Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of core stability exercise (CSE) on the physical and psychological functions of elderly women while negotiating general obstacles. [Subjects and Methods] After allocating 10 elderly women each to the core stability training group and the control group, we carried out Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) and measured crossing velocity (CV), maximum vertical heel clearance (MVHC), and knee flexion angle for assessing physical performances. We evaluated depression and fear of falling for assessing psychological functions. [Results] Relative to the control group, the core stability training group showed statistically significant overall changes after the training session: an increase in POMA scores, faster CV, lower MVHC, and a decrease in knee flexion angle. Furthermore, depression and fear of falling decreased significantly. [Conclusion] CSE can have a positive effect on the improvement of physical and psychological performances of older women who are vulnerable to falls as they negotiate everyday obstacles.
Key words: Core stabilization exercises, Elderly women, Falls
INTRODUCTION
Falls are one of the leading injury-related accidents involving older adults whose muscular strength, proprioceptive sense, and bodily coordination are compromised with aging1). The elderly lack obstacle negotiation capacity and are prone to trip over commonly encountered environmental barriers such as door sills, pavement blocks, and safety bumps2). In a local community, 33% of elderly people were reported to experience falls, of which 42.4% suffered falls3).
Individuals with a history of falls have fears of repeated falls, depression, and anxiety, all of which lead to decreased physical activities4). These negative experiences result in reduced physical capacity in terms of muscular strength, bodily flexibility, and coordination, rendering the affected elderly even more susceptible to falls in a vicious cycle5). Notably, elderly women are more at risk of secondary injury such as severe fractures after falling than elderly men because of their low bone density after menopause6).
Interventions for fall prevention include exercise, education, environmental improvements, and medication7,8,9), of which exercise has been used in fall prevention programs in many ways, as it takes less time and money to implement and programs are easy to set up.
Carter et al.10) reported in a bibliographical study on exercise intervention that exercise improved leg strength 44.4% and balance ability 37.5% in older adults and that as weakness of muscle strength in the trunk was more important than that in the lower extremities, strengthening of lumbar function can improve functional stability, leading to increased balance ability, gait ability, and prevention of falling11, 12).
Core stabilization exercise (CSE) can improve balance control ability by reinforcing intersegmental muscles in the multifidus, transversus abdominis, and rotators13) and physicopsychological functions in a harmonious way by stimulating proprioception powerfully when it is accompanied by Swiss ball exercises, improving balance sense, and maintenance ability14). Previous studies on falling in elderly adults involving CSE have been limited to balance ability or gait ability15, 16), and there have been only a few studies on obstacles as an environmental factor or psychological factors.
Therefore, this study evaluated changes in the physicopsychological functions of elderly women with a fear of falling in negotiating obstacles such as a doorstep (5.2 cm) of a bathroom, where falling occurs frequently, through a Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) in order to understand whether CSE is valid as an efficient exercise to prevent and control falling in consideration of the physicopsychological functions of elderly women.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The subjects of the study were 20 elderly women above the age of 65 who were able to walk independently, did not have experience participating in regular balance training more than twice a week within the past 6 months, had a score higher than 24 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination-Korea (MMSE-K), had no limits on exercise performance due to visual or musculoskeletal disorders and no previous experience of falling, and scored lower than 19 on the Tinetti POMA17). The purpose and methods of this study were explained to all the participants, who read and signed an informed consent from that revealed all the details of the study protocol, which were approved by the ethics committee of Kangwon National University (No. 2013-11-001-002).
The subjects selected were divided into an experimental group and a control group by drawing lots, and the average age, height, and weight in the experimental group were 73.20±3.46 years, 152.15±4.29 cm, and 57.78±7.95 kg, while those in the control group were 71.00±3.50 years, 149.83±6.45 cm, and 53.80±11.04 kg. There were no significant differences among the groups with regard to age, height, or weight (p>0.05).
The core stabilization exercise program proposed by Jeffrey18) and Hesari et al.19) was applied to the experimental group and CSE was composed of three steps. Level 1 consisted of abdominal hollowing in a supine position, abdominal hollowing in a prone position, abdominal hollowing in a quadruped position, abdominal hollowing in a supine position while curling the feet, abdominal hollowing in a prone position while curling the feet, and modified side bridging. Level 2 consisted of bridging with abdominal hollowing, pelvic bridging, the dying bug with abdominal hollowing, and abdominal hollowing while seated on a Swiss Ball. Level 3 consisted of pelvic bridging with a Swiss ball, bird dog exercise, twists on a Swiss ball, and bird dog exercises on a Swiss ball. The experimental group performed a core stabilization program consisting of three levels for 30 min, three times per week on alternate days, for 6 weeks. This program consisted of three levels, and the subjects began at exercise level 1 and proceeded to the next level according to the protocol for the day. Level 1 included static holds in a stable environment, Level 2 included dynamic movements in a stable environment, and Level 3 included dynamic movements in an unstable environment, such as on a Swiss ball, and resisted dynamic movements in an unstable environment.
Before the program and 6 weeks after the program, the Tinetti POMA, crossing velocity (CV), maximum vertical heel clearance (MVHC) and knee flexion angle, which are related to physical functions, were measured, and with respect to psychological functions, depression and fear of falling were measured. The Tinetti POMA is an instrument used to decide the degree of fear of falling and balance and mobility in elderly adults consisting of items scored on a 3-point scale. The maximum score is 28, with 16 points for balance and 12 points for gait. If a subject scores below 19, fear of falling is high, and scores of 19 to 24 indicate an intermediate degree for fear of falling; scores of 25 to 28 indicate no fear of falling. For the crossing velocity (CV), the horizontal distance from the point at which the leading limb leaves the ground to the point at which the heel returns to the ground again is divided by the time taken20). For the maximum vertical heel clearance (MVHC), the vertical distance from the height of the obstacle before obstacle negotiation to the ball of the leading limb was measured21). For the knee flexion angle, the angles were measured at the MVHC22). The obstacle was 60 cm long, 10 cm wide, and 5.2 cm high. The subjects began their gait 5 m from the obstacle and continued on 3 m after obstacle negotiation. Obstacle gait variables were filmed with a camcorder and saved on a computer. CV and MVHC were measured with the use of Dartfish software (Dartfish, Fribourg, Switzerland)23), and the results were output in a data table. To analyze depression, the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale) was used. It is scored on a 4-point scale (0–3), and includes a total of 20 questions. The higher the score, the higher the depression24). For fear of falling, the FOFQ (Fear of Falling Questionnaire) was used. It is scored on a 4-point scale (1–4) and includes a total of 11 questions. The higher the score, the higher the fear of falling25).
For statistical analysis of the results, SPSS 18.0 was used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed as a test of normality. To explain the differences in measurement variables according to the measurement period between exercise groups, a 2-way ANOVA with repeated measure was used, and the level of statistical significance was α=0.05.
RESULTS
Repeated measure ANOVA to analyze changes in the POMA, CV, MVHC, KF, depression, and FOF according to the measurement periods showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the interaction between time and the groups and that the changes in POMA, CV, MVHC, KF, depression, and FOF according to time differed (p<0.001) (Table 1).
Table 1. Changes in physical and psychological function .
Variables | Group | Before | After |
---|---|---|---|
POMA (score) | EG (n=10) | 17.60±1.34 | 19.30±1.57** |
CG (n=10) | 17.80±1.40 | 17.60±1.43 | |
CV (m/sec) | EG (n=10) | 1.56±0.21 | 1.60±0.21* |
CG (n=10) | 1.56±0.10 | 1.55±0.09 | |
MVHC (cm) | EG (n=10) | 7.42±1.38 | 7.02±1.33* |
CG (n=10) | 7.36±1.62 | 7.31±1.74 | |
KF (angle) | EG (n=10) | 111.00±3.16 | 108.60±4.06* |
CG (n=10) | 110.80±3.77 | 110.30±3.16 | |
Depression (score) | EG (n=10) | 27.10±3.67 | 24.50±3.34** |
CG (n=10) | 26.00±2.58 | 25.20±3.00 | |
Fear of falling (score) | EG (n=10) | 22.50±1.43 | 19.80±1.69* |
CG (n=10) | 22.60±3.27 | 21.90±3.54 |
Mean±SD. EG, experimental group; CG, control group; POMA, Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment; CV, crossing velocity; MVHC, maximum vertical heel clearance; KF, knee flexion. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
DISCUSSION
Older adults have low balance and stability due to physiological and functional decreases that occur with ageing26), and to compensate for balance and stability in gait, cadence and stride length decrease27). In the case of obstacle negotiation, when the leading foot encounters obstacles, the center of the body moves forward and fear of falling increases28). In this case, the MVHC, joint angle, and CV are important measures to assess the ability of elderly adults to safely cross obstacles during gait5, 29, 30). Although falling is not always accompanied by physical injury, fear of falling again can be used to predict falling in elderly adults5). Fear of falling leads to a decrease in activity and low self-esteem for independent behavior4) and has direct negative effects that result in decreased balance and gait disorder31, 32).
CSE is training to improve the stability of the trunk by inducing a correcting reaction and an equilibrium reaction through balance training of the flexors and extensors, and as it has been judged to have an effect on physicopsychological functions in obstacle negotiation, a clinical study was conducted.
The results of the present study showed that the Tinetti POMA, CV, MVHC, and knee flexion angle were significantly improved. Esculier et al.33) provided lumbar stability training through a Wii Fit program for Parkinson’s patients for 6 weeks and administered the Tinetti POMA. They reported that the scores significantly increased from 24 points to 28. Chou et al.20) reported that the CV was slow for elderly adults with lower balance ability. Weerdesteyn et al.21) provided balance, gait, and coordination training for elderly adults and reported that foot clearance decreased, which matched with the results of the present study. Park and Lee22) reported that the maximum knee flexion angle of normal adults with lumbar stability was significantly lower in comparison with that of elderly adults with lumbar instability, which partially matched with the results of the present study. The study by Lee et al.34), who reported that a falling prevention program decreased the GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) significantly, was in agreement with the study by Duque et al.35), who reported that fear of falling by elderly adults who experienced falling significantly decreased as a result of balance training using a virtual reality system.
Such results indicate that stability of the trunk was secured, as CSE decreased the sway area of the center of mass. Through harmonious exercise of the limbs based on physical stability, the subjects could negotiate obstacles precisely and easily, had higher self-esteem and had less fear of falling and depression. It is suggested that the 6-week CSE decreased excessive obstacle gait with physical instability in elderly women and improved their physicopsychological functions involving obstacle gait.
REFERENCES
- 1.Blake AJ, Morgan K, Bendall MJ, et al. : Falls by elderly people at home: prevalence and associated factors. Age Ageing, 1988, 17: 365–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen HC, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB, et al. : Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol, 1991, 46: M196–M203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fletcher PC, Berg K, Dalby DM, et al. : Risk factors for falling among community-based seniors. J Patient Saf, 2009, 5: 61–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scheffer AC, Schuurmans MJ, van Dijk N, et al. : Fear of falling: measurement strategy, prevalence, risk factors and consequences among older persons. Age Ageing, 2008, 37: 19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boyd R, Stevens JA: Falls and fear of falling: burden, beliefs and behaviours. Age Ageing, 2009, 38: 423–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jeong GH, Yang SO, Lee KO, et al. : Bone mineral density, health-promoting behaviors, and self-efficacy in middle-aged women. Korean J Women Health Nurs, 2003, 9: 170–178. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu CJ, Latham NK: Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009, 8: CD002759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Petridou ET, Manti EG, Ntinapogias AG, et al. : What works better for community-dwelling older people at risk to fall?: a meta-analysis of multifactorial versus physical exercise-alone interventions. J Aging Health, 2009, 21: 713–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, et al. : Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009, 15: CD007146. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Carter ND, Kannus P, Khan KM: Exercise in the prevention of falls in older people: a systematic literature review examining the rationale and the evidence. Sports Med, 2001, 31: 427–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hicks GE, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, et al. : Trunk muscle composition as a predictor of reduced functional capacity in the health, aging and body composition study: the moderating role of back pain. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2005, 60: 1420–1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Akuthota V, Nadler SF: Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85: S86–S92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jemmett RS: Rehabilitation of lumbar multifidus dysfunction in low back pain: strengthening versus a motor re-education model. Br J Sports Med, 2003, 37: 91–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karatas M, Cetin N, Bayramoglu M, et al. : Trunk muscle strength in relation to balance and functional disability in unihemispheric stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 83: 81–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Vreede PL, Samson MM, van Meeteren NL, et al. : Functional tasks exercise versus resistance exercise to improve daily function in older women: a feasibility study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85: 1952–1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Granacher U, Lacroix A, Muehlbauer T, et al. : Effects of core instability strength training on trunk muscle strength, spinal mobility, dynamic balance and functional mobility in older adults. Gerontology, 2013, 59: 105–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tinetti ME, Ginter SF: Identifying mobility dysfunctions in elderly patients. Standard neuromuscular examination or direct assessment? JAMA, 1988, 259: 1190–1193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jeffreys I: Developing a progressive core stability program. Strength Condit J, 2002, 24: 65–66. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hesari AF, Mahdavi S, Abadi MR, et al. : Comparisons of berg balance scale following core stabilization training in women elderly. Ann Biol Res, 2012, 3: 1499–1504. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Hahn ME, et al. : Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. Gait Posture, 2003, 18: 125–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weerdesteyn V, Nienhuis B, Duysens J: Exercise training can improve spatial characteristics of time-critical obstacle avoidance in elderly people. Hum Mov Sci, 2008, 27: 738–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Park SY, Lee YS: Kinematics of the lower limbs during obstacle crossing performed by young adults and the elderly. J Phys Ther Sci, 2012, 24: 941–944. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Echegoyen S, Aoyama T, Rodríguez C: Zapateado technique as an injury risk in Mexican folkloric and Spanish dance: an analysis of execution, ground reaction force, and muscle strength. Med Probl Perform Art, 2013, 28: 80–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas, 1977, 1: 385–401. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tideiksaar R: Falls in older people: Prevention and management, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Health Professional Press. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Harada N, Chiu V, Damron-Rodriguez J, et al. : Screening for balance and mobility impairment in elderly individuals living in residential care facilities. Phys Ther, 1995, 75: 462–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kang HG, Dingwell JB: Effects of walking speed, strength and range of motion on gait stability in healthy older adults. J Biomech, 2008, 41: 2899–2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cromwell RL, Newton RA, Forrest G: Influence of vision on head stabilization strategies in older adults during walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2002, 57: M442–M448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Begg RK, Sparrow WA: Gait characteristics of young and older individuals negotiating a raised surface: implications for the prevention of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2000, 55: M147–M154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chou LS, Draganich LF: Increasing obstacle height and decreasing toe-obstacle distance affect the joint moments of the stance limb differently when stepping over an obstacle. Gait Posture, 1998, 8: 186–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aggarwal NT, Wilson RS, Beck TL, et al. : Motor dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment and the risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol, 2006, 63: 1763–1769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Delbaere K, Sturnieks DL, Crombez G, et al. : Concern about falls elicits changes in gait parameters in conditions of postural threat in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2009, 64: 237–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Esculier JF, Vaudrin J, Bériault P, et al. : Home-based balance training programme using Wii Fit with balance board for Parkinsons’s disease: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med, 2012, 44: 144–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee HC, Chang KC, Tsauo JY, et al. Fall Prevention Initiatives in Taiwan (FPIT) Investigators: Effects of a multifactorial fall prevention program on fall incidence and physical function in community-dwelling older adults with risk of falls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013, 94: 606–615, e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Duque G, Boersma D, Loza-Diaz G, et al. : Effects of balance training using a virtual-reality system in older fallers. Clin Interv Aging, 2013, 8: 257–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]