Abstract
We report the 4.25-Mbp first draft sequence of Gammaproteobacteria strain MFB021, a moderate halophile isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil in Cochin, India. The genome of the strain MFB021 was sequenced to understand the mechanism of hydrocarbon degradation and the halophilicity of the bacterium.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The class Gammaproteobacteria constitutes a very large and diverse group of bacteria that exhibits enormous variety in terms of their phenotype and metabolic capabilities (1, 2). Strain MFB021, identified as belonging to Gammaproteobacteria, was isolated from a soil sample contaminated with petroleum and other hydrocarbons in Cochin, India. Bushnell Haas (BH) broth medium supplemented with diesel oil was used for the isolation of strain MFB021. The organism is able to degrade petroleum products, can grow in up to 25% salinity, and can tolerate salinity levels of up to 30%. The genome of the Gammaproteobacteria strain MFB021 was sequenced to gain understanding into the mechanisms involved in osmotolerance and petroleum degradation capability.
Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform with a 2 × 250 paired-end run; 522,255 paired sequences were generated, for a total of >193 Mb and a mean length of 185 bases per read. The reads were analyzed and quality checked using FastQC (3). De novo assembly was performed using ABySS version 1.3.7 (4). We used SSPACE version 2.0 (5) to extend and merge the resulting scaffolds based on read-pair information, as well as short overlaps to reduce the number of scaffolds, which resulted in 136 contigs and an average coverage of 43×, for a total of 4,436,200 bp. Genome annotation was automatically performed on the RAST server (6), Glimmer 3 (7, 8), GeneMark (9), the KEGG database (10), tRNAscan-SE (11), RNAmmer (12), and Signal P4.1 (13), using Glimmer for base calling, obtaining 3,324 protein-coding genes.
Among the coding sequences (CDSs), 1,332 are not in a subsystem, whereas 1,992 CDSs (1,898 nonhypothetical and 94 hypothetical) are in subsystems. RAST annotation also predicted the involvement of 162 genes in stress responses, including 30 genes involved in osmotic stress (2 in osmoregulation; 21 in choline, betaine uptake, and betaine biosynthesis; 3 in the synthesis of osmoregulated periplasmic glucans; and 4 in ectoine biosynthesis and regulation), 75 in oxidative stress (12 in glutathione:nonredox reactions, 6 in redox-dependent regulation, 6 in the glutathione:redox cycle, 6 in glutaredoxin, 24 in oxidative stress, and 2 in glutaredoxins), 8 in protection from reactive oxygen species (ROS), 3 in cold shock, 15 in heat shock, and 29 in detoxification. Also, 44 genes are involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds (3 in salicylate ester degradation, 4 in benzoate degradation, 4 in the chloroaromatic degradation pathway, 11 in the catechol branch of the beta-ketoadipate pathway, 5 in salicylate and gentisate catabolism, and 13 in the protocatechuate branch of the beta-ketoadipate pathway). The organism also has 6 genes involved in the synthesis of the plant hormone auxin.
This data set provides insight into the features of this bacteria that may contribute to petroleum utilizing ability and its survival and growth under halophilic conditions.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. JNVT00000000. The version described in this paper is version JNVT01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work was supported by the grants from the National Agricultural Innovation Project, India.
Footnotes
Citation Joseph TC, Baby A, Reghunathan D, Varghese AM, Murugadas V, Lalitha KV. 2014. Draft genome sequence of the halophilic and highly halotolerant Gammaproteobacteria strain MFB021. Genome Announc. 2(6):e01156-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01156-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Woese CR, Weisburg WG, Hahn CM, Paster BJ, Zablen LB, Lewis BJ, Macke TJ, Ludwig W, Stackebrandt E. 1985. The phylogeny of purple bacteria: the gamma subdivision. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 6:25–33. 10.1016/S0723-2020(85)80007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kersters K, Devos P, Gillis M, Swings J, Vandamme P, Stackebrandt E. 2006. Introduction to the Proteobacteria. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E. (ed), The Prokaryotes: A handbook on the biology of Bacteria. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Andrews S. 2010. FASTQC package. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
- 4. Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: A parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19:1117–1123. 10.1101/gr.089532.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding preassembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. 1998. Microbial gene identificationusing interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:544–548. 10.1093/nar/26.2.544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a selftraining method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2607–2618. 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions forgene finding. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1107–1115. 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:277–280. 10.1093/nar/gkh063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964. 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108. 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
