Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2014 Oct 30;3:e04478. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04478

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2014, Peck and Salzman

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

PMC Copyright notice

Author response image 2. — Amygdala firing rate selectivity for aborted trials. (A and B) Example neuron cue-aligned firing rates for aborted (dashed lines) and non-aborted trials (solid lines) on R-present trials (left; R-contra, R-ipsi) and R-absent trials (right; P-contra, P-ipsi). Shading indicates standard error across trials. Note that firing rates for abort trials are not plotted in cases where there were less than 6 aborts. (A) Neuron with reward selectivity and spatial-reward selectivity indices <0.5 in all time epochs (p<0.05). Abort selectivity was significant only on P-contra trials in the 700-1000 ms epoch (index = 0.70, p<0.05). (B) Neuron with reward selectivity and spatial-reward selectivity indices >0.5 in all time epochs (p<0.05). Abort selectivity was significant only on P-contra trials in the 700-1000 ms epoch (index = 0.39, p<0.05). Different y-axis ranges are used for R-present and R-absent trials to illustrate abort selectivity. (C) Relationship between reward selectivity and abort selectivity indices on punishment-contra trials for each time epoch. Plot style indicates the significance of selectivity indices (see legend); solid lines indicate significant regressions (p<0.05).