Abstract
It has been identified that a TEV protease (TEVp) variant, TEVp5M, displays improved solubility. Here, we constructed fifteen TEVp5M variants with one or more of six rare arginine codons in the coding sequence replaced with abundant E. coli arginine codons. These codon variants expressed in either E. coli BL21 (DE3) or Rossetta (DE3) showed different solubility and activity. Supply of rare tRNAs increased the tendency of certain codon variants to form insoluble aggregates at early induction stage, as determined by the fused S-tag. About 32% increase in soluble protein production of M5 variant with four synonymously mutated arginine codons was identified in Rossetta (DE3) cells using GFP fusion reporter, comparable to that of TEVp5M. After purification, two other codon variants from both E. coli strains exhibited less activity than TEVp5M on cleaving the native or modified recognition sequence incorporated between GST and E. coli diaminopropionate ammonialyase by enzyme-coupled assay, whereas purified M5 variant showed activity similar to the TEVp5M. Supply of rare tRNAs caused the decrease of activity of TEVp5M and M5 by about 21%. Our results revealed that engineering of highly soluble TEVp variants can be achieved by the combined mutations of amino acid residues and optimization of specific rare codons, whereas simple augment of rare tRNAs abundance resulted in partial loss of activity.
Introduction
As the host, Escherichia coli is fundamentally important in the manufacture of a wide range of biotechnological and biomedical products, owing to its easy culture, fast growth, simple fermentation and easy genetic manipulation [1]. High production of recombinant protein in E. coli is a combination of several factors such as efficiency of transcription, mRNA stability, mRNA folding, codon usage, protein solubility and folding [2]. So, the strategies for optimizing expression greatly vary from gene to gene and are often determined by trial and error.
In E. coli, tRNA levels for rare codons AGG, AGA, AUA, CCC, CUA and GGA restrain high-level production of the recombinant proteins [3]. Codon optimization could enhance soluble protein production [4],[5], but sometimes it also impaired protein folding and decreased activity [6],[7]. Similarly, supply of deficient tRNAs increased expression levels of recombinant proteins, but decreased soluble production of some recombinant proteins [8]. So far, obtaining well-folded recombinant proteins with high yield remains a major challenge, as yield, solubility and conformational quality of soluble proteins could not be simultaneously optimized in E. coli [9].
Fusion tags are frequently applied for improving protein solubility and facilitating rapid purification by affinity chromatography. To avoid potential interference with biological activity or crystallization, the fused tags need to be removed, which is often achieved by a specific protease that recognizes and cleaves the engineered sequence between the tag and target protein [10]. Tobacco etch virus protease (TEVp) has been identified as a tool, owing to its stringent recognition sequence. Production of wild type TEVp or the mutant TEVpS219V with inhibition of auto-cleavage in E. coli is limited due to its low solubility [10]. Previously, we developed a novel method for quantitatively measuring in vivo and in vitro activity of TEVp using a designed fusion protein as substrate [11], and engineered a variant of TEVp (TEVp5M) with five mutated amino acid residues that displayed improved protein solubility and thermo-stability [12].
There are six rare arginine codons (R49, R50, R80, R101, R105 and R159) in the TEVp coding sequence. With the assistance of solubility enhancer maltose-binding protein (MBP), a TEVp variant with the synonymous mutations of rare codons for R49 and R50 is found to display an enhanced soluble production in E. coli BL21(DE3) [13]. Here, we further demonstrated that synonymous mutations of rare arginine codons and increment of rare tRNAs affected protein production and quality of TEVp5M.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids and reagents
E. coli strains DH5α, BL21(DE3), BL21(DE3)plysS and Rosetta(DE3), the plasmids pETDuet-1 and pET-22b, and the FRETWorks S-tag Assay Kit were purchased from Novagen (Madison, WI). Reagents used in plasmid construction, protein expression, and site-directed mutagenesis were bought from Takara (Dalian, China). The affinity matrix nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) superflow is a product of Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA). The YM-10 membrane was supplied by Amicon (USA). Pyridoxal 5′-phosphate and DL-α,β-diaminopropionate (DL-DAP) were from Sigma (USA). DNA sequencing was performed by Invitrogen (Shanghai, China).
Site-directed mutagenesis and plasmids construction
The plasmids such as pET28-TEVp5M, pET28-GFP and pGST-DAL were constructed previously [12]. Synonymous mutations of the six arginine codons in TEVp5M coding sequence were conducted by PCR amplification, using pET28-TEVp5M as the template. The primers were listed in supplementary Table S1. Each mutated gene was cut with Nco I and Xho I, and inserted into Nco I/Sal I sites of pET28-GFP plasmid. The mutated gene encoding M3 or M10 variant was also inserted into Nco I/Xho I sites of pETDuet-1 vector. The inserted gene in pGST-DAL plasmid encodes the fusion protein GST-tevS1-DAL containing His6-tagged GST, a natural TEVp cleavage site and E. coli diaminopropionate ammonia-lyase (DAL). Two amino acid residues glycine and serine in the TEVp recognition sequence ENLYFQ-GS were replaced by aspartic acid and glycine. The fusion protein containing the modified TEVp recognition sequence was named as GST-tevS2-DAL. The sequence ENLYFQ-DG is weakly recognized by TEVp [14]. All the mutations were identified by DNA sequencing.
Detection of the recombinant proteins
Except where noted, production and extraction of recombinant proteins in this study were conducted as follows. E. coli BL21(DE3) cells expressing the TEVp5M or codon variant were cultured overnight at 37°C in 5 ml of Luria–Bertani (LB) medium, diluted to 5-fold and grown at 37°C. When OD600 reached about 0.5, cells were induced by 0.5 mM of IPTG. After culturing at 28°C for 12 h, cells in 5 ml of LB medium were collected by centrifugation and disrupted in 0.8 ml of buffer A (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl). Pellets were washed three times with buffer A, solubilized by 0.2 ml of 8 M urea, and centrifuged to remove the precipitants. About 40 µg and 10 µg of proteins in supernatants and pellets respectively were analyzed by SDS-PAGE or Western blotting using mouse anti-His6 antibody. Protein concentration was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue G250, using bovine serum albumin as standard. The absorption of 8 M urea solution was applied as control and subtracted.
Recombinant codon variant or that fused with the bacterially codon-optimized emerald green fluorescent protein (EmGFP) were expressed in either E. coli BL21(DE3) or Rosseta (DE3) cells. Three colonies were selected randomly and the fluorescence of cells, soluble fractions and pellets were measured by an F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer (Hitachi, Japan). Excitation and emission was conducted at 488 nm and 515 nm. Cells harboring pET28-TEVp5M were used as the control and cell fluorescence was subtracted.
The S-tagged TEVp5M or selected codon variant were overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) plysS cells and induced for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min respectively at 37°C. Soluble protein production was determined by measuring the fused S-tag amount, according to Novagen's S•Tag System protocol. The reaction mixture contained 20 µl of FRET assay buffer, 2 µl of FRET ArUAA substrate, 5 µl of S-tag grade S-protein, and 153 µl of sterile deionized water. Reactions were initiated by adding 20 µl of soluble fraction, kept 5 min in the dark, and quenched immediately by adding 20 µl of stop solution. The solution was diluted to 2 ml and recorded fluorescence value at excitation and emission wavelengths of 495–530 nm with an F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer [12]. Three colonies were cultured and protein amounts were analyzed. Cells harboring the plasmid pET-22b were used as the control and fluorescence signal was subtracted.
Purification of recombinant proteins
E. coli cells overexpressing the TEVp variant, or fusion protein as TEVp substrate were collected, re-suspended in buffer B (50 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0), sonicated and centrifuged. Recombinant proteins in supernatants were purified by Ni-NTA resin according to QIAexpressionist protocol. After cleavage of purified two fusion proteins by TEVp5M, the DAL was released from Ni-NTA using buffer B. Purified proteins were concentrated and exchanged with buffer A.
Coupled assay of TEVp activity
Activity of purified DAL as the fusion partner or without the fusion tag was measured using DL-α,-β-diaminopropionate as a substrate to react for 5 min at 37°C. Amount of pyruvate was measured with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. Absorbance at 520 nm was recorded in a U-2001 spectrometer (Hitachi, Japan) [11]. The purified GST-tevS1-DAL and extracted (or purified) codon variant with the mass ratio of 5∶1 was reacted at 30°C for 1 h. After reaction, activity of released DAL was analyzed. Activity of purified TEVp5M and the three codon variants for cleaving modified sequence was analyzed after reacting at 25°C for 6 h. Purified GST-tevS2-DAL and TEVp construct were mixed with the mass ratio of 10∶1 [15]. The DAL activity for the protein substrate mixed with heat-inactivated TEVp5M in soluble fraction or purified form at 100°C for 5 min was applied as the control and subtracted.
Results
Construction of the synonymously mutated TEVp5M
Since TEVp5M is more soluble than the TEVpS219V variant [11], we introduced a series of synonymous mutations into six rare arginine codons in TEVp5M coding sequence converting them to abundant arginine codons found in E. coli. The codon variants constructed include M1–M4 with one or two rare arginine codons being replaced with the optimized arginine codons, and M5–M15, which combined to the mutations in M1–M4 with additional codons (Table 1). The constructed plasmids for expressing the codon variants contain double His6-tag at both ends, or the N-terminal His6-tag and C-terminal GFP harbored the T7 promoter, a ColE1 origin of replication, and a kanamycin resistance marker. The other constructed vectors for expressing the variants with the N-terminal His6-tag and C-terminal S-tag contain the T7 promoter, a p15A origin of replication, and a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene.
Table 1. The synonymous codon substitution in the TEVp5M coding sequence.
Variant | Sequence | |||||
R49 | R50 | R80 | R101 | R105 | R159 | |
TEVp5M | AGA | AGA | AGG | AGA | AGG | AGA |
M 1 | CGT | CGC | AGG | AGA | AGG | AGA |
M 2 | AGA | AGA | AGG | CGT | CGC | AGA |
M 3 | AGA | AGA | CGT | AGA | AGG | AGA |
M 4 | AGA | AGA | AGG | AGA | AGG | CGT |
M 5 | CGT | CGC | AGG | CGT | CGC | AGA |
M 6 | CGT | CGC | CGT | AGA | AGG | AGA |
M 7 | CGT | CGC | AGG | AGA | AGG | CGT |
M 8 | AGA | AGA | CGT | CGT | CGC | AGA |
M 9 | AGA | AGA | AGG | CGT | CGC | CGT |
M 10 | AGA | AGA | CGT | AGA | AGG | CGT |
M 11 | CGT | CGC | CGT | CGT | CGC | AGA |
M 12 | CGT | CGC | CGT | AGA | AGG | CGT |
M 13 | CGT | CGC | AGG | CGT | CGC | CGT |
M 14 | AGA | AGA | CGT | CGT | CGC | CGT |
M 15 | CGT | CGC | CGT | CGT | CGC | CGT |
Qualitative analysis of the expressed codon variants
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses showed that the expression levels of fifteen codon variants in soluble and insoluble fractions varied. Five variants including M10, M11, M12, M14 and M15 were expressed mainly as inclusion bodies, and other variants were expressed in soluble fractions and pellets (Fig. 1). The results suggested that change of certain arginine codons with abundant ones affected protein production and folding of TEVp5M in E. coli.
Quantitative analysis of the expressed codon variants
When expressed in the fusion form with the GFP reporter, nine codon-optimized variants emitted slightly higher cell fluorescence than TEVp5M, whereas six other variants displayed less fluorescence (Fig. 2A). The M1 mutant with synonymous mutations of AGA-AGA clusters of R49 and R50 showed the highest value of relative fluorescence intensity, corresponded with the other report [13]. Six out of the fifteen variants showed different response between their cell-based fluorescence with the fluorescence from soluble fractions, with extra fluorescence trapped in insoluble pellets (Fig. 2A and 2B). Because this method allows the quantification of cell-based fluorescence, which is contributed by protein-emitted fluorescence from insoluble aggregates and soluble form, the solubility of engineered TEVp can thus be evaluated.
Effects of increasing rare tRNAs on production of the selected codon variants
In addition to rare AGA and AGG codons for arginine, there are other four rare codons in E. coli. We noted these rare codons, including four AUA (isoleucine), one CUA (leucine), one CCC and three GGA (glycine), present in the TEVp coding sequence (https://www.addgene.org/8827/sequences/). E. coli strain Rosetta (DE3) harbors the plasmid pRARE that supplies tRNAs for all of the six rare codons. To detect effect of rare tRNAs on enhancing protein expression level, we analyzed protein solubility of six codon variants in Rosetta (DE3). These variants displayed different soluble expression levels in BL21(DE3). As a result, soluble expression levels of all six variants tested were higher in Rosetta (DE3) than in BL21(DE3) (Fig. 2A and 2B, Fig. 3A and 3B). Comparing with TEVp5M, M1 and M5 were more soluble, while other four variants including M3, M10, M12 and M15 were less soluble. In addition, M1 emitted highest fluorescence in BL21(DE3), it became less fluorescent than M5 in Rosseta (DE3), indicating the rare tRNAs may preferably promote M5 experssion. The variant M5 contains four synonymously mutated codons at R49, R50, R101 and R105. About 32% increase in soluble yield of M5 variant was determined in Rossetta (DE3), compared to 15% in the BL21(DE3). Similarly, several other codon variants expressed as insoluble aggregates also emitted stronger fluorescence by co-expressing rare tRNAs.
Soluble expression level of the codon variants induced at initial induction
By detecting the fused S-tag amount, soluble protein production of TEVp5M, M3, and M10 were analyzed following initial induction. One arginine codon at R80 was synonymously mutated in M3, and another mutated arginine codon at R159 was combined in M10. The soluble expression levels of the two codon variants were affected by simple augmentation of rare tRNAs, based on cell fluorescence using GFP reporter (Fig. 2A and 3A). The S-tagged variants were expressed in a different E. coli strain BL21(DE3)plysS to inhibit background expression. The maximum expression levels of soluble TEVp5M, M3 and M10 were detected after induction at 37°C at 20 min, 10 min, and 30 min respectively. With induction time prolonged more than 30 min, soluble amounts of all three TEVp constructs were decreased (Fig. 4A). When the three proteins were expressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3), their soluble expression levels were all decreased after 10 min induction (Fig. 4B), suggesting that the supplied rare tRNAs increased the tendency of certain codon variants to form insoluble aggregates at 37°C. The reason for the difference among codon variants were possibly related to the different position of rare codons in the coding sequence that altered folding process during translation thus the protein solubility, as well as the aggregation with the existing TEVp proteins.
Activity of TEVp5M and fifteen variants in the crude extracts
To test sensitivity of the DAL reporter system, we analyzed the activity of DAL. The specific activities of DAL from purified GST-tevS1-DAL and GST-tevS2-DAL were about 2.1 and 2.2 U/mg protein respectively, whereas those of purified DAL by cleaving the fusion protein and removing the fusion tag were approximately 68 and 73 U/mg protein. This character is sufficient for sensitively analyzing TEVp activity by the enzyme-coupled assay. The four variants M1, M2, M5 and M6 expressed in BL21(DE3) showed slightly higher activity than TEVp5M for cleaving protein substrate GST-tevS1-DAL, two variants M4 and M13 exhibited similar cleavage efficiency, and other variants were less active than TEVp5M (Fig. 5A). Co-expression of rare tRNAs increased activity of certain codon variants (M10, M11, M12, M14 and M15) that were expressed mainly as inclusion bodies, but did not increase activity of other variants significantly (Fig. 5B). The different cleavage activity of the soluble codon variants expressed in two E. coli strains was detected respectively by SDS-PAGE (Fig. S1). Among the constructs, M5 expressed in BL21(DE3) and M2 expressed in Rosetta(DE3) showed the highest activity, even soluble production of M5 was less than M1 in BL21(DE3). M2 contains two synonymously mutated codons at R101 and R105. These astonishing results suggested that, even with identical amino acid sequences, protein quality of certain codon variants was decreased upon enhancing protein production by the increased levels of rare tRNAs.
Activity of purified TEVp5M and the selected variants
The three variants M1, M2 and M5 that were more soluble and active than TEVp5M were selected for further purification. The GST-tevS1-DAL coupled assay showed that activity of purified variants M1 and M2 from E. coli BL21(DE3) was slightly less than that of the TEVp5M, while M5 displayed similar activity as TEVp5M (Fig. 6A). Supply of rare tRNAs decreased specific activities of all four TEVp constructs, especially for M2 (Fig. 6B). The activities of TEVp5M and M5 were also decreased by about 21%. The different cleavage efficiency of purified variants from two E. coli strains was further confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. S2). The results suggested that the yield and quality of soluble TEVp5M variants are somewhat contradictory, and optimization of both parameters can be challenging for proteins recombinantly expressed in E. coli.
Discussion
Previously, we have overexpressed three TEVp variants including the TEVpS219V in E. coli Rossetta (DE3) and obtained about 80 mg pure protein from 1L LB culture [11]. As a comparison, only about 3.2 mg of bacterially codon-optimized TEVpS219V was purified from 100 ml LB medium with the assistance of MBP and in vivo self-cleavage [16]. The exact mechanism for the dramatic improvement of yield was unclear, and high-level production of soluble protein in E. coli is affected by several factors including rare codons, transcriptional and translational rates, mRNA structure and stability. In this study, we investigated the possible effect of codon frequency to the production of active TEVp5M, using a combination of six rare arginine codons to generate a collection of fifteen variants with identical protein sequences. When all six rare arginine codons were substituted with abundant codons, the variant M15 was expressed mainly as inclusion bodies, as detected by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. This partly explained why the codon-optimized TEVpS219V was not produced at high yield in E. coli.
To detect protein folding in vivo, we applied EmGFP reporter since it emits stronger fluorescence than other variants [17], and cell fluorescence is correlated with soluble protein amounts using either spectrofluorimetry or flow cytometry [18],[18,19]. We found that GFP in pellets also contributed to cell fluorescence. GFP is active even within protein aggregation [20], but the aggregated GFP gives rise to partial loss of fluorescence [21]. Synonymous mutated rare-to-abundant codons resulted in increase of protein synthesis but in turn affected GFP folding [6], thus, it cannot be assumed that GFP fluorescence in pellet is maintained. Nonetheless, the cell fluorescence combined the signal from both soluble and insoluble form of TEVp-EmGFP thus provided rapid evaluation of overall performance of the designed TEVp codon variants in E. coli. However, quantitative protein amount in pellets could not be assessed reliably by this method, owing to the effect of target protein on GFP folding. A more sensitive approach such as using split GFP reporter [22], should be exploited.
Because GFP requires a long lag phase (95 min) to form the chromophore [23], we used S-tag as the fusion reporter to detect soluble expression level of the TEVp variants at early time points upon induction. As a 15-amino-acid peptide, S-tag can be used to quantitatively detect protein amount. Moreover, S-tag has less effect on protein folding than GFP, though it is not suitable for analyzing protein amount in pellets because the denaturants such as urea inhibit the S-tag complementing S-protein to reconstitute RNase S [24].
Even though expression levels of certain codon variants were elevated in E. coli, improvement of enzymatic activity is more desirable. The current study demonstrated that the co-expressed rare tRNAs can enhance soluble protein production, but not efficiently improve protein quality. Recently, it was proposed that screening codon variants is an effective approach to augmenting soluble expression level [7]. However, we discovered that M2 expressed in both E. coli strains displayed higher activity in the crude extracts but less activity in the purified form than TEVp5M. In contrast, M5 showed similar activity to TEVp5M in the purified form, but higher activity in the crude extract. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate protein production and quality of the codon variants by analyzing the activity in supernatants and purified form.
In conclusion, we confirmed that the synonymous rare-to-abundant arginine codon substitutions and tRNA abundance affected the active production and folding of TEVp5M. Supply of rare tRNAs increased soluble production, but concomitantly caused partial activity loss for certain codon variants. The correlation between in vivo protein expression, solubility and folding, and cleavage efficiency provided a consistent view of the effect of synonymously mutations on the soluble production and function of the sixteen TEVp constructs.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for Dr. Min Guo and Dr. Joanne Doherty (The Scripps Research institute, USA) for revising manuscript. This work is partly supported by Project of Chinese Ministry of Agriculture (Grant No. 2009ZX08010-002B).
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work is partly supported by Project of Chinese Ministry of Sicence and Technology (Grant No. 2009ZX08010-002B). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Zerbs S, Frank AM, Collart FR (2009) Bacterial systems for production of heterologous proteins. Methods in enzymology 463:149–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jana S, Deb JK (2005) Strategies for efficient production of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67:289–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kane JF (1995) Effects of rare codon clusters on high-level expression of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli . Current opinion in biotechnology 6:494–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yadava A, Ockenhouse CF (2003) Effect of codon optimization on expression levels of a functionally folded malaria vaccine candidate in prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems. Infect Immun 71:4961–4969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gvritishvili AG, Leung KW, Tombran-Tink J (2010) Codon preference optimization increases heterologous PEDF expression. PLoS One 5:15056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kudla G, Murray AW, Tollervey D, Plotkin JB (2009) Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli . Science 324:255–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hu S, Wang M, Cai G, He M (2013) Genetic code-guided protein synthesis and folding in Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 288:30855–30861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA (2009) Rare codon content affects the solubility of recombinant proteins in a codon bias-adjusted Escherichia coli strain. Microb Cell Fact 8:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Martínez-Alonso M, García-Fruitós E, Villaverde A (2008) Yield, solubility and conformational quality of soluble proteins are not simultaneously favored in recombinant Escherichia coli . Biotechnol Bioeng 101:1353–1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Waugh DS (2011) An overview of enzymatic reagents for the removal of affinity tags. Protein Expr Purif 80:283–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wei L, Cai X, Qi Z, Rong L, Cheng B, et al. (2012) In vivo and in vitro characterization of TEV protease mutants. Protein Expr Purif 83:157–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fang J, Chen L, Cheng B, Fan J (2013) Engineering soluble tobacco etch virus protease accompanies the loss of stability. Protein Expr Purif 92:29–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kapust RB, Routzahn KM, Waugh DS (2002) Processive degradation of nascent polypeptides, triggered by tandem AGA codons, limits the accumulation of recombinant tobacco etch virus protease in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). Protein Expr Purif 24:61–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kapust RB, Tözsér J, Copeland TD, Waugh DS (2002) The P1′ specificity of tobacco etch virus protease. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication 294:949–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Verhoeven KD, Altstadt OC, Savinov SN (2012) Intracellular detection and evolution of site-specific proteases using a genetic selection system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 166:1340–1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sun C, Liang J, Shi R, Gao X, Zhang R, et al. (2012) Tobacco etch virus protease retains its activity in various buffers and in the presence of diverse additives. Protein Expr Purif 82:226–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Teerawanichpan P, Hoffman T, Ashe P, Datla R, Selvaraj G (2007) Investigations of combinations of mutations in the jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP) that afford brighter fluorescence, and use of a version (VisGreen) in plant, bacterial, and animal cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770:1360–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Waldo GS, Standish BM, Berendzen J, Terwilliger TC (1999) Rapid protein-folding assay using green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 17:691–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Seitz T, Thoma R, Schoch GA, Stihle M, Benz J, et al. (2010) Enhancing the stability and solubility of the glucocorticoid receptor ligand-binding domain by high-throughput library screening. J Mol Biol 403:562–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Schrödel A, de Marco A (2005) Characterization of the aggregates formed during recombinant protein expression in bacteria. BMC Biochem 6:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Garcia-Fruitos E, Gonzalez-Montalban N, Morell M, Vera A, Ferraz RM, et al. (2005) Aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies does not imply inactivation of enzymes and fluorescent proteins. Microb Cell Fact 4:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cabantous S, Waldo GS (2006) In vivo and in vitro protein solubility assays using split GFP. Nat Methods 3:845–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kazantsev A, Preisinger E, Dranovsky A, Goldgaber D, Housman D (1999) Insoluble detergent-resistant aggregates form between pathological and non-pathological lengths of polyglutamine in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11404–11409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Braud S, Moutiez M, Belin P, Abello N, Drevet P, et al. (2005) Dual expression system suitable for high-throughput fluorescence-based screening and production of soluble proteins. J Proteome Res 4:2137–2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.