Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2014 Jun 11;18(8):835–839. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2014.913572

Activating Human Genes with Zinc Finger Proteins, TALEs, and CRISPR/Cas9 for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine

Charles A Gersbach 1,2,3,*, Pablo Perez-Pinera 1
PMCID: PMC4236187  NIHMSID: NIHMS641486  PMID: 24917359

Abstract

New technologies have recently been developed to control the expression of human genes in their native genomic context by engineering synthetic transcription factors that can be targeted to any DNA sequence. The ability to precisely regulate any gene as it occurs naturally in the genome provides a means to address a variety of diseases and disorders. This approach also circumvents some of the traditional challenges of gene therapy. In this editorial, we review the technologies that have enabled targeted human gene activation, including the engineering of transcription factors based on zinc finger proteins, TALEs, and the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Additionally, we highlight examples in which these methods have been developed for therapeutic applications and discuss challenges and opportunities.

Keywords: gene editing, gene regulation, transcription factor, protein engineering, zinc finger, TAL effector, TALE, CRISPR, Cas9, gene therapy, genetic reprogramming

Introduction

For over 40 years, gene therapy has been proposed as an approach to cure genetic diseases by adding functional copies of genes to the cells of patients with defined genetic mutations. However, this field has been limited by the available technologies for adding extra genetic material to human genomes. More recently, several new technologies have emerged for manipulating genes in their native chromosomal context, including editing of gene sequences and regulating target gene expression. In this editorial, we specifically discuss therapeutic applications of activating human genes for treating genetic diseases and enhancing regenerative medicine strategies.

Technologies for targeted gene regulation

In order to control the expression of specific genes, it is necessary to develop molecular tools that precisely recognize DNA sequences in the context of the 3 billion base pairs of the human genome. Over the past 20 years, scientists have developed several methods for re-engineering naturally occurring proteins to recognize any desired genomic target (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Technologies for engineering programmable DNA-binding proteins, including (A) zinc finger proteins, (B) TALEs, and (C) CRISPR/Cas9. (Top) Representative crystal structures of a (A) zinc finger protein (PDB 1P47) or (B) TALE (PDB UGM) fused to the p65 transcriptional activation domain (PDB 2RAM), or (C) Cas9 (green) bound to a gRNA (blue) and the corresponding DNA target site (brown) (PDB 4OO8). (Bottom) Zinc finger proteins and TALEs recognize their target sequences through non-covalent protein-DNA interactions between 3 bp or 1 bp per repeat domain, respectively. The CRISPR system consists of a complex of the gRNA and the Cas9 protein that recognizes its genomic target sequence by complementary base pairing of the gRNA (spheres) to the chromosomal DNA.

Zinc Finger Transcription Factors

The first such tools developed for this application were based on engineered zinc finger proteins. Zinc finger proteins are the most common class of DNA-binding proteins across all domains of life and recognize specific target sequences through non-covalent interactions of each zinc finger motif with three or four base pairs of DNA. Individual domains can be linked in series to generate arrays that recognize extended sequences (Fig. 1A). Many zinc finger domains that target different sequences have been engineered by rational design or high-throughput selection. Because of the modular nature of the zinc finger arrays, it is possible to exchange zinc finger domains to reprogram the binding specificity of the protein to new sequences. The new targeted DNA-binding proteins can be genetically fused to various actuator domains to generate specific outputs. Fusion to potent transcriptional activation domains, such as the monomer or oligomer of the VP16 acidic transactivator, is commonly used to enhance transcription of target genes (Fig. 1A). The first synthetic transcription factors engineered to activate the expression of endogenous human genes were designed based on this approach.1 Despite many successes of developing particular zinc finger proteins for different applications, some of which are discussed in more detail below, the protein engineering challenges of this approach have thus far prevented widespread adoption of the technology.

