Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2014 Apr 18;4(6):563–578. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0218-9

Genomic profile of the plants with pharmaceutical value

Saikat Gantait 1,2,, Sandip Debnath 3, Md Nasim Ali 4
PMCID: PMC4235889  PMID: 28324311

Abstract

There is an ample genetic diversity of plants with medicinal importance around the globe and this pool of genetic variation serves as the base for selection as well as for plant improvement. Thus, identification, characterization and documentation of the gene pool of medicinal plants are essential for this purpose. Genomic information of many a medicinal plant species has increased rapidly since the past decade and genetic resources available for domestication and improvement programs include genome sequencing, expressed sequence tags sequencing, transcript profiling, gene transmit, molecular markers in favor of mapping and breeding. In recent years, multiple endeavors have been undertaken for genomic characterization of medicinal plant species with the aid of molecular markers for sustainable utilization of gene pool, its conservation and future studies. Recent advancement in genomics is so fast that only some researches have been published till date and to a large extent documentation is restricted to electronic resources. Whole genome profiling of the identified medicinal plant species, carried out by several researchers, based on the DNA fingerprinting, is well documented in the present review. This review will facilitate preparing a database of the widely used, economically important medicinal plant species, based on their genomic organization.

Keywords: AFLP, ESTs, Molecular marker, Polymerase chain reaction, RAPD, RFLP, SNP, SSR, DNA barcoding

Introduction

In recent years, there has been a renewed awareness observed all over the world, concerning natural medicines that are extracted from plant parts. In this respect, 40 % or more of the pharmaceuticals used by the Western countries, at present, are the derivative of natural resources. Quite an impressive and substantial number of plant species have already been well described in detail, in Ayurveda, the original indigenous system of Indian medicine (Mukherjee and Wahile 2006). Amidst its diverse climatic zones, India has a wealth of medicinal herbs with immense diversity. The forests harbor a large number of plant species, but deforestation has been solely accountable for the rapid loss of the said natural wealth to such an extent that numerous important medicinal plants are now endangered and under the risk of extinction. Pharmaceutical companies rely mostly upon materials obtained from plants growing in their natural habitats that are being depleted in an alarming rate. It is well documented that, use of medicinal herbs and trees is increasing with a skyrocketing speed every day. A large-scale commercial utilization of these Genuses is speculated here and it calls for a proportionate involvement of modern day crop improvement methods for genetic betterment of the plants described earlier. It must be admitted that, modern day crop improvement is moving towards a new platform of genomics. The advantages of genomics have already been well harvested in different field crops. So, the present review has been documented and fashioned on the scope of genomics on genetic improvement of plants having medicinal value. There are several reports available on molecular markers of different medicinal plants. Genetic markers in plants consist of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (Hyten et al. 2010; Myles et al. 2010; Arai-Kichise et al. 2011; Barbazuk and Schnable 2011; Marroni et al. 2011) and microsatellites (SSR, simple sequence repeats; short tandem repeats) (Csencsics et al. 2010; Buehler et al. 2011; Delmas et al. 2011; Gardner et al. 2011; Michalczyk et al. 2011). These molecular markers are employed for genome mapping and the invention of disease-associated alleles, along with population mapping, and forensics, the analysis of germplasm, trait mapping, and marker-assisted selection in plant breeding and others (Appleby et al. 2009). Several assays have been developed for high-throughput genotyping in plants using these markers (Appleby et al. 2009; Jones et al. 2009). Genomic polymorphisms can also be wrapped up for validation of identity of species, devoid of prior sequence information, by means of sequence-independent array technology (Niu et al. 2011; Jayasinghe et al. 2009). Nonetheless, NGS is fast becoming the alternative technique for the characterization of genetic markers (Myles et al. 2010; Marroni et al. 2011; Elshire et al. 2011; Arai-Kichise et al. 2011; Deschamps and Campbell 2010) and the unambiguous detection of multiple alleles of homologous loci in polyploid plants (Griffin et al. 2011). Despite the escalating use of DNA sequence-based approaches, yet fingerprinting techniques persist to be exploited for genomic profiling of medicinal plants (Zhou et al. 2008; Kumar et al. 2007; Techen et al. 2010; Xue and Xue 2008; Qiu et al. 2009; Diao et al. 2009; Ruzicka et al. 2009; Tamhankar et al. 2009; Gupta et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2009; Li et al. 2009). A remarkable and unique progress is the utilization of real-time PCR for the quantitation of amplified markers (Xue and Xue 2008), which should facilitate the determination of the degree of adulterant contamination in primary samples.

Impact of molecular marker techniques

Through the introduction of molecular markers, it is currently feasible to create straight inferences in relation to genetic divergence and inter-relationships amongst organisms at DNA level, devoid of the misleading environmental influences or imperfect pedigree accounts. Genetic assessment of plant populations and species, for taxonomic, evolutionary, and ecological research, has been immensely assisted from the advancement of a range of molecular marker systems. Even though every molecular marker system is derived from distinctive principles, yet their function is to expose the genome-wide variability. An evident difficulty that typically arises is as to how to select the apposite DNA marker amid the countless marker systems. Overall, the preference of a molecular marker system should be conciliated between consistency and simplicity of analysis, statistical rule, and assurance of exposing polymorphisms. Molecular systems are helpful in characterization of genetic divergence amongst several cultivars or species for the evaluation of genetic fidelity, identifying genes of commercial and agronomic interests, and enhancement via genetic transformation system. Su et al. (2008) reported the development of strain-specific sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers for strain detection and authentication of Ganoderma lucidum. Balasubramani et al. (2011) developed DNA markers from the genomic DNA through amplification and sequencing of the whole internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1, 5.8S rRNA and ITS2). They also established that the use of universal primers proved to be efficient and reliable in authenticating Berberis species. These primers are functional as a molecular pharmacognostic means in quality assessment of raw drugs. In an altogether different approach, Wang et al. (2012) employed the methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) marker to appraise cytosine methylation difference in several regenerated plantlets and among organs of Clivia miniata. Wiriyakarun et al. (2013) reported the utilization of polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) to recognize plant origin of Pueraria candollei, Butea superb and Mucuna collettii. Nevertheless, to develop marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding (for example in Catharanthus roseus) Chaudhary et al. (2013) reported the detection and mapping of QTLs, affecting pharmaceutical alkaloid contents in leaf and root. Some of the important achievements completed in medicinal plant species through molecular approaches are described in Tables 1, 2, and 3. Detection of genetic variation is also imperative for micropropagation and in vitro germplasm conservation to eradicate unwanted somaclonal variations. Somaclonal variations take place in reaction to the in vitro stresses and are manifested in the form of DNA methylation, chromosome reorganizations, and point mutations (Phillips et al. 1994). Therefore, a quality test for true-to-type planting material at an early stage of development is reflected to be helpful for in vitro culture. Molecular markers provide a significant tool to verify the genetic consistency and to test the true-to-type character of in vitro regenerated plants.

Table 1.

Employment of RAPD markers in molecular characterization of medicinal plants

Medicinal plant species Achievements References
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Detection of genetic variability Amarger and Mercier (1995)
Afgekia sericea Craib Genetic diversity within and among Thai populations Prathepha and Baimai (1999)
Mentha species Assessment of genetic relationships in 11 accessions from six taxa of Mentha developed by CIMAP Khanuja et al. (2000)
Dioscorea floribunda Detection of genetic alteration in the post-cryo regenerated plants Ahuja et al. (2002)
Panax sikkimensis,P. pseudoginseng and P. quinquefolium Genetic and metabolomic demarcations Mathur et al. (2003)
Cymbopogon martinii

Examination for genomic and expressed molecular

diversity among the elite and popular cultivars

Sangwan et al. (2003)
Boerhavia diffusa Assessment of genetic variability between accessions of different geographical origin within the Indian territory Shukla et al. (2003)
Droseraanglica and D. binata Verification of the clonal fidelity of two micropropagated plantlets Kawiak and Łojkowska (2004)
Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Assessment of genetic diversity and genetic relationships among 29 populations Deshwal et al. (2005)
Chlorophytum arundinaceum Baker Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plantlets Lattoo et al. (2006)
Lamiophlomis rotata Determination of genetic diversity and population structure employing a total of 188 individuals from eight natural populations Liu et al. (2006)

Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC.

(velvetbean)

Estimation of genetic diversity in 13 accessions Padmesh et al. (2006)
Typhonium trilobatum Identification genetic relationships in three species and evaluation of genetic variance within populations Rout (2006)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Identification of sex Agrawal et al. (2007)
Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (Huang-qin) Assessment of genetic stability of the germplasm lines in long term in vitro maintained cultures Alan et al. (2007)
Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. var. lobata and Pueraria phaseoloides (Roxb.) Benth. Assessment of genetic variation of five P. montana var. lobata and 16 P. phaseoloides accessions Heider et al. (2007)
Dioscorea bulbifera L. Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro regenerants Narula et al. (2007)
Siraitia grosvenorii Assessment of genetic diversity in cultivars and wild accessions Tang et al. (2007)
Dictyospermum ovalifolium Assessment of genetic stability of in vitro grown plantlets Chandrika et al. (2008)
Tribulus terrestris Detection of genetic polymorphism in this medicinal herb collected from various geographical regions of India Sarwat et al. (2008)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider A comparative study of genetic relationships among and within male and female genotypes Sharma et al. (2009)
Ginkgo biloba L. Sex type determination Liao et al. (2009)
Taxus wallichiana Assessment of genetic variation in nine natural populations from western part of the Himalayan ranges Mohapatra et al. (2009)
Atalantia monophylla, A. racemosa and A. wightii (L.) DC. Assessment of genetic diversity within and between populations Ranade et al. (2009)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Comparative assessment of marker assays for genetic diversity analysis Bhardwaj et al. (2010)
Bacopa monnieri (L.) Evaluation of genetic integrity in micropropagated plants and those of mother plants Ceasar et al. (2010)
Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand Assessment of genetic similarity of micropropagated plantlets with their mother plant Kumar et al. (2010)
Trollius Genetic diversity assessment Li and Ding (2010)
Chlorophytum borivilianum Assessment of the genetic stability of micropropagated and in vivo plant materials Samantaray and Maiti (2010)

Zingiber

montanum (Koenig) Link ex Dietr.

The genetic relatedness among 51 accessions, 14 species of the genus Zingiber and genetic variability of a clonally propagated species Bua-in and Paisooksantivatana (2010)
Vitex negundo L. Confirmation of the true-to-type nature of randomly selected micropropagated 2-year-old plant Ahmad and Anis (2011)
Swertia chirata Assessment of genetic fidelity of plantlets regenerated through somatic embryogenesis Balaraju et al. (2011)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Sex determination Hosseini et al. (2011)
Trigonella foenum-graecum Multilocus genotyping for detection of intraspecific variations Kakani et al. (2011)
Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell Assessment of genetic diversity in different accessions Karthikeyan et al. (2011)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants Kumar et al. (2011)
Trichopus zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro regenerants Martin et al. (2011)
Kaempferia galanga L. Molecular profiling of micropropagated plantlets Mohanty et al. (2011)
Aloe vera L. Assessment of genetic stability and instability of tissue culture-propagated plantlets Rathore et al. (2011)
Terminalia arjuna, T. bellerica and T. chebula Estimation of genetic diversity and evaluation of relatedness Sarwat et al. (2008)
Artemisia herba alba Genetic diversity of populations in central and north Saudi Arabia Badr et al. (2012)
Rauvolfia tetraphylla Assessment of DNA fingerprinting patterns among the micropropagated plants Faisal et al. (2012)
Mucuna pruriens L. Assessment of stability of among all the in vitro regenerated clones at the molecular level Lahiri et al. (2012)

Glycyrrhiza

glabra

Determination of genetic fidelity of plants obtained after conversion of alginate beads Mehrotra et al. (2012)
Nepenthes khasiana Hook f. Determination of genetic variation and gene flow estimation Nongrum et al. (2012)
Withania somnifera Assessment of variation among plants regenerated through indirect organogenesis Rana et al. (2012)
Panax quinquefolius L. Assessment of genetic relationships among and within populations Schlag and McIntosh (2012)
Bacopa monnieri L. Assessment of genetic variations among 15 accessions from Central India Tripathi et al. (2012)

Pleurotus

citrinopileatus Singer

Assessment of genetic diversity of the cultivars in China Zhang et al. (2012)
Vitex trifolia Establishment of genetic conformity of the in vitro regenerated plants Ahmad et al. (2013)
Ceropegia santapaui Assessment of DNA fingerprinting profile among the micropropagated plants Chavan et al. (2014)
Sapindus trifoliatus L. Estimation of genetic variability and population structure Mahar et al. (2013)

Picrorhiza kurroa Royle ex

Benth

Evaluation of genetic fidelity among in vitro regenerated plants Rawat et al. (2013)
Solanum trilobatum L. Assessment of genetic diversity across 14 accessions obtained from five South Indian states. Shilpha et al. (2013)
Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng Genetic relationships among wild and cultivated accessions Verma and Rana (2013)
Viola pilosa

Analysis of genetic stability of the in vitro grown

plants

Soni and Kaur (2014)

Table 2.

Employment of ISSR markers in molecular characterization of medicinal plants

Medicinal plant species Achievements References
Lamiophlomis rotata Determination of genetic diversity and population structure employing a total of 188 individuals from eight natural populations Liu et al. (2006)
Swertia chirayita Analysis of genetic diversity of genotypes collected from the temperate Himalayas of India Joshi and Dhawan (2007)
Cunila D. Royen ex L. To examine the genetic diversity among the South American species Agostini et al. (2008)
Swertia chirata Evaluation of their clonal fidelity of plants raised through direct organogenesis Kundu Chaudhuri et al. (2008)
Tribulus terrestris Detection of genetic polymorphism in this medicinal herb collected from various geographical regions of India Sarwat et al. (2008)
Terminalia arjuna, T. bellerica and T. chebula Estimation of genetic diversity and evaluation of relatedness Sarwat et al. (2008)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Marker-assisted selection of male and female plants Sharma et al. (2008)
Dysosma pleiantha Assessment of genetic variation and genetic structure of species distributed in southeastern China Zong et al. (2008)
Allium ampeloprasum L. Determination of genetic integrity of micropropagated plantlets Gantait et al. (2009)
Thymus daenensis Detection of genetic polymorphism using 17 accessions collected from different geographic regions in Iran Rahimmalek et al. (2009)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider A comparative study of genetic relationships among and within male and female genotypes Sharma et al. (2009)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Comparative assessment of marker assays for genetic diversity analysis Bhardwaj et al. (2010)
Aloe vera L. Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants Gantait et al. (2010a)
Allium ampeloprasum L. Determination of genetic integrity in long-term micropropagated plantlets Gantait et al. (2010b)
Cannabissativa L. monitor the genetic stability of the micropropagated plants up to thirty passages in culture Lata et al. (2010)
Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand Assessment of genetic similarity of micropropagated plantlets with their mother plant Kumar et al. (2010)
Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants Das et al. (2011)
Aloe vera L. Assessment of genetic similarity of micropropagated plantlets with their mother plant Gantait et al. (2011)
Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants Kumar et al. (2011)
Aloe vera L.

Assessment of genetic stability and instability of tissue

culture-propagated plantlets

Rathore et al. (2011)
Kaempferia galanga L. Molecular profiling of micropropagated plantlets Mohanty et al. (2011)
Sida species Assessment of degree of genetic diversity among different species Thul et al. (2011)
Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch) Bunge Development of sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers Yang et al. (2011)
Rauvolfia tetraphylla Assessment of DNA fingerprinting patterns among the micropropagated plants Faisal et al. (2012)
Mucuna pruriens L. Assessment of stability of among all the in vitro regenerated clones at the molecular level Lahiri et al. (2012)

Glycyrrhiza

glabra

Determination of genetic fidelity of plants obtained after conversion of alginate beads Mehrotra et al. (2012)
Two tetraploid species of Hibiscus Determination of Genome synteny and evolution of allotetraploids Satya et al. (2012)
Sapindus trifoliatus L. Estimation of genetic variability and population structure Mahar et al. (2013)

Picrorhiza kurroa Royle ex

Benth

Evaluation of genetic fidelity among in vitro regenerated plants Rawat et al. (2013)
Solanum trilobatum L. Assessment of genetic diversity across 14 accessions obtained from five South Indian states Shilpha et al. (2013)
Balanites aegyptiaca Evaluation of clonal integrity of micropropagated plantlets chosen from a clonal collection Varshney and Anis (2013)
Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng Genetic Relationships Among Wild and Cultivated Accessions Verma and Rana (2013)
Ceropegia santapaui Assessment of DNA fingerprinting profile among the micropropagated plants Chavan et al. (2014)
Viola pilosa

Analysis of genetic stability of the in vitro grown

plants

Soni and Kaur (2014)

Table 3.

Employment of AFLP markers in molecular characterization of medicinal plants

Medicinal plant species Achievements References
Dioscorea rotundata and D. cayenensis Assessment of genetic diversity Mignouna et al. (1997)
Azadirachta indica Assessment of genetic diversity Singh et al. (1999)
Datura sp. Assessment of genetic diversity Mace et al. (1999)
Moringa oliefera Determination of genetic variation Muluvi et al. (1999)
Cichorium sp. Diagnostic marker for endive and chicory Kiers et al. (2000)
Azadirachta indica Clonal fidelity in tissue culture raised plants Singh et al. (2002)
Actaea racemosa L. Identification and discrimination from three other closely related sympatric species Zerega et al. (2002)
Papaver (section Oxytona), in vitro cell lines of P. bracteatum Assessment species differentiation and genetic variability of in vitro-cultured plantlets Carolan et al. (2002)
Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Establishing clonal fidelity of tissue culture-raised plants Singh et al. (2002)
Solanum nigrum complex Assessment of genetic relationship between 14 genotypes of black nightshade Jacoby et al. (2003)
Echinacea purpurea Genetic mapping of via DNA fingerprinting of individual pollen Aziz and Sauve (2008)
Taxus wallichiana Assessment of genetic variation in nine natural populations from western part of the Himalayan ranges Mohapatra et al. (2009)
Carthamus tinctorius Inheritance and molecular marker analyses for HSYA trait Zhang et al. (2009)
Echinacea tennesseensis (Beadle) Small Phenotypic analyses during in vitro multiplication, storage, and acclimatization into soil Moraes et al. (2011)
Valeriana jatamansi Jones Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in Western Himalaya, India Rajkumar et al. (2011)

Application of RAPD

The root of RAPD method is the differential PCR amplification of genomic DNA. It infers DNA polymorphisms generated through “rearrangements or deletions at or between oligonucleotide primer binding sites in the genome” via short random oligonucleotide sequences (mostly ten bases long) (Williams et al. 1991). It can be utilized across species by means of universal primers because this approach does not entail prior information of the genome under analysis. The chief shortcoming of this approach is that the profiling is contingent on the reaction circumstances that may fluctuate amid laboratories and since a number of distinct loci in the genome are amplified by each primer, profiles are incompetent to differentiate heterozygous from homozygous members (Bardakci 2001). Nevertheless, due to the swiftness and effectiveness of RAPD analysis, high-density genetic mapping in loads of medicinal plant species such as Pueraria montana (Heider et al. 2007), Atalantia species (Ranade et al. 2009), Chlorophytum borivilianum (Samantaray and Maiti 2010), Swertia chirata (Balaraju et al. 2011), Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Rana et al. 2012) have been achieved. In Bacopa monnieri, Ramesh et al. (2011) used a RAPD fingerprinting approach to evaluate the genetic stability of 19 different micropropagated clones with the mother plant (wild type). Even though this study illustrates the sustained use of RAPD, relative assessment of a variety of DNA fingerprinting techniques indicate that this technique is less reliable and more complicated to implement consistently in comparison to AFLP, SSR, and ISSR (Pejic et al. 1998; McGregor et al. 2000). The details of RAPD markers used in molecular assessment of medicinal plants are being included in Table 1.

Application of ISSR

Several research groups used inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) as a better alternative DNA fingerprinting technique to appraise the genetic framework and diversity of wild and cultivated medicinal plants. Qiu et al. (2009) used ISSR markers to portray the genetic variation in wild and cultivated Rhizoma corydalis, a Chinese herbal medicine. In southern regions of China, the wild population of a medicinal plant species, Corydalis yanhusuo W.T. Wang ex Z.Y. Su et C.Y. Wu (Fumariaceae), has significantly been depleted and it has nearly been extinct from several other locations, owing to human interference along with environmental corrosion. These authors reported that the average within-population diversity of ISSR markers was superior in wild than in cultivated populations and suggested that the existing wild populations should be given a high precedence for in situ conservation as they possibly will function as reservoirs of genetic diversity in the species in the face of extinction (Qiu et al. 2009). Lata et al. (2010) reported that in vitro generated plants of Cannabis sativa, over 30 passages in culture and acclimatization in soil for 8 months, were genetically constant when assessed through ISSR markers and revealed a similar cannabinoid profile. The genetic variation amongst wild and cultivated populations of the Chinese medicinal plant Coptis chinensis (Ranunculaceae) was investigated using ISSR by Shi et al. (2008). They observed that the genetic diversity in wild and cultivated populations was largely similar but there was noteworthy genetic variation among the wild populations. Use of ISSR markers have been well documented in several other medicinal plants like Swertia chirayita (Joshi and Dhawan 2007), Tribulus terrestris (Sarwat et al. 2008), Pleurotus citrinopileatus (Zhang et al. 2012). The particulars of ISSR markers employed in molecular evaluation of such medicinal plants are described in Table 2.

Application of AFLP

To triumph over the restraint of reproducibility coupled with RAPD, an amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLP) technology (Vos et al. 1995) was developed. AFLP has several advantages to consider it applicable in the estimation of genetic diversity, genetic mapping, and tagging. AFLP has now developed into a favored approach as it unites the advantage of RFLP with the agility of PCR-based techniques by ligating primer recognition sequences to the restricted DNA and selective PCR amplification of restriction fragments via a restricted set of primers. The AFLP approach produces fingerprints of any DNA despite of its source, devoid of any previous information of DNA sequence. The primer pairs employed for AFLP typically generate 50–100 bands per assay. “Number of amplicons per AFLP assay is a function of the number selective nucleotides in the AFLP primer combination, the selective nucleotide motif, GC content and physical genome size and complexity”. Most AFLP fragments match up to distinctive locations on the genome and, therefore, can be used as pointer in genetic and physical mapping. The system can be used to differentiate strongly associated individuals at the sub-species level (Althoff et al. 2007) and can map genes too. Zerega et al. (2002) examined the use of AFLP as an analytical means of identifying Actaea racemosa from three other closely related sympatric species. A total number of 262 AFLP markers were generated, and one unique fingerprint was identified for A. racemosa, whereas two, six, and eight unique fingerprints were identified for the closely related species A. pachypoda, A. cordifolia, and A. podocarpa, respectively. Two commercial black cohosh products were also subjected to AFLP analysis and shown to contain only A. racemosa. The results of their study suggested that AFLP analysis may offer a useful method for quality control in the botanical dietary supplements industry. Applications for AFLP in plant mapping include genetic mapping of the pollen genome of Echinacea purpurea ‘Magnus’ (purple coneflower) which was amplified by a modified primer extension pre-amplification (PEP) procedure subsequently AFLP analyses of individual pollen grains (Aziz and Sauve 2008).

Using AFLP, He et al. (2009) investigated the population structure and genetic diversity of wild and cultivated populations of Magnolia officinalis subsp. biloba (Magnoliaceae) Plant. Principal coordinates analysis of AFLP data did not discriminate between wild and cultivated populations, which led the authors to conclude that alleles from the wild population were maintained in the cultivated gene pool. A sole report has been published in recent past by Agarwal et al. (2011) on development of sex-linked AFLP markers in jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis). Singh et al. (2002) reported application of AFLP markers for ascertaining clonal fidelity in tissue culture-raised progenies of a medicinally important plant, Azadirachta indica. AFLP markers are now being routinely employed for assessment of genetic variation in economically important plant species including chichory (Kiers et al. 2000), Withania sp. (Negi et al. 2000) (Table 3).

Use of microsatellite markers

“Microsatellite or short tandem repeats or simple sequences repeats (SSR) are monotonous repetitions of very short (one to five) nucleotide motifs, which occur as interspersed repetitive elements in all eukaryotic genomes” (Tautz and Renz 1984). However, strand slippage during DNA replication, where the repeats allow matching through excision or addition of repeats, results in disparity in the number of tandemly repeated units (Schlotterer and Tautz 1992). As slippage in replication is more expected than point mutations, microsatellite loci tend to be hypervariable. Microsatellite assays explain wide inter-individual length polymorphisms during PCR analysis of unique loci using discriminatory primers sets. High level of polymorphism and their co-dominant nature have made SSRs ideal markers for studying genetic diversity in plants (Plaschke et al. 1995). Hon et al. (2003) reported the efficiency of SSR markers in genetic authentication of two Panax species. Later on, Qin et al. (2005) employed SSR markers to identify and differentiate American ginseng and Oriental ginseng, cultivated and wild American ginseng. Huang et al. (2009) developed eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Chinese medicinal plant Artemisia annua L. (Asteraceae), useful for investigating the genetic diversity, genetic structure and gene flow within populations. Li et al. (2009) isolated polymorphic microsatellite loci and characterized them from an AC-enriched genomic library of Akebia trifoliate ssp. australis. A robust set of 17 polymorphic EST–SSRs were developed and used for evaluating 20 turmeric accessions (Siju et al. 2010). Eleven microsatellite markers were isolated and characterized from enriched genomic libraries of Channa argus (Gul et al. 2010). Rahimmalek et al. (2011) developed and characterized SSR markers for the first time from the genome of yarrow (Achillea millefoilum L.), using the slightly modified Hamilton protocol to allow the selection of desired genotypes rather than phenotypes and hence to accelerate the breeding programs. Microsatellite (GTG)5 were used to assess DNA polymorphism and genetic diversity in Allium ampeloprasum (Guenaoui et al. 2013). Likewise, Zhou et al. (2012) used 10 microsatellite (SSR) loci to investigate genetic diversity and differentiation in 16 natural populations of Saruma henryi Oliv. Use of cross-species SSR markers was reported in genetic diversity analysis of synthetic interspecific hybrid of Hibiscus which revealed a closer association of diploid genomes and high variability of tetraploid genomes (Satya et al. 2012). Most recently, Katoch et al. (2013) used DNA-based molecular marker techniques, viz. simple sequence repeats (SSR) and cytochrome P-450 markers to estimate genetic diversity in Picrorhiza kurrooa.

Use of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs)

“Single nucleotide variations in genome sequence of individuals of a population are known as SNPs”. They comprise the most copious molecular markers in the genome and are extensively distributed all through genomes even though their occurrence and allocation vary between species. Maize has 1 SNP per 60–120 bp (Ching et al. 2002). The SNPs are generally more ubiquitous in the non-coding regions of the genome. An SNP, within the coding regions, is either non-synonymous and results in an amino acid sequence alteration (Sunyaev et al. 1999), or it is synonymous and fail to modify the amino acid sequence. Synonymous changes can modify mRNA splicing, ensuing in phenotypic variations (Richard and Beckman 1995).

Advancement in sequencing technology and accessibility of an escalating number of expressed sequence tags (EST) sequences has made direct analysis of genetic variation at the DNA sequence level achievable (Buetow et al. 1999; Soleimani et al. 2003). “Prevalence of SNP genotyping assays are based on one or two of the following molecular mechanisms: allele specific hybridization, primer extension, oligonucleotide ligation and persistent cleavage” (Sobrino et al. 2005). High-throughput genotyping methods counting DNA chips, allele-specific PCR, and primer extension approaches make SNPs especially attractive as genetic markers. They are apposite for automation and are employed for a variety of purposes, including rapid detection of crop cultivars and construction of ultra high-density genetic maps. Ginger (Zingiberofficinale Rosc), a well-known plant for its medicinal applications, was successfully applied for the development of high-throughput methods for the detection of SNPs and small indels (insertion/deletion). In that study, 64026 SNP sites and 7034 indel polymorphisms with frequency of 0.84 SNPs/100 bp were found and among the three tissues from which the EST libraries were generated, rhizomes had high frequency of 1.08 SNPs/indels per 100 bp whereas the leaves had lowest frequency of 0.63 per 100 bp and root showed relative frequency of 0.82/100 bp (Chandrasekar et al. 2009). Work has been done for authentication of medicinal plants by SNP-based Multiplex PCR, where highly variable intergenic spacer and intron regions from nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA have been used for species identification (Lee et al. 2012). Noncoding internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) located in 18S-5.8S-26S, and 5S ribosomal RNA genes (rDNAs) were the target region for this purpose. In this context, noncoding regions from two cytoplasmic DNA, chloroplast DNA (trnT-F intergenic spacer region), and mitochondrial DNA (fourth intron region of nad7 gene) were also successfully applied for the proper identification of medicinal plants and SNP sites obtained from the amplification of intergenic spacer and intron regions were properly utilized for the verification of medicinal plants in species level using multiplex PCR. Dendrobiumofficinale is used as a crude drug in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) having tonic efficacy. For crude drug quality control and authentication of different populations the sequences from its chloroplast, nuclear, and mitochondrial genes and the method of genomic DNA (gDNA) suppression subtraction hybridization (SSH) were successfully used. In that experiment, six populations were authenticated successfully by nine SNP sites and six pairs of diagnostic primers. Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) was also designed to identify six populations on the basis of SNPs (Ding et al. 2008).

Expressed sequence tags of medicinal plants

Expressed sequence tags (ESTs), identified by the single-pass sequencing of randomly selected clones from the cDNA library, are molecular tools that are reasonably useful in defining an expressed gene, and also specify the profusion of transcripts. Large-scale EST databases offer a multitude of information concerning the complexities of gene expression patterns, the functions of transcripts, and the development of SNPs (Yang et al. 2004). In plant, large-scale EST databases have been recognized, and an array of ESTs procured from different tissues, developmental stages, and stress-treated cDNA libraries have been compared with model plants and crops. In most of the medicinal plants, nevertheless, the complete genome and draft sequences are yet to be established. Consequently, EST assay represents the most rational system for the study of the genome of the plants with medicinal importance; hence, several attempts have been made in this aspect by a number of research groups. Monoterpene indole alkaloid (MIA) pathway genes were identified from random sequencing of C. roseus cDNA library which revealed 3,655 unique ESTs, comprising 1,142 clusters and 2,513 single tons. A number of novel MIA pathway candidate genes were recognized by the cloning and functional characterization of loganic acid O-methyletransferase implicated in secologanin biosynthesis. Biochemical pathway, for instance, triterpene biosynthesis was also identified and its metabolite analysis revealed localization of oleanane-type triterpenes exclusively to the cuticular wax layer. The results illuminated biochemical specialization of Catheranthus leaf epidermis for the production of multiple classes of metabolites (Murata et al. 2008). Also, jasmonate-induced changes on the transcripts and alkaloid profiles of tobacco BY-2 and C. roseus cell cultures have been monitored through similar approach (Rischer et al. 2006; Goossens et al. 2003). ESTs analogous to 40 enzymes involved in the conversion of sucrose to sanguinarine were identified from elicitor-induced cell culture of Papaver somniferum. Significant enhancement in the level of RNA was observed in case of elicitate cell culture as compared to control and the identified metabolites were sanguinarin, dihydrosanguinarine, methoxylated derivatives, dihydrochelirubine and chelibine and the identified alkaloid pathway intermediates were N-methylcoclaurine, N-methylestylopine, and protopine (Zulak et al. 2005). Likewise, cDNA library of Artimisia annua glandular trichome revealed the occurrence of scores of ESTs implicated in isoprenoid biosynthesis for instance enzymes from the methylerythritol phosphate pathway and the mevalonate pathway, amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase and other sesquiterpene synthase, monoterpene synthases and 2-cDNAs revealing prominent resemblance to germacrene-A-synthases (Berteaa et al. 2006). Siju et al. (2010) used ESTs from turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) for the screening of type and frequency of Class I (hypervariable) simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Recently, to identify rhizome-enriched genes and genes encoding specialized metabolism enzymes and pathway regulators, Koo et al. (2013) evaluated an assembled collection of ESTs from eight different ginger and turmeric tissues. In Panax ginseng, Kim et al. (2006) found that 2,896 cDNA clones represent 1,576 unique sequences, consisting of 1,167 singletons and 409 contig sequences. The ESTs referenced in their report were the first transcriptomes in a leaf from a half-shade ginseng plant. The majority of the identified transcripts were found to be genes related with energy, metabolism, subcellular localization, protein synthesis and transport. Xie et al. (2008) built an EST database from four basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) lines with distinct product profiles providing the sequence foundation required for comparative proteomic studies. Cloutier et al. (2009) exploited EST to develop SSRs for genomic assessment of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Sathiyamoorthy et al. (2010) obtained a total of 6,757 ESTs from cDNA libraries in Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. This EST dataset provides a wide outlook of the genes expressed in hairy roots, 14-year root and 4-year root. The dataset contains more than 1,365 EST sequences related to plant secondary metabolism and 745 sequences related to stresses. Li et al. (2010) used the 454 GS FLX platform and Titanium regents to produce a substantial EST dataset from the vegetative organs of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Based on the EST analysis, novel candidate genes related to the secondary metabolite pathway of glycyrrhizin, including novel genes encoding cytochrome P450 s and glycosyltransferases, were found. However, there are a few and limited genomic resources available for Picrorhiza (Bantawa et al. 2012) in spite of its immense medicinal importance. A total of 728 ESTs of P. kurroa and 27 of P. scrophulariflora have been deposited at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Kawoosa et al. (2010) have identified two regulatory genes of terpenoid metabolism, namely- 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (pkhmgr) and 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-25 phosphate synthase (pkdxs) from P. kurroa. An account of hundreds of genes implicated not only in alkaloid biosynthesis but also in plant secondary metabolism. Subsequently, large-scale functional analysis of genes from this inventory, potentially involved in plant secondary metabolism, was carried out. This comprises isolation, introduction, and functional assay of full-length open reading frames in transgenic plant cells. Tools to enhance and accelerate functional analysis of candidate genes in transgenic plant cells with reporter gene constructs, transient protoplast expression assays, and microarray facilities, have been designed and their uses validated.

Microchip based genomic profiling

High-throughput and automated genomic techniques have been proven to speed up modern day research for generating large number of data. DNA microarray is a arrayed series of thousands of microscopic spots of DNA oligonucleotides, called features, each containing picomoles (10–12 mol) of a specific DNA sequence, known as probes (or reporters). It can be used to measure changes in expression levels, detection of SNPs, to genotype or resequence mutant genomes (Hao et al. 2010). This techniques was successfully applied to identify toxic traditional Chinese medicinal plants, where species- specific oligonucleotide probes were obtained from the 5S rRNAgene of Aconitum carmichaeli Debx., A. kusnezoffi Reichb., Alocasia macrorrhiza (Linn.) Schott, Croton tiglium L., Datura inoxia Mill., D. metel L., D. tatula L., Dysosma pleiantha (Hance) Woodson, D. versipellis (Hance) M. Cheng ex Ying, Euphorbia kansui L., Hyoscyamus niger L., Pinellia cordata N.e. Brown, P. pedatisecta Schott, P. ternata (Thunb.) Breit., Rhododendron molle (Blum) G. Don, Strychnos nux-vomica L., Typhonium divaricatum (Linn.) Decne., and T. giganteum Engl., and the leucine transfer RNA gene of A. pendulum Busch and Stellera chamaejasme L. (Carles et al. 2005). This is a rapid tool for quality control and safety monitoring of herbal pharmaceuticals and neutraceuticals. There are other reports on the use of microarray for high throughput identification of the plant resource of commercial FDSH [Fengdu Shihu (Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo)] (Sze et al. 2008), identification of various Panax plants and drugs (Zhu et al. 2008), genotyping, and identification of the origin of various species of Fritillaria L. at molecular level (Tsoi et al. 2003).

DNA barcoding

DNA barcoding is the application of molecular phylogeny where, the species of an individual organism is signatured using small sections of chloroplast/nuclear/mitochondrial DNA. A DNA barcode is a potential tool for taxonomic identification that employs short, standardized DNA sequences (mostly 400–800 bp) present universally in target lineages and has ample sequence variation to differentiate among species of a specific organism. This offers a quick and precise system for definite species identification through/via adequate sequence variation amongst species and little intraspecific variation. The universally accepted genes for plant DNA barcoding are of plastid origin. Twenty-five years following the publication of the first complete sequence of a chloroplast genome by Shinozaki et al. (1986); several scientists have used next-generation sequencing technology to sequence the complete chloroplast genomes from quite a few number of plants (Parks et al. 2009) (Doorduin et al. 2011). Polymorphism of chloroplast DNA particularly trnK, matK, and intergenic trnL–trnF regions have been exploited to learn the phylogeny of several plants (Kress et al. 2005; Selvaraj et al. 2008). However, Buxus (Buxaceae), Chloranthus (Chloranthaceae), Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae), and Illicium (Schisandraceae) have comparatively strong chloroplast genome information that can be tapped (Hansen et al. 2007). Hao et al. (2009) showed the evolutionary patterns of gene sequence divergence from the medicinal genus Taxus L., encoding paclitaxel biosynthetic enzymes taxadiene synthase (TS) and 10-deacetyl- baccatin III-10 beta-O-acetyltransferase (DBAT). According to Yao et al. (2009), the psbA-trnH spacer regions were effective barcodes for species of Dendrobium Sw. This technique was used for the first time to discriminate the Polygonaceae in Chinese Pharmacopoeia and their adulterants (Song et al. 2009). Chen et al. (2010) compared seven candidate DNA barcodes (psbA-trnH, matK, rbcL, rpoC1, ycf5, ITS2, and ITS) from medicinal plant species. Gao et al. (2010) showed ITS2 sequences to show considerable variation at the genus and species level within the family Fabaceae.

Conclusion: future of medicinal plant genomics

Molecular techniques have been well proven for authentication of medicinal plants based on phylogenic variation signatured on chloroplast and nuclear DNA regions. DNA markers are the powerful tool for the characterization of sample homogeneity and detection of adulterants and thus assure quality control in medicinal plant research as well as in the production, clinical use, and forensic examination of herbal medicines for their safest use. So, there is always an immediate need to scrutinize the genomic tools in detail so as to harvest the advantages of genomics in total for the broad use of medicinal plant genome. A comprehensive study and research is a demand for all-round use of genomics for authentic and safe use of botanical products and medicinal plants. With the advent of new DNA sequencing platforms that achieve an ever-increasing degree of speed, coverage, and sharply decreasing costs for obtaining the data, we can expect to see many genome libraries, SNP chips and, ultimately, a complete genome sequencing (of plastid) effort. More recently, marker systems of various types have been developed and these have increased our knowledge of the population structure of various medicinal plant populations. The more recent sequencing of the nuclear and chloroplast genomes will allow the development of additional tools for studying not only the population structure but also the genetic basis of various traits and their inheritance. Genome sequencing projects may be initiated vividly for all the plants having medicinal use. In this regard, sequence databases with all the bioinformatics tools should be made available for public use by different nations; as such platforms are only available for rice and some other crop plants.

Acknowledgments

The authors are appreciative of Department of Biotechnology, Instrumentation and Environmental Science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, India for providing research facilities.

Conflict of interest

We, the authors of this article, declare that there is no conflict of interest and we do not have any financial gain from it.

Abbreviations

ESTs

Expressed sequence tags

RFLP

Restriction fragment length polymorphism

RAPD

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA

AFLP

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

SSR

Simple sequence repeat

ISSR

Inter simple sequence repeat

SNP

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

UPGMA

Unweighted pair group method arithmetic average

References

  1. Agarwal M, Shrivastava N, Padh H. Development of sex-linked AFLP markers in Simmondsia chinensis. Plant Breed. 2011;130:114–116. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agostini G, Echeverrigaray S, Souza-Chies TT. Genetic relationships among South American species of Cunila D. Royen ex L. based on ISSR. Plant Syst Evol. 2008;274:135–141. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agrawal V, Sharma K, Sarika G, Kumar R, Prasad M. ISSR marker-assisted selection of male and female plants in a promising dioecious crop: jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) Plant Biotech Rep. 2007;2:239–243. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmad N, Anis M. An efficient in vitro process for recurrent production of cloned plants of Vitex negundo L. Euro J For Res. 2011;130:135–144. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmad N, Javed SB, Khan MI, Anis M. Rapid plant regeneration and analysis of genetic fidelity in micropropagated plants of Vitex trifolia: an important medicinal plant. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013;35:2493–2500. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahuja S, Mandal BB, Dixit S, Srivastava PS. Molecular, phenotypic and biosynthetic stability in Dioscorea floribunda plants derived from cryopreserved shoot tips. Plant Sci. 2002;163:971–977. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alan AR, Zeng H, Assani A, Shi WL, McRae HE, Murch SJ, Saxena PK. Assessment of genetic stability of the germplasm lines of medicinal plant Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (Huang-qin) in long-term, in vitro maintained cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:1345–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0332-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Althoff DM, Gitzendanner MA, Segraves KA. The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes. Syst Biol. 2007;56:477–484. doi: 10.1080/10635150701427077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Amarger V, Mercier L. Molecular analysis of RAPD DNA based markers: their potential use for the detection of genetic variability in jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider) Biochimie. 1995;77:931–936. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(95)80004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Appleby N, Edwards D, Batley J. New technologies for ultra-high throughput genotyping in plants. Plant Genomics. 2009;513:19–39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-427-8_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Arai-Kichise Y, Shiwa Y, Nagasaki H, Ebana K, Yoshikawa H, Yano M, Wakasa K. Discovery of genome-wide DNA polymorphisms in a Landrace cultivar of Japonica rice by whole-genome sequencing. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52:274–282. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aziz AN, Sauve RJ. Genetic mapping of Echinacea purpurea via individual pollen DNA fingerprinting. Mol Breed. 2008;21:227–232. [Google Scholar]
  13. Badr A, El-Shazly HH, Helail NS, El Ghanim W. Genetic diversity of Artemisia populations in central and north Saudi Arabia based on morphological variation and RAPD polymorphism. Plant Syst Evol. 2012;298:871–886. [Google Scholar]
  14. Balaraju K, Saravanan S, Agastian P, Ignacimuthu S. A rapid system for micropropagation of Swertia chirata Buch- Ham. ex Wall.: an endangered medicinal herb via direct somatic embryogenesis. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33:1123–1133. [Google Scholar]
  15. Balasubramani SP, Goraya GS, Venkatasubramanian P. Development of ITS sequence-based markers to distinguish Berberis aristata DC. from B. lycium Royle and B. asiatica Roxb. 3. Biotech. 2011;1:11–19. doi: 10.1007/s13205-010-0001-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bantawa P, Das A, Mondal TK. Genetic variation of extremely threatened medicinal plant Nepalese Kutki (Picrorhiza scrophulariiflora) Ind J Genet Plant Bred. 2012;72:103–106. [Google Scholar]
  17. Barbazuk WB, Schnable PS. SNP discovery by transcriptome pyrosequencing. cDNA Libr. 2011;729:225–246. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-065-2_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bardakci F. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Turk J Biol. 2001;25:185–196. [Google Scholar]
  19. Berteaa CM, Vostera A, Francel WA, Maffeib VM, Beekwildera J, et al. Isoprenoid biosynthesis in Artemisia annua: cloning and heterologous expression of a germacrene A synthase from a glandular trichome cDNA library. Arch Biochem Biophy. 2006;448:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bhardwaj M, Uppal S, Jain S, Kharb P, Dhillon R, Jain RK. Comparative assessment of ISSR and RAPD marker assays for genetic diversity analysis in jojoba [Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider] J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;19:255–258. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bua-in S, Paisooksantivatana Y. Study of clonally propagated cassumunar ginger (Zingiber montanum (Koenig) Link ex Dietr.) and its relation of wild Zingiber species from Thailand revealed by RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010;57:405–414. [Google Scholar]
  22. Buehler D, Graf R, Holderegger R, Gugerli F. Using the 454 pyrosequencing-based technique in the development of nuclear microsatellite loci in the alpine plant Arabis alpine (Brassicaceae) Am J Bot. 2011;98:103–105. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Buetow KH, Edmonson MN, Cassidy AB. Reliable identification of large numbers of candidate SNPs from public EST data. Nat Genet. 1999;21:323–332. doi: 10.1038/6851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carles M, Cheung MK, Moganti S, Dong TT, Tsim KW, Ip NY, Sucher NJ. A DNA microarray for the authentication of toxic traditional Chinese medicinal plants. Planta Med. 2005;71:580–584. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-864166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Carolan JC, Hook ILI, Walsh JJ, Hodkinson TR. Using AFLP markers for species differentiation and assessment of genetic variability of in vitro-cultured Papaver bracteatum (section Oxytona) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2002;38:300–307. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ceasar SA, Maxwell SL, Prasad KB, Karthigan M, Ignacimuthu S. Highly efficient shoot regeneration of Bacopa monnieri (L.) using a two-stage culture procedure and assessment of genetic integrity of micropropagated plants by RAPD. Acta Physiol Plant. 2010;32:443–452. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chandrasekar AR, Sithara K, Anoop S, Eapen SJ. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphism in ginger using expressed sequence tags. Bioinformation. 2009;4:119. doi: 10.6026/97320630004119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chandrika M, Thoyajaksha, Rai VR, Kini KR. Assessment of genetic stability of in vitro grown Dictyospermum ovalifolium. Biol Plant. 2008;52:735–739. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chaudhary S, Pandey R, Sharma V, Tripathi BN, Kumar S. Detection and mapping of QTLs affecting contents of pharmaceutical alkaloids in leaf and root of Catharanthus roseus. Agric Res. 2013;2:9–23. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chavan JJ, Gaikwad NB, Umdale SD, Kshirsagar PR, Bhat KV, Yadav SR. Efficiency of direct and indirect shoot organogenesis, molecular profiling, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of micropropagated Ceropegia santapaui. Plant Growth Regul. 2014;72:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen SL, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Gao T, Pang X, Luo K, Li Y, Li X, Jia X, Lin Y, Leon C. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e8613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ching ADA, Caldwell KS, Jung M, Dolan M, Smith OS, Tingey S, Morgante M, Rafalski A. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. BMC Genet. 2002;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-3-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cloutier S, Niu Z, Datla R, Duguid S. Development and analysis of EST-SSRs for flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Theor Appl Genet. 2009;119:53–63. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Csencsics D, Brodbeck S, Holderegger R. Cost-effective, species-specific microsatellite development for the endangered dwarf Bulrush (Typha minima) using next-generation sequencing technology. J Hered. 2010;101:789–793. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esq069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Das A, Gantait S, Mandal N. Micropropagation of an elite medicinal plant: Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Int J Agricultural Res. 2011;6:40–48. [Google Scholar]
  36. Delmas CEL, Lhuillier E, Pornon A, Escaravage N. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Rhododendron ferrugineum (Ericaceae) using pyrosequencing technology. Am J Bot. 2011;98:120–122. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Deschamps S, Campbell M. Utilization of next-generation sequencing platforms in plant genomics and genetic variant discovery. Mol Breeding. 2010;25:553–570. [Google Scholar]
  38. Deshwal RS, Singh R, Malik K, Randhawa GJ. Assessment of genetic diversity and genetic relationships among 29 populations of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. using RAPD markers. Gen Resour Crop Evol. 2005;52:285–292. [Google Scholar]
  39. Diao Y, Lin XM, Liao CL, Tang CZ, Chen ZJ, Hu ZL. Authentication of Panax ginseng from its adulterants by PCR-RFLP and ARMS. Planta Med. 2009;75:557–560. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ding G, Zhang D, Feng Z, Fan W, Ding X, Li X. SNP, ARMS and SSH authentication of medicinal Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo and application for identification of Fengdou drugs. Biol Pharma Bulletin. 2008;31:553–557. doi: 10.1248/bpb.31.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Doorduin L, Gravendeel B, Lammers Y, Ariyurek Y, Chin AWT, Vrieling K. The complete chloroplast genome of 17 individuals of pest species Jacobaea vulgaris: SNPs, microsatellites and barcoding markers for population and phylogenetic studies. DNA Res. 2011;18:93–105. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsr002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:19379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Faisal M, Alatar AA, Ahmad N, Anis M, Hegazy AK. An efficient and reproducible method for in vitro clonal multiplication of Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. and evaluation of genetic stability using DNA-based markers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;168:1739–1752. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9893-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gantait S, Mandal N, Bhattacharyya S, Das PK, Mandal N, Bhattacharyya S, Das PK. In vitro mass multiplication with genetic clonality in elephant garlic (Allium ampeloprasum L.) J Crop Weed. 2009;5:100–104. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gantait S, Mandal N, Bhattacharyya S, Das PK. A novel strategy for in vitro conservation of Aloe vera L. through long term shoot culture. Biotechnology. 2010;9:326–331. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gantait S, Mandal N, Bhattacharyya S, Das PK. Determination of genetic integrity in long-term micropropagated plantlets of Allium ampeloprasum L. using ISSR markers. Biotechnology. 2010;9:218–223. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gantait S, Mandal N, Das PK. In vitro accelerated mass propagation and ex vitro evaluation of Aloe vera L. with aloin content and superoxide dismutase activity. Natural Product Res. 2011;25:1370–1378. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.541885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gao T, Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Zhu Y, Ma X, Pang X, Xu H, Chen S. Identification of medicinal plants in the family Fabaceae using a potential DNA barcode ITS2. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;130:116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gardner MG, Fitch AJ, Bertozzi T, Lowe AJ. Rise of the machines—recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:1093–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Goossens A, Hakkinen ST, Laakso I, et al. A functional genomic approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8595–8600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1032967100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Griffin PC, Robin C, Hoffmann AA. A next-generation sequencing method for overcoming the multiple gene copy problem in polyploid phylogenetics, applied to Poa grasses. BMC Biol. 2011;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Guenaoui C, Mang S, Figliuolo G, Neffati M. Diversity in Allium ampeloprasum: from small and wild to large and cultivated. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2013;60:97–114. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gul Y, Wang W, Wang H. The isolation and characterization of 10 dinucleotide microsatellite markers from enriched Channa argus genomic library. Conservation Genet Resour. 2010;2:59–61. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gupta S, Pandey-Rai S, Srivastava S, Naithani SC, Prasad M, Kumar S. Construction of genetic linkage map of the medicinal and ornamental plant Catharanthus roseus. J Genet. 2007;86:259–268. doi: 10.1007/s12041-007-0033-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hansen DR, Dastidar S, Zhengqiu CG, Penaflor C, Kuehl J, Jeffrey V, Boore L, Jansen RK. Phylogenetic and evolutionary implications of complete chloroplast genome sequences of four early-diverging angiosperms: Buxus (Buxaceae), Chloranthus (Chloranthaceae), Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae), and Illicium (Schisandraceae) Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;45:547–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hao DC, Chen SL, Xiao PG. Authentication of medicinal plants based on molecular biology and genomics. Chinese J Pharm Biotech. 2009;16:490–494. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hao DC, Chen SL, Xiao PG, Peng Y. Authentication of medicinal plants by DNA-based markers and genomics. Chinese Herbal Med. 2010;2:250–261. [Google Scholar]
  58. He J, Chen L, Si Y, Huang B, Ban X, Wang Y. Population structure and genetic diversity distribution in wild and cultivated populations of the traditional Chinese medicinal plant Magnolia officinalis subsp. biloba (Magnoliaceae) Genetica. 2009;135:233–243. doi: 10.1007/s10709-008-9272-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Heider B, Fischer E, Berndl T, Schultze-Kraft R. Analysis of genetic variation among accessions of Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. var. lobata and Pueraria phaseoloides (Roxb.) Benth. based on RAPD markers. Gen Resour Crop Evol. 2007;54:529–542. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hon CC, Chow YC, Zeng FY, Leung FC. Genetic authentication of ginseng and other traditional Chinese medicine. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2003;24:841–846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hosseini FS, Hassani HS, Arvin MJ, Baghizadeh A, Nejad GM. Sex determination of jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis cv. Arizona) by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) molecular markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10:470–474. [Google Scholar]
  62. Huang HR, Zhou G, Ge XJ, Wei X, Jiang YS, Tang H. Eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Chinese medicinal plant Artemisia annua L. (Asteraceae) Conserv Genet. 2009;10:593–595. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hyten D, Song Q, Fickus E, Quigley C, Lim JS, Choi IY, Hwang EY, Pastor-Corrales M, Cregan P. High-throughput SNP discovery and assay development in common bean. BMC Genom. 2010;11:475. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jacoby A, Labuschagne MT, Viljoen CD. Genetic relationships between Southern African Solanum retroflexum Dun. and other related species measured by morphological and DNA markers. Euphytica. 2003;132:109–113. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jayasinghe R, Hai Niu L, Coram TE, Kong S, Kaganovitch J, Xue CC, Li CG, Pang EC. Effectiveness of an innovative prototype subtracted diversity array (SDA) for fingerprinting plant species of medicinal importance. Planta Med. 2009;75:1180–1185. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jones N, Ougham H, Thomas H, Pašakinskieṅe I. Markers and mapping revisited: finding your gene. New Phytol. 2009;183:935–966. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Joshi P, Dhawan V. Analysis of genetic diversity among Swertia chirayita genotypes. Biol Plant. 2007;51:764–768. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kakani RK, Singh SK, Pancholy A, Meena RS, Pathak R, Raturi A. Assessment of genetic diversity in Trigonella foenum-graecum based on nuclear ribosomal DNA, internal transcribed spacer and RAPD analysis. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2011;29:315–323. [Google Scholar]
  69. Karthikeyan A, Madhanraj A, Pandian SK, Ramesh M. Genetic variation among highly endangered Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell from Southern India as detected using RAPD analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2011;58:769–782. [Google Scholar]
  70. Katoch M, Hussain MA, Ahuja A. Comparison of SSR and cytochrome P-450 markers for estimating genetic diversity in Picrorhiza kurrooa L. Plant Syst Evol. 2013;299:1637–1643. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kawiak A, Łojkowska E. Application of RAPD in the determination of genetic fidelity in micropropagated Drosera plantlets. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2004;40:592–595. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kawoosa T, Singh H, Kumar A, Sharma SK, Devi K, Dutt S, Vats SK, Sharma M, Ahuja PS, Kumar S. Light and temperature regulated terpene biosynthesis: hepatoprotective monoterpene picroside accumulation in Picrorhiza kurroa. Funct Integr Genomics. 2010;10:393–404. doi: 10.1007/s10142-009-0152-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Srivastava A, Kumar S. Assessment of genetic relationships in Mentha species. Euphytica. 2000;111:121–125. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kiers AM, Mes TMH, Van der MR, Bachmann K. A search for diagnostic AFLP markers in Cichorium species with emphasis on endive and chicory cultivar groups. Genome. 2000;43:470–476. doi: 10.1139/g00-024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kim MK, Lee BS, In JG, Sun H, Yoon JH, Yang DC. Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of ginseng leaf. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:599–606. doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0095-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Koo HJ, McDowell ET, Ma X, Greer KA, Kapteyn J, Xie Z, Descour A, Kim HR, Yu Y, Kudrna D, Wing RA, Soderlund CA, Gang DR. Ginger and turmeric expressed sequence tags identify signature genes for rhizome identity and development and the biosynthesis of curcuminoids, gingerols and terpenoids. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kress WJ, Kenneth JW, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8369–8374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503123102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Kumar J, Verma V, Shahi AK, Qazi GN, Balyan HS. Development of simple sequence repeat markers in Cymbopogon species. Planta Med. 2007;73:262–266. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-967121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Kumar A, Aggarwal D, Gupta P, Reddy MS. Factors affecting in vitro propagation and field establishment of Chlorophytum borivilianum. Biol Plant. 2010;54:601–606. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kumar S, Mangal M, Dhawan AK, Singh N. Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants of Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider using RAPD and ISSR markers. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33:2541–2545. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kundu Chaudhuri R, Pal A, Jha TB. Conservation of Swertia chirata through direct shoot multiplication from leaf explants. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2008;2:213–218. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lahiri K, Mukhopadhyay MJ, Desjardins Y, Mukhopadhyay S. Rapid and stable in vitro regeneration of plants through callus morphogenesis in two varieties of Mucuna pruriens L.: an anti Parkinson’s drug yielding plant. Nucleus. 2012;55:37–43. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lata H, Chandra S, Techen N, Khan IA, ElSohly MA. Assessment of the genetic stability of micropropagated plants of Cannabis sativa by ISSR markers. Planta Med. 2010;76:97–100. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Lattoo SK, Bamotra S, Sapru Dhar R, Khan S, Dhar AK. Rapid plant regeneration and analysis of genetic fidelity of in vitro derived plants of Chlorophytum arundinaceum Baker: an endangered medicinal herb. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:499–506. doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lee OR, Kim MK, Yang DC (2012) Authentication of medicinal plants by SNP-based multiplex PCR. In: Plant DNA Fingerprinting and Barcoding. Humana Press, pp 135–147 [DOI] [PubMed]
  86. Li Y, Ding WL. Genetic diversity assessment of Trollius accessions in China by RAPD Markers. Biochem Genet. 2010;48:34–43. doi: 10.1007/s10528-009-9290-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Li L, Yao X, Chen X, Huang H. Development and characterization of microsatellite loci in Chinese medicinal plant Akebia trifoliate ssp. australis and cross-species amplification in closely related taxa. Conserv Genet. 2009;10:959–962. [Google Scholar]
  88. Li Y, Luo HM, Sun C, Song JY, Sun YZ, Wu Q, Wang N, Yao H, Steinmetz A, Chen SL. EST analysis reveals putative genes involved in glycyrrhizin biosynthesis. BMC Genom. 2010;11:268. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liao L, Liu J, Dai Y, Li Q, Xie M, Chen Q, Yin H, Qiu G, Liu X. Development and application of SCAR markers for sex identification in the dioecious species Ginkgo biloba L. Euphytica. 2009;169:49–55. [Google Scholar]
