Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014 May 14;5(4):182–184. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2014.05.002

Pregnant women’s interest in a website or mobile application for healthy gestational weight gain

Molly E Waring a, Tiffany A Moore Simas b,c,d, Rui S Xiao a, Lisa M Lombardini a, Jeroan J Allison a, Milagros C Rosal e, Sherry L Pagoto e
PMCID: PMC4250573  NIHMSID: NIHMS599942  PMID: 25433828

Abstract

We examined pregnant women’s interest in using a website or mobile application to help them gain a healthy amount of weight during pregnancy. Pregnant women (N=64) completed a short questionnaire during routine prenatal care at hospital-based obstetric clinics in [STATE] during April-August 2012. Eighty-six percent reported interest in using a website or mobile application to help them gain a healthy amount of weight; interest ranged from 67–100% across demographics, clinical characteristics, and technology use. The Internet is a promising modality for delivering interventions to prevent excessive gestational weight gain and associated maternal and child health consequences.

Keywords: Pregnancy, weight gain, Internet, information seeking, mhealth

INTRODUCTION

Weight gain during pregnancy exceeding Institute of Medicine recommendations has been associated with short- and long-term health consequences for both mother and child, yet upwards of half of women gain more than recommended(1). The best strategy for preventing excessive gestational weight gain is unknown(2). The Internet may be an ideal delivery mechanism for pregnant women, given prevalent online information-seeking during pregnancy(3), barriers to in-person interventions during pregnancy(4), and women’s familiarity with the myriad of existing pregnancy-related mobile applications(5). The aim of this study was to examine pregnant women’s interest in using a website or mobile application to help them achieve healthy weight gain during pregnancy.

METHODS

We surveyed pregnant women at an academic medical center in [STATE] from April to August 2012. Research staff approached women during routine prenatal care after receiving permission to do so by nurses. Eligible women were pregnant and able and willing to complete a brief anonymous questionnaire in English. Women did not receive monetary or other incentive for participation. [INSTITUTION’S] Institutional Review Board approved this study.

The questionnaire was designed to take 5 minutes to complete. Women indicated their agreement with the statement “I would be interested in using a website or app to help me make healthy choices for myself and my baby and to keep my weight gain on track.” and responses were categorized as interested (“strongly agree” or “agree”) versus not interested (“neither agree nor disagree”"disagree”, or “strongly disagree”). Women were then asked to indicate their agreement with the statement “I would want a mobile version of the website that would make it easier to look at on my cell phone or mobile device.”; those who responded “agree” or “strongly agree” were considered to want a mobile version. Women reported whether they accessed the Internet during the past four weeks from the following devices: desktop, laptop, or tablet computers, from a cell phone, and/or from another Internet-enabled device. Women were asked if they had looked online during the current pregnancy for any of seven topics related to pregnancy or their unborn baby; women endorsing one or more topics were categorized as having looked online for pregnancy-related information. Demographic and pregnancy characteristics were self-reported. Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) was calculated from self-reported height and pre-pregnancy weight and was categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30.0 kg/m2), or obese (30.0 kg/m2 ≤ BMI) (1). Data were summarized using SAS (Version 9.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 82 women approached during routine prenatal care, 3 reported previously completing the survey, 9 were not interested in participating, and 6 were pressed for time or not feeling well; 64 women completed the survey, for a response rate of 81%. Characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical, and technology use characteristics of pregnant participants, and proportion interested in using a website or mobile application to help them gain a healthy amount of weight during pregnancy by these characteristics, among women receiving routine prenatal care at hospital-based obstetric clinics in [STATE], April-August 2012 (N=64)a

Total
sample,
n (%)
Interested in
Internet-delivered
gestational weight
gain intervention,
n (%)
Age
  18–24 years 19 (30) 17 (89)
  25–29 years 27 (42) 24 (89)
  30+ years 18 (28) 14 (78)
Race/ethnicity
  Non-Hispanic white 31 (48) 28 (90)
  Non-Hispanic black 8 (13) 6 (75)
  Hispanic/Latina 18 (28) 14 (78)
  Other race/ethnicity 7 (11) 7 (100)
Education
  High school/GED or less 27 (42) 23 (85)
  Trade/technical school or some college 19 (30) 16 (84)
  Bachelors degree or higher 18 (28) 16 (89)
Marital status
  Married 32 (50) 27 (84)
  Living with partner 17 (27) 14 (82)
  Single, separated, divorced, or widowed 15 (23) 14 (93)
Hard to pay for basics
  Not at all hard 36 (58) 28 (78)
  Somewhat or very hard 26 (42) 25 (96)
Pre-pregnancy weight status
  Underweight 3 (5) 3 (100)
  Normal weight 29 (48) 24 (83)
  Overweight 14 (23) 12 (86)
  Obese 14 (23) 13 (87)
First pregnancy
  No 39 (61) 32 (82)
  Yes 25 (39) 23 (92)
Trimester of pregnancy
  First trimester 9 (15) 9 (100)
  Second trimester 27 (45) 23 (85)
  Third trimester 24 (40) 22 (92)
Internet access during past four weeks
  Daily Internet access 57 (89) 50 (88)
  Less frequently than daily 4 (6) 3 (75)
  No Internet access past four weeks 3 (5) 2 (67)
Daily Internet access from smartphone and/or tablet computer
  Yes 48 (75) 42 (88)
  No 16 (25) 13 (81)
Looked online for information about pregnancy or baby during this pregnancy
  Yes 60 (94) 52 (87)
  No 4 (6) 3 (75)
a

May not sum to n=64 due to missing data in characteristics; n’s provided.

The vast majority of women surveyed (94%, n = 60) reported looking online for pregnancy information during the current pregnancy, similar to previous research(3). Pregnant women are open to and already engaged in accessing online health information. Ninety-five percent (n = 61/64) of respondents reported Internet access during the past four weeks, with 89% (n = 57) reporting daily Internet access (Table 1). Smartphones were the most commonly reported device used by pregnant women who reported Internet access; 84% of pregnant women accessed the Internet via a smartphone compared to 66% via laptop, 49% via a desktop computer, 31% via a tablet, and 23% via another device. A recent study found that of the numerous pregnancy-related apps, 40% were informative, yet the 13% of apps that were interactive were the most highly rated(5). Together, this indicates that pregnant women are seeking pregnancy-related information online, and Internet-delivered interventions for pregnancy health should be interactive.

Eight-six percent (n=55) of the sample reported interest in using a website or mobile application to help them gain a healthy amount of weight during pregnancy. Interest among groups defined by demographics, clinical characteristics, and technology use ranged from 67% to 100% (Table 1). Even among women who reported no Internet access over the past four weeks, 2 of 3 women reported interest in using a website or mobile application for pregnancy weight gain. Pregnant women face challenges to in-person behavioral interventions during pregnancy, including conflict with work schedules, lack of transportation, and a need for childcare for older children(4). An intervention delivered via a website or mobile application could overcome these challenges to participation. The findings of the current study suggest that the majority of pregnant women would find this delivery mechanism desirable.

Among those interested in a website or mobile application for gestational weight gain, 89% (n=49) indicated that they would like a mobile version to make it easier to view on their cell phone or mobile device. Our results suggest that Internet-delivered gestational weight gain interventions should be designed to be accessible via smartphones and other mobile devices in addition to via desktop or laptop computers.

This study has strengths and limitations. The survey was offered in English only, thus limiting generalizability. Additionally, our sample was recruited from obstetric clinics in a tertiary care setting and did not include women receiving prenatal care at private obstetric practices, in family medicine or community health settings, or women not receiving prenatal care. Our sample was racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse, increasing the likelihood that our findings are generalizable to obstetric populations at other academic sites across the United States. Our modest sample size limited power for statistical comparisons.

Conclusions

The vast majority of this racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of pregnant women reported regular Internet access and interest in using a website or mobile application to help them gain a healthy amount of weight during pregnancy. The Internet may be a promising modality for interventions to prevent excessive gestational weight gain and for other interventions for pregnant women.

Highlights.

  • We asked pregnant women about a website or mobile app for gestational weight gain

  • 89% accessed the Internet daily; 75% from a smartphone or tablet

  • 85% expressed interest in a website or app for healthy weight gain during pregnancy

  • 67–100% were interested across demographics, clinical factors, and technology use

  • Among those interested, 89% wanted a mobile version to access via smartphone

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Support was provided by the National Institutes of Health grants KL2TR000160 (Waring), 1U01HL105268 (Waring, Lombardini, Allison), and UL1TR000161 (Xiao). The funding sources had no involvement in the conduct of the research nor the preparation of the article.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Dr. Pagoto is on the advisory board of Empower Fitness and has a contract with Sears FitStudio.

The authors have no other conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muktabhant B, Lumbiganon P, Ngamjarus C, Dowswell T. Interventions for preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;4:CD007145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007145.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huberty J, Dinkel D, Beets MW, Coleman J. Describing the Use of the Internet for Health, Physical Activity, and Nutrition Information in Pregnant Women. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Oct 23;17(8):1363–1372. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1160-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coleman-Phox K, Laraia BA, Adler N, Vieten C, Thomas M, Epel E. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women for a behavioral intervention: lessons from the Maternal Adiposity, Metabolism, and Stress (MAMAS) Study. Prev Chron Dis. 2013;10(120096) doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tripp N, Hainey K, Liu A, Poulton A, Peek M, Kim J, et al. An emerging model of maternity care: Smartphone, midwife, doctor? Women Birth. 2014 Mar;27(1):64–67. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES