Abstract
Periprosthetic infection remains a challenging clinical complication. We investigated the antibacterial properties of pure (99.9%) magnesium (Mg) in vitro and in an in vivo rat model of implant-related infection. Mg was highly effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis and improved new peri-implant bone formation. Bacterial icaA and agr RNAIII transcription levels were also assessed to characterize the mechanism underlying the antibacterial properties of the Mg implant.
TEXT
Artificial metal implants are widely used to repair bone injury due to fractures, tumor resection, and other causes. However, periprosthetic infections (PPI) are a clinically challenging complication, as the biomaterial implant surfaces serve as substrates for bacterial adhesion, colonization, and biofilm formation (1, 2). Prolonged antimicrobial treatment, implant removal, and surgical revision are often necessary to cure PPI, which leads to increased patient morbidity and places a substantial health care burden on society. Conventional PPI prevention relies on systemic antibiotics, which possess several disadvantages: (i) it is difficult to achieve an effective local antibiotic concentration without risking systemic toxicity, (ii) therapy is ineffective once the adherent bacteria have formed a biofilm on the implant surface, and (iii) they increase the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a common osteomyelitis-inducing pathogenic bacterium. Thus, many studies have focused on the development of novel medical biomaterials with antibacterial properties, such as metal implants, that prevent and/or treat implant-associated infection (3–6).
Pure magnesium plates were first introduced as orthopedic implants in 1907. Since then, this biodegradable magnesium-based metal and its alloy have been widely investigated for their utility as implant materials suitable for bone and cardiovascular applications due to their cytocompatibility and mechanical properties similar to those of natural bone (7–10). Previous investigations have found that the corrosion products of Mg degradation possess in vitro antibacterial function because they increase local alkalinity (11). These characteristics suggest that Mg-based metal could provide clinical utility as an orthopedic implant to prevent implant-associated infections. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of pure Mg (99.9%) against MRSA. Rat models of implant-related osteomyelitis (Sprague-Dawley rats) were implanted with pure Mg intramedullary nails. The efficacy of the nails for treating osteomyelitis and the amount of new peri-implant bone formation were evaluated. We also assessed bacterial icaA and agr RNAIII transcription to identify the mechanism underlying the antibacterial properties of pure Mg.
The in vitro antibacterial efficiency of Mg and titanium (Ti) sample discs (ϕ = 15 mm) was analyzed using the spread plate method (12, 13) after coculturing with MRSA (ATCC 43300) for 6, 12, and 24 h. Adherent bacteria were removed from the sample surfaces and recultured on BBL tryptone soy agar (TSA), then quantified by colony counting (data expressed in CFU). The Ti surfaces served as positive controls. After 24 h, the pure Mg surfaces exhibited the lowest levels of MRSA colonization (Fig. 1A) and exhibited bactericidal efficiency in comparison to Ti (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1B).
Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation were analyzed by confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) (Leica TCS SP2; Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Hitachi S-4800, CamScan) (Fig. 1C and D). The discs were stained with combination dye (LIVE/DEAD BacLight bacterial viability kits, catalog no. L13152; Molecular Probes) and observed by CLSM over time (Fig. 1C). Intense fluorescence on the Ti surfaces indicated a high level of biofilm formation, while pure Mg yielded fewer and smaller viable colonies. Twenty-four hours after coculture with MRSA, FESEM imaging of the Ti surfaces showed extensive colonization by spherical MRSA encased in a matrix suggestive of biofilm formation (Fig. 1D, Ti). In contrast, the Mg surfaces had only isolated, irregularly shaped individual bacteria (Fig. 1D, Mg).
Biofilms were stained with crystal violet according to the method of O'Toole et al. (14) (Fig. 1E). Sample surfaces were cocultured with MRSA for 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h and then stained with crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and solubilized in 95% ethyl alcohol (EtOH). Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using an automated plate reader (PerkinElmer). As expected, staining intensity was significantly higher on the Ti discs than on the Mg discs (Fig. 1E), indicating that pure Mg prevented MRSA biofilm formation.
Staphylococcal biofilm formation depends on synthesis of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), encoded by icaA (15–17). We examined icaA gene expression as an index of biofilm formation on Mg and Ti sample surfaces. Real-time PCR results showed that icaA was significantly downregulated in MRSA cultured with Mg versus that with Ti (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1F). We assume that this inhibition of icaA transcription resulted in the downregulation of PIA production, thereby reducing biofilm formation. We also measured the expression of the Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator RNAIII (agr RNAIII) in MRSA cocultures with Ti and Mg surfaces. The agr RNAIII locus regulates the production of several exoproteins and cell surface-associated proteins (18, 19). Regassa and Betley (18) found that alkaline pH represses the expression of agr RNAIII, consistent with our findings, in which agr RNAIII expression was significantly downregulated by coculturing with pure Mg (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1F). This result supports our hypothesis that the in vitro antibacterial property of Mg implants may be due to the increase in local alkalinity caused by Mg degradation.
In vivo, the right femur cavities of 5-month-old Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with pure Mg and Ti intramedullary nails (ϕ = 1.5 by 15 mm), which were precultured with MRSA (1 × 106 CFU/ml) for 24 h to induce implant-related osteomyelitis. These animals were designated the Mg and Ti experimental groups (Mg Exp and Ti Exp). Animals implanted with sterilized Mg and Ti nails were included as negative controls (Mg Ctrl and Ti Ctrl). Body temperatures remained stable in the Mg Exp animals but increased in the Ti Exp group during the follow-up period (Fig. 2B). Body weight decreased slightly in all groups during the first 4 weeks, but this was followed by a continuous weight gain in the Mg Exp group (Fig. 2B). Digital X-ray images of the posterior-anterior view were taken 8 weeks after surgery (Fig. 2A). The images showed osteomyelitis in the Ti Exp group, with bone destruction and new periosteal bone formation that were clearly worse than in the other three groups (Fig. 2A). There was no significant difference between the Mg Exp and Mg Ctrl groups (Fig. 2A). Consistent with these results, an area of concentrated 99mTc radioactivity was observed by emission computerized tomography (ECT) in the distal femur of Ti Exp animals (Fig. 2C, black arrow). This suggested local infection; there was no abnormal radiation uptake in the other three groups. These results suggest that the Mg implant can effectively protect the bone and surrounding tissues from MRSA infection.
It is noteworthy that new peri-implant bone formation was observed in the Mg Exp and Mg Ctrl groups (Fig. 2A). Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of new peri-implant femoral bone formation was analyzed by high-resolution micro-CT (Skyscan 1072; Skyscan, Aartselaar, Belgium) (Fig. 2D) (20). The results showed high bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and body volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and low total porosity and number of pores in the Mg Ctrl and Mg Exp groups versus the Ti Exp group (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2E to I). Quantification of bone parameters confirmed that Mg intramedullary nails prevent bone destruction induced by infection while promoting new bone formation around the implant.
Finally, we observed the implanted nails and surrounding bone tissue by FESEM and found that the Ti nail surfaces and bone tissue sites contained multiple bacterial colonies encased in a biofilm matrix (Fig. 3A). In contrast, virtually no bacteria were observed on the Mg nail surfaces and bone tissue (Fig. 3A). These results were confirmed by cultures of peri-implant bone tissues and implanted nails and analyzed by the conventional (21) and sonication (22) methods, respectively. Bacteria that were detached from the samples were recultured on TSA, and CFU were counted. MRSA growth was substantially inhibited on Mg nail surfaces and bone tissue sites compared to that on Ti nails (Fig. 3B and C).
We performed a systematic evaluation of the antibacterial properties of pure magnesium. The in vitro antibacterial assays demonstrated that an Mg implant reduced bacterial adhesion and prevented biofilm formation, most likely due to the increased local alkalinity caused by degradation of the metal. Implantation of an Mg intramedullary nail into the bone cavity of a rat protected the implant from bacterial contamination and improved new peri-implant bone formation. We suggest that biodegradable Mg-based biomaterials have a great potential for antibacterial orthopedic implant applications, to prevent and/or treat implant-associated infection, and thus to improve therapeutic efficacy and safety.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by grants from the Key National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB619101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81190133 and 81401852), the Natural Science Foundation of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (14ZR1424000), the Major Basic Research of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (11DJ1400303), the Clinical Medical Science and Technique Special Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Science and Technology (BL2014026), and the Xuzhou Medical Foundation for Youth Reserved Experts (2014006).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 6 October 2014
REFERENCES
- 1.Romano CL, Manzi G, Logoluso N, Romano D. 2012. Value of debridement and irrigation for the treatment of peri-prosthetic infections: a systematic review. Hip Int. 22(Suppl 8):S19–S24. 10.5301/HIP.2012.9566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Darouiche RO. 2004. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N. Engl. J. Med. 350:1422–1429. 10.1056/NEJMra035415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Lai BF, Ding C, Kizhakkedathu JN, Hancock RE, Wang R. 2013. Multilayered coating on titanium for controlled release of antimicrobial peptides for the prevention of implant-associated infections. Biomaterials 34:5969–5977. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li Y, Liu YZ, Long T, Yu XB, Tang TT, Dai KR, Tian B, Guo YP, Zhu ZA. 2013. Mesoporous bioactive glass as a drug delivery system: fabrication, bactericidal properties and biocompatibility. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 24:1951–1961. 10.1007/s10856-013-4960-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peng ZX, Tu B, Shen Y, Du L, Wang L, Guo SR, Tang TT. 2011. Quaternized chitosan inhibits icaA transcription and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus on a titanium surface. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:860–866. 10.1128/AAC.01005-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jin G, Qin H, Cao H, Qian S, Zhao Y, Peng X, Zhang X, Liu X, Chu PK. 2014. Synergistic effects of dual Zn/Ag ion implantation in osteogenic activity and antibacterial ability of titanium. Biomaterials 35:7699–7713. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G. 2006. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials 27:1728–1734. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huehnerschulte TA, Reifenrath J, von Rechenberg B, Dziuba D, Seitz JM, Bormann D, Windhagen H, Meyer-Lindenberg A. 2012. In vivo assessment of the host reactions to the biodegradation of the two novel magnesium alloys ZEK100 and AX30 in an animal model. Biomed. Eng. Online 11:14. 10.1186/1475-925X-11-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J, Bonnier J, de Bruyne B, Eberli FR, Erne P, Haude M, Heublein B, Horrigan M, Ilsley C, Bose D, Koolen J, Luscher TF, Weissman N, Waksman R, PROGRESS-AMS Investigators 2007. Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 369:1869–1875. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60853-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Witte F, Feyerabend F, Maier P, Fischer J, Stormer M, Blawert C, Dietzel W, Hort N. 2007. Biodegradable magnesium-hydroxyapatite metal matrix composites. Biomaterials 28:2163–2174. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robinson DA, Griffith RW, Shechtman D, Evans RB, Conzemius MG. 2010. In vitro antibacterial properties of magnesium metal against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Biomater. 6:1869–1877. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tan H, Peng Z, Li Q, Xu X, Guo S, Tang T. 2012. The use of quaternised chitosan-loaded PMMA to inhibit biofilm formation and downregulate the virulence-associated gene expression of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus. Biomaterials 33:365–377. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu T, Hua X, He Z, Wang X, Yu X, Ren W. 2012. The bactericidal and biocompatible characteristics of reinforced calcium phosphate cements. Biomed. Mater. 7:045003. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.O'Toole GA, Pratt LA, Watnick PI, Newman DK, Weaver VB, Kolter R. 1999. Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 310:91–109. 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)10008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Baldassarri L, Donati ME, Pirini V, Gamberini S, Montanaro L. 2006. Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections: comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76:425–430. 10.1002/jbm.a.30552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rohde H, Frankenberger S, Zahringer U, Mack D. 2010. Structure, function and contribution of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 89:103–111. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. 2001. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2151–2156. 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Regassa LB, Betley MJ. 1992. Alkaline pH decreases expression of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 174:5095–5100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hild N, Tawakoli PN, Halter JG, Sauer B, Buchalla W, Stark WJ, Mohn D. 2013. pH-dependent antibacterial effects on oral microorganisms through pure PLGA implants and composites with nanosized bioactive glass. Acta Biomater. 9:9118–9125. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wedemeyer C, Xu J, Neuerburg C, Landgraeber S, Malyar NM, von Knoch F, Gosheger G, von Knoch M, Loer F, Saxler G. 2007. Particle-induced osteolysis in three-dimensional micro-computed tomography. Calcif. Tissue Int. 81:394–402. 10.1007/s00223-007-9077-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lucke M, Schmidmaier G, Sadoni S, Wildemann B, Schiller R, Haas NP, Raschke M. 2003. Gentamicin coating of metallic implants reduces implant-related osteomyelitis in rats. Bone 32:521–531. 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. 2007. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:654–663. 10.1056/NEJMoa061588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]