  90. Liu J, Wang L, Geng Y, Wang Q, Luo L, Zhong Y. Genetic diversity and population structure of Lamiophlomis rotate (Lamiaceae), an endemic species of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Genetica. 2006;128:385–394. doi: 10.1007/s10709-006-7517-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Mace ES, Lester RN, Gebhradt CG. AFLP analysis of genetic relationship in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae) Theor Appl Genet. 1999;99:642–648. doi: 10.1007/s001220051278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mahar KS, Rana TS, Ranade SA, Pande V, Palni LMS. Estimation of genetic variability and population structure in Sapindus trifoliatus L., using DNA fingerprinting methods. Trees. 2013;27:85–96. [Google Scholar]
  93. Marroni F, Pinosio S, Di Centa E, Jurman I, Boerjan W, Felice N, Cattonaro F, Morgante M. Large scale detection of rare variants via pooled multiplexed next generation sequencing: towards next generation Ecotilling. Plant J. 2011;67:736–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04627.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Martin KP, Pradeep AK, Madassery J. High frequency in vitro propagation of Trichopus zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus using branch–petiole explants. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33:1141–1148. [Google Scholar]
  95. Mathur A, Mathur AK, Sangwan RS, Gangwar A, Uniyal GC. Differential morphogenetic responses, ginsenoside metabolism and RAPD patterns of three Panax species. Gen Resour Crop Evol. 2003;50:245–252. [Google Scholar]
  96. McGregor CE, Lambert CA, Greyling MM, Louw JH, Warnich L. A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and SSR) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm. Euphytica. 2000;113:135–144. [Google Scholar]
  97. Mehrotra S, Khwaja O, Kukreja AK, Rahman L. ISSR and RAPD based evaluation of genetic stability of encapsulated micro shoots of Glycyrrhiza glabra following 6 months of storage. Mol Biotechnol. 2012;52:262–268. doi: 10.1007/s12033-011-9491-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Michalczyk IM, Schumacher C, Mengel C, Leyer I, Liepelt S. Identification and characterization of 12 microsatellite loci in Cnidium dubium (Apiaceae) using next-generation sequencing. Am J Bot. 2011;98:127–129. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Mignouna HD, Asiedu R, Ng NQ, Knox M, Ellis NTH (1997) Analysis of genetic diversity in Guinea yams (Dioscorea spp.) using AFLP fingerprinting. In: 11th Symp Soc Trop Root Crops. Trinidad and Tobago, pp 70
  100. Mohanty S, Parida R, Singh S, Joshi RK, Subudhi E, Nayak S. Biochemical and molecular profiling of micropropagated and conventionally grown Kaempferia galanga. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2011;106:39–46. [Google Scholar]
  101. Mohapatra KP, Sehgal RN, Sharma RK, Mohapatra T. Genetic analysis and conservation of endangered medicinal tree species Taxus wallichiana in the Himalayan region. New For. 2009;37:109–121. [Google Scholar]
  102. Moraes RM, Lata H, Sumyanto J, Pereira AM, Bertoni BW, Joshi VC, Pugh ND, Khan IA, Pasco DS. Characterization and pharmacological properties of in vitro propagated clones of Echinacea tennesseensis (Beadle) Small. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2011;106:309–315. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mukherjee PK, Wahile A. Integrated approaches towards drug development from Ayurveda and other Indian system of medicines. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Muluvi GM, Sprent JI, Soranzo N, Provan J, Odee D, Folkard G, McNicol JW, Powell W. Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of genetic variation in Moringa oleifera Lam. Mol Ecol. 1999;8:463–470. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Murata J, Roepke J, Gordon H, Luca VD. The leaf epidermome of Catharanthus roseus reveals its biochemical specialization. Plant Cell. 2008;20:524–542. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.056630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Myles S, Chia J-M, Hurwitz B, Simon C, Zhong GY, Buckler E, Ware D. Rapid genomic characterization of the genus Vitis. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:8219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Narula A, Kumar S, Srivastava PS. Genetic fidelity of in vitro regenerants, encapsulation of shoot tips and high diosgenin content in Dioscorea bulbifera L., a potential alternative source of diosgenin. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29:623–629. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9276-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Negi MS, Singh A, Lakshmikumaran M. Genetic variation and relationship among and within Withania species as revealed by AFLP markers. Genome. 2000;43:975–980. doi: 10.1139/gen-43-6-975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Niu L, Mantri N, Li CG, Xue C, Pang E. Array-based techniques for fingerprinting medicinal herbs. Chin Med. 2011;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-6-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Nongrum I, Kumar S, Kumaria S, Tandon P. Genetic variation and gene flow estimation of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. F- A threatened insectivorous plant of India as revealed by RAPD markers. J Crop Sci Biotech. 2012;15:101–105. [Google Scholar]
  111. Padmesh P, Reji JV, Dhar MJ, Seeni S. Estimation of genetic diversity in varieties of Mucuna pruriens using RAPD. Biol Plant. 2006;50:367–372. [Google Scholar]
  112. Parks M, Cronn R, Liston A. Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. BMC Biol. 2009;7:84. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G, Motto M. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet. 1998;97:1248–1255. [Google Scholar]
  114. Phillips RL, Kaeppler SM, Olhoft P. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5222–5226. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Plaschke J, Ganal MW, Roder MS. Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91:1001–1007. doi: 10.1007/BF00223912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Prathepha P, Baimai V. Genetic differentiation in Thai populations of the rare species Afgekia sericea Craib (Leguminosae) revealed by RAPD-PCR assays. Genetica. 1999;105:193–202. doi: 10.1023/A:1003762802997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Qin J, Leung FC, Fung Y, Zhu D, Lin B. Rapid authentication of ginseng species using microchip electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;381:812–819. doi: 10.1007/s00216-004-2889-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Qiu YX, Zong M, Yao Y, Chen BL, Zhou XL, Chen ZL, Fu CX. Genetic variation in wild and cultivated rhizoma corydalis revealed by ISSRs markers. Planta Med. 2009;75:94–98. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1088365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rahimmalek M, Bahreininejad B, Khorrami M. Tabatabaei BES (2009), Genetic variability and geographic differentiation in Thymus daenensis subsp. daenensis, an endangered medicinal plant, as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Biochem Genet. 2009;47:831–842. doi: 10.1007/s10528-009-9281-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rahimmalek M, Tabatabaei BES, Arzani A, Khorrami M. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for genomic analysis of yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) Genes & Genomics. 2011;33:475–482. [Google Scholar]
  121. Rajkumar S, Singh SK, Nag A, Ahuja PS. Genetic structure of Indian valerian (Valeriana jatamansi) populations in Western Himalaya revealed by AFLP. Biochem Genet. 2011;49:674–681. doi: 10.1007/s10528-011-9448-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Ramesh M, Vijayakumar K, Karthikeyan A, Pandian S. RAPD based genetic stability analysis among micropropagated, synthetic seed derived and hardened plants of Bacopa monnieri (L.): a threatened Indian medicinal herb. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33:163–171. [Google Scholar]
  123. Rana S, Dhar N, Bhat WW, Razdan S, Khan S, Dhar RS, Dutt P, Lattoo SK. A 12-deoxywithastramonolide-rich somaclonal variant in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal: molecular cytogenetic analysis and significance as a chemotypic resource. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2012;48:546–554. [Google Scholar]
  124. Ranade SA, Nair KN, Srivastava AP, Pushpangadan P. Analysis of diversity amongst widely distributed and endemic Atalantia (family Rutaceae) species from Western Ghats of India. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2009;15:211–224. doi: 10.1007/s12298-009-0025-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Rathore MS, Chikara J, Mastan SG, Rahman H, Anand KGV, Shekhawat NS. Assessment of genetic stability and instability of tissue culture-propagated plantlets of Aloe vera L. by RAPD and ISSR markers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;165:1356–1365. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9352-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Rawat JM, Rawat B, Mehrotra S, Chandra A, Nautiyal S. ISSR and RAPD based evaluation of genetic fidelity and active ingredient analysis of regenerated plants of Picrorhiza kurroa. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013;35:1797–1805. [Google Scholar]
  127. Richard I, Beckman JS. How neutral are synonymous codon mutations? Nat Genet. 1995;10:259. doi: 10.1038/ng0795-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Rischer H, Oresi M, Seppanen-Laakso T, Katajamaa M, Lammertyn F, et al. Gene-to metabolic networks for terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5614–5619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601027103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Rout GR. Evaluation of genetic relationship in Typhonium species through random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Biol Plant. 2006;50:127–130. [Google Scholar]
  130. Ruzicka J, Lukas B, Merza L, Gohler I, Abel G, Popp M, Novak J. Identification of Verbena officinalis based on ITS sequence analysis and RAPD-derived molecular markers. Planta Med. 2009;75:1271–1276. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Samantaray S, Maiti S. An assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants of Chlorophytum borivilianum using RAPD markers. Biol Plant. 2010;54:334–338. [Google Scholar]
  132. Sangwan NS, Yadav U, Sangwan RS. Genetic diversity among elite varieties of the aromatic grasses, Cymbopogon martini. Euphytica. 2003;130:117–130. [Google Scholar]
  133. Sarwat M, Das S, Srivastava PS. Analysis of genetic diversity through AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers in Tribulus terrestris, a medicinal herb. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:519–528. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0478-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sathiyamoorthy S, In JG, Gayathri S, Kim YJ, Yang DC. Generation and gene ontology based analysis of expressed sequence tags (EST) from a Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer roots. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:3465–3472. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9938-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Satya P, Karan M, Sarkar D, Sinha MK. Genome synteny and evolution of AABB allotetraploids in Hibiscus section Furcaria revealed by interspecific hybridization, ISSR and SSR markers. Plant Syst Evol. 2012;298:1257–1270. [Google Scholar]
  136. Schlag EM, McIntosh MS. RAPD-based assessment of genetic relationships among and within American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) populations and their implications for a future conservation strategy. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012;59:1553–1568. [Google Scholar]
  137. Schlotterer C, Tautz D. Slippage synthesis of simple sequence DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:2211–2215. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.2.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Selvaraj D, Sarma RK, Ramalingam SK. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast matK gene from Zingiberaceae for plant DNA barcoding. Bioinformation. 2008;3:24–27. doi: 10.6026/97320630003024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Sharma K, Agrawal V, Sarika G, Kumar R, Prasad M. ISSR marker-assisted selection of male and female plants in a promising dioecious crop: jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2008;2:239–243. [Google Scholar]
  140. Sharma R, Chowdhury V, Jain S, Jain RK. A comparative study of genetic relationships among and within male and female genotypes of dioecious jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis L. Schneider) using RAPD and ISSR markers. Asian J Hortic. 2009;4:184–193. [Google Scholar]
  141. Shi W, Yang CF, Chen JM, Guo YH. Genetic variation among wild and cultivated populations of the Chinese medicinal plant Coptis chinensis (Ranunculaceae) Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2008;10:485–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Shilpha J, Silambarasan T, Pandian SK, Ramesh M. Assessment of genetic diversity in Solanum trilobatum L., an important medicinal plant from South India using RAPD and ISSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2013;60:807–818. [Google Scholar]
  143. Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, Zaita N, Chunwongse J, Obokata J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Ohto C, Torazawa K, Meng BY, Sugita M, Deno H, Kamogashira T, Yamada K, Kusuda J, Takaiwa F, Kato A, Tohdoh N, Shimada H, Sugiura M. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 1986;5:2043–2049. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04464.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Shukla N, Sangwan NS, Misra HO, Sangwan RS. Genetic diversity analysis in Boerhavia diffusa L. of different geographic locations in India using RAPD markers. Gen Resour Crop Evol. 2003;50:587–601. [Google Scholar]
  145. Siju S, Dhanya K, Syamkumar S, Sasikumar B, Sheeja TE, Bhat AI, Parthasarathy VA. Development, characterization and cross species amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers from expressed sequence tags of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Mol Biotechnol. 2010;44:140–147. doi: 10.1007/s12033-009-9222-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Singh A, Negi MS, Rajagopal J, Bhatia S, Tomar UK, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M. Assessment of genetic diversity in Azadirachta indica using AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;99:272–279. [Google Scholar]
  147. Singh A, Negi MS, Moses VK, Venkateswarlu B, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M. Molecular analysis of micropropagated neem plants using AFLP markers for ascertaining clonal fidelity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2002;38:519–524. [Google Scholar]
  148. Sobrino B, Briona M, Carracedoa A. SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154:181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Soleimani VD, Baum BR, Johnson DA. Efficient validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in plants by allele-specific PCR, with an example from barley. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2003;21:281–288. [Google Scholar]
  150. Song J, Yao H, Li Y, Li X, Lin Y, Liu C, Han J, Xie C, Chen S. Authentication of the family Polygonaceae in Chinese Pharmacopoeiaby DNA barcoding technique. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Soni M, Kaur R. Rapid in vitro propagation, conservation and analysis of genetic stability of Viola pilosa. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2014;20:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s12298-013-0200-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Su H, Wang L, Ge Y, Feng E, Sun J, Liu L. Development of strain-specific SCAR markers for authentication of Ganoderma lucidum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:1223–1226. [Google Scholar]
  153. Sunyaev S, Hanke J, Aydin A, Wirkner U, Zastrow I, Reich J, Bork P. Prediction of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in human disease-associated genes. J Mol Med. 1999;77:754–760. doi: 10.1007/s001099900059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sze SC, Zhang KY, Shaw PC, But PP, Ng TB, Tong Y. A DNA microarray for differentiation of (Fengdou Shihu) by its 5S ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer region. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2008;49:149–154. doi: 10.1042/BA20070059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Tamhankar S, Ghate V, Raut A, Rajput B. Molecular profiling of “Chirayat” complex using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Planta Med. 2009;75:1266–1270. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Tang SQ, Bin XY, Peng YT, Zhou JY, Wang L, Zhong Y. Assessment of genetic diversity in cultivars and wild accessions of Luohanguo (Siraitia grosvenorii [Swingle] AM Lu et ZY Zhang), a species with edible and medicinal sweet fruits endemic to southern China, using RAPD and AFLP markers. Gen Resour Crop Evol. 2007;54:1053–1061. [Google Scholar]
  157. Tautz D, Renz M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:4127–4138. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.10.4127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Techen N, Chandra S, Lata H, Elsohly MA, Khan IA. Genetic identification of female Cannabis sativa plants at early developmental stage. Planta Med. 2010;76:1938–1939. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Thul ST, Srivastava AK, Singh SC, Shanker K. Genetic and chemical diversity of high mucilaginous plants of Sida complex by ISSR markers and chemical fingerprinting. Mol Biotechnol. 2011;49:77–81. doi: 10.1007/s12033-011-9380-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Tripathi N, Chouhan DS, Saini N, Tiwari S. Assessment of genetic variations among highly endangered medicinal plant Bacopa monnieri (L.) from Central India using RAPD and ISSR analysis. 3. Biotech. 2012;2:327–336. [Google Scholar]
  161. Tsoi PY, Woo HS, Wong MS, Chen SL, Fong WF, Xiao PG, Yang MS. Genotyping and species identification of Fritillariaby DNA chips. Acta Pharm Sin. 2003;38:185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Varshney A, Anis M. Evaluation of clonal integrity in desert date tree (Balanites aegyptiaca Del.) by inter-simple sequence repeat marker assay. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013;35:2559–2565. [Google Scholar]
  163. Verma S, Rana TS. Genetic relationships among wild and cultivated accessions of curry leaf plant (Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng.), as revealed by DNA fingerprinting methods. Mol Biotechnol. 2013;53:139–149. doi: 10.1007/s12033-012-9500-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:4407–4414. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Wang QM, Wang YZ, Sun LL, Gao FZ, Sun W, He J, Gao X, Wang L. Direct and indirect organogenesis of Clivia miniata and assessment of DNA methylation changes in various regenerated plantlets. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31:1283–1296. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1248-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are usefll as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;18:6531–6535. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Wiriyakarun S, Yodpetch W, Komatsu K, Zhu S, Ruangrungsi N, Sukrong S. Discrimination of the Thai rejuvenating herbs Pueraria candollei (White Kwao Khruea), Butea superba (Red Kwao Khruea), and Mucuna collettii (Black Kwao Khruea) using PCR-RFLP. J Nat Med. 2013;67:562–570. doi: 10.1007/s11418-012-0716-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Xie Z, Kapteyn J, Gang DR. A systems biology investigation of the MEP/terpenoid and shikimate/phenylpropanoid pathways points to multiple levels of metabolic control in sweet basil glandular trichomes. Plant J. 2008;54:349–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Xue CY, Xue HG. Application of real-time scorpion PCR for authentication and quantification of the traditional Chinese medicinal plant Drynaria fortunei. Planta Med. 2008;74:1416–1420. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1081305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Yang W, Bai X, Kabelka E, Eaton C, Kamoun S, van der Knaap E, Francis D. Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Mol Breeding. 2004;14:21–34. [Google Scholar]
  171. Yang JY, Kim HK, Park SJ. Development of genetic marker specific for Korean Hwanggi medicine (Radix Astragali) Food Sci Biotechnol. 2011;20:1561–1567. [Google Scholar]
  172. Yao H, Song JY, Ma XY, Liu C, Li Y, Xu HX, Han JP, Duan LS, Chen SL. Identification of Dendrobium species by a candidate DNA barcode sequence: the chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic region. Planta Med. 2009;75:667–669. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Zerega NJC, Mori S, Lindqvist C, Zheng Q, Motley TJ. Using amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) to identify black Corlosn (Actaea racemosa) Economic Bot. 2002;56:154–164. [Google Scholar]
  174. Zhang Z, Guo M, Zhang J. Identification of AFLP fragments linked to hydroxysafflor yellow A in Flos Carthami and conversion to a SCAR marker for rapid selection. Mol Breeding. 2009;23:229–237. [Google Scholar]
  175. Zhang QS, Xu BL, Liu LD, Yuan QQ, Dong HX, Cheng XH, Lin DL. Analysis of genetic diversity among Chinese Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer cultivars using two molecular marker systems (ISSRs and SRAPs) and morphological traits. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:2237–2248. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1031-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Zhou X, Li Q, Yin Y, Chen Y, Lin J. Identification of medicinal Ganoderma species based on PCR with specific primers and PCR-RFLP. Planta Med. 2008;74:197–200. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Zhou TH, Dong SS, Li S, Zhao GF. Genetic structure within and among populations of Saruma henryi, an endangered plant endemic to China. Biochem Genet. 2012;50:146–158. doi: 10.1007/s10528-011-9488-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Zhu S, Fushimi H, Komatsu K. Development of a DNA microarray for authentication of ginseng drugs based on 18S rRNA gene sequence. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:3953–3959. doi: 10.1021/jf0732814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Zong M, Liu HL, Qiu YX, Yang SZ, Zhao MS, Fu CX. Genetic diversity and geographic differentiation in the threatened species Dysosma pleiantha in China as revealed by ISSR analysis. Biochem Genet. 2008;46:180–196. doi: 10.1007/s10528-007-9141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Zulak KG, Cornish A, Daskalchuk TE, Deyholos MK, Goodenowe DB, et al. Gene transcript and metabolite profiling of elicitor-induced opium poppy cell cultures reveal the coordinate regulation of primary and secondary metabolism. Planta. 2005;225:1085–1106. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0419-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES