Abstract
Object
The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) was conducted to determine if STA-MCA bypass, when added to best medical therapy, would reduce subsequent ipsilateral stroke in patients with complete ICA occlusion and an elevated OEF in the cerebral hemisphere distal to the carotid occlusion. A recent publication reported the methodology of COSS in detail and briefly outlined the major findings of the trial.29 The surgical results of COSS are described in detail in this report.
Methods
The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) was a parallel group, prospective, 1:1 randomized, open-label, blinded-adjudication treatment trial. Participants with angiographic confirmed complete occlusion of the ICA causing either a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke within 120 days and hemodynamic cerebral ischemia demonstrated by an increased oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measured by positron emission tomography (PET) were randomized to either surgical or medical treatment. The surgical patients underwent a STA-MCA cortical branch anastomosis. One hundred and ninety-five patients were randomized: 97 to the surgical group and 98 to the medical group.
Results
In the intention-to-treat analysis, the two-year rates of the primary endpoint were 0.210 for the surgical group and 0.227 for the medical group (p=0.78, log rank). Fourteen (15%) of the 93 patients who had an STA-MCA arterial bypass had an endpoint ipsilateral hemispheric stroke in the 30 day peri-operative period, 12 within two days. The STA-MCA arterial bypass patency rate was 98% at the 30 day post-operative visit and 96% at the last follow-up examination. STA-MCA arterial bypass markedly improved, although it did not normalize, the level of elevated OEF in the symptomatic cerebral hemisphere. Five operated patients and one non-operated patient in the surgical group had an endpoint ipsilateral hemispheric stroke after the 30 day peri-operative period. No baseline characteristics or intra-operative variables were identified that permitted the identification of those who would experience a procedure related stroke.
Conclusions
In spite of excellent bypass graft patency and improved cerebral hemodynamics, STA-MCA anastomosis did not provide an overall benefit on ipsilateral two-year stroke recurrence, mainly due to a much better than expected stroke recurrence rate (22.7%) in the medical group in the trial, but also because of a significant peri-operative stroke rate (15%).
Keywords: symptomatic occluded internal carotid artery, superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis, impaired cerebral hemodynamics, oxygen extraction fraction, randomized trial
Introduction
Complete occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) by atherosclerotic disease causes approximately 15-25% of ischemic strokes in the carotid artery distribution. Patients treated with medical therapy have a risk of recurrent stroke of 7-10% per year for all stroke and 5-8% per year for ipsilateral ischemic stroke during the first two years following ICA occlusion. 17,18,20,21 ICA occlusion causes an estimated 61,000 first-ever strokes per year in the United States1,6,22,26,37,39 an incidence more than twice the annual occurrence of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.5 Superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) anastomosis was developed to improve hemodynamics distal to an occluded artery.12,38,41 The International Study of Extracranial-to-Intracranial Arterial Anastomosis (STA-MCA bypass trial) tested the usefulness of STA-MCA bypass surgery as a prophylaxis against stroke.13 STA-MCA bypass was not effective in preventing subsequent stroke as compared to best medical therapy in any group of patients, including the 808 patients with symptomatic complete occlusion of the ICA. Based on the results of this trial, extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) arterial bypass was generally abandoned as a treatment for symptomatic complete ICA occlusion. Following the trial, several groups criticized the results on multiple grounds2,8,36 (Ausman-1986, Day-1986, Sundt-1987), , including the inability to identify and separately analyze a subgroup of patients with impaired cerebral hemodynamics due to occlusive cerebrovascular disease in whom surgical revascularization might be more beneficial.8
Since then, advances in neuroimaging have made it possible to determine the hemodynamic effects of ICA occlusion in individual patients.9,17,20,40 The strongest evidence for an association between cerebral hemodynamic impairment and stroke was provided by the St. Louis Carotid Occlusion Study (STLCOS).17 This blinded prospective study found that severe hemodynamic failure, manifested by an elevated oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) in the cerebral hemisphere distal to a complete ICA occlusion, was an independent predictor of subsequent stroke in symptomatic medically treated patients. STA-MCA arterial bypass surgery has been shown to improve cerebral hemodynamics distal to an occluded ICA .4,15,16,27,28,33
The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) was a parallel group, prospective, 1:1 randomized, open-label, blinded-adjudication treatment trial designed to test the hypothesis that STA-MCA anastomosis, when combined with best medical therapy, could reduce by 40 per cent the subsequent occurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke at two years in patients with recent symptomatic ICA occlusion and ipsilateral increased OEF measured by positron emission tomography (PET). The trial design and analysis and primary results have been previously reported.29 The primary endpoint point in the surgical group was (1) all stroke and death from surgery through 30 days post-operatively plus (2) ipsilateral hemispheric ischemic stroke within two years. The primary endpoint in the non-surgical group was (1) all stroke and death from randomization through 30 days plus (2) ipsilateral hemispheric ischemic stroke within two years. All primary endpoints were ipsilateral ischemic strokes. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, two-year rates for ipsilateral ischemic stroke were 21.0% (95% CI, 12.8% to 29.2%; 20 events) for the 97 participants in the surgical group and 22.7% (95% CI, 13.9% to 31.6%; 20 events) for the 98 participants in the nonsurgical group (p=0.78, z-test); difference = 1.7% (95% CI, -10.4% to 13.8%).29
METHODS
Surgical Procedure
The EC-IC arterial bypass procedure used in the COSS trial was a standard STA-MCA cortical branch anastomosis.11,25,30,41 If the STA was not suitable for anastomosis to the MCA, the occipital artery (OA) could be used in place of the STA. All surgical patients were placed on 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin daily prior to the bypass procedure. All other peri-operative issues, such as anticonvulsants, antibiotics, choice of anesthetic agents, intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring and peri-operative fluid loading were left to the discretion of the operating surgeon. The STA-MCA cortical branch anastomosis was done using the best STA branch and the best MCA cortical branch. Only one anastomosis was done. Patients with an “unsuitable” STA (diameter < 1 mm) were excluded from the study. Details of the surgical technique used for the STAMCA anastomosis, such as using running or interrupted 10-0 prolene or nylon sutures, a straight or elliptical incision in the MCA cortical branch, and preparation of the STA graft, were left to the discretion of the operating surgeon. During and immediately following the surgical procedure, data concerning anesthesia techniques, intraoperative blood pressures (BP), cerebral monitoring and technical aspects of the bypass procedure was recorded and saved for analysis. Following surgery, all patients were left on 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin for at least 30 days. Thereafter, when deemed appropriate by their neurosurgeon, patients were returned to the anti-thrombotic treatment preferred by their physicians. Doppler ultrasound examination was used to determine post-operative STA-MCA bypass patency at follow-up visits.
Surgical Certification
Surgeons were certified for the study by: (1) attending an initial training workshop in St. Louis where videotape instruction and surgical practice of microvascular anastomosis was done on frozen cadaver heads and live rat carotid arteries, or (2) demonstrating at least 80% bypass graft patency and less than or equal to 10% stroke and death at one month in at least 10 consecutive STA-MCA bypass surgeries. Provisional certification was issued for those with less than 10 STA-MCA bypass cases available for review to perform a STA-MCA bypass operation on a patient enrolled in the trial under the observation of the principal neurosurgical investigator for the trial or a designated neurosurgeon with extensive STAMCA bypass experience.
Further Cerebrovascular Procedures
Both the non-surgical and surgical patients were prohibited from undergoing any additional surgical procedures following the STA-MCA arterial bypass that might alter cerebral hemodynamics or affect stroke risk, except for carotid endarterectomy performed for the development of symptomatic contralateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery.
Statistics
Categorical variables are displayed as counts and p-values are taken for generalized Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables are displayed as means and standard deviations. Comparisons between groups used t-tests when the normality assumptions were valid. In three cases the normality assumption was not valid and the p-value was derived from a Wilcoxon rank sum test. These instances were noted in the tables.
Results
Thirty different surgeons performed 92 STA-MCA bypasses and 1 OA-MCA bypass at a median 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1-13) days following randomization to the surgical group. Four participants randomized to the surgical group did not undergo surgery. No strokes occurred during the time between randomization and surgery. The bypass patency rate was excellent, with a 98% patency rate (88/90 patients with patency data) at the 30 day post-operative visit. One patient died in the peri-operative period and graft patency data was not recorded in two other patients at the 30 day follow-up visit. At the last follow-up visit that assessed STA-MCA arterial bypass patency (mean 605 (±270 SD) days, range 28-1596 days), the graft patency rate was 96% (86/90 patients with patency data). The mean OEF ratio in the surgical group improved from 1.258 at baseline to 1.109 at the 30-60 day post-operative repeat PET scan (data from 87 participants). In a previous study, the upper limit of the OEF ratio calculated by similar methods in 18 normal subjects was 1.062.17 Twenty-nine per cent (25/87) of the post-operative COSS PET scans were within the normal range.
Fourteen (15%) of the 93 patients who had a STA-MCA arterial bypass had an endpoint ipsilateral hemispheric stroke in the 30 day peri-operative period. Twelve of the 14 peri-operative ipsilateral hemispheric strokes occurred within the first 2 days following surgery. The other two occurred at 5 and 15 days after surgery. The occurrence of 2 strokes more than 2 days after surgery, but within 30 days, was identical to that observed in the non-surgical group of 98 patients who had 2 ipsilateral strokes within 30 days of randomization.
Of the 14 strokes occurring within the 30 day peri-operative period, two were disabling at last follow-up (Barthel index > 12) and one was fatal. The patient who died in the post-operative period had two ipsilateral strokes on the day of surgery, a vertebrobasilar artery distribution stroke on the first postoperative day (POD) and died on POD 4. The bypass was felt to be patent during the surgical procedure. Another patient had a post-operative ipsilateral stroke on the day of surgery. This bypass was also thought to be patent during the procedure, but the graft was occluded at the 30 day follow-up visit. The bypass was not patent at the completion of surgery in a third patient. This patient had an ipsilateral stroke on POD 1. Thus, the STA-MCA bypass was patent at the 30 day follow-up visit in 11 of the 14 patients who had an ipsilateral hemispheric stroke in the 30 day post-operative period. The bypass was patent at last follow-up in the two patients who had a disabling ipsilateral hemispheric stroke in the peri-operative period. In 2 of the patients who had an ipsilateral hemispheric stroke in the 30 day peri-operative period other serious adverse events occurred during this time period (Table 1). One of the patients with a peri-operative ipsilateral hemispheric stroke also had an episode of hypoglycemia on POD 2, a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on POD 6, an episode of atrial fibrillation/flutter on POD 9, a pulmonary embolus on POD 9, and a non-fatal cardiac tamponade on POD 14. A second patient with a peri-operative ipsilateral hemispheric stroke was found to have a small asymptomatic subdural hematoma and significant anemia on POD 3.
Table 1.
Event | Number Of Events | Post-op Day |
---|---|---|
TIA | 4 | 1,7,8,9 |
Subdural hematoma | 3 | 3,21,26 |
Wound infection | 1 | 25 |
Myocardial infarction | 1 | 0 |
Respiratory distress | 1 | 0 |
Seizure | 2 | 2,3 |
DVT | 1 | 6 |
Pulmonary embolus | 1 | 9 |
Atrial fibrillation/flutter | 1 | 9 |
Cardiac tamponade | 1 | 14 |
Severe hypotension | 1 | 19 |
Hypoglycemia | 1 | 2 |
Severe anemia | 1 | 3 |
Twelve additional patients who did not have a 30 day peri-operative stroke had serious adverse events reported in the peri-operative period. (Table 1) Among these events were TIA's that occurred in 4 patients on POD 1, 7, 8 and 9 respectively. Three of these TIA's were reported as ipsilateral hemispheric strokes by the clinical sites, but they were later adjudicated as TIA's. Two of the 12 patients had a subdural hematoma (POD 21 and 26). The subdural hematoma found on POD 26 required surgical drainage. This patient also had a post-operative ipsilateral hemispheric stroke on POD 52. Other events in these 12 patients included a significant myocardial infarction on POD 0, severe respiratory distress on POD 0, one wound infection, one episode of severe hypotension, and a seizure in 2 patients.
The surgical certification method and the 30-day post-op stroke rate in the 30 surgeons who operated in COSS are outlined in Table 2. Fifteen of the 30 surgeons in the trial were certified by attending the initial training workshop. They performed 64 STA-MCA arterial bypasses in the trial with 11 (17 %) peri-operative ipsilateral strokes. Thirteen surgeons were certified by submitting data on 10 or more consecutive STA-MCA arterial bypasses that met the criteria listed above. In the trial they performed 24 STA-MCA arterial bypasses with 3 (13 %) peri-operative ipsilateral strokes. Only 2 surgeons in the trial had provisional certification, and they performed 5 STA-MCA arterial bypasses with no peri-operative strokes. Thus, there was no significant difference in the method of surgical certification for the trial and the incidence of peri-operative strokes (p= .91). Seventeen of the 30 surgeons in the trial provided self-reported data for 292 EC-IC arterial bypasses for the grant submission to the National Institutes of Health for funds to conduct the study. Twenty-seven (9.2%) of these 292 patients had a stroke or died in the 30 day post-operative period. The same 17 surgeons in the COSS trial performed 72 STA-MCA arterial bypasses with 8 (11.1 %) patients having an ipsilateral stroke in the peri-operative period, which was not significantly different from their pre-COSS experience (p=.655).
Table 2.
Method of Certification | Number of Surgeons | Number of Peri-operative Strokes |
---|---|---|
Initial Workshop Attendance | 15 | 11/64 (17%) |
Submission 10 Consecutive Cases | 13 | 3/24 (13%) |
Provisional certification | 2 | 0/5 (0%) |
Since the peri-operative stroke rate negated any net benefit of the bypass surgery, we sought to identify factors that would predict peri-operative stroke occurrence. We performed this analyses for the 12 strokes that occurred within two days, since these were the most likely to be directly related to surgery, and the additional two strokes within 30 days of surgery were the same number as occurred in the non-surgical group within 30 days of randomization. Even though this type of analysis is hazardous because of the increase in false positive rate due to the large number of variables analyzed, we found no baseline or intra-operative variables that were different at the .05 level between those who experienced a stroke within two days of surgery and those who did not (Tables 3, 4A and 4B).
Table 3.
Perioperative Stroke Within 2 days | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | P value | |
Number | 81 | 12 | |
Age (mean (SD), years) | 57.8 (9.3) | 61.1(7.6) | 0.2452 |
Gender | 0.9991 | ||
Male (66) | 57 | 9 | |
Female (27) | 24 | 3 | |
Race | 0.5991 | ||
White (84) | 72 | 12 | |
Other (9) | 9 | 0 | |
Hypertension, No. (%) | 0.6961 | ||
No (18) | 15 | 3 | |
Yes (75) | 66 | 9 | |
Atrial Fibrillation, No. (%) | 0.9991 | ||
No (92) | 80 | 12 | |
Yes (1) | 1 | 0 | |
Hyperlipidemia | 0.9991 | ||
No (16) | 14 | 2 | |
Yes (77) | 67 | 10 | |
Diabetes mellitus | 0.7171 | ||
No (73) | 64 | 9 | |
Yes (20) | 17 | 3 | |
Cigarette smoking | 0.3291 | ||
Never (7) | 6 | 1 | |
Former (54) | 45 | 9 | |
Current (32) | 30 | 2 | |
Previous Myocardial Infarction | 0.1171 | ||
No (83) | 74 | 9 | |
Yes (10) | 7 | 3 | |
Previous Stroke | 0.1381 | ||
No (48) | 44 | 4 | |
Yes (43) | 36 | 7 | |
Unknown (2) | 1 | 1 | |
Entry Event Type | 0.1301 | ||
TIA (42) | 34 | 8 | |
Stroke (51) | 47 | 4 | |
Entry Event Side | 0.3481 | ||
Right (54) | 49 | 5 | |
Left (39) | 32 | 7 | |
Entry Event to Randomization, mean(SD), days | 73.8(38.5) | 53.1(27.5) | 0.0933 |
Randomization to Surgery, mean(SD), days | 10.7(13.3) | 7.3(6.7) | 0.7353 |
Contralateral Carotid Stenosis (%) | 0.9991 | ||
<50 (75) | 65 | 10 | |
50-69 (11) | 10 | 1 | |
≥70 (7) | 6 | 1 | |
Modified Barthel Scale (mean (SD)) | 19.2(1.9) | 20.0(0.0) | 0.1133 |
Modified Rankin Score (mean (SD)) | 1.4(1.1) | 1.1(0.9) | 0.3753 |
NIHSS (mean (SD)) | 1.8(2.2) | 1.4(1.9) | 0.6423 |
SSQoL (summary) (mean (SD)) | 3.7(0.9) | 4.1(0.8) | 0.1462 |
Systolic Blood Pressure (mean (SD), mm Hg) | 132.3(14.8) | 132.3(18.2) | 0.9482 |
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mean (SD), mm Hg | 77.0(10.4) | 72.4(10.8) | 0.1632 |
PET OEF Ratio (mean(SD)) | 1.25(0.13) | 1.29(0.18) | 0.3812 |
Collateral Circulation (number of angiographic Collaterals) | 0.4751 | ||
0 (10) | 9 | 1 | |
1 (34) | 31 | 3 | |
2 (42) | 36 | 6 | |
3 (7) | 5 | 2 | |
Hematocrit (mean (SD)) | 41.2(4.8) | 38.8(3.2) | 0.0992 |
Fisher's Exact Test
t-test
Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Table 4A.
Stroke No | Stroke Yes | Total No. of Subjects | P value* | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anesthesia | ||||
Nitrous oxide | ||||
No | 48 | 9 | 57 | 0.357 |
Yes | 33 | 3 | 36 | |
Halothane | ||||
No | 78 | 12 | 90 | 0.999 |
Yes | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Enflurane | ||||
No | 80 | 12 | 92 | 0.999 |
Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Isoflurane | ||||
No | 49 | 7 | 56 | 0.999 |
Yes | 32 | 5 | 37 | |
Narcotic | ||||
No | 10 | 2 | 12 | 0.651 |
Yes | 71 | 10 | 81 | |
Relaxant | ||||
No | 11 | 3 | 14 | 0.382 |
Yes | 70 | 9 | 79 | |
Barbiturates | ||||
No | 53 | 8 | 61 | 0.999 |
Yes | 28 | 4 | 32 | |
Propofol | ||||
No | 35 | 2 | 27 | 0.498 |
Yes | 56 | 10 | 66 | |
Other general anesthesia | ||||
No | 28 | 4 | 32 | 0.999 |
Yes | 53 | 8 | 61 | |
Local anesthesia | ||||
No | 67 | 10 | 77 | 0.999 |
Yes | 13 | 2 | 15 | |
Side of surgery | ||||
Right | 49 | 5 | 54 | 0.348 |
Left | 32 | 7 | 39 | |
Heparin during MCA occlusion | ||||
No | 69 | 9 | 78 | 0.403 |
Yes | 12 | 3 | 15 | |
Cerebral monitoring | ||||
No | 49 | 6 | 55 | 0.504 |
Yes | 32 | 6 | 38 | |
EEG | ||||
No | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.295 |
Yes | 31 | 5 | 36 | |
Change during MCA occlusion | ||||
No | 28 | 5 | 33 | 0.999 |
Yes | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Evoked potentials | ||||
No | 18 | 3 | 21 | 0.999 |
Yes | 14 | 3 | 17 | |
Change during MCA occlusion | ||||
No | 13 | 3 | 16 | 0.999 |
Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Type of anastomosis | ||||
Interrupted | ||||
No | 21 | 1 | 22 | 0.282 |
Yes | 60 | 11 | 71 | |
Running | ||||
No | 67 | 12 | 79 | 0.202 |
Yes | 14 | 0 | 14 | |
Interrupted and running | ||||
Yes | 70 | 11 | 81 | 0.999 |
No | 11 | 1 | 12 | |
Suture type | ||||
Nylon | 54 | 8 | 62 | 0.999 |
Prolene | 27 | 4 | 31 | |
Suture size | ||||
9-0 | 21 | 3 | 24 | 0.999 |
10-0 | 60 | 9 | 69 | |
Intraoperative bypass graft patency assessment | ||||
Doppler | 58 | 8 | 66 | 0.566 |
Angiography | 19 | 4 | 23 | |
Other | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Anastomosis Patent in OR | ||||
No | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.133 |
Yes | 76 | 13 | 89 | |
No data | 3 | 3 |
P values - Fisher's exact test
Table 4B.
Stroke | Number | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | P value* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average systolic BP during surgery (mm Hg) | No | 81 | 132.8 | 17.8 | 98 | 199 | 0.264 |
Yes | 12 | 138.9 | 15.3 | 118 | 160 | ||
Average diastolic BP during surgery (mm Hg) | No | 81 | 66.3 | 9.7 | 40 | 90 | 0.864 |
Yes | 12 | 65.8 | 9.2 | 52 | 80 | ||
Lowest systolic BP during surgery (mm Hg) | No | 81 | 102.1 | 18.3 | 68 | 177 | 0.064 |
Yes | 12 | 112.6 | 15.8 | 95 | 145 | ||
Lowest diastolic BP during surgery (mm Hg) | No | 81 | 54.3 | 11.0 | 30 | 98 | 0.1186 |
Yes | 12 | 58.8 | 9.7 | 40 | 78 | ||
Duration of lowest BP during surgery (minutes) | No | 79 | 8.3 | 9.9 | 0 | 54 | 0.807 |
Yes | 12 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 1 | 20 | ||
Duration of MCA occlusion (minutes) | No | 78 | 45.4 | 24.2 | 15 | 123 | 0.182 |
Yes | 11 | 55.9 | 25.3 | 26 | 99 | ||
Average systolic BP during MCA occlusion (mm Hg) | No | 78 | 136.2 | 20.9 | 95 | 190 | 0.572 |
Yes | 11 | 140 | 20.7 | 106 | 175 | ||
Average diastolic BP During MCA occlusion (mm Hg) | No | 78 | 67.5 | 11.4 | 40 | 100 | 0.561 |
Yes | 11 | 69.7 | 15.3 | 55 | 110 | ||
Heparin dose | No | 12 | 2500.8 | 2032.7 | 10 | 7500 | 0.704 |
Yes | 3 | 3000 | 1732.1 | 2000 | 5000 | ||
Protamine dose | Not used | ||||||
Diameter of STA (mm) | No | 79 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 1 | 4 | 0.178 |
Yes | 12 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||
Diameter of MCA cortical branch (mm) | No | 79 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 1 | 3 | 0.105 |
Yes | 12 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1 | 3 |
P values - t-tests
Five operated patients had an endpoint ipsilateral hemispheric stroke after the 30 day peri-operative period. (One non-operated patient had an endpoint ipsilateral hemispheric stroke within the two-year follow-up period). In all five of these operated patients, the STA-MCA bypass was documented as patent following the surgical procedure and prior to the stroke. In 4 of these patients, the bypass was documented as still patent following the stroke. There was no information recorded about bypass patency following the stroke in the other patient. Thus, in the 19 patients who had a primary endpoint ipsilateral hemispheric stroke after surgery, the bypass was documented as patent in 15 of the patients following the stroke. Two additional patients who underwent successful STA-MCA bypasses had strokes in the cerebral hemisphere contralateral to the symptomatic occluded carotid artery. Both patients had less than 50% stenosis of the contralateral carotid artery at the time of randomization, and their bypasses were patent at the last follow-up. In one patient, the stroke occurred on POD 556, and the other patient had contralateral hemispheric strokes on POD 279 and POD 608.
Eliminating the 12 surgical patients who had peri-operative strokes within 2 days of surgery from the analysis, but retaining the two who had strokes between 2 and 30 days because these were identical in number to those occurring in the non-surgical group within 30 days of randomization, the rate of recurrent stroke for the remaining 81 patients in the surgical group was 9.0% compared to 22.7% in the non-surgical group.
Discussion
Prior to the start of the trial, there was concern that problems might be encountered during the study with STA-MCA bypass graft patency rates, as the procedure had not be done for patients with cerebral ischemia by most vascular neurosurgeons after the results of the STA-MCA bypass trial were published in 1985. However, the STA-MCA arterial graft patency rates seen in the COSS trial of 96-98% were similar to the results obtained in the STA-MCA bypass trial and other reported patient series. In the STA-MCA Bypass Trial, repeat cerebral angiography was carried out at a median time of 32 days post-op in 92% of the 652 STA-MCA bypass trial patients who had a bypass procedure, and 96% of these patients had a patent STA-MCA anastomosis.13 In a report of 415 STA-MCA anastomoses performed at a single institution over an eight year period, a graft patency rate of 99% was achieved. Cerebral angiography was used to assess graft patency in the first 260 patients and Doppler velocity flow probe examination was performed in the remaining patients in this study.35 The same investigators found a 96% graft patency rate confirmed by cerebral angiography in a separate analysis of 163 of these patients who had a STA-MCA anastomosis performed for cerebral ischemic symptoms due to complete internal carotid artery occlusion.19 Other case series of STA-MCA bypasses have reported graft patency rates of 90-96%.7,23,32,34,42
A literature review in 1978 of multiple case series reported an average permanent neurological morbidity of 2.4% and an average operative mortality of 4.3% in 376 STA-MCA bypass procedures.32 There was an “other morbidity” of 13.6% in these patients. Other series of 100 to 415 patients from the same era of STA-MCA bypass surgery reported peri-operative stroke rates of 2-3.6% and peri-operative mortality rates of 1.2-3%.7,31,42 A peri-operative mortality of 2.1%, a permanent neurological impairment rate of 6.4% and a morbidity rate of 25.5% was found in a more recent series of 47 patient undergoing STA-MCA bypass for cerebral ischemia symptoms34, while no operative mortality and a 3% peri-operative stroke rate was reported in a contemporary study of 73 similar patients.23. However, in the multicenter, randomized STA-MCA bypass trial, 81 (12.2%) strokes in 663 surgical patients occurred between randomization and 30 days post-op using an intent-to-treat analysis of the surgical data. Sixteen of the peri-operative strokes occurred in patients randomized to surgery, but prior to a STA-MCA bypass procedure. The actual (on-treatment) peri-operative stroke rate in this trial was 65 (9.8%) peri-operative strokes in 652 STA-MCA bypass procedures, including 20 (3%) major strokes, with 4 (0.6%) of these strokes having a fatal outcome.3,13
There was a substantial occurrence of peri-operative non-stroke serious adverse events in COSS, including 2 patients who also had a peri-operative stroke and an additional 12 who did not. The rate of peri-operative non-stroke serious adverse events in COSS was similar to the occurrence of these events in previously published series of STA-MCA bypasses. Most of the reports of morbidities associated with STA-MCA bypass surgery have focused on ischemic neurologic deficits and have not listed other non-stroke peri-operative morbidity rates. However, a review in 1978 of 376 STA-MCA bypass procedures reported a peri-operative “other morbidity” (non-cerebral ischemic) rate of 13.6%.32 Seven (2%) of 400 patients7, 12 (3%) of 415 patients35, and 3 (6%) of 47 patients34 undergoing a STA-MCA bypass had a post-operative subdural hematoma/subdural hygroma requiring surgical drainage or subdural-peritoneal shunting. Scalp necrosis around the skin incision developed in 7%31 and 1.3%7 of patients in two series of STA-MCA bypasses. A pulmonary embolus occurred in 4 (6%) of 70 patients after a STA-MCA bypass.31.
In the EC-IC arterial bypass data submitted prior to the COSS trial, many of the EC-IC bypass procedures were not STA-MCA bypasses. Some of the EC-IC bypasses were high flow extracranial carotid artery-MCA anastomoses utilizing a saphenous vein graft or a radial artery graft. Many of these self-reported procedures were done in patients undergoing either deliberate ICA or MCA occlusion for intracranial aneurysm treatment, intracranial tumor resection, or cerebral ischemia caused by moya-moya disease. Also, the majority of the patients were younger than the patients in the COSS trial. Inexperience with the STA-MCA bypass procedure might account for the higher rate of peri-operative strokes seen in the COSS trial. However, the surgeons in COSS who provided the pre-trial data had similar results in COSS. Furthermore, the 30 day postoperative stroke of 15% in the COSS trial was not statistically different from the 9.8% peri-operative stroke rate seen performed in the STA-MCA bypass trial (p=0.136, Chi-square). An extensive analysis of multiple baseline characteristics and intra-operative variables did not demonstrate factors that would definitely identify patients with an increased risk of procedure related stroke.
Conclusions
The COSS trial confirmed that severe impairment of cerebral hemodynamics is an important risk factor for subsequent stroke in patients with symptomatic complete occlusion of the ICA. The study also confirmed the accuracy of PET measurements of OEF in identifying those patients with an occluded ICA at high risk for recurrent stroke due to poor collateral circulation.29 In the trial, STA-MCA arterial bypass markedly improved, although it did not normalize, the level of elevated OEF in the symptomatic cerebral hemisphere. After the second post-operative day, the rate of recurrent ipsilateral stroke for the remainder of the two-year follow-up period was only 9%. However, in spite of excellent bypass graft patency and improved cerebral hemodynamics, STA-MCA anastomosis did not provide an overall benefit on ipsilateral two-year stroke recurrence, mainly due to a much better than expected stroke recurrence rate (22.7%) in the medical group in the trial, but also because of a significant peri-operative stroke rate of 15%. These findings again confirm the hazard of relying on even the most carefully studied historical controls and re-affirm the necessity of performing randomized controlled trials to establish clinical efficacy.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Funding/Support: This research was supported by USPHS grants NS39526, NS42157 and NS41895 from the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS).
Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00029146
US FDA IND #62,657
Role of the Sponsor: The USPHS had no role in the design, collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the preparation of the manuscript. A member of the Executive Committee that oversaw the conduct of the trial was appointed by NINDS. A Data, Safety, and Monitoring Board appointed by NINDS oversaw the conduct of the trial, had access to all data and reviewed the manuscript prior to submission to ensure that the study was being reported appropriately.
Abbreviations used in the paper
- BP
blood pressure
- COSS
Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study
- EC-IC
extracranial-intracranial
- ICA
internal carotid artery
- IQR
interquartile range
- MCA
middle cerebral artery
- NIHSS
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
- OEF
oxygen extraction fraction
- PET
positron emission tomography
- OA
occipital artery
- OA-MCA
occipital artery-middle cerebral artery
- POD
post-operative day
- SS-QoL
Stroke Specific Quality of Life
- STA
superficial temporal artery
- STA-MCA
superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery
- STA-MCA bypass trial
The International Study of Extracranial-to-Intracranial Arterial Anastomosis
- STLCOS
St. Louis Carotid Occlusion Study
- TIA
transient ischemic attack
Footnotes
Author contributions to the study and manuscript preparation include the following:
Conception and design: Powers, Clarke, Grubb, Videen, Adams, Derdeyn
Acquisition of data: Powers, Clarke, Grubb, Videen, Adams, Derdeyn
Analysis and interpretation of data: Powers, Clarke, Grubb, Videen, Adams, Derdeyn
Drafting the article: Grubb, Powers, Clarke
Critically revising the article: Grubb, Powers, Clarke
Reviewed final version of the manuscript and approved it for submission: all authors
Statistical analysis: Clarke
Administrative/technical/material support: Powers, Clarke, Grubb, Videen, Adams, Derdeyn
Conflict of Interest Disclosures:
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Washington University in St. Louis, the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, or the University of Iowa.
References
- 1.Adams HP, Jr, Bendixen BH, Leira E, Chang KC, Davis PH, Woolson RF, et al. A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology. 1999;53:122–125. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.1.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ausman JI, Diaz FG. Critique of the extracranial-intracranial bypass study. Surg Neurol. 1986;26:218–221. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barnett HJM, Fox A, Hachinski V, Haynes B, Peerless SJ, Sackett D, et al. Further conclusions from the extracranial-intracranial bypass trial. Surgical Neurology. 1986;26:227–235. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baron JC, Bousser MG, Rey A, Guillar A, Comar D, Castaigne P. Reversal of focal “misery-perfusion syndrome” by extra-intracranial arterial bypass in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. A case study with 15O positron emission tomography. Stroke. 1981;12:454–459. doi: 10.1161/01.str.12.4.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Eng J Med. 2006;355:928–939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, Miller R, Khoury J, Pancioli A, et al. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: Preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998;29:415–421. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.2.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chater N. Neurosurgical extracranial-intracranial bypass for stroke: with 400 cases. Neurol Res. 1983;5:1–9. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1983.11739637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Day AL, Rhoton AL, Jr., Little JR. The extracranial-intracranial bypass study. Surg Neurol. 1986;26:222–226. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90153-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Derdeyn CP, Grubb RL, Jr, Powers WJ. Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: Methods of measurement and association with stroke risk. Neurology. 1999;53:251–259. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.2.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Derdeyn CP, Videen TO, Simmon NR, Yundt KD, Fritsch SM, Grubb RL, Jr, et al. Count-based PET method for predicting ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid arterial occlusion. Radiology. 1999;212:499–506. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au27499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Donaghy RMP, Yaşargil MG. Microvascular Surgery. CV Mosby; St. Louis: 1967. pp. 75–86. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Donaghy RMP. History of microneurosurgery. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS, editors. Neurosurgery. 2nd Edition I. McGraw-Hill; New York: 1996. pp. 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- 13.EC/IC Bypass Study Group Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1191–1200. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198511073131904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flaherty ML, Flemming KD, McCelland R, Jorgensen NW, Brown RD., Jr Population-based study of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion: incidence and long-term follow-up. Stroke. 2004;35:e349–e352. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000135024.54608.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gibbs JM, Wise RJ, Thomas DJ, Mansfield AO, Russell RW. Cerebral haemodynamic changes after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:140150. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grubb RL, Jr, Ratcheson RA, Raichle ME, Kliefoth AB, Gado MH. Regional cerebral flow and oxygen utilization in superficial temporal-middle cerebral artery anastomosis patients. J Neurosurg. 1979;50:733–741. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.50.6.0733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grubb RL, Jr, Derdeyn CP, Fritsch SM, Carpenter DA, Yundt KD, Videen TO, et al. Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA. 1998;280:1055–1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.12.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Prognosis of symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 1991;1:245–256. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jack CR, Jr, Sundt TM, Jr, Fode NC, Gehring DG. Superficial temporal-middle cerebral artery bypass: clinical pre- and postoperative angiographic correlation. J Neurosurg. 1988;69:46–51. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.1.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klijn CJM, Kappelle LJ, Tulleken CAF, van Gijn J. Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion: A reappraisal of hemodynamic factors. Stroke. 1997;28:2084–2093. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Klijn CJ, van Buren PA, Kappelle LJ, Tulleken CAF, Eikelboom BC, Algra A, et al. Outcome in patients with symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:579–586. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mead GE, Murray H, Farrell A, O'Neill PA, McCollum CN. Pilot study of carotid surgery for acute stroke. Br J Surg. 1997;84:990–992. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mendelowitsch A, Taussky P, Rem JA, Gratzl O. Clinical outcome of standard extracranialintracranial bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0154-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Yoshimoto T. Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon-133 single-photon emission computed tomography study. Stroke. 2002;33:1857–1862. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000019511.81583.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peerless SJ, Gamache FW, Jr, Hunter IG. Continuous suture method for microvascular anastomosis: Technical note. Neurosurgery. 1981;8:695–698. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198106000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pessin MS, Duncan GW, Mohr JP, Poskaner DC. Clinical and angiographic features of carotid transient ischemic attacks. N Eng J Med. 1977;296:358–362. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197702172960703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Powers WJ, Martin WRW, Herscovitch P, Raichle ME, Grubb RL., Jr Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery: Hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Neurology. 1984;34:1168–1174. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.9.1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Powers WJ, Grubb, Raichle ME. Clinical results of extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in patients with hemodynamic cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:61–67. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL, Jr, Videen TO, Adams HP, Jr, Derdeyn CP, for the COSS Investigators Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;306:1983–1992. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ratcheson RA, Grubb RL., Jr . Superficial temporal-middle cerebral cortical artery anastomosis. In: Smith RR, editor. Stroke and the Extracranial Vessels. Raven Press; New York: l984. pp. 255–263. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reichman OH. Complications of cerebral revascularization. Clin Neurosurg. 1976;23:319–335. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/23.cn_suppl_1.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Samson DS, Boone S. Extracranial-intracranial (STA-MCA) arterial bypass: past performance and current concepts. Neurosurgery. 1978;3:79–86. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197807000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Samson Y, Baron JC, Bousser MG. Effects of extra-intracranial arterial bypass on cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in humans. Stroke. 1985;16:609–616. doi: 10.1161/01.str.16.4.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schick U, Zimmerman M, Stolke D. Long-term evaluation of STA-MCA bypass patency. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138:938–943. doi: 10.1007/BF01411282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sundt TM, Jr, Whisnant JP, Fode NC, Piepgras DG, Houser OW. Results, complications, and follow-up of 415 bypass operations for occlusive disease of the carotid system. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985;60:230–240. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60315-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sundt TM., Jr Was the international randomized trial of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass representative of the population at risk? N Engl J Med. 1987;316:814–816. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198703263161318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thiele BL, Young JV, Chikos PM, Hirsch JH, Strandness DE., Jr Correlation of arteriographic findings and symptoms in cerebrovascular disease. Neurology. 1980;30:1041–1046. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.10.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vilela MD, Newell DW. Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass: past, present and future. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24:E2. doi: 10.3171/FOC/2008/24/2/E2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, Samsa GP. Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2523–2528. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Nagahama Y, Nabatame H, Ueno M, Nishizawa S, et al. Significance of increased oxygen extraction fraction in five-year prognosis of major cerebral arterial occlusive diseases. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1992–1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yaşargil MG. Anastomosis between the superficial temporal artery and a branch of the middle cerebral artery. In: Yaşargil MG, editor. Microsurgery Applied to Neurosurgery. George Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart: 1969. pp. 105–115. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zumstein B, Yaşargil MG. Verbesserung der hirndurchblutung durch mikrochirurgische bypass-anastomosen. Schweiz Rundschau Med (Praxis) 1981;70:1866–1873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]