Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Dec;58(12):7601–7605. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04134-14

Abdominal Candidiasis Is a Hidden Reservoir of Echinocandin Resistance

Ryan K Shields a,b, M Hong Nguyen a,b,, Ellen G Press a, Cornelius J Clancy a,c
PMCID: PMC4249510  PMID: 25288081

Abstract

FKS mutant Candida isolates were recovered from 24% (6/25) of abdominal candidiasis patients exposed to echinocandin. Candida glabrata (29%) and Candida albicans (14%) mutants were identified. Multidrug-resistant bacteria were recovered from 83% of FKS mutant infections. Mutations were associated with prolonged echinocandin exposure (P = 0.01), breakthrough infections (P = 0.03), and therapeutic failures despite source control interventions (100%). Abdominal candidiasis is a hidden reservoir for the emergence of echinocandin-resistant Candida.

TEXT

Echinocandin antifungals are front-line therapy for invasive candidiasis (1). Echinocandin resistance has emerged with increased use of these agents (2, 3). Resistance is mediated by point mutations within hot spots of FKS genes, which encode the echinocandin target enzyme β-1,3-d-glucan synthase. In studies from our center and others, prior echinocandin exposure was the major risk factor for emergence of FKS mutant Candida (24). The phenomenon is most common for Candida glabrata, a species that is unique for its haploid rather than diploid genome. We demonstrated that C. glabrata FKS mutations were predictive of echinocandin therapeutic failure among patients with invasive candidiasis (2). To date, the overwhelming majority of patients reported to be infected with echinocandin-resistant Candida have candidemia (24). Abdominal candidiasis is at least as common as candidemia (5), but the incidence and clinical impact of echinocandin resistance are unknown. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that FKS mutant Candida isolates are common causes of abdominal candidiasis among patients who have received an echinocandin previously.

Patients with abdominal candidiasis and ≥3 days of prior echinocandin exposure were identified at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a tertiary referral center that specializes in critical care medicine and solid-organ transplantation. Abdominal candidiasis was defined by a Candida-positive culture obtained from an intra-abdominal site by surgery or sterile procedure. Patients must have exhibited at least one of the following: fever (temperature of ≥38°C), hypotension (systolic blood pressure of ≤90 mm Hg or a decrease of >30 mm Hg from the baseline), local signs and symptoms of inflammation, and/or radiologic findings that suggested abdominal candidiasis. Patients with Candida organisms isolated exclusively from indwelling drains or catheters were excluded.

Candida isolates collected at the onset of abdominal candidiasis were selected from our biorepository. Echinocandin MICs were determined in duplicate by Sensititre YeastOne (Trek Diagnostics), which is the echinocandin susceptibility testing method used most commonly in clinical microbiology laboratories (6). YeastOne assays may limit the interlaboratory variability in caspofungin MICs reported with the CLSI broth microdilution method (6, 7). We previously demonstrated a trend toward improved identification of FKS mutant C. glabrata isolates with YeastOne (8, 9). Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as quality controls. MICs were interpreted according to CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (10); intermediate MICs were considered resistant. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria were defined by nonsusceptibility to at least three antimicrobial drug classes (11). Hot spots 1 and 2 of FKS1 (all species) and FKS2 (C. glabrata only) were amplified using PCR (2, 8).

Echinocandin therapeutic failure was defined as breakthrough abdominal candidiasis occurring while the patient had been receiving an echinocandin for ≥3 days or nonbreakthrough disease that failed to respond to an echinocandin and source control interventions (2, 12). In the latter scenario, failure was determined in accordance with consensus definitions for outcomes of antifungal therapy at 14 days (13). Comparisons between groups were made by Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Significance was set at P values of ≤0.05 (two tailed).

Twenty-five patients with abdominal candidiasis who received an echinocandin for a median of 42 days (range, 4 to 438 days) were included (Table 1). Forty percent (10/25) of patients were men; the median age was 54 years (range, 23 to 73 years). All patients had underlying gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, and 92% (23/25) had undergone GI surgery within 30 days preceding the onset of abdominal candidiasis; 44% were solid-organ transplant recipients (multivisceral, 4 patients; small bowel, 4 patients; kidney, 1 patient; liver, 1 patient; and kidney-liver, 1 patient). Disease manifestations included abdominal abscesses (n = 13), peritonitis (n = 8), both abscesses and peritonitis (n = 2), and cholangitis or cholangitis plus peritonitis (n = 1 each). In one patient, a blood culture was also positive for the same Candida species. Forty percent (10/25) of abdominal candidiasis cases were echinocandin breakthrough infections, which occurred during caspofungin (n = 9) or micafungin (n = 1) therapy.

TABLE 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with echinocandin breakthrough and nonbreakthrough abdominal candidiasisa

Patient Age (yr)/sex Underlying disease No. of days of prior echinocandin therapy GI surgeryb Echinocandin therapy (duration prior to breakthroughc) Type(s) of candidiasis Infecting Candida species MIC (μg/ml)
FKS genotype Concomitant bacterial species Treatment of abdominal candidiasis
Response to echinocandin therapy
CSP ANF MCF Source control Antifungal (durationd) Outcome
Echinocandin breakthrough
    1 27/M Lupus erythematosus 12 Yes Caspofungin (6) Abdominal abscess C. albicans 0.12 0.015 0.008 WT MDR Enterobacter aerogenes Surgical debridement Fluconazole (34) Failure: persistence (days 16 and 24) Failure: BT
    2 47/M Chronic pancreatitis 27 Yes Caspofungin (5) Abdominal abscess C. albicans 0.5 0.5 0.25 WT VRE, CoNS Surgical debridement Caspofungin (10) Cure Failure: BT
    3 43/F Crohn's disease 28 Yes Micafungin (14) Abdominal abscess and peritonitis C. glabrata 2 1 0.25 FKS1-D632Y CoNS Surgical debridement Fluconazole (28) Cure Failure: BT
    4 56/M Kidney/liver transplant 42 Yes Caspofungin (16) Peritonitis C. albicans 0.06 0.015 0.03 WT MDR Enterobacter aerogenes Percutaneous drain Caspofungin (14) Failure: death (day 14) Failure: BT and death
    5 68/F Multivisceral transplant 43 Yes Caspofungin (30) Peritonitis C. glabrata 0.5 0.5 0.5 FKS2-S663P VRE Percutaneous drain Caspofungin (7) Failure: death (day 8) Failure: BT and death
    6 55/M Small bowel transplant 68 Yes Caspofungin (22) Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 0.25 0.015 0.03 WT VRE Surgical debridement Caspofungin Voriconazole (51) Failure: recurrence (day 46) Failure: BT and recurrence
    7 66/F Short gut syndrome 106 Yes Caspofungin (58) Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 16 2 4 FKS2-F659del MDR Enterobacter cloacae Surgical debridement Cure Failure: BT
    8 50/M Crohn's disease 228 Yes Caspofungin (191) Abdominal abscess C. krusei 0.25 0.06 0.06 WT Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus spp. Surgical debridement Caspofungin (56) Cure Failure: BT
    9 37/M Small bowel transplant 247 Yes Caspofungin (23) Peritonitis C. glabrata 0.12 0.015 0.015 FKS1-R653I MDR Escherichia coli Percutaneous drain Caspofungin Fluconazole (7) Cure Failure: BT
C. tropicalis 0.12 0.015 0.06 WT Streptococcus viridians
    10 33/F Multivisceral transplant 438 Yes Caspofungin (68) Peritonitis and candidemia C. glabrata 4 0.5 0.12 FKS1-R636S VRE Surgical debridement and enterectomy Caspofungin Voriconazole (12) Failure: persistence, candidemia, and death (day 20) Failure: BT, persistence, and death
Nonbreakthrough
    11 54/F Small bowel transplant 4 Yes Abdominal abscess C. albicans 0.5 0.12 0.015 WT Surgical debridement and enterectomy Caspofungin (35) Cure Cure
    12 46/F Ischemic bowel 12 Yes Peritonitis C. glabrata 0.12 0.03 0.06 WT Surgical debridement Caspofungin (27) Fluconazole (41) Cure Cure
    13 30/M Crohn's disease 13 Yes Abdominal abscess C. albicans 0.12 0.015 0.015 WT KPC Klebsiella pneumoniae Surgical debridement Fluconazole (45) Cure
C. glabrata 0.12 0.015 0.03 WT VRE
    14 58/F Metastatic colon cancer 17 Yes Cholangitis and peritonitis C. glabrata 0.12 0.03 0.015 WT ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis Repair of bile duct and placement of PTC catheter Caspofungin (39) Failure: persistence (days 7 and 22) Failure: persistence
    15 23/F Short gut syndrome 21 Yes Peritonitis C. glabrata 0.12 0.06 0.03 WT Surgical debridement and placement of drain Caspofungin (28) Cure Cure
    16 66/F Diverticulitis 22 Yes Abdominal abscess and peritonitis C. glabrata 0.12 0.06 0.03 WT VRE, CoNS Percutaneous drain Caspofungin (33) Failure: persistence (days 19 and 33) Failure: persistence
    17 64/F Neutropenic colitis 22 Yes Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 0.06 0.03 0.008 WT Surgical debridement Fluconazole (27) Cure
    18 27/F Kidney transplant 23 Yes Abdominal abscess C. tropicalis 0.03 0.015 0.06 WT VRE Percutaneous drain Caspofungin (6) Cure (de-escalation to fluconazole) Cure
    19 66/M Liver transplant 28 Yes Peritonitis C. albicans 0.12 0.015 0.015 WT Percutaneous drain Caspofungin (26) Cure Cure
    20 65/F Small bowel transplant 58 Yes Peritonitis C. glabrata 0.06 0.015 0.015 WT VRE Fluconazole (10) Cure
    21 56/F Short gut syndrome 72 Yes Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 0.12 0.06 0.03 WT MDR Acinetobacter baumannii Fluconazole (35) Cure
    22 51/F Crohn's disease 74 Yes Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 0.12 0.015 0.015 WT Surgical debridement Fluconazole (20) Failure: persistence (day 19)
    23 63/F Short gut syndrome 78 No Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 0.12 0.015 0.03 WT Klebsiella pneumoniae, VRE Percutaneous drain Fluconazole (23) Failure: persistence (day 11)
    24 31/M Multivisceral transplant 81 No Abdominal abscess C. glabrata 0.06 0.03 0.06 WT Enterococcus gallinarum, Proteus mirabilis Surgical debridement Cure
    25 73/M Multivisceral transplant 133 Yes Cholangitis C. albicans 4 1 4 FKS1-S645P Morganella morganii, VRE Placement of PTC catheter Caspofungin (22) Failure: persistence (days 16 and 29) Failure: persistence
a

ANF, anidulafungin; BT, breakthrough; CoNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; CSP, caspofungin; del, deleted; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; F, female; GI, gastrointestinal; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; M, male; MCF, micafungin; MDR, multidrug resistant; PTC, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography; VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; WT, wild type.

b

Within 30 days of disease onset.

c

Number of consecutive days of echinocandin therapy at the time point of the first positive culture.

d

In days, from time point of positive culture.

Twenty-seven Candida isolates were recovered from the 25 patients. C. glabrata (n = 17) was the most common, followed by C. albicans (n = 7), Candida tropicalis (n = 2), and C. krusei (n = 1). Two patients had mixed Candida infections (C. albicans-C. glabrata and C. glabrata-C. tropicalis). Eleven Candida isolates were recovered from the 10 echinocandin breakthrough infections (C. glabrata [n = 6], C. albicans [n = 3], C. tropicalis [n = 1], and C. krusei [n = 1]). One patient had breakthrough infections with both C. glabrata and C. tropicalis. The median anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin MICs were 0.03 μg/ml (range, 0.015 to 4 μg/ml), 0.12 μg/ml (range, 0.06 to 16 μg/ml), and 0.03 μg/ml (range, 0.008 to 4 μg/ml), respectively. The corresponding rates of resistance were 22% (6/27), 30% (8/27), and 19% (5/27), respectively; 19% (5/27) of isolates were resistant to all 3 agents. Twenty-four percent (6/25) of patients were infected with FKS mutant Candida. Mutations were identified in 22% (6/27) of isolates, including 29% (5/17) of C. glabrata and 14% (1/7) of C. albicans isolates. Median duration of prior echinocandin exposure was longer among patients infected with FKS mutant isolates than in those infected with the wild type (119 versus 27 days; P = 0.01). Forty-five percent (5/11) of echinocandin breakthrough isolates were FKS mutants, compared to 6% (1/16) of nonbreakthrough isolates (P = 0.03). All 5 isolates resistant to each echinocandin were FKS mutants. The same FKS mutant C. glabrata isolate was recovered from intra-abdominal and blood cultures in the patient with abdominal candidiasis and candidemia.

Concomitant bacterial pathogens were recovered from 76% (19/25) of patients, including each of the patients infected with FKS mutant Candida. Enterococcus spp. were most common (63% [12/19] patients). Abdominal cultures revealed MDR bacteria in 64% (16/25) of patients. Organisms included vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE; n = 10), MDR Enterobacter spp. (n = 3), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (n = 1), ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (n = 1), MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 1), and MDR E. coli (n = 1). MDR bacteria were recovered from 83% (5/6) of patients infected with FKS mutant Candida.

Echinocandin therapy failed in 52% (13/25) of patients. Therapeutic failures included the 10 breakthrough infections and 3 nonbreakthrough infections that were treated with an echinocandin and a source control. Echinocandin failure occurred in 100% (6/6) of patients infected with FKS mutant Candida. Seven patients who had nonbreakthrough abdominal candidiasis due to wild-type FKS Candida were treated with an echinocandin and source control; the cure rate was 71% (5/7). In comparison, the abdominal candidiasis cure rates were 67% (6/9) among patients who were treated with fluconazole (including 57% [4/7] of patients treated with a concomitant source control and 100% [2/2] of patients treated with fluconazole alone).

This is the first study of echinocandin-resistant candidiasis consisting exclusively of patients with infections other than candidemia. Echinocandin resistance during abdominal candidiasis shared many features previously reported for bloodstream infections, including a predominance of C. glabrata (24). Indeed, the incidence of FKS mutant C. glabrata was virtually identical to those observed in patients with candidemia and prior echinocandin exposure (29% and 32%, respectively) (2, 8). As in candidemia, FKS mutations were detected in the setting of extensive prior echinocandin usage (ranging from 28 to 438 days). Moreover, mutations were associated with poor responses to echinocandin therapy, manifested as breakthrough abdominal candidiasis or treatment failures despite concomitant source control. At our center and many others, Candida isolates recovered from nonblood sites are not tested routinely for echinocandin susceptibility. Since blood cultures have poor sensitivity for detecting abdominal candidiasis (14), most of the echinocandin-resistant isolates in this study were identified retrospectively rather than at the time of infection. In one patient, abdominal candidiasis was the source of FKS mutant C. glabrata candidemia. Therefore, our experience suggests that abdominal candidiasis is a hidden reservoir of echinocandin resistance. In an era of widespread echinocandin use, it is plausible that FKS mutations are also selected at other unrecognized reservoirs. A limitation of this study is that the overall rate of FKS mutations during abdominal candidiasis at our center is unknown. Prospective surveillance studies of echinocandin resistance among Candida isolates recovered from abdominal and other, nonblood sites are warranted.

Our most ominous finding was that FKS mutant Candida isolates were almost always recovered with MDR bacteria. Most cases of abdominal candidiasis are complicated by bacterial coinfections, which are typically due to enteric organisms. The emergence of abdominal infections caused by mixtures of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and fungi reflects the complexity of patients' underlying medical conditions, shared risk factors, and extensive antibiotic and antifungal usage. Abdominal candidiasis constitutes a spectrum of diseases that typically present as abscesses, cholangitis, or peritonitis (15). Echinocandin pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics during abdominal candidiasis have not been evaluated systematically. Data on penetration into intra-abdominal abscesses are absent. Case reports described caspofungin and micafungin concentrations within bile and ascites to be 30% and 15% of serum, respectively (16, 17). In animal studies of caspofungin disposition, 35% of a single dose was present within liver parenchyma after 24 h; however, elimination occurred slowly, with 14.2 and 2.8% of the dose still present at days 5 and 12, respectively (18). The terminal half-life of caspofungin is prolonged when serum and tissue concentrations are comodeled, compared to the half-life in serum alone, supporting a model in which abdominal organs are reservoirs for sustained drug release (19). It is likely that Candida FKS mutations emerged within the abdominal cavity, biliary tree, or abscesses in the face of prolonged subinhibitory echinocandin concentrations.

Source control is a key element of treatment for abdominal candidiasis, but surgery alone is inferior to combined surgical-antifungal approaches. If adequate source control is achieved, our data indicate that echinocandins can be used successfully against nonbreakthrough abdominal candidiasis due to FKS wild-type isolates. In cases of echinocandin breakthrough abdominal candidiasis, however, our experience suggests that alternative agents are more-judicious options. The challenges of treating echinocandin-resistant abdominal candidiasis, particularly when complicated by MDR bacterial coinfection, attest to the importance of rational antimicrobial stewardship policies and other preventive strategies. Studies are needed to better define the epidemiology and clinical aspects of abdominal candidiasis, which is understudied and poorly understood compared to candidemia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by investigator-initiated grants from Astellas and Merck and by the National Institutes of Health through grant KL2TR000146, awarded to R.K.S.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 6 October 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Sobel JD, Pappas PG, Kullberg BJ. 2012. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54:1110–1122. 10.1093/cid/cis021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Press EG, Kwa AL, Cheng S, Du C, Clancy CJ. 2012. The presence of an FKS mutation rather than MIC is an independent risk factor for failure of echinocandin therapy among patients with invasive candidiasis due to Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:4862–4869. 10.1128/AAC.00027-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alexander BD, Johnson MD, Pfeiffer CD, Jimenez-Ortigosa C, Catania J, Booker R, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Perlin DS, Pfaller MA. 2013. Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56:1724–1732. 10.1093/cid/cit136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beyda ND, John J, Kilic A, Alam MJ, Lasco TM, Garey KW. 2014. FKS mutant Candida glabrata: risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 59:819–825. 10.1093/cid/ciu407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carneiro HA, Mavrakis A, Mylonakis E. 2011. Candida peritonitis: an update on the latest research and treatments. World J. Surg. 35:2650–2659. 10.1007/s00268-011-1305-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eschenauer GA, Nguyen MH, Shoham S, Vazquez JA, Morris AJ, Pasculle WA, Kubin CJ, Klinker KP, Carver PL, Hanson KE, Chen S, Lam SW, Potoski BA, Clarke LG, Shields RK, Clancy CJ. 2014. Real-world experience with echinocandin MICs against Candida species in a multicenter study of hospitals that routinely perform susceptibility testing of bloodstream isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58:1897–1906. 10.1128/AAC.02163-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Espinel-Ingroff A, Arendrup MC, Pfaller MA, Bonfietti LX, Bustamante B, Canton E, Chryssanthou E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dannaoui E, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Gaustad P, Gonzalez GM, Guarro J, Lass-Florl C, Lockhart SR, Meis JF, Moore CB, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pelaez T, Pukinskas SR, St-Germain G, Szeszs MW, Turnidge J. 2013. Interlaboratory variability of caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. using CLSI and EUCAST methods: should the clinical laboratory be testing this agent? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:5836–5842. 10.1128/AAC.01519-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Press EG, Updike CA, Clancy CJ. 2013. Caspofungin MICs correlate with treatment outcomes among patients with Candida glabrata invasive candidiasis and prior echinocandin exposure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:3528–3535. 10.1128/AAC.00136-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Press EG, Updike CL, Clancy CJ. 2013. Anidulafungin and micafungin MIC breakpoints are superior to that of caspofungin for identifying FKS mutant Candida glabrata and echinocandin resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:6361–6365. 10.1128/AAC.01451-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; 4th informational supplement. CLSI document M27-S4, 4th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18:268–281. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clancy CJ, Staley B, Nguyen MH. 2006. In vitro susceptibility of breakthrough Candida bloodstream isolates correlates with daily and cumulative doses of fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3496–3498. 10.1128/AAC.00741-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Segal BH, Herbrecht R, Stevens DA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Sobel J, Viscoli C, Walsh TJ, Maertens J, Patterson TF, Perfect JR, Dupont B, Wingard JR, Calandra T, Kauffman CA, Graybill JR, Baden LR, Pappas PG, Bennett JE, Kontoyiannis DP, Cordonnier C, Viviani MA, Bille J, Almyroudis NG, Wheat LJ, Graninger W, Bow EJ, Holland SM, Kullberg BJ, Dismukes WE, De Pauw BE. 2008. Defining responses to therapy and study outcomes in clinical trials of invasive fungal diseases: Mycoses Study Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus criteria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:674–683. 10.1086/590566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. 2014. Undiagnosed invasive candidiasis: incorporating non-culture diagnostics into rational prophylactic and preemptive antifungal strategies. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 12:731–734. 10.1586/14787210.2014.919853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheng S, Clancy CJ, Hartman DJ, Hao B, Nguyen MH. 2014. Candida glabrata intra-abdominal candidiasis is characterized by persistence within the peritoneal cavity and abscesses. Infect. Immun. 82:3015–3022. 10.1128/IAI.00062-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goicoechea M, Fierer J, Johns S. 2004. Treatment of candidal cholangitis with caspofungin therapy in a patient with a liver transplant: documentation of biliary excretion of caspofungin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1040–1041. 10.1086/382082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamada N, Kumada K, Kishino S, Mochizuki N, Ohno K, Ogura S. 2011. Distribution of micafungin in the tissue fluids of patients with invasive fungal infections. J. Infect. Chemother. 17:731–734. 10.1007/s10156-011-0240-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sandhu P, Xu X, Bondiskey PJ, Balani SK, Morris ML, Tang YS, Miller AR, Pearson PG. 2004. Disposition of caspofungin, a novel antifungal agent, in mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1272–1280. 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1272-1280.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Louie A, Deziel M, Liu W, Drusano MF, Gumbo T, Drusano GL. 2005. Pharmacodynamics of caspofungin in a murine model of systemic candidiasis: importance of persistence of caspofungin in tissues to understanding drug activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:5058–5068. 10.1128/AAC.49.12.5058-5068.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES