Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 24;5:4907. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5907

Dynamic GATA4 enhancers shape the chromatin landscape central to heart development and disease

Aibin He 1,2,*,†, Fei Gu 1,*, Yong Hu 1, Qing Ma 1, Lillian Yi Ye 1, Jennifer A Akiyama 3,4, Axel Visel 3,4, Len A Pennacchio 3,4, William T Pu 1,5,†
PMCID: PMC4236193  NIHMSID: NIHMS619134  PMID: 25249388

Abstract

How stage-specific enhancer dynamics modulate gene expression patterns essential for organ development, homesostasis, and disease is not well understood. Here, we addressed this question by mapping chromatin occupancy of GATA4—a master cardiac transcription factor—in heart development and disease. We find that GATA4 binds and participaes in establishing active chromatin regions by stimulating H3K27ac deposition, which facilitates GATA4-driven gene expression. GATA4 chromatin occupancy changes markedly between fetal and adult heart, with a limitted binding sites overlap. Cardiac stress restored GATA4 occupancy to a subset of fetal sites, but many stress-associated GATA4 binding sites localized to loci not occupied by GATA4 during normal heart development. Collectively, our data show that dynamic, context-specific transcription factors occupancy underlies stage-specific events in development, homeostasis, and disease.

Introduction

Transcription factors (TFs) drive spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression that control the development of organs and their responses to disease. How TFs are redeployed to regulate distinct stage-specific gene expression programs is not well understood. A fundamental step towards answering this question is to delineate dynamic changes in TF occupancy and chromatin context in development and disease.

Development of the heart is orchestrated by a set of cardiac TFs. In adult heart disease, many of the same TFs regulate the heart's stress responses1. Indeed, many fetally expressed genes are re-expressed in adult heart disease, and this has been interpreted as disease-induced reactivation of a fetal transcriptional program. To gain insights into how cardiac TF activity is regulated to drive stage-specific transcriptional program, we studied the master cardiac TF GATA4, which is required in the heart from cardiomyocyte specification through adulthood2–7.

Using a knock-in allele of GATA4 that is biotinylated in vivo to permit high affinity GATA4 pulldown8, we mapped the changes in GATA4 chromatin occupancy that occur between fetal versus adult heart. GATA4 bound to loci with active chromatin signatures, and indeed GATA4 contributed to establishing this active chromatin signature by stimulating H3K27ac deposition, which facilitated GATA4-driven gene activation. Furthermore, our data revealed that some GATA4 binding sites are maintained between fetal and adult heart, but that most change dynamically between developmental stages. GATA4 occupancy studies of control versus pressure overloaded adult heart similarly showed that some fetal GATA4 bound regions were restored in cardiac hypertrophy, but most hypertrophy-induced GATA4 regions were newly established elements of an adult hypertrophic transcriptional program.

RESULTS

Identification of GATA4 regulated enhancers in fetal heart

We previously reported an allele of GATA4 in which the endogenous gene has been modified to incorporate FLAG and bio (flbio) epitope tags8,9, where bio is a 23 amino acid sequence specifically biotinylated by the enzyme BirA10. In GATA4flbio/flbio::Rosa26BirA/+ mice, GATA4flbio is pulled down with high affinity onto immobilized streptavidin. The GATA4flbio allele retains full or nearly full activity11. Using this high affinity system, we identified GATA4 peaks in E12.5 heart ventricles by bioChIP-seq. In each of two biological duplicate samples, we identified over 50,000 GATA4-bound regions (hereafter referred to as GATA4 regions), with 43,800 (85.0%) shared between the duplicates (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Data 1). 50.8% of these regions overlapped with GATA4flbio binding sites in HL1 cardiomyocyte-like cells.8 We also performed GATA4 antibody-based ChIP-seq and found that it was less sensitive, identifying 11,915 (72.7%) regions that were shared between biological duplicates (Fig. 1a). 11,561 of these regions (97%) were also enriched by the GATA4 bioChIP-seq. We refer to these peaks shared between all four samples as high confidence fetal GATA4 regions.

Figure 1. GATA4 regulates genes expression through GATA4 bound enhancers during embryonic heart development.

(a) Identification of GATA4 peaks in embryonic E12.5 heart through GATA4 bioChIP-seq and GATA4 antibody-based ChIP-seq. (b) p300 ChIP-seq reads13 from heart and midbrain near GATA4 peaks in embryonic heart. There was significantly greater enrichment of heart p300 signal near GATA4 peaks compared to brain p300 signal. (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). (c) Overlapping of GATA4 enriched genes with genes down-regulated in E12.5 cTNT-Cre::G4fl/fl embryonic heart. Gene expression was measured by RNA-seq. (d) Visualization of GATA4 ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data tracks. G4fb, bio-tagged GATA4-based ChIP-seq; G4Ab, GATA4 antibody-based ChIP-seq. Dashed box indicates a distal high confidence GATA4 region associated with Ednra.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

GATA4 interacts with the transcriptional co-activator and histone acetyltransferase p30012, and GATA4 enhances p300 recruitment to chromatin loci8. Therefore, we asked if heart p300 binding sites13 were over-represented near high confidence fetal heart GATA4 peaks (Fig. 1b). Indeed, heart p300 ChIP-seq reads were strongly enriched on GATA4 peaks, but midbrain p300 ChIP-seq reads were not (Fig. 1b; p=2.0E-10). Because the fetal p300-bound regions were predictive of fetal heart enhancer activity13, these data indicate that GATA4 regions contain functional transcriptional enhancers. These data extend this work to provide unbiased, genome-wide support for GATA4 recruitment of p300 to heart enhancers.

Identifying genes directly activated by GATA4

We used RNA-seq on E12.5 cTNT-Cre::Gata4fl/fl (G4CKO) and control heart ventricles to identify genes regulated downstream of GATA4. There were 1720 differentially expressed genes (log2 fold change >0.5). GATA4 promoted expression of 726 genes (i.e., downregulated in loss of GATA4), and 211 of them were associated with one or more GATA4 regions (p < 7.99E-04) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Data 2). These 211 genes are likely to be directly activated by GATA4, and their 511 associated GATA4 regions are candidate GATA4-dependent enhancers. The 211 genes were over-represented for Gene Ontology (GO) terms linked to heart and muscle development (Supplementary Fig. 1a). One example is Ednra, encoding an endothelin receptor, which was downregulated 2-fold in GATA4 loss of function and was linked to a strong GATA4 region 264 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS; Fig. 1d) as well as two additional intergenic peaks downstream of Ednra (not shown). In addition, 422 genes that were bound by GATA4 and up-regulated in G4CKO heart ventricles (Supplementary Fig. 1b), suggestive of direct GATA4-mediated repression. These 422 genes were over-represented for genes with functional annotations related to heart and vasculature development (Supplementary Fig. 1c).

To evalaute the prediction that GATA4 regions linked to the 211 GATA4-activated genes are functional transcriptional enhancers, we tested 12 candidates linked to 4 genes (Ednra, Hey2, Kcne1, and Hopx) in transient transgenic enhancer assays. 7 of these 12 enhancers (58.3%) were active in the heart (Table 1; Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2), although the activity of one of these, Hey2-8, was confined to non-cardiomyocytes of the outflow tract cushion. We previously tested putative enhancers based on multiple transcription factor occupancy in cardiomyocyte-like HL1 cells, and one of these tested enhancers met the criteria used to select enhancers for this study8. This enhancer also exhibited strong heart transcriptional activity. Overall, a GATA4 region linked to gene downregulation in G4CKO predicted heart enhancer activity (8/13, 61.5%), comparable to the frequency of p300-bound regions with heart enhancer activity (62.3%, ref. 14). The highest frequency of heart enhancer activity occurred for regions bound by both GATA4 and p300 (8/9, 88.9%).

Table 1.

List of selected enhancers tested in the transient transgenic enhancer assay.

Gene ID Dist to TSS (bp) Activity G4 dependent
Ednra 1 834 Negative
Ednra 2 16489 Negative
Ednra 3 52246 Heart& Face
Ednra 172 −264084 Heart No*
Hey2 4 −386564 Heart
Hey2 5 −210660 Heart
Hey2 6 −192203 Somites
Hey2 7 −430592 Heart
Hey2 8 −155535 Heart-oft
Hey2 9 −185613 Negative
Kcne1 10 14167 Heart
Kcne1 11 18063 Midbrain
Hopx 12 −35428 Heart
Wisp1 104 −76686 Heart Yes
Ssh2 146 160814 Heart Yes
Smarcd3 13 −3000 Heart Yes**
Open in a new tab

ID numbers over 100 were obtained from the VISTA enhancer browser31 and number 13 was reported previously8. "Heart-oft" indicates selective activity in the outflow tract of the heart. “G4 dependent” indicates effect of GATA site mutation on in vivo enhancer activity (Fig. 2b).

*

a residual GATA site with marginal GATA4 occupancy was left unmutated.

**

GATA site requirement was unmasked by TBX5 binding site mutation.8

Figure 2. Selected GATA4 distal regions tested for enhancer activity in E11.5 transgenic embryos.

(a) Enhancer-hsp68-lacZ constructs were used to generate E11.5 transgenic embryos. Red bars denote GATA4 regions with heart enhancer activity, while black bars indicate GATA4 regions without heart enhancer activity. Numbers above line indicate the region ID number shown in panel A. Numbers below line indicate the number of embryos with heart activity and the total number of transgenic embryos examined. n, negative for activity in heart. (b) GATA motif mutation in GATA4 heart enhancers reduced their transcriptional activity. GATA motif mutation in Wisp1 and Ssh2 enhancers ablated cardiac activity. For Ednra-172, mutation of 4 of 5 GATA motifs did not impair heart activity (*).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

We next asked if GATA4 binding is essential for activity of these GATA4-occupied enhancers. We mutated the consensus GATA4 motifs found under the high confidence GATA4 peaks of 3 enhancers (Ednra-172, Wisp1, and Ssh2) with heart activity (Table 1). Mutation of the GATA motifs in the Wisp1 and Ssh2 enhancers ablated cardiac enhancer activity (Fig. 2b). However, mutation of the GATA motif in Ednra-172 did not (Fig. 2b), although the mutated enhancer tested still contained an additional GATA motif with significant GATA4 occupancy by bioChIP-seq. We previously reported on the in vivo GATA4-dependence of a fourth region related to Smarcd38, where mutation of both a GATA4 and a TBX5 motif blocked enhancer activity. In summary, GATA motifs were essential for the heart activity of three of four tested GATA4-bound heart enhancers (Table 1).

GATA4 promotes deposition of H3K27ac at distal enhancers

Fetal GATA4 predominantly binds to distal transcriptional enhancer sequences that are enriched in p300 occupancy. p300 acetylates histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac), a major active transcriptional enhancer15,16 mark. We hypothesized that an important mechanism by which GATA4 promotes cardiac gene transcription is through GATA4-dependent H3K27ac deposition. To test this hypothesis, we defined the genome-wide chromatin occupancy of H3K27ac in E12.5 heart ventricle by ChIP-seq. There was extensive overlap between distal H3K27ac and GATA4 chromatin occupancy (Fig. 3a), as well as substantial overlap (76.3%) between their associated genes (Fig. 3b). Regions bound by both GATA4 and H3K27ac were linked to heart development GO terms (orange bars, Fig. 3c), while those bound by each factor alone were not.

Figure 3. GATA4 promotes deposition of H3K27ac at distal regulatory regions.

(a) Aggregation plot showing GATA4 enrichment near H3K27ac regions in E12.5 heart ventricle. (b) Overlap of genes associated with fetal distal GATA4 and H3K27ac peaks. (c) GO term analysis of genes associated with distal regions occupied by GATA4 and/or H3K27ac. Orange highlight GO terms related to heart. (d) Box plot shows expression of genes with distal regions occupied by GATA4 and/or H3K27ac. (e) GATA4-bound genes were grouped by their expression level. The peak enrichment of the associated H3K27ac and GATA4 regions was plotted. (f) Genes directly activated by GATA4 were most highly enriched for H3K27ac, and gene expression changes in GATA4 inactivation (GATA4fl/fl::TNT-Cre heart ventricle RNA-seq) correlated with H3K27ac but did not closely correlate with GATA4 binding strength. (g) H3K27ac ChIP-seq was performed in GATA4fl/fl and GATA4fl/fl::TNT-Cre heart ventricles. The plot shows H3K27ac signal at distal GATA4 regions, with regions ordered by the ratio of the H3K27ac signal in Gata4 mutant compared to wild type. Decreased or increased H3K27ac was defined as log2(KO/WT) < 0.5 or > 0.5, respectively. (h) Ten GATA4+ H3K27ac+ distal regions, one proximal promoter (Smarcd3), and an intergenic control were monitored for H3K27ac enrichment by ChIP-qPCR . GATA4 loss-of-function used GATA4fl/fl and Gata4fl/fl::TNT-Cre fetal heart ventricle, and gain-of-function used HL1 cardiomyocyte-like cells overexpressing GATA4flbio. Underlined genes were directly activated by GATA4 (Fig. 1c). d-f, Mann-Whitney test; h, t-test. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001. Error bars show s.e.m.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

We evaluated the relationship of distal GATA4 or H3K27ac occupancy to the expression of associated genes. The most highly expressed group of genes was associated with distal regions enriched for both GATA4 and H3K27ac (Fig. 3d). Genes with distal regions enriched for H3K27ac but not GATA4 were expressed at nearly the same level. In comparison, genes with distal regions enriched for GATA4 but not H3K27ac were expressed at lower levels, and genes with distal regions lacking either feature were the lowest expressed. Increasing expression of GATA4-bound genes correlated with higher H3K27ac enrichment but not with the degree of GATA4 binding (Fig. 3e). In fact, fetal heart genes directly activated by GATA4 (bound by GATA4 and downregulated in G4CKO) had significantly higher H3K27ac enrichment than genes unaffected or repressed by GATA4 (Fig. 3f). In comparison, GATA4 enrichment was not substantially different between genes activated, repressed, or unaffected in G4CKO (Fig. 3f). Together, these data indicate that H3K27ac but not GATA4 signal strength associates with higher gene expression.

To test the hypothesis that distal GATA4 occupancy promotes H3K27ac deposition, we measured the effect of cardiomyocyte-specific loss of GATA4 on H3K27ac chromatin occupancy (Fig. 3g). H3K27ac ChIP-seq on E12.5 G4CKO or control (Gata4fl/fl) heart ventricles demonstrated marked reduction of H3K27ac at 73.3% of fetal distal GATA4 regions, compared to H3K27ac increase at only 5.2% of these regions (Fig. 3g; Fisher exact P < 8.95E-321). We confirmed this result by preparing chromatin from independent E12.5 G4CKO or control heart ventricles and measuring H3K27ac enrichment by ChIP-qPCR. At 9 of 10 distal fetal GATA4 regions examined, including prospective enhancers of Ppargc1a, Prkag2, Ryr2, Tnnt1, Hey2, and Ednra, GATA4 inactivation significantly reduced H3K27ac enrichment (Fig. 3h). On the other hand, GATA4 gain-of-function in HL1 cardiomyocyte-like cells significantly increased H3K27ac enrichment at 8 of these regions (Fig. 3h).

Together, these data show that GATA4 plays a permissive role in gene regulation, but its binding strength as assessed by ChIP-seq does not correlate with the level of gene transcription. Rather, GATA4 stimulates deposition of H3K27ac, which then drives cardiac gene expression.

Dynamic changes in GATA4 binding during development

To determine changes in GATA4 chromatin occupancy that occur during normal development, we performed GATA4 bioChIP-seq on adult heart ventricles. In biological duplicate samples, we identified greater than 15,000 binding sites, with 13504 (83.4%) overlapping between replicates. Previously reported GATA4 antibody ChIP-seq from whole adult heart identified less than one seventh the number of GATA4 regions (1756)17, although 69.6% of these overlapped with our bioChIP-seq peaks. By contrast, GATA4 antibody ChIP-seq identified 4409 GATA4 regions in adult fetal liver,18 and only 22.8% of these regions overlapped our heart ventricle bioChIP-seq peaks. These data suggest that most GATA4 chromatin occupancy is tissue specific.

We compared the peaks shared by biological duplicate bioChIP-seq samples from fetal heart to those from adult (Fig. 4a–b; Supplementary Fig. 3a; Supplementary Data 1). Of the 13504 adult GATA4 regions, 8716 (66.5%) "Shared" regions were reproducibly also occupied by GATA4 in fetal heart. On the other hand, 4339/13504 (33.5%) adult GATA4 regions were not bound by GATA4 in fetal heart ("Adult-Specific"), and 35084/43800 (80.1%) fetal GATA4 regions were not bound by GATA4 in adult heart ("Fetal-Specific"). While reduced GATA4 expression in the adult heart (Supplementary Fig. 3b) may contribute to the lower number of adult GATA4 regions, this does not account for the "Adult-Specific" GATA4 regions bound in adult and not fetal heart.

Figure 4. Dynamic GATA4 occupancy from fetal to adult heart controls distinct gene programs.

(a) Overlap of GATA4 regions between fetal and adult heart. (b) Tag heatmap showing the GATA4 signal intensity at Fetal-specific, Adult-specific, and Shared regions (4 kb wide, centered on the GATA4 peak). (c) The genomic distribution of GATA4 regions in fetal and adult heart. (d) GO term analysis showed that heart-related terms (orange bars) were only enriched in the Fetal-Specific distal and Shared distal regions. (e) TF motifs over-represented in GATA4-bound regions. The top 1000 GATA4 regions in the indicated region classes were used for de novo motif discovery. The heatmap displays statistically over-represented motifs that mapped to JASPAR and TRANSFAC motifs. (f) Down-regulation of cardiac TFs MEF2A and TEAD1 during heart development. Arrowhead indicates the full-length protein. Asterisk indicates a smaller immunoreactive band. (g) Box plot of the relationship of GATA4 binding strength to gene expression in fetal and adult stages. GATA4 peaks were ranked by enrichment score and divided into quartiles (1st quartile = lowest binding strength). Plot shows expression of genes associated with peaks in each quartile. GATA4 bound genes were more highly expressed than unbound genes, but among bound genes there was no correlation between binding strength and gene expression level. Mann-Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. ****, P<0.0001 compared to each other group.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Adult and fetal GATA4 regions differed considerably in their location. 83.7% of fetal GATA4 regions were distal to TSSs (defined as beyond −2 to +2 kb of the TSS), consistent with our prior findings in the HL1 cardiomyocyte-like cell line8. However, adult GATA4 regions shifted markedly towards proximal binding, as only 46.6% were distally located. Similarly, 93.3%, 44.9%, and 50% of Fetal-Specific, Shared, and Adult-Specific GATA4 regions were distally located, respectively (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 3c).

Fetal-Specific, Shared, and Adult-Specific GATA4 regions were associated with different functional terms (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 3d–e). Distal GATA4 sites that were Fetal-Specific or Shared were associated with GO terms pertaining to heart development (orange bars, Fig. 4d). Distal Fetal-Specific GATA4 regions were also linked to “positive regulation of cell cycle process” and “regulation of TGFβ receptor signaling pathway”, consistent with GATA4 regulation of cardiomyocyte proliferation4,19 and its interaction with Smad proteins, nuclear targets of TGFβ signaling20.

Cardiac TFs collaboratively bind to chromatin loci8, and changes in GATA4 binding partners might account for altered chromatin occupancy during development21,22. To identify potential partners, we performed de novo motif discovery on GATA4-bound regions (Fig. 4e). As expected, the GATA motif was highly over-represented in GATA4-bound regions from fetal and adult heart, with adult-specific proximal regions (2171 regions) being the sole exception. The co-enriched motifs of other TFs were mostly distinct between fetal-specific and adult-specific GATA4-bound regions. For example, the MEF2 motif was strongly enriched in Fetal-Specific and Shared GATA4-bound regions, and the TEAD1 motif was enriched amongst Fetal-Specific peaks. Shared distal peaks were highly enriched for E-box motifs, which are often bound by bHLH proteins such as HAND1/223. Adult GATA4 regions were highly enriched for the EGR motif, particularly amongst proximal GATA4 regions. Scanning these regions for the consensus binding motifs for GATA4, MEF2, TEAD1, and EGR1 reinforced these conclusions (Supplementary Fig. 3f). These changes in associated motifs might reflect altered expression of transcriptional regulators between fetal and adult heart. For instance, the expression of MEF2A and TEAD1 was significantly lower in adult compared to fetal heart (Fig. 4f).

We asked if the extent of GATA4 occupancy is related to target gene expression level. GATA4-bound genes were more highly expressed than genes lacking GATA4 binding in both fetal and adult heart (Fig. 4g). However, the strength of GATA4 binding did not correlate with gene expression level in either fetal or adult heart. These data are consistent with our analysis of the interplay between GATA4 binding, H3K27ac enrichment, and gene expression in the fetal heart, and suggest that this analysis likely also pertains to the adult heart.

The chromatin landscape of GATA4-bound regions

To further investigate the relationship of GATA4 chromatin occupancy to features of the chromatin landscape, we used ChIP-Seq to establish genome-wide maps of key epigenetic marks (H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K27me3, and H3K4me3) and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) in fetal and adult heart ventricles (Supplementary Data 1). The pattern of these chromatin landscape features at TSSs and at active enhancers (defined by H3K27ac enrichment distal to TSSs; Supplementary Fig. 4a) was consistent with previous reports15,24–26, supporting the fidelity of these data.

We analyzed the aggregate signal for each of these marks centered around fetal and adult GATA4 peaks, each subdivided into locations proximal or distal to TSSs (Fig. 5a and replicate Supplementary Fig. 4b). GATA4 peaks were depleted for H3K27me3, a repressive mark. Shared distal and proximal GATA4 regions were enriched for H3K27ac (Fig. 5a v-viii), an activating mark found at enhancers and also present near the TSS15. These regions were also enriched for H3K4me3 and RNAPII, activating marks most highly enriched at TSSs27 and also found at enhancers28,29. H3K4me1, a mark found at enhancers and to a lesser extent at promoters30, also was enriched in the Shared GATA4 regions, with the exception of Shared proximal regions of the adult heart. Thus, Shared GATA4-bound regions featured chromatin landscapes rich in activating marks, in both fetal and adult heart.

Figure 5. The chromatin landscape of GATA4 regions influences their reliance on GATA4 for H3K27ac accumulation.

(a) The chromatin landscape at GATA4 proximal and distal regions in the fetal and adult heart. Aggregate curves of ChIP-seq enrichment are plotted centered on GATA4. Arrows in panel i point out the lack of enrichment of H3K4me3 and RNAPII, which are found at other enhancers. (b) ChIP-seq tag heatmaps are shown for the chromatin landscape feature indicated. The regions are distal Fetal-Specific or Adult-Specific GATA4 regions. The regions were groups into those with (type I) and without (type II) H3K4me3 and RNAP2 enrichment. Each region is 2 kb around the peak center. (c) GO term analysis of genes associated with distal GATA4 regions co-occupied by type I or type II chromatin signatures in fetal heart. Orange bars highlight GO terms related to heart. (d) Change in H3K27ac enrichment of type I vs type II regions with GATA4 loss of function. H3K27ac enrichment in Gata4fl/fl::cTNT-Cre or Gata4fl/fl control E12.5 heart at distal GATA4 regions is displayed as heat maps. The regions are ordered by the KO/WT H3K27ac ratio. The number of peaks in each condition is indicated below the heat maps. (e) Plot of the fraction of H3K27ac peaks retained in GATA4 knockout. H3K27ac at type II peaks was more sensitive to GATA4 loss-of-function. (f) Box plot comparing H3K27ac enrichment in GATA4 knockout or control at distal GATA4 regions with different chromatin environments. d,g Mann-Whitney test. f, Fisher exact test. . ***, P<0.001; ****, P<0.0001.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

We next considered distal, stage-specific GATA4 binding sites (Fig. 5a, boxes i and x). These were also enriched for H3K27ac, suggesting that many of these regions are functional enhancers. Distal Adult-Specific GATA4 regions had H3K27ac enrichment in adult but not fetal heart (Fig. 5a, box×vs ix), suggesting that many of these regions are adult-specific functional enhancers. Consistent with this conclusion, there was also significant H3K4me3 and RNAPII enrichment at the large majority of these sites in adult but not fetal heart. However, a different pattern was observed at distal Fetal-Specific GATA4 regions – these showed H3K27ac enrichment that was relatively weaker than seen at the Adult-Specific GATA4 regions, and that was not substantially different between fetal and adult stages (Fig. 5a, box i vs ii). Furthermore, these fetal distal peaks lacked H3K4me3 and RNAPII (arrows, Fig. 5a box i).

To further investigate the chromatin landscape at GATA4-occupied distal enhancers, we analyzed tag heat maps of GATA4+ H3K27ac+ distal regions (Fig. 5b and replicate Supplementary Fig. 4c). 79.6% of distal Adult-Specific GATA4 regions displayed a typical enhancer signature (H3K27ac+, H3K4me3+, RNAPII+) in the adult heart, which we refer to as type I distal GATA4 regions, whereas 96.4% of distal Fetal-Specific GATA4 regions displayed the less typical enhancer signature (H3K27ac+, H3K4me3−, RNAPII−) in the fetal heart, which we designated type II distal GATA4 regions. Shared GATA4 regions also exhibited predominantly (80.1%) the type II chromatin signature in fetal heart. Interestingly, during development 775 (41.7%) type II regions acquire H3K4me3 and RNAPII to become type I regions, whereas only 1 (<0.1%) type I regions lost H3K4me3 and RNAPII to become type II (Supplementary Fig. 4d). As a result, Shared GATA4 regions have predominantly (74%) a type I chromatin signature in the adult heart. Together, these data indicate that distal fetal GATA4 regions have a significantly different chromatin signature than adult GATA4 regions (Fisher exact P<0.0001).

We examined the biological significance of the type II GATA4 region chromatin signature. To determine if these regions have in vivo heart enhancer activity, we reviewed available in vivo heart enhancer test data. In our enhancer testing and in the VISTA enhancer database31, there were 97 GATA4+ H3K27ac+ regions with a type II fetal heart chromatin signature. 66 (68%) had heart activity. Only 6 regions with a type I fetal heart chromatin signature were tested in the in vivo enhancer assay, and 4 (66%) were positive. Both type I and type II fetal GATA4 regions were over-represented for Gene Ontology (GO) terms related to heart development (Fig. 5c; orange bars). Type II regions were also related to TGF-beta signaling and cell cycle regulation, processes known to be under GATA4 regulation20,32. These results indicate that a subset of GATA4+ H3K27ac+ regions with type I or II signatures are bona fide heart enhancers.

We next asked whether enrichment of H3K27ac at fetal distal type I or type II peaks differed in their dependence on GATA4. We analyzed our data on H3K27ac occupancy in G4CKO versus control E12.5 heart ventricle, comparing the change of H3K27ac observed at type I and type II distal Fetal-Specific and Shared GATA4 regions (Fig. 5d–f). In control hearts, overall H3K27ac signal was significantly lower at type II compared to type I regions (Fig. 5f), and GATA4 inactivation reduced H3K27ac enrichment so that only 23% of type II regions were identified as H3K27ac peaks in mutant hearts (Fig. 5d,e). In comparison, 49.3% of type I peaks continued to be identified as H3K27ac peaks in mutants (Fisher P=1.47E-18). The same was true of Shared distal regions, where only 31% of type II regions retained H3K27ac in GATA4 knockout, compared to 89.1% of type I regions (P=8.21E-36). These results indicate that the chromatin landscape of regulatory regions influences their dependence on GATA4 for establishment or maintenance of H3K27ac.

Reactivated and new enhancers in adult pressure overload

GATA4 plays an integral role in pathological cardiac hypertrophy, in which stress such as pressure overload induces abnormal cardiomyocyte growth and gene expression1,5. Reactivation of a “fetal transcriptional program”, in which genes normally downregulated between fetal and adult heart are re-expressed in pressure overload, has been described as an integral component of cardiac hypertrophy. While individual examples of fetal gene reactivation are well described, the extent to which the transcriptional circuitry of the fetal heart is redeployed in pathological hypertrophy is unknown.

We used RNA-seq to compare cardiac gene expression in mice with pressure overload induced by a surgically placed ligature around the aorta (“Band”) to mice that had undergone sham operation (“Sham”). Out of 1016 hypertrophic genes (Supplementary Data 3), defined as genes upregulated by more than 0.5-fold (log2 scale = 1.41-fold linear scale) in Band, 383 (37.7%) were associated with distal Fetal-Specific GATA4 regions (Fig. 6a). In comparison, only 86 (8.5%), 125 (12.3%), and 204 (20.1%) regions with distal Adult-Specific, Shared, and no GATA4 binding were associated with hypertrophic genes, respectively. GO term analysis of the overlapped genes yielded cardiac-related terms in the distal Fetal-Specific and Shared groups (orange bars, Fig. 6a). In contrast, GO term analysis of hypertrophic genes with Adult-Specific or no GATA4 binding did not yield functional terms related to the heart.

Figure 6. GATA4 chromatin occupancy and gene expression changes in pressure overload.

(a) Genes upregulated in banding (”hypertrophic genes”) showed the greatest overlap with genes associated to distal fetal GATA4 peaks. Peaks were mapped to genes (see Methods) and genes were filtered for detectable expression (FPKM>=1). “Not bound” indicates genes without distal GATA4 binding in fetal or adult heart. p-value indicates significance of overlap, using the hypergeometric test. (b) GATA4 bioChIP-seq of Band and Sham heart showing the extent of peak overlap. Peaks include proximal and distal regions. Peaks unique to Band were defined as Band-induced GATA4 regions. (c) GATA4+ Band-Induced genes, defined as genes associated with distal GATA4 peaks found in Band but not Sham, overlapped with genes associated with distal fetal GATA4 regions. There was less overlap with genes associated with distal adult GATA4 regions. p-value indicates significance of overlap, using the hypergeometric test. (d) Hypertrophic genes overlapped significantly with genes that shared both Fetal-Specific and Band-Induced GATA4 regions. These overlapped genes were enriched for heart GO terms (indicated by the orange colored bar). There was less overlap with genes that shared both Fetal-Specific and Sham-Specific GATA4 regions, and the genes in this overlap were not enriched for heart GO terms. (e) Example of bioChIP-seq and RNA-seq (reads/10 M unique mapped reads) data tracks. Ankrd1 was downregulated in fetal heart GATA4 knockout and upregulated in band. Ankrd1 was strongly bound by GATA4 at both proximal and distal locations in fetal heart (grey boxes). GATA4 occupancy was lower in sham and increased in band.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Next, we examined GATA4 binding changes induced by pressure overload. GATA4 bioChIP-seq identified 1847 and 3772 distal GATA4-occupied regions in Sham and Band heart, respectively. Only 908 GATA4 regions (49%) were shared between Sham and Band (Fig. 6b), suggesting that GATA4 occupancy significantly changes in heart disease. Distal GATA4 regions identified in Band only (“Band-Induced”) mapped to 1783 genes, which we referred to as GATA4+ Band-Induced genes. Most GATA4+ Band-Induced genes extensively overlapped (86.2%; P < 1.00E-200) with genes associated with distal Fetal-Specific GATA4 regions (Fig. 6c), while the extent of overlap with genes associated with distal Adult-Specific GATA4 regions was far less (14%; P < 1.8E-6).

The genes related to distal GATA4 regions that were found in both Band-Induced and Fetal-Specific peak sets showed significant overlap with hypertrophy genes (Fig. 6d; 22.1%; p = 1.38E-23). These overlapped genes were enriched for heart-related GO terms (orange bar, Fig. 6d). In contrast, the genes associated with Sham-Specific and Fetal-Specific distal GATA4 regions overlapped less extensively with hypertrophy genes (4.5%; p = 8.32E-05) and these overlapped genes were not enriched for heart-related GO terms.

To further investigate how disease- and development-associated changes in GATA4 occupancy relate to one another, we compared GATA4 bioChIP-seq signals from fetal, sham and band samples. Figure 6e shows an illustrative example in which two regions, highly enriched for GATA4 in the fetal heart, are adjacent to Ankrd1, a gene upregulated in Band. In Sham-operated adult heart, the bioChIP-seq signal was sub-threshold, but returned with banding (Fig. 6e).

Displaying all distal regions with GATA4 enrichment in band but not sham (Band-Induced regions), categorized by their overlap with Fetal-Specific, Adult-Specific, and Shared regions, yielded an overview of the relationship of GATA4 chromatin occupancy in development and disease (Fig. 7a; Supplementary Data 4; Supplementary Fig. 5a–b). This analysis defined a class of Band-Induced regions with little GATA4 occupancy in normal fetal or adult heart (“New”, Fig. 7a), and three additional classes that overlapped with Fetal-Specific, Adult-Specific, and Shared regions. This “New” category contained the most regions, indicating that cardiac stress induced GATA4 to occupy regions that it does not bind in normal heart development. Among the genes associated with these regions were hypertrophy regulators Tead1, Fhl1, Ankrd1, and SWI/SNF core component Smarca2 (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Additional Band-Induced GATA4 peaks represented restored GATA4 binding to Fetal-Specific peaks at genes such as Zfpm2 (Fog2) and Hdac9 (Supplementary Fig. 5b).

Figure 7. The cardiac hypertrophic transcriptional program reflects re-establishment of fetal GATA4 binding and acquisition of new GATA4 binding sites.

(a) Tag heatmap of distal regions containing Band-Induced GATA4 regions. These regions were classified by their overlap with Fetal-Specific, Adult-Specific, or Fetal-Adult Shared peaks. Those without overlap were labeled “New”. Within each group, regions were sorted by the enrichment score in Band. (b) Relationship of Band-Induced distal GATA4 regions with DNaseI Hypersensitive sites (DHS) of normal adult heart to GATA4 binding. DHS data was obtained by ENCODE.33 Blue and pink indicates regions with and without significant DHS signal, respectively. P-value indicates the significance of the difference in overlap of Fetal-Specific or New regions compared to Adult-Specific or Shared regions (Fisher exact test). (c) Over-represented motifs found by de novo motif discovery in distal GATA4 Band-induced regions, based on their overlap with developmental GATA4 regions. (d) Motif scanning with the indicated motifs showed their frequency in Fetal-Specific, Adult-Specific, Shared and New classes of distal, Band-induced GATA4 regions. (e) Co-occurrence of GATA and NFAT motifs in the same peak region, among distal, Band-induced GATA4 regions that overlapped with Fetal-Specific and New peaks. (f) Distribution of distance of GATA4 and NFAT motifs in the GATA4 peaks in panel (e). (g) Luciferase assay of selected enhancers in 293T cells under basal conditions or in the presence of GATA4 or GATA4+p300 overexpression. (h) Luciferase assay of selected enhancers in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs). NRVMs were transfected with indicated enhancer-luciferase constructs and stimulated with or without PE for 30 hrs. Relative luciferase activity was expressed as fold change against the unstimulated empty vector. Number over bars indicates fold-stimulation by PE. b, Fisher exact test. g and h, t-test. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. Error bars, s.e.m.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Most transcriptional regulatory sequences exhibit hypersensitivity to digestion by DNase I.33 To further assess whether these distal GATA4-bound regions likely represent regulatory sequences, we evaluated their DNase I hypersensitivity using publicly data for the normal adult mouse heart33 (Fig. 7b). The large majority (75.4%) of the Band-Induced GATA4 Regions overlapped with DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs). Thus, most distal Band-Induced GATA4-regions had an open chromatin conformation consistent with active transcriptional regulatory regions, and most of these regions already possessed this open signature in the normal adult heart. Interestingly, amongst the Band-Induced GATA4 regions that were "New" or reactivated Fetal-Specific, regions without DHS signal in the normal adult heart were significantly more frequent than in the other two groups (Fig. 7b; 42.9% (P =1.2E-38) and 10.3% (P=1.90E-12) in New and Fetal-specific categories, respectively). These may represent disease transcriptional enhancers recruited as part of the cardiac hypertrophy transcriptional program.

We also analyzed GATA4 occupancy of proximal Band-Induced regions to determine the relationship to GATA4 occupancy in normal fetal and adult heart (Supplementary Fig. 5c–d). This genome-wide analysis only yielded 42 (7.6%) and 58 (10.5%) "Fetal-Specific" and "New" regions, respectively. These sets of regions did not yield any significant GO terms nor were they enriched in known TF motifs. These results indicate that pressure overload does not lead to substantial shift of GATA4 binding to Fetal-Specific or New proximal regions and that changes in distal rather than proximal GATA4 binding likely play a dominant role in regulation of the hypertrophic response.

