Abstract
Background
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules that inhibit gene expression at post-transcriptional level. Gadd45g (growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 gamma) is a stress-response protein, which has been implicated in several biological processes, including DNA repair, the cell cycle and cell differentiation.
Results
In this work, we found that miR-383 is a negative regulator of Gadd45g. Forced expression of miR-383 decreased the expression of Gadd45g through binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR), whereas inhibition of miR-383 increased Gadd45g expression. The presence of miR-383 increased the cellular sensitivity to DNA damage in breast cancer cells, which was rescued by ectopic expression of Gadd45g without the 3′-UTR. miR-383 also regulates the expression of Gadd45g in embryonic stem (ES) cells, but not their apoptosis under genotoxic stress. miR-383 was further showed to negatively regulate ES cell differentiation via targeting Gadd45g, which subsequently modulates the pluripotency-associated genes. Taken together, our study demonstrates that miR-383 is a negative regulator of Gadd45g in both tumor cells and ES cells, however, has distinct function in regulating cell apoptosis. miR-383 may be used as antineoplastic agents in cancer chemotherapy.
Conclusion
We demonstrate for the first time that miR-383 can specifically regulates the expression of Gadd45g by directly targeting to the 3-UTR region of Gadd45g mRNA, a regulatory process conserved in human tumor cells and mouse embryonic stem cells. These two compotents can be potentially used as antineoplastic agents in cancer chemotherapy.
Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules that inhibit gene expression at post-transcriptional level [1]. In the cell nucleus, miRNAs are transcribed and cleaved by Drosha and DGCR8 to form precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) [2],[3]. Pre-miRNAs are further exported to the cytoplasm by exportin 5 (XPO5) [4]. In the cytoplasm, pre-miRNAs are processed by Dicer and TAR RNA-binding protein 2 (TARBP2) to produce mature miRNAs (∼22nts), which are finally loaded in the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) [5]. The miRNA-RISC results in mRNA cleavage or translation repression, through which miRNAs play key roles in various biological processes [6],[7]. It has been reported that the translation of more than 60% of the protein-coding genes are mediated by miRNAs [5]. Defects in miRNAs are known to be a factor in many diseases [8],[9].
Under genotoxic stress such as UV irradiation, DNA is continuously undergoing damage, which in turn elicits cellular responses, including activation of the DNA repair pathway, cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death [10]. Multiple miRNAs have been found to be involved in regulating the sensitivity to genotoxic stress. miR-24 was found to increase the sensitivity to genotoxic drugs in differentiated blood cells by down-regulating H2AX [11]. miR-421 induces cells to become hypersensitive to ionizing radiation, which is dependent on ATM [12]. Ectopic expression of miR-214 confers resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer cells by targeting PTEN [13]. miR-504 reduces etoposide-caused apoptosis by targeting p53 [14].
Recently, emerging evidence has shown that miRNAs also participate in controlling the fate of embryonic stem cells (ES cells). For example, ES cells lacking Dicer or DGCR8 exhibit defects in differentiation and proliferation [15],[16]. Transcriptional factors such as Sox2, Oct4 and Nanog are important pluripotency genes and play essential roles in self-renewal of ES cells [17]. These genes have been shown to be silenced by various miRNAs, such as miR-134, miR-145, miR-296 and miR-470 [18]. Thus, understanding the roles of miRNAs in ES cells would help elucidate the regulatory network involved in ES cell self-renewal and differentiation.
Gadd45g is a member of Gadd45 family that contains the additional two members, Gadd45a and Gadd45b. They are closely associated with cell growth, DNA repair, cell cycle and apoptosis [19]. These three proteins share approximately 60% identity at the amino acid level and exert their functions through interacting with additional proteins, such as PCNA, p21, cdc2/cyclinB1 and MTK1/MEKK4 [20]–[23]. Gadd45a or Gadd45b deficient mouse hematopoietic cells are more sensitive to UV-induced damage [24],[25]. Gadd45g has been reported to be up-regulated after UV irradiation in both normal and tumor cells [26],[27]. In addition, Gadd45 genes are also reported to be involved in the processes of embryonic development and differentiation in several species [28]–[31]. Recently, Gadd45g was implicated in male sex determination by regulating Sry expression [32],[33]. However, little is known about whether miRNAs participate in responding to stress stimulation or cell differentiation through the Gadd45 genes.
In this study, we found that Gadd45g is a direct target of miR-383, and miR-383 is able to increase the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to both UV irradiation and cisplatin treatment. Notably, miR-383 regulates the expression of Gadd45g in ES cells, but not their apoptosis. These findings provide new insights into the mechanism of miRNAs in the regulation of cellular sensitivity to genotoxic drug treatments in breast cancer cells. Moreover, miR-383 is suggested to function as a negative regulator of embryonic stem cell differentiation via down-regulation of Gadd45g expression.
Results
miR-383 down-regulates Gadd45g by directly targeting the 3′-UTR of Gadd45g
Given the important roles of Gadd45 in DNA damage repair and cell growth/differentiation, we were interested in examining the upstream regulators of Gadd45g, such as miRNAs. We therefore used three computer-aided algorithms (TargetScan, miRBase and Picta) to search for potential miRNA-binding sites in Gadd45g mRNA. One miRNA, miR-383, was found to target Gadd45g using the three algorithms, and the putative binding site of miR-383 in the 3′-UTR of Gadd45g is highly conserved in different species (human, mouse, rat, rhesus monkey and horse) (Fig. 1A). This suggests that miR-383 is a possible regulator of Gadd45g.
We next used a luciferase reporter assay to validate the binding of miR-383 to the 3′-UTR of Gadd45g. The wild-type Gadd45g-3′-UTR or mutant Gadd45g-3′-UTR were cloned into the pMIR-REPORT luciferase vector downstream from its Firefly luciferase gene (Fig. 1B). The wild-type or mutant pMIR-Gadd45g-3′-UTR reporter was co-transfected with a control or a miR-383 mimic plasmid, and a pRL-SV40 vector containing the Renilla luciferase gene was also co-transfected as a normalization control. The activity of the Firefly luciferase construct containing wild-type 3′-UTR of Gadd45g was suppressed by ectopic expression of miR-383 as compared with control (Fig. 1C). However, this suppression was abolished when the 3′-UTR of Gadd45g was mutated (Fig. 1C). Anti-miR-383 was also used to co-transfected with luciferase construct containing wild-type 3′-UTR of Gadd45g, and the luciferase activity was increased by anti-miR-383 as compared with control (Fig. 1D).
To investigate the regulation of Gadd45g by miR-383 in vivo, we examined the protein level of Gadd45g under a condition of overexpression of miR-383 mimic or anti-miR-383. As shown in Fig. 1E, the endogenous protein levels of Gadd45g were reduced by ectopic expression of miR-383 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Additionally, transfection of MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells with anti-miR-383 increased the Gadd45g protein levels (Fig. 1E). We further observed that endogenous Gadd45g mRNA was also down-regulated by miR-383 mimic in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1F). Taken together, these data indicate that Gadd45g is a direct target of miR-383.
Gadd45g and miR-383 are negatively correlated in response to UV irradiation
It has been well known that UV irradiation induces an increased expression of Gadd45g in a variety of cell lines [26],[27]. In order to determine the regulatory relationship between miR-383 and Gadd45g, we examined the expression levels of Gadd45g and miR-383 post UV irradiation. MCF-7 cells were treated with different doses of UV ranging from 20 to 60 J/m2 or monitored for up to 24 h after irradiation at 60 J/m2. Induction of apoptosis was confirmed by the appearance of condensed chromatin or apoptotic bodies after irradiation in both a time- (Fig. S1A) and dose- (Fig. S1B) dependent manner. After UV irradiation at 60 J/m2, the mRNA and protein levels of Gadd45g were elevated in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). In addition, when MCF-7 cells were irradiated by UV at different doses, the Gadd45g expression also exhibited an elevation following the increased UV dose (Fig. 2B). We next examined the expression levels of miR-383 in MCF-7 cells before and after UV irradiation by qRT-PCR. The levels of endogenous miR-383 were reduced in a time and dose dependent manner in response to UV irradiation (Fig. 2C and D). As shown in Fig. 2E and F, statistical analysis showed that Gadd45g mRNA expression levels are inversely correlated with miR-383 (r = −0.7583, r = −0.65197, P<0.05). These results therefore support a role for miR-383 in controlling Gadd45g expression during the cellular response to UV irradiation, and the down-regulation of miR-383 may be involved in UV-induced apoptosis.
miR-383 regulates the cellular apoptotic sensitivity to UV or cisplatin
To investigate the role of miR-383 in regulating cellular sensitivity to multiple stresses, we examined the effects of miR-383 on the cellular responses to UV irradiation and cisplatin, a widely used chemotherapy drug in cancer patients. After transfection with miR-383 mimic or control, MCF-7 cells were irradiated with UV (60 J/m2). At 12 hours after UV irradiation, morphologic examination performed under light microscopy indicated that there were more cells displaying apoptosis in miR-383 transfected cells than control cells (Fig. S2A). Cisplatin is a cytotoxic agent that induces apoptosis through DNA cross-linking. The effect of miR-383 on the response to cisplatin in MCF-7 cells was also examined, and we found that miR-383 overexpressing cells exhibited a more severe cell death than control cells upon cisplatin treatment (Fig. S2A). We also observed similar results in another breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231. The miR-383 mimic transfected MDA-MB-231 cells exhibited an increased sensitivity to UV irradiation and cisplatin compared with control cells as well (Fig. S2B).
MTT assay was also used to assess cell viability, and we found that the viability of miR-383 mimic transfected MCF-7 cells decreased more significantly than control cells after UV irradiation or cisplatin treatment (Fig. 3A). The effect of miR-383 on cell viability was further confirmed in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with UV irradiation or cisplatin. miR-383 enhanced the cytotoxicity caused by both types of genotoxic stress in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S3A).
To confirm the decreased cell viability induced by miR-383 was due to apoptosis, Annexin V/PI assays were performed 12 h following UV irradiation or 24 h following cisplatin treatment. As shown in Fig. 3B, nearly two folds of MCF-7 cells show positive staining with Annexin V in miR-383 transfected cells than in control cells. Similar results were also obtained in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S3B). These results indicate that miR-383 increases the sensitivity of breast cancer cells in response to UV irradiation and cisplatin treatment, and thus enhances stress-induced apoptosis.
The effect of miR-383 on cell apoptosis caused by genotoxic stress is mediated by Gadd45g
To ascertain the roles of Gadd45g in miR-383 regulated apoptotic sensitivity induced by genotoxic stress, MCF-7 cells were co-transfected with miR-383 construct and a miR-383-insensitive Gadd45g expression plasmid without the 3′-UTR. Fig. 3C shows that Gadd45g expression plasmid rescues the down-regulation of Gadd45g induced by miR-383 (Fig. 3C, upper panel). Apoptosis assay shows that the effect of miR-383 on cell apoptosis induced by UV irradiation was fully rescued by overexpressing Gadd45g lacking the 3′-UTR in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 3C, lower panel). Similarly, the apoptosis after cisplatin treatment is increased in miR-383 mimic transfected cells, but this increase is only happened in the absence of miR-383-resistent Gadd45g plasmid (Fig. 3D). Taken together, these data demonstrate that inhibition of Gadd45g expression is at least partially responsible for the miR-383 enhanced apoptotic sensitivity to genotoxic stress.
Exctopic expression of miR-383 does not affect apoptosis in ES cells
To determine whether the relationship between miR-383 and Gadd45g are conserved in physiological conditions, we employed mouse ES cell as model system. We found that ectopic expression of miR-383 in R1 ES cells also results in the down-regulation of Gadd45g both at the mRNA and protein levels, while anti-miR-383 up-regulates Gadd45g (Fig. 4A and B), suggesting a consistent role of miR-383 in regulation Gadd45g. However, miR-383 overexpression has almost no effect on cell apoptosis after UV irradiation or cisplatin treatment in ES cells (Fig. 4C), suggesting distinct function of miR-383 in the response to DNA damage between ES cells and tumor cells [34].
miR-383 negatively modulates ES cell differentiation through Gadd45g
The expression pattern of miR383 and Gadd45g was further studied during ES cell differentiation. The mouse ES cell line R1 was treated with with Rotinoid Acid (RA) for differentiation, and we found that miR-383 expression was down-regulated in during ES cell differentiation (Fig. 4F). In contrast, Gadd45g was up-regulated at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 4D and 4E). The inversed correlation between Gadd45g and miR-383 was also observed in spontaneous differentiation of embryonic body (EB). Fig. 4G, H and I showed that miR-383 was decreased in parallel with the increase of Gadd45g expression. These results raise a possibility that miR-383 regulates Gadd45g in the process of ES cell differentiation.
To further evaluate the role of miR-383 in ES cell differentiation, we overexpressed miR-383 mimic in ES cells followed by RA treatment for 3 days. An increased expression of Gadd45g and the differentiation markers, Nestin and Isl1 (Fig. 5A), and a decreased expression of the pluripotency markers, Sox2, Nanog, Dppa4 and Gdf3 (Fig. 5B), was observed in control cells during RA induction by qRT-PCR. However, the RA-induced up-regulation of Gadd45g was inhibited by miR-383 in miR-383 overexpressed R1 cells (Fig. 5A). Moreover, following RA treatment, up-regulation of Nestin and Isl1, and down-regulation of Sox2, Nanog, Dppa4 and Gdf3 were blocked by overexpression of miR-383 compared with those in control cells (Fig. 5A and B). Thus, miR-383 has the potential to inhibit ES cell differentiation by regulating these genes. We also compared the expression of other differentiation associated genes, such as Sox17 and Gata5, but miR-383 had no effect on the expression of these genes (Fig. 5A).
Dppa4 and Gdf3 are pluripotency-associated genes that are required for maintaining the undifferentiated state of ES cells [35],[36]. Isl1 is a marker of neuron differentiation, playing a significant role in the development of motor neurons and interneurons [37],[38]. These three genes have been observed to be regulated by Gadd45g in hEC cells [39]. The above results suggest that these genes are likely to be regulated by miR-383-Gadd45g axis. To address the possibility, we next tested the effect of Gadd45g on the expressional levels of the selected pluripotency and differentiation related genes during ES cell differentiation. We depleted Gadd45g expression by RNAi. As shown in Fig. 5C, two Gadd45g siRNAs were evaluated and siRNA-2 was found to be more efficient in decreasing Gadd45g expression and was thus used for following experiments. In RA-induced ES cells, when Gadd45g was knocked down, the increase of Isl1 expression and the decrease of Dppa4 and Gdf3 expression in response to ES cell differentiation were inhibited, which was comparable to the effect of miR-383 overexpression (Fig. 5D). The expression of Sox2, Nanog and Nestin was not changed by Gadd45g RNAi (Fig. 5D). The protein levels of Isl1, Dppa4 and Gdf3 were also examined after Gadd45g depletion or miR-383 overexpression. Both miR-383 overexpression (Fig. 5E) and Gadd45g depletion (Fig. 5F) down-regulated Isl1 protein levels and up-regulated Gdf3 and Dppa4 protein levels. These results support that miR-383 functions as a negative regulator of ES cell differentiation by targeting Gadd45g.
Discussion
UV irradiation of mammalian cells is known to have apoptotic effects and cisplatin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent that activates cellular apoptosis via DNA cross-linking [40]. In cancer treatment, the process of apoptosis plays a critical role in the removal of damaged cells [41]. Therefore, agents that can induce genotoxic and metabolic stress are widely used in clinical cancer therapy. One problem is that tumor cells are commonly capable of developing resistance to these treatments. In order to overcome this, it is necessary to increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to these genotoxic agents. In our studies, we found that the expression of miR-383 is involved in cellular response to genotoxic stress. The expression profiles of miRNAs are altered in response to various events. For example, treatment with ionizing radiation, H2O2, etoposide or UV irradiation can induce an alteration of the miRNA expression profile [42],[43]. The miRNA profiling was carried out in primary human fibroblasts at a low dose of UV irradiation, but miR-383 was found to be unchanged [43]. This may be due to the different cell lines, dosages and time points used [44]. Here, we report that overexpression of miR-383 in breast cancer cells increased the apoptotic sensitivity to UV or cisplatin, indicating that miR-383 regulates cell apoptosis induced by genotoxic stress. Intrerestingly, miR-383 was not involved in the apoptosis of ES cells under the same genotoxic stress. Therefore, miRNAs, including miR-383, are candidate antineoplastic agents based on their capacity to alter the responsiveness to cytotoxic agents [45].
miRNAs regulate gene expression by binding mRNA, thereby resulting in mRNA degradation or protein translation inhibition. In our experiments, we demonstrated that miR-383 binds to the 3′-UTR of Gadd45g so as to down-regulate its expression. Gadd45g, as well as Gadd45a and Gadd45b, respond to environmental stress by mediating activation of the p38/JNK pathway via MTK1/MEKK4 kinase [23]. In our studies, we determined that the expression of Gadd45g was elevated post UV irradiation, which result is inversely correlated with miR-383 expression. This suggests that miR-383 is likely the upstream modulator of Gadd45g in response to environmental stress. Further, when Gadd45g cDNA lacking the 3′-UTR was overexpressed in breast cancer cells, the enhancement of cytotoxic agents-induced apoptosis by miR-383 was rescued indicating that the key target of miR-383 in regulating the sensitivity to genotoxic stress is Gadd45g. A previous report has shown that in testicular embryonic carcinoma cells miR-383 induces a decreased proliferation rate by targeting interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF1) [46], implying that miR-383 exerts effects through various targets.
Moreover, we showed that Gadd45g is also a target of miR-383 in mouse ES cells. Both the mRNA and protein levels of Gadd45g were regulated by miR-383. In addition to affecting cell death and cell cycle, mouse Gadd45g was shown to be up-regulated during embryonic development and highly expressed in neurons [28]–[30]. Gadd45g has also been shown to promote neuronal differentiation in Xenopus and hEC cells. The knockdown of both Gadd45a and Gadd45g in Xenopus decreases neural crest markers and increases multipotency markers [31]. Gadd45g overexpression in hEC cells elevates neuronal markers, while it down-regulates pluripotency associated genes [39],[47]. Additionally, miR-383 has been shown to be down-regulated in mouse testis after birth until 14 days postpartum [46], suggesting that miR-383 may be involved in mouse embryonic development. Consistent with these data, in our experiments, miR-383 is down-regulated during RA-induced ES cell differentiation or ES spontaneous differentiation, coupled with an up-regulation of Gadd45g. Thus, we assume that miR-383 participates in regulating ES cell differentiation through targeting Gadd45g.
We further observed that, in RA-induced differentiating ES cells, an overexpression of miR-383 or depletion of Gadd45g suppressed the expression of Isl1 and increased the expression of Dppa4 and Gdf3. Although the function of Dppa4 and Gdf3 is not as well understood as Nanog, Sox2 and Oct4, most studies suggest their involvement in ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Dppa4 down-regulated ES cells are hard to maintain in the undifferentiated state [48] and Gdf3 is specifically expressed in ES cells [36]. Isl1 is an important gene in development of islets, neurons and cardiac tissue [49]. Our results suggest that miR-383 regulates these ES cell pluripotency or differentiation-associated genes by down-regulating Gadd45g. The expression of Nanog, Sox2 and Nestin, which were also observed to be regulated by miR-383, was unchanged by Gadd45g depletion. As is well known, each microRNA generally has hundreds of direct or indirect targets [6]. Since Nanog, Sox2 and Nestin are not potential targets predicted by the computer-aided algorithms (TargetScan, miRBase and Picta), miR-383 may indirectly regulate these genes through targets other than Gadd45g. We propose that miR-383 functions through multiple targets that synergize so as to regulate ES cell differentiation.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that miR-383 negatively regulates Gadd45g in the process of genotoxic stress-induced apoptotic events and ES cell differentiation. Recently, multiple miRNAs have been reported to be associated with genotoxic agents responsiveness, which suggests that these miRNAs play potential roles in cancer development [44]. Thus, a more detailed understanding about the functions of miRNA and their targets might lead to the development of new drugs for cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and differentiation
Human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 (both these two cell lines come from ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. The mouse embryonic stem cell line R1 was cultivated with mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells in DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 0.1 mM MEM nonessential amino acid (Gibco), 140 µM 2–mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 1000 U/mL leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF, Chemicon) on gelatin-coated plates. ES cells were trypsinized from the plates, suspended in ES medium and then left in the plates for 30 min to remove differentiated cells and feeder cells before they were recultured on a new plate. ES cell differentiation was induced by adding 1 µM retinoic acid (RA, Sigma) in the absence of LIF and without feeder cells. The embryoid body (EB) was formed by means of a hanging drop culture for 2 days and cultured without LIF for the indicated days.
Vector construction and transfection
The human Gadd45g cDNA without the 3′-UTR was amplified from the plasmid pcDNA3.1-Gadd45g which was provided by Professor Qian Tao (The Chinese University of Hong Kong). After PCR amplification, Gadd45g cDNA without the 3′-UTR was cloned into the EcoRI and XhoI sites of a pcDNA3.1 vector. The 3′-UTR of Gadd45g was amplified from MCF-7 genomic DNA and cloned into the SpeI and SacI sites of a pMIR-REPORT luciferase vector. The pMIR-Gadd45g-mut construct was generated by site-specific mutagenesis, as shown in Fig. 1B, using primers containing mutant sites for PCR. MiR-383 mimic and control RNA were synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Anti-miR-383 and anti-control were purchased from Ambion. Sixteen hours before transfection, MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded onto culture plates and transfected with 200 nM of miR-383 mimic or 100 nM of anti-miR-383 using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturers' instructions. For R1 cell transfection, cells were cultured on gelatin-coated 6-well plates without feeder cells, then 200 nM of miR-383 mimic or 100 nM of Gadd45g siRNA were introduced using lipofectamine 2000. After transfection, cells were cultured with LIF or RA for 3 days.
UV irradiation and cisplatin administration
The cells or transfected cells were irradiated with UVC (254 nm) using a UV lamp CL-1000 Ultraviolet Crosslinker (UVP, Upland, CA). Before UV irradiation, the culture media was removed, cells were irradiated at 20–60 J/m2, and fresh media was added to the plates immediately after irradiation. Cells were then cultured at 37°C for various periods. For cisplatin treatment, cells were grown to 80% confluency, and cisplatin (Sigma) was dissolved in DMSO and added to the medium at 25 µM (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) or 10 µM (R1) concentration for 24 h. The DMSO vehicle served as the control.
Cell viability test and apoptosis assay
The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed to analyze cell viability. MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded on 96-well plates at a density of 5×103 per well before transfection. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were treated with UV or cisplatin. After 12 h (UV) or 24 h (cisplatin), 0.5 mg/mL MTT was added to the medium for 4 h. DMSO was added to the plates after the medium was removed, and the OD value at 490 nm was determined by a microplate reader (BIO-RAD). Annexin-V/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (KeyGEN) was used to assess cell apoptosis. Simply, Annexin-V and PI was used to label early and late apoptotic cells, respectively. After staining, cells were analyzed by FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Luciferase assay
MCF-7 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate and transfected with either 100 nM of miR-383 mimic or control, 100 ng of pMIR-Gadd45g 3′-UTR or pMIR-Gadd45g-mut, and 10 ng of pRL vector, using lipofectamine 2000 according to manufacturer's protocol. Alternatively, 100 nM of anti-miR-383 or negative control were cotransfected with 100 ng of pMIR-Gadd45g 3′-UTR supplemented with 10 ng of pRL vector. Transfection of each construct was performed in triplicate. Two days post transfection, luciferase assays were performed using the dual-luciferase reporter system (VIGOROUS, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Firefly luciferase reading was normalized to that of Renilla luciferase.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and R1 cells using TriZol reagent (Invitrogen), and quantified with Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher). For cDNA reverse transcription, 1 ug RNA was converted by using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green Master Mix (CWBIO, Beijing, China) on IQ5 Real-Time Detection System (BIO-RAD), and data was normalized to GAPDH expression. The mature miR-383 and U6 expression levels were detected using a modified stem-loop RT-PCR method [50]. For miR-383 and U6 reverse transcription, the specific miR-383 reverse transcription primer used was: 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACagccac-3′; the specific U6 RT primer is 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′. The real time PCR primer of mature miR-383 (forward: 5′-GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′, reverse: 5′-AGATCAGAAGGTGATTGTGGCT-3′), and U6 (forward: 5′- CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA -3′, reverse: 5′- AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT -3′).
Protein extraction and Western blotting
At 48 h post-transfection, cells were lysed using NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4 and 2 mM PMSF). Cell extracts were subjected to electrophoresis in 12% acrylamide gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore). Antibodies against Gadd45g (Abcam, 1∶500), Nanog (Cell Signaling Technology, 1∶3000) and β-actin (Abmart, 1∶2000) were used. HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Abmart, 1∶5000) were used as secondary antibodies.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test. P–value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Dongdong Lu from Tongji University for reading the article and professor Qian Tao from The Chinese University of Hong Kong for providing pcDNA3.1-Gadd45g.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the 973 program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No.: 2011CB965302, 2013CB967600, 2014CB964603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 31330043, 31201051, 31271534, 91319306, 81400152). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T (2001) Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science 294:853–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Han J, Lee Y, Yeom KH, Nam JW, Heo I, et al. (2006) Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell 125:887–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Han J, Lee Y, Yeom KH, Kim YK, Jin H, et al. (2004) The Drosha-DGCR8 complex in primary microRNA processing. Genes Dev 18:3016–3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lund E, Guttinger S, Calado A, Dahlberg JE, Kutay U (2004) Nuclear export of microRNA precursors. Science 303:95–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Esteller M (2011) Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12:861–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136:215–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wan G, Mathur R, Hu X, Zhang X, Lu X (2011) miRNA response to DNA damage. Trends Biochem Sci 36:478–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hammond SM (2007) MicroRNAs as tumor suppressors. Nat Genet 39:582–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kloosterman WP, Plasterk RH (2006) The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell 11:441–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lieberman HB (2008) DNA damage repair and response proteins as targets for cancer therapy. Curr Med Chem 15:360–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lal A, Pan Y, Navarro F, Dykxhoorn DM, Moreau L, et al. (2009) miR-24-mediated downregulation of H2AX suppresses DNA repair in terminally differentiated blood cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:492–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hu H, Du L, Nagabayashi G, Seeger RC, Gatti RA (2010) ATM is down-regulated by N-Myc-regulated microRNA-421. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1506–1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yang H, Kong W, He L, Zhao JJ, O'Donnell JD, et al. (2008) MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN. Cancer Res 68:425–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hu W, Chan CS, Wu R, Zhang C, Sun Y, et al. (2010) Negative regulation of tumor suppressor p53 by microRNA miR-504. Mol Cell 38:689–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Murchison EP, Partridge JF, Tam OH, Cheloufi S, Hannon GJ (2005) Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12135–12140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wang Y, Medvid R, Melton C, Jaenisch R, Blelloch R (2007) DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat Genet 39:380–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Boiani M, Scholer HR (2005) Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:872–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Subramanyam D, Blelloch R (2011) From microRNAs to targets: pathway discovery in cell fate transitions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21:498–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhang W, Bae I, Krishnaraju K, Azam N, Fan W, et al. (1999) CR6: A third member in the MyD118 and Gadd45 gene family which functions in negative growth control. Oncogene 18:4899–4907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Smith ML, Chen IT, Zhan Q, Bae I, Chen CY, et al. (1994) Interaction of the p53-regulated protein Gadd45 with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Science 266:1376–1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yang Q, Manicone A, Coursen JD, Linke SP, Nagashima M, et al. (2000) Identification of a functional domain in a GADD45-mediated G2/M checkpoint. J Biol Chem 275:36892–36898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhan Q, Antinore MJ, Wang XW, Carrier F, Smith ML, et al. (1999) Association with Cdc2 and inhibition of Cdc2/Cyclin B1 kinase activity by the p53-regulated protein Gadd45. Oncogene 18:2892–2900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mita H, Tsutsui J, Takekawa M, Witten EA, Saito H (2002) Regulation of MTK1/MEKK4 kinase activity by its N-terminal autoinhibitory domain and GADD45 binding. Mol Cell Biol 22:4544–4555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gupta M, Gupta SK, Hoffman B, Liebermann DA (2006) Gadd45a and Gadd45b protect hematopoietic cells from UV-induced apoptosis via distinct signaling pathways, including p38 activation and JNK inhibition. J Biol Chem 281:17552–17558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Liebermann DA, Hoffman B (2007) Gadd45 in the response of hematopoietic cells to genotoxic stress. Blood Cells Mol Dis 39:329–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Vairapandi M, Balliet AG, Hoffman B, Liebermann DA (2002) GADD45b and GADD45g are cdc2/cyclinB1 kinase inhibitors with a role in S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints induced by genotoxic stress. J Cell Physiol 192:327–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ying J, Srivastava G, Hsieh WS, Gao Z, Murray P, et al. (2005) The stress-responsive gene GADD45G is a functional tumor suppressor, with its response to environmental stresses frequently disrupted epigenetically in multiple tumors. Clin Cancer Res 11:6442–6449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kaufmann LT, Gierl MS, Niehrs C (2011) Gadd45a, Gadd45b and Gadd45g expression during mouse embryonic development. Gene Expr Patterns 11:465–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. de la Calle-Mustienes E, Glavic A, Modolell J, Gomez-Skarmeta JL (2002) Xiro homeoproteins coordinate cell cycle exit and primary neuron formation by upregulating neuronal-fate repressors and downregulating the cell-cycle inhibitor XGadd45-gamma. Mech Dev 119:69–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Candal E, Thermes V, Joly JS, Bourrat F (2004) Medaka as a model system for the characterisation of cell cycle regulators: a functional analysis of Ol-Gadd45gamma during early embryogenesis. Mech Dev 121:945–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kaufmann LT, Niehrs C (2011) Gadd45a and Gadd45g regulate neural development and exit from pluripotency in Xenopus. Mech Dev 128:401–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Warr N, Carre GA, Siggers P, Faleato JV, Brixey R, et al. (2012) Gadd45gamma and Map3k4 interactions regulate mouse testis determination via p38 MAPK-mediated control of Sry expression. Dev Cell 23:1020–1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gierl MS, Gruhn WH, von Seggern A, Maltry N, Niehrs C (2012) GADD45G functions in male sex determination by promoting p38 signaling and Sry expression. Dev Cell 23:1032–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dormoy-Raclet V, Markovits J, Malato Y, Huet S, Lagarde P, et al. (2007) Unr, a cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein with cold-shock domains, is involved in control of apoptosis in ES and HuH7 cells. Oncogene 26:2595–2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Masaki H, Nishida T, Kitajima S, Asahina K, Teraoka H (2007) Developmental pluripotency-associated 4 (DPPA4) localized in active chromatin inhibits mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation into a primitive ectoderm lineage. J Biol Chem 282:33034–33042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Clark AT, Rodriguez RT, Bodnar MS, Abeyta MJ, Cedars MI, et al. (2004) Human STELLAR, NANOG, and GDF3 genes are expressed in pluripotent cells and map to chromosome 12p13, a hotspot for teratocarcinoma. Stem Cells 22:169–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ericson J, Thor S, Edlund T, Jessell TM, Yamada T (1992) Early stages of motor neuron differentiation revealed by expression of homeobox gene Islet-1. Science 256:1555–1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pfaff SL, Mendelsohn M, Stewart CL, Edlund T, Jessell TM (1996) Requirement for LIM homeobox gene Isl1 in motor neuron generation reveals a motor neuron-dependent step in interneuron differentiation. Cell 84:309–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jung M, Peterson H, Chavez L, Kahlem P, Lehrach H, et al. (2010) A data integration approach to mapping OCT4 gene regulatory networks operative in embryonic stem cells and embryonal carcinoma cells. PLoS One 5:e10709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cardinal J, Pan P, Dhupar R, Ross M, Nakao A, et al. (2009) Cisplatin prevents high mobility group box 1 release and is protective in a murine model of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Hepatology 50:565–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hengartner MO (2000) The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature 407:770–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Simone NL, Soule BP, Ly D, Saleh AD, Savage JE, et al. (2009) Ionizing radiation-induced oxidative stress alters miRNA expression. PLoS One 4:e6377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Pothof J, Verkaik NS, van IW, Wiemer EA, Ta VT, et al. (2009) MicroRNA-mediated gene silencing modulates the UV-induced DNA-damage response. EMBO J 28:2090–2099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Wouters MD, van Gent, DC, Hoeijmakers JH, Pothof J (2011) MicroRNAs, the DNA damage response and cancer. Mutat Res 717:54–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Croce CM (2009) Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 10:704–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lian J, Tian H, Liu L, Zhang XS, Li WQ, et al. (2010) Downregulation of microRNA-383 is associated with male infertility and promotes testicular embryonal carcinoma cell proliferation by targeting IRF1. Cell Death Dis 1:e94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Huang HS, Kubish GM, Redmond TM, Turner DL, Thompson RC, et al. (2010) Direct transcriptional induction of Gadd45gamma by Ascl1 during neuronal differentiation. Mol Cell Neurosci 44:282–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ivanova N, Dobrin R, Lu R, Kotenko I, Levorse J, et al. (2006) Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442:533–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Li H, Heilbronn LK, Hu D, Poynten AM, Blackburn MA, et al. (2008) Islet-1: a potentially important role for an islet cell gene in visceral fat. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16:356–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou Z, Lee DH, et al. (2005) Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.