Quantifying Human Mobility Perturbation and Resilience in Hurricane Sandy

Abstract

Human mobility is influenced by environmental change and natural disasters. Researchers have used trip distance distribution, radius of gyration of movements, and individuals' visited locations to understand and capture human mobility patterns and trajectories. However, our knowledge of human movements during natural disasters is limited owing to both a lack of empirical data and the low precision of available data. Here, we studied human mobility using high-resolution movement data from individuals in New York City during and for several days after Hurricane Sandy in 2012. We found the human movements followed truncated power-law distributions during and after Hurricane Sandy, although the β value was noticeably larger during the first 24 hours after the storm struck. Also, we examined two parameters: the center of mass and the radius of gyration of each individual's movements. We found that their values during perturbation states and steady states are highly correlated, suggesting human mobility data obtained in steady states can possibly predict the perturbation state. Our results demonstrate that human movement trajectories experienced significant perturbations during hurricanes, but also exhibited high resilience. We expect the study will stimulate future research on the perturbation and inherent resilience of human mobility under the influence of hurricanes. For example, mobility patterns in coastal urban areas could be examined as hurricanes approach, gain or dissipate in strength, and as the path of the storm changes. Understanding nuances of human mobility under the influence of such disasters will enable more effective evacuation, emergency response planning and development of strategies and policies to reduce fatality, injury, and economic loss.

Introduction

Natural disasters can cause extensive damage, economic loss and human suffering. According to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, over the period from 2000 through 2012 natural disasters have been responsible for killing 1.2 million people and affected the lives of 2.9 billion people [1]. Tropical cyclones, which include hurricanes and typhoons, are among the most severe natural disasters that cause tremendous loss of life and suffering [2]. This calls for a better understanding of human mobility during typhoons and hurricanes to aid evacuation, emergency response and immediate post-disaster relief [3], [4], [5]. Improved knowledge about human mobility can be used to reduce traffic jams [6], establish temporary communication networks [7], [8], and deliver critical information to reduce injuries, fatalities, and economic loss [9], [10].

Recent research has improved our understanding of general human mobility patterns but unfortunately we know comparatively little about human movements during disasters. Research has shown that human movements follow power-law distributions with scaling parameter values ranging from 1.59 to 1.75 [3], [11]. Individual movement trajectories exhibited similar shapes after being rescaled by the radius of gyration [3]. But, movement trajectories demonstrate uneven visitation frequency of different locations, repeatedly returning to certain locations while being less likely to visit new ones [12], [13]. At the city scale, movements follow similar distributions in different urban areas [14] and exhibit characteristics of periodicity to return to primary locations and unusual bursts during special events [15]. Also, human movements have been shown to follow highly efficient trajectory configurations during their daily movements [16]. While human mobility studies have improved our knowledge about general mobility patterns, it is intuitive to assume that disasters may perturb such routine movements [17], [18], [19] and even cause population migration [20]. Therefore, human mobility trajectories during disasters would deviate from steady states. Research on the topic of human mobility under the influence of disasters is limited perhaps owing to the inherent unpredictability of disasters and resulting data scarcity. Moreover, much empirically grounded human mobility research utilizes mobile phones to track human mobility [3], [12], [13], [16], [21]. The data precision of these studies is limited to the coverage area of each mobile phone tower, which is typically around 3 km². While such precision has been instrumental in developing an understanding of general patterns of human mobility over larger scales (e.g., a state or a country), it may lack the necessary precision to capture mobility changes caused by disasters and other extreme events that unfold at smaller scales (e.g., a building or a city). The necessity of high-resolution data cannot be ignored because many of those caught in the storm surge during hurricanes and typhoons may have been spared if they had evacuated a short distance to higher ground.

Methodology

We study the perturbation and resilience of human mobility patterns during and after Hurricane Sandy—one of the largest tropical storms recorded in the Atlantic Ocean that affected millions of people [22], [23]—which struck the northeastern seaboard of the United States leading to significant injury and loss of human life in October 2012. The study used high-resolution data from Twitter which were collected from 4pm Oct. 29, 2012—the day Hurricane Sandy landed in New York City—through 4pm Nov. 10, 2012. During the 12-day data collection period, a total of 702,188 tweets were collected from a total of 53,934 distinct individuals. The volume of data collected each day is provided in Table S1. We located each user using geolocation information attached to each tweet which contains a longitude and latitude geographical coordinate. The coordinates are high resolution with accuracy to approximately 10 meters.

Results and Discussion

After mapping each recorded location during every 24-hour period, we observed that movement locations covered nearly the entire mapped area and showed similar geographical distribution to 24-hour periods soon after the hurricane (Fig. 1A, 1C, and 1E). This observation suggests that New York City residents were relatively resilient in terms of human mobility during Hurricane Sandy. While such resilience could be vital for the city's post-disaster response and recovery, it may also be life threatening during an extreme event such as a hurricane. Overlapping the location and movement data with the mandated evacuation areas reveals that human activities were still observed in evacuation zones although people were ordered to evacuate, (Fig. 1A and 1B). Regrettably, several fatalities occurred in these evacuation zones.

Figure 1. Geographical distribution of visited locations and movement trajectories over 24-hour periods.

A, C, and E, locations visited by Twitter users. B, D, and F, movement trajectories of Twitter users. The insets in A and B show an enlarged map of the lower Manhattan area. Red areas indicate the evacuated zones enforced by New York City government, though some of the areas were still active with human activity/mobility in this 24-hour period. The green nodes indicate the locations where fatalities occurred.

To discover whether human movements were disrupted, we also mapped each individual's unique mobility trajectory during each 24-hour period. We found the movement trajectories in the post-disaster period exhibited similar patterns (Fig. 1D and 1F), radiating from Manhattan to other areas, with the exception of the trajectories in the first 24-hour period. To test if the observed difference was mathematically significant, we posed the following hypothesis:

Hypothesis 1: During Hurricane Sandy, the human mobility distribution was significantly perturbed.

To explore this hypothesis, we calculated all the distances between consecutive locations from each distinct user. The displacement distributions for these travel ranges are provided in Table S2. We found that while short-distance trips (Δr<1 km) increased during the first 24-hour period, longer-distance travels significantly decreased (Fig. 2A). Also, the total displacements (Δr) for each 24-hour period followed a truncated power-law distribution, though with different values (Fig. 2B). During the first 24-hour period during which Hurricane Sandy struck New York City, the scale-invariance β value of the distribution was 1.73, the exponential cutoff value λ was 2.70×10⁻⁵, and the minimum fitting value κ was 591 m. During the 11 other 24-hour data collection periods, the β value was 1.19±0.06, the λ value was (6.13±0.69) ×10⁻⁵, and the cutoff value κ was 4 m. The change of the β values is primarily the result of the larger optimized cut-off value of the first 24-hour displacement data. The reduction of longer-distance travels and the substantial differences between β and κ values allowed us to reject the null hypothesis and confirm that a perturbation of human mobility occurred during Hurricane Sandy. The differences between the calculated β values here and the values reported in other studies [3], [11] perhaps are owing to the fact that the values in our study were derived from higher precision location data in a more tightly constrained geographical area. It is worth noting, however, that the truncated power-law distribution discovered here is similar to the human mobility patterns identified in those studies.

Figure 2. Human mobility perturbation.

A, Statistical distribution of displacements for each 24-hour period. Each line represents the change of numbers of trips within different ranges of displacements. B, Displacement distribution for each 24-hour period. Each line represents a probability density function P(Δr). All plotted distributions followed a truncated power-law distribution (Table S3).

The results confirm that Hurricane Sandy perturbed human mobility patterns. However, the results reveal other important insights regarding human mobility perturbation during Hurricane Sandy in New York City. First, the distribution of the perturbation bears strong similarity to daily movement distributions in the following 11-day period. We also analyzed data from November 2013—one year later—in New York City and compared the results with the 11-day period of data collected in 2012. The two sets of results showed strong similarity, which confirms that typical, steady state daily human movements follow truncated power-law distribution with the β value around 1.19. Second, the most significant human mobility perturbation appears to have lasted less than 24 hours as the β value returned to a normal level on Oct. 30, 2012. This brief change in human mobility indicates that New York City residents were resilient to the effects of Hurricane Sandy. This resilience in human mobility was the case even as most public transportation only started to resume partial or full schedule service 36 to 72 hours after Hurricane Sandy struck [24] and over 1 million people in the city were still without power until 2pm Nov. 2 [25].

While Fig. 2A and 2B show a clear deviation between the mobility distribution of the first 24-hour period and the distributions of the other 24-hour periods, demonstrating that Hurricane Sandy perturbed human mobility in New York City, it raises new questions: how did people change their movements and do these changes correlate to movements in non-perturbed states? To explore these questions, we mapped each individual's movement trajectory over each 24-hour period to examine perturbations at the individual level. Individuals generally exhibited two perturbation trends: shifting their movements to a different place or places, and changing their travel distances. To quantify the observed perturbation, we calculated the center of mass () and the radius of gyration (r_g) for each active individual's trajectory during the 24-hour perturbation state (P) and the relatively steady state from Nov. 3 to Nov. 9 (S). An individual is considered active if the user had at least 5 data entries during both the perturbation state and the steady state. We found that 2,241 individuals qualified as active users during these periods and they transmitted 34,386 entries during the perturbation state and 128,904 entries during the steady state period. The mobility perturbation can be defined by two parameters: the shifting distance of the center of mass , and the radius of gyration in perturbation state r_g^P. To examine whether the values of these parameters can be projected using the values from steady states or whether disasters make human movements chaotic, we tested two additional hypotheses:

Hypothesis 2a: Δd_CM positively correlates with r_g^N.

Hypothesis 2b: r_g^P positively correlates with r_g^N.

We first analyzed Δd_CM and found that the values followed a stretched exponential distribution (see Materials S1). We also found the values strongly correlate with r_g^N (correlation coefficient  = 0.59, p<0.001). Larger values of r_g^N can result in larger shifting distances in the center of movements for individuals. The shifting distance Δd_CM follows (Fig. 3A red line). The fitting results for this are provided in Table S4. The green line in Fig. 3A shows where Δd_CM equals r_g^N. We can see that with the increase of r_g^N, Δd_CM converges toward the green line. Therefore, we can reject the null hypothesis for Hypothesis 2a, finding support that r_g^N can possibly be used to predict the shift of the center of movements. This implies that a person needs to move to a safer place during a hurricane in order to sustain their mobility.

Figure 3. Relation between perturbation states and steady states.

A, Δd_CM versus r_g^N. The correlation coefficient between the two parameters is 0.59 (p<0.001). The red line is the fitted function of the correlation where (m). The green line in Fig. 3A indicates where Δd_CM equals r_g^N. B, r_g^P versus r_g^N. The notations are the same as in A. The correlation coefficient between these two parameters is 0.25 (p<0.001) with fitted function (m).

We then examined whether a correlation exists between r_g^P and r_g^N. We found that r_g^P follows a truncated power-law distribution (see Materials S1). The value of r_g^P was 1.19, approximating the value reported in a previous study [3] (∼1.20). However, we did not find such a property in r_g^N. This finding implies that cutting the heavy tails of long-distance travels could change the general pattern found in the radius of gyration in human movements. Pairing r_g^P and r_g^N, we found their correlation can be captured with the function (Fig. 3B). The green line in Fig. 3B shows where r_g^P equals r_g^N. Most people decreased their r_g^P, i.e., scaled down their areas of movement, during Hurricane Sandy. With the increase of r_g^N, this trend became more evident. The correlation between the two parameters resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.25 (p<0.001), and therefore, the null hypothesis for Hypotheses 2b can be rejected. This implies that r_g^N can be used to predict r_g^P.

Our results demonstrate that, although Hurricane Sandy did impact the mobility patterns of individuals in New York City, the perturbation was surprisingly brief and the mobility patterns encouragingly resilient. This resilience occurred even in the large-scale absence of mobility infrastructure. While human movements followed truncated power-law distributions in perturbed and steady states, their mobility-related behaviors did exhibit important changes. That is, people changed the center of their movements and their travel distances as they sought shelter.

Conclusions

Our finding that steady state shifts in the center of mass (Δd_CM) and the radius of gyration (r_g^N) of daily individual trajectories correlate with perturbed states is particularly interesting. Human mobility appears to possess an inherent resilience—even in perturbed states—such that movement deviations, in aggregate, follow predictable patterns in hurricanes. Therefore, it may be possible to use human mobility data collected in steady states to predict perturbation states during extreme events and, as a result, develop strategies to improve evacuation effectiveness and speed critical disaster response to minimize loss of life and human suffering.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Data Volume for Each 24-Hour Period.

(DOC)

Table S2

Displacement Distribution.

(DOC)

Table S3

Displacement Fitting Results.

(DOC)

Table S4

Fitting Results between the Center of Mass and the Radius of Gyration.

(DOC)

Materials S1

Detailed description of methods used for data collection and analysis. This also includes supporting findings and figures relating to the analytical results of the shifting distance of the center of movements and radius of gyrations.

(DOC)

Data Availability

The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. Due to Twitter's policy, the longitudes of the data were modified so the locations are shown in an area close to Beijing, China, instead of New York City where the data were actually collected. The authors conducted additional analyses and confirmed that the results calculated by the Haversine formula based on the modified data had no difference from the ones based on the original data. The displacement data from each day and the locations of active users during perturbed and steady states are available from DRYAD using the DOI doi:10.5061/dryad.jv577.

Funding Statement

This study is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1142379. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Open access publication of this article was supported by Virginia Tech's Open Access Subvention Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.