Abstract
The herbicides diclofop-methyl and the fungicide difenoconazole are widely used in agriculture and may lead to serious toxicity risks. However, limited studies have been done to evaluate differences in the metabolic effects of these herbicides. Difenoconazole (10 mg/kg) and Diclofop-methyl (1 mg/kg) were orally administrated individually (Groups 1 and 2 respectively) as well as combined (G3) to rats for 28 days. In all treated groups, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and urea were significantly higher than the control group. Plasma creatinine was also significantly higher in groups G1 and G2 than control. Significant inhibition in gamma glutamyltransferase (γGT) was observed in all treated groups, in addition to significant inhibition of plasma acetylcholinesterase enzyme (AChE) in G3 (p < 0.01). There was no effect in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and albumin. Total plasma triiodothy-ronine (T3) hormone was significantly higher in groups G2 and G3 (p < 0.01), but significantly lower in G1 group as compared to control. Thyroxin (T4) was significantly lower in all treated groups than control. Cholesterol level was significantly lower in G3 than control, and a total protein (TP) was significantly higher in all treated groups than control. No differences were observed in glucose levels. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), an oxidative stress biomarker, was significantly increased in all treated groups comparing to control. Sulphur containing protein (SH-protein) was significantly lower in G1 than control. No significant changes were observed for GST in all treatments. The significant differences in measured biomarkers after application of diclofop-methyl, difenoconazole individually and combined indicate that the investigated pesticides may have potentially harmful effects on humans and the surrounding environment. We suggest that larger studies be conducted to better understand the toxicity mechanisms of these pesticides.
Keywords: Oxidative stress, biomarkers, acetylcholinesterase, diclofop-methyl, difenoconazole, stress markers
Introduction
Chemical compounds, which are used for controlling all kinds of pests and weeds, are continuously required for global food production, but they remain as residues in food, air, and water [1-4]. This widespread use of chemicals results in continued exposure of humans to these chemicals and their residues. Low-level exposure is known to produce a variety of biochemical changes, such as alteration of target cell receptor binding proteins, DNA mutation generation, as well as induction/inhibition of enzymatic activities [5].
Diclofop-methyl, (methyl 2-[4-(2, 4-dichlorophenoxy) phenoxy] propanoate) a phenoxyherbicide, is a selective post-emergence graminicide in the phenoxy propionate group of herbicides, developed for control of wild oats, wild millets, and other annual grass weeds [6,7]. Very few data are available on the environmental impact of diclofop-methyl. Diclofop-methyl might affect the fatty acid synthesis by acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibition, cell membrane destruction, assimilates translocated to roots prevention, chlorophyll content reduction, as well as photosynthesis and meristem activity inhibition. It is absorbed primarily through the leaves, and partly through the roots in moist soil. Total annual domestic usage of diclofop-methyl is approximately 750,000 pounds of active ingredient [8]. Long term exposure to high concentrations of diclofop-methyl may cause abnormal changes in lung function, i.e. pneumoconiosis. Prolonged contact with chlorinated biphenyl ethers may cause skin irritation, weight loss and liver injury [9,10].
Difenoconazole, 1-[2-[2-chloro-4-(4-chlorophenoxy) phenyl]-4-methyl-1, 3-dioxolan-2-ylmeth-yl]-1H-1, 2, 4-triazole, is a systemic fungicide with novel broad-range activity protecting the yield and crop quality by foliar application or seed treatment. This fungicide is a steroid demethylation inhibitor acting mainly on the vegetative stage of fungi by blocking the mycelial growth either inside or on the surface of the host plant [11]. Difenoconazole (triazole derivative) and diclofop (phenoxypropionic acid derivative) are widely used for crop protection in most countries. Hence, consumers can be exposed to their residues in food and water and farm workers can be exposed during application [12]. Incorrect application and failure to use protective gears while applying fungicides are responsible for irritant injuries to skin and mucous membranes, as well as dermal sensitization [13]. Agricultural pesticides are often used in combination to protect crops. Fungicides are often used in combination with other pesticides and carriers or solvents which may be more toxic [14]. The combined effect across different classes of pesticides is more difficult to predict [15]. Few studies have begun to characterize the toxicological effects of pesticides mixture exposure [16-18].
The purpose of this investigation is to determine and compare the effects of difenconazole (triazole derivative fungicide), diclofop-methyl (phenoxypropionic acid derivative herbicide), and the joint effect of both on the biochemical activities in liver, kidney and thyroid gland in adult male albino rats and to determine residual levels of the two compounds in the rat livers and kidneys.
Materials and methods
Materials
The formulations and active ingredients of used pesticides; diclofop-methyl (Iloxan 36% EC was obtained from Samtrade Ltd, Egypt) and difenconazole (Score 25% EC was obtained from Syngenta Ltd, Egypt). All other chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma (Sigma, USA).
Animals
Twenty adult males Wistar albino rats (Rattus norvegicus), (10 weeks old, weighing 210±10 grams), were obtained from the Egyptian Organization for Biological Products and Vaccine, Egypt. Animals were housed under controlled environmental conditions (23±2°C and a 12-hour light/dark cycle). The rats were allowed free access to laboratory diet and tap water. Rats were acclimatized for one week prior to the start of experiment. All animals were treated according to the standard procedures laid down by OECD guidelines and EPA protocol [19,20], for repeated dose oral toxicity study in rodents. The protocol of this study was approved by the Department of Mammalian Toxicology, Pesticide Central Laboratory, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.
Experimental design
Male albino rats were divided into four groups of 5 each as per the following details. The first group (G1) was treated with the lowest observed effect level (LOEL) of difenoconazole (10 mg Kg-1 body weight [bw]). The second group (G2) was treated with LOEL of 1 mg Kg-1 bw of diclofop-methyl. The third group (G3) was treated with a mixture of difenoconazole and diclofop-methyl at concentration 10 and 1 mg Kg-1 bw, respectively. The fourth group (C) served as control. 1 ml of the reconstituted pesticides was orally administered to all groups. Injections were freshly prepared prior to application, and treatment was continued for four weeks, 5 times/week. The treatment doses were re-adjusted according to changes in the animals’ body weights.
Sampling
Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital plexus vein according to Schalm et al, [20] into heparinized tubes at the end of the 28-day treatment period. Animals were sacrificed by cerebral dislocation. Plasma samples were separated by centrifugation of the blood samples at 3600 rpm for 15 min in a refrigerated centrifuge at 4°C. Plasma samples were kept at -20°C and analyzed within less than 48 hours.
Biochemical analysis
Plasma transaminases (AST and ALT) activities were determined [22] using an assay kit (BioMerieux Sa, USA). γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) activity was determined [23] according of Szasz kinetic method (Stanbio Laboratory, Spain). Plasma acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was assayed by the method of Ellman et al, [24]. Albumin and urea levels were determined [25] by calorimetric method of Doumas et al and Fawcett and Scott, respectively (BioMerieux Sa, USA). Plasma creatinine was determined by the calorimetric method of Schirmeister (Randox Labororatories, UK) [27].
The plasma level of cholesterol and glucose were determined using an analytical kit (BioMerieux Sa, USA). Standard and quantitative assay for determination of total protein content done based on the method of Bradford [30] by using bovine serum albumin (Sigma) and Commasic Brillant Blue. Plasma Tri-iodothyronine (T3) and Thyroxine (T4) hormones were performed using radioimmunoassay kit (DPC Co., USA), by the method of Britton et al [31]. The oxidative stress biomarkers were determined by the following methods: Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) lipid peroxidation biomarker was measured according to Okhawa et al, [32] after incubation for 30 minutes at 95°C with thiobarbituric acid in aerobic conditions (pH 3.4). Color change was measured on spectrophotometer at 532 nm. Plasma total SH-proteins was determined by spectrophotometer at 412 nm using DTNB as a reagent according to Hu and Dillard [33]. Plasma glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity was determined using the method of Habig et al, [34] (1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB)-GSH conjugate for-med at 37°C and assayed at 340 nm on spectrophotometer). Total superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured using the method of Misra and Frindovich [35]. This method is based on superoxide anion generation by pyrogallol, at room temperature. Superoxide anions reduce Nitro Blue Tetrazolium to blue formazans. SOD catalyses dismutation of radicals and inhibits the formation of formazans. One unit of SOD was defined as the amount of the enzyme which inhibits the rate of the photoreduction by 50%.
Residual analysis
One gram of homogenate tissue was placed in a 90 mm glass mortar with 4 g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and gently grounded to obtain a homogeneous material. The MgSO4 -tissue mixture was transferred to a clean 50 ml polypropylene centrifuge tube. 10 ml acetonitrile with 1% acetic acid was added before centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes [36,37]. Afterwards, 3 ml of the supernatant were transferred to a clean 5 ml centrifuge tube containing 450 mg of MgSO4 and 125 mg of Primary Secondary Amine (PSA), hand-shake for 30 s, sonicated for 1 minute and centrifuged for 5 min at 4000 rpm [38]. The final extract (2 ml) was evaporated to dryness under a gentle stream of N2 for analysis.
The stock solution of diclofop-methyl and difenoconazole was prepared in acetonitrile at 1 mg/ml. Working solutions were prepared by dilution with acetonitrile and calibration curves were generated by plotting peak area versus concentration. Standard calibration curves presented excellent linearity with regression coefficient r > 0.998 and 0.982 with good separation and repeatability for diclofop-methyl and difenoconazole, respectively. The calibration curve of six different concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg g-1) were analysed individually for each herbicide and recovery study were repeated three times. The mean recovery values obtained from spiked samples with two levels (0.1 and 1.0 µg g-1) of tested pesticides standards ranged from 90-93% for diclofop-methyl and 85-91% for difenoconazole, respectively.
Agilent 7890 (USA) gas chromatography coupled with electron capture detector GC-ECD was used to determine diclofop-methyl residues, using capillary column HP-5 (30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 µm). Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. The following temperature program was employed: initial temperature of 180°C held for 1 min; increased from 25°C min-1 to 220, held for 2 minutes and another increase at 3°C min-1 to reach 245°C. The injector temperature was 220°C. The injection volume was 1 µl for all standards and samples. The Agilent-1100 (Agilent, USA) high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system consisting of a quaternary pump system, diode array detector (DAD) was used for the determination of difenoconazole. Chemistation software was used to control the LC components and to process ultraviolet data. C18 analytical column (150 mm×4.6 mm, 5 µm) was used. Solvent A (water) and solvent B (acetonitrile) were combined on isocratic conditions (30-70 A: B v/v). The flow rate was 0.7 ml/min, and the column heater was set at 25°C. The investigated analysts were eluted within 5 min. Difenoconazole residue was monitored at the absorbance wavelength of 200 nm.
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows. Prior to parametric tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate data for normality. All values presented in the text were expressed as mean±standard error (SE). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) one-way test [39,40] was used to compare differences between groups. Least Significant Differences (LSD) test was used to identify all biochemical parameters that differed between groups. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Joint action analysis for treatments was calculated using relative interaction index (RII) according to Mansour et al, [41], using relative interaction index (RII) according to the following equation:
Interaction index = (mixture value +control value)/lvalue individual compounds in the mixture
Where;
a. In cases of positive effect on the baseline values (increase or more release of an enzyme activity): I.I.=1 for additive effect, ≥ 1 for potentiation, or ≤ 1 for antagonism;
b. In cases of negative effect on the baseline values (decrease or inhibition of an enzyme activity): I.I.=1 for additive effect, ≤ 1 for potentiation, or ≥ 1 for antagonism.
Results
Biochemical parameters
Table 1 shows that low dose treatment with difenoconazole and diclofop-methyl induced higher levels of plasma liver biomarker enzymes (ALT) in all groups, specifically in G1 and G2 than controls (p < 0.01). Furthermore, significantly decreased levels in plasma γ-gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) in all treated groups versus controls were recorded (p-values < 0.01) and a significantly lower mean plasma acetylcholine esterase (AChE) in G3 than other groups including controls (p-values < 0.01). Meanwhile, kidney function biomarkers, urea and creatinine showed significantly higher levels in all treated groups versus controls (p-values < 0.01). There was no significant difference in albumin concentrations between groups.
Table 1.
Control | G1 | G2 | G3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALT (U/L) | 42.38±1.39 | 67.16±3.91** | 58.60±3.35** | 45.57±2.16 |
AST (U/L) | 124.26±8.54 | 128.28±12.61 | 151.08±5.53 | 151.62±7.37 |
GGT (U/L) | 6.87±0.46 | 2.99±0.21** | 4.15±0.39** | 3.56±0.34** |
AChE (U/L) | 324.74±19.96 | 307.40±18.17 | 311.59±21.05 | 234.97±19.96** |
Albumin (g/dl) | 1.91±0.19 | 1.62±0.15 | 1.90±0.12 | 1.81±0.16 |
Urea (g/dl) | 39.125±3.57 | 57.90±1.41** | 78.46±4.81** | 73.68±4.76** |
Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.47±0.02 | 0.68±0.03** | 0.71±0.06** | 0.55±0.02 |
G1: Rats treated with Difenoconazole, G2: Rats treated with diclofop-methyl, G3: Rats treated with mixture;
p ≤ 0.01 compared with control group.
All data were expressed as mean±SE from 5 animals.
Table 2 shows significantly higher total plasma mean triiodothyronine (T3) levels in G2 and G3 treated groups than others (p-values < 0.01). On the other hand, mean plasma thyroxin (T4) was significantly lower in all treated groups (p-values < 0.001). A significantly lower mean plasma cholesterol was observed in G3 as compared to other groups (p-values < 0.01), while no differences among groups were recorded in glucose levels. Finally, the plasma mean total proteins (TP) was significantly higher in all treated groups than controls (p-values < 0.05).
Table 2.
Control | G1 | G2 | G3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
T3 (ng/dl) | 44.40±3.80 | 24.09±1.73 | 135.92±11.74** | 118.96±4.79** |
T4 (ng/dl) | 9.84±0.56 | 3.99±0.31** | 5.11±0.47** | 5.17±0.39** |
Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 37.11±2.27 | 41.57±3.55 | 38.22±2.91 | 28.30±2.62* |
Glucose (mg/dl) | 217.92±14.07 | 237.64±19.40 | 235.58±20.14 | 202.75±12.94 |
T. Protein (g/dl) | 5.01±0.27 | 8.09±0.67** | 6.73±0.52* | 6.78±0.60* |
G1: Rats treated with Difenoconazole, G2: Rats treated with diclofop-methyl, G3: Rats treated with mixture;
significant differences at p ≤ 0.05,
significant differences at p ≤ 0.01.
All data were expressed as mean±SE from 5 animals.
As far as the oxidative stress biomarker, MDA levels were significantly higher in all treated groups compared than controls (Table 3). This difference is in parallel with the significantly lower plasma total thiol containing protein (SH-protein) in G1 group only versus control at p < 0.01. Despite the weak alteration in GST activity in plasma of G1, G2 and G3 treated animals, there was a significantly higher SOD activity in all treated groups than controls (p-values < 0.01).
Table 3.
Control | G1 | G2 | G3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MDA (mmol/dl) | 4.05±0.31 | 11.78±1.06** | 8.94±0.73** | 15.83±0.31** |
SH protein (mg/dl) | 49.74±4.60 | 33.20±1.99** | 45.02±3.82 | 51.41±2.73 |
GST (mmol/min/ml) | 448.37±14.68 | 396.47±38.82 | 496.39±16.97 | 420.96±30.18 |
SOD (U/ml) | 128.6±10.17 | 373.54±28.62** | 269.75±14.67** | 285.63±14.98** |
G1: Rats treated with Difenoconazole, G2: Rats treated with diclofop-methyl, G3: Rats treated with mixture;
significant differences at p ≤ 0.01.
All data were expressed as mean±SE from 5 animals.
Joint action analysis
The data obtained from Tables 1, 2 and 3 were considered as cases of positive effect on the baseline values (increase or more release of an enzyme) were found with ALT, urea creatinine T3, total protein, MDA, SH-protein and SOD. While the data of the other biochemical measurements (ã-GT, AChE and cholesterol) were considered as cases of negative effects on the baseline values (decrease or inhibition of an enzyme activity).
Table 4 presents the joint action analysis and interaction index of the mixture of difenoconazole and diclofop-methyl on the different studied biochemical parameters. In the case of positive effects: (I.I.=1 for additive effect, ≥ 1 for potentiation, or ≤ 1 for antagonism) but in case of negative effects: (I.I.=1 for additive effect, ≤ 1 for potentiation, or ≥ 1 for antagonism). Generally, the tested mixture showed different types of interaction with measured biochemical biomarkers according to the following:
Table 4.
Parameters | Effect | Interaction Index (I.I.) | Joint action |
---|---|---|---|
Triiodothyronine (T3) | Increase | 1.00 | Additive |
Thyroxine (T4) | Decrease | 1.65 | Antagonism |
Cholesterol | Decrease | 0.82 | Potentiation |
Total protein | Increase | 0.80 | Antagonism |
Alanine aminotransferase | Increase | 0.70 | Antagonism |
Gamma glutamyl transferase | Decrease | 1.46 | Antagonism |
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) | Decrease | 0.90 | Potentiation |
Urea | Increase | 0.83 | Antagonism |
Creatinine | Increase | 0.73 | Antagonism |
Malondialdehyde (MDA) | Increase | 0.98 | Additive |
SH protein | Increase | 1.29 | Potentiation |
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) | Increase | 0.64 | Antagonism |
Interaction Index=(Mixture value+Control value)/Σ values of individual compounds in the mixture.
1. Potentiating interaction was found in acetyl cholinesterase, cholesterol and SH-Protein.
2. Antagonistic interaction was found in some biochemical biomarkers including liver, kidney, thyroid function and some stress and antioxidant biomarkers such as ALT, γ-GT, creatinine, urea, T4, total protein and SOD.
3. Additive interaction was found in T3, and MDA.
Residue levels analysis in liver and kidneys
Table 5 shows that difenoconazole residues were below the limit of detection (0.01 µg g-1) in both liver and kidney tissue samples alone (G1) or in mixture with diclofop-methyl (G3). On the other hand, diclofop-methyl was detected in liver and kidney tissues of treated male rats (G2), at levels 1.17 and 0.5 µg g-1 for liver and kidney tissues, respectively. In addition, only diclofop-methyl was detected at levels of 0.31 and 0.172 µg g-1 in the liver and kidney tissues collected from rats treated with the mixed pesticides, respectively.
Table 5.
G1 | G2 | G3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Difenoconazole | Diclofop-methyl | Diclofop-methyl | Difenoconazole | |
Liver | nd | 1.17 | 0.31 | nd |
Kidney | nd | 0.5 | 0.17 | nd |
Sum ∑ | - | 1.67 | 0.48 | - |
G1: Rats treated with Difenoconazole, G2: Rats treated with diclofop-methyl, G3: Rat treated with mixture, -: not treated and nd: not detected under experimental conditions.
Discussion
In the present study, rats treated with each compound individually induced elevation in ALT enzyme levels. These results are in agreement with the previous report that recorded an induction in hepatotoxicity and elevation in liver biomarker enzymes in male Fischer rats treated with 0.6 or 1.0 mmol/kg of 3-(3, 5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione (DCPT) [42]. Moreover, Diuron herbicide exposure induced slight increases in serum AST and ALT levels confirming increased hepatic activity. Our results also showed a significant reduction in γ-GT levels in all treated groups.
The present results also revealed higher urea levels in all treated groups, while the plasma creatinine was higher in groups G1 and G2. These results are consistent with the findings of Christine et al, [42] in Fischer rats treated with econazole fungicide. Taybe et al, [43] observed that administration of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic herbicide in adult rats provoked a reduction in glomerular filtration rate objectified by the reduced creatinine clearance and a decline of creatinine excretion consistent with renal failure.
Endocrine disruptors, which are mainly lipophilic herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and related compounds have been widely produced and distributed to improve agricultural production. These chemicals can bioaccumulate in the lipids of organisms in the environment and have relatively high coefficients for adsorption into sediments and soils [44,45].
The higher total plasma T3 hormone in both of G2 and G3 treated groups and lower T4 in all treated groups are in agreement with a previous report by Wolf et al, [46] that rats treated with triadimefon induced thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy, increased follicular cell proliferation and colloid depletion accompanied by decreased T3 and T4 serum levels with no increase in TSH levels [46]. A study reported that chronic treatment with econazole induced degeneration in thyroid gland function and tissue structure [47]. Furthermore, T4 levels drastically decreased after three daily injections of dichlorophenol-nitrophenyl ether herbicide (NIT) at 1000 mg/kg/day, while T3 levels and body weight index (BMI) were relatively unaffected even in the highest dosage group [48]. These observations were also confirmed in the present study as reflected by the alteration in several markers influenced by thyroid activity like cholesterol (decreased in G3) and total proteins (increased in all treated groups).
Our findings also showed that exposure to difenoconazole (G1) and diclofop-methyl (G2) induced significant elevations in MDA and reduction in total thiol proteins (SH-protein). Numerous works have shown that increased circulating free radicals can be due induced by phenoxyacetic acid herbicides derivatives [49-51]. Lipid peroxidation has been suggested as one of the molecular mechanisms involved in 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic herbicide induced toxicity [43]. Also, bromuconazole-induced toxicity could be attributed to the production of reactive oxygen species as well as depressing endogenous antioxidants and enhancing lipid peroxidation [52,53]. Previous gene expression analysis of liver tissues from propiconazole-treated mice identified genes and pathways involved in oxidative stress, suggesting that oxidative stress may play a role in propiconazole-induced toxicity [54].
Our results revealed that there was potentiation interaction recorded in acetyl cholinesterase, whereas antagonistic interaction was found in ALT, γ-GT, creatinine, albumin, urea, T4, cholesterol, glucose and total protein. Furthermore, additive interactions were found in AST, T3, MDA and GST. Humans may get exposed to one or more pesticides through food intake. However, workers in pesticide manufacturing and packing units and agricultural workers who prepare, mix, and apply pesticides in the fields are directly exposed to more than one pesticide on the same or on successive days [55]. Mansour et al, [56], recorded the tested mixture might be of lower “toxic insult” and be safer than other illegal mixed applications of pesticide.
Results of many investigated pesticides indicate that toxins are absorbed and carried to the liver, where the metabolizing enzymes responsible for both the bio-activation and detoxification are present [57]. In our study, diclofop-methyl residues was determined using highly specific detector (ECD) which increased the probability of detection even at very low concentrations of this pesticides in different tissues. The herbicide difenoconazole might be present in concentrations below the limit of detection using HPLC-DAD. Syngenta Ltd. study reported that difenconazole is rapidly and totally eliminated in urine and feces after oral administration [58]. Residues in tissues were not significant and there was no evidence for accumulation [59]. The residual levels of diclofop-methyl detected in both liver and kidney in the present study support the findings of Bayer Ltd which reported that when diclofop-methyl was fed to rats, about 90% is recovered unchanged in feces and urine in 2 days, and about 99% after 7 days [60]. Accumulation of residues of diclofop-methyl in the body was unlikely, and low levels of total residues were found in organs and tissues 7 days after a single dose of 1.8 mg/kg b.w [59].
Conclusion
In conclusion, treatment of male albino rats with the fungicide difenoconazole alone and the herbicide diclofop-methyl alone induced significant alterations in the different biochemical parameters. The combined effect of the two pesticides also had varied effects on most investigated parameters. The study clearly showed an inhibition of AChE activity, suggesting this enzyme as a good indicator of intoxication of erythrocytes by both pesticides. The study also demonstrated an increase of lipid peroxidation in rats exposed to diclofop-methyl and difenoconazole and their mixture. Exposure to these investigated pesticides could potentially harm human health and the surrounding environment. Further studies are needed to better understand the toxicity mechanisms of these pesticides.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Science Research Center.
Abbreviations
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- γGT
Gamma glutamyl transferase
- AChE
Acetylcholinesterase
- T3
Triiodothyronine
- T4
Thyroxine
- TP
Total Proteins
- MDA
Malondaldehyde
- GST
Glutathione S transferase
- SOD
Super-Oxide dismutase
- Ad
Additive
- An
Antagonism
- Po
Potentiation
- SH protein
sulphur containing protein
- GC
Gas chromatography
- HPLC
High performance liquid chromatography
References
- 1.Astiz M, de Alaniz MJ, Marra CA. Antioxidant defense system in rats simultaneously intoxicated with agrochemicals. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009;28:465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bolognesi C, Morasso G. Enotoxicity of pesticides: potential risk for consumers. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2000;11:182–187. [Google Scholar]
- 3.John S, Kale M, Rathore N, Bhatnagar D. Protective effect of vitamin E in dimethoate and malathion induced oxidative stress in rat erythrocytes. J Nutr Biochem. 2001;12:500–504. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2863(01)00160-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thiruchelvam M, Richfield EK, Goodman BM, Baggs RB, Cory-Slechta DA. Developmental exposure to the pesticides paraquat and maneb and the Parkinson’s disease phenotype. Neurotoxicology. 2002;23:621–633. doi: 10.1016/s0161-813x(02)00092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lopez O, Hernández AF, Rodrigo L, Gil F, Pena G, Serrano JL, Parrón T, Vil-lanueva E, Pla A. Changes in antioxidant enzymes in humans with long-term exposure to pesticides. Toxicol Lett. 2007;171:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shimabukuro HR, Hoffer BL. Enantiomers of diclofop-methyl and their role in herbicide mechanism of action. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 1995;51:68–82. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu G, Peng W, Donghui L, Yuele L, Zhiqiang Z. Stereoselective degradation of diclofop-methyl in soil and Chinese cabbage. Pesticide Biochem Physiol. 2008;92:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nestler HJ, Bieringer HZ, Naturforsch B. Synthesis and herbicidal effect of the D- and L-methyl 2-[dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propionate enantiomers. Anorganische Chemie & Organische Chemie. 1980;35:366. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Silva S, Pinto G, Correia B, Pinto-Carnide O, Santos C. Rye oxidative stress under long term Al exposure. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170:879–889. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takayama S, Sieber SM, Dalgard DW, Thorgeirsson UP, Adamson RH. Effects of long-term oral administration of DDT on nonhuman primates. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999;125:219–225. doi: 10.1007/s004320050266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khalfallah S, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U, Constantinidou HA. Dissipation study of the fungicide Tetraconazole on greenhouse-sprayed cucumbers. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46:1614–1617. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Danuta P, Jan KL, Grazyna K, Joanna K, Bozena W, Krystyna L. Studies of early hepatocellular proliferation and peroxisomal proliferation in Wistar rats treated with herbicide diclofop. Toxicology. 2001;158:119–126. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00371-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.James EL. Agricultural-medicine-a-practical-guide. Springer; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Osweiler GD, Carlson TL, Buck WB, Von Gelder GA. Organic Synthetic Fungicides. Dubuque: Kendal/Hunt: 1985. pp. 231–242. 0-8403-33-32-3. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lydy M, Belden JB, Wheelock C, Hammock B, Denton D. Challenges in regulating pesticide mixtures. Ecol Soc. 2004;9:1. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moser VC, Simmons JE, Gennings C. Neurotoxicological interactions of a five-pesticide mixture in preweanling rats. Toxicol Sci. 2006;92:235–245. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Richardson JR, Chambers HW, Chambers JE. Analysis of the additivity of in vitro inhibition of cholinesterase by mixtures of chlorpyrifos-oxon and azinphos-methyl-oxon. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;172:128–139. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schuler LJ, Trimble AJ, Belden JB. Lydy MJ. Joint toxicity of triazine herbicides and organophosphate insecticides to the midge Chironomus tentans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005;49:173–177. doi: 10.1007/s00244-004-0224-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.OECD. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1996. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals’ Proposal Guideline 305, Bioconcentration: Flow-Through Fish Test. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Effects RaF, editor. Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 8703800. EPA EPA (1998) OPPTS (Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances) [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nahla SE, Rasha AA, Fawzia E. Prophylactic effect of vitamin E against hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hematological indices and hstopathology induced by diazinon insecticide in mice. Current Zoology. 2009;55:219–226. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reitman S, Frankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1957;28:56–63. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/28.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szasz G. A kinetic photometric method for serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. Clin Chem. 1969;15:124–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Feather-Stone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961;7:88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Doumas BT, Watson WA, Biggs HG. Quantitative colorimetric determination of albumin in serum or plasma. Clin Chem Acta. 1971;31:87–91. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(71)90365-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fawcett JK, Soctt JE. Determination of urea (urease modified Berthelot reaction) J Clin Path. 1960;13:156–159. doi: 10.1136/jcp.13.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schirmeister J, Willmann H, Kiefer H. [Plasma Creatinine as Rough Indicator of Renal Function] . Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1964;89 doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1111251. 10-18-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Henry RJ. In: Clinical Chemistry. Row H, editor. New York: 1974. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Darham B, Trinder P. An improved color reagent for determination of blood glucose by the oxidase system. Analyst. 1972;97:142–145. doi: 10.1039/an9729700142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Britton KE, Quinn V, Brown BL, Ekins RP. A strategy for thyroid function tests. Br Med J. 1975;3:350–352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5979.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95:351–358. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hu ML, Dillard CJ. Plasma SH and GSH measurement. Method of enzymology. 1994;233:385–387. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:7130–7139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Misra FP, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase determination. J Biochem. 1972;25:192–205. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hong J, Kima HY, Kim DG, Seo J, Kimb KJ. Rapid determination of chlorinated pesticides in fish by freezing-lipid filtration, solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1038:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nardelli V, Palermo C, Centonze D. Rapid multiresidue extraction method of organochlorinated pesticides from fish feed. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1034:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Criado DM, Fernandez IH, Pereiro R, Torrijos RC. Application of matrix solid-phase dispersion to the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in fat by gas chromatography with electron-capture and mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1056:187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gad SC. Statistics and experiment design for toxicologist. New York, USA: CRC Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gad SC. Statistics for toxicologist. In: Hayes WA, editor. Principles and methods of toxicology. 4th edition. USA: Taylor & Francis; 2001. pp. 285–364. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mansour SA, Refaie AA. Xenobiotics interaction. 2. An Approach to the use of biochemical data measurements for interpreting interaction of insecticide mixtures in rat. Ad Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;1:1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Christine MC, Niti N Patel, Ruy , Tchao R, Peter JH. Role of biotransformation in 3-(3, dichlorophenyl)-2,4- thiazolidinedione-induced hepatotoxicity in Fischer 344 rats. Toxicology. 2008;250:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Taybe W, Amel N, Issam C, Imed I, Abdelhedi M, Mohamed H. Subacute effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic herbicide on antioxidant defense system and lipid peroxidation in rat erythrocytes. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2011;99:256–264. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lehtinen KJ, Tana J. Review of endocrine disrupting natural compounds and endocrine effects of pulp and paper mill and municipal sewage effluents. Finish Environment institute. 2001 [Google Scholar]
- 45.Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette LJ Jr, Jégou B, Jensen TK, Jouannet P, Keiding N, Leffers H, McLachlan JA, Meyer O, Müller J, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Scheike T, Sharpe R, Sumpter J, Skakkebaek NE. Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104(Suppl 4):741–803. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s4741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wolf DC, Allen JW, George MH, Hester SD, Sun G, Moore T, Thai SF, Delker D, Winkfield E, Leavitt S, Nelson G, Roop BC, Jones C, Thibodeaux J, Nesnow S. Toxicity profiles in rats treated with tumorigenic and nontumorigenic triazole conazole fungicides: Propiconazole, triadimefon, and myclobutanil. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34:895–902. doi: 10.1080/01926230601047808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hester SD, Nesnow S. Transcriptional responses in thyroid tissues from rats treated with a tumorigenic and a non-tumorigenic triazole conazole fungicide. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;227:357–369. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gray LE Jr, Kavlock RJ. The effects of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether (NIT) on serum thyroid hormones in adult female mice. Toxicol Lett. 1983;15:231–235. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(83)90221-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bukowska B, Chajdys A, Duda W, Duchnowicz P. Catalase activity in human erythrocytes: effect of phenoxyherbicides and their metabolites. Cell Biol Int. 2000;24:705–711. doi: 10.1006/cbir.2000.0553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Palmeira CM, Moreno AJ, Madeira VM. Interactions of herbicides 2,4-D and dinoseb with liver mitochondrial bioenergetics. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994;127:50–57. doi: 10.1006/taap.1994.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Romero-Puertas MC, Mccarthy IM, Gomez LM, Sandalio FJ, Corpas LA, Del Rio JM. Palama, Reactive oxygen species-mediated enzymatic systemsinvolved in the oxidative action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27:1135–1148. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ahmed HO, Said SE, Afaf SO, Ayman KA. Toxicological and Pathological Evaluation of Prolonged Bromuconazole Fungicide Exposure in Male Rats. Med J Cairo Univ. 2011;79:555–564. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shchepetkin IA, Cherdyntseva NV, Kagiia VT. [Effect of sanazole and metrinidazole on production of reactive oxygen species by macrophages] . Antibiot Khimioter. 2003;48:7–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bruno M, Moore T, Nesnow S, Ge Y. Protein carbonyl formation in response to propiconazole-induced oxidative stress. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:2070–2078. doi: 10.1021/pr801061r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krishnan K, Clewell HJ 3rd, Andersen ME. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses of simple mixtures. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(Suppl 9):151–155. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s9151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mansour SA, Refaie AA, Nada SA Xenobiotics interaction. 4-effect of some pesticides and their mixtures on the growth rate of albino rats. Adv Pharmacol Tocicol. 2001;2:9–24. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Poet TS, Wu H, Kousba AA, Timchalk C. In vitro rat hepatic and intestinal metabolism of the organophosphate pesticides chlorpyrifos and diazinon. Toxicol Sci. 2003;72:193–200. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Syngenta CPI. Material Safety Data Sheet. 2009 Greensboro, NC 27419. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tomlin CDS. 2004. The Pesticide Manual; p. 769. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bayer C. Frankfurt, Germany: 2003. Plant Protection Product: Illoxan; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]