Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome of enteroscopy, using the double-balloon method, focusing on the involvement of neoplasms in strictures of the small intestine.
METHODS: Enteroscopy, using the double-balloon method, was performed between December 1999 and December 2002 at Jichi Medical School Hospital, Japan and strictures of the small intestine were found in 17 out of 62 patients. These 17 consecutive patients were subjected to analysis.
RESULTS: The double-balloon enteroscopy contributed to the diagnosis of small intestinal neoplasms found in 3 out of 17 patients by direct observation of the strictures as well as biopsy sampling. Surgical procedures were chosen for these three patients, while balloon dilation was chosen for the strictures in four patients diagnosed with inflammation without involvement of neoplasm.
CONCLUSION: Double-balloon enteroscopy is a useful method for the diagnosis and treatment of strictures in the small bowel.
Keywords: Double-balloon enteroscopy, Strictures, Small intestine
INTRODUCTION
Stricture is one of the important pathological conditions in the small intestine that may require urgent and adequate treatments. Strictures of the small bowel can be induced by various kinds of diseases. One of the most important factors for the choice of treatment of the stricture of the small bowel is to determine whether neoplasm is involved in the stricture. Indeed, endoscopic observation as well as biopsy sampling, if available before treatment, would be very helpful regarding the choice of treatment for the strictures in the small bowel.
While endoscopy provides visualization of the most proximal and distal end of gut, small bowel is among the most difficult part of the gastrointestinal tract to reach, because only a small part of the terminal ileum can be observed by intubation of the ileocecal valve after total colonoscopy. After the advent of a wireless-capsule endoscopy, this revolutionary diagnostic tool is likely to play an important role in the diagnosis of small bowel disorders[1,2]. However, the currently available Given M2A capsule endoscopy is no longer useful in patients with bowel stricture or bowel obstruction.
To overcome the limitation of the insertion depth with a conventional push method, we have developed a new method of enteroscopy using two balloons[3-5]. The double-balloon method is a new technique capable of accessing the entire small intestine with intervention capabilities. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of enteroscopy using the double-balloon method for strictures of the small intestine specifically focusing on the involvement of neoplasms in the strictures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Instruments
A new endoscopic system of the double-balloon method was prepared as described elsewhere[3-5]. In brief, a specifically designed videoendoscope (outer diameter: 8.5 mm, working length: 200 cm) with an attachable balloon at its tip and a soft overtube (length: 140 cm) with another balloon at the distal end were used. For safety and simplification of the insertion procedures, latex soft balloons were used for both the endoscope and the overtube, and a specifically designed pump was also developed, which can inflate or deflate the balloons with one-touch while accurately monitoring the balloon pressure.
Patients
Enteroscopy using the double-balloon method was performed in 62 patients between December 1999 and 2002 at Jichi Medical School Hospital, Tochigi, Japan. Full and informed consent was obtained from each patient before the procedure. Strictures of the small intestine were found in 17 patients and these consecutive 17 patients were subjected to analysis. The average age of 17 patients (9 men and 8 women) was 45.0 (23-68) years. Characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1. The procedures were performed under the fluoroscopic guidance in all cases studied. Indications of the examinations included bowel obstruction in 12 patients (71%), hematochezia in 1 patient, severe anemia in 1 patient, abdominal mass in 2 patients,and protein-losing gastroenteropathy in 1 patient.
Table 1.
Case | Indication | Age (yr) | Sex | Approach route | Endoscopic findings | Histological findings | Intervention |
1 | bowel obstruction | 48 | M | oral | narrowing anastomosis with normal mucosa1 | NA | |
2 | bowel obstruction | 40 | F | oral | edematous change of the lumen2 | non specific inflammation | dilation |
3 | low protein | 28 | F | anal | annular constriction3 | non specific inflammation | |
4 | bowel obstruction | 41 | M | oral | narrowing lumen with normal mucosa4 | NA | |
5 | abdominal tumor | 65 | M | anal | tumor | lymphoma | |
6 | bowel obstruction | 56 | M | anal | multiple strictures | non specific inflammation | |
7 | bowel obstruction | 47 | M | oral | narrowing lumen with normal mucosa4 | no remarkable change | |
8 | bowel obstruction | 29 | M | oral | mild inflammatory change5 | NA | |
9 | bowel obstruction | 50 | F | anal | tumor | inflammatory fibroid polyp | |
10 | anemia | 68 | F | anal | multiple strictures3 | non specific inflammation | |
11 | hematochezia | 41 | F | both | multiple strictures with ulceration3 | non specific inflammation | |
12 | bowel obstruction | 47 | F | oral | longitudinal ulcerations5 | NA | dilation |
13 | bowel obstruction | 62 | M | oral | narrowing anastomosis with normal mucosa1 | NA | |
14 | abdominal tumor | 52 | M | both | tumor | undifferentiated cancer | |
15 | bowel obstruction | 23 | F | anal | narrowing lumen with normal mucosa4 | NA | |
16 | bowel obstruction | 27 | F | oral | edematous change of the lumen5 | NA | dilation |
17 | bowel obstruction | 42 | M | anal | course and red-colored lumen with ulceration6 | non specific inflammation | dilation |
NA: not assessed.
Postoperative stricture was suspected.
Lung sarcoidosis was found in this patient.
Intestinal tuberculosis was suspected based on the feature of stricture or ulceration and other clinical features.
Intestinal adhesion was suspected.
Crohn's disease was suspected based on the feature of strictures or ulcerations along with other clinical features.
Posttraumatic stricture was suspected.
RESULTS
Enteroscopy was performed in 8 patients through the mouth, 7 patients through the anus, and 2 patients through both mouth and anus as shown in Table 1. The double-balloon enteroscopy was well tolerated and no complication was found in all patients studied. Neoplasms were suspected in 3 patients (18%) based on the endoscopic observation alone. Biopsies were taken in these 3 patients and neoplasm was pathologically confirmed in all 3 patients. By contrast, inflammatory disorders were suspected by the endoscopic observation in 8 patients (47%) including 3 Crohn’s diseases. Neoplasm was ruled out in these 8 patients by biopsy sampling and/or endoscopic observation. By contrast, endoscopic observation of the narrowing lumen showed normal mucosa in the remaining 5 patients (24%), suggestive of adhesion from outside or postoperative stricture. Neoplasms found in 3 patients included inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor[6], lymphoma[7], and undifferentiated cancer. Laparoscopic treatment was chosen for the first patient and open surgery for the other two patients because the diagnoses were pathologically confirmed before surgical operation. By contrast, a balloon dilation was performed after the exclusion of neoplastic diseases in 4 patients including Crohn’s diseases[8], posttraumatic stricture (Yano et al), and inflammatory stricture. Their symptoms were relieved after endoscopic dilation of the strictures in all 4 patients studied.
DISCUSSION
It is difficult to evaluate small bowel disorders because the small bowel is located quite far from the mouth and anus. Stricture is a common disorder of the small bowel. Once the presence of strictures is suspected in the small intestine, precise description and diagnosis are necessary for adequate treatment[9]. However, diagnosis is often delayed because of the difficulty in examining the small bowel. Conventional push enteroscopy is a popular method but the entire small bowel is not accessible[10-14]. The novel video capsule endoscopy system has the potential to view the entire gastrointestinal tract[15-23]. Capsule endoscopy was reported to be superior to push enteroscopy[1] and small bowel radiograph[2] for the evaluation of small bowel diseases. However, capsule endoscopy is no longer available when strictures are suspected in the gastrointestinal tract.
The new method of enteroscopy, namely double-balloon method, is a useful procedure, which enables deep insertion of an endoscope to the small intestine while preventing over-stretching of the intestinal tract. This method could be used either from mouth or anus, and allows for endoscopic observation in almost all parts of the small intestine. Moreover, to and fro observation of an affected area with controlled movement of the endoscope with an accessory channel enables interventions such as biopsies and dilatations. Thus, this new method has the potential to contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of the diseases in the small intestine where endoscopic approach has been difficult so far. It allows for viewing mucosal lesions of the small intestine, and tissue samples are also available for pathological diagnosis with biopsy through the enteroscope. Balloon dilation technique at the site of stricture is also available whenever necessary[8].
By using this new method, we were able to observe the stricture lesions of the small intestine in 17 patients. This procedure was very useful for the diagnosis of neoplasms in 3 out of 17 patients. It is important to note that biopsy samples taken from these three patients were useful for the confirmation of pathological diagnosis before surgical operations. Indeed, thanks to the pre-operative diagnosis, one patient with a benign tumor was subjected to laparotomy with minimal incision. Exact locations of the stricture lesions in these patients were marked with Indian ink beforehand by using the double-balloon enteroscope so that the lesion could be easily identified in the surgical procedure.
Balloon dilation was performed in four patients including two with Crohn’s diseases, one with posttraumatic stricture, and one with inflammatory stricture after exclusion of the involvement of neoplasm. Their symptoms were relieved after dilation of the strictures in all four patients studied.
In conclusion, enteroscopy using the double-balloon method is very useful for the diagnosis and therapeutic interventions against strictures of the small intestine.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Hironori Yamamoto has applied for the patent in Japan on the double-balloon system described in this article and presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, May 2003.
References
- 1.Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A, Jacob H, Shreiver R, Kadirkamanathan S, Lavy A, Lewkowicz S, Scapa E, Shofti R, et al. A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1431–1438. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.20844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, Foschia F, Mutignani M, Perri V, Vecchioli A, Brizi MG, Picciocchi A, Marano P. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:999–1005. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Iino S, Ido K, Sugano K. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:216–220. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.112181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamamoto H, Yano T, Kita H, Sunada K, Ido K, Sugano K. New system of double-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1556; author reply 1556–1557. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamamoto H, Sugano K. A new method of enteroscopy--the double-balloon method. Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;17:273–274. doi: 10.1155/2003/309532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miyata T, Yamamoto H, Kita H, Yano T, Sunada K, Sekine Y, Iwamoto M, Kuno A, Onishi N, Ido K, et al. A case of inflammatory fibroid polyp causing small-bowel intussusception in which retrograde double-balloon enteroscopy was useful for the preoperative diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2004;36:344–347. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hashimoto A, Yamamoto H, Yano T, Hashimoto N, Kita H, Kawakami S, Miyata T, Sunada K, Ohnishi N, Iwamoto M, et al. A case of malignant lymphoma of the small intestine with successful endoscopic hemostasis using double-balloon enteroscopy. Progress Dig Endoscopy. 2003;62:104–105. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sunada K, Yamamoto H, Kita H, Yano T, Miyata T, Sekine Y, Kuno A, Ohnishi N, Iwamoto M, Sasaki A, et al. Successful treatment with balloon dilatation in combination with double-balloon enteroscopy of a stricture in the small bowel of a patient with Crohn's disease. Digestive Endoscopy. 2004;16:237–240. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Singh RR, Brannigan AE, O'Sullivan MJ, Lane B. Defining small bowel strictures. Ir J Med Sci. 2002;171:79–80. doi: 10.1007/BF03168957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pennazio M, Arrigoni A, Risio M, Spandre M, Rossini FP. Clinical evaluation of push-type enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 1995;27:164–170. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Benz C, Jakobs R, Riemann JF. Does the insertion depth in push enteroscopy depend on the working length of the enteroscope? Endoscopy. 2002;34:543–545. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chak A, Koehler MK, Sundaram SN, Cooper GS, Canto MI, Sivak MV. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of push enteroscopy: analysis of factors associated with positive findings. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:18–22. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morris AJ, Wasson LA, MacKenzie JF. Small bowel enteroscopy in undiagnosed gastrointestinal blood loss. Gut. 1992;33:887–889. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.7.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hayat M, Axon AT, O'Mahony S. Diagnostic yield and effect on clinical outcomes of push enteroscopy in suspected small-bowel bleeding. Endoscopy. 2000;32:369–372. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature. 2000;405:417. doi: 10.1038/35013140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ginsberg GG, Barkun AN, Bosco JJ, Isenberg GA, Nguyen CC, Petersen BT, Silverman WB, Slivka A, Taitelbaum G. Wireless capsule endoscopy: August 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:621–624. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70106-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu M. M2A capsule endoscopy. A breakthrough diagnostic tool for small intestine imaging. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2002;25:24–27. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200201000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Seidman EG. Wireless capsule video-endoscopy: an odyssey beyond the end of the scope. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34:333–334. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200204000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewkowicz S, Migdal M, Gat D, Gluckhovski A, Gutmann N, Fireman Z. Initial experience of wireless-capsule endoscopy for evaluating occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small bowel pathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2776–2779. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rabenstein T, Krauss N, Hahn EG, Konturek P. Wireless capsule endoscopy -- beyond the frontiers of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:RA128–RA132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lewis BS, Swain P. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:349–353. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hahne M, Adamek HE, Schilling D, Riemann JF. Wireless capsule endoscopy in a patient with obscure occult bleeding. Endoscopy. 2002;34:588–590. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fleischer DE. Capsule endoscopy: the voyage is fantastic--will it change what we do? Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:452–456. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]