles XXXIV, XXXVIII, LA-A and wild-type (LM306) are [Genbank:GU723422], [Genbank:HQ204565], [Genbank:KC192769] and [Genbank:M32091], respectively.

Results

Phenotypic surveillance of 684 isolates collected in 2011

Overall, 15/678 isolates displayed alert value CRO MICs, 21/351 isolates displayed alert value CPD MICs and 2/682 isolates displayed alert value AZM MICs. No isolates with an alert value CFM MIC were observed and both isolates with alert value AZM MICs had extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs below the alert value breakpoints.

Genotypic surveillance of mosaic penA alleles in 684 isolates collected in 2011

Overall, 59/684 isolates were reactive by the screening RTPCR, indicating the presence of a mosaic penA allele. DNA sequencing revealed that 39 isolates possessed the mosaic XXXIV penA allele, four isolates possessed the mosaic XXXVIII penA allele and sixteen isolates possessed a novel mosaic penA allele that will be referred to as LA-A. Of isolates reactive by the screening RTPCR, 15/59 displayed an alert value CRO MIC and 21/59 displayed an alert value CPD MIC.

Figure 1 shows a full length multiple alignment of the translated amino acid sequences of mosaic penA alleles detected in this study. The mosaic XXXIV penA allele has all three amino acid changes (I312M, V316T, and G545S) that have previously been associated with reduced susceptibility to oral extended-spectrum cephalosporins [37,41]. The mosaic XXXVIII and LA-A penA alleles both have two of these three amino acid changes (I312M, V316T). None of the mosaic penA alleles found in this study have the recently described amino acid change (A501P) found in the mosaic CI penA allele from an extensively-drug resistant gonococcal strain that displayed high level resistance to both CFM and CRO [23,30].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Multiple alignment of translated amino acid sequences of mosaic penA alleles. Comparison of the translated amino acid sequences for isolates with mosaic penA alleles detected in this study (XXXIV, XXXVIII and LA-A) to the wild-type sequence (LM306). Boxed residues represent amino acid changes associated with reduced susceptibility to oral extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

Association of the mosaic XXXIV penA allele with alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs

Figure 2 shows box plots of MIC distributions by penA genotype. The mosaic XXXIV penA allele was associated with elevated MICs for all three extended-spectrum cephalosporins, although for CRO and CFM, the majority of MICs remained below the alert value breakpoints. Of isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele, 15/39 displayed an alert value CRO MIC and 21/24 displayed an alert value CPD MIC. All isolates with the mosaic XXXVIII, mosaic LA-A and non-reactive penA alleles had non-alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs. Both isolates that displayed alert value AZM MICs were non-reactive by the screening RTPCR and had non-alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Box plots of MIC distributions by penA genotype. N = 678, 351, 332 and 682 for CRO, CPD, CFM and AZM respectively. Boxes indicate the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. Whiskers indicate the lowest datum within 1.5 IQR of the lower quartile, and the highest datum within 1.5 IQR of the upper quartile. Outliers are shown as gray circles. Gray horizontal bars indicate the alert value breakpoint for each antimicrobial.

NG-MAST of 59 isolates with mosaic penA alleles

Table 2 shows the por alleles, tbpB alleles and NG-MAST sequence types (STs) of isolates with a mosaic penA allele. Of the 39 isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele, 24 were ST1407 (tbpB 110, por 908). In isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele and STs other than ST1407, tbpB allele 110 was found in every isolate except one, which had the closely related tbpB allele 1431 (99.5% sequence identity with tbpB 110). Of the four isolates with the mosaic XXXVIII penA allele, all were ST1407. Of the 16 isolates with the mosaic LA-A penA allele, 10 were ST7268 (tbpB 18, por 4340). In isolates with the mosaic LA-A penA allele and STs other then 7268, tbpB allele 18 was found in three isolates, one isolate had tbpB allele 1429 (93.1% sequence identity with tbpB 18) and one isolate had tbpB allele 1430 (94.6% sequence identity with tbpB 18).

Table 2.

NG-MAST sequence types of isolates with a mosaic penA allele in California

Total no. No. CRO alert a penA genotype tbpB allele por allele NG-MAST ST
24
10
XXXIV
110
908
1407
1
0
XXXIV
110
1388
2212
2
0
XXXIV
110
1903
3149
1
1
XXXIV
110
2622
4275
1
0
XXXIV
110
2684
4378
1
0
XXXIV
110
3424
5643
4
0
XXXIV
110
2700
5895
1
1
XXXIV
110
3669
6200
2
2
XXXIV
110
4544
7560
1
0
XXXIV
110
4599
7647
1
1
XXXIV
1431b
1900
7566
4
0
XXXVIII
110
908
1407
10
0
LA-A
18
4340
7268
2
0
LA-A
18
4546
7564
1
0
LA-A
18
4545
7646
1
0
LA-A
81c
4340
7561
1
0
LA-A
1429d
4340
7562
1 0 LA-A 1430e 4547 7565

aCRO alert value MIC ≥ 0.125 μg/mL.

btbpB allele 1431 is 2 bp different from tbpB allele 110.

ctbpB allele 81 is 27 bp different from tbpB allele 18.

dtbpB allele 1429 is 1 bp different from tbpB allele 18.

etbpB allele 1430 is 21 bp different from tbpB allele 18.

Modified RTPCR for the detection of the mosaic XXXIV penA allele

Table 3 shows results of the modified RTPCR performance in detecting the mosaic penA XXXIV allele in a validation panel of 71 N. gonorrhoeae isolates, 27 urine specimens and 20 pharyngeal swab specimens. The modified RTPCR was reactive in 39/39 urethral isolates containing the mosaic XXXIV penA allele and 3/3 urine specimens that were matched to urethral isolates possessing the mosaic XXXIV penA allele. No reactivity was seen in isolates with the mosaic XXXVIII, LA-A or penA alleles non-reactive by the screening RTPCR. All N. gonorrhoeae negative urine specimens and pharyngeal swab clinical specimens were also non-reactive. Based upon testing of the validation panel of 71 isolates, the sensitivity and specificity of the modified RTPCR in detecting alert value CRO MICs were 100% and 57% respectively.

Table 3.

Isolates and clinical specimens tested with the modified RTPCR

Specimen type Total no. No. CRO alert a Source penA genotype b NAAT result c RTPCR result d
Isolate
39
15
Urethral
XXXIV
+
+
 
6
0
Urethral
XXXVIII
+
-
 
6
0
Urethral
LA-A
+
-
 
20
0
Urethral
Non-reactive
+
-
Clinical Specimen
3
ND
Urine
XXXIV
+
+
 
24
ND
Urine
ND
-
-
  20 ND Pharynx ND - -

aCRO alert value MIC ≥ 0.125 μg/mL.

bND = Not determined.

cTested by APTIMA Combo 2.

dTested by the modified RTPCR presented in this study.

Discussion

N. gonorrhoeae has an extensive history of antimicrobial resistance and has demonstrated that it is capable of utilizing a variety of mechanisms to escape antimicrobial pressure. Extended-spectrum cephalosporins have been the CDC recommended treatment only since 2007, but it appears that their usefulness is already on the decline. In 2010, the CDC issued treatment guidelines recommending dual therapy with CFM plus AZM or doxycyline due to concerns about increasing antimicrobial resistance. In 2012, the CDC again updated its recommendations and abandoned oral extended-spectrum cephalosporins in favor of dual therapy with CRO plus AZM or doxycycline. The data here support this recommendation since no isolates were found with alert value MICs to both AZM and an extended-spectrum cephalosporin. Two isolates with alert value MICs to AZM were detected in San Francisco and San Diego, however, so the emergence of dual-resistant strains in California remains a possibility.

Three mosaic penA alleles were detected in this study and a novel one was identified. The mosaic XXXIV and XXXVIII penA alleles were both previously detected in San Francisco in 2009 [18], while the LA-A penA allele is novel. The mosaic XXXIV penA allele has all three amino acid changes previously associated with reduced susceptibility to oral extended-spectrum cephalosporins [37]. Homology modeling studies have shown that these amino acid changes result in conformational alterations of the β-lactam-binding pocket and affect the ability of extended-spectrum cephalosporins to bind, particularly those with large R groups [42]. More recently, it has been shown that these amino acid changes are epistatic and only result in higher MICs in the context of other mutational changes in penA[41]. Although the mosaic XXXVIII and LA-A penA alleles both have two of these amino acid changes, the distributions of extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs for isolates with these penA alleles were similar to those with non-reactive penA alleles. These data support the hypothesis that the I312M and V316T amino acid changes act synergistically with the G545S amino acid change and that they are necessary, but not sufficient, to produce elevated oral extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs.

The mosaic XXXIV penA allele detected in this study is concerning because it was found in isolates with extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs that have been reported in isolates associated with treatment failures. Since first being published in 2009, the mosaic XXXIV penA allele has been found worldwide and is now associated with ST1407 strains and reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. A pharyngeal ST1407 isolate with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele recently caused a CRO treatment failure in Slovenia [29] and strains with closely related mosaic penA alleles have caused treatment failures in France (mosaic CI) [23], Austria (mosaic XXXIV with T534A amino acid alteration) [24] and Hong Kong (mosaic X) [37]. The mosaic XXXIV penA allele is only a single amino acid change (A501P) different from the mosaic CI penA allele described in extensively-drug resistant isolates from France and Spain that exhibited high-level resistance to both oral and injectable extended-spectrum cephalosporins [23,30]. This additional mutation might be capable of increasing CRO MICs from the elevated levels seen in this study (CRO MIC = 0.094-0.25 μg/mL) to levels at which CRO treatment failures have occurred even with much higher 1 g doses (CRO MIC = 1.0-2.0 μg/mL) [38]. The extensively-drug resistant isolates described in France and Spain were also ST1407, indicating a genetically similar background. It is possible, however, that determinants of resistance other than penA also affect the extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs observed.

In 2009, the mosaic XXXIV and XXXVIII penA alleles were described only in ST1407 isolates and a very closely related isolate (ST1513, tbpB 110, por 971, 99.8% similar to por 908) in San Francisco and appeared to be spreading in a clonal fashion. The mosaic XXXVIII penA allele has remained clonal within ST1407 in California, while the mosaic XXXIV penA allele was found in 10 STs other than ST1407 in 2011. In isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele and STs other than ST1407, the tbpB allele was the same as ST1407 (tbpB allele 110) or was a closely related tbpB allele (tbpB allele 1431, 99.5% similar to tbpB 110). ST1407 remains the dominant ST associated with reduced extended-spectrum cephalosporin susceptibilities in California, but strains with unrelated STs now carry the mosaic XXXIV penA allele. Genomic mapping of ST1407 and ST5895 isolates from San Francisco recently detailed the transfer of the mosaic XXXIV penA allele into a completely different genetic background [43]. In this study, four ST5895 isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele were found in Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego, indicating that this strain is likely circulating throughout California. Unfortunately, the horizontal spread of the mosaic XXXIV penA allele into new STs makes tracking the spread of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance with NG-MAST problematic.

Of note is the fact that the mosaic XXXIV penA allele was only found in isolates with tbpB allele 110 or a very closely related allele (tbpB 1431, 99.6% similar to tbpB allele 110). In the N. gonorrhoeae genome, penA is located ~50 kb downstream of tbpB. The linkage between these two loci likely explains the high level of clonality of tbpB alleles in isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele. The linkage between penA and tbpB was also evident in isolates with the mosaic LA-A penA allele where 13/16 isolates had tbpB 18.

Detecting strains with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins is a challenge in the U.S. The vast majority of N. gonorrhoeae infections are diagnosed using nucleic acid-based methods where no live organism is present. Without a culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, molecular assays are currently the only option available for detecting isolates with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. The modified RTPCR presented here is a simple and rapid tool capable of specifically detecting isolates or urine specimens that may have alert value extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs. The assay may find utility in the surveillance and epidemiological investigation of strains with reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

This assay, however, has several limitations. The mosaic penA alleles which the assay was designed to discriminate between were detected in California in 2011. It is possible that other mosaic penA alleles are circulating elsewhere that produce elevated extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs, but do not share the region of sequence identity that the modified RTPCR detects. Also, the modified RTPCR should be used with caution on pharyngeal specimens because of the potential for cross-reactivity with penA alleles from other Neisseria spp. The assay performed well on N. gonorrhoeae positive urine specimens matched to isolates with the mosaic XXXIV penA allele, but only a small number of specimens were available for testing.

The main limitation of this study is the sampling strategy used to collect N. gonorrhoeae isolates. The samples were collected in parallel with the CDC GISP which collects isolates only from men. Additionally, the samples were collected from public health clinics whose populations may not be representative of the general population and are known to oversample MSM [44]. Since MSM populations have historically been associated with higher rates of antimicrobial resistance, it is possible that these data overestimate the prevalence of alert value isolates in the general population [34]. Another limitation was the use of RTPCR to screen isolates for the presence of a mosaic penA allele. The screening RTPCR detected a region of shared sequence identity found in many mosaic penA alleles, but it is possible that other mosaic alleles were present that are non-reactive with this assay.

Conclusion

In conclusion, N. gonorrhoeae isolates with mosaic penA alleles and reduced susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins are currently circulating in California. Isolates with the same NG-MAST ST, penA allele and extended-spectrum cephalosporin MICs have caused verified treatment failures elsewhere. Enhanced surveillance efforts such as the use of the molecular assays to detect resistance determinants and the implementation of test of cure protocols will be necessary to ensure that empirical treatment remains effective.

Abbreviations

AZM: Azithromycin; CDC: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CFM: Cefixime; CPD: Cefpodoxime; CRO: Ceftriaxone; GISP: Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Program; MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; NAAT: Nucleic acid amplification test; NG-MAST: Neisseria gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing; RTPCR: Real-time polymerase chain reaction; ST: Sequence type.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SG completed the antimicrobial susceptibility testing, RTPCR screening, penA DNA sequencing, NG-MAST, developed and validated the modified RTPCR and prepared the manuscript. DN assisted with NG-MAST and validation of the modified RTPCR. DL assisted with NG-MAST. MS and HB consulted on the project and manuscript preparation. MP directed the project and consulted on the manuscript preparation and modified RTPCR design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/570/prepub

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

Multiple alignment of bp 791 – bp 1110 of the mosaic penA alleles detected in this study. The locations of the primers and probe for both the screening and modified RTPCRs are shown. The modified forward primer specifically amplifies the mosaic XXXIV penA allele due to the internal mismatches and terminal 3′ mismatch with the other penA alleles detected in this study.

Click here for file (76.6KB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Severin Gose, Email: severin.gose@sfdph.org.

Duylinh Nguyen, Email: duylinh.nguyen@sfdph.org.

Daniella Lowenberg, Email: daniella.lowenberg@gmail.com.

Michael Samuel, Email: michael.samuel@cdph.ca.gov.

Heidi Bauer, Email: heidi.bauer@cdph.ca.gov.

Mark Pandori, Email: mark.pandori@sfdph.org.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Summary of notifiable diseases: United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;58:1–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolan GA, Sparling PF, Wasserheit JN. The Emerging Threat of Untreatable Gonococcal Infection. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:485–487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1112456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirkcaldy RD, Ballard RC, Dowell D. Gonococcal resistance: are cephalosporins next? Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13:196–204. doi: 10.1007/s11908-011-0169-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewis DA. The Gonococcus fights back: is this time a knock out? Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86:415–421. doi: 10.1136/sti.2010.042648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tapsall JW, Ndowa F, Lewis DA, Unemo M. Meeting the public health challenge of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7:821–834. doi: 10.1586/eri.09.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Unemo M, Shafer WM. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: origin, evolution, and lessons learned for the future. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1230:E19–E28. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06215.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barry PM, Klausner JD. The use of cephalosporins for gonorrhea: the impending problem of resistance. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10:555–577. doi: 10.1517/14656560902731993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Workowski KA, Berman S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep Cent Dis Control. 2010;59:1–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Allen VG, Farrell DJ, Rebbapragada A, Tan J, Tijet N, Perusini SJ, Towns L, Lo S, Low DE, Melano RG. Molecular Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms in Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates from Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:703–712. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00788-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ameyama S, Onodera S, Takahata M, Minami S, Maki N, Endo K, Goto H, Suzuki H, Oishi Y. Mosaic-Like Structure of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 Gene (penA) in Clinical Isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with Reduced Susceptibility to Cefixime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:3744–3749. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3744-3749.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cole MJ, Unemo M, Hoffmann S, Chisholm SA, Ison CA, van de Laar MJ. The European gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programme, 2009. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2011;16:19995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Golparian D, Hellmark B, Fredlund H, Unemo M. Emergence, spread and characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with in vitro decreased susceptibility and resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins in Sweden. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86:454–460. doi: 10.1136/sti.2010.045377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ito M, Deguchi T, Mizutani K-S, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito S-I, Takahashi Y, Ishihara S, Kawamura Y, Ezaki T. Emergence and Spread of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Clinical Isolates Harboring Mosaic-Like Structure of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 in Central Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:137–143. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.137-143.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindberg R, Fredlund H, Nicholas R, Unemo M. Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates with Reduced Susceptibility to Cefixime and Ceftriaxone: Association with Genetic Polymorphisms in penA, mtrR, porB1b, and ponA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:2117–2122. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01604-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin I, Jayaraman G, Wong T, Liu G, Gilmour M. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Canada: 2000–2009. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:892–898. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822c664f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martin I, Sawatzky P, Allen V, Hoang L, Lefebvre B, Mina N, Wong T, Gilmour M. Emergence and characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibilities to ceftriaxone and cefixime in Canada: 2001–2010. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39:316–323. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182401b69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohnishi M, Golparian D, Shimuta K, Saika T, Hoshina S, Iwasaku K, Nakayama S, Kitawaki J, Unemo M. Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea?: detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3538–3545. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00325-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pandori M, Barry PM, Wu A, Ren A, Whittington WLH, Liska S, Klausner JD. Mosaic penicillin-binding protein 2 in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates collected in 2008 in San Francisco, California. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4032–4034. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00406-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yokoi S, Deguchi T, Ozawa T, Yasuda M, Ito S, Kubota Y, Tamaki M, Maeda S. Threat to cefixime treatment for gonorrhea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1275–1277. doi: 10.3201/eid1308.060948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ison CA, Hussey J, Sankar KN, Evans J, Alexander S. Gonorrhoea treatment failures to cefixime and azithromycin in England, 2010. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2011;16:19833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lo JYC, Ho KM, Leung AOC, Tiu FST, Tsang GKL, Lo ACT, Tapsall JW. Ceftibuten Resistance and Treatment Failure of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3564–3567. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00198-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Unemo M, Golparian D, Hestner A. Ceftriaxone treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by international recommendations, Sweden, July 2010. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2011;16:19792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Unemo M, Golparian D, Nicholas R, Ohnishi M, Gallay A, Sednaoui P. High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in France: novel penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1273–1280. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05760-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Unemo M, Golparian D, Stary A, Eigentler A. First Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with resistance to cefixime causing gonorrhoea treatment failure in Austria, 2011. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2011;16:19998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Unemo M, Golparian D, Syversen G, Vestrheim DF, Moi H. Two cases of verified clinical failures using internationally recommended first-line cefixime for gonorrhoea treatment, Norway, 2010. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2010;15:19721. doi: 10.2807/ese.15.47.19721-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Allen VG, Mitterni L, Seah C, Rebbapragada A, Martin IE, Lee C, Siebert H, Towns L, Melano RG, Low DE. Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure and susceptibility to cefixime in Toronto, Canada. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2013;309:163–170. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.176575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewis DA, Sriruttan C, Müller EE, Golparian D, Gumede L, Fick D, de Wet J, Maseko V, Coetzee J, Unemo M. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the first two cases of extended-spectrum-cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in South Africa and association with cefixime treatment failure. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1267–1270. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tapsall J, Read P, Carmody C, Bourne C, Ray S, Limnios A, Sloots T, Whiley D. Two cases of failed ceftriaxone treatment in pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by molecular microbiological methods. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(Pt 5):683–687. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.007641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Unemo M, Golparian D, Potočnik M, Jeverica S. Treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with internationally recommended first-line ceftriaxone verified in Slovenia, September 2011. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2012;17:20200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cámara J, Serra J, Ayats J, Bastida T, Carnicer-Pont D, Andreu A, Ardanuy C. Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1858–1860. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chisholm SA, Unemo M, Quaye N, Johansson E, Cole MJ, Ison CA, Van de Laar MJ. Molecular epidemiological typing within the European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Programme reveals predominance of a multidrug-resistant clone. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2013;18:20358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shimuta K, Unemo M, Nakayama S-I, Morita-Ishihara T, Dorin M, Kawahata T, Ohnishi M. on behalf of the Antibiotic-Resistant Gonorrhea Study Group. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular typing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Kyoto and Osaka, Japan in 2010–2012 -- intensified surveillance after identification of the first high-level ceftriaxone resistant strain H041. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;11:5225–5232. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01295-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cephalosporin susceptibility among Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates--United States, 2000–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:873–877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kirkcaldy RD, Zaidi A, Hook EW 3rd, Holmes KH, Soge O, del Rio C, Hall G, Papp J, Bolan G, Weinstock HS. Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance among men who have sex with men and men who have sex exclusively with women: the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2005–2010. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 1):321–328. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Gonorrhea - STD information from CDC [WWW Document], 2010. URL http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/ (accessed 11.14.13)
  36. Ochiai S, Ishiko H, Yasuda M, Deguchi T. Rapid detection of the mosaic structure of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae penA gene, which is associated with decreased susceptibilities to oral cephalosporins. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1804–1810. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01800-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Takahata S, Senju N, Osaki Y, Yoshida T, Ida T. Amino acid substitutions in mosaic penicillin-binding protein 2 associated with reduced susceptibility to cefixime in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3638–3645. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00626-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hodge JG. An Enhanced Approach to Distinguishing Public Health Practice and Human Subjects Research. J Law Med Ethics. 2005;33:125–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gose S, Kong CJ, Lee Y, Samuel MC, Bauer HM, Dixon P, Soge OO, Lei J, Pandori M. Comparison of Neisseria gonorrhoeae MICs obtained by Etest and agar dilution for ceftriaxone, cefpodoxime, cefixime and azithromycin. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;95:379–380. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Martin IMC, Ison CA, Aanensen DM, Fenton KA, Spratt BG. Rapid sequence-based identification of gonococcal transmission clusters in a large metropolitan area. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:1497–1505. doi: 10.1086/383047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Unemo M, Nicholas RA. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:1401–1422. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Osaka K, Takakura T, Narukawa K, Takahata M, Endo K, Kiyota H, Onodera S. Analysis of amino acid sequences of penicillin-binding protein 2 in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cefixime and ceftriaxone. J Infect Chemother Off J Jpn Soc Chemother. 2008;14:195–203. doi: 10.1007/s10156-008-0610-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hess D, Wu A, Golparian D, Esmaili S, Pandori W, Sena E, Klausner JD, Barry P, Unemo M, Pandori M. Genome sequencing of a Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolate of a successful international clone with decreased susceptibility and resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5633–5641. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00636-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) GISP Profiles, 2011 - Figure C. Percentage Of Gisp Participants Identifying As Men Who Have Sex With Men. [WWW Document], 2011. URL http://www.cdc.gov/STd/gisp2011/figC.html (accessed 11.14.13)

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1

Multiple alignment of bp 791 – bp 1110 of the mosaic penA alleles detected in this study. The locations of the primers and probe for both the screening and modified RTPCRs are shown. The modified forward primer specifically amplifies the mosaic XXXIV penA allele due to the internal mismatches and terminal 3′ mismatch with the other penA alleles detected in this study.

Click here for file (76.6KB, pdf)

Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES