Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2014 Nov 17;24(22):2743–2748. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.080

Dynamic Control of Auxin Distribution Imposes a Bilateral-to-Radial Symmetry Switch during Gynoecium Development

Laila Moubayidin 1, Lars Østergaard 1,∗
PMCID: PMC4245708  PMID: 25455035

Summary

Symmetry formation is a remarkable feature of biological life forms associated with evolutionary advantages and often with great beauty. Several examples exist in which organisms undergo a transition in symmetry during development [1, 2, 3, 4]. Such transitions are almost exclusively in the direction from radial to bilateral symmetry [5, 6, 7, 8]. Here, we describe the dynamics of symmetry establishment during development of the Arabidopsis gynoecium. We show that the apical style region undergoes an unusual transition from a bilaterally symmetric stage ingrained in the gynoecium due to its evolutionary origin to a radially symmetric structure. We also identify two transcription factors, INDEHISCENT [9] and SPATULA [10], that are both necessary and sufficient for the radialization process. Our work furthermore shows that these two transcription factors control style symmetry by directly regulating auxin distribution. Establishment of specific auxin-signaling foci and the subsequent development of a radially symmetric auxin ring at the style are required for the transition to radial symmetry, because genetic manipulations of auxin transport can either cause loss of radialization in a wild-type background or rescue mutants with radialization defects. Whereas many examples have described how auxin provides polarity and specific identity to cells in a range of developmental contexts, our data presented here demonstrate that auxin can also be recruited to impose uniform identity to a group of cells that are otherwise differentially programmed.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Open in a new tab

Highlights

  • •

    Apex of the Arabidopsis gynoecium undergoes a bilateral-to-radial symmetry transition

  • •

    Transcription factors IND/SPT are necessary and sufficient for organ radialization

  • •

    IND and SPT regulate auxin transport to achieve radial symmetry

  • •

    Spatiotemporal auxin dynamics control growth and symmetry of the gynoecium

Symmetry transitions in nature are common and occur almost exclusively via a change from radial to bilateral symmetry. Here, Moubayidin and Østergaard reveal how control of auxin transport by SPATULA and INDEHISCENT imposes a rare bilateral-to-radial symmetry switch during Arabidopsis gynoecium development.

Results and Discussion

Transition to Radial Symmetry at the Arabidopsis Gynoecium Apex Occurs through Repression of Margin Identity

Symmetry transitions are common during embryogenesis of all multicellular organisms [1, 2, 3, 4]. In most cases, the transition is from radial to bilateral symmetry and controlled by Hox and decapentaplegic genes in animals [5, 6]. In fact, the echinoderms provide the only reported example in which this order is reversed such that the radially symmetric animal develops from a bilaterally symmetric larvae stage [7, 8].

In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the gynoecium is derived from the fusion of two carpels and forms in the center of the flower. During gynoecium development, the apical style becomes radially symmetric with stigmatic papillae arising [11] (Figure 1A and Figures S1A–S1C available online), suggesting the existence of a switch from bilateral to radial symmetry.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Radial Symmetry in the Arabidopsis Gynoecium Is Imposed by the Activities of IND and SPT

(A) SEM image of the apical region of wild-type Col-0 gynoecia at stage 13.

(B and C) KLU::GUS in Col-0 at stage 9 (B) and stage 12 (C).

(D) SEM image of the apical region of spt-12 gynoecium at stage 13.

(E) KLU::GUS in spt-12 at stage 12. The scale bars in (A)–(E) represent 100 μm.

(F) KLU quantitative RT-PCR in Col-0, spt-12, and ind-2 spt-12. Error bars show SDs. Student’s t test; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. WT, wild-type.

(G–I) Col-0 gynoecia at stage 13. SEM (G) and Toluidine blue-stained cross-sections of the style (H) and ovary (I).

(J–L) ind-2 spt-12 double-mutant gynoecium at stage 13. SEM (J) and Toluidine blue-stained cross-sections of the style (K) and ovary (L). In (G) and (J), white arrow indicates the style region and red arrow indicates the ovary. The scale bars in (G)–(L) represent 100 μm.

(M and N) SEM images of rosette leaf from 35S::IND:GR in Col-0 (M) and spt-12 (N) without DEX.

(O and P) 35S::IND:GR in Col-0 (O) and spt-12 (P) with 10 μM DEX. The scale bars in (M)–(P) represent 200 μm.

(Q–T) SEM of rosette leaf epidermal cells from genotypes and treatments depicted in (M)–(P). Note that induction of IND imposes a change from jigsaw-shaped leaf epidermal cells to cylindrical-shaped cells resembling wild-type style cells in the inset (S’). The scale bars in (Q)–(T) represent 20 μm.

See also Figure S1.

Given that the Arabidopsis gynoecium originates from two fused leaves [11, 12], it is likely that factors involved in specifying leaf margin tissue are also regulated in the gynoecium. Although margin identity genes may have a role in defining margins in the bilaterally symmetric ovary, we would expect such activities to be repressed in the style to achieve radial symmetry. KLUH (KLU) is a margin-identity gene expressed in peripheral cells of Arabidopsis petals and in the marginal tissue of the gynoecium [13]. Expression of KLU::GUS was detected along the entire length of developing gynoecia at stage 9 (Figure 1B) but lost at the style of the mature gynoecium (stage 12 in Figure 1C; developmental stages defined in [14]).

Mutations in the SPATULA (SPT) gene lead to a failure in radial symmetry establishment at the style [10] (Figures 1D and S1D–S1F). Interestingly, in the spt-12 mutant, KLU::GUS was still expressed in the apical medial part throughout gynoecium development (Figure 1E). These results suggest that the bilateral-to-radial transition occurring during style formation requires transcriptional repression of margin-identity genes.

INDEHISCENT and SPATULA Impose Organ Radialization

When the spt mutant is combined with mutations in the INDEHISCENT (IND) gene [9], the effect on style and stigma development is significantly enhanced reflecting the synergistic activities of these two basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors (Figures 1J and S1G–S1I) [15]. In the wild-type gynoecium, the ovary has a bilateral symmetry plane in which the septum divides the ovary into two separate locules, whereas the style is a rounded, compact, and radially symmetric structure (Figures 1G–1I). spt and ind spt have defects in septum formation but maintain bilateral symmetry in the ovary (Figures 1J, 1L, S1J, and S1L). The style in these mutants fails to acquire radial symmetry showing that IND and SPT are required to ensure radial symmetry establishment at the gynoecium apex (Figures 1K and S1K). KLU expression was found to be significantly upregulated in spt and ind spt mutants (Figure 1F) and downregulated in a 35S::IND:GR line [16] induced by dexamethasone (DEX) (Figure S1N). This is in agreement with a role of IND and SPT in promoting radial symmetry, at least partially, by repressing margin identity.

We next tested whether IND and SPT are sufficient to establish radial symmetry in an alternative developmental context such as a bilaterally symmetric flat leaf. To this end, the DEX-inducible 35S::IND:GR line was grown on medium supplemented with DEX. After 15 days, completely radialized leaves emerged as rod-like and cup-like structures (Figures 1M, 1O, and S1M). Notably, the epidermal cell shape of these radialized leaves is reminiscent of the shape of style cells (Figure 1S and inset 1S’), which is in contrast to the normal jigsaw-shaped leaf epidermal cells from noninduced plants (Figure 1Q). Conversely, anatomical analyses of the internal cell types in cross-sections suggest that IND overexpression reprograms only the marginal cells (Figures S1P, S1R, S1T, and S1V). The IND-driven organ radialization was completely dependent on the presence of SPT function, because the effect was lost in the spt-12 mutant background (Figures 1N, 1P, 1R, 1T, S1Q, S1S, S1U, and S1W). Altogether, these results show that both IND and SPT are necessary and sufficient for mediating organ radialization.

Auxin Transport and Signaling Is Dynamic during Gynoecium Growth

During gynoecium development, auxin distribution is tightly controlled in both time and space. Two apical foci of the auxin-signaling reporter, DR5::GFP, are established in the lateral apical domains at early stages (5/6) of organ development (Figures 2A and 2B) [17]. Subsequently, two medial foci emerge at stage 8/9 (Figures 2C and 2D; Movie S1), and immediately prior to formation of the style (stage 10), all four foci are connected in an auxin ring of radial symmetry (Figures 2E and 2F). This pattern mimics the transition of bilateral-to-radial symmetry suggesting a role for the spatiotemporal dynamics of auxin in symmetry establishment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Auxin Is Dynamically Distributed at the Apex of the Developing Gynoecium and Functions in Sustaining Apical-Basal Growth and Establishing Radial Symmetry

(A–F) Confocal images of DR5::GFP in Col-0 at stage 5 (A and B), stage 8 (C and D), and stage 10 (E and F). Upper images are longitudinal views (A, C, and E), and lower images are top views (B, D, and F). l indicates the position of the lateral auxin foci, and m indicates the position of the medial auxin foci. Insets in (B), (D), and (F) indicate the position of the GFP signal in the outline of the gynoecium viewed from the top. The scale bars in (A), (C), and (E) represent 50 μm and in (B), (D), and (F) represent 25 μm.

(G) PIN1::PIN1:GFP stage 9 showing ovary expression in medial region and apical localization presumably transporting auxin toward the top. The scale bar represents 10 μm.

(H) PIN1::PIN1:GFP stage 8 showing strongest expression in medial style region and apolar localization of the PIN1:GFP protein (top view). The scale bar represents 25 μm.

(I) PIN1 apolar localization in ovary of PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A pin1-5 at stage 9. The scale bar represents 10 μm.

(J) Lateral view of PIN3::PIN3:GFP stage 5 with expression in lateral foci (arrows).

(K) Top view of PIN3::PIN3:GFP stage 9 showing expansion of expression in a ring at the position of the presumptive style and apolar localization.

(L) Top view of PIN7::PIN7:GFP stage 7 showing expression in the medial foci (arrows). The scale bars in (J)–(L) represent 25 μm.

(M–R) Confocal images of DR5::RFP at stage 8 (M–O) and stage 10 (P–R) in Col-0 (M and P), pid-8 (N and Q), and ind-2 spt-12 (O and R). The scale bars in (M)–(R) represent 50 μm.

(S–V) SEM images of stage 11 gynoecia from Col-0 (S), PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A pin1-5 (T), pid-8 (U), and ind-2 spt-12 (V). White arrows indicate the base of the ovary. The scale bars in (S)–(V) represent 100 μm.

See also Figure S2.

We initially tested if the auxin-signaling foci are established by local auxin production. The TRYPTOPHANE AMINOTRANSFERASE OF ARABIDOPSIS1 (TAA1) gene encodes an auxin-biosynthesis enzyme and is expressed in the same region as SPT during early stages of gynoecium development (Figures S2A and S2B) [18]. TAA1 and its closest homolog TAR2 likely regulate auxin dynamics in the gynoecium, because the taa1 tar2 double mutant exhibits a split-style phenotype [18]. We conducted the expression analysis of a TAA1::TAA1:GFP line concomitantly with DR5::RFP to correlate the dynamics of auxin production and auxin signaling in vivo. Early in development, expression of these two reporters is nonoverlapping with DR5::RFP in the apical lateral part and TAA1::TAA1:GFP in the medial region (Figure S2B). At stage 9, there is overlap in the medial region with TAA1::TAA1:GFP expanding to the lateral adaxial side (Figure S2C). Because the DR5::RFP signal in the lateral foci appears before the TAA1::TAA1:GFP signal, it is unlikely that the two lateral auxin-signaling foci are established by local auxin synthesis.

Next, we analyzed if auxin transport is involved in establishing the auxin-signaling foci. The PIN1 gene encodes a plasma membrane (PM) localized member of the PIN auxin efflux family that directs polar auxin transport (PAT) via their asymmetric subcellular localization [19, 20]. PIN1 protein is located apically in cells of the ovary presumably to direct auxin flux from the base to the top of the developing gynoecium [16] (Figure 2G). At the apex, PIN1 localization becomes apolar primarily in the medial part of the gynoecium (Figure 2H). PIN1-mediated auxin transport is therefore likely to contribute to the specific pattern of auxin distribution at the apex. Indeed, in gynoecia from a weak pin1 mutant allele (pin1-5), the intensity of the two lateral DR5::GFP foci are severely reduced and apical-basal polarity defects are detected (Figures S2D–S2F). An identical effect occurs in plants with mutations in the PINOID (PID) gene encoding an AGC3-type protein kinase that promotes apical PIN localization at the PM by phosphorylating specific serine residues in PIN proteins [21, 22, 23, 24] (Figures 2M, 2N, 2S, and 2U). Indeed, mutations in two of those specific serine residues (PIN1:GFP S1,3A) [24] lead to apolar distribution of PIN1 along the gynoecium (Figure 2I) and apical-basal growth defects similar to the weak pid-8 mutant [25] (Figures 2T and 2U). Moreover, this growth-defective phenotype is reminiscent of treatment with the PAT inhibitor NPA [26, 27].

Another member of the PIN family, PIN3 is initially confined to a few laterally positioned apical cells (Figure 2J) overlapping with the lateral DR5::GFP foci (Figure 2A). Later, PIN3 is detected throughout the apex in the same domain as DR5::GFP (Figures 2F and 2K) with apolar localization of the protein (Figures 2J and 2K). A third PIN member, PIN7, is localized apolarly in a few medially positioned apical cells from around stage 7 (Figure 2L), presumably joining the activity of PIN1 in establishing the medial foci. At later stages, PIN7 is found throughout the apex sustaining the ring formation similarly to PIN3 (Figure S2G). Expression and localization of PIN1/PIN3/PIN7 suggests that PAT mediates the transition from a bilaterally to a radially distributed auxin response (Figures 2A, 2B, 2E, and 2F). The requirement for apolarly localized PINs to establish the radial auxin maximum at the gynoecium apex resembles the apolar localization of PIN4 around the quiescent center cells of the root apical meristem and its precursor cells during embryogenesis [28, 29]. In this tissue, PIN4 is necessary for the proper positioning of the auxin-response maximum at the embryo stem cell niche [29].

Lateral and Medial Auxin-Signaling Foci Control Gynoecium Symmetry

To address the role of the lateral and medial pairs of auxin-signaling foci, we tested DR5 expression dynamics in mutants with defects in either apical-basal growth or style development. DR5::GFP in pin1-5 and DR5::RFP in pid-8 mutants showed a drastically decreased signal in the lateral foci, whereas the auxin ring appeared normally, thus correlating with radial style formation (Figures 2M, 2N, 2P, 2Q, 2U, and S2D–S2F). As in many organ-development processes, gynoecium growth along the apical-basal polarity axis follows the direction of auxin flux, directing growth toward the two lateral auxin foci providing cell and tissue polarity [30]. In agreement with the reduced lateral DR5 signals, pin1-5 and pid-8 mutants show apical-basal growth defects (Figures 2U and S2D). Therefore, the two lateral foci are important to ensure apical-basal growth of the two carpels.

In mutants with defects in the bilateral-to-radial symmetry transition, the two lateral DR5 foci are correctly established early during gynoecium development, and these mutants have no apparent apical-basal defects (Figures 2V, S1J, and S2H). In contrast, the medial DR5 foci were not established in these mutant backgrounds (Figures 2O and S2I) and the DR5 ring fails to form (Figures 2R and S2J) [15]. The lack of DR5::RFP in spt-12 is unlikely to be due to lack of auxin biosynthesis, because TAA1::TAA1:GFP is still expressed in spt-12 (Figure S2K). These results suggest that the medial auxin-signaling foci promote the bilateral-to-radial symmetry switch. In agreement with this, the medial DR5 foci form normally in pid-8 gynoecia with no defect in establishing the DR5 ring and correlating with formation of a radial style (Figures 2N and 2Q).

Disrupting Apolar PIN1-Mediated Auxin Distribution at the Gynoecium Apex Abolishes Radial Symmetry Transition

It was previously shown that SPT and IND directly repress PID expression [15, 16]. Accordingly, we found that a PID::GUS reporter was ectopically expressed in the style region of the spt-12 mutant compared to wild-type (Figures 3A and 3B). The importance of apolar PIN1 localization was analyzed by expressing a version of PIN1 that mimics constitutive phosphorylation of the three serine residues targeted by PID (PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E) in the pin1 mutant background [24]. Gynoecia from this line exhibited a split-style phenotype similar to the spt-12 mutant (Figures 1D, 3C, and 3F). Interestingly PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E protein could not be detected at the apex as opposed to a nonmutated PIN1:GFP version (Figures 3D and 3E), suggesting that apical localization renders PIN1 unstable in this tissue. Consistent with defective PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E protein localization, DR5::RFP was not detected in the medial foci of PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E pin1 (Figure 3I) but only in the lateral foci, thereby resembling DR5 distribution in spt and ind spt mutants (Figures 2O, 2R, and S2H–S2J).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Control of PID-Directed PIN Phosphorylation Is Required for Radial Symmetry, and Induced Apolar Transport at the Style Is Sufficient to Rescue Mutants with Radial Defect

(A and B) PID::GUS expression in Col-0 (A) and spt-12 (B) at stage 9. The scale bars represent 25 μm.

(C) SEM image of PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E pin1 at stage 13.

(D) Confocal top-view image of PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E pin1 at stage 8.

(E and F) PIN1::PIN1:GFP pin1 with confocal top view at stage 8 (E) and SEM at stage 13 (F).

(G and H) PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A pin1-5 with confocal top view at stage 8 (G) and SEM at stage 13 (H). The scale bars in (C), (F), and (H) represent 100 μm and in (D), (E), and (G) represent 25 μm.

(I) Confocal images of DR5::RFP at stage 10 from PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,2,3E pin1. The scale bar represents 50 μm.

(J–L) SEM of stage 10 gynoecia from pid-8 spt-12 (J), PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A spt-12 (K), and PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A spt-12 pin1 (L). The scale bars in (J)–(L) represent 100 μm.

See also Figure S3.

These results suggest that PID-mediated phosphorylation of PIN1 is sufficient to prevent radial symmetry. As expected, loss of PIN1 phosphorylation had no effect on radial symmetry establishment, because constitutive apolar localization of the PIN1:GFP S1,3A mutant protein sustains apolar auxin flux (Figures 3G, 3H, S3A, and S3B). Together, these results show that apolar localization of PIN1 is required for radial style formation.

Lateral Auxin Foci Are Required for the Medial Auxin Foci to Promote Radial Symmetry

We next tested the developmental relevance of the sequential appearance of the lateral and medial pairs of foci. The gynoecium phenotype resulting from crosses between pid loss-of-function mutants and spt-12 was analyzed to distinguish between two possible scenarios: (1) if activity of the medial foci is sufficient for radial symmetry establishment, complementation of the spt split-style phenotype was expected by eliminating PID function and (2) if the role of lateral foci is functionally upstream of the medial foci, a failure to establish radial style development was expected in the double mutant. Analysis of the pid-8 spt-12 and pid-9 spt-12 double mutants revealed a strong enhancement of the spt-12 phenotype and a complete failure in radial symmetry establishment. This result is in agreement with the second scenario and suggests that the lateral foci are required to support the role of the medial foci during style development (Figures 3J, S3E, and S3F).

To study whether the split-style phenotype in spt gynoecia is due to a failure of SPT in controlling auxin transport in the medial apex, we introgressed the PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A loss-of-phosphorylation mutant into spt-12. Here, the background was kept wild-type for the endogenous PIN1 gene to sustain formation of the lateral foci and promote apical-basal growth. Gynoecia from this genetic combination exhibited complete restoration of the split defect with perfectly radialized styles (Figures 3K, S3C, and S3G). This was dependent on wild-type endogenous PIN1 in the background, because gynoecia from the PIN1::PIN1:GFP S1,3A spt-12 pin1 triple combination phenocopied spt pid double mutant gynoecia (Figures 3J and 3L). As with the spt pid double mutants, this triple combination was unable to sustain the apical-basal growth, thus affecting the activity of the lateral foci and enhancing the spt phenotype (Figures 3L, S3D, and S3H).

Overall, these results show that SPT (and IND) controls radiality at the gynoecium apex by controlling auxin transport, thus governing auxin flux in the medial region of the style. They also reveal that activity of the medial foci is linked to and dependent on the lateral auxin-signaling foci.

The functional relation between the lateral and medial auxin-signaling foci described here is closely aligned with the stereotypical stages occurring during gynoecium development. As indicated in Figure 4, the early function of the lateral foci is to sustain apical-basal growth allowing to build up the ovary. Subsequently, at stages 8 and 9, in order to obtain a radialized apical style, SPT and IND establish the medial foci by directly repressing PID expression [15, 16], thus sustaining apolar PIN localization and auxin accumulation (Figure 4). It is unknown what stimulates expression of the IND/SPT module, but it is an intriguing possibility that a feedback mechanism exists between IND/SPT and auxin. Finally, we hypothesize that a long-distance signal is required to connect the different foci in a radial auxin-signaling maximum to achieve a switch in cell polarity and thus orchestrating the coordinated growth of the radial style to facilitate fertilization.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Model for Radiality Establishment at the Top End of a Growing Organ

Model showing how auxin-signaling accumulation (green) through polar auxin transport (PAT, arrows) presides over the bilateral-to-radial symmetry switch during gynoecium development. At stage 5, auxin signaling peaks at the lateral top part of the gynoecium, sustaining the apical-basal growth. At stages 8 and 9, SPT and IND repress PID expression, thus promoting apolar PIN localization leading to accumulation of auxin signaling at the medial top and subsequently formation of the radial auxin ring at stages 10 and 11.

Conclusions

Excellent progress has been made in understanding how auxin provides polarity and identity to cells in a range of developmental contexts. The example presented here demonstrates that auxin can also be recruited to coordinate a heterogeneous group of cells to commit to a program, which imposes homogeneous identity to them. This activity leads to an unusual developmental bilateral-to-radial symmetry transition in the Arabidopsis style.

The radial style is a general feature of the female reproductive organ in angiosperms, which arose during the Cretaceous period 100–125 million years ago. The early angiosperms underwent a remarkably rapid diversification and have since reached ecological domination in the plant kingdom in terms of number of species (>300,000) [31]—a phenomenon that Charles Darwin referred to as “the abominable mystery” [32]. Because a radial style is necessary to facilitate efficient fertilization, radialization of the style may have been a key event in allowing the success of flowering plants.

Author Contributions

L.M. and L.Ø. conceived the hypothesis and planned the experiments, L.M. carried out the experimental work, and L.M. and L.Ø. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Samantha Fox and JIC Bioimaging facility for technical support and Remko Offringa, Jiří Friml, Michael Lenhard, and Jose M. Alonso for seeds. We are grateful for discussions and helpful comments on the manuscript from Marie Brüser, Joyita Deb, Łukasz Łangowski, Xinran Li, Remko Offringa, Nicola Stacey, Pauline Stephenson, and Eva Sundberg. This work was supported by grant BB/K008617/1 to L.Ø. from the Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council and by the Institute Strategic Programme grant (BB/J004553/1) to the John Innes Centre.

Published: November 6, 2014

Footnotes

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Procedures, three figures, and one movie and can be found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.080.

Supplemental Information

Document S1. Supplemental Experimental Procedures and Figures S1–S3
mmc1.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
Movie S1. DR5::RFP Signaling during Stages 8 and 9 of Wild-Type Gynoecium, Related to Figure 2

Confocal z stacks of stages 8 and 9 wild-type gynoecium showing the accumulation of DR5::RFP signaling in the lateral and medial apical foci.

Download video file (1.8MB, mp4)
Document S2. Article plus Supplemental Information
mmc3.pdf (4MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Gerhart J. In: Gastrulation: From Cells to Embryos. Stern C.D., editor. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor: 2004. Symmetry breaking in the egg of Xenopus laevis; pp. 341–351. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kimelman D., Bjornson C. In: Gastrulation: From Cells to Embryos. Stern C.D., editor. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor: 2004. Vertebrate mesoderm induction: from frogs to mice; pp. 363–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Akiyama-Oda Y., Oda H. Axis specification in the spider embryo: dpp is required for radial-to-axial symmetry transformation and sog for ventral patterning. Development. 2006;133:2347–2357. doi: 10.1242/dev.02400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aida M., Vernoux T., Furutani M., Traas J., Tasaka M. Roles of PIN-FORMED1 and MONOPTEROS in pattern formation of the apical region of the Arabidopsis embryo. Development. 2002;129:3965–3974. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.17.3965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collins A.G., Valentine J.W. Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to metazoan body plans. Evol. Dev. 2001;3:432–442. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.01048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Holley S.A., Jackson P.D., Sasai Y., Lu B., De Robertis E.M., Hoffmann F.M., Ferguson E.L. A conserved system for dorsal-ventral patterning in insects and vertebrates involving sog and chordin. Nature. 1995;376:249–253. doi: 10.1038/376249a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lowe C.J., Wray G.A. Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution. Nature. 1997;389:718–721. doi: 10.1038/39580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pawson D.L. Phylum echinodermata. Zootaxa. 2007;1668:749–764. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liljegren S.J., Roeder A.H., Kempin S.A., Gremski K., Østergaard L., Guimil S., Reyes D.K., Yanofsky M.F. Control of fruit patterning in Arabidopsis by INDEHISCENT. Cell. 2004;116:843–853. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00217-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heisler M.G., Atkinson A., Bylstra Y.H., Walsh R., Smyth D.R. SPATULA, a gene that controls development of carpel margin tissues in Arabidopsis, encodes a bHLH protein. Development. 2001;128:1089–1098. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.7.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roeder A.H.K., Yanofsky M.F. Fruit development in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book. 2006;4:e0075. doi: 10.1199/tab.0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scutt C.P., Vinauger-Douard M., Fourquin C., Finet C., Dumas C. An evolutionary perspective on the regulation of carpel development. J. Exp. Bot. 2006;57:2143–2152. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anastasiou E., Kenz S., Gerstung M., MacLean D., Timmer J., Fleck C., Lenhard M. Control of plant organ size by KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent intercellular signaling. Dev. Cell. 2007;13:843–856. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Smyth D.R., Bowman J.L., Meyerowitz E.M. Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1990;2:755–767. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.8.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Girin T., Paicu T., Stephenson P., Fuentes S., Körner E., O’Brien M., Sorefan K., Wood T.A., Balanzá V., Ferrándiz C. INDEHISCENT and SPATULA interact to specify carpel and valve margin tissue and thus promote seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:3641–3653. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.090944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sorefan K., Girin T., Liljegren S.J., Ljung K., Robles P., Galván-Ampudia C.S., Offringa R., Friml J., Yanofsky M.F., Østergaard L. A regulated auxin minimum is required for seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2009;459:583–586. doi: 10.1038/nature07875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Larsson E., Franks R.G., Sundberg E. Auxin and the Arabidopsis thaliana gynoecium. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:2619–2627. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stepanova A.N., Robertson-Hoyt J., Yun J., Benavente L.M., Xie D.Y., Dolezal K., Schlereth A., Jürgens G., Alonso J.M. TAA1-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for hormone crosstalk and plant development. Cell. 2008;133:177–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gälweiler L., Guan C., Müller A., Wisman E., Mendgen K., Yephremov A., Palme K. Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science. 1998;282:2226–2230. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petrásek J., Mravec J., Bouchard R., Blakeslee J.J., Abas M., Seifertová D., Wisniewska J., Tadele Z., Kubes M., Covanová M. PIN proteins perform a rate-limiting function in cellular auxin efflux. Science. 2006;312:914–918. doi: 10.1126/science.1123542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Benjamins R., Quint A., Weijers D., Hooykaas P., Offringa R. The PINOID protein kinase regulates organ development in Arabidopsis by enhancing polar auxin transport. Development. 2001;128:4057–4067. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.20.4057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Christensen S.K., Dagenais N., Chory J., Weigel D. Regulation of auxin response by the protein kinase PINOID. Cell. 2000;100:469–478. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80682-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Friml J., Yang X., Michniewicz M., Weijers D., Quint A., Tietz O., Benjamins R., Ouwerkerk P.B., Ljung K., Sandberg G. A PINOID-dependent binary switch in apical-basal PIN polar targeting directs auxin efflux. Science. 2004;306:862–865. doi: 10.1126/science.1100618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang F., Zago M.K., Abas L., van Marion A., Galván-Ampudia C.S., Offringa R. Phosphorylation of conserved PIN motifs directs Arabidopsis PIN1 polarity and auxin transport. Plant Cell. 2010;22:1129–1142. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bennett S.R.M., Alvarez J., Bossinger G., Smyth D.R. Morphogenesis in pinoid mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1995;8:505–520. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nemhauser J.L., Feldman L.J., Zambryski P.C. Auxin and ETTIN in Arabidopsis gynoecium morphogenesis. Development. 2000;127:3877–3888. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.18.3877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ståldal V., Sohlberg J.J., Eklund D.M., Ljung K., Sundberg E. Auxin can act independently of CRC, LUG, SEU, SPT and STY1 in style development but not apical-basal patterning of the Arabidopsis gynoecium. New Phytol. 2008;180:798–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Blilou I., Xu J., Wildwater M., Willemsen V., Paponov I., Friml J., Heidstra R., Aida M., Palme K., Scheres B. The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature. 2005;433:39–44. doi: 10.1038/nature03184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Friml J., Benková E., Blilou I., Wisniewska J., Hamann T., Ljung K., Woody S., Sandberg G., Scheres B., Jürgens G., Palme K. AtPIN4 mediates sink-driven auxin gradients and root patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2002;108:661–673. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00656-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Petrásek J., Friml J. Auxin transport routes in plant development. Development. 2009;136:2675–2688. doi: 10.1242/dev.030353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ferrándiz C., Fourquin C., Prunet N., Scutt C.P., Sundberg E., Trehin C., Vialette-Guiraud A.C.M. In: Advances in Botanical Research. Kader J.-C., Delseny M., editors. Academic Press; Burlington: 2010. Carpel development; pp. 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Friedman W.E. The meaning of Darwin’s ‘abominable mystery’. Am. J. Bot. 2009;96:5–21. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Supplemental Experimental Procedures and Figures S1–S3
mmc1.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
Movie S1. DR5::RFP Signaling during Stages 8 and 9 of Wild-Type Gynoecium, Related to Figure 2

Confocal z stacks of stages 8 and 9 wild-type gynoecium showing the accumulation of DR5::RFP signaling in the lateral and medial apical foci.

Download video file (1.8MB, mp4)
Document S2. Article plus Supplemental Information
mmc3.pdf (4MB, pdf)

RESOURCES