Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Dec;51(6):814–816. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21712

Bordetella holmesii Bacteremia in Sickle Cell Disease

Timothy L McCavit 1,2,*, Steve Grube 2,3, Paula Revell 2, Charles T Quinn 1,2
PMCID: PMC4251868  NIHMSID: NIHMS644630  PMID: 18680153

Abstract

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have an increased risk of invasive bacterial infection because of hyposplenism. Bordetella holmesii is a recently described Gram-negative coccobacillus with an apparent predilection for asplenic hosts. We report two patients with SCD and B. holmesii bacteremia. Fastidious growth in culture and a typically uncomplicated clinical course distinguish B. holmesii infection from other invasive bacterial infections in SCD. Providers for patients with SCD should be aware of this pathogen and ensure that their microbiology laboratories are capable of isolating and identifying this organism.

Keywords: asplenia, bacteremia, Bordetella holmesii, sickle cell disease

Introduction

Prophylactic penicillin and immunization against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b have markedly decreased the incidence of invasive bacterial infections in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) [13]. Selective pressure from antibiotic prophylaxis and immunizations may have created an environment for other organisms to emerge as pathogens. No comprehensive studies of the changing microbiology of invasive bacterial infections in SCD have been published in the past decade to address this possibility.

Bordetella holmesii is a small, fastidious Gram-negative coccobacillus that was first described in 1995 [4]. B. holmesii can cause endocarditis, community acquired pneumonia, cellulitis, suppurative arthritis, and pyelonephritis [5,6]. However, the most common clinical manifestations are fever and bacteremia in asplenic patients [5]. In 2004, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported a series of 26 patients with B. holmesii bacteremia [5]. Twenty-two (85%) of these patients were asplenic, and ten had SCD. Clinical details were not provided. Besides the 2004 CDC report, only two other manuscripts describe B. holmesii in SCD, both of which focused on the microbiology of B. holmesii [4,7]. To further characterize this new infectious complication, we report two children with SCD who had B. holmesii bacteremia within a two-month period in the spring of 2007.

Patients

Case 1

A 14-year-old female with sickle-hemoglobin C disease presented to the emergency department (ED) with a fever of 38.9°C, shaking chills, mild headache, nasal congestion, and cough (Table I). Her other vital signs and oxygen saturation were unremarkable. Physical examination revealed no obvious focus of infection. A blood culture was obtained, and she was given clindamycin IV because of a suspected ceftriaxone allergy. After brief observation, she was discharged without outpatient antibacterial therapy because she was non-toxic, her blood counts were near baseline, and follow-up was arranged.

TABLE I. Clinical Features of Cases.

Steady-state values Presenting values


Presenting symptoms Leukocytes (/mm3) Hgb (g/dl) Retics (%) Leukocyte (/mm3) Hgb (g/dl) Retics (%) Time to growth in blood culture (hr) Treatment
Case 1
 Fever, chills, cough 11,100; 71% segs; 0% bands 8.6 5.9 16,600; 80% segs; 7% bands 9.0 7.6 56, 61;N = 2 IV ceftriaxone, then oral cefixime
Case 2
 Fever, headache, back pain 9,300; 46% segs; 0% bands 10.0 1.7 7,400; 64% segs; 4% bands 10.5 5.5 60, 55;N = 2 IV ceftriaxone, then oral levofloxacin

Hgb, hemoglobin concentration; Retics, reticulocytes.

Her fever and other symptoms resolved one day after the first ED visit. After 56 hr of incubation, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were detected in her blood culture. She returned to the ED for re-evaluation; a repeat blood culture was obtained; and ceftriaxone IV was given (the suspected allergy to ceftriaxone was incorrect). She was again discharged without outpatient antibacterial therapy appearing clinically well. After 61 hr of incubation, the second blood culture grew GNB. A third blood culture was obtained, and the patient was hospitalized for ceftriaxone therapy. Upon admission, a history of a fall with a mild ankle sprain on the first day of her fever was elicited. Mild edema and warmth were now apparent in the soft tissues over her right distal tibia and the dorsum of her foot. Roentgenograms of the ankle and foot were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed soft tissue edema of the anterior ankle and foot suspicious for cellulitis, but not osteomyelitis. Four doses of daily ceftriaxone IV were completed before discharge when the physical signs of cellulitis had resolved. She received oral cefixime for three additional days at home. Her final blood culture remained sterile. She was asymptomatic at a follow-up visit 3 weeks after discharge.

Case 2

An unrelated 10-year-old female with sickle cell anemia on hydroxyurea presented to the ED for evaluation of a reported temperature of 40.2°C (Table I). The patient had frontal headaches and bilateral low back pain of 4 days' duration. Her temperature was 38.4°C, but physical examination identified no obvious focus of infection. Her peripheral smear was significant for Howell-Jolly bodies. A blood culture was obtained, 75 mg/kg of ceftriaxone was given IV, and the patient was hospitalized. The next day her fever, back pain, and headaches resolved, so she was discharged without another dose of ceftriaxone.

The blood culture obtained in the ED grew GNB at 60 hr of incubation. She was then re-hospitalized for treatment of bacteremia with ceftriaxone. She was afebrile, and again, no obvious focus of infection was identified. A repeat blood culture obtained at the time of re-admission grew GNB at 55 hr of incubation. She remained asymptomatic and was discharged after 36 hr to complete empiric antibacterial treatment with oral levofloxacin. A final blood culture obtained 1 week after discharge was negative.

Identification of the Organism

The blood cultures were incubated in the BacT/Alert 3D continuously monitored blood culture system (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France). Gram-stained smears of the positive cultures showed small GNB. Growth on subculture was slow, requiring 48 hr of incubation to visualize small colonies on blood and chocolate agar. At 72 hr a zone of browning was observed around the colonies. The organisms had no oxidase or catalase activity. Commercially available identification systems, including the Dade Microscan Walk away Gram negative ID card, the Remel rapid ID NH, and the API NE, failed to identify the organism. Therefore, the 16s rRNA gene (1283 nucleotides) was sequenced, and the results showed 100% nucleic acid sequence identity to published B. holmesii 16s rRNA gene sequences (GenBank accession numbers: DQ409136.1, AF469002.1, AJ239044.1) [6,8,9].

Discussion

Hyposplenic patients are at increased risk for infection with the emerging pathogen, B. holmesii. It has been reported from geographically distinct areas of the world, but in only 10 patients with SCD [4,5,7]. We report two new patients with SCD and B. holmesii bacteremia. Both had fever and non-specific constitutional symptoms without marked leukocytosis, a left shift, or hyper-hemolysis. One patient had suspected cellulitis; the other had no apparent focus of infection. Neither patient had an indwelling catheter. We identified no epidemiologic link between these patients except that both had SCD, which is associated with hyposplenism. No formal testing of splenic function was performed in either patient. However, case 2 clearly had hyposplenism despite the hydroxyurea therapy, given the Howell-Jolly bodies on her peripheral blood film. Case 1 had Pappenheimer bodies, which are also normally removed by the spleen.

The unusual microbiology of B. holmesii distinguishes it from other bacterial pathogens in SCD. Consistently prolonged time to detection (50–60 hr of incubation) in standard culture systems is uncommon for bacterial pathogens in patients with SCD [10] and in the general population [11]. The uncomplicated clinical course of B. holmesii bacteremia [5] distinguishes it from other Gram-negative organisms, like Salmonella and E. coli, which can cause significant morbidity or mortality. The optimal treatment for B. holmesii bacteremia has not been established because so few infections have been reported. The average minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates from the CDC was high for the penicillins, cephalosporins, and macrolides, which might preclude their clinical use. The MICs of the fluoroquinolones and the carbapenems were lower, so they could be considered for serious infections [5]. Only 80% of the patients in the CDC report received antimicrobials of any kind [5], so it is possible that B. holmesii bacteremia is self-limited in some patients. Our patients may have recovered despite antibacterial therapy.

B. holmesii is a newly identified bacterial pathogen in patients with SCD. The relatively benign clinical course and unusual bacteriology of B. holmesii distinguish it from other bacterial pathogens in SCD. Proper identification of this organism might permit a limited course of parenteral antibacterial therapy and prevent prolonged hospitalizations for patients with B. holmesii bacteremia. Therefore, physicians who manage patients with SCD need to be aware of this bacterium and ensure that their microbiology laboratories can properly identify it.

Footnotes

Disclosure of conflicts of interest: We have no relevant conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Halasa NB, Shankar SM, Talbot TR, et al. Incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease among individuals with sickle cell disease before and after the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:1428–1433. doi: 10.1086/516781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gaston MH, Verter JI, Woods G, et al. Prophylaxis with oral penecillin in children with sickle cell anemia. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1593–1599. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606193142501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ammann AJ, Addiego J, Wara DW, et al. Polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide immunization of patients with sickle cell anemia and patients with splenectomy. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:897–900. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197710272971701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weyant RS, Hollis DG, Weaver RE, et al. Bordetella holmesii sp. nov., a New Gram-Negative Species Associated with Septicemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1–7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.1-7.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shepard CW, Daneshvar MI, Kaiser RM, et al. Bordetella holmesii bacteremia: A newly recognized clinical entity among asplenic patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:799–804. doi: 10.1086/381888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tang YW, Hopkins MK, Kolbert CP, et al. Bordetella holmesii-like organism associated with septicemia, endocarditis, and respiratory failure. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:389–392. doi: 10.1086/516323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Njamkepo E, Delisle F, Hagege I, et al. Bordetella holmesii isolated from a patient with sickle cell anemia: Analysis and comparison with other Bordetella holmesii isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000;3:131–136. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Russell FM, Davis JM, Whipp MJ, et al. Severe Bordetella holmesii infection in a previously healthy adolescent confirmed by gene sequence analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:129–130. doi: 10.1086/320892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dorbecker C, Licht C, Korber F, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia due to Bordetella holmesii in a patient with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. J Infect. 2007;54:e203–e205. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Norris CFSWK, McGowan KL. Positive blood cultures in sickle cell disease: Time to positivity and clinical outcome. J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol. 2003;25:390–395. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200305000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hardy DJ, Hulbert BB, Migneault PC. Time to detection of positive BacT/alert blood cultures and lack of need for routine subculture of 5- to 7-day negative cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2743–2745. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2743-2745.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES