Skip to main content
Gland Surgery logoLink to Gland Surgery
. 2014 Nov;3(4):E10–E13. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2014.11.04

Highlights of Gland Surgery 2015: breast surgery

Nancy Q Zhong 1,
PMCID: PMC4244499  PMID: 25493262

The journal Gland Surgery will start as a bimonthly publication from 2015 after more than 2 years’ publication history as a quarterly journal with 11 issues released. As one of the main subjects of Gland Surgery, two special issues related to breast surgery are to be released in 2015 with specific topics on “Advancements and Innovations in Breast Reconstruction” and “Conservative Mastectomies Issue”. Free submissions on these topics are welcomed to be included to the special issues after standard peer-review process and the guest editors’ final review.

Advancements and innovations in breast reconstruction

Dr. Maurice Nahabedian from Georgetown University has been invited to serve as guest editor for the special issue on “Advancements and Innovations in Breast Reconstruction” initiated from late 2014, with renowned experts being involved in this edition (Table 1). The intent of this edition is to provide the readership with up-to-date information on prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction with the goal of improving surgical and aesthetic outcomes. There have been significant advancements in the areas of prosthetic devices, fat grafting, use of acellular dermal matrices, perforator flaps, preoperative and intraoperative imaging as well as oncoplastic surgery that have provided surgeons and patients with more options to achieve ideal aesthetics. Other relevant subjects include the importance of preoperative evaluation as well as radiation therapy and the effects it can have on the final outcome. This special edition will certainly be a “must-read” for all plastic and breast surgeons involved in breast surgery.

Table 1. Special issue on breast reconstruction (Guest Editor: Maurice Nahabedian, MD, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA).

Main authors Affiliation Topic
Maurice Nahabedian Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA Preface
Bert Losken Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia Essential elements of the preoperative breast reconstruction evaluation
Michel St Cyr Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Anatomic and physiologic fundamentals for autologous breast reconstruction
Warren Rozen University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, CTA and MRI for breast reconstruction
Liza Wu University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Abdominal perforator versus muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction
Joseph Dayan Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA Improving outcomes with gluteal and thigh free flaps for breast reconstruction
Maurice Nahabedian Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA Achieving ideal breast aesthetics with autologous breast reconstruction
Maurice Nahabedian Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA Achieving ideal donor site aesthetics with autologous breast reconstruction
Kristina O’Shaughnessy Baptist Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA Update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction
Amy Colwell Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction
Steve Jacobsen Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Current strategies with 2-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction
John Kim Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA The role of outcome studies or decision making with ADM
Hani Sbitany UCSF. San Francisco, CA, USA Oncoplastic breast surgery: current strategies
Allen Gabriel Southwest Washington Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington, DC, USA Fat grafting and breast reconstruction: Tips for ensuring predictability
Ketan Patel University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Lymphatic mapping and lymphedema surgery in the breast cancer patient
Steven Kronowitz MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA Current perspectives on radiation therapy in the setting of autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction

Conservative mastectomies

The term “conservative mastectomies” was originally raised in 2009 by Dr. Maurizio Bruno Nava (Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Italy) and his colleagues (1). Together with Dr. Alberto Rancati from University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, a special issue on the subject is proposed. Promising experts from different centers of many countries are invited to participate in and their precious experiences in various aspects of conservative mastectomies are to be shared in this special edition (Table 2). The aim of this special issue is to have the most comprehensive and thorough edition on conservative mastectomies. Hopefully it will serve as a valuable resource to breast surgery related members.

Table 2. Special issue on conservative mastectomies issue (Guest Editor: Maurizio Bruno Nava, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Italy; Alberto Rancati, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina).

Main authors Affiliation Topic
Alberto Rancati Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Introduction—conservative mastectomies
Maurizio Bruno Nava Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy Conservative mastectomies: an overview
Jennifer E Rusby Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts
Gerald Gui (pending) Breast Unit Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Conservative mastectomies: the rationale behind
Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava University Federico II of Naples, Naples; Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?
Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy Conservative mastectomies and the Oncoplastic Workflow
Eduardo Gonzalez; Alberto Rancati University of Buenos Aires, Argentina Skin-sparing mastectomy
Secondo Folli Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì (FC), Italy NAC-sparing mastectomy
Maurizio Bruno Nava; Alberto Rancati; Giuseppe Catanuto Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Skin reducing mastectomy
Maria Luisa Carcangiu (pending) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy How to evaluate malignant invasion of the nipple areola complex: the role of the pathologist
Scott L Spear (pending) Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: one-stage vs. two-stage approach
Andrea L. Pusic (pending) Cornell University and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after conservative mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes using the BREAST Q
Mitchell Brown University Health Network, Toronto, Canada Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with the use of ADMs
Mahdi Rezai Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf, Germany Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with the use of titanized polipropilene
Christoph Andree Gerresheim Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue: DIEP flap
Claudio Angrigiani; Alberto Rancati Ezequiel Escudero University of Buenos Aires, Argentina Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue: TDAP flap
Peter G. Cordeiro Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes
Charles Malata; John Benson Addenbrooke’s Hospital, UK Oncologic Safety of conservative mastectomies in the Therapeutic Setting
van Verschuer VM Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands The Oncological Equivalence of conservative mastectomies versus Bilateral Total Mastectomy in the Prophylactic Risk Reduction Setting
Virgilio Sacchini Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA Conservative mastectomies for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience
Irene Wapnir Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA Intraoperative imaging of nipple perfusion patterns and ischemic complications in nipple sparing mastectomies
Roberto Orecchia IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy The use of post-operative radiation following NSM
Scott L Spear (pending) Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA Evaluating long-term outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction in the irradiated breast
Shawn T Steen Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, USA Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics

Acknowledgements

Disclosure: The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Nava MB, Catanuto G, Pennati A, et al. Conservative mastectomies. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:681-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gland Surgery are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES