Significance
All phases of DNA replication are tightly regulated to ensure that daughter cells inherit a precise copy of the genomic DNA. Although the mechanisms regulating initiation and elongation have been well characterized, the process of how cells recognize replicated regions and complete replication at the precise doubling point remains a fundamental question yet to be addressed. Here we show that the completion of replication involves a transient over-replication of the region where forks converge before the excess regions are incised, resected, and joined. Completion requires several proteins associated with repairing double-strand breaks, but unlike break repair, it occurs independently of homologous recombination and is targeted for inactivation by some bacterial viruses during the transition to lytic replication.
Keywords: replication completion, double-strand break repair, RecBCD, homologous recombination, SbcDC
Abstract
The mechanism by which cells recognize and complete replicated regions at their precise doubling point must be remarkably efficient, occurring thousands of times per cell division along the chromosomes of humans. However, this process remains poorly understood. Here we show that, in Escherichia coli, the completion of replication involves an enzymatic system that effectively counts pairs and limits cellular replication to its doubling point by allowing converging replication forks to transiently continue through the doubling point before the excess, over-replicated regions are incised, resected, and joined. Completion requires RecBCD and involves several proteins associated with repairing double-strand breaks including, ExoI, SbcDC, and RecG. However, unlike double-strand break repair, completion occurs independently of homologous recombination and RecA. In some bacterial viruses, the completion mechanism is specifically targeted for inactivation to allow over-replication to occur during lytic replication. The results suggest that a primary cause of genomic instabilities in many double-strand-break-repair mutants arises from an impaired ability to complete replication, independent from DNA damage.
During chromosomal replication, cells tightly regulate the processes of initiation, elongation, and completion to ensure that each daughter cell inherits an identical copy of the genetic information. Although the mechanisms regulating initiation and elongation have been well characterized (reviewed in refs. 1, 2), the process of how cells recognize replicated regions and complete replication at the precise doubling point remains a fundamental question yet to be addressed. Whether this event occurs once per generation as in Escherichia coli or thousands of times per generation as in human cells, the failure to efficiently carry out this function would be expected to result in a loss of genomic stability. Considering the large number of proteins that cells devote to ensuring the fidelity of replication initiation and elongation, it seems highly probable that the final critical step in this process will be also be tightly regulated and controlled enzymatically.
In some aspects, one could argue that the efficiency of completion is likely to be more critical to the faithful duplication of the genome than that of initiation. When replication origins fail to initiate efficiently, elongation of replication forks from neighboring origins is often able to compensate (3, 4), and both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells are able to tolerate variations in their origin number without severe phenotypic consequences (5–7). However, a failure to accurately limit or join any event where forks converge would be expected to result in duplications, deletions, rearrangements, or a loss of viability depending upon how the DNA ends are resolved at segregation.
A number of studies suggest that an ability to sense when all sequences in the genome have doubled is critical to genomic replication. In vitro, converging replisomes continue through their meeting point as one replisome displaces the other, resulting in over-replication, or a third copy, of the region where the forks meet (8). Complicating the process of genomic doubling even further, several studies have suggested that illegitimate initiations of replication frequently occur at single-strand nicks, gaps, D-loops, and R-loops throughout the genomes of both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (9–14). Similar to when replication forks continue through a previously replicated template, each of these events would generate a third copy of the chromosomal region where the event occurs. Thus, over-replication may be inherent and promiscuous during the duplication of genomes. If true, then to ensure that each sequence of the genome replicates once, and only once, per generation, cells must encode an enzymatic system that is essentially able to count in pairs and efficiently degrade odd or over-replicated regions until the two nascent end pairs of replication events can be joined.
The model organism E. coli is particularly well-suited to dissect how this fundamental process occurs. In E. coli, the completion of replication occurs at a defined region on the genome, opposite to the bidirectional origin of replication (15). Most completion events can be further localized to one of six termination (ter) sequences within the 400-kb terminus region due to the action of Tus, which binds to ter and inhibits replication fork progression in an orientation-dependent manner, in effect stalling the replication fork at this site until the second arrives (16, 17). Although Tus confines converging replication forks to a specific region, it does not appear to be directly involved in the completion reaction because tus mutants have no phenotype and complete replication normally (18). Furthermore, plasmids and bacteriophage lacking ter sequences are maintained stably (19).
Many mutants impaired for either replication initiation or elongation were initially isolated based on their growth defects or an impaired ability to maintain plasmids (20–22). We reasoned that mutants impaired for the ability to complete replication might be expected to exhibit similar phenotypes and initially focused our attention on the properties of recBC and recD mutants. RecB-C-D forms a helicase–nuclease complex that is required for homologous repair of double-strand breaks in E. coli (23, 24). The enzyme uses specific DNA sequences, termed “Chi sites,” to initiate recombination between pairs of molecules. Loss of RecB or C inactivates the enzyme complex, whereas loss of RecD inactivates the nuclease and Chi recognition, but retains helicase activity (23, 24). Here, we show that inactivation of RecBCD leads to a failure to recognize and join replicating molecules at their doubling point. Although the completion process requires RecBCD, it is distinct from double-strand break repair and does not involve a double-strand break intermediate, homologous recombination, or RecA.
Results
Similar to other mutants that are involved in replication initiation or elongation, recBC and recD mutants each exhibit growth abnormalities and plasmid instabilities. These phenotypes are unique compared to those of other recombination mutants, and suggest that these mutants have a broader, more fundamental function in replicating cells. Relative to wild-type cultures, recBC cultures grow poorly and produce large numbers of small, nonviable cells, whereas recD cultures grow for a longer time period and reach a higher cell density (Fig. 1A) (25–28). By comparison, cultures lacking either RecF or RecA, which is essential for all homologous recombination and RecBCD-mediated double-strand break repair, grow comparatively well, arguing that some function of RecBCD is unique from homologous repair and DNA damage.
Fig. 1.
recBC and recD mutants exhibit growth abnormalities and an impaired ability to maintain monomeric plasmids. (A) The growth of recBC mutants is impaired, whereas recD mutants grow for a longer period and reach a higher density relative to cultures of wild-type, recA, or recF mutants. The absorbance at 630 nm of cultures grown at 37 °C is plotted over time. (B) recBC mutants and recD mutants exhibit plasmid instability. Cultures containing the plasmid pBR322 were grown for 30 generations before 10-µL drops of 10-fold serial dilutions were plated with and without ampicillin to determine the fraction of cells that retained the plasmid in each strain. (C) Plasmids replicating in recBC cultures accumulate dimer plasmids, whereas recD cultures accumulate circular and linear multimers. Linear monomers, indicative of double-strand breaks, are reduced in both recBC and recD mutants relative to wild-type cultures. Total genomic and plasmid DNA was prepared from replicating cultures containing pBR322 and examined by Southern analysis using 32P-labeled pBR322 as a probe. DNA was electrophoresed through a 1.0% agarose gel in Tris base, acetic acid, and EDTA (TAE) at 4 V/cm. (D) Unlike other mutants, replication of plasmids in recD mutants leads to multimeric circles that contain both odd and even numbers of plasmid copies. Samples were analyzed as in C except the DNA was electrophoresed through a 0.5% agarose gel in TAE at 1 V/cm. Resolution under these conditions resolves molecules primarily based on the molecule’s size and reduces the impact that shape has on the migration rate of the molecule. (E) Growth, (F) plasmid stability, and (G) plasmid intermediates for recG, xonA, sbcDC, and xonAsbcDC mutants were analyzed as in A–C.
Mutations inactivating RecBC or RecD also affect the stability of plasmid minichromosomes, a feature that is again distinct from other recombination mutants (Fig. 1B) (28, 29). Plasmids grown in recD mutants continue to replicate past the doubling point, producing large quantities of multimeric circles as well as long linear multimers (Fig. 1C). The over-replicated products observed in recD mutants are distinct in that they contain both odd- and even-numbered multimeric products (Fig. 1D). By contrast, in other recombination mutants or in wild-type cultures, the few multimeric products that are detected occur as paired or even-numbered multimers. recBC mutants are also less able to retain plasmids relative to wild-type cultures, although overall cell viability is similarly reduced (Fig. 1B). The unstable phenotype in recBC is distinct from recD mutants and involves an elevated level of gapped molecules and dimer plasmids, rather than extensive over-replication (Fig. 1C). We interpret these observations to suggest that during plasmid replication, the RecD and RecBC subunits of the enzyme are required for cells to recognize and resolve those ends at the doubling point, respectively.
If the plasmid instability in recBC and recD mutants arose from an inability to process double-strand breaks, these mutants would be expected to accumulate broken intermediates. However, as Fig. 1 C and F demonstrate, the proportion of broken, linear plasmids is actually lower in recBC or recD cultures relative to wild-type or other recombination mutants. Additionally, double-strand breaks are estimated to arise in vivo at frequencies ranging from 0.01 to 1 break per 4.5 Mb of replicated genome (30), making it unlikely that these account for the instability of a 4.5-kb plasmid. Finally, plasmids remain stable and replicate normally in recA mutants, which are defective in all homologous recombination and RecBCD-mediated double-strand break repair (Fig. 1 B and C). Taken together, these observations argue strongly against the idea that the growth and minichromosome abnormalities in recBC and recD mutants arise from defective processing of double-strand breaks. However, these phenotypes are all consistent with those expected of mutants that have an impaired ability to recognize and complete replication.
Other phenotypes associated with recBC mutants also suggest that the gene products play a role at the end of the cell cycle. Following UV irradiation, many hypersensitive recombination mutants, including recA and recF, cease DNA synthesis immediately after replication encounters the DNA damage (31, 32). However, recBC mutants are unusual in that they initially recover and continue to replicate similar to wild-type cells. The replication continues normally for a short period before DNA synthesis ceases (31) (Fig. 2), indicating that the defect in recBC mutants is distinct from RecA and arises at the final stages of replication. Consistent with this interpretation, ter sequences are hot spots for RecBCD-mediated recombination (33, 34), implying that the region where replication completes contains substrates frequently recognized by RecBCD in vivo.
Fig. 2.
Following UV irradiation, recBC mutants initially recover replication, but then replication arrests after an approximate doubling of their genomic material. (A) recBC mutants initially recover replication. [14C]Thymine-prelabeled cultures were UV-irradiated or mock-treated and resuspended in media containing [3H]5-bromodeoxyuridine for 1 h to density-label the replication occurring during this period. The denser-replicated DNA was then separated in alkaline CsCl density gradients and quantified. Both wild-type and recBC mutants restore replication equally well during the first hour after UV treatment. recA mutants do not recover. (B) Replication arrests in recBC mutants after an approximate doubling of the DNA. Cultures growing in [3H]thymine were UV-irradiated or mock-treated and sampled at various times to determine the total amount of [3H]DNA accumulated. Wild-type cells recover replication and continue to grow following irradiation. recA mutants do not recover replication. recBC initially recover replication, but then arrest replication once the DNA has approximately doubled. Initial [3H]DNA counts were between 1,057 and 2,610 cpm for all experiments. Plots represent the average of duplicate samples.
To directly examine whether RecBCD functions in completing replication on the chromosome, we profiled the genomes of replicating wild-type and mutant cultures using high-throughput sequencing. In replicating wild-type cultures, the copy number of sequences is highest surrounding the bidirectional origin and then gradually decreases until it reaches the terminus where replication completes (Fig. 3A). In mutants lacking RecBC, there is a marked decrease in the copy number of sequences specifically in the terminus region. The terminus sequences in recBC mutants are underrepresented by up to twofold, relative to wild-type cultures. Assuming that more than half of the sequence reads correspond to parental DNA, one can infer that the majority of cells in the population have difficulty replicating or maintaining sequences in this region. Conversely, an increase in the copy number of sequences within the terminus region is observed in recD mutants, which inactivates the exonuclease activity of the enzyme complex (Fig. 3B). Consistent with the observations on plasmids, the results indicate that the RecBCD complex is required to allow the efficient and accurate completion of replication on the chromosome. The presence of the over-replicated intermediate inside the boundary of the ter sites in recD mutants implies that converging forks transiently pass each other before the nuclease activity of RecBCD resects these over-replicated intermediates back to the doubling point. The lack of sequences at the termination region in recBC mutants reveals that the enzyme complex is required to resolve and join the convergent forks at the doubling point. In its absence, the DNA ends of the converging forks remain subject to nucleolytic attack and are degraded.
Fig. 3.
RecBCD resolves and completes replication at the doubling point on the chromosome, independently of homologous recombination. (A) In wild-type cultures, replication proceeds bidirectionally from the origin and completes in the terminus region. Genomic DNA from replicating cultures was purified, fragmented, and profiled using high-throughput sequencing. Sequence read frequencies, normalized to stationary-phase cells, are plotted relative to their position on the genome. The terminus region of the chromosome, containing terD, -A, -C, and -B, is shown next to each plot. An 8-kb floating average of the sequence frequency is plotted in red. (B) recBC mutants fail to complete replication, leading to degradation of the terminus region. recD mutants fail to resect and limit replication to the doubling point, leading to over-replicated regions in the terminus. Completion occurs normally in recF and recA mutants. (C) Over-replicated regions persist in sbcDC xonA mutants. Illegitimate reinitiations of replication occur in recG. Note the different scale for recG.
Importantly, the completion of replication on the chromosome occurs normally in recF and recA mutants, indicating that the completion reaction catalyzed by RecBCD does not require homologous recombination or involve the repair of double-strand breaks (Fig. 3B). We are not aware of any recombination models for repairing collapsed forks that do not involve RecA, nor do any known recombinational processes require RecBC but not RecA. Thus, the lack of the terminus region DNA in recBC mutants is inconsistent with the idea that the intermediates are associated with a recombination defect or collapsed replication forks occurring in this region. We infer that the impaired ability to complete replication in recBC mutants is independent from RecBC’s role in double-strand break repair and likely accounts for the poor growth of these cells relative to recA or other recombination mutants.
Additional genes associated with double-strand break repair are also involved in completion. SbcDC, a structure-specific helicase–nuclease, and ExoI, a prominent 3′–5′ exonuclease, suppress the growth defects of recBC mutants when mutated and lead to plasmid instability similar to recD (25, 35, 36). Mutations in human homologs of these proteins are associated with genetic instabilities and impaired double-strand break repair (37). In replicating sbcDC xonA mutants, a similar over-replication of the terminus region is observed (Fig. 3C), indicating that these genes play a role in processing or resolving the transient over-replicated regions. Over-replication was less pronounced in the single mutants (Fig. S1), suggesting either functional redundancy or cooperativity between these gene products.
A recent study has shown that mutants lacking RecG, a translocase important for dissolving mis-primed events after DNA damage, also over-replicates its terminus region (Fig. 3C) (38). In both recD and recG mutants, the DNA ends from unresolved completion events lead to over-replication that can also be observed on plasmids. However, as shown in Fig. 4, the over-replication that occurs in these mutants is distinct in several aspects. The aberrant long linear multimeric intermediates that accumulate in recD mutants do not appear in recG mutants. In addition, recD mutants are unique in that they contain prominent odd-numbered circular plasmid multimers, suggesting that RecD contributes to efficient pair recognition before resolution. In contrast, the over-replicated species in recG mutants predominately consist of even-numbered circular multimers (Fig. 4), suggesting that these mutants retain the ability to recognize and resolve molecules as pairs. We interpret these results to suggest that although RecG plays a role in preventing illegitimate reinitiations from occurring, it is not directly involved in recognition or joining of the linear DNA ends at the doubling point. Consistent with this interpretation, recG mutants grow normally and plasmids are stably maintained (Fig. 1 D and E). recG mutants are also constitutively induced for SOS expression (39), which may contribute to the over-replication that occurs on plasmids and the chromosome in these strains (10, 11). Interestingly, the over-replication that occurs in both recD and recG mutants depends on RecA (Fig. 4), demonstrating that recombination can lead to aberrant reinitiation events when the efficiency of the completion reaction is compromised.
Fig. 4.
DNA ends from unresolved completion events lead to distinct recombination-dependent, over-replication intermediates on plasmids in recD and recG mutants. recD mutants accumulate long linear multimers, as well as both odd- and even-numbered multimeric circles. In recG mutants, the over-replicated products consist of predominantly even-numbered, multimeric circles. In both recD and recG mutants, the illegitimate reinitiations of replication depend on RecA. DNA was analyzed as in Fig. 1D.
Many lytic viruses, including bacteriophage lambda, have two modes of replication: an early phase in which its genome doubles similarly to the bacterial chromosome and a late phase in which the viral genome is amplified before packaging and release from the cell (40). Late-phase replication in phage lambda requires expression of the phage Gam protein, which targets and inactivates RecD and SbcDC in the host (41, 42). Similar to the amplification of phage and plasmid DNA (36), we observed that gam expression results in an over-replication of the terminus region (Fig. 5). Thus, to initiate genomic amplification during lytic infection, the phage targets and inactivates the cellular mechanism that limits replication to the doubling point, allowing over-replication to occur.
Fig. 5.
Induction of the bacteriophage gam gene inactivates the cellular mechanism that limits replication to the doubling point. (A) Lambda late-phase replication requires gam induction. (B) gam induction leads to over-replication on plasmids and (C) on the chromosome. Cultures containing a plasmid with an arabinose-inducible gam gene were grown with 0.4% glucose (−) or 0.4% arabinose (+) and prepared as in Fig. 1 B and C.
Discussion
Taken together, the plasmid and chromosomal data presented here indicate that RecBCD is directly involved in limiting replication events and resolving them at points where sequences have doubled. This process is distinct from double-strand break repair and occurs efficiently in the absence of RecA or homologous recombination on both plasmids and the chromosome. However, when one considers the mechanism by which double-strand breaks are repaired, it becomes clear how these two processes may be related (Fig. 6). Double-strand break repair in E. coli requires both RecA and RecBCD function. RecA is believed to pair the severed strands with intact homologous duplex DNA (23, 24). Once this occurs, the sequences between the opposing strands are replicated and joined using the second molecule as a template. A structurally similar process must also occur whenever two replication forks converge. However, in the case of completion, the opposing nascent strands have been brought together by replication forks and should be independent of RecA.
Fig. 6.
Model for the completion of replication and its relationship to homologous double-strand break repair. (A) Converging replication forks pass each other, leading to a transient over-replicated intermediate. RecG facilitates unwinding of the over-replicated intermediates to reduce reinitiation events and illegitimate replication. RecBCD promotes the degradation and resolution of the over-replicated regions at the doubling point. SbcDC and ExoI also participate in the degradation of the over-replicated regions to limit replication. (B) RecA initiates homologous double-strand break repair by pairing DNA ends with a homologous double-stranded template, generating an intermediate that can be repaired by completing the replication of the intervening sequences.
During double-strand break repair, RecBCD is proposed to process the DNA ends before strand invasion. In most models, this processing is restricted to the early stages of the reaction (23, 24). However, in vivo experiments have suggested that strand invasion can occur in the absence of RecBCD, but that its function is still required if viable recombinants are to be recovered (43, 44), arguing that RecBCD enzyme function acts late in the recombination process, perhaps by actively resolving the rereplicated regions at the doubling point.
Considering the chromosomal phenotypes of recBC and recD mutants, it is tempting to speculate that monomeric linear plasmid species, which are diminished or absent in these strains, represent an incised intermediate of over-replicated products (Fig. 1D). However, the precise substrates RecBCD, SbcDC, ExoI, and RecG act upon in the completion process remains to be determined, as does the presumed role that a polymerase and ligase must play in joining the DNA ends.
Several observations favor a mechanism involving a transient over-replication when forks converge. The location of ter sequences on the chromosome is positioned to allow overreplication of the terminus region to occur before replication is blocked by the action of the Tus protein (15). A number of early studies found that, under various stress conditions, the copy number of sequences surrounding the ter regions increased and speculated that these represented cryptic origins of replication, termed oriX, oriK, or oriM (9, 11, 45). However, it is also reasonable to consider that these alternative “origins” actually represent replication continuing through the terminus because both events would result in elevated copy numbers in this region. Consistent with this, chromosomal over-replication is generally observed to occur under the same conditions as when it is seen on plasmids (Figs. 1 and 3), arguing against the idea of cryptic origins in the terminus. In vitro, converging replisomes continue through their meeting point as one replisome displaces the other, resulting in over-replication at the region where the forks meet (8). Finally, transient over-replication has the intuitive advantage of buffering against any potential loss of genetic information and may prevent the loss of genetic information should cell division occur prematurely.
Mutations in several human double-strand break repair genes also exhibit growth defects and genetic instabilities in the absence of exogenous DNA damage, suggesting that some of these mutants may have an impaired ability to complete replication.
Materials and Methods
Bacteria.
All strains are derived from SR108 (Table S1) (46).
Plasmid stability, genomic and plasmid DNA extractions, Southern analysis, density-labeled CsCl analysis, and DNA accumulation assays have been described previously (29, 31, 46). Detailed descriptions can be found in SI Materials and Methods.
Copy-Number Analysis.
Overnight cultures were diluted 1:250 in LB supplemented with thymine (LBthy) media and grown at 37 °C to an OD600 of 0.4. Following DNA purification, library preparation and sequencing were performed using NexteraXT and HiSeq2000 (Illumina). All strains were aligned using SR108 parent as reference. Aligned read numbers were determined using Perl scripts and normalized to values obtained for stationary-phase cultures. Further details are provided in SI Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant R15ES021594.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra (accession no. SRP047195).
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1415025111/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.O’Donnell M, Langston L, Stillman B. Principles and concepts of DNA replication in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(7):5. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Costa A, Hood IV, Berger JM. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82:25–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052610-094414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aladjem MI. Replication in context: Dynamic regulation of DNA replication patterns in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(8):588–600. doi: 10.1038/nrg2143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu PY, Nurse P. Establishing the program of origin firing during S phase in fission Yeast. Cell. 2009;136(5):852–864. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dubey DD, Zhu J, Carlson DL, Sharma K, Huberman JA. Three ARS elements contribute to the ura4 replication origin region in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 1994;13(15):3638–3647. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06671.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang X, Lesterlin C, Reyes-Lamothe R, Ball G, Sherratt DJ. Replication and segregation of an Escherichia coli chromosome with two replication origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(26):E243–E250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100874108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hawkins M, Malla S, Blythe MJ, Nieduszynski CA, Allers T. Accelerated growth in the absence of DNA replication origins. Nature. 2013;503(7477):544–547. doi: 10.1038/nature12650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hiasa H, Marians KJ. Tus prevents overreplication of oriC plasmid DNA. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(43):26959–26968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Massy B, Fayet O, Kogoma T. Multiple origin usage for DNA replication in sdrA(rnh) mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. Initiation in the absence of oriC. J Mol Biol. 1984;178(2):227–236. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Asai T, Kogoma T. D-loops and R-loops: Alternative mechanisms for the initiation of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(7):1807–1812. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.7.1807-1812.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Magee TR, Asai T, Malka D, Kogoma T. DNA damage-inducible origins of DNA replication in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1992;11(11):4219–4225. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bhatia V, et al. BRCA2 prevents R-loop accumulation and associates with TREX-2 mRNA export factor PCID2. Nature. 2014;511(7509):362–365. doi: 10.1038/nature13374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hamperl S, Cimprich KA. The contribution of co-transcriptional RNA:DNA hybrid structures to DNA damage and genome instability. DNA Repair (Amst) 2014;19:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Donnianni RA, Symington LS. Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(33):13475–13480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309800110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hill TM. Arrest of bacterial DNA replication. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1992;46:603–633. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.003131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hill TM, Tecklenburg ML, Pelletier AJ, Kuempel PL. tus, the trans-acting gene required for termination of DNA replication in Escherichia coli, encodes a DNA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86(5):1593–1597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kobayashi T, Hidaka M, Horiuchi T. Evidence of a ter specific binding protein essential for the termination reaction of DNA replication in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1989;8(8):2435–2441. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roecklein B, Pelletier A, Kuempel P. The tus gene of Escherichia coli: Autoregulation, analysis of flanking sequences and identification of a complementary system in Salmonella typhimurium. Res Microbiol. 1991;142(2-3):169–175. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(91)90026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duggin IG, Wake RG, Bell SD, Hill TM. The replication fork trap and termination of chromosome replication. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70(6):1323–1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kohiyama M, Cousin D, Ryter A, Jacob F. [Thermosensitive mutants of Escherichia coli K 12. I. Isolation and rapid characterization] Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1966;110(4):465–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wechsler JA, Gross JD. Escherichia coli mutants temperature-sensitive for DNA synthesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;113(3):273–284. doi: 10.1007/BF00339547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maine GT, Sinha P, Tye BK. Mutants of S. cerevisiae defective in the maintenance of minichromosomes. Genetics. 1984;106(3):365–385. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smith GR. Homologous recombination in procaryotes. Microbiol Rev. 1988;52(1):1–28. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.1-28.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kowalczykowski SC, Dixon DA, Eggleston AK, Lauder SD, Rehrauer WM. Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58(3):401–465. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.3.401-465.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Templin A, Kushner SR, Clark AJ. Genetic analysis of mutations indirectly suppressing recB and recC mutations. Genetics. 1972;72(2):105–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Capaldo FN, Barbour SD. The role of the rec genes in the viability of Escherichia coli K12. Basic Life Sci. 1975;5A:405–418. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2895-7_56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Capaldo-Kimball F, Barbour SD. Involvement of recombination genes in growth and viability of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1971;106(1):204–212. doi: 10.1128/jb.106.1.204-212.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Niki H, et al. Chromosomal genes essential for stable maintenance of the mini-F plasmid in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1988;170(11):5272–5278. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.11.5272-5278.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Biek DP, Cohen SN. Identification and characterization of recD, a gene affecting plasmid maintenance and recombination in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986;167(2):594–603. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.2.594-603.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pennington JM, Rosenberg SM. Spontaneous DNA breakage in single living Escherichia coli cells. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):797–802. doi: 10.1038/ng2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Courcelle J, Carswell-Crumpton C, Hanawalt PC. recF and recR are required for the resumption of replication at DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(8):3714–3719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jones C, Holland IB. Role of the SulB (FtsZ) protein in division inhibition during the SOS response in Escherichia coli: FtsZ stabilizes the inhibitor SulA in maxicells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82(18):6045–6049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.18.6045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Horiuchi T, Nishitani H, Kobayashi T. A new type of E. coli recombinational hotspot which requires for activity both DNA replication termination events and the Chi sequence. Adv Biophys. 1995;31:133–147. doi: 10.1016/0065-227x(95)99388-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Horiuchi T, Fujimura Y, Nishitani H, Kobayashi T, Hidaka M. The DNA replication fork blocked at the Ter site may be an entrance for the RecBCD enzyme into duplex DNA. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(15):4656–4663. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.15.4656-4663.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lloyd RG, Buckman C. Identification and genetic analysis of sbcC mutations in commonly used recBC sbcB strains of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1985;164(2):836–844. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.2.836-844.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Silberstein Z, Cohen A. Synthesis of linear multimers of OriC and pBR322 derivatives in Escherichia coli K-12: Role of recombination and replication functions. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(7):3131–3137. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.7.3131-3137.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sharples GJ, Leach DR. Structural and functional similarities between the SbcCD proteins of Escherichia coli and the RAD50 and MRE11 (RAD32) recombination and repair proteins of yeast. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17(6):1215–1217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061215_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Stockum A, Nieduszynski CA, Lloyd RG. Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide. Nature. 2013;500(7464):608–611. doi: 10.1038/nature12312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.O’Reilly EK, Kreuzer KN. Isolation of SOS constitutive mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(21):7149–7160. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.21.7149-7160.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Salzman LA, Weissbach A. Formation of intermediates in the replication of phage lambda DNA. J Mol Biol. 1967;28(1):53–70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sakaki Y, Karu AE, Linn S, Echols H. Purification and properties of the gamma-protein specified by bacteriophage lambda: An inhibitor of the host RecBC recombination enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70(8):2215–2219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kulkarni SK, Stahl FW. Interaction between the sbcC gene of Escherichia coli and the gam gene of phage lambda. Genetics. 1989;123(2):249–253. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lloyd RG, Thomas A. A molecular model for conjugational recombination in Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):328–336. doi: 10.1007/BF00330981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lloyd RG, Evans NP, Buckman C. Formation of recombinant lacZ+ DNA in conjugational crosses with a recB mutant of Escherichia coli K12 depends on recF, recJ, and recO. Mol Gen Genet. 1987;209(1):135–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00329848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.de Massy B, Patte J, Louarn JM, Bouché JP. oriX: A new replication origin in E. coli. Cell. 1984;36(1):221–227. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Courcelle J, Donaldson JR, Chow KH, Courcelle CT. DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli. Science. 2003;299(5609):1064–1067. doi: 10.1126/science.1081328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