Transcription Activator-Like Effectors

More recently, a new class of modular DNA-binding proteins was discovered based on the transcription activator-like effector (TALE) proteins of the plant bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas. Similar to zinc finger proteins, individual domains are linked together in series to determine DNA-binding specificity. But unlike zinc fingers, each modular repeat recognizes only a single base pair of DNA (Fig. 1B). The frequency of successfully engineering functional TALE proteins targeted to new sequences is very high. However, the magnitude of gene activation by these proteins at native chromosomal loci was relatively modest.2, 3 Subsequently, we and others demonstrated that multiple TALE activators targeted to single promoters act synergistically to induce high expression levels of the target genes and their protein products.4, 5

CRISPR/Cas9

Over the past year, a third technology has emerged for facile targeting of specific genomic loci that is based on the CRISPR/CRISPR-associated (Cas) adaptive immunity system in bacteria. In its engineered form, this system comprises a Cas9 endonuclease and a single-stranded guide RNA (gRNA) that forms a complex with Cas9 and targets specific genomic sites based on complementary pairing of a 20 base pair “protospacer” sequence (Fig. 1C). In contrast to zinc finger proteins and TALEs, which require design and assembly of new proteins for each new target site, the CRISPR system requires only the exchange of the 20 base pair protospacer within the gRNA expression cassette. Therefore this system is particularly simple to use and has quickly been implemented for diverse studies. In order to adapt the Cas9 nuclease for targeted gene activation, we and others have fused transcriptional activation domains to a Cas9 mutant in which the nuclease activity has been abolished.6-11 This results in a programmable RNA-guided gene activation system that can be used to control diverse human genes6-11 but does not require protein engineering expertise.

Human gene activation for treating genetic disease

Hundreds of genetic diseases are caused by the mutation of a single gene. The majority of gene therapy efforts are focused on developing curative strategies based on the addition of functional copies of the affected gene or correction of the mutant gene with genome editing technologies. However, many of these genetic defects can also be compensated for by activation of other endogenous genes with similar function (Table 1). For example, sickle cell disease is caused by mutation to the β-globin gene. This mutation can be compensated for by re-activation of the γ-globin gene that has similar function to β-globin but is only expressed during fetal development and is epigenetically silenced during adult life. As a potential therapy for sickle cell disease, γ-globin has been successfully activated by synthetic zinc finger transcription factors.12 In a similar set of studies, zinc finger transcription factors have been used to upregulate the expression of utrophin, which can compensate for the loss of dystrophin expression that occurs in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.13 TALE-based activators targeted to the frataxin gene have also been used to increase expression that is down-regulated in cells from Friedreich's ataxia patients due to a trinucleotide repeat expansion in the first intron.14

Table 1.

Examples of Therapeytic Applications of Engineered Transcriptional Activators

Application Gene Disease Platform Representative Publication
Gene Therapy Compensating for Genetic Defect γ-globin (HBG1/2) Sickle cell disease Zinc finger protein Graslund et al.
Compensating for Genetic Defect Utrophin (UTRN) Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Zinc finger protein Di Certo et al.
Compensating for Genetic Defect Frataxin (FXN) Friedreich's ataxia TALE Chapdelaine, P et al.
Supressing Angiogenesis PEDF (SERPINF1) Choroidal neovascularization Zinc finger protein Yokoi et al.
Inactivating Oncogenes Bax (BAX) Cancer Zinc finger protein Falke et al.
Activating Silenced Tumor Supressors Maspin (SERPINB5) Cancer Zinc finger protein Beltran et al., Lara et al.

Regenerative Medicine Tissue Regeneration VEGF-A (VEGFA) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, diabetic wounds, and others Zinc finger protein Rebar et al.
Genetic Reprogramming Oct-4 (POU5F1) Patient-specific cell therapy Zinc finger protein, TALE Bultmann et al., Gao et al.

In addition to monogenic hereditary diseases, other complex genetic diseases, such as cancer and pathologic neovascularization, can potentially be treated by activation of single genes. For example, the tumor suppressor maspin is epigenetically silenced in several types of epithelial tumors. Re-activation of maspin with zinc finger transcription factors reduced tumor cell invasion in vitro and tumor xenograft growth in vivo.15 In another study, zinc finger transcription factors that activated the expression of the pro-apoptotic factor Bax induced cell death selectively in cancer cells with inactivation of the tumor suppressor p53, but not in cells with normal p53.16

Pathological neovascularization occurs during the course of several diseases and often results from an imbalance between stimulators and inhibitors of angiogenesis. Whereas many therapeutic efforts focus on inhibiting the angiogenic factor VEGF, inducing expression of the anti-angiogenic factor PEDF using zinc finger transcription factors provides a protective response in choroidal neovascularization due to inhibition of multiple pro-angiogenic growth factors simultaneously.17

Human gene activation for regenerative medicine

Beyond compensation for genetic defects, precise control of endogenous gene expression can provide a means for enhancing tissue regeneration and directing cell lineage specification (Table 1). For example, upregulation of multiple VEGF isoforms expressed from the endogenous gene by zinc finger transcription factors stimulated improved angiogenesis and wound healing relative to overexpression of a single VEGF isoform, presumably due to more accurately recapitulating natural VEGF signaling.18 This approach was later explored in phase II clinical trials for treating both diabetic neuropathy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

One of the most notable applications of modulating cellular gene expression has been the development of genetic reprogramming to redirect cell lineage specification, including the reprogramming of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and direct conversion between cell phenotypes. The genetic reprogramming of cell fate may ultimately form the basis of patient-specific cell therapies. These strategies rely on the forced expression of master transcription factors that govern lineage-specific gene regulatory networks. Typically, complete reprogramming is defined as the irreversible activation of the endogenous promoters that control these master transcription factors that occurs as part of the global reprogramming of the lineage-specific gene regulatory network. In attempts to increase the frequency, speed, or robustness of reprogramming, recent studies have replaced lineage-specific master transcription factors with synthetic transcription factors targeted to the promoters that control the genes encoding the master factor. For example, TALE transcription factors targeted to the mouse Oct-4 promoter in neural stem cells induced the expression of both Oct-4 and its downstream target Nanog, although only in the presence of DNA methyltransferases or histone deacetylases inhibitors.19 Subsequently, another study showed that by targeting TALE transcriptional activators to the mouse Oct-4 enhancers, in contrast to the promoter, these synthetic transcription factors could substitute for Oct-4 overexpression in the reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts to iPSCs.20 Similar results were achieved by targeting Nanog enhancers in epiblast stem cells.

Expert opinion

As described above, the potential for activation of endogenous human genes in the development of innovative therapeutics is immense. Although a few examples have been demonstrated with the early technologies for engineering synthetic transcription factors, these approaches can be expanded to address a diverse range of diseases and conditions. Furthermore, the recent developments in engineering synthetic transcription factors will rapidly advance the pace of success in this field. For example, the ability to engineer new transcription factors by simply exchanging short 20 bp targeting sequences of the CRISPR/Cas system will facilitate the parallel testing of many new synthetic gene activators without the need for protein engineering expertise.6-11 Similarly, the demonstration of synergistic gene activation by multiple transcription factors has provided insights for achieving results that are significantly more robust than previous methods with single factors.4, 5

However, several challenges remain. It is not clear how to best deliver many factors to activate a single gene to achieve synergistic effects, particularly when working with the highly recombinogenic TALE-encoding DNA sequences. Additionally, exogenous regulation of the synthetic transcription factors may be critical to ensuring safety and efficacy, particularly for applications requiring dynamic control of gene expression. Systems that provide chemical control, or more recently light-based control with optogenetic methods, are examples of advances being made in this area. Enzymatic domains that provide more specific or precise manipulation of genomic regulation, such as epigenetic modifiers of histone marks and DNA methylation, will also enable new strategies for gene regulation. Other important remaining challenges to achieving clinical efficacy include determining optimal delivery methods, characterizing the specificity of gene regulation, assessing immunogenicity of the synthetic proteins involved in each system, and improving the robustness of the effects generated by the synthetic factors.

The significant advances made in the last year in technologies for activating human genes are already rapidly accelerating the pace at which these methods are applied to the preclinical development of human therapeutics. Although significant challenges still exist, parallel advances in the fields of gene therapy, immunology, genetics, and genomics are providing solutions for overcoming these obstacles. Consequently it will not be surprising if promising therapeutic candidates based on targeted gene activation emerge in the near future. At a minimum, we expect that the technologies will enable the discovery of novel targets that could then be addressed by more conventional strategies.

Acknowledgements

We apologize to authors of relevant works that were not cited here due to space restrictions. We also thank the lab members and collaborators that contributed to our efforts in this area. This work was supported by a US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's New Innovator Award (DP2OD008586), National Science Foundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award (CBET-1151035), NIH R01DA036865, NIH R03AR061042, and an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant (10SDG3060033).

References

  • 1.Beerli RR, Dreier B, Barbas CF., 3rd Positive and negative regulation of endogenous genes by designed transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:1495–1500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040552697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang F, Cong L, Lodato S, Kosuri S, et al. Efficient construction of sequence-specific TAL effectors for modulating mammalian transcription. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:149–153. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:143–148. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perez-Pinera P, Ousterout DG, Brunger JM, Farin AM, et al. Synergistic and tunable human gene activation by combinations of synthetic transcription factors. Nat Methods. 2013;10:239–242. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maeder ML, Linder SJ, Reyon D, Angstman JF, et al. Robust, synergistic regulation of human gene expression using TALE activators. Nat Methods. 2013;10:243–245. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell. 2013;154:442–451. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perez-Pinera P, Kocak DD, Vockley CM, Adler AF, et al. RNA-guided gene activation by CRISPR-Cas9-based transcription factors. Nat Methods. 2013;10:973–976. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maeder ML, Linder SJ, Cascio VM, Fu Y, et al. CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes. Nat Methods. 2013;10:977–979. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mali P, Aach J, Stranges PB, Esvelt KM, et al. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:833–838. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng AW, Wang H, Yang H, Shi L, et al. Multiplexed activation of endogenous genes by CRISPR-on, an RNA-guided transcriptional activator system. Cell Res. 2013;23:1163–1171. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farzadfard F, Perli SD, Lu TK. Tunable and Multifunctional Eukaryotic Transcription Factors Based on CRISPR/Cas. ACS synthetic biology. 2013 doi: 10.1021/sb400081r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Graslund T, Li X, Magnenat L, Popkov M, Barbas CF., 3rd Exploring strategies for the design of artificial transcription factors: targeting sites proximal to known regulatory regions for the induction of gamma-globin expression and the treatment of sickle cell disease. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3707–3714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406809200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Di Certo MG, Corbi N, Strimpakos G, Onori A, et al. The artificial gene Jazz, a transcriptional regulator of utrophin, corrects the dystrophic pathology in mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:752–760. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chapdelaine P, Coulombe Z, Chikh A, Gerard C, Tremblay JP. A Potential New Therapeutic Approach for Friedreich Ataxia: Induction of Frataxin Expression With TALE Proteins. Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids. 2013;2:e119. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2013.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beltran A, Parikh S, Liu Y, Cuevas BD, et al. Re-activation of a dormant tumor suppressor gene maspin by designed transcription factors. Oncogene. 2007;26:2791–2798. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Falke D, Fisher M, Ye D, Juliano RL. Design of artificial transcription factors to selectively regulate the pro-apoptotic bax gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gng010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yokoi K, Zhang HS, Kachi S, Balaggan KS, et al. Gene transfer of an engineered zinc finger protein enhances the anti-angiogenic defense system. Mol Ther. 2007;15:1917–1923. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rebar EJ, Huang Y, Hickey R, Nath AK, et al. Induction of angiogenesis in a mouse model using engineered transcription factors. Nat Med. 2002;8:1427–1432. doi: 10.1038/nm1202-795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bultmann S, Morbitzer R, Schmidt CS, Thanisch K, et al. Targeted transcriptional activation of silent oct4 pluripotency gene by combining designer TALEs and inhibition of epigenetic modifiers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:5368–5377. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao X, Yang J, Tsang JC, Ooi J, et al. Reprogramming to Pluripotency Using Designer TALE Transcription Factors Targeting Enhancers. Stem cell reports. 2013;1:183–197. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES