Significance
Peptide fragments of Nep1-like proteins (NLPs), occurring in diverse microorganisms of three different kingdoms of life, were found to trigger immunity in the model plant Arabidopsis, indicating that they act as a microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP). A synthetic peptide of 24 aa from the central part of the downy mildew HaNLP3 protein was found to activate the plant immune system and trigger resistance to this pathogen. Strikingly, not only peptides of oomycete NLPs, but also those of bacteria and fungi were shown to act as a MAMP. This unprecedented broad taxonomic distribution demonstrates that the occurrence of a MAMP is not necessarily restricted to a class of microorganisms but can occur in a wide range of species from the tree of life.
Keywords: plant immunity, microbe-associated molecular pattern, Nep1-like protein, plant-associated microbe, biotrophic pathogen
Abstract
Necrosis and ethylene-inducing peptide 1 (Nep1)-like proteins (NLPs) are secreted by a wide range of plant-associated microorganisms. They are best known for their cytotoxicity in dicot plants that leads to the induction of rapid tissue necrosis and plant immune responses. The biotrophic downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis encodes 10 different noncytotoxic NLPs (HaNLPs) that do not cause necrosis. We discovered that these noncytotoxic NLPs, however, act as potent activators of the plant immune system in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ectopic expression of HaNLP3 in Arabidopsis triggered resistance to H. arabidopsidis, activated the expression of a large set of defense-related genes, and caused a reduction of plant growth that is typically associated with strongly enhanced immunity. N- and C-terminal deletions of HaNLP3, as well as amino acid substitutions, pinpointed to a small central region of the protein that is required to trigger immunity, indicating the protein acts as a microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP). This was confirmed in experiments with a synthetic peptide of 24 aa, derived from the central part of HaNLP3 and corresponding to a conserved region in type 1 NLPs that induces ethylene production, a well-known MAMP response. Strikingly, corresponding 24-aa peptides of fungal and bacterial type 1 NLPs were also able to trigger immunity in Arabidopsis. The widespread phylogenetic distribution of type 1 NLPs makes this protein family (to our knowledge) the first proteinaceous MAMP identified in three different kingdoms of life.
Immune responses in plants generally start by receptor-mediated detection of nonself molecules that are conserved among different classes of microbes, both beneficial and pathogenic (1). These molecules often have essential functions in microbial fitness (2) and are known as microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). Upon their perception by the plant, MAMPs trigger basal immune responses (3), e.g., ethylene biosynthesis, production of reactive oxygen species, release of antimicrobial compounds (4), and in certain cases programmed cell death (2). Collectively, these responses contribute to resistance against nonadapted pathogens [MAMP-triggered immunity (MTI)].
MAMPs of plant-infecting microbes have been described for bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes. Three characterized bacterial MAMPs are flagellin (5), EF-Tu (6), and peptidoglycan (7). Flagellin is the main protein of the bacterial flagellum, which is used by eubacteria for movement. A highly conserved fragment of 22 aa, named flg22 (5), is sufficient to activate MTI in Arabidopsis and other plant species. Elongation factor thermo unstable (EF-Tu) is an abundant and conserved bacterial protein that plays a central role in the elongation phase of protein synthesis. An 18-aa domain of EF-Tu, named elf18, is recognized as a MAMP in Brassicaceae species, but not in other tested plant families (6). Peptidoglycan (PGN), the third characterized bacterial MAMP, is a major structural component of most bacterial cell walls. PGN, consisting of strands of alternating N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid residues, triggers immunity in Arabidopsis (7). An important fungal MAMP is chitin, a structural component of all fungal cell walls. Plants are able to recognize chitin, and fragments of 4–10 N-acetylglucosamine residues are the most potent inducers of defense (8). Recently, a second fungal MAMP was identified, a secreted polygalacturonase of Botrytis cinerea that triggers immunity in Arabidopsis (9).
Four oomycete-derived MAMPs have been identified to date (10): (i) heptaglucoside fragments, originating from branched β-glucans that are major cell wall polysaccharides, and that trigger defense responses in many Fabaceous plants (11); (ii) glycoprotein 42, a calcium-dependent transglutaminase that functions in irreversible protein cross-linking and is abundant in Phytophthora cell walls, and a 13-aa peptide fragment thereof that elicit MTI responses in parsley (12) and potato (13); (iii) elicitins, secreted proteins with sterol-binding activity (14), which provoke necrosis in Nicotiana plants through induction of cell death (15); and (iv) the Phytophthora cellulose-binding elicitor lectin, which is thought to cause perturbation of the cell wall cellulose status, thereby triggering necrosis and MTI in tobacco and Arabidopsis (16, 17). Other groups of cell death-inducing proteins may also qualify as MAMPs based on their widespread occurrence among different pathogens (2), e.g., the Crinklers and the cytotoxic necrosis and ethylene-inducing peptide 1 (Nep1)-like proteins (NLPs) (10).
Two major NLP types are found in bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes (18, 19) and are known to cause rapid necrosis and ethylene production in many dicot, but not in monocot plant species (18, 20). Type 2 NLPs differ from type 1 by an additional conserved second cysteine bridge and putative calcium-binding domain (19). In Arabidopsis, cytotoxic NLPs were found to activate immunity-related gene expression, which strongly overlapped with that induced by flg22 (21, 22). However, it was suggested that immune responses resulted from cytotoxicity. Moreover, necrosis was only induced upon treatment with the complete NLP protein (23). In vitro, cytotoxic NLPs cause rapid leakage of dicot membrane-derived vesicles, suggesting a direct cytolytic activity (24). The immunogenic effect of NLPs was therefore suggested to result from direct cellular damage (24), or release of damage-associated molecular patterns (3).
Several plant-infecting oomycetes have large expansions of NLPs in their genomes (25–27), suggesting that these proteins play an important role in the pathogen’s lifestyle. A clear virulence function was observed for NLPPcc of the rot bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum (27). Also, individual deletion of two NLP genes in the fungus Verticillium dahliae resulted in reduced virulence on different host plants (28). Five other NLP genes in this fungus encode noncytotoxic proteins (29), a phenomenon that is also observed in oomycetes. When tested by transient expression in tobacco, necrosis was only induced by 1 out of 3 tested NLPs of Phytophthora infestans (30), 8 out of 33 NLPs of Phytophthora sojae (31), whereas not a single 1 of 10 NLPs of Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis tested caused necrosis (26). In contrast to cytotoxic NLPs that are mainly expressed during necrotrophic stages of infection, noncytotoxic NLPs appear to be expressed early during infection (26, 30), suggesting they serve an, as-yet-unknown, function during penetration or initial colonization of the host.
In our search for the biological function of noncytotoxic NLPs of H. arabidopsidis, transgenic HaNLP-expressing Arabidopsis plants were generated that were severely stunted. In this paper, we show that Arabidopsis responds to noncytotoxic HaNLPs and small peptide fragments thereof that are highly conserved in type 1 NLPs. The peptides activate ethylene production and other typical MAMP-triggered defense responses, but not tissue necrosis, indicating they act as a MAMP. NLPs are not restricted to a single class of microbes but present in a broad range of mostly plant-associated microbes (bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes) belonging to three kingdoms of life, making this a MAMP with an unprecedented broad taxonomic occurrence.
Results
HaNLP Expression in Arabidopsis Leads to Severe Growth Reduction and Resistance to Downy Mildew.
H. arabidopsidis, the downy mildew pathogen of Arabidopsis, has an expanded family of 10 different NLP genes that encode noncytotoxic secreted proteins (26). To determine whether the HaNLPs would facilitate the infection process and enhance disease susceptibility of Arabidopsis, transgenic HaNLP overexpression lines were created. Surprisingly, overexpression of 7 of the 10 NLP genes (HaNLP2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10) resulted in transgenic plants showing severely reduced growth, compared with control plants transformed with Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) (Fig. 1A). Plants expressing HaNLP1, 7, and 8 showed no, or limited growth reduction, which was not significantly different from the YFP-expressing control. All other transgenic lines, except for HaNLP5-expressing plants, produced seeds and were tested in the next generation (T3) by weighing the aerial parts of 10 seedlings per NLP-expressing line. NLP-induced weight reduction confirmed the growth effects observed on individual T2 plants (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
HaNLP expression in Arabidopsis leads to growth reduction and enhanced resistance to downy mildew. (A) The result of reduced growth is visible as the smaller sizes of representative T3 transgenic Arabidopsis lines (21 d old) expressing HaNLP2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 10, but not of those expressing HaNLP1, 7, 8, and the YFP control. (B) The reduction in growth was quantified as fresh weight of the aerial parts of T3 seedlings [n = 10, with standard deviation (SD)]. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing HaNLP5 died before day 21. (C) Transgenic T3 lines that showed growth reduction also showed enhanced resistance to the downy mildew H. arabidopsidis isolate Waco9, as measured by counting the number of spores per milligram of fresh-weight above-ground tissue (with SD). Plants were inoculated at 14 d after germination, and spores counted 6 d postinoculation (n = 10; the experiment was repeated three times with similar results). Significance of differences in the level of sporulation was assessed with the Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test and indicated with “a” and “b” (α = 0.05).
HaNLP-expressing plants showed strongly reduced susceptibility to the downy mildew H. arabidopsidis (Fig. 1C), and strikingly, these same lines also showed severe growth reduction. There was a strong correlation (R2 = 0.89) between the level of susceptibility and the fresh weight of the transgenic lines expressing different HaNLP genes. In the literature, there is a multitude of examples of plant growth inhibition as a result of activation of plant immunity (32). The fact that the level of immunity of the HaNLP-expressing plants is well correlated to their growth inhibition, therefore, suggests that activation of plant immunity causes the observed growth reduction.
HaNLP3 Is a Potent Activator of Plant Immunity.
As the observed activation of plant immunity in 35S:HaNLP-expressing plants could be the result of continuous overexpression, we created an estradiol-inducible line (containing an XVE:HaNLP3 construct). HaNLP3 was chosen for this as we studied this protein in more detail previously (26). A transgenic line was selected that showed no detectable HaNLP3 expression in untreated plants and a strong induction upon treatment with estradiol. When sprayed with estradiol every 2 d for a period of 2 wk, these plants showed strongly reduced growth, similar to that of the 35S:HaNLP3 lines, whereas non–estradiol-treated plants developed normally (Fig. S1). A control estradiol-inducible YFP line (XVE:YFP) did not show any growth reduction upon estradiol treatment. These data clearly indicate that growth reduction indeed results from exposure of plants to HaNLP3. The same lines were next used to investigate the effect of HaNLP3 expression on H. arabidopsidis infection. For this, the inducible XVE:HaNLP3 and XVE:YFP lines, which were phenotypically identical, were sprayed with water or estradiol 24 h before inoculation. A very strong reduction in susceptibility was observed in the estradiol-induced HaNLP3 line, but not in the YFP control line or water-treated HaNLP3 line (Fig. 2A). These data strongly support the idea that HaNLP3 triggers the plant immune system, resulting in resistance to H. arabidopsidis.
Fig. 2.
Estradiol-induced expression of HaNLP3 in Arabidopsis results in the activation of immunity to downy mildew and defense-associated gene expression. (A) Susceptibility of estradiol-inducible HaNLP3 and YFP lines of Arabidopsis to H. arabidopsidis as measured by counting the number of spores per milligram of fresh-weight above-ground tissue (with SD). Arabidopsis seedlings were sprayed with either water or 100 μM estradiol 24 h before inoculation with H. arabidopsidis Waco9. Spore counts were performed 6 d after inoculation. Significance of differences in the level of sporulation was assessed with a Tukey HSD test (n = 4; the experiment was repeated three times with similar results). Significant differences between the lines is indicated with “a” and “b” (α = 0.05). (B) Venn diagram showing the overlap in Arabidopsis genes that are activated in response to different inducers of plant defense responses with the 1,305 genes that are activated by HaNLP3 (blue). flg22-induced genes (864; red) are up-regulated 1 h and/or 4 h after treatment with flg22 peptide (22). BTH-induced genes (1,129; green) are activated at 24 h after treatment with BTH (33).
The question why transient expression of HaNLP3 leads to immunity to H. arabidopsidis was addressed by analyzing gene expression changes at 24 h after induction of the HaNLP3 transgene with estradiol. The expression of HaNLP3 resulted in a strong transcriptional response (Dataset S1); 2,586 genes were significantly (q value, <0.05) differentially expressed (at least fourfold) between estradiol- and water-treated seedlings of XVE:HaNLP3, of which 1,305 genes showed enhanced expression (more than fourfold up) and 1,281 genes were down-regulated (more than fourfold down). Comparing the 1,305 HaNLP3-induced gene set to other publicly available data showed that there was a strong overlap with genes up-regulated in response to the flagellin-derived MAMP flg22 (22), and to BTH (33), a salicylic acid analog that activates plant immune responses (Fig. 2B). The fact that HaNLP3 activates immunity-related gene expression, as well as resistance to downy mildew, strongly suggests that the protein acts as a MAMP.
Defense Induction in Arabidopsis by Recombinant NLPs.
The observed induction of defense could be caused by artificial in planta production of high levels of the secreted HaNLP3 protein. We therefore tested whether recombinant HaNLP3 protein, delivered extracellularly in the leaf intercellular space, would activate plant immune responses, e.g., the defense gene PR-1. For this, HaNLP3 was produced in Pichia pastoris and the purified protein infiltrated in leaves of an Arabidopsis promoter PR-1:GUS reporter line. Leaves infiltrated with HaNLP3 showed a high β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity, indicating that the PR-1 promoter is strongly activated, similar to leaves infiltrated with the flg22 peptide that is a potent MAMP in Arabidopsis (Fig. 3). In contrast, the control sample, PIC3 (P. pastoris empty vector control, purified in the same way as HaNLP3), as well as the buffer control, showed very little GUS activity. This experiment clearly shows that extracellular exposure of plant cells to HaNLP3 activates plant immune responses.
Fig. 3.
Recombinant HaNLP3 protein activates PR-1 expression. Induction of defense in Arabidopsis leaves was measured by staining for GUS expression in leaves of pPR-1:GUS Arabidopsis plants infiltrated with recombinant HaNLP3 protein (0.5 μM), a control sample (PIC3), flg22 peptide (0.5 μM), and water (Mock). GUS staining was performed at 24 h after infiltration.
A Fragment of HaNLP3 Is Sufficient to Induce Plant Growth Reduction.
Proteinaceous MAMPs, e.g., flagellin or EF-Tu, are often recognized through smaller protein epitopes. To test whether smaller NLP fragments can still act as MAMPs, we made N- and C-terminal deletions and substitutions in HaNLP3 and expressed them in transgenic Arabidopsis lines, measuring plant growth reduction as a proxy for activation of immune responses (Fig. 4A). Disruption of the disulfide bridge, which is essential for toxicity of cytolytic NLPs (23), by substitution of the first cysteine residue by serine (C79S), did not reduce the growth-inhibiting effect of HaNLP3. Deletion of a 26-aa region between the two conserved cysteine residues also did not affect HaNLP3-induced growth reduction. Transgenic expression of successive C-terminal deletions of HaNLP3 resulted in a reduced growth phenotype for fragments 1–4, whereas further C-terminal deletions did no longer have a negative effect on plant growth (fragments 5–8). This suggested that sequences N-terminal of the heptapeptide motif are important for HaNLP3-induced growth reduction. Fragment 4, which ends with the heptapeptide motif, was further reduced in size by successive N-terminal deletions while leaving the signal peptide intact. Expression of fragments 9–12 in Arabidopsis showed that fragments 9 and 10, but not 11 and 12, reduced growth when expressed in transgenic plants. A 28-aa fragment of HaNLP3 (fragment 10) is thus sufficient to cause the growth effect. This fragment contains two regions that are highly conserved in type 1 NLPs (Fig. 4B): conserved region I starting with the AIMY amino acid sequence, and conserved region II matching the heptapeptide motif. The corresponding conserved region I in the structure of NLPPya is fully located inside of the protein, whereas the heptapeptide motif (conserved region II) is partly surface exposed (Fig. S2). Nevertheless, native recombinant HaNLP3 protein induces ethylene production in Arabidopsis, a well-known MAMP response (Fig. S3). Interestingly, heat-denatured HaNLP3 (boiled for 1 h) was an approximately three times more potent inducer of ethylene production (EC50 = 0.2 μM) than native recombinant protein (EC50 = 0.5 μM), suggesting the immunogenic epitope is not fully exposed in the native protein.
Fig. 4.
A conserved region from the central part of HaNLP3 is sufficient for MAMP-associated growth reduction. (A) Schematic representation of substituted and deleted versions of the HaNLP3 protein (showing the signal peptide, “SP”; glutamine-rich region, “Q-RICH”; cysteine residues, “C”; and heptapeptide motif, “7”) and their effect on growth when overexpressed in transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings. Multiple T1 lines per construct were scored for growth reduction (with “+” indicating strong growth reduction and “−” indicating no growth reduction) following transformation of the different 35S:HaNLP3 variants. Fragment 10 contains the minimal region of 28 aa that is still able to induce MAMP-associated growth reduction. (B) A 24-aa peptide is conserved in type 1 NLPs from oomycetes, fungi, and bacteria (red-lined box). The 11-residue conserved region I is less conserved in type 2 NLPs. The second conserved region in the 28-aa fragment is the GHRHDWE heptapeptide that is characteristic for the NLP family, and that is conserved in both type 1 and type 2 NLPs. The weblogo is based on 378 type 1 NLP sequences and 122 type 2 NLP sequences (19).
Synthetic NLP Peptides Trigger Immunity.
A synthetic peptide of 24 residues (nlp24) was made that contains both conserved region I and II, but lacks the first 4 aa of the 28-aa peptide that are not conserved in type 1 NLPs (Fig. 4B). nlp24 appeared to be a strong inducer of ethylene production in Arabidopsis (Fig. 5A), confirming that this HaNLP3 peptide is sufficient to trigger an immune response. To investigate whether peptide fragments of other microbial NLPs also act as MAMPs in Arabidopsis, the corresponding nlp24 peptides of BcNEP2 (of the fungus B. cinerea) and BsNPP1 (of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis) were tested and found to induce ethylene production in Arabidopsis (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the corresponding 26-aa peptide of the type 2 NLP of P. carotovorum (NLPPcc) did not induce ethylene production. Similarly, the nlp24 peptide of HaNLP3, but not the nlp26 peptide of NLPPcc, was a strong inducer of GUS expression in the Arabidopsis promoter PR-1:GUS reporter line (Fig. S4). It is striking to see that nlp24 is the most conserved part (containing both conserved region I and II) in type 1 NLPs of bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes, as illustrated by alignment of HaNLP3, BcNEP2, and BsNPP1 (Fig. S5). In contrast, conserved region I of type 2 NLPs differs at several amino acid positions from that of type 1 NLPs, whereas the heptapeptide motif is highly conserved in the two NLP types (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 5.
Synthetic 24-aa NLP peptides (nlp24) induce MAMP responses and trigger immunity to downy mildew. (A) Ethylene production in Arabidopsis is induced in response to nlp24 peptides (1 μM) of HaNLP3, BcNEP2, and BsNPP1, but not to the nlp26 fragment of the type 2 NLPPcc. Leaf pieces were incubated for 4 h in buffered peptide solution before ethylene concentrations were determined (n = 3; SD is indicated and the experiment was performed three times with similar results). (B) Resistance to H. arabidopsidis in Arabidopsis is induced by nlp24 (100 nM) of HaNLP3, BcNEP2, and BsNPP1, but not of the type 2 NLPPcc. The numbers of conidiophores per leaf is a measure of susceptibility. Leaves of 4.5-wk–old Arabidopsis plant were infiltrated with nlp24 peptides 1 d before inoculation with downy mildew isolate Noco2. Conidiophore counts were performed 10 d after inoculation. Significance of differences in the level of sporulation (with SE) was assessed with a Tukey HSD test (n = 44) and significant differences between lines are indicated with “a” and “b” (α = 0.01).
To study whether nlp24 peptides also trigger immunity in Arabidopsis, we pretreated leaves with 100 nM peptide 1 d before inoculation with the downy mildew H. arabidopsidis Noco2. The nlp24 peptides corresponding to HaNLP3, BcNEP2, and BsNPP1 induced a strong immune response, resulting in resistance to Noco2. In contrast, treatment with the peptide of NLPPcc did not reduce susceptibility to downy mildew, but resulted in sporulation levels similar to that of mock-treated leaves (Fig. 5B). Our data show that peptides derived from type 1 NLPs of microbes occurring in three kingdoms of life are recognized as MAMPs by Arabidopsis and trigger effective immune responses.
nlp24 Peptides Are Diverse and Tolerant to Substitutions.
The HaNLPs, when transgenically expressed in Arabidopsis, trigger different levels of immunity. To test whether this is caused by differences in affinity, the EC50 values for ethylene production were determined (Table 1). For NLP2, 4, 5, 6, and 10, the EC50 values were in the range of 0.1–0.2 μM, similar to that obtained for nlp24 of HaNLP3, and of the heat-denatured HaNLP3 protein (0.2 μM). However, the EC50 values were higher for HaNLP1, 7, 8, and 9 (range of 0.4–0.6 μM). Their reduced activity could explain the lower effect on growth in transgenic plants transformed with HaNLP1, 7, and 8, but not for HaNLP9 (Fig. 1).
Table 1.
Half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) of different nlp24-based peptides for the induction of ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis
![]() |
Values were determined for nlp24 peptides of 10 different HaNLPs, for truncated versions and alanine substitutions of HaNLP3, as well as for nlp24- and nlp11-based peptides for BcNEP2, BsNPP1, NLPPcc, and NLPPya. EC50 data were based on three measurements for each of six peptide concentration tested, repeated three times with similar results.
We next tested the minimal peptide length and composition by measuring ethylene production in response to truncated peptides and alanine-substituted versions of nlp24 (HaNLP3) (Table 1). Activity was not affected when the first 2 aa (AI) were not included (nlp22), but was strongly reduced when the first 4 aa (AIMY) were absent (nlp20). Deletion of the C-terminal heptapeptide motif from nlp24 (in nlp17) did not increase the EC50 value. Further C-terminal truncated forms were still active, including an 11-aa peptide with the sequence AIMYAWYFPKD (nlp11) that corresponds to conserved region I (Fig. 5B) and even had a slightly lower EC50 of 0.1 μM. Removal of the first 2 aa of nlp11 resulted in a peptide (nlp9) that was 40 times less active. Ethylene-inducing activity of alanine substitutions in the conserved region I of nlp24 showed that methionine at position 3 of the peptide is required for full activity. Two other substitutions, of tyrosine 7 and aspartic acid 11, resulted in peptides with slightly reduced activity. Substitution of histidine 19, which is highly conserved in NLPs and is required for necrosis induction by cytolytic NLPs (24), did not result in a decreased EC50 value, confirming that conserved region I, but not II, is required for MAMP activity of NLPs.
The bacterial BsNPP1 and fungal BcNEP2 peptides are 5–10 times more potent triggers of ethylene production than nlp24 of HaNLP3. In contrast, the 26-aa peptide of the type 2 NLPPcc had a very high EC50 value (>10 μM) and is clearly not acting as a MAMP in Arabidopsis. This was confirmed for nlp11 peptides that show slightly lower EC50 values than HaNLP3 for BcNEP2, BsNPP1, and NLPPya, but again a very high EC50 for NLPPcc. The data presented demonstrate that microbial NLPs, occurring in three kingdoms of life, act as MAMPs, making this an immunity-triggering protein family of unprecedented broad taxonomic distribution.
Discussion
NLPs Act as MAMPs.
The discovery that noncytotoxic NLPs activate immunity in Arabidopsis was made while searching for a virulence function of these proteins in the downy mildew H. arabidopsidis (26). When transgenically expressed in Arabidopsis, 7 of the 10 HaNLPs induced severe growth reduction that resembled that of documented Arabidopsis autoimmune mutants, e.g., cpr1 and cpr5 (34, 35), suggesting that the secreted proteins activate plant immunity. Inducible expression of HaNLP3 resulted in the activation of many well-known immunity-related genes, which are also activated by the flg22 MAMP and the defense hormone salicylic acid (or its analog BTH). By creating C- and N-terminal truncations of HaNLP3, a 28-aa fragment was pinpointed as sufficient for MAMP-associated growth reduction. This fragment could be further reduced to a synthetic peptide of 24 aa that was sufficient to induce MAMP responses, e.g., ethylene production, and immunity to H. arabidopsidis.
The nlp24 peptide is strongly conserved in both cytotoxic and noncytotoxic type 1 NLPs. Conserved region I (of 11 aa) contains the immunogenic part of nlp24. In the fungal VdNLP2 protein, this region was analyzed in more detail by Zhou et al. (29), who observed that alanine substitution of six different amino acid residues resulted in loss or reduction of necrosis induction by this cytotoxic type 1 NLP. The fact that region I is also strongly conserved in noncytolytic NLPs, in particular those of the Arabidopsis pathogen H. arabidopsidis, suggest that this region is also important for a, so-far-unknown, noncytotoxic function related to virulence. A synthetic peptide (nlp26) of the type 2 NLPPcc does not induce ethylene production in Arabidopsis, nor does it trigger immunity to downy mildew. This suggests that perception of NLPs is specific for type 1 NLPs (although we do not rule out that other type 2 NLPs can trigger immunity in Arabidopsis). The cause for this may be that conserved region I of type 2 NLPs differs from that of type 1 NLPs (Fig. 4B).
Activation of immune responses by cytolytic NLPs has always been causally linked to their toxic activity (22, 23). Ottmann et al. (24) demonstrated that the purified NLPPp protein caused membrane leakage in vesicles from dicots, indicating the protein has a cytolytic activity. The immune response was suggested to result from cellular damage, or the release of damage-associated molecular patterns. The finding that Arabidopsis mounts an effective immune response to only a small, highly conserved, peptide of noncytotoxic and cytotoxic type 1 NLPs demonstrates that cellular damage is not required for NLP-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis. However, the fact that the type 2 NLPPcc induces immune responses in Arabidopsis, but its internal peptide fragment is not recognized as a MAMP, suggests that cytotoxic NLPs also activate immunity through a different mechanism.
NLP Recognition in Arabidopsis.
In their natural environment, Arabidopsis plants are exposed to a wide range of microbial organisms, a few of which are known to cause disease under field conditions (36). Of these natural pathogens, the downy mildew H. arabidopsidis is the only one, known so far, that contains NLP genes. As pathogens are known to be important in shaping the evolution of host species, it is tempting to speculate that Arabidopsis has evolved the capability to detect NLPs as a mechanism to protect itself from downy mildew infection. The NLP-triggered immune response is clearly effective as pretreatment of plants with NLP proteins or peptides provide protection against downy mildew infection. Nevertheless, in untreated plants, H. arabidopsidis can overcome these defenses, as it is able to cause disease. We envision that, during its coevolution with Arabidopsis, the downy mildew has evolved effectors that suppress NLP-triggered immunity, a specific form of MTI. Candidate effectors of H. arabidopsidis for this suppression are the well-known host-translocated RXLR proteins that are encoded by an estimated 130–150 genes in this oomycete (37). A large number of these RXLRs have been identified as effective suppressors of defense responses and MTI (38–43), and could suppress the early responses induced by NLPs.
MAMPs are generally recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that are either receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and/or receptor like-proteins (RLPs) (44). A peptide fragment of 10–25 aa is, in most cases, sufficient for triggering immunity, e.g., flg22 (5), Pep13 (13), and elf18 (6). The specificity of the ligand is determined by the receptor, but often a coreceptor, e.g., BAK1 (45) or SOBIR1 (9, 46), is required for signal transduction. Other host factors could be required for the recognition of nlp24, as the peptide fragment is predicted not to be surface exposed, but located on the inside of the protein (Fig. S2), based on the structure of the type 1 NLPPya protein (24). This suggests that it cannot directly be recognized by a cognate receptor, but requires (partial) degradation of the protein, likely by host proteases.
NLP MAMPs Occur in Microorganisms of Three Kingdoms of Life.
MAMPs have been defined as “highly conserved molecules within a class of microbes and to contribute to general microbial fitness” (2). Some MAMPs are so important to microbes that they cannot thrive without the associated molecules. In Phytophthora and downy mildew species, belonging to the oomycetes, NLP genes have considerably expanded in number, suggesting they contribute to the lifestyle of these pathogens. It is striking to see that the NLP immunogenic region of 24 aa (nlp24) is highly conserved in type 1 NLPs. Substitutions in the nlp24 region of the fungal VdNLP2 protein in most cases led to loss of cytotoxicity, indicating the region has an important function (29). The observed conservation of the recognized NLP peptide is important for the efficiency and durability of MTI and makes the application of NLP-triggered immunity to generate resistance to nonadapted phytopathogens promising.
NLPs are unique in their extremely wide taxonomic occurrence, suggesting they are advantageous to many different microbial species. Our finding of NLPs acting as proteinaceous MAMPs in Arabidopsis clearly shows that these recognized molecules are not confined to a single class of microbes; they are found in oomycetes, bacteria, and fungi. Therefore, the definition of MAMPs could be broadened to “highly conserved molecules found in microbes.” The widespread occurrence of this class of secreted proteins, in particular in plant-associated microorganisms, makes their role as MAMPs highly relevant.
Materials and Methods
Generation of Transgenic Lines.
The HaNLP coding sequences were amplified from H. arabidopsidis genomic DNA (primers listed in Table S1), cloned in plant transformation vectors, and used for stable transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants as described in SI Materials and Methods.
Microarray Analysis.
RNA, of 10-d–old Arabidopsis seedlings containing either XVE:HaNLP3 or XVE:YFP and induced by spraying with estradiol solution, was used for microarray analysis as described in SI Materials and Methods.
All other methods are described in SI Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Joyce Elberse and Nick Sanders for technical assistance, and Inez Terpstra for microarray data analysis. This work was partly financed by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant Nu 70/9-1.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1410031111/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Zamioudis C, Pieterse CMJ. Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25(2):139–150. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thomma BPHJ, Nürnberger T, Joosten MHAJ. Of PAMPs and effectors: The blurred PTI-ETI dichotomy. Plant Cell. 2011;23(1):4–15. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: Perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:379–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsuda K, Katagiri F. Comparing signaling mechanisms engaged in pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13(4):459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Felix G, Duran JD, Volko S, Boller T. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J. 1999;18(3):265–276. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kunze G, et al. The N terminus of bacterial elongation factor Tu elicits innate immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell. 2004;16(12):3496–3507. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gust AA, et al. Bacteria-derived peptidoglycans constitute pathogen-associated molecular patterns triggering innate immunity in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(44):32338–32348. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704886200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Felix G, Regenass M, Boller T. Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: Induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. Plant J. 1993;4(2):307–316. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang L, et al. Fungal endopolygalacturonases are recognized as microbe-associated molecular patterns by the Arabidopsis receptor-like protein RESPONSIVENESS TO BOTRYTIS POLYGALACTURONASES1. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(1):352–364. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.230698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hein I, Gilroy EM, Armstrong MR, Birch PRJ. The zig-zag-zig in oomycete-plant interactions. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(4):547–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00547.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fliegmann J, Mithofer A, Wanner G, Ebel J. An ancient enzyme domain hidden in the putative beta-glucan elicitor receptor of soybean may play an active part in the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns during broad host resistance. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(2):1132–1140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308552200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nürnberger T, et al. High affinity binding of a fungal oligopeptide elicitor to parsley plasma membranes triggers multiple defense responses. Cell. 1994;78(3):449–460. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90423-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brunner F, et al. Pep-13, a plant defense-inducing pathogen-associated pattern from Phytophthora transglutaminases. EMBO J. 2002;21(24):6681–6688. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamoun S. A catalogue of the effector secretome of plant pathogenic oomycetes. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44:41–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sasabe M, et al. Independent pathways leading to apoptotic cell death, oxidative burst and defense gene expression in response to elicitin in tobacco cell suspension culture. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267(16):5005–5013. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Séjalon-Delmas N, et al. Purification, elicitor activity, and cell wall localization of a glycoprotein from Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae, a fungal pathogen of tobacco. Phytopathology. 1997;87(9):899–909. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.9.899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gaulin E, et al. Cellulose binding domains of a Phytophthora cell wall protein are novel pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Plant Cell. 2006;18(7):1766–1777. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.038687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gijzen M, Nürnberger T. Nep1-like proteins from plant pathogens: Recruitment and diversification of the NPP1 domain across taxa. Phytochemistry. 2006;67(16):1800–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oome S, Van den Ackerveken G. Comparative and functional analysis of the widely occurring family of Nep1-like proteins. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2014;27(10):1081–1094. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-14-0118-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bailey BA. Purification of a protein from culture filtrates of Fusarium oxysporum that induces ethylene and necrosis in leaves of Erythroxylum coca. Phytopathology. 1995;85(10):1250–1255. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bae H, Kim MS, Sicher RC, Bae H-J, Bailey BA. Necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide from Fusarium oxysporum induces a complex cascade of transcripts associated with signal transduction and cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006;141(3):1056–1067. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.076869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Qutob D, et al. Phytotoxicity and innate immune responses induced by Nep1-like proteins. Plant Cell. 2006;18(12):3721–3744. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fellbrich G, et al. NPP1, a Phytophthora-associated trigger of plant defense in parsley and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;32(3):375–390. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ottmann C, et al. A common toxin fold mediates microbial attack and plant defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(25):10359–10364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902362106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Seidl MF, Van den Ackerveken G, Govers F, Snel B. A domain-centric analysis of oomycete plant pathogen genomes reveals unique protein organization. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(2):628–644. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cabral A, et al. Nontoxic Nep1-like proteins of the downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis: Repression of necrosis-inducing activity by a surface-exposed region. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25(5):697–708. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-11-0269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mattinen L, Tshuikina M, Mäe A, Pirhonen M. Identification and characterization of Nip, necrosis-inducing virulence protein of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004;17(12):1366–1375. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.12.1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Santhanam P, et al. Evidence for functional diversification within a fungal NEP1-like protein family. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013;26(3):278–286. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-12-0222-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou B-J, Jia P-S, Gao F, Guo H-S. Molecular characterization and functional analysis of a necrosis- and ethylene-inducing, protein-encoding gene family from Verticillium dahliae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25(7):964–975. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-11-0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kanneganti T-D, Huitema E, Cakir C, Kamoun S. Synergistic interactions of the plant cell death pathways induced by Phytophthora infestans Nepl-like protein PiNPP1.1 and INF1 elicitin. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(8):854–863. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dong S, et al. The NLP toxin family in Phytophthora sojae includes rapidly evolving groups that lack necrosis-inducing activity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25(7):896–909. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-12-0023-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bolton MD. Primary metabolism and plant defense—fuel for the fire. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22(5):487–497. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang D, Amornsiripanitch N, Dong X. A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2(11):e123. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bowling SA, et al. A mutation in Arabidopsis that leads to constitutive expression of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell. 1994;6(12):1845–1857. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.12.1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bowling SA, Clarke JD, Liu Y, Klessig DF, Dong X. The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. Plant Cell. 1997;9(9):1573–1584. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Coates ME, Beynon JL. Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis as a pathogen model. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:329–345. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-094422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baxter L, et al. Signatures of adaptation to obligate biotrophy in the Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis genome. Science. 2010;330(6010):1549–1551. doi: 10.1126/science.1195203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cabral A, et al. Identification of Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis transcript sequences expressed during infection reveals isolate-specific effectors. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fabro G, et al. Multiple candidate effectors from the oomycete pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis suppress host plant immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(11):e1002348. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anderson RG, et al. Homologous RXLR effectors from Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis and Phytophthora sojae suppress immunity in distantly related plants. Plant J. 2012;72(6):882–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Caillaud M-C, et al. A downy mildew effector attenuates salicylic acid-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis by interacting with the host mediator complex. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(12):e1001732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Badel JL, et al. In planta effector competition assays detect Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis effectors that contribute to virulence and localize to different plant subcellular compartments. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013;26(7):745–757. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0154-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Caillaud M-C, et al. Subcellular localization of the Hpa RxLR effector repertoire identifies a tonoplast-associated protein HaRxL17 that confers enhanced plant susceptibility. Plant J. 2012;69(2):252–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04787.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Böhm H, Albert I, Fan L, Reinhard A, Nürnberger T. Immune receptor complexes at the plant cell surface. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;20(9):47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shan L, et al. Bacterial effectors target the common signaling partner BAK1 to disrupt multiple MAMP receptor-signaling complexes and impede plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liebrand TW, et al. Receptor-like kinase SOBIR1/EVR interacts with receptor-like proteins in plant immunity against fungal infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(24):10010–10015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220015110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






