Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2003 Jan 2;91(2):119–127. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf210

Molecular and Cellular Adaptations of Maize to Flooding Stress

CHALIVENDRA C SUBBAIAH 1,, MARTIN M SACHS 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4244996  PMID: 12509333

Abstract

Anaerobic treatment dramatically alters the patterns of gene expression in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. During anaerobiosis there is an immediate repression of pre‐existing protein synthesis, with the concurrent initiation of a selective synthesis of approx. 20 proteins. Among these anaerobic proteins are enzymes involved in glycolysis and related processes. However, inducible genes that have different functions were also found; these may function in other, perhaps more long‐term, processes of adaptations to flooding, such as aerenchyma formation and root‐tip death. In this article we review our recent work on maize responses to flooding stress, which has addressed two questions: how are these gene expression changes initiated and how do they lead to adaptation to flooding stress? Our results indicate that an early rise in cytosolic Ca2+, as well as a quick establishment of ionic homeostasis, may be essential for the induction of adaptive changes at the cellular as well as organismal level.

Keywords: Key words: Review, maize (Zea mays L.), anoxia, signal transduction, calcium, ionic homeostasis, glutamate decarboxylase, aerenchyma, XET, root tip death, sucrose synthase, protease, flooding tolerance.

INTRODUCTION

Oxygen limitation is the primary plant stress in flooded soils. The sudden excess of water due to flooding not only threatens the food supply of human populations but also affects the vegetation in river plains. During 1993, approx. 20 million acres of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) were inundated in the mid‐western United States leading to heavy economic losses, as estimated by the United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (Suszkiw, 1994).

Anaerobic treatment of maize seedlings drastically alters the profile of total protein synthesis. In an anaerobic environment, 20 proteins, which account for more than 70 % of the total translation, are selectively synthesized (Sachs et al., 1980). Most of the anaerobic proteins (ANPs) identified were found to be enzymes of glycolysis or sugar‐phosphate metabolism, such as aldolase (Kelley and Tolan, 1986), pyruvate decarboxylase (Laszlo and St Lawrence, 1983; Kelley, 1989), enolase (Lal et al., 1998), glucose‐6‐phosphate isomerase (Kelley and Freeling, 1984), glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (Russell and Sachs, 1991), sucrose synthase (Springer et al., 1986) and alcohol dehydrogenase (Freeling, 1973). Additionally, three genes that are not involved in glucose‐phosphate metabolism (Vogel and Freeling, 1992; Peschke and Sachs, 1994; Saab and Sachs, 1995, 1996) have been found to be induced by anoxia, and may also encode ANPs.

Anaerobiosis results in alterations of gene expression in plants leading to the accumulation of ANPs. These alterations occur at transcriptional, translational and post‐translational levels (Ferl et al., 1980; Sachs et al., 1980; Rowland and Strommer, 1986; Bailey‐Serres et al., 1988; Dennis et al., 1989; Russell and Sachs, 1989, 1992; Webster et al., 1991; de Vetten and Ferl, 1995; Manjunath and Sachs, 1997; Manjunath et al., 1999; Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). At the level of translation, anaerobic treatment of maize seedlings disrupts polysomes (Bailey‐Serres and Freeling, 1990) and leads to a redirection of protein synthesis (Sachs et al., 1980; Russell and Sachs, 1992). In the first 5 h of anaerobic treatment (transition period) there is a rapid increase in the synthesis of a class of polypeptides (approx. 33 kDa; the transition polypeptides). After 90 min of anoxia, the synthesis of ANPs is induced. After 72 h, protein synthesis decreases concurrently with the start of seedling death (Sachs et al., 1980). The molecular basis of this selective translation is not yet fully understood. Post‐translational regulation of initiation factors and ribosomal proteins by reversible phosphorylation appears to play a role (Webster et al., 1991; Perez‐Mendez et al., 1993; Manjunath et al., 1999) in addition to the structural determinants in the untranslated regions of mRNA (Bailey‐Serres and Dawe, 1996). Other post‐translational changes of proteins have also been reported to occur under anoxia (e.g. Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). From 2‐D electrophoresis/MS analysis of proteins synthesized in the root tip under different oxygen regimes, Chang et al. (2000) also inferred that several proteins undergo post‐translational modifications under conditions of O2 deprivation. Besides this reprogramming of gene expression, metabolic (e.g. switch to a fermentative pathway; Kennedy et al., 1992) and structural (e.g. aerenchyma formation; Drew et al., 1979, 1985) changes occur during flooding. The maize anaerobic response has been extensively reviewed previously (Sachs, 1993, 1994; Sachs et al., 1996).

Previous work has focused on genes encoding enzymes involved in glucose‐phosphate metabolism, and their expression during oxygen deprivation. Our earlier work also identified a Ca2+‐mediated pathway of anoxic gene induction as well as post‐anoxic seedling survival. The emphasis of this review will be on our more recent work, i.e. the elaboration of early responses and how they relate to the long‐term anoxic tolerance of maize seedlings. Our results indicate that cytosolic Ca2+ changes are used by cells to establish ionic homeostasis, besides triggering the downstream signalling pathway. A few novel genes/loci that appear to play a role in plant responses and tolerance to flooding are also discussed. In the final part of the review, we surmise how these cellular and molecular responses are integrated at the organismal level to maximize survival under flooding stress.

Our discussion largely centres around work in our laboratory carried out on maize during the past few years. In most of these studies (with the exception of metabolic labelling experiments conducted in an anaerobic chamber), anoxia was imposed by completely submerging 3‐d‐old maize seedlings in flooding buffer; this treatment represents a progressive depletion of oxygen rather than a shock. Anoxia tolerance refers to the ability of seedlings to resume growth upon reoxygenation (e.g. Lemke‐Keyes and Sachs, 1989b; Subbaiah et al., 1994b; Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). Hypoxic treatment was given by ‘partial submergence’ (i.e. submerging the root portion only, leaving the shoot exposed to air; Saab and Sachs, 1996).

IONIC HOMEOSTASIS AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE ANOXIA SIGNALLING PATHWAY

Genes encoding the ANPs (e.g. adh1) are rapidly turned on even by mild hypoxia and are rapidly turned off upon reoxygenation (Freeling, 1973; Wignarajah and Greenway, 1976; Paul and Ferl, 1991; Chang et al., 2000). Such a response implicates a fast and precise O2‐sensing system operating in plant cells. However, until recently, the pathway leading to the perception and transduction of low O2 signals remained a ‘black box’.

The transient changes in Ca2+ and H+ that follow cell stimulation are immediately recognized even at sub‐micromolar levels, amplified and finally translated into long‐lasting biochemical and physiological responses by plant cells (e.g. Knight et al., 1996; Fasano et al., 2001; reviewed in Bush, 1995; Sanders et al., 1999). Deprivation of O2 leads to disturbances in ionic balance of plant cells, reflecting energy depletion and membrane depolarization (e.g. Roberts et al., 1984; Buwalda et al., 1988). We have shown that gene expression and physiological changes in response to O2 deprivation are preceded and signalled by an elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ in maize seedlings and cultured cells (Subbaiah et al., 1994a, b). We developed a single cell system to monitor cytosolic Ca2+ changes and an assay to measure anoxic responses in terms of expression of marker genes and seedling (or cell) survival (Subbaiah et al., 1994a, b). Using calcium channel antagonists and analysing cytosolic free calcium ([Ca]i) changes, we demonstrated that calcium acts as a transducer of low O2 signals both in suspension‐cultured cells and in intact seedlings (Subbaiah et al., 1994a, b). Ruthenium red (RR), a Ca2+ channel blocker, repressed the activation of the anoxia‐inducible genes and impaired the post‐anoxic survival of seedlings and cells (Subbaiah et al., 1994a, b). Ca2+, when supplied along with RR, allowed both anoxic gene expression and survival, showing that Ca2+ acted very early in the adaptive response to anoxia. In maize suspension‐cultured cells, O2 depletion caused an immediate (within minutes) increase in [Ca]i and this was reversible within a few seconds of reoxygenation. RR decreased the resting levels of [Ca]i and blocked the anoxic Ca2+ elevation. Caffeine, which induced an elevation of [Ca]i under aerobic conditions, caused an increase in ADH activity under normoxia.

Furthermore, we showed that Ca2+ influx was not necessary for the anoxia‐induced [Ca]i elevation or early anoxic responses, indicating that the Ca2+‐rise observed under anoxia was due to mobilization of the ion from intracellular stores (Subbaiah et al., 1994a). The origin of the calcium signal was traced as part of our attempt to elucidate the nature and intracellular location of the oxygen sensor. Being the primary site of oxygen consumption and also an important target of RR action, it was thought the mitochondrion might serve as a Ca2+ store in response to anoxia in maize cells. Confocal analysis using compartment‐specific Ca2+ probes showed that the Ca2+ signal probably originates in mitochondria (Subbaiah et al., 1998). The release of Ca2+ from mitochondria during early anoxia is probably not due to passive leakage of the ion, since it was not preceded by the depolarization of mitochondria. However, prolonged anoxia (longer than 30 min) leads to a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and thus may be responsible for further Ca2+ release. Furthermore, individual mitochondria within single maize cells responded differently to O2 deprivation (Subbaiah et al., 1998). While the role of plasma membrane redox systems and associated second messengers also needs to be examined, our findings placed mitochondria at the centre of oxygen sensing.

The elucidation of how O2 deprivation initiates Ca2+ release from mitochondria may indicate exactly where the changes in O2 levels are sensed in the cell. Since oxygen is more diffusive than any potential signal molecule that has to traverse the cellular membranes, anoxia may first be sensed at the mitochondrial electron transport chain, where O2 would no longer be available as an electron acceptor. However, in view of the sensitivity of gene expression changes even to mild alterations in O2 availability (Paul and Ferl, 1991), i.e. the genes are induced at much higher concentrations than the Km (O2) of cytochrome a3, a low affinity system could be a more appropriate sensor (such as a component of the plasma membrane redox system). The Ca2+ released from mitochondria may communicate the metabolic changes occurring in the cytosol (and mitochondria) under O2 deprivation to the nucleus. Consistent with this, our preliminary observations indicate that anoxia induces large changes in the nuclear localized Ca2+ levels (Subbaiah et al., 1998).

Exigent adaptations

The metabolic and structural adaptations to O2 deprivation are known to precede transcriptional activation/repression of genes, translation of specific mRNA species and post‐translational modification of proteins. Our aim is to understand how Ca2+ participates or leads to these events. In addition, we believe that the perturbations in cytosolic Ca2+ may also mediate immediate adaptations needed for cell survival in the short term. Under energy‐deprived conditions, an imminent danger to cells (the organism, as well) is an unregulated traffic of ions. For example, a continued elevation of Ca2+ or decline in pH, if unattenuated, is not only detrimental in the long run but may also impair the capacity of cells to mount the adaptive responses. Therefore, ionic homeostasis is probably a key component of the cellular adaptive pathway under stress. We examined the Ca2+‐regulation of this process in O2‐deprived cells. In maize root tip cells, cytosolic pH decreases sharply, from pH 7·5 to 6·9, in response to anoxia within the first 10 min, but then quickly stabilizes at 7·1 over the next 10–15 min (Saint‐Ges et al., 1991; Fox et al., 1995). One of the mechanisms proposed to revert the pH decline is the activation of proton‐consuming enzymes, such as malic enzyme or glutamate decarboxylase (Roberts et al., 1992; Sachs et al., 1996; Ratcliffe, 1997), although the actual players have not yet been clearly worked out. Our contention that [Ca]i changes could be important in the establishment of the pH‐stat was reinforced by the discovery that plant glutamate decarboxylases (GADs) have a distinct ability of interacting with calmodulin (CAM) (Snedden et al., 1995; Shelp et al., 1999). Furthermore, in many species GAD activity exhibits a sharp pH optimum of 5·8 with little activity at or near neutral pH in the absence of CAM (Shelp et al., 1999). Therefore, a pH‐ and/or CAM‐dependent activation and its significant ability to consume protons (Snedden et al., 1995) make GAD a candidate regulator of cytosolic pH under anoxia. GAD activity was in fact shown to be induced in carrot protoplasts by limiting the supply of O2 for 2 h (Carroll et al., 1994). Hence, we focused our studies on the activation of GAD as an adaptive response and a focal point of interaction between pH and calcium changes in maize roots. A rapid induction of GAD activity, as well as an increased association of this activity with CAM‐containing protein complexes, was observed in maize roots within minutes of anoxic treatment. Further more, Ca2+/CAM antagonists abolished the activity in vitro, indicating that CAM‐association may be needed for the activation of GAD under anoxia. The kinetics of GAD activation soon after the onset of anoxia coincided with the time course of pH stabilization in maize root tips reported previously (e.g. Fox et al., 1995). Genes encoding GAD have already been cloned from a number of species (Snedden et al., 1995). Several maize clones that are similar to GAD from other plant species were identified in a maize EST database (http://www.zmdb.iastate.edu/), indicating that a gene family may encode this enzyme in maize. These clones were obtained, and after confirmatory sequencing analysis were identified as putative maize GAD cDNAs. Sequence comparison indicated that GAD is encoded by at least three genes in maize (Subbaiah and Sachs, unpubl. res.). RNA gel blot analysis showed that only one of them is inducible by anoxia in maize roots and the other two are actually repressed. Furthermore, the transcript levels for the non‐inducible clones showed a greater abundance in the axis portion (1 cm away from the tip) of the primary root in 3‐d‐old seedlings (Subbaiah and Sachs, unpubl. res.). We have also examined the distribution of ESTs among various maize libraries that were made use of. The majority of hits was found in libraries that were made from young and meristematic tissues (e.g. leaf and tassel primordia, early embryo, and anthers) that are expected to be rich in mitochondria and that show intense respiratory activity (Subbaiah and Sachs, unpubl. res.).

Fine‐tuning the Ca2+ signal

Efflux transporters (transporters that remove Ca2+ from the cytoplasm) play an equally important role as influx transporters (transporters that allow Ca2+ into the cytoplasm) in Ca2+ signalling. High‐affinity transporters, such as Ca2+‐ATPases, attenuate as well as modulate stimulus‐induced Ca2+ rise. In view of the versatility of Ca2+ to transduce a number of stimuli, it is imperative that Ca2+ signals are patterned in a stimulus‐specific manner. In coordination with the influx transporters, Ca2+ pumps not only orchestrate stimulus‐specificity to Ca2+ signals but fine‐tune and propagate them (e.g. Camacho and Lechleiter, 1993). One objective of our research is to unravel Ca2+‐transporters involved in the regulation of anoxic Ca2+ signal. To this end, we have isolated a cDNA clone, CAP1, from anoxic maize roots. CAP1 encodes a Ca2+‐ATPase and is induced during the first 4–6 h of anoxia (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2000). This clone shares sequence identity with the animal Ca2+‐ATPases located on the endoplasmic reticulum (SERCAs or ER‐type calcium pumps). However, maize CAP1 differs from other ER‐type Ca2+‐pumps in that it has a calmodulin‐binding domain at its carboxy‐terminus. The CAP1 cDNA complemented yeast mutants defective in Ca2+ pumps. The CAP1 protein from yeast membranes formed a phosphorylated intermediate characteristic of Ca2+‐ATPases and supported CaM‐stimulated Ca2+ transport (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2000). Therefore, CAP1 represents a novel calcium pump that may be involved in Ca2+/CaM‐mediated signalling pathways in maize roots. The cap1 gene in maize encodes a low abundance mRNA that is induced only during early anoxia, among other abiotic stresses tested (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2000). This indicated the potential involvement of CAP1 in imparting anoxia‐specificity to the Ca2+‐signal. The low abundance of CAP1 transcripts coincided with the scarce amounts of cognate protein in maize microsomes, indicating a tight regulation of CAP1 expression. Further more, calmodulin regulation of Ca2+ transport capacity suggests the involvement of CAP1 product in attenuating cytosolic Ca2+ rise in a feedback manner during cell stimulation. A stringent regulation of Ca2+ efflux should allow the Ca2+‐dependent signalling processes to continue without the cell attaining cytotoxic levels of free Ca2+. Induction of CAP1 transcripts in maize roots only during the first few hours of anoxia indicates such a regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis in the O2‐deprived maize cells (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2000).

NOVEL GENES INVOLVED IN THE ANAEROBIC RESPONSE OR FLOODING TOLERANCE

Advances have been made in molecular‐level analyses of several cDNAs and genes involved in the anaerobic response (cf. Sachs, 1994; Sachs et al., 1996). Table 1 shows the chromosomal locations for maize genes involved in the anaerobic response, for which DNA clones were available to carry out restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping analysis (Peschke and Sachs, 1994). These genes are distributed throughout the genome (Table 1). Until recently, the only genes described in plants that are induced by oxygen deprivation (anoxia or hypoxia) encoded enzymes of glucose‐phosphate metabolism (mostly glycolysis and fermentation), and thus apparently function to allow limited energy production in the face of limited oxygen supply (Sachs, 1993, 1994; Sachs et al., 1996). We present here three newly described gene systems that appear to function outside the glycolytic pathway.

Table 1.

Chromosomal locations of maize genes involved in the anaerobic response

Gene name or clone Symbol Location
Alcohol dehydrogenase 1 adh1 1L
Alcohol dehydrogenase 2 adh2 4S
Aldolase 1 ald1 8L
Enolase 1 eno1 9S
Enolase 2 (c) eno2 1S
Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase 1 (c) gpc1 4S
Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase 2 (c) gpc2 6S
Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase 3 gpc3 4S
Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase 4 gpc4 5L
Phospho‐hexose isomerase 1 phi1 1L
Pyruvate decarboxylase 1 pdc1 8L
Pyruvate decarboxylase 2 pdc2 8
Pyruvate decarboxylase 3 pdc3 1S
Shrunken 1  sh1 9S
Sucrose synthase 1 sus1 9L
Xyloglucan endotranglycosylase 1  xet1 5S
1032 wusl1032= umc217 1S

(c) indicates constitutive member of a gene family; other members are anaerobically inducible.

Chromosomal locations are from the maize genome database (URL http://www.agron.missouri.edu).

Maize aie2 homologue

Recently, Huq and Hodges (2000) reported early activation of a rice (Oryza sativa L.) gene by anoxia (its transcript peaked after 1–3 h of anaerobic treatment); the authors named it the aie (anaerobically inducible early) gene. Using a differential display technique to identify cDNA fragments representing mRNAs that are induced within 90 min of anoxia, two cDNA fragments and one full‐length cDNA were isolated. These cDNAs represented a small gene family of two or three genes. The full‐length cDNA (belonging to the aie2 gene) encodes a novel protein (127 amino acids long) that has no similarity to any known protein in the GenBank and SwissProt databases. We searched a public database of maize ESTs (http://www. zmdb.iastate.edu/) for a homologue of rice aie2 gene and found that there are at least 11 ESTs comprising two putative contigs (TUC05‐31‐1810·1 and TUC05‐31‐10062·1). They are approx. 80 % identical to each other and >70 % similar to the rice gene at the nucleotide sequence level. However, both the maize TUCs are longer than their rice homologue. Since the initiation and termination codons are further apart in these two cDNAs, they also appear to encode a larger protein. Although confirmatory sequencing needs to be carried out, the predicted protein product is not extensively similar to any known protein in the database. Nevertheless, the putative protein shows short stretches of similarities to functionally interesting proteins (e.g. DNA‐binding proteins and nitric oxide synthase), indicating its putative involvement in signalling (Subbaiah and Sachs, unpubl. res.).

Anoxia‐tolerance gene(s) identified from the analysis of natural variation in maize

Anaerobic stress can significantly reduce survival or growth of germinating maize seedlings in waterlogged soils. The majority of maize genotypes survive up to 3 d of anaerobic treatment at 27 °C. On the other hand, mutants that are null for ADH activity only survive a few hours of anoxia. We screened several hundred inbred and exotic maize lines for their tolerance to anoxia. Nine exotic accessions showed greater tolerance to anaerobic stress, as they survived 5–6 d of anaerobic treatment at 27 °C. In addition, three inbred lines were found to be significantly less tolerant to anaerobic conditions, surviving for only 2 d (Lemke‐Keyes and Sachs, 1989b). Results of crosses between the anaerobic‐tolerant accessions with one anoxia‐sensitive inbred line (Mo20W) and a ‘normal’ inbred line (B73Ht) show that the anoxia‐tolerance trait(s) is dominant and shows very simple segregation. This indicated that only one or two genes are involved in each accession. We are presently creating anaerobic‐tolerant inbreds in order to analyse the gene(s) involved in this trait.

Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET)

Flooded maize plants, like those of many species, undergo structural changes leading to cell lysis and the formation of cortical air spaces (often referred to as aerenchyma). These spaces may facilitate gas diffusion from aerated plant parts, and as such are considered advantageous for prolonged survival in flooded soils (Drew et al., 2000). There is strong evidence indicating that formation of intercellular air spaces is promoted by accumulation of endogenous ethylene in submerged tissues (reviewed in Drew et al., 2000). Formation of aerenchyma can also be induced in well‐aerated plants that are starved of nitrogen or phosphorus, and this response is proposed to be triggered by increased sensitivity to endogenous ethylene (He et al., 1992). The formation of aerenchyma was found to be associated with increased activity of cellulase, which presumably contributes to cell lysis (Drew, 1992; Grineva and Bragina, 1993; He et al., 1994). Additional cell wall and cytoplasmic degradation enzymes are also likely to be involved in the process (Campbell and Drew, 1983; He et al., 1994). However, there is little information to date on the molecular regulation of aerenchyma formation or the identity of other enzymes involved. In maize, a flooding‐induced gene (xet1) encodes a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET1), a putative cell wall loosening enzyme (Peschke and Sachs, 1994; Saab and Sachs, 1995, 1996). O2 deprivation induces expression of XET1 in the primary root, mesocotyl, and coleoptile of maize seedlings. The induction of xet1 appears to be specific to O2 deprivation, since other stresses do not induce the gene (Peschke and Sachs, 1994). The xet1 gene appears to be a member of a large multigene family in which only xet1 is inducible by oxygen deprivation. The induction of xet1 by hypoxia was associated with aerenchyma development and, like aerenchyma, XET1 transcript was induced by ethylene. Hypoxic induction of XET mRNA is repressed by ethylene antagonists [(aminooxy)acetic acid, 2‐aminoethoxyvinyl‐glycine, AgNO3]. XET1 is also induced under aerobic conditions by exogenous ethylene, as is aerenchyma. This differs from ADH1, which is also induced by hypoxia but in an ethylene‐independent manner in maize (Saab and Sachs, 1996). Taken together, xet1 appears to be involved in flooding‐induced cell wall metabolism leading to aerenchyma development.

We are presently exploring the potential role of maize xet1 in flooding‐induced cell structural changes, such as tissue deformation, cell lysis, and aerenchyma formation. XET1 cDNA was expressed in Esherichia coli and the recombinant protein was tested for XET activity. The results show that xet1 does encode a functional XET enzyme. However, when total extractable XET levels are measured in maize roots under aerobic and hypoxic conditions, no significant difference is detected (Saab and Sachs, unpubl. res.). This can be explained by a differential induction or repression of individual members of the xet gene family under O2 deprivation, resulting in no net increase in XET activity. Our current focus is to determine if the XET1 gene product specifically co‐localizes to those cortical cell layers where aerenchyma is formed.

LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION: POST‐TRANSLATIONAL REGULATION OF SUCROSE SYNTHASE UNDER ANOXIA

One common mechanism that cells use to rapidly decipher and amplify the [Ca]i changes is reversible protein phosphorylation (for a review, see Stone and Walker, 1995). Addition or removal of phosphate can lead to changes in the activation status, catalytic activity, or cellular localization of effector proteins (e.g. Kim et al., 1994; Huber and Huber, 1996). These changes can, in turn, lead to transient alterations in gene expression and metabolism or even long‐lasting modifications in the plant form and function (e.g. Ferreira et al., 1993; Maurel et al., 1995; Stone et al., 1998; Fankhauser et al., 1999).

We have recently shown that an anaerobically induced polypeptide, sucrose synthase 1 (SH1), is post‐translationally regulated by phosphorylation, and this regulation is among the early responses that culminate in the death of the primary root tip in anoxic maize seedlings (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). Sucrose synthase (SS) is a unique enzyme with an ability to mobilize sucrose into diverse pathways that are critical in structural (e.g. cellulose or callose biosynthesis), storage (starch synthesis) and metabolic (e.g. glycolysis) functions of plant cells (e.g. Ruan et al., 1997). It is encoded by two genes in maize, sh1 (encoding SH1) and sus1 (encoding SUS1). The sh1 gene is expressed mostly in the developing endosperm, while sus1 is expressed in many plant parts including the aleurone and basal part of the developing endosperm. The sh1 gene is induced by anoxia both at transcriptional and translational levels (ANP87; Springer et al., 1986). The sus1 gene is only mildly induced by anoxia. Although the double mutants in SS have been shown to be less tolerant to anoxia (Ricard et al., 1998), the contribution of SH1, i.e. the anoxia‐inducible isoform, to anoxia tolerance had not previously been examined. Our results indicate that the differential regulation of the two genes at transcriptional and translational levels extends into the post‐translational level, with potent effects on adaptation to anoxia and endosperm development (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001).

Analysis of Ca2+‐dependent changes in protein phosphorylation under anoxia indicated that the SH1 isoform of sucrose synthase was phosphorylated at increased rates in maize roots subjected to 2 h of anoxia. In contrast, during prolonged anoxia the protein was under‐phosphorylated, and by 48 h most of the protein existed in an unphosphorylated form. In seedlings submerged for 2 h or more, a part of the SH1 became associated with the microsomal fraction (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). The membrane localization of SH1 increased with the duration of anoxia, but was confined only to the root tip. This preceded an extensive induction of callose and other symptoms of root tip death (e.g. induction of nuclear DNA breakage; Subbaiah and Sachs, unpubl. res.). Consistent with the Ca2+ dependence of SS phosphorylation (e.g. Huber et al., 1996), addition of EGTA (ethylene glycol tetra acetic acid) to the submergence buffer led to an increased dephosphorylation as well as membrane localization of SH1 and greater callose accumulation. On the other hand, Ca2+ addition decreased the proportion of membrane‐bound SH1 and callose deposits (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). Thus, these results corroborated two earlier observations: (1) that sucrose synthase is functionally associated with glucan synthases in the plasma membrane (Amor et al., 1995); and (2) the phosphorylation status of SS may determine its partitioning between soluble and membrane fractions (Winter et al., 1997). Furthermore, our genetic analysis suggested that this response was isoform‐specific in that sh1 mutants, maintained SS phosphorylation and had low amounts of callose deposits in the root tip even under prolonged anoxia. This correlated with the superior anoxia tolerance of sh1 mutants to that of the non‐mutants (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001). Our studies thus indicate a functional divergence of SS isoforms due to a differential post‐translational regulation, in that SUS1, existing mostly as a soluble form, may supply hexoses to glycolysis, while SH1, being distributed in both soluble and membrane fractions, contributes to the biosynthesis of cell wall polymers as well. Such a dichotomy is also consistent with the proposed roles of SS isoforms in the developing maize endosperm (see Chourey et al., 1998).

HYPOXIA‐INDUCED AERENCHYMA OR ANOXIA‐INDUCED ROOT TIP DEATH: REGULATED CELL DEATH AS A MEANS OF SURVIVAL UNDER OXYGEN DEPRIVATION

The essence of stress adaptation is redirecting scarce resources to the maintenance of essential sinks as well as activation of adaptive pathways, while disinvesting in non‐essential sinks and pathways. Being endowed with multiple growing points, plants have a unique ability to eliminate superfluous tissues/organs under stress and regenerate them if favourable conditions demand. O2‐deprived maize roots exhibit two such regulated cell or tissue‐death pathways. These two pathways are clearly distinct in their regulation as well as in the location of their occurrence in the root.

As alluded to in the previous section, inner cortical cell layers of the primary or nodal roots are selectively killed under hypoxia (i.e. under partial submergence when only the roots were submerged), leading to aerenchyma formation. This selective cell death not only reduces the demand for O2 but, more importantly, enhances root porosity and facilitates oxygen diffusion from the exposed plant parts into the submerged ones. Aerenchyma formation requires the presence of oxygen and occurs 3–4 cm behind the tip (He et al., 1992). This allows the root tip to adapt to the localized anoxia (Gibbs et al., 1995), and prolongs the survival of seedlings. The nature and regulation of cell death during aerenchyma formation have been the subject of recent studies (He et al., 1992; Drew et al., 2000; Gunavardena et al., 2001). These studies indicate that aerenchyma formation occurs by a genetically programmed cell death (PCD) (reviewed in Drew et al., 2000). Cytohistological data, however, indicate that the hypoxically induced PCD does not entirely follow the canonical apoptic pathway of animal cells, but partly resembles the cytoplasmic or necrotic death (Gunavardena et al., 2001).

Root‐tip death

Under complete submergence, maize seedlings exhibit another cell death process that also appears to have an adaptive significance. Although prolonged anoxia ultimately kills the entire seedling, different tissues of an individual plant differ in their tolerance (Johnson et al., 1989; Ellis et al., 1999). Maize root tips that are not hypoxically acclimated are very sensitive to anoxia and die within a few hours (Roberts et al., 1984; Johnson et al., 1989). Root tips are composed of tightly packed tissues with few, if any, intercellular spaces, and hence suffer from restricted gaseous diffusion. Consequently, in flooded seedlings, root tip death may be a natural consequence of oxygen starvation and the attendant repression of substrate transport. Considerable attention has been paid to strategies/mechanisms that prolong the anoxia tolerance of the primary root tip in young maize seedlings, as the tip of the primary root is considered to be very important for seedling establishment (for a review, see Drew et al., 1994). On the other hand, we proposed that under severe anoxia, when energy generation is extremely limiting, the loss of metabolically intensive tissues such as the root tip might prolong the survival of the shoot and the root axis. The facilitated survival of these two organs during submergence may increase the chances of seedling recovery after reoxygenation. We have recently tested this proposal, and results indicate that the root tip does indeed act as a dispensable and non‐functional sink in anoxic seedlings (Subbaiah et al, 2000; Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001).

The time course of primary root tip death in submerged maize seedlings was followed using the post‐anoxic development of visible necrotic symptoms and uptake of Evans Blue as criteria. Anoxia for 48 h or more led to the death of the root tip (Subbaiah et al., 2000). If the seedlings were reaerated prior to 48 h, root tip death did not occur. However, cell death indicators such as callose development, DNA nicking, and induction of hydrolytic activities were observed to occur much earlier than 48 h (Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001; unpubl. res.). These observations indicated that the death process, although initiated before 24 h, became irreversible at 48 h of anoxia. The necrosis extended into the root axis during post‐anoxic recovery, leading to the mortality of 30–50 % of the seedlings. Excision of the root tip (de‐tipping) before anoxia led to a 30–40 % greater recovery of seedlings from stress injury. In contrast to the slow and progressive death of root tips in intact seedlings, de‐tipped seedlings showed less shoot and root damage, resulting in a rapid emergence of leaves as well as lateral roots after reaeration (Subbaiah et al., 2000). Our data also indicate that the dying root tip of intact seedlings releases diffusible death‐inducing factors into the submergence buffer, as indicated by the acceleration of seedling death when submergence buffer was reused. Preliminary analysis indicates that these factors are proteinaceous in nature (Subbaiah et al., 1999; unpubl. res.). Therefore, a reprogramming of root tip death so that it occurs early during anoxia may provide a definite adaptive advantage to maize seedlings to anoxic stress. In arabidopsis, the whole root system is dispensable for hypoxic tolerance of the seedlings; in fact, de‐rooted seedlings fared better under O2 deprivation (Ellis et al., 1999). In maize, the primary root axis is helpful (in quickly generating a functional root system), if not essential, for the post‐anoxic recovery of seedlings. However, the survival of the shoot meristem is critical for the post‐anoxic regrowth and autotrophic life of the seedling.

Anoxia‐induced protease (AIP) in root tip death

To identify potential regulators of the cell death process, changes in protease activities were analysed in the root tissues. Cysteine and serine proteases have been implicated in the cell death/injury induced by abiotic, biotic or developmental signals in plants (e.g. Williams et al., 1994; Stroeher et al., 1997; Solomon et al., 1999; for a review see Hadfield and Bennett, 1997).

Different species of proteases, both soluble and membrane‐bound, are induced or suppressed during different durations of anoxic stress and reoxygenation in roots of 3‐d‐old dark‐grown maize seedlings (Subbaiah et al., 2000). The major aerobic proteases are suppressed after 6 h of anoxia and new enzymes are detected both in soluble and membrane fractions. Upon reoxygenation, the aerobic activities reappear and the anoxic enzymes persist for at least 24 h after seedlings are reaerated. We observed a soluble enzyme that became detectable after 12 h of anoxia. This enzyme increases with time and accounts for the major proteolytic activity in roots of seedlings submerged for 48 h (Subbaiah et al., 2000). Protein synthesis inhibitor studies show that this is a newly synthesized enzyme under anoxia (anoxia‐induced protease: AIP). AIP activity runs as a 22–25 kDa complex in SDS–PAGE. Ca2+ is required for the renaturation and proteolytic activity of the enzyme, and inhibitor sensitivities indicated that AIP is a cysteine protease. De‐tipping caused a decrease in AIP activity. Thus, the appearance of AIP activity in the root tip before 24 h of submergence was spatially and temporally associated with the initiation of the root tissue death (Subbaiah et al., 2000).

In addition to AIP activity, XET1 mRNA is also induced in maize roots by anoxia (apparently by a different mechanism than its hypoxic induction; Saab and Sachs, 1996) and may be involved in the root‐tip death process. Besides its proposed role in cell wall loosening in growing tissues, XET is associated with cell wall hydrolysis and cell lysis. For example, increased XET activity was shown to have a temporal correlation with ethylene‐induced fruit ripening and softening (Redgwell and Fry, 1993).

Root tip death under anoxia: programmed cell death or necrosis?

Cell death is a basic biological process important in the regulated development of multicellular organisms and in their responses to stress. Animal cells show two fundamentally different modes of death, namely apoptosis (or PCD) and necrosis. The most relevant distinction between the two types of death is the early preservation of membrane integrity in apoptosis, whereas a rapid release of intracellular constituents occurs in the case of necrosis. Therefore, necrosis can presumably be dangerous, while an apoptic response is an adaptive mechanism to dispose of cells without compromising the rest of the organism. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence that apoptosis and necrosis just represent extreme ends of a wide range of possible morphological and biochemical deaths. Root‐tip death is preceded by SH1 relocation, DNA nicking, and induction of AIP and callose, indicating that the process, to some extent, is autonomous (and a programmed event; Subbaiah et al., 2000; Subbaiah and Sachs, 2001; unpubl. res.). On the other hand, the death of root tip cells is accompanied by acidification of the cytosol (Roberts et al., 1984) as well as the external medium, and an extracellular release of diffusible cytotoxins (Subbaiah et al., 1999; unpubl. res.). Therefore, in nature, root tip death may be a less cell‐autonomous process but more of a necrotic process. Our de‐tipping experiments suggest that an acceleration of the process as well as making it more cell‐autonomous (i.e. pushing the process more towards PCD) would provide a definite advantage during post‐anoxic recovery of maize seedlings. Indeed, some maize genotypes appear to have evolved an accelerated root tip death as a genetically controlled flooding tolerance mechanism (Zeng et al., 1999).

CONCLUSIONS

Anoxia is one of the most important abiotic stresses encountered by most higher organisms. The anaerobic stress‐response of maize offers an opportunity to characterize the regulatory components of a family of 20 genes that are coordinately expressed. The anaerobically induced proteins appear to be encoded by a set of genes whose expression is stimulated by a deprivation of oxygen, a condition that would occur in nature during flooding. Regulation of protein synthesis under anaerobiosis appears to occur at multiple levels. We have characterized several genes involved in the anaerobic response and provided some insight into a few components of the signal transduction pathway. Our goal has been to understand how maize perceives the changes in external O2 concentration and adapts its growth and metabolism over the short‐ and long‐term. To this end, we have demonstrated that Ca2+ acts as a key transducer of changes in O2 availability. Additionally, we aim to characterize the promotor elements of the anaerobically induced genes as well as the signalling components down‐stream to calcium that trigger gene induction.

Our goal is also to isolate and characterize the genes involved in tolerance to anaerobic stress and to determine the molecular mechanisms. We have begun analysing genes that confer increased flooding and anaerobic tolerance in maize. This trait was found in some exotic maize accessions (Lemke‐Keyes and Sachs, 1989a). Genetic analysis indicates that tolerance is a fairly simple dominant trait. Additionally, we found a recessive factor that increases anaerobic tolerance in plants that are null for ADH activity (Lemke‐Keyes and Sachs, 1989b). We have also demonstrated how a simple post‐translational modification of sucrose synthase by the addition/removal of phosphate can lead to potent changes in the tolerance of seedlings to anoxia. Our discovery of genes and proteins likely to be involved in structural modifications (aerenchyma formation and root tip death) indicate further that these mechanisms are multi‐pronged and multi‐component, perhaps tailored to adapt to different levels of stress. We will continue our analyses of maize responses to anaerobiosis at several levels using a variety of approaches. Our long‐term objective is to elucidate the mechanisms of plant adaptation to abiotic stresses and also to pave the way for the development of stress‐tolerant crops.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and by grant 95‐37100‐1563 and grant 96‐35100‐3143 from the US Department of Agriculture, National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program.

Supplementary Material

Content Snapshot

Received: 6 August 2001; Returned for revision: 20 November 2001; Accepted: 16 January 2002

References

  1. AmorY, Haigler C, Johnson S, Wainscott M, Delmer DP.1995. A membrane‐associated form of sucrose synthase and its potential role in synthesis of cellulose and callose in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92: 9353–9357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey‐SerresJ, Dawe K.1996. Both 5′ and 3′ sequences of maize ADH1 mRNA are required for enhanced translation under low‐oxygen conditions. Plant Physiology 112: 685–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey‐SerresJ, Freeling M.1990. Hypoxic stress‐induced changes in ribosomes of maize seedling roots. Plant Physiology 94: 1237–1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey‐SerresJ, Kloeckener‐Gruissem B, Freeling M.1988. Genetic and molecular approaches to the study of the anaerobic response and tissue specific gene expression in maize. Plant, Cell and Environment 11: 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  5. BushDS.1995. Calcium regulation in plant cells and its role in signaling.Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 103: 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  6. BuwaldaF, Thompson CJ, Steigner W, Barrett‐Lennard EG, Gibbs J, Greenway H.1988. Hypoxia induces membrane depolarization and potassium loss from wheat roots but does not increase their permeability to sorbitol. Journal of Experimental Botany 39: 1169–1183. [Google Scholar]
  7. CamachoP, Lechleiter JD.1993. Increased frequency of calcium waves in Xenopus laevis oocytes that express a calcium ATPase. Science 260: 226–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CampbellR, Drew MC.1983. Electron microscopy of gas space (aerenchyma) formation in adventitious roots of Zea mays L. subjected to oxygen shortage. Planta 157: 350–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CarrollAD, Fox GG, Laurie S, Phillips R, Ratcliffe RG, Stewart GR.1994. Ammonium assimilation and the role of γ‐aminobutyric acid in pH homeostasis in carrot cell suspensions. Plant Physiology 106: 513–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ChangWWP, Huang L, Shen M, Webster C, Burlingame AL., Roberts JKM.2000. Patterns of protein synthesis and tolerance of anoxia in root tips of maize seedlings acclimated to a low‐oxygen environment, and identification of proteins by mass spectrometry. Plant Physiology 122: 295–318. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ChoureyPS, Taliercio EW, Carlson SJ, Ruan Y‐L.1998. Genetic evidence that the two isozymes of sucrose synthase present in developing maize endosperm are critical, one for cell wall integrity and the other for starch biosynthesis. Molecular General Genetics 259: 88–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DennisES, Walker JC, Llewellyn DJ, Ellis JG, Singh K, Tokuhisa JG, Wolstenholme DR, Peacock WJ.1989. The response to anaerobic stress: transcriptional regulation of genes for anaerobically induced proteins. In: Cherry JH, ed. Environmental stress in plants New York: Springer, 231–245.
  13. DeVettenNC, Ferl RJ.1995. Characterization of a maize G‐box binding factor that is induced by hypoxia. Plant Journal 7: 589–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DrewMC.1992. Soil aeration and plant root metabolism. Soil Science 154: 259–268. [Google Scholar]
  15. DrewMC, Jackson MB, Giffard S.1979. Ethylene‐promoted adventitious rooting and development of cortical air spaces (aerenchyma) in roots may be adaptive responses to flooding in Zea mays L. Planta 147: 83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DrewMC, Saglio PH, Pradet A.1985. Larger adenylate energy charge and ATP/ADP ratios in aerenchymatous roots of Zea mays in anaerobic media as a consequence of improved internal oxygen transport. Planta 165: 51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. DrewMC, Cobb BG, Johnson JR, Andrews D, Morgan PW, Jordan W, He CJ.1994. Metabolic acclimation of root tips to oxygen deficiency. Annals of Botany 74: 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  18. DrewMC, He C‐J, Morgan PW.2000. Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation in roots. Trends in Plant Science 5: 123–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. EllisMH, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ.1999.Arabidopsis roots and shoots have different mechanisms for hypoxic tolerance. Plant Physiology 119: 57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. FankhauserC, Yeh K‐C, Lagarias JC, Zhang H, Elic TD, Chory J.1999. PKS1, a substrate phosphorylated by phytochrome that modulates light signaling in Arabidopsis Science 284: 1539–1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. FasanoJM, Swanson SJ, Blancaflor EB, Dowd PE, Kao TH, Gilroy S.2001. Changes in root cap pH are required for the gravity response of the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 13: 907–921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. FerlRJ, Brennan M, Schwartz D.1980. In vitro translation of maize ADH: evidence for the anaerobic induction of mRNA. Molecular General Genetics 18: 681–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. FerreiraPC, Hemerly AS, Van Montagu M.1993. A protein phosphatase 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana restores temperature sensitivity of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc25ts/wee1 double mutant. Plant Journal 4: 81–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. FoxGG, McCallan NR, Ratcliffe RG.1995. Manipulating cytoplasmic pH under anoxia: a critical test of the role of pH in the switch from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism. Planta 195: 324–330. [Google Scholar]
  25. FreelingM.1973. Simultaneous induction by anaerobiosis or 2,4‐D of multiple enzymes specified by two unlinked genes: differential Adh1‐Adh2 expression in maize. Molecular and General Genetics 127: 215–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. GibbsJ, de Bruxelle D, Armstrong W, Greenway H.1995. Evidence for anoxic zones in 2–3 mm tips of aerenchymatous maize roots under low O2 supply. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 723–730. [Google Scholar]
  27. GrinevaGM, Bragina TV.1993. Formation of adaptations to flooding in corn. Soviet Plant Physiology 40: 583–587. [Google Scholar]
  28. GunavardenaAHLAN, Pearce DM, Jackson MB, Hawes CR, Evans DE.2001. Characterization of programmed cell death during aerenchyma formation induced by ethylene or hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Planta 212: 205–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. HadfieldKA, Bennett AB.1997. Programmed senescence of plant organs. Cell Death and Differentiation 4: 662–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. HeC‐J, Morgan PW, Drew MC.1992. Enhanced sensitivity to ethylene in nitrogen‐ or phosphate‐starved roots of Zea mays L. during aerenchyma formation. Plant Physiology 98: 137–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. HeC‐J, Drew MC, Morgan PW.1994. Induction of enzymes associated with lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of Zea mays during hypoxia or nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiology 105: 861–865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. HuberJLA, Huber SC.1996. Role and regulation of sucrose‐phosphate synthase in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47: 431–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. HuberSC, Huber JL, Liao PC, Gage DA, McMichael RW, Jr, Chourey PS, Hannah LC, Kock K.1996. Phosphorylation of serine‐15 of maize leaf sucrose synthase. Occurrence in vivo and possible regulatory significance. Plant Physiology 112: 793–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. HuqE, Hodges TK.2000. An anaerobically inducible early (aie) gene family from rice. Plant Molecular Biology 40: 591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. JohnsonJ, Cobb BG, Drew MC.1989. Hypoxic induction of anoxia tolerance in root tips of Zea mays Plant Physiology 91: 837–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. KelleyPM.1989. Maize pyruvate decarboxylase mRNA is induced anaerobically. Plant Molecular Biology 13: 213–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. KelleyPM, Freeling M.1984. Anaerobic expression of maize glucose phosphate isomerase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 259: 673–677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. KelleyPM, Tolan DR.1986. The complete amino acid sequence for the anaerobically induced aldolase from maize derived from cDNA clones. Plant Physiology 82: 1076–1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. KennedyRA, Rumpho ME, Fox TC.1992. Anaerobic metabolism in plants. Plant Physiology 84: 1204–1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. KimJ, Blackshear PJ, Johnson JD, McLaughlin S.1994. Phosphorylation reverses the membrane association of peptides that correspond to the basic domains of MARCKS and neuromodulin. Biophysics Journal 67: 227–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. KnightH, Trewavas AJ, Knight MR.1996. Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis involved two cellular pools and a change in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell 8: 489–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. LalSK, Lee C, Sachs MM.1998. Differential regulation of enolase during anaerobiosis in maize. Plant Physiology 118: 1285–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. LaszloA, St Lawrence P.1983. Parallel induction and synthesis of PDC and ADH in anoxic maize roots. Molecular and General Genetics 192: 110–117. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lemke‐KeyesCA, Sachs MM.1989a Anaerobic tolerant null: a mutant that allows Adh1 nulls to survive anaerobic treatment. Journal of Heredity 80: 316–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lemke‐KeyesCA, Sachs MM1989b Genetic variation for seedling tolerance to anaerobic stress in maize germplasm. Maydica 34: 329–337. [Google Scholar]
  46. ManjunathS, Sachs MM.1997. Molecular characterization and promoter analysis of the maize cytosolic glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase gene family and its expression during anoxia. Plant Molecular Biology 33: 97–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. ManjunathS, Williams AJ, Bailey‐Serres J.1999. Oxygen deprivation stimulates Ca2+‐mediated phosphorylation of mRNA cap‐binding protein eIF4E in maize roots. Plant Journal 19: 21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. MaurelC, Kado RT, Guern J, Chrispeels MJ.1995. Phosphorylation regulates the water channel activity of the seed‐specific aquaporin α‐tip. EMBO Journal 14: 3028–3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. PaulA‐L, Ferl RJ.1991. Adh1 and Adh2 regulation. Maydica 36: 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  50. Perez‐MendezA, Aguilar R, Briones E, Sanchez De JE.1993. Characterization of ribosomal protein phosphorylation in maize axes during germination. Plant Science 94: 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  51. PeschkeVM, Sachs MM.1994. Characterization and expression of anaerobically induced maize transcripts. Plant Physiology 104: 387–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. RatcliffeRG.1997. In vivo NMR studies of the metabolic responses of plant tissues to anoxia. Annals of Botany 79 (Suppl. A): 39–48.
  53. RedgwellRJ, Fry SC.1993. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase activity increases during kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) ripening. Plant Physiology 103: 1399–1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. RicardB, Van Toai T, Chourey P, Saglio P.1998. Evidence for the critical role of sucrose synthase for anoxic tolerance of maize roots using a double mutant. Plant Physiology 116: 1323–1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. RobertsJKM, Callis J, Wemmer D, Walbot V, Jardetzky O.1984. Mechanism of cytoplasmic pH regulation in hypoxic maize root tips and its role in survival under hypoxia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 81: 3379–3383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. RobertsJKM,Hooks MA, Miaullis AP, Edwards S, Webster C.1992. Contribution of malate and amino acid metabolism to cytoplasmic pH regulation in hypoxic maize root tips studied using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Plant Physiology 98: 480–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. RowlandLJ, Strommer JN.1986. Anaerobic treatment of maize roots affects transcription of Adh1 and transcript stability. Molecular Cellular Biology 6: 3368–3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. RuanY‐L, Chourey PS, Delmer, DP, Perez‐Grau L.1997. The differential expression of sucrose synthase in relation to diverse patterns of carbon partitioning in developing cotton seed. Plant Physiology 115: 375–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. RussellDA, Sachs MM.1989. Differential expression and sequence analysis of the maize glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase gene family. Plant Cell 1: 793–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. RussellDA, Sachs MM.1991. The maize glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase gene family: organ‐specific expression and genetic analysis. Molecular General Genetics 229: 219–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. RussellDA, Sachs MM.1992. Protein synthesis in maize during anaerobic and heat stress. Plant Physiology 99: 615–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. SaabIN, Sachs MM.1995. Complete cDNA and genomic sequence encoding a flooding‐responsive gene from maize (Zea mays L.) homologous to xyloglucan endotransglycosylase. Plant Physiology 108: 439–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. SaabIN, Sachs MM.1996. A flooding‐induced xyloglucan endo‐transglycosylase homolog in maize is responsive to ethylene and associated with aerenchyma. Plant Physiology 112: 385–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. SachsMM.1993. Molecular genetic basis of metabolic adaptation to anoxia in maize and its possible utility for improving tolerance of crops to soil waterlogging. In: Jackson MB, Black CR, eds. Interacting stresses on plants in a changing environment NATO ASI Series, Vol. 16. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 375–393.
  65. SachsMM.1994. Gene expression in maize during anoxia. In: Basra AS, ed. Stress induced gene expression in plants Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers, 87–102.
  66. SachsMM, Freeling M, Okimoto R.1980. The anaerobic proteins of maize. Cell 20: 761–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. SachsMM, Subbaiah CC, Saab IN.1996. Anaerobic gene expression and flooding tolerance in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  68. Saint‐GesV, Roby C, Bligny R, Pradet A, Douce R.1991. Kinetic studies of the variations of cytoplasmic pH, nucleotide triophosphates (31P‐NMR) and lactate during normoxic and anoxic transitions in maize root tips. European Journal of Biochemistry 200: 477–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. SandersD, Brownlee C, Harper JF.1999. Communicating with calcium. Plant Cell 11: 691–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. ShelpBJ, Bown AW, McLean MD.1999. Metabolism and functions of gamma‐aminobutyric acid. Trends in Plant Science 4: 446–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. SneddenWA, Arazi T, Fromm H, Shelp BJ.1995. Calcium/calmodulin regulation of soybean glutamate decarboxylase. Plant Physiology 108: 543–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. SolomonM, Belenghi B, Delledonne M, Menachem E, Levine A.1999. The involvement of cysteine proteases and protease inhibitor genes in the regulation of programmed cell death in plants. Plant Cell 11: 431–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. SpringerB, Werr W, Starlinger P, Bennett DC, Zokolica M, Freeling M.1986. The shrunken gene on chromosome 9 of Zea mays L. is expressed in various plant tissues and encodes an anaerobic protein. Molecular General Genetics 205: 461–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. StoneJM, Walker JC. 1995 Plant protein kinase families and signal transduction. Plant Physiology 108: 451–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. StoneJM, Trotochaud AE, Walker JC, Clark SE.1998. Control of meristem development by CLAVATA1 receptor kinase and kinase‐associated protein phosphatase interactions. Plant Physiology 117: 1217–1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. StroeherVL, Maclagan JL, Good AG.1997. Molecular cloning of a Brassica napus cysteine protease gene inducible by drought and low temperature stress. Physiologia Plantarum 101: 389–397. [Google Scholar]
  77. SubbaiahCC, Sachs MM.2000. Maize cap1 encodes a novel SERCA‐type calcium ATPase with a calmodulin‐binding domain. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275: 21678–21687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. SubbaiahCC, Sachs MM.2001. Altered patterns of sucrose synthase phosphorylation and localization precede callose induction and root tip death in anoxic maize seedlings. Plant Physiology 125: 585–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. SubbaiahCC, Bush DS, Sachs MM.1994a Elevation of cytosolic calcium precedes anoxic gene expression in maize suspension cultured cells. Plant Cell 6: 1747–1762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. SubbaiahCC, Zhang J, Sachs MM.1994b Involvement of intracellular calcium in anaerobic gene expression and survival of maize seedlings. Plant Physiology 105: 369–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. SubbaiahCC, Bush DS, Sachs MM.1998. Mitochondrial contribution to the anoxic Ca2+ signal in maize suspension‐cultured cells. Plant Physiology 118: 759–771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. SubbaiahCC, Kollipara K, Sachs MM.1999. Potential involvement of maize AIP in the anoxia‐induced death of the root tip. Abstracts of 39th Annual Maize Genetic Conference, Lake Geneva, WI, 98.
  83. SubbaiahCC, Kollipara K, Sachs MM.2000. A Ca2+‐dependent cysteine protease is associated with anoxia‐induced root tip death in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 721–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. SuszkiwJ.1994. After the flood – satellites show damage to midwest farmlands. Agricultural Research 42: 20–21. [Google Scholar]
  85. VogelJ, Freeling M.1992. An anaerobic gene, which encodes an apparently non‐glycolytic protein, shares sequence homology with Mu1·7 and Mu related sequence‐A. Maize Genetics Co‐operation Newsletter 66: 21–22. [Google Scholar]
  86. WebsterC, Gaut RL, Browning KS, Ravel JM, Roberts JKM.1991. Hypoxia enhances phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A in maize root tips. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266: 23341–23346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. WignarajahK, Greenway H.1976. Effect of anaerobiosis on activities of alcohol dehydrogenase and pyruvate decarboxylase in roots of Zea mays New Phytologist 77: 575–584. [Google Scholar]
  88. WilliamsJ, Bulman M, Huttly A, Phillips A, Neil S.1994. Characterization of a cDNA from Arabidoposis thaliana encoding a potential thiol protease whose expression is induced independently by wilting and abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology 25: 259–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. WinterH, Huber J, Huber SC.1997. Membrane association of sucrose synthase: changes during the graviresponse and possible control by protein phosphorylation. FEBS Letters 420: 151–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. ZengY, Avigne WT, Koch KE.1999. Rapid repression of maize invertase by low oxygen. Invertase/sucrose synthase balance, sugar signaling potential and seedling survival. Plant Physiology 121: 599–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Content Snapshot

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES