Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2014 Nov 10;9(1):213–218. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.2057

Effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on proliferation and phenotype maintenance in rabbit articular chondrocytes in vitro

HAOJIA HUANG 1,*, QIN LIU 2,3,*, LEI LIU 2, HUAYU WU 4, LI ZHENG 2,3,
PMCID: PMC4247298  PMID: 25452805

Abstract

In autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) to restore defective cartilage, limited cell numbers and dedifferentiation of chondrocytes are the major difficulties. An alternative is the use of growth factors, but their high cost and potential for tumorigenesis are major obstacles. To ensure successful ACI therapy, it is important to find an effective substitute pro-chondrogenic agent. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), one of the green tea catechins, has been widely investigated in studies of interleukin-1β-induced chondrocytes. In the present study, the effects of EGCG on rabbit articular chondrocytes were investigated through the examination of cell proliferation, morphology, glycosaminoglycan synthesis and cartilage-specific gene expression. The results showed that EGCG could effectively promote chondrocyte growth and enhance the secretion and synthesis of the cartilage extracellular matrix by upregulating expression levels of aggrecan, collagen II and Sox9 genes. Expression of the collagen I gene was downregulated, which showed that EGCG effectively inhibited the dedifferentiation of chondrocytes. Hypertrophy, which may lead to chondrocyte ossification, was also undetectable in the EGCG groups. In conclusion, the recommended dose of EGCG was found to be in the range of 5 to 20 μM, with the most marked response observed with 10 μM. The present study may provide a basis for the development of a novel agent as a substitute for growth factors in the treatment of articular cartilage defects.

Keywords: epigallocatechin-3-gallate, pro-chondrogenic agent, chondrocyte, rabbit articular cartilage, dedifferentiation

Introduction

Unlike other tissues, articular cartilage is avascular and has a poor healing potential following defects (1,2). Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is highly recommended for articular cartilage repair (3). During the process of ACI, the isolation of chondrocytes from the donor tissue and expansion of the cells in vitro are necessary; however, this approach is confronted with several problems, including the limited number of isolated chondrocytes and the loss of chondrocyte phenotypes. An alternative is the use of growth factors but their popularization and application in the clinic is limited for a number of reasons: i) Growth factors may induce the formation of osteophytes, resulting in the degeneration of articular cartilage (4); ii) tumorigenesis may occur (57); and iii) growth factors are generally expensive. The identification of another molecular substance to substitute for growth factors in the restoration of defects is, therefore, important.

The possible beneficial health effects of green tea have received considerable attention. The polyphenols in green tea, catechins, which include (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), (−)-epigallocatechin, (−)-epicatechin-3-gallate and (−)-epicatechin, are major constituents in brewed green tea (8). It is known that these green tea polyphenols are effective free radical scavengers and potent antioxidants (9,10), and there is considerable epidemiological evidence suggesting that there is an inverse correlation between green tea consumption and cancer development (1114). Other polyphenols with strong antioxidant properties, found in foods or beverages such as tea, grape and turmeric, have shown both cancer chemopreventative and chemotherapeutic effects in numerous cell culture systems and animal tumor bioassays (1517). Among various nutraceutical ingredients, EGCG, the most abundant and most active catechin derivative in green tea, is predominantly accountable for the biological effects of green tea (15).

EGCG is the most active and widely found polyphenol in green tea and is well known to be a primary contributor to the potential benefits of green tea to human health (1820). The main mechanisms underlying the action of EGCG have been suggested to involve its potent antioxidant activity, which allows neuro- and cardioprotection (21,22). Other favored mechanisms entail the chemopreventative, anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic and cytoprotective effects of EGCG (2325). The protective effect of extracts of EGCG on the metabolism of human chondrocytes in cartilage alteration has also been demonstrated (26,27). Given that EGCG has beneficial health effects, it was hypothesized that it could be a potential chondroprotective agent to replace growth factors when applied in ACI. In this study, the effect of EGCG on chondrocytes and their growth in vitro was investigated. Examination of the cell proliferation, morphology, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis and cartilage-specific gene expression following treatment with EGCG was performed. The present study may provide a basis for the development of a novel agent that can replace growth factors in the treatment of articular cartilage defects.

Materials and methods

Materials and chemicals

EGCG (purity ≥98%, high-performance liquid chromatography) was purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and stored at 4°C. Prior to the experiments, EGCG was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and kept at −20°C until ready for use.

Articular chondrocyte culture

Articular chondrocytes were harvested from knee joint cartilage slices of one-week-old New Zealand rabbits (Animal Center of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China) by enzymatic digestion. In brief, cartilage slices from two rabbits were dissociated enzymatically with 0.25% trypsin (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) for 30 min and then with 2 mg/ml collagenase type II (Gibco-BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in α-modified Eagle’s medium (α-MEM; Gibco-BRL) for 3 h. Following centrifugation, the chondrocytes were resuspended. The cells were cultured with α-MEM containing 20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37°C with the culture medium replaced every other day after plating. Articular chondrocytes at passage 2, with a cell density of 2×104/ml, were used for further studies. Cells were treated with taurine at a final concentration of 15, 30 and 60 μg/ml, and a group without taurine-treatment served as a control. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Guangxi Medical University (approval no 20140121).

Cell proliferation analysis and biochemical assay

Subsequent to being cultured for 2, 4 and 6 days, the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cell precipitations were collected following digestion with Proteinase K solution (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 16 h at 60°C. The DNA production was measured by a spectrofluorometer (UV-1700, Shimadzu Company, Kyoto, Japan) using Hoechst 33258 (Sigma) dye at 460 nm with the absorbance value of Hoechst 33258 dye alone as the baseline. The total secretion of GAG was quantified by absorbance value employing a 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (Sigma) spectrophotometric assay at 525 nm with chondroitin sulfate as the standard sample. The total GAG secretion in each well was calculated according to the standard curve. The secretion of GAGs in each chondrocyte was normalized to the total DNA production of the chondrocytes, which indicated the biosynthetic activity of the cells in various culture media.

Morphological examination

Subsequent to being cultured for 6 days, the cells were washed three times with PBS and fixed in 95% alcohol for 30 min. The cells were then washed with PBS solution and stained with a hematoxylin and eosin kit (Jiancheng Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China). Finally, the cells were observed and photographed using an inverted phase contrast microscope (Axiovert200; Zeiss Corporation, Oberkochen, Germany).

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis

The gene expression of types I, II and X collagen, aggrecan and Sox9 was analyzed by RT-qPCR detection. Total RNA was sequentially extracted with an additional purification step employing an RNA isolation kit [Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China] according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An equal quantity of RNA (300 ng) was used as a template and reverse transcribed into cDNA using an RT kit (Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada), and then amplified using a SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) on a real-time fluorescence quantitative instrument (RealPlex 4; Eppendorf Corporation, New York, NY, USA). The primers (from Parkson Company, Shanghai, China) used for PCR are shown in (Table I). The dissociation curve of each primer pair was analyzed to confirm the primer specificity. Marker gene expression levels of the chondrocytes were analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCT method using GAPDH as the internal control. Each sample was repeated three times for each gene.

Table I.

Primer sequences used in the quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiments.

mRNA Forward primer Reverse primer
GAPDH 5′-CTATAAATTGAGCCCGCAGC-3′ 5′-ACCAAATCCGTTGACTCCG-3′
Aggrecan 5′-CTACACGCTACACCCTCGAC-3′ 5′-ACGTCCTCACACCAGGAAAC-3′
Type I collagen 5′-GTTCAGCTTTGTGGACCTCCG-3′ 5′-GCAGTTCTTGGTCTCGTCAC-3′
Type II collagen 5′-AAGCTGGTGAGAAGGGACTG-3′ 5′-GGAAACCTCGTTCACCCCTG-3′
Type X collagen 5′-CGCTGAACGATACCAAATGCC-3′ 5′-TTCCCTACAGCTGATGGTCC-3′
Sox9 5′-AAGCTCTGGAGACTTCTGAACG-3′ 5′-CGTTCTTCACCGACTTCCTCC-3′

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Cell proliferation

The proliferation of chondrocytes cultured with various concentrations of EGCG (0, 5, 10 and 20 μM) was detected by the DNA content measurements. Cells cultured with EGCG grew faster than those in the control group (P<0.05), as proved by distinctly higher DNA values than the control in the same culture period. Among the groups, the greatest cell proliferation was achieved with 10 μM EGCG. The results indicated that EGCG facilitated chondrocyte growth, particularly at the concentration of 10 μM (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Quantification of cell proliferation by detection of DNA content, and matrix production by GAG analysis. (A) Proliferation of chondrocytes cultured in vitro with 0 μM (control), 5 μM (E-1), 10 μM (E-2) and 20 μM (E-3) epigallocatechin-3-gallate for 2, 4 and 6 days; (B) GAG content (mg) normalized to DNA content (mg). Data from four independent experiments were evaluated and the mean ± standard deviation is shown. * and # indicate P<0.05; ** and ## indicate P<0.01; *** and ### indicate P<0.001 compared with the control group at the same time point. GAG, glycosaminoglycan.

Secretion of GAGs

To determine if extracellular GAG production was affected by EGCG, biochemical assays were performed after 2, 4 and 6 days of culture. The results of intracellular GAG production following the treatment of chondrocytes with different concentrations of EGCG (Fig. 1B) showed that GAG production in culture media treated with EGCG was significantly improved over that in the control at the same time-point. In particular, EGCG at a concentration of 10 μM exhibited the strongest promotion of GAG synthesis among the three concentrations.

Cell morphology

The morphology of articular chondrocytes following treatment with EGCG at various concentrations (0, 5, 10 and 20 μM) is shown in Fig. 2. No evident difference in cell morphology was observed between cells with and without EGCG after 6 days in culture. Compared with the control, the chondrocytes in the presence of EGCG grew better and appeared to have a superior proliferation tendency with the gradually increasing days. At a concentration of 10 μM, EGCG could better facilitate the proliferation of chondrocytes than at other concentrations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hematoxylin and eosin staining images showing the morphology of chondrocytes cultured in vitro with 0 μM (control), 5 μM (E-1), 10 μM (E-2) and 20 μM (E-3) epigallocatechin-3-gallate for 6 days. Cell seeding density, 2×104/ml; original magnification, ×100; scale bar = 200 μm.

Gene expression

The effect of EGCG on the extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis by chondrocytes was further examined through the gene expression of collagen I, collagen II, collagen X, Sox9 and aggrecan [a proteoglycan (PG) composed of GAGs] after 2, 4 and 6 days of culture. As shown in Fig. 3, cartilage-specific gene expression, such as aggrecan, collagen II and Sox9, was significantly enhanced by EGCG at concentrations of 5–20 μM with the 10 μM group showing the highest aggrecan, collagen II and Sox9 expression. The presence of EGCG upregulated aggrecan, collagen II and Sox9 expression, suggesting that EGCG either delayed or prevented the chondrocytes from dedifferentiating into a hypertrophic phenotype. At the same time, collagen X expression was downregulated in all groups, indicating that cell dedifferentiation and hypertrophy were not significant.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Quantitative comparison of extracellular matrix-related gene expression by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The chondrocytes were cultured with 0 μM (control), 5 μM (E-1), 10 μM (E-2) and 20 μM (E-3) EGCG for (A) 2, (B) 4 and (C) 6 days (n=3 for each experiment). The gene expression levels in the EGCG media relative to those in the control group were analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCT method using GAPDH as the internal control. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent culture experiments. * and # indicate P<0.05; ** and ## indicate P<0.01; *** and ### indicate P<0.001 compared with the control group at the same time point. EGCG, epigallocatechin-3-gallate.

EGCG at various concentrations led to lower collagen I expression when compared with the control group subsequent to being in culture for 2, 4 and 6 days. In addition, the levels of collagen I in the 10 μM group were lower than those in other groups. These results further suggested that EGCG could inhibit the dedifferentiation of chondrocytes.

Concentrations of EGCG ranging from 5 to 20 μM therefore upregulated the synthesis of cartilage markers. Among the groups, EGCG at a concentration of 10 μM produced the highest aggrecan and collagen II expression, which was consistent with the results of GAG production (Fig. 1B).

Discussion

Anti-inflammatory agents may provide anti-arthritic effects to facilitate the resolution of cartilage inflammation following injury. EGCG is reported to have a role in the treatment of osteoarthritis (26,28). The present study focused on the effects of EGCG on primary rabbit chondrocytes to demonstrate EGCG as a potential pro-chondrogenic agent that can replace growth factors in cell-based therapies for cartilage repair.

The present study showed that EGCG, which is a novel antioxidant, could well support the growth of chondrocytes. As demonstrated by cell proliferation assays and morphological examination, EGCG could significantly promote chondrocyte growth compared with the control. Furthermore, EGCG could markedly promote GAG deposition in chondrocytes, as shown by biochemical assay (Fig. 1B). PGs are important components of ECMs (29). For all PGs, GAGs constitute a major component of their molecular mass; furthermore, GAGs and a large number of water molecules generate expansion pressure and make the cartilage flexible, which plays an important role in maintaining cartilage load-bearing capacity (30). Consistent with the increase in GAG production, EGCG could upregulate the gene expression of cartilage-specific aggrecan, collagen II and Sox9 (Fig. 3). The chondrogenic transcription factor Sox9 plays a major role in an increased level of chondrogenesis (31,32), in particular activating co-expression with collagen type II (3335). In addition, extensive gene therapy approaches using viral methods to overexpress Sox9 have resulted in marked improvements in the secretion of cartilaginous matrix by articular chondrocytes, bone marrow-derived stem cells and nucleus pulposus cells (3638). These data indicated that EGCG could facilitate chondrocyte proliferation and stimulate exuberant cartilage matrix secretion.

The expression of collagen type I, which marks the dedifferentiation of chondrocytes, was effectively inhibited by EGCG. Dedifferentiation occurs when the differentiated phenotype of chondrocytes, primarily composed of type II collagen and cartilage-specific PGs, is lost and replaced by a complex collagen phenotype consisting of a majority of type I collagen and a low level of PG synthesis (3941). Furthermore, collagen type X, which is specifically associated with hypertrophic chondrocytes and precedes the onset of endochondral ossification (42), was nearly undetectable in the EGCG groups, indicating that the hypertrophy of chondrocytes would not be induced by EGCG. As a consequence, the decreasing collagen I expression and the inconspicuous expression of collagen X could suggest that EGCG prevents the dedifferentiation and hypertrophy of chondrocytes.

EGCG, which is the ester of epigallocatechin and gallic acid, has been found to inhibit the degradation of human cartilage PG and type II collagen, and selectively inhibits a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS)-1, ADAMTS-4, and ADAMTS-5 (43,44). Further research has revealed that EGCG ameliorates the interleukin-1β-mediated suppression of transforming growth factor-β synthesis, and enhances type II collagen and aggrecan core protein synthesis in human articular chondrocytes (45).

With regard to the recommended dose of EGCG, the present results demonstrated that DNA synthesis of rabbit articular chondrocytes was increased in a dose-dependent manner when chondrocytes were cultured in medium containing EGCG at concentrations of 5–20 μM; EGCG at 10 μM could support the strongest cell proliferation and stimulate the greatest matrix secretion.

Acknowledgements

This study has been financially supported by the National Science and Technology Pillar Program of China (grant no. 2012BAI42G00), the Guangxi Scientific Research and Technological Development Foundation (grant no. Guikehe 14125008-2-14), the Guangxi Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (grant no. 2014GXNSFGA118006) and the Guangxi Natural and Open Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Quality Standards (grant no. Guizhongzhongkai 201304).

References

  • 1.Carranza-Bencano A, García-Paino L, Armas Padrón JR, Cayuela Dominguez A. Neochondrogenesis in repair of full-thickness articular cartilage defects using free autogenous periosteal grafts in the rabbit. A follow-up in six months. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2000;8:351–358. doi: 10.1053/joca.1999.0309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sánchez M, Anitua E, Azofra J, Andía I, Padilla S, Mujika I. Comparison of surgically repaired Achilles tendon tears using platelet-rich fibrin matrices. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:245–251. doi: 10.1177/0363546506294078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chung C, Burdick JA. Engineering cartilage tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hsieh PC, Thanapipatsiri S, Anderson PC, Wang GJ, Balian G. Repair of full-thickness cartilage defects in rabbit knees with free periosteal graft preincubated with transforming growth factor. Orthopedics. 2003;26:393–402. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20030401-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Waterfield MD, Scrace GT, Whittle N, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor is structurally related to the putative transforming protein p28sis of simian sarcoma virus. Nature. 1983;304:35–39. doi: 10.1038/304035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Josephs SF, Guo C, Ratner L, Wong-Staal F. Human-proto-oncogene nucleotide sequences corresponding to the transforming region of simian sarcoma virus. Science. 1984;223:487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.6318322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Downward J, Yarden Y, Mayes E, et al. Close similarity of epidermal growth factor receptor and v-erb-B oncogene protein sequences. Nature. 1984;307:521–527. doi: 10.1038/307521a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.del Peso L, González-García M, Page C, Herrera R, Nuñez G. Interleukin-3-induced phosphorylation of BAD through the protein kinase Akt. Science. 1997;278:687–689. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20:933–956. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salah N, Miller NJ, Paganga G, Tijburg L, Bolwell GP, Rice-Evans C. Polyphenolic flavanols as scavengers of aqueous phase radicals and as chain-breaking antioxidants. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;322:339–346. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang CS, Landau JM. Effects of tea consumption on nutrition and health. J Nutr. 2000;130:2409–2412. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.10.2409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Chow WH. Cancer rates among drinkers of black tea. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1997;37:739–760. doi: 10.1080/10408399709527800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buschman JL. Green tea and cancer in humans: a review of the literature. Nutr Cancer. 1998;31:151–159. doi: 10.1080/01635589809514697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kohlmeier L, Weterings KG, Steck S, Kok FJ. Tea and cancer prevention: an evaluation of the epidemiologic literature. Nutr Cancer. 1997;27:1–13. doi: 10.1080/01635589709514494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Na HK, Surh YJ. Intracellular signaling network as a prime chemopreventive target of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006;50:152–159. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200500154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bar-Sela G, Epelbaum R, Schaffer M. Curcumin as an anti-cancer agent: review of the gap between basic and clinical applications. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:190–197. doi: 10.2174/092986710790149738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li Y, Kong D, Wang Z, Sarkar FH. Regulation of microRNAs by natural agents: An emerging field in chemoprevention and chemotherapy research. Pharm Res. 2010;27:1027–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0105-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mak JC. Potential role of green tea catechins in various disease therapies: progress and promise. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2012;39:265–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2012.05673.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ahmed S. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin 3-gallate in arthritis: progress and promise. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:208. doi: 10.1186/ar2982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pandey KB, Rizvi SI. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2009;2:270–278. doi: 10.4161/oxim.2.5.9498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mandel SA, Amit T, Weinreb O, Youdim MB. Understanding the broad-spectrum neuroprotective action profile of green tea polyphenols in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;25:187–208. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-101803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stangl V, Lorenz M, Stangl K. The role of tea and tea flavonoids in cardiovascular health. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006;50:218–228. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200500118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shanmugam MK, Kannaiyan R, Sethi G. Targeting cell signaling and apoptotic pathways by dietary agents: role in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63:161–173. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2011.523502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pan MH, Lai CS, Dushenkov S, Ho CT. Modulation of inflammatory genes by natural dietary bioactive compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:4467–4477. doi: 10.1021/jf900612n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bae JY, Kanamune J, Han DW, Matsumura K, Hyon SH. Reversible regulation of cell cycle-related genes by epigallocatechin gallate for hibernation of neonatal human tarsal fibroblasts. Cell Transplant. 2009;18:459–469. doi: 10.3727/096368909788809776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Akhtar N, Haqqi TM. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppresses the global interleukin-1beta-induced inflammatory response in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R93. doi: 10.1186/ar3368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rasheed Z, Anbazhagan AN, Akhtar N, Ramamurthy S, Voss FR, Haqqi TM. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits advanced glycation end product-induced expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metalloproteinase-13 in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R71. doi: 10.1186/ar2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ahmed S, Wang N, Lalonde M, Goldberg VM, Haqqi TM. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) differentially inhibits interleukin-1 beta-induced expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -13 in human chondrocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;308:767–773. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.059220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Buschmann MD, Grodzinsky AJ. A molecular model of proteoglycan-associated electrostatic forces in cartilage mechanics. J Biomech Eng. 1995;117:179–192. doi: 10.1115/1.2796000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Robinson D, Ash H, Yayon A, Nevo Z, Aviezer D. Characteristics of cartilage biopsies used for autologous chondrocytes transplantation. Cell Transplant. 2001;10:203–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akiyama H. Transcriptional regulation in chondrogenesis by Sox9. Clin Calcium. 2011;21:845–851. (In Japanese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tew SR, Clegg PD. Analysis of post transcriptional regulation of SOX9 mRNA during in vitro chondrogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:1801–1807. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ng LJ, Wheatley S, Muscat GE, et al. SOX9 binds DNA, activates transcription, and coexpresses with type II collagen during chondrogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1997;183:108–121. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marshall OJ, Harley VR. Molecular mechanisms of SOX9 action. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;71:455–462. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2000.3081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Davies SR, Chang LW, Patra D, et al. Computational identification and functional validation of regulatory motifs in cartilage-expressed genes. Genome Res. 2007;17:1438–1447. doi: 10.1101/gr.6224007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tew SR, Li Y, Pothacharoen P, Tweats LM, Hawkins RE, Hardingham TE. Retroviral transduction with SOX9 enhances re-expression of the chondrocyte phenotype in passaged osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Paul R, Haydon RC, Cheng H, et al. Potential use of Sox9 gene therapy for intervertebral degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:755–763. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000058946.64222.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tsuchiya H, Kitoh H, Sugiura F, Ishiguro N. Chondrogenesis enhanced by overexpression of sox9 gene in mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;301:338–343. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)03026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Benya PD, Shaffer JD. Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell. 1982;30:215–224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schnabel M, Marlovits S, Eckhoff G, Fichtel I, Gotzen L, Vécsei V, Schlegel J. Dedifferentiation-associated changes in morphology and gene expression in primary human articular chondrocytes in cell culture. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:62–70. doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karlsen TA, Shahdadfar A, Brinchmann JE. Human primary articular chondrocytes, chondroblasts-like cells, and dedifferentiated chondrocytes: differences in gene, microRNA, and protein expression and phenotype. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;17:219–227. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kwan KM, Pang MK, Zhou S, et al. Abnormal compartmentalization of cartilage matrix components in mice lacking collagen X: implications for function. J Cell Biol. 1997;136:459–471. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.2.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Adcocks C, Collin P, Buttle DJ. Catechins from green tea (Camellia sinensis) inhibit bovine and human cartilage proteoglycan and type II collagen degradation in vitro. J Nutr. 2002;132:341–346. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.3.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vankemmelbeke MN, Jones GC, Fowles C, et al. Selective inhibition of ADAMTS-1, -4 and -5 by catechin gallate esters. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:2394–2403. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Andriamanalijaona R, Kypriotou M, Baugé C, et al. Comparative effects of 2 antioxidants, selenomethionine and epigallocatechin-gallate, on catabolic and anabolic gene expression of articular chondrocytes. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1958–1967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES