The journal Gland Surgery will start as a bimonthly publication from 2015 after more than 2 years’ publication history as a quarterly journal with 11 issues released. As one of the main subjects of Gland Surgery, two special issues related to breast surgery are to be released in 2015 with specific topics on “Advancements and Innovations in Breast Reconstruction” and “Conservative Mastectomies Issue”. Free submissions on these topics are welcomed to be included to the special issues after standard peer-review process and the guest editors’ final review.
Advancements and innovations in breast reconstruction
Dr. Maurice Nahabedian from Georgetown University has been invited to serve as guest editor for the special issue on “Advancements and Innovations in Breast Reconstruction” initiated from late 2014, with renowned experts being involved in this edition (Table 1). The intent of this edition is to provide the readership with up-to-date information on prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction with the goal of improving surgical and aesthetic outcomes. There have been significant advancements in the areas of prosthetic devices, fat grafting, use of acellular dermal matrices, perforator flaps, preoperative and intraoperative imaging as well as oncoplastic surgery that have provided surgeons and patients with more options to achieve ideal aesthetics. Other relevant subjects include the importance of preoperative evaluation as well as radiation therapy and the effects it can have on the final outcome. This special edition will certainly be a “must-read” for all plastic and breast surgeons involved in breast surgery.
Table 1. Special issue on breast reconstruction (Guest Editor: Maurice Nahabedian, MD, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA).
Main authors | Affiliation | Topic |
---|---|---|
Maurice Nahabedian | Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA | Preface |
Bert Losken | Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia | Essential elements of the preoperative breast reconstruction evaluation |
Michel St Cyr | Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | Anatomic and physiologic fundamentals for autologous breast reconstruction |
Warren Rozen | University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, CTA and MRI for breast reconstruction |
Liza Wu | University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA | Abdominal perforator versus muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction |
Joseph Dayan | Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA | Improving outcomes with gluteal and thigh free flaps for breast reconstruction |
Maurice Nahabedian | Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA | Achieving ideal breast aesthetics with autologous breast reconstruction |
Maurice Nahabedian | Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA | Achieving ideal donor site aesthetics with autologous breast reconstruction |
Kristina O’Shaughnessy | Baptist Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA | Update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction |
Amy Colwell | Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA | Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction |
Steve Jacobsen | Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | Current strategies with 2-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction |
John Kim | Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA | The role of outcome studies or decision making with ADM |
Hani Sbitany | UCSF. San Francisco, CA, USA | Oncoplastic breast surgery: current strategies |
Allen Gabriel | Southwest Washington Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington, DC, USA | Fat grafting and breast reconstruction: Tips for ensuring predictability |
Ketan Patel | University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA | Lymphatic mapping and lymphedema surgery in the breast cancer patient |
Steven Kronowitz | MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA | Current perspectives on radiation therapy in the setting of autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction |
Conservative mastectomies
The term “conservative mastectomies” was originally raised in 2009 by Dr. Maurizio Bruno Nava (Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Italy) and his colleagues (1). Together with Dr. Alberto Rancati from University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, a special issue on the subject is proposed. Promising experts from different centers of many countries are invited to participate in and their precious experiences in various aspects of conservative mastectomies are to be shared in this special edition (Table 2). The aim of this special issue is to have the most comprehensive and thorough edition on conservative mastectomies. Hopefully it will serve as a valuable resource to breast surgery related members.
Table 2. Special issue on conservative mastectomies issue (Guest Editor: Maurizio Bruno Nava, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Italy; Alberto Rancati, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina).
Main authors | Affiliation | Topic |
---|---|---|
Alberto Rancati | Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina | Introduction—conservative mastectomies |
Maurizio Bruno Nava | Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy | Conservative mastectomies: an overview |
Jennifer E Rusby | Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK | Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts |
Gerald Gui (pending) | Breast Unit Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK | Conservative mastectomies: the rationale behind |
Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava | University Federico II of Naples, Naples; Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy | What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies? |
Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava | Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy | Conservative mastectomies and the Oncoplastic Workflow |
Eduardo Gonzalez; Alberto Rancati | University of Buenos Aires, Argentina | Skin-sparing mastectomy |
Secondo Folli | Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì (FC), Italy | NAC-sparing mastectomy |
Maurizio Bruno Nava; Alberto Rancati; Giuseppe Catanuto | Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina | Skin reducing mastectomy |
Maria Luisa Carcangiu (pending) | Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy | How to evaluate malignant invasion of the nipple areola complex: the role of the pathologist |
Scott L Spear (pending) | Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA | Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: one-stage vs. two-stage approach |
Andrea L. Pusic (pending) | Cornell University and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA | Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after conservative mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes using the BREAST Q |
Mitchell Brown | University Health Network, Toronto, Canada | Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with the use of ADMs |
Mahdi Rezai | Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf, Germany | Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with the use of titanized polipropilene |
Christoph Andree | Gerresheim Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany | Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue: DIEP flap |
Claudio Angrigiani; Alberto Rancati | Ezequiel Escudero University of Buenos Aires, Argentina | Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue: TDAP flap |
Peter G. Cordeiro | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA | Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes |
Charles Malata; John Benson | Addenbrooke’s Hospital, UK | Oncologic Safety of conservative mastectomies in the Therapeutic Setting |
van Verschuer VM | Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands | The Oncological Equivalence of conservative mastectomies versus Bilateral Total Mastectomy in the Prophylactic Risk Reduction Setting |
Virgilio Sacchini | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA | Conservative mastectomies for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience |
Irene Wapnir | Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA | Intraoperative imaging of nipple perfusion patterns and ischemic complications in nipple sparing mastectomies |
Roberto Orecchia | IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy | The use of post-operative radiation following NSM |
Scott L Spear (pending) | Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA | Evaluating long-term outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction in the irradiated breast |
Shawn T Steen | Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, USA | Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics |
Acknowledgements
Disclosure: The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Nava MB, Catanuto G, Pennati A, et al. Conservative mastectomies. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:681-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]