To identify partner TFs that might drive GATA4 occupancy of distal regions in pressure overload, we performed de novo motif discovery using the four classes of distal, Band-Induced GATA4 regions (Fig. 7c). The distal Band-induced peaks that overlapped with GATA4 regions in fetal and/or adult heart were enriched for the consensus GATA motif, while the “New” group of distal Band-induced peaks contained an atypical GATA motif. Interestingly, Band-Induced GATA regions overlapping fetal GATA4 regions, and “New” GATA4 regions, were also enriched for the motif of NFAT (Fig. 7c), a calcium-responsive TF family essential for heart development34 and the heart's response to pathological stimuli such as pressure overload35. Scanning the Band-Induced peaks for the consensus GATA and NFAT motifs showed that most regions with banding-induced restoration of fetal GATA4 occupancy contained both GATA and NFAT motifs (Fig. 7d). Indeed, 85% of the regions with the GATA motif also contained an NFAT motif (Fig. 7e), and the motifs were usually located less than 60 bp from each other (Fig. 7f). Among the genes relevant to pressure-overload hypertrophy that contained GATA4 bound regions with NFAT motifs were Ryr2, Myocd, Vegfa, Camk2d, and the mineraldocorticoid nuclear receptor Nr3c2 (Supplementary Data 4). These data corroborate prior anecdotal data indicative of an important role for NFAT-GATA4 interaction in the cardiac hypertrophic response, and moreover identify candidate enhancers regulated by this interaction.

We analyzed the functional annotations of genes associated with the Band-Induced GATA4 regions (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Distal Band-Induced GATA4 regions overlapping Shared GATA4 regions were enriched for functional terms related to muscle development and heart contraction, as well as mitochondrial organization. Distal Band-Induced GATA4 regions overlapping Fetal-Specific peaks were associated with muscle and artery development, and the subset of these regions that contained both NFAT and GATA motifs was likewise associated with functional terms related to muscle differentiation and cytoskeleton organization (P < 2E-05).

To further assess the transcriptional regulatory activity of distal Band-Induced GATA4 regions, we selected 10 regions linked to genes upregulated in pressure overload. The regions were cloned into luciferase reporter vectors containing basal promoters. Their responsiveness to GATA4 was tested by co-transfection with GATA4 or GATA4 plus p300. GATA4 alone significantly increased transcriptional enhancer activity in 9 of the 10 regions, and introduction of p300 further boosted their activity (Fig. 7g). Next, we tested the responsiveness of these regulatory elements to activation of the hypertrophic program in cardiomyocytes. The enhancer-reporter constructs were transfected into neonatal rat ventricular myocytes treated with the hypertrophic agonist phenylephrine (PE) or vehicle control. PE significantly increased the activity of 4 out of 10 enhancers (1.3–22.9 fold stimulation; Fig. 7h), whereas six enhancers were not detectably stimulated by PE. Testing these adult enhancers in neonatal cardiomyocytes possibly reduced the sensitivity of this assay.

Together, these data show that pressure overload activates a hypertrophic program involving GATA4 recruitment to new disease enhancers that were not occupied by GATA4 during development, as well as restoration of GATA4 binding to a subset of fetal GATA4 enhancers.

DISCUSSION

The dynamic changes in transcription factor chromatin occupancy that occur during development and disease, its relationship to the chromatin environment, and its effect on transcriptional regulation, are important incompletely resolved questions. Here, we investigated in depth the chromatin occupancy of the key cardiac transcription factor GATA4 and show that its chromatin occupancy changes dynamically in heart development and disease.

We used two independent GATA4 pull-down strategies, streptavidin pull-down of in vivo biotinylated GATA4 and immunoprecipitation, to identify GATA4-bound regions. Establishing a knockin, epitope tagged mouse line is time consuming and resource intensive. The investment in generating the in vivo biotinylated allele proved fruitful, as bioChIP-seq was highly efficient and reproducible and yielded more peaks with higher signal than obtained through antibody-mediated ChIP-seq. Antibody-mediated ChIP-seq remained valuable as an orthogonal method that helped us further hone in on high confidence GATA4-bound regions, but was more variable and far less sensitive.

GATA4 chromatin occupancy changed dramatically through development, in concert with its changing function. GATA4 regions in the fetal heart were predominantly distal from TSSs. In adult heart, we observed a dramatic shift of GATA4 regions to TSS proximal locations. Motif analysis indicated that the selection of GATA4 binding sites is influenced by its interactions with TFs: MEF2, TEAD1, and E-box motifs were over-represented in fetal GATA4 regions, while motifs of EGR1, a TF implicated in regulation of cardiac hypertrophy36, were over-represented in adult GATA4 regions.

An important mechanism for GATA4 transcriptional activity was promoting deposition of activating histone marks near its binding sites. Through multiple lines of data, we showed that GATA4 recruits the histone acetyltransferase p300, which deposits H3K27ac deposition at cardiac enhancers to stimulate transcription. These findings provide insights into how transcription factors such as GATA4 shape the chromatin environment to regulate gene expression.

The chromatin landscape of distal GATA4+ H3K27ac+ prospective enhancers was different between fetal and adult heart. In adult heart, most of these regions were enriched for RNAPII and H3K4me3, which are commonly found at enhancers24,29. In contrast, these regions largely lacked RNAPII and H3K4me3 enrichment in fetal heart. Regions lacking RNAPII and H3K4me3 had a greater reliance on GATA4 for their H3K27ac enrichment. One interpretation of these observations is that initially established enhancers lack RNAPII and H3K4me3 enrichment, and in this nascent state require GATA4 to maintain H3K27ac. With time, the enhancers become more well established , accumulate RNAPII and H3K4me3, and reduce their dependence upton GATA4 for maintenance of H3K27ac. Additional studies will be required to test these hypotheses and to determine whether these observations are restricted to GATA4 enhancers or are generalizeable to other enhancer classes.

Pathological stress, such as pressure overload, alters cardiac gene expression and promotes the re-expression of genes predominantly expressed in the fetal heart. This observation has been attributed to reactivation of a fetal gene program, which implies restoration of TF binding to fetal enhancers. We rigorously tested this model by comparing GATA4 chromatin occupancy in development versus pressure overload. At the gene level, there was a clear relationship between hypertrophic genes and distal fetal GATA4 occupancy patterns. Furthermore, a subset of distal Band-Induced GATA4 regions did indeed reflect restoration of fetal GATA4 binding. However, reactivation of fetal regulatory regions constitutes a small portion of the transcriptional response of the diseased adult heart. Whereas 20.5% of Band-Induced GATA4 regions represented re-occupancy of fetal regions, 40.5% were due to GATA4 binding to transcriptional regulatory elements not normally bound by GATA4 in the normal developing or adult heart. These “New” GATA4-bound regions suggest a stress-induced, disease specific transcriptional program.

Two mechanisms likely contribute to GATA4 recruitment to new distal elements in cardiac hypertrophy. First, the majority of distal elements that overlapped restored fetal binding contained both GATA4 and NFAT motifs. This interaction was previously reported for Nppb and its general significance was inferred from this anecdotal example.35 Our observation provides unbiased, genome-wide evidence for the importance of GATA4-NFAT co-binding in driving the hypertrophic response and the reactivation of fetal gene expression, and identifies many other enhancers and genes that are likely regulated through this mechanism.

Second, we found that 43% of Banding-Induced GATA4 occupancy of "New" distal sites occurred at sites that have a "closed" chromatin configuration in the normal heart, as assessed by lack of DNaseI hypersensitivity. GATA4 has been shown to displace histones from chromatinized DNA. This "pioneer" activity has been proposed to permit GATA4 to initiate formation of transcriptional regulatory complexes on closed chromatin.37 We propose that GATA4 occupies "New" loci in pressure overload through its pioneer activity. The characteristics that define these "New" loci and their functional significance will be fruitful areas for future study.

Methods

Mice

Gata4flbio (Jackson Labs, stock #018121)11, Rosa26BirA (Jackson Labs, stock #010920)38, cTNTcre39, and Gata4flox (Jackson Labs, stock #008194)6 alleles were described previously. Experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Fetal mice were collected at E12.5. Hearts were collected from adult mice at 6–10 weeks of age. The apical half of the heart of fetal and adult hearts was used for chromatin or RNA analysis. Sham and Band (ascending aortic band) were performed as described40. Hearts were collected 2 weeks after the operation.

ChIP and RNA preparation

Ventricular apex tissue was used for chromatin and RNA preparation. Both bioChIP and antibody-based ChIP were performed as described9. For bioChIP, minced freshly collected tissues were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature then terminated with glycine. After PBS rinse, nuclei were isolated by resuspending in Hypotonic Lysis Buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 0.1 mM 0.2% (vol/vol) Nonidet P40 (NP-40), 10% (vol/vol) glycerol plus protease inhibitor cocktail) and dounce homogenized. Pelleted nuclei were then resuspended in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100 (TX100), and protease inhibitors. Samples were sonicated, yielding an average fragment size of ~200 bp. After preclearing with Protein G beads, samples were incubated with streptavidin beads (Dynabeads Streptavidin M280) at 4°C overnight. Beads were washed with a series of buffers containing 2% SDS, 0.1% deoxycholate, 1% TX100, and high and low salt concentrations. After DNA elution, cross-link reversal, and Proteinase K digestion, and purification with Qiaquick columns (Qiagen), Illumina sequencing libraries were constructed. Antibody-based ChIP was performed as above but without the 2% SDS wash step.

ChIP-qPCR values were expressed as fold-enrichment. Antibodies used were: GATA4, Santa Cruz sc-1237x; H3K4me3, Active Motif 39159; H3K4me1, Abcam ab8895; H3K27ac, Abcam ab4729; H3K27me3, Millipore 17-622; RNAPII, Millipore 17-672.

RNA-seq libraries were prepared as described41. Briefly, mRNA was isolated from total RNA using Dynabeads Oligo(dT), followed by first and second strands synthesis. RNA-seq libraries were prepared from fragmented double stranded cDNA using ScriptSeq v2 (Epicenter).

Transgenic mouse reporter assay

Genomic regions covering selected GATA4 regions were amplified and inserted upstream of a minimal hsp68 promoter-LacZ reporter gene as described previously13. Transgenic mouse embryos were generated by pronuclear injection. Embryos were collected at E11.5 and stained for LacZ activity as previously described13. A region was scored as yielding positive heart activity if three or more transient transgenics from the same construct yielded a reproducible cardiac staining pattern.

Luciferase reporter assay

Genomic regions were amplified and cloned upstream of a minimal promoter in XhoI and HindIII digested pGL4.23 using the Gibson assembly method. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM) at postnatal day 1 were isolated and co-transfected with pGL4.23-enhancers and phRL-TK with X-tremeGENE HP transfection reagent (Roche), stimulated with or without 100 μM phenlephrine (PE) for 30 hrs before the the dual-luciferase assay. Luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and expressed as fold change against the empty vector pGL4.23.

Chip-seq data analysis

Illumina libraries were sequenced on a Hiseq 2000. Single end 50 nt reads were aligned to mouse reference genome (mm9) using BWA (version 0.5.9)42. Reads with no more than 2 bp mismatches and uniquely mapped to reference genome were retained. For duplicated reads with exactly the same genomic coordinates, only one read was kept. Read density was expressed as the number of reads per 10 million uniquely mapped, non-duplicated reads.

The peak caller program MACS (version 1.4)43 was used to identify peaks with the following parameter settings: --bw=200 --keep-dup=1. We used IGV (version 2.3)44 or the UCSC Genome Browser to visualize bigwig data tracks. For each track, read number was normalized per 10 million aligned reads. Peaks were assigned to the gene with the closest TSS. Proximal was defined within ±2 kb of the TSS, while remaining regions were defined as distal.

Aggregation plots were generated using Homer (version 3.1)45. 40 kb centered on each peak with 100 bp bin size was used for P300 ChIP-seq datasets, while 4 kb peak region and 10 bp bin size was used for all the other datasets. For heatmaps, tag density matrices were calculated using Homer. 4kb centered on each peak with 50 bp bin size was used for Figure 5B, while 2kb centered on each peak with 25 bp bin size was used for Figure 7A. Values plottered were log2 transformed fold-enrichment (ChIP signal divided by input signal).

Genome regions were associated to the gene with the nearest TSS.

RNA-seq analysis

Paired-end, 50 nt RNA-Seq reads were mapped to mouse reference genome (mm9) using TopHat (version 1.4.0)46 with default parameter settings. The mapped reads of each gene were counted by htseq-count (version 0.5.4)47 with the following parameter setting: -i gene_name -a 20 -s no. Expression levels for each gene were calculated by Fragments Per Kilobase of Transcript (longest transcript of gene) per Million mapped fragments (FPKM). Gene expression value was log2 transformed (FPKM+1) for further analysis. An expressed gene was defined as a gene with FPKM>0 in at least one condition. Differentially expressed genes were identified by a log2 fold-change of at least 0.5

Motif analysis

De novo motif detection was analyzed using DREME48 with the following parameters: -e 0.00001 -mink 5 -maxk 15. We mapped de novo motifs to a known motif database using TOM TOM49 with default settings. The Motif database was constructed from MEME suite50. Only vertebrate motifs were retained. De novo motifs that did not match known motifs were not used. Motifs with p-value<10−8 identified by DREME and p-value<10−3 identified by TOM TOM were collected for generating the motif heatmap. Motif occurrence within peaks was calculated with FIMO51 with default parameters for fetal, adult and shared Gata4 peaks, and q-value<0.5 for band Gata4 peaks.

GO analysis

The functional enrichment of peak regions for Gene Ontology (GO) terms was performed using GREAT52 with default parameters. The top 20 terms in the “biological process” section were used. Lists of genes were analyzed for GO term enrichment using DAVID53. Terms within the top 20 "GOTERM_BP_FAT" category were used.

Quantitative PCR and Western Blotting

Real time PCR was used to measure relative ChIP enrichment or gene expression. Quantitative PCR was performed using Sybr green chemistry (VeriQuest master mix; Affymetrix). Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Data 5. Western blotting was performed using standard protocols. Full uncropped blots are provided in Supplementary Figures 6 and 7.

Statistical analysis

For bar charts, data is presented as mean ± SEM. For whisker plots, the center line indicates the median, the box represents the interquartile range, and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values. Hypergeometric test was used to assess the significance of overlaps in Venn diagrams. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare box plots. Statistical significance was indicated with: * for p<0.05, ** for p<0.01, ***for p<0.001, **** for p<0.0001.

Supplementary Material

1

ACKNOWLEGEMENTS

WTP was supported by funding from the Cardiovascular Development Consortium (U01HL098166) and HL095712, by an Established Investigator Award from the American Heart Association, and by charitable donations from Karen Carpenter, Edward Marram, and Gail Federici Smith. A.H. was supported by the Scientist Development Grant from American Heart Association (13SDG14320001). L.A.P. and A.V. were supported by grants HG003988 and U54HG006997 funded by National Human Genome Research Institute. The transient transgenic assays were conducted at the E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and performed under Department of Energy Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231, University of California.

Footnotes

CONTRIBUTIONS: AH and FG contributed equally to this manuscript. AH designed and performed experiments and analyzed dadta. FG analyzed data. YH designed and performed experiments. QM, LYY, and JAA performed experiments. AV, LAP, and WTP directed experiments and analyzed data. AH, FG, and WTP wrote the manuscript.

COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

ACCESSION CODES: The high throughput data used in this study are available through the Cardiovascular Development Consortium Server at https://b2b.hci.utah.edu/gnomex/ . The data have also been deposited at GEO, accession number GSE52123.

References

  • 1.Oka T, Xu J, Molkentin JD. Re-employment of developmental transcription factors in adult heart disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:117–131. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuo CT, Morrisey EE, Anandappa R, Sigrist K, et al. GATA4 transcription factor is required for ventral morphogenesis and heart tube formation. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1048–1060. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.8.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Molkentin JD, Lin Q, Duncan SA, Olson EN. Requirement of the transcription factor GATA4 for heart tube formation and ventral morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1061–1072. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.8.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zeisberg EM, Ma Q, Juraszek AL, Moses K, et al. Morphogenesis of the right ventricle requires myocardial expression of Gata4. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1522–1531. doi: 10.1172/JCI23769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bisping E, Ikeda S, Kong SW, Tarnavski O, et al. Gata4 is required for maintenance of postnatal cardiac function and protection from pressure overload-induced heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14471–14476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602543103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oka T, Maillet M, Watt AJ, Schwartz RJ, et al. Cardiac-specific deletion of Gata4 reveals its requirement for hypertrophy, compensation, and myocyte viability. Circ Res. 2006;98:837–845. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000215985.18538.c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heineke J, Auger-Messier M, Xu J, Oka T, et al. Cardiomyocyte GATA4 functions as a stress-responsive regulator of angiogenesis in the murine heart. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3198–3210. doi: 10.1172/JCI32573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.He A, Kong SW, Ma Q, Pu WT. Co-occupancy by multiple cardiac transcription factors identifies transcriptional enhancers active in heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:5632–5637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016959108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.He A, Pu WT. Genome-wide location analysis by pull down of in vivo biotinylated transcription factors. Chapter 21, Unit 21.20. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010 doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2120s92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Boer E, Rodriguez P, Bonte E, Krijgsveld J, et al. Efficient biotinylation and single-step purification of tagged transcription factors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7480–7485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1332608100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.He A, Shen X, Ma Q, Cao J, et al. PRC2 directly methylates GATA4 and represses its transcriptional activity. Genes Dev. 2012;26:37–42. doi: 10.1101/gad.173930.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dai YS, Markham BE. p300 Functions as a coactivator of transcription factor gata-4. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:37178–37185. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103731200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Blow MJ, McCulley DJ, Li Z, Zhang T, et al. ChIP-Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers. Nat Genet. 2010;42:806–810. doi: 10.1038/ng.650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Visel A, Blow MJ, Li Z, Zhang T, et al. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature. 2009;457:854–858. doi: 10.1038/nature07730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG, Kooistra T, et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:21931–21936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016071107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rada-Iglesias A, Bajpai R, Swigut T, Brugmann SA, et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature. 2011;470:279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature09692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van den Boogaard M, Wong LY, Tessadori F, Bakker ML, et al. Genetic variation in T-box binding element functionally affects SCN5A/SCN10A enhancer. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2519–2530. doi: 10.1172/JCI62613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng R, Rebolledo-Jaramillo B, Zong Y, Wang L, et al. Function of GATA factors in the adult mouse liver. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pu WT, Ishiwata T, Juraszek AL, Ma Q, Izumo S. GATA4 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of cardiac morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2004;275:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moskowitz IP, Wang J, Peterson MA, Pu WT, et al. Transcription factor genes Smad4 and Gata4 cooperatively regulate cardiac valve development. [corrected] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4006–4011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019025108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trivedi CM, Zhu W, Wang Q, Jia C, et al. Hopx and Hdac2 interact to modulate Gata4 acetylation and embryonic cardiac myocyte proliferation. Dev Cell. 2010;19:450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou P, He A, Pu WT. Regulation of GATA4 Transcriptional Activity in Cardiovascular Development and Disease. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2012;100:143–169. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387786-4.00005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dai YS, Cserjesi P, Markham BE, Molkentin JD. The transcription factors GATA4 and dHAND physically interact to synergistically activate cardiac gene expression through a p300-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:24390–24398. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202490200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129:823–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature. 2007;448:553–560. doi: 10.1038/nature06008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007;39:311–318. doi: 10.1038/ng1966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guenther MG, Levine SS, Boyer LA, Jaenisch R, Young RA. A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell. 2007;130:77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pekowska A, Benoukraf T, Zacarias-Cabeza J, Belhocine M, et al. H3K4 tri-methylation provides an epigenetic signature of active enhancers. EMBO J. 2011;30:4198–4210. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim TK, Hemberg M, Gray JM, Costa AM, et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature. 2010;465:182–187. doi: 10.1038/nature09033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Robertson AG, Bilenky M, Tam A, Zhao Y, et al. Genome-wide relationship between histone H3 lysine 4 mono- and tri-methylation and transcription factor binding. Genome Res. 2008;18:1906–1917. doi: 10.1101/gr.078519.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Visel A, Minovitsky S, Dubchak I, Pennacchio LA. VISTA Enhancer Browser--a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D88–D92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rojas A, Kong SW, Agarwal P, Gilliss B, et al. GATA4 is a direct transcriptional activator of cyclin D2 and Cdk4 and is required for cardiomyocyte proliferation in anterior heart field-derived myocardium. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:5420–5431. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00717-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stergachis AB, Neph S, Reynolds A, Humbert R, et al. Developmental fate and cellular maturity encoded in human regulatory DNA landscapes. Cell. 2013;154:888–903. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bushdid PB, Osinska H, Waclaw RR, Molkentin JD, Yutzey KE. NFATc3 and NFATc4 are required for cardiac development and mitochondrial function. Circ Res. 2003;92:1305–1313. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000077045.84609.9F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Molkentin JD, Lu JR, Antos CL, Markham B, et al. A calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway for cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 1998;93:215–228. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81573-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Saadane N, Alpert L, Chalifour LE. Altered molecular response to adrenoreceptor-induced cardiac hypertrophy in Egr-1-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H796–H805. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.3.H796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cirillo LA, Lin FR, Cuesta I, Friedman D, et al. Opening of compacted chromatin by early developmental transcription factors HNF3 (FoxA) and GATA-4. Mol Cell. 2002;9:279–289. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00459-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Driegen S, Ferreira R, van Zon A, Strouboulis J, et al. A generic tool for biotinylation of tagged proteins in transgenic mice. Transgenic Res. 2005;14:477–482. doi: 10.1007/s11248-005-7220-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jiao K, Kulessa H, Tompkins K, Zhou Y, et al. An essential role of Bmp4 in the atrioventricular septation of the mouse heart. Genes Dev. 2003;17:2362–2367. doi: 10.1101/gad.1124803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tarnavski O, McMullen JR, Schinke M, Nie Q, et al. Mouse cardiac surgery: comprehensive techniques for the generation of mouse models of human diseases and their application for genomic studies. Physiol Genomics. 2004;16:349–360. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00041.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.He A, Ma Q, Cao J, von Gise A, et al. Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Regulates Normal Development of the Mouse Heart. Circ Res. 2012;110:406–415. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.252205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:178–192. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–589. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1105–1111. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bailey TL. DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1653–1659. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gupta S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bailey TL, Noble WS. Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R24. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W202–W208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1017–1018. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McLean CY, Bristor D, Hiller M, Clarke SL, et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
NIHMS619134-supplement-1.pdf (3MB, pdf)

RESOURCES