Abstract
Skeletal muscle atrophy remains a clinical problem in numerous pathologic conditions. β2-Adrenergic receptor agonists, such as formoterol, can induce mitochondrial biogenesis (MB) to prevent such atrophy. Additionally, atomoxetine, an FDA-approved norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, was positive in a cellular assay for MB. We used a mouse model of dexamethasone-induced skeletal muscle atrophy to investigate the potential role of atomoxetine and formoterol to prevent muscle mass loss. Mice were administered dexamethasone once daily in the presence or absence of formoterol (0.3 mg/kg), atomoxetine (0.1 mg/kg), or sterile saline. Animals were euthanized at 8, 16, and 24 hours or 8 days later. Gastrocnemius muscle weights, changes in mRNA and protein expression of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 α (PGC-1α) isoforms, ATP synthase β, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 β subcomplex, 8, ND1, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), myostatin, muscle Ring-finger protein-1 (muscle atrophy), phosphorylated forkhead box protein O 3a (p-FoxO3a), Akt, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and ribosomal protein S6 (rp-S6; muscle hypertrophy) in naive and muscle-atrophied mice were measured. Atomoxetine increased p-mTOR 24 hours after treatment in naïve mice, but did not change any other biomarkers. Formoterol robustly activated the PGC-1α-4-IGF1–Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 pathway and increased p-FoxO3a as early as 8 hours and repressed myostatin at 16 hours. In contrast to what was observed with acute treatment, chronic treatment (7 days) with atomoxetine increased p-Akt and p-FoxO3a, and sustained PGC-1α expression and skeletal muscle mass in dexamethasone-treated mice, in a manner comparable to formoterol. In conclusion, chronic treatment with a low dose of atomoxetine prevented dexamethasone-induced skeletal muscle wasting and supports a potential role in preventing muscle atrophy.
Introduction
Skeletal muscle is remarkably malleable, phenotypically adapting to functional demands. Exercise training is known to induce muscle hypertrophy and is characterized by growth of existing myofibrils (Fluck, 2006). Skeletal muscle atrophy is defined as a decrease in muscle mass that occurs when protein degradation exceeds protein synthesis (Fanzani et al., 2012). Glucocorticoids are well established inducers of catabolism, and numerous pathologic conditions characterized by muscle atrophy (cachexia, chronic kidney disease, metabolic acidosis, sepsis, diabetes, etc.) are associated with increases in circulating glucocorticoids, suggesting a potential role for them in the development of atrophy (Slee, 2012; Schakman et al., 2013). Clinically, severe muscle atrophy, especially when it occurs concurrently with other chronic disease states, is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality (Metter et al., 2002; Pocock et al., 2008; He et al., 2013). Currently, no FDA-approved drugs are available to treat muscle atrophy, underscoring the importance of elucidating atrophy-associated signaling pathways and developing drugs to prevent skeletal muscle atrophy.
Recent reports describe an intricate network of signaling pathways that operate in muscle cells to regulate myofiber size and muscle performance (Bonaldo and Sandri, 2013). These different pathways cross-talk and modulate one another, simultaneously coordinating protein synthesis and degradation. Major pathways leading to atrophy are activation of myostatin, nuclear factor κB, and the E3-ligase transcription factor forkhead box protein O 3a (FoxO3a), which accelerates protein degradation primarily through activation of muscle atrophy F-box/muscle-specific ubiquitin E3-ligases atrophy gene-1, and muscle RING-finger protein-1 (MuRF-1) (McPherron et al., 1997; Bodine et al., 2001; Gomes et al., 2001; Lee, 2004; Sacheck et al., 2007; Bonaldo and Sandri, 2013). High-dose glucocorticoid treatment (e.g., dexamethasone) is a standard animal model of skeletal muscle atrophy. Dexamethasone is thought to induce atrophy, in part, by indirectly preventing the activation of FoxO3a and MuRF-1 (Qin et al., 2010; Bonaldo and Sandri, 2013; Schiaffino et al., 2013).
In contrast, skeletal muscle growth is regulated by the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin (IGF-1–Akt-mTOR) pathway (Musaro et al., 2001; Adams, 2002a,b; Schiaffino et al., 2013). Akt stimulates protein synthesis by activating mTOR and its downstream effector ribosomal protein S6 (rp-S6) (Adams, 2002b; Bonaldo and Sandri, 2013; Schiaffino et al., 2013). In addition, Akt can prevent muscle protein degradation by phosphorylating FoxO3a to prevent nuclear translocation and activation of MuRF-1 (Sandri et al., 2004; Senf et al., 2010).
In vivo and in vitro models have established a role for peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 α (PGC-1α) in preventing muscle wasting (Bonaldo and Sandri, 2013). PGC-1α is a transcriptional coactivator that regulates the transcription of genes that drive mitochondrial biogenesis (MB) (Wu et al., 1999). Recently, alternative splice variants of the PGC-1α gene have been identified (Ruas et al., 2012). Each of the individual PGC-1α isoforms regulates a discrete gene program. For example, the induction of the PGC-1α1 isoform promotes MB and regulates mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation gene expression (Mootha et al., 2004; Schreiber et al., 2004). Interestingly, PGC-1α1 has also been reported as preventing muscle atrophy by negatively regulating expression of MuRF-1, preventing active nuclear forms of FoxO from binding to the MuRF-1 promoter region (Sandri et al., 2006; Brault et al., 2010; Qin et al., 2010). Treatment with high-dose dexamethasone has been reported to reduce total PGC-1α protein expression and increase transcription of the MuRF-1 atrogene (Qin et al., 2010). In contrast, the PGC-1α4 isoform specifically activates IGF-1 expression and represses myostatin, which was shown to increase muscle mass, strength, and resistance to muscle wasting in a model of cancer cachexia (Ruas et al., 2012).
The benefits of therapeutic intervention with β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) agonists in animal models of muscle atrophy have been previously established (Sato et al., 2011). β2-AR agonists, such as clenbuterol and formoterol, are considered progrowth and antiatrophic drugs (Kline et al., 2007). Formoterol induces skeletal muscle hypertrophy through activation of the Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 pathway and prevention of protein degradation (Joassard et al., 2013a). However, chronic administration of high doses of β2-AR agonists have been documented as causing adverse cardiovascular effects (Sato et al., 2011). Therefore, drugs that can prevent muscle atrophy in the absence of adverse cardiovascular effects are needed.
Atomoxetine (or tomoxetine) is an FDA-approved drug to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by preventing the neuronal reuptake of norepinephrine (Bymaster et al., 2002). A recent screen to discover compounds that promote MB identified atomoxetine and β-adrenergic receptor agonists as potent inducers of MB (Peterson et al., 2013). Given the previously established links between MB-associated pathways and the prevention of muscle atrophy, we sought to evaluate the role atomoxetine in preventing dexamethasone-induced skeletal muscle atrophy and to identify associated signaling pathways. Efficacy and signaling mechanisms were compared with formoterol, which is well characterized and has previously been used in this model.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Treatments
Male C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor ME), 6–8 weeks of age (25–30 g), were housed in temperature-controlled conditions under a light/dark photocycle with food and water supplied ad libitum.
Acute Treatment Details.
Groups of naive mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of sterile saline, 0.3 mg/kg of formoterol fumarate dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or 0.1 mg/kg atomoxetine (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK). Animals were euthanized at 8, 16, and 24 hours after treatments.
Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy Model.
One group of mice was coinjected intraperitoneally with sterile saline daily for 7 days. Three groups of mice were coinjected intraperitoneally with 25 mg/kg water-soluble dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by a second injection of sterile saline, 0.3 mg/kg of formoterol, or 0.1 mg/kg atomoxetine, respectively, daily for 7 days. Animals were euthanized on the 8th day.
Body weights were measured and gastrocnemius muscles were removed, weighed, and flash-frozen for mRNA and protein analysis. All animal and treatment protocols were in compliance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted and promulgated by the US National Institutes of Health and were approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted from mouse gastrocnemius tissue samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was synthesized via reverse transcription using the iScript Advanced cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with 5 μg of RNA. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis was performed with cDNA and carried out using 5 μl of cDNA template combined with Brilliant II SYBR Green master mix (Stratagene/Agilent Technologies, La Jolla, CA) at a final concentration of 1× and primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA) at a concentration of 400 nM. mRNA expression of all genes was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method normalized to β-actin. Primer sequences are as follows:
Total PGC-1α (EX2) (FW: 5′-TGA TGT GAA TGA CTT GGA TAC AGA CA-3′, REV: 5′-GCT CAT TGT TGT ACT GGT TGG ATA TG-3′),
PGC-1α1 (FW: 5′-GGA CAT GTG CAG CCA AGA CTC T-3′, REV: 5′-CAC TTC AAT CCA CCC AGA AAG CT-3′),
PGC-1α4 (FW: 5′-TCA CAC CAA ACC CAC AGA AA-3′, REV: 5′-CTG GAA GAT ATG GCA CAT-3′),
Myostatin (FW: 5′-AGT GGA TCT AAA TGA GGG CAG T-3′, REV: 5′-GTT TCC AGG CGC AGC TTA-3′),
IGF-1 (FW: 5′-TGC TCT TCA GTT CGT GTG-3′, REV: 5′-ACA TCT CCA GTC TCC TCA G-3′),
β-Actin (FW: 5′- GGG ATG TTT GCT CCA ACC AA-3′, REV: 5′-GCG CTT TTG ACT CAG GAT TTA-3′).
Mitochondrial DNA Content
qPCR was used to measure the relative quantity of mtDNA in mouse gastrocnemius tissue samples. After treatment, DNA was extracted from tissue using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and 5 ng of DNA was used for qPCR. ND1 (FW: 5′-TAG AAC GCA AAA TCT TAG GG-3′, REV: 5′-TGC TAG TGT GAG TGA TAG GG-3′) was used as the mitochondrial gene, and expression was normalized to nuclear-encoded β-actin expression.
Immunoblot Analysis
Mouse gastrocnemius skeletal muscle tissue was homogenized in 5 volumes of protein lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 1 mM EDTA; 1 mM EGTA; 2 mM sodium orthovanadate; 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; 1 mM HEPES, pH 7.6; 1 μg/ml leupeptin; and 1 μg/ml aprotinin) using a Polytron homogenizer. The homogenate was stored on ice for 10 minutes and then centrifuged at 7500g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, and protein was measured with a bicinchoninic acid kit (Sigma-Aldrich) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Proteins (50–75 μg) were separated on 4–20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked either in 5% dried milk or bovine serum albumin in 0.1% Tween 20 in 1× Tris-buffered saline and incubated with 1:1000 antibody dilutions of MuRF1 (ECM Biosciences, Versailles, KY); anti–PGC-1α (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA); anti-ATP synthase β, COX-1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti–NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 β subcomplex, 8 (NDUFB8; Invitrogen); total and phosphorylated anti-FoxO3a, Akt, mTOR, rp-S6 (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA); and anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Fitzgerald, Acton, MA) overnight at 4°C. After incubation for 2 hours at room temperature with secondary antibodies (1:2000) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, membranes were detected using chemiluminescence.
Data and Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 4–5) for all experiments. Multiple comparisons of normally distributed data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, as appropriate, and group means were compared using the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. Single comparisons were analyzed with the Student’s t test where appropriate. The criterion for statistical differences was P ≤ 0.05 for all comparisons.
Results
Acute Treatment with Formoterol, but Not Atomoxetine, Differentially Modulates PGC-1α Isoform Expression in Skeletal Muscle of Naive Mice.
PGC-1α1 has been described as a “master regulator” of MB (Pearen et al., 2008, 2009; Wills et al., 2012). In contrast, PGC-1α4, a recently discovered PGC-1α splice variant, induces a discrete gene program resulting in muscle hypertrophy but not MB (Ruas et al., 2012). It is important to note that all variants of the PGC-1α gene identified by Ruas et al. (2012) contain the exon 2 (EX2) region. Therefore, primer sequences that contain this region measure total PGC-1α expression (all isoforms). Because identification of the specific PGC-1α isoform induced by formoterol or atomoxetine has not been identified, we evaluated the effects of acute formoterol or atomoxetine treatment on PGC-1α isoform mRNA in skeletal muscle of naive mice.
Formoterol caused a 12-fold induction of total PGC-1α (EX2, representative of all PGC-1α isoforms) at 8 hours post-treatment, which decreased and returned to baseline at 24 hours (Fig. 1A). PGC-1α1 gene expression was suppressed at 8 hours post-treatment with formoterol and returned to control levels by 24 hours (Fig. 1B). Formoterol induced PGC-1α4 gene expression at 8 hours after treatment (6-fold increase over vehicle) and returned to control levels by 24 hours (Fig. 1C). In contrast, atomoxetine had no effect on EX2 or PGC-1α1 and expression of PGC-1α4 was decreased 20–25% at 16 and 24 hours after treatment (Fig. 1, D–F).
Fig. 1.
PGC-1α isoform gene expression in skeletal muscle of naive mice after formoterol or atomoxetine treatment. Naive mice were given a single dose of either formoterol (0.3 mg/kg i.p.), atomoxetine (0.1 mg/kg i.p.), or sterile saline (veh i.p.) and euthanized at 8, 16, and 24 hours. Gastrocnemius muscle was excised from animals at each time point and RNA was isolated for qPCR analysis. Total PGC1α (EX2), PGC1α1, and PGC1-1α4 at 0, 8, 16, and 24 hours after treatment with formoterol (A–C) or atomoxetine (D–F). Data were normalized to vehicle and represented as a relative fold-change. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 5). *Significantly different from untreated mice (P ≤ 0.05).
Formoterol, but Not Atomoxetine, Treatment Acutely Increases IGF-1 Gene Expression and Suppresses Myostatin.
PGC-1α4 regulates a discrete gene program responsible for inducing skeletal muscle hypertrophy via induction of IGF-1 and suppression of myostatin (Ruas et al., 2012). Formoterol increased IGF-1 gene expression 2-fold at 8 hours post-treatment, which returned to baseline at 24 hours (Fig. 2A). In addition, formoterol suppressed myostatin (MYSTN) gene expression 50% at 16 hours post-treatment (Fig. 2B). Atomoxetine did not alter IGF-1 or MYSTN (Fig. 2, C and D).
Fig. 2.

IGF-1 and myostatin gene expression in skeletal muscle of naive mice after formoterol or atomoxetine treatment. Mice were treated as described in Fig. 1. Expression of IGF-1 and myostatin at 0, 8, 16, and 24 hours after treatment with formoterol (A and B) or atomoxetine (C and D). Data were normalized to vehicle and represented as a relative fold-change. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 5). *Significantly different from untreated mice (P ≤ 0.05).
Atomoxetine Acutely Increases Phosphorylated mTOR Protein Expression.
Formoterol induces skeletal muscle hypertrophy through the Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 pathway (Joassard et al., 2013a,b). In addition, formoterol prevents muscle atrophy via phosphorylation (p) of FoxO3a (Joassard et al., 2013a). Formoterol increased protein expression of p-FoxO3a, p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-rp-S6 8 hours after treatment (Fig. 3, A–E). Atomoxetine increased p-mTOR protein expression 24 hours after treatment without altering rp-S6 phosphorylation (Fig. 3, F–J). These results reveal acute formoterol treatment activates hypertrophy pathways via PGC-1α4–mediated increases in IGF-1 expression and represses MYSTN expression downstream of p-FoxO3a, p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-S6 (Fig. 4). In contrast, atomoxetine had minimal or no effects on these pathways with the exception of a modest increase in p-mTOR at 24 hours.
Fig. 3.
Acute effects of atomoxetine and formoterol on protein synthesis signaling mechanisms in skeletal muscle of naive mice. Mice were treated as described in Fig. 1. Representative immunoblots for markers of muscle protein homeostasis: total and phosphorylated forms of Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis and FoxO3a at 0, 8, and 24 hours after either formoterol (A) or atomoxetine (F). Densitometric analysis of FoxO3a (B), Akt (C), mTOR (D), and rp-S6 (E) ± formoterol; densitometric analysis of FoxO3a (G), Akt (H), mTOR (I), and rp-S6 (J) ± atomoxetine. Data were normalized to vehicle and represented as relative fold-change. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 4). *Significantly different from untreated mice (P ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Proposed pathways of formoterol action in the skeletal muscle of mice after acute treatment. Acute formoterol (Form) treatment leads to alternative splicing of the PGC-1α gene resulting in higher PGC-1α4 expression. PGC-1α4 induces IGF-1 transcription and protein production, which acts via autocrine signaling to activate the IGF-1R. The IGF-1R initiates phosphorylation (P) of the Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis and hypertrophy. Inactivation of atrophy is mediated by Akt phosphorylation of FoxO3a and PGC-1α4 suppression of MYSTN gene expression. Alternatively, phosphorylation of Akt may result from β2-AR stimulation. Solid shapes represent proteins and helices within the nucleus represent genes, solid black arrows are pathways suggested by our data and supported by the literature. A dotted line represents a potential alternative mechanism and a “?” denotes that future experiments are warranted for full elucidation. All arrows represent activation, with the exception of the arrow from Akt to p-FoxO3a, where phosphorylation inactivates FoxO3a. Lines with blunted ends represent inhibition.
Chronic Treatment with Formoterol and/or Atomoxetine Restores Mitochondrial Proteins, Increases Hypertrophy Markers, and Preserves Gastrocnemius Muscle Mass in Mice with Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy.
Using a previously described model of skeletal muscle atrophy (Wada et al., 2011), chronic treatment with dexamethasone resulted in a 17% reduction in gastrocnemius muscle mass, and low-dose formoterol or atomoxetine prevented this loss (Fig. 5A). After seven daily doses, neither dexamethasone nor atomoxetine treatment had any effect on the expression of PGC-1α1 mRNA. However, formoterol increased PGC-1α1 mRNA content (Fig. 5B) but had no effect on mtDNA copy number, as measured by ND1 gene expression (Fig. 5C). Dexamethasone reduced PGC-1α protein 1 week after treatment. In contrast, concomitant treatment of dexamethasone with either formoterol or atomoxetine sustained PGC-1α protein (Fig. 5, D and E). ATP synthase β and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX I) protein expression increased after treatment with formoterol in dexamethasone-treated mice, but there was no effect on NDUFB8 (Fig. 5D). Atomoxetine did not alter mitochondrial protein expression in dexamethasone-treated mice (Fig. 5E). These results reveal that prevention of PGC-1α protein loss by formoterol leads to partial MB with an increase in mitochondrial proteins, whereas atomoxetine prevents PGC-1α protein loss but does not induce MB.
Fig. 5.

Chronic effects of atomoxetine and formoterol on skeletal muscle mass and mitochondrial proteins in dexamethasone-treated mice. Mice were coadministered a daily dose of 25 mg/kg water soluble-dexamethasone ± 0.3 mg/kg of formoterol/0.1 mg/kg of atomoxetine or sterile saline (i.p.) for 7 days. Appropriate saline controls were maintained throughout the experiment. Animals were euthanized after 8 days and gastrocnemius muscle was isolated from both right and the left hind limbs. (A) Normalized gastrocnemius muscle mass 8 days after treating dexamethasone-dosed mice with saline, formoterol, or atomoxetine. Gene expression analysis for PGC-1α1 (B) and ND1 (C). Representative immunoblots and respective densitometry for mitochondrial proteins: total PGC1α1, ATP synthase β, COX-1, and NDUFB8 8 days after either formoterol [BD 0.3 mg/kg; (D)] or atomoxetine [0.1 mg/kg; (E)]. Data were normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 4–5). *Significantly different from either saline-treated controls or all other groups of mice (P ≤ 0.05). #Significantly different from dexamethasone-treated mice (P ≤ 0.05).
IGF-1 gene expression increased with formoterol in dexamethasone-treated mice despite a decrease in the PGC-1α4 isoform (Fig. 6, A and B). Atomoxetine had no effect on PGC-1α4, IGF-1, or MYSTN in dexamethasone-treated mice (Fig. 6, A–C). Formoterol and atomoxetine consistently increased phosphorylation of Akt in dexamethasone-treated mice (Fig. 7). However, only formoterol increased Akt and mTOR phosphorylation and, surprisingly, decreased p-rp-S6 (Fig. 7B). Atomoxetine markedly increased phosphorylation of FOXO3a but did not affect phosphorylation of mTOR or rp-S6 (Fig. 7). Formoterol and atomoxetine prevented the increase in protein expression of MuRF-1 in dexamethasone-treated mice (Fig. 8).
Fig. 6.
Chronic effects of atomoxetine and formoterol on hypertrophy and atrophy-associated proteins in skeletal muscle of dexamethasone-treated mice. Mice were treated as described in Fig. 5. qPCR analysis of gene expression for proteins of muscle hypertrophy, PGC-1α4 (A), IGF-1 (B), and atrophy, MYSTN (C). Data were normalized to vehicle and represented as a relative fold-change. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 5). *Significantly different from untreated mice (P ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 7.
Chronic effects of atomoxetine and formoterol on protein-synthesis signaling mechanisms in skeletal muscle of dexamethasone-treated mice. Mice were treated as described in Fig. 5. Representative immunoblots and densitometric analysis for markers of muscle protein homeostasis: total and phosphorylated forms of FoxO3a, Akt, mTOR, and ribosomal protein rp-S6 after respective treatments with either formoterol [0.3 mg/kg; (A and B)] or atomoxetine [0.1 mg/kg; (C and D)]. Data were normalized to vehicle and represented as a relative fold-change. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 4–5). *Significantly different from either saline-treated controls or all other groups of mice (P ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 8.
Chronic effects of atomoxetine and formoterol on muscle atrophy markers in skeletal muscle of dexamethasone-treated mice. Mice were treated as described in Fig. 5. Representative immunoblots and densitometric analysis for markers of skeletal muscle protein breakdown: MuRF-1 after respective treatments with either formoterol [Form; 0.3 mg/kg; (A)] or atomoxetine [0.1 mg/kg; (B)]. Data were normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Data are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 4–5). *Significantly different from saline-treated controls (P ≤ 0.05). #Significantly different from dexamethasone-treated mice (P ≤ 0.05).
Discussion
Recently, alternative splice variants of PGC-1α have been identified (Ruas et al., 2012), each regulating a discrete gene program. Specifically, induction of the PGC-1α1 isoform regulates MB, whereas PGC-1α4 induces muscle hypertrophy independent of MB (Ruas et al., 2012). A low dose of formoterol (0.3 mg/kg), a long acting β2-adrenergic receptor agonist, stimulated alternative splicing of the PGC-1α gene, increasing PGC-1α4 expression and suppressing PGC-1α1. The induction of PGC-1α4 was associated with the suppression of myostatin and the activation of IGF-1–Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 pathway in acute naive animals. In unpublished studies, we observed that ICI 118,551, a highly selective β2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, blocked formoterol-induced increases in PGC-1α4 at 16 hours (data not shown). Thus, low-dose formoterol promotes skeletal muscle hypertrophy and prevents protein turnover via the β2-adrenergic receptor.
The observed alterations in the phosphorylation status of FoxO3a, PGC-1α1 protein expression, and the activation of the Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis were similar to previously reported data (Pearen et al., 2009; Koopman et al., 2010; Qin et al., 2010). Prior to the discovery of the PGC-1α4 isoform, Pearen et al. (2008, 2009) reported an increase in total PGC-1α gene expression approximately 8 hours post-treatment with formoterol and observed no change in myostatin in the tibialis anterior of naive C57BL/6 mice. In contrast, we found that upregulation of total PGC-1α (EX2) gene expression observed at 8 hours was driven primarily by PGC-1α4 and not the PGC-1α1 isoform. PGC-1α4 is an inducer of IGF-1 (Ruas et al., 2012), which then functions to repress myostatin gene expression. All PGC-1α splice variants contain the exon 2 region and this may explain the disparity between our data and that of (Pearen et al., 2009). Specifically, primers spanning EX2 were incorporated in their studies. Also, the divergence in findings may be attributable to model dissimilarities, including types of skeletal muscle tissue analyzed.
Recently, we reported that atomoxetine, an FDA-approved norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) to treat ADHD, stimulates MB in a high throughput screening assay with renal proximal tubules cells (Peterson et al., 2013). Subsequent cheminformatic profiling of the β2-adrenergic receptor agonists and nisoxetine and atomoxetine led to the identification of four chemical moieties shared by atomoxetine and formoterol (Peterson et al., 2013), suggesting that atomoxetine and nisoxetine may act directly on the β2-adrenergic receptor. Other studies have shown that atomoxetine may activate β-adrenergic receptors indirectly by increasing norepinephrine (Springer et al., 1994; Mirbolooki et al., 2013). Despite chemical similarity to formoterol, acute atomoxetine treatment in naive mice did not increase phosphorylated FoxO3a, activate the Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis, or induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Additionally, short-term exposure to atomoxetine did not appear to modulate PGC-1α1/4 gene expression but did increase p-mTOR, as did formoterol. The interpretation of this finding is difficult given that there are numerous upstream modulators and downstream effectors of mTOR activation. On the basis of these data, we surmise that atomoxetine is not associated with the direct activation of the β-adrenergic receptor and that downstream signaling is elicited through an alternative pathway, perhaps related to its NRI pharmacology.
In an atrophy model, treatment with dexamethasone resulted in the activation of atrophic pathways, such as decreases in p-FoxO3a and increased MuRF-1 expression. Dexamethasone treatment also inhibited mTOR, thereby disrupting hypertrophic effects of the IGF-1–Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis downstream of IGF-1 (Wang et al., 2006). We observed no change in mTOR or rp-S6 in dexamethasone-treated animals, but we observed evidence of atrophic activation through FoxO3a and increased expression of MuRF-1. We hypothesize that skeletal muscle atrophy in our dexamethasone model was attributable to atrophic mechanisms and not the inactivation of the IGF-1–Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis.
As expected, treatment with dexamethasone suppressed PGC-1α1 expression at 8 days; however, concomitant treatment with both formoterol or atomoxetine maintained PGC-1α1 levels equal to that of controls. Interestingly, PGC-1α4 expression declined with formoterol treatment, confirming that formoterol can cause differential expression of these alternatively spliced variants. Despite sustained expression of PGC-1α1, MB was initiated but remained incomplete, as only some mitochondrial proteins increased with formoterol treatment.
It is important to note that p-Akt prevents the dephosphorylation of FoxO3a, limiting its entry into the nucleus and the subsequent induction of MuRF-1 (Sandri et al., 2006). Furthermore, transcriptional activity of nuclear FoxO3a can be inhibited by PGC-1α1 (Sandri et al., 2006). Our observations of increased p-FoxO3a and decreased MuRF-1 with atomoxetine or formoterol treatment provide evidence that atomoxetine and formoterol have antiatrophic properties. Our findings in the dexamethasone study are summarized for formoterol (Fig. 9A) and atomoxetine (Fig. 9B) in a diagram.
Fig. 9.
Proposed mechanisms preventing muscle atrophy associated with chronic treatment of atomoxetine or formoterol in skeletal muscle of dexamethasone-treated mice. Chronic formoterol (Form) (A) treatment sustained PGC-1α1 gene and protein expression, leading to increased oxidative phosphorylation proteins. IGF-1 gene expression also increased at this time, but what drives its expression is uncertain (?). Formoterol sustained an increase in phosphorylation of the Akt-mTOR axis, indicating activation and a possible mechanism for protein synthesis. Atomoxetine (Atomox) (B) sustained p-Akt but could not activate the entire axis. In both treatment groups, concomitant inactivation of FoxO3a occurred, as depicted by increased phosphorylation with suppression of MuRF-1 gene expression, blocking a major mechanism for protein degradation. In addition, increased PGC-1α1 observed with either treatment may block the transcription of MuRF-1 and represent an antiatrophic mechanism. Red lines shown are proposed mechanisms for protein degradation with dexamethasone treatment operating through the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Refer to Fig. 4 for further description of the diagram.
Because atomoxetine is an NRI (Bymaster et al., 2002) and norepinephrine has been demonstrated to modulate PGC-1α1 through the β2-adrenergic receptor (Wu et al., 1999), it is plausible that indirect β2-adrenergic receptor agonism by atomoxetine through norepinephrine may explain our results. However, norepinephrine is a less potent stimulator of the β2-adrenergic receptor than formoterol, and downstream signaling events may be more susceptible to internal regulation, a concept that would explain the lack of observable changes in naive mice.
In summary, we have identified formoterol as a potent inducer of skeletal muscle hypertrophy, which is associated with concomitant increases in PGC-1α4 and IGF-1, downregulation of myostatin, and activation of the Akt-mTOR-rp-S6 axis. Formoterol also prevented catabolism, as evidenced by a decrease in MuRF-1. In addition, we report that atomoxetine, used at a dose lower than that clinically approved for ADHD, was efficacious in the prevention of skeletal muscle atrophy in a model of dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy. Furthermore, atomoxetine prevented muscle atrophy by sustaining PGC-1α1 expression, activating Akt, increasing p-FoxO3a, and suppressing MuRF-1. Additional experiments are warranted to define the full dose response of atomoxetine.
Although β2-adrenergic receptor agonists are potent catabolic agents, their potential clinical success for skeletal muscle atrophy is limited by their potential cardiac side effects (Carbo et al., 1997; Soppa et al., 2005; Ryall et al., 2006; Pearen et al., 2009). Atomoxetine did not stimulate skeletal muscle hypertrophy in either of the models tested but was efficacious in preventing atrophy in the dexamethasone model. These characteristics suggest that atomoxetine has potential for therapeutic use in preventing skeletal muscle atrophy.
Abbreviations
- ADHD
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- β2-AR
β2-adrenergic receptor
- EX2
exon 2
- FoxO3a
forkhead box protein O 3a
- IGF-1
insulin-like growth factor 1
- MB
mitochondrial biogenesis
- mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
- MuRF-1
muscle RING-finger protein-1
- MYSTN
myostatin
- NDUFB8
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 β subcomplex, 8
- NRI
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor
- PGC-1α
peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 α
- qPCR
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
- rp-S6
ribosomal protein S6
Authorship Contributions
Participated in research design: Jesinkey, Korrapati, Rasbach, Beeson, Schnellmann.
Conducted experiments: Jesinkey, Korrapati.
Performed data analysis: Jesinkey, Korrapati, Schnellmann.
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Jesinkey, Korrapati, Schnellmann.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences [Grant R01-GM084147]; the National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources [Grant UL1-RR029882]; the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs [BX-000851]; an SC COBRE in Oxidants, Redox Balance, and Stress Signaling [P20 GM103542-02]; and the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, which has an academic home at the Medical University of South Carolina. Animal facilities were funded by National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources [Grant C06-RR015455].
References
- Adams GR. (2002a) Autocrine and/or paracrine insulin-like growth factor-I activity in skeletal muscle. Clin Orthop Relat Res (403, Suppl)S188–S196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams GR. (2002b) Invited Review: Autocrine/paracrine IGF-I and skeletal muscle adaptation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 93:1159–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bodine SC, Latres E, Baumhueter S, Lai VK, Nunez L, Clarke BA, Poueymirou WT, Panaro FJ, Na E, Dharmarajan K, et al. (2001) Identification of ubiquitin ligases required for skeletal muscle atrophy. Science 294:1704–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonaldo P, Sandri M. (2013) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy. Dis Model Mech 6:25–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brault JJ, Jespersen JG, Goldberg AL. (2010) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha or 1beta overexpression inhibits muscle protein degradation, induction of ubiquitin ligases, and disuse atrophy. J Biol Chem 285:19460–19471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bymaster FP, Katner JS, Nelson DL, Hemrick-Luecke SK, Threlkeld PG, Heiligenstein JH, Morin SM, Gehlert DR, Perry KW. (2002) Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:699–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbó N, López-Soriano J, Tarragó T, González O, Llovera M, López-Soriano FJ, Argilés JM. (1997) Comparative effects of beta2-adrenergic agonists on muscle waste associated with tumour growth. Cancer Lett 115:113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fanzani A, Conraads VM, Penna F, Martinet W. (2012) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy: an update. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 3:163–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flück M. (2006) Functional, structural and molecular plasticity of mammalian skeletal muscle in response to exercise stimuli. J Exp Biol 209:2239–2248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes MD, Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, Navon A, Goldberg AL. (2001) Atrogin-1, a muscle-specific F-box protein highly expressed during muscle atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14440–14445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He WA, Berardi E, Cardillo VM, Acharyya S, Aulino P, Thomas-Ahner J, Wang J, Bloomston M, Muscarella P, Nau P, et al. (2013) NF-κB-mediated Pax7 dysregulation in the muscle microenvironment promotes cancer cachexia. J Clin Invest 123:4821–4835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joassard OR, Amirouche A, Gallot YS, Desgeorges MM, Castells J, Durieux AC, Berthon P, Freyssenet DG. (2013a) Regulation of Akt-mTOR, ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome pathways in response to formoterol administration in rat skeletal muscle. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45:2444–2455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joassard OR, Durieux AC, Freyssenet DG. (2013b) β2-Adrenergic agonists and the treatment of skeletal muscle wasting disorders. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45:2309–2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kline WO, Panaro FJ, Yang H, Bodine SC. (2007) Rapamycin inhibits the growth and muscle-sparing effects of clenbuterol. J Appl Physiol (1985) 102:740–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koopman R, Gehrig SM, Léger B, Trieu J, Walrand S, Murphy KT, Lynch GS. (2010) Cellular mechanisms underlying temporal changes in skeletal muscle protein synthesis and breakdown during chronic beta-adrenoceptor stimulation in mice. J Physiol 588:4811–4823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SJ. (2004) Regulation of muscle mass by myostatin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:61–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee SJ. (1997) Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 387:83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit R. (2002) Skeletal muscle strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:B359–B365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mirbolooki MR, Constantinescu CC, Pan ML, Mukherjee J. (2013) Targeting presynaptic norepinephrine transporter in brown adipose tissue: a novel imaging approach and potential treatment for diabetes and obesity. Synapse 67:79–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mootha VK, Handschin C, Arlow D, Xie X, St Pierre J, Sihag S, Yang W, Altshuler D, Puigserver P, Patterson N, et al. (2004) Erralpha and Gabpa/b specify PGC-1alpha-dependent oxidative phosphorylation gene expression that is altered in diabetic muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6570–6575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musarò A, McCullagh K, Paul A, Houghton L, Dobrowolny G, Molinaro M, Barton ER, Sweeney HL, Rosenthal N. (2001) Localized Igf-1 transgene expression sustains hypertrophy and regeneration in senescent skeletal muscle. Nat Genet 27:195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearen MA, Myers SA, Raichur S, Ryall JG, Lynch GS, Muscat GE. (2008) The orphan nuclear receptor, NOR-1, a target of beta-adrenergic signaling, regulates gene expression that controls oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle. Endocrinology 149:2853–2865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearen MA, Ryall JG, Lynch GS, Muscat GE. (2009) Expression profiling of skeletal muscle following acute and chronic beta2-adrenergic stimulation: implications for hypertrophy, metabolism and circadian rhythm. BMC Genomics 10:448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson YK, Cameron RB, Wills LP, Trager RE, Lindsey CC, Beeson CC, Schnellmann RG. (2013) β2-Adrenoceptor agonists in the regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 23:5376–5381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pocock SJ, McMurray JJ, Dobson J, Yusuf S, Granger CB, Michelson EL, Ostergren J, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Anker SD, et al. (2008) Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. Eur Heart J 29:2641–2650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin W, Pan J, Wu Y, Bauman WA, Cardozo C. (2010) Protection against dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy is related to modulation by testosterone of FOXO1 and PGC-1α. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 403:473–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruas JL, White JP, Rao RR, Kleiner S, Brannan KT, Harrison BC, Greene NP, Wu J, Estall JL, Irving BA, et al. (2012) A PGC-1α isoform induced by resistance training regulates skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Cell 151:1319–1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryall JG, Sillence MN, Lynch GS. (2006) Systemic administration of beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, formoterol and salmeterol, elicit skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats at micromolar doses. Br J Pharmacol 147:587–595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sacheck JM, Hyatt JP, Raffaello A, Jagoe RT, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, Lecker SH, Goldberg AL. (2007) Rapid disuse and denervation atrophy involve transcriptional changes similar to those of muscle wasting during systemic diseases. FASEB J 21:140–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandri M, Sandri C, Gilbert A, Skurk C, Calabria E, Picard A, Walsh K, Schiaffino S, Lecker SH, Goldberg AL. (2004) Foxo transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy. Cell 117:399–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandri M, Lin J, Handschin C, Yang W, Arany ZP, Lecker SH, Goldberg AL, Spiegelman BM. (2006) PGC-1alpha protects skeletal muscle from atrophy by suppressing FoxO3 action and atrophy-specific gene transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16260–16265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato S, Shirato K, Tachiyashiki K, Imaizumi K. (2011) Muscle plasticity and β₂-adrenergic receptors: adaptive responses of β₂-adrenergic receptor expression to muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:729598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schakman O, Kalista S, Barbé C, Loumaye A, Thissen JP. (2013) Glucocorticoid-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45:2163–2172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiaffino S, Dyar KA, Ciciliot S, Blaauw B, Sandri M. (2013) Mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle growth and atrophy. FEBS J 280:4294–4314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schreiber SN, Emter R, Hock MB, Knutti D, Cardenas J, Podvinec M, Oakeley EJ, Kralli A. (2004) The estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) functions in PPARgamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha)-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6472–6477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senf SM, Dodd SL, Judge AR. (2010) FOXO signaling is required for disuse muscle atrophy and is directly regulated by Hsp70. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 298:C38–C45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slee AD. (2012) Exploring metabolic dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Nutr Metab (Lond) 9:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soppa GK, Smolenski RT, Latif N, Yuen AH, Malik A, Karbowska J, Kochan Z, Terracciano CM, Yacoub MH. (2005) Effects of chronic administration of clenbuterol on function and metabolism of adult rat cardiac muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H1468–H1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Springer JP, Kropp BP, Thor KB. (1994) Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors on hypogastric nerve-evoked urethral contractions in the cat: a prominent role of urethral beta-adrenergic receptors. J Urol 152:515–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wada S, Kato Y, Okutsu M, Miyaki S, Suzuki K, Yan Z, Schiaffino S, Asahara H, Ushida T, Akimoto T. (2011) Translational suppression of atrophic regulators by microRNA-23a integrates resistance to skeletal muscle atrophy. J Biol Chem 286:38456–38465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H, Kubica N, Ellisen LW, Jefferson LS, Kimball SR. (2006) Dexamethasone represses signaling through the mammalian target of rapamycin in muscle cells by enhancing expression of REDD1. J Biol Chem 281:39128–39134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wills LP, Trager RE, Beeson GC, Lindsey CC, Peterson YK, Beeson CC, Schnellmann RG. (2012) The β2-adrenoceptor agonist formoterol stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 342:106–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Z, Puigserver P, Andersson U, Zhang C, Adelmant G, Mootha V, Troy A, Cinti S, Lowell B, Scarpulla RC, et al. (1999) Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell 98:115–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







