Abstract
We have investigated the effects of light-emitting diode (LED)-induced phototoxicity (LIP) on cone-photoreceptors and their protection with brimonidine (BMD), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). In anesthetized, dark adapted, adult albino rats a blue (400 nm) LED was placed perpendicular to the cornea (10 sec, 200 lux) and the effects were investigated using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and/or analysing the retina in oriented cross-sections or wholemounts immune-labelled for L- and S-opsin and counterstained with the nuclear stain DAPI. The effects of topical BMD (1%) or, intravitreally injected BDNF (5 µg), PEDF (2 µg), CNTF (0.4 µg) or bFGF (1 µg) after LIP were examined on wholemounts at 7 days. SD-OCT showed damage in a circular region of the superotemporal retina, whose diameter varied from 1,842.4±84.5 µm (at 24 hours) to 1,407.7±52.8 µm (at 7 days). This region had a progressive thickness diminution from 183.4±5 µm (at 12 h) to 114.6±6 µm (at 7 d). Oriented cross-sections showed within the light-damaged region of the retina massive loss of rods and cone-photoreceptors. Wholemounts documented a circular region containing lower numbers of L- and S-cones. Within a circular area (1 mm or 1.3 mm radius, respectively) in the left and in its corresponding region of the contralateral-fellow-retina, total L- or S-cones were 7,118±842 or 661±125 for the LED exposed retinas (n = 7) and 14,040±1,860 or 2,255±193 for the fellow retinas (n = 7), respectively. BMD, BDNF, PEDF and bFGF but not CNTF showed significant neuroprotective effects on L- or S-cones. We conclude that LIP results in rod and cone-photoreceptor loss, and is a reliable, quantifiable model to study cone-photoreceptor degeneration. Intravitreal BDNF, PEDF or bFGF, or topical BMD afford significant cone neuroprotection in this model.
Introduction
In mammals nigthtlight (scotopic) vision is carried out by rod-photoreceptors, while cone-photoreceptors are responsible for daylight (photopic) vision and colour discrimination. In nonprimate mammals, photopic vision is achieved by two types of cones, each carrying an opsin responsible for detection of short (S-cones) and medium to long (L-cones) wave lengths, respectively. S-cones express the ultraviolet sensitive or SWS1 opsin and L-cones express the LWS opsin which detects green light and is referred as the L-opsin. These opsins, expressed in the outer segment, may be identified with immunohistochemistry and used as reliable markers to identify rodent cone-photoreceptors [1]–[3]. The albino rat retina, as in most mammals, is an L-cone-dominated retina with an L-to-S-cone mean ratio of 6∶1 [1]. Although the rat retina does not have a proper macula, it has a visual streak with highest concentrations of RGCs and L-cones, but mostly devoid of S-cones, in an horizontal region along the dorsal retina [1],[2],[4]–[6].
Retinal exposure to either excessive or short-wavelength light may result in damage to photoreceptors [7] or to their functional counterpart [8], the retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE) [9]. Both types of cells contain light-absorbing pigments, the photoreceptors contain the opsins responsible for phototransduction while RPE contain pigments (e.g., melanin and lipofuscin) that absorb scattered light to improve optical quality [8]. Photochemical damage [10], [11] may involve the formation of free radicals and thus oxidative stress following excessive photoreceptor photopigment activation [7] or the effect of short-wavelength linked to chemical changes in lipofuscin [9]. Light-induced retinal damage has been used as a model for animal and human photoreceptor degenerations [12]–[14], including inherited animal models of retinal degeneration and atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [15]. Indeed, excessive light is a known risk factor for AMD [16], [17], the most common cause of vision loss in human over the age of 65 [18], and in the pathogenesis of this disease it has been postulated that photochemical damage might be mediated by oxidative stress [19].
Numerous studies have reported the effects of light-induced phototoxicity on photoreceptors, both in rats and mice, as well as the effects of several neuroprotective agents [11], [20]. Indeed, several studies have reported the neuroprotective effects of alpha-2 selective agonist [21] as wells as of trophic factors including BDNF, CNTF, PEDF and bFGF [22]–[35], against light-induced photoreceptor cell loss. Most of the above mentioned studies however, have reported the response of photoreceptors as a whole without making distinctions between different types of photoreceptors and to date, there is little to none information regarding the specific response of L- or S-cone-photoreceptors and their possible rescue in in vivo murine models of phototoxicity.
The rat retina provides an excellent model to study short and long-term neuronal responses against a variety of injuries or diseases, including phototoxic-induced [12]–[14], [36] or inherited models [37]–[43] of photoreceptor degeneration. In our laboratory, we have recently developed automated routines to identify, count and map the topography of the entire population of adult rodent retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) both in control [4]–[6], [44]–[46] or injured retinas [13], [14], [41], [47]–[56], as well as of S- and L-cones, both in control [1], [2] or injured retinas [3]. Optic coherence tomography (OCT) is a technique used in ophthalmology for more than 20 years to study the retina in vivo. More recently, Spectral Domain (SD) OCT resolution has been introduced in clinics and also in animal studies [57]–[63].
The aim of this study is to characterize an in vivo model of focal retinal phototoxicity-induced cone-photoreceptor degeneration in adult albino rats that would allow for longitudinal in vivo and ex vivo assessment. Thus, one primer objective is to establish quantitatively the pattern of cone photoreceptor cell loss that follows light-induced phototoxicity of the retina. Rather than simply sampling areas of the retina, as has been the rule to obtain quantitative and qualitative data for previous retinal light-induced damage studies, the state of the art technologies employed in the present manuscript (i.e. automatic quantification of whole L- and S-cone population in retinal wholemounts and detailed topological representation of injured/remaining cone-photoreceptors within the retina in color-coded isodensity maps) allows specific investigation of the entire populations of L- and S-cones. This becomes even more relevant if one takes into account that, on average, approximately 99% of the photoreceptors in the rat are rods while cones account for only 1% [64], [65]. Thus, the response of rat cone-photoreceptors to this type of lesion, even though probably linked to the fate of rods, has been rarely studied specifically. Moreover, we succeed in directing the damage specifically to the retinal region that contains the peak L-cone and retinal ganglion cell densities, and thus may be used to study cone-photoreceptor injury. A second important objective is to explore the neuroprotective effects of BMD (topically applied) or BDNF, bFGF, PEDF or CNTF (injected intravitreally), on cone survival after phototoxicity.
Here we present a new reproducible and quantifiable model of focal cone degeneration induced in the temporal tip of the rat visual streak by blue-Light Emitting Diode (LED) photoexposition. Moreover, we document neuroprotection with several neurotrophic factors and topical BMD. It is anticipated that these data could serve as a baseline for further studies aimed at investigating cone-photoreceptor neuroprotection. Short accounts were reported [66], [67].
Material and Methods
Animal handling
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) and the European Union guidelines for the use of animals in research, and all used protocols were approved by the Ethical and Animal Studies Committee of the University of Murcia. Adult female albino Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (180–230 g) obtained from Charles River Laboratories (L'Arbresle, France) were housed at the University of Murcia animal facilities, in temperature and light controlled rooms (12 h light/dark cycle) with food and water “ad libitum”. Light intensity within the cages ranged from 5 to 30 lux. Surgeries and animal manipulations were performed under general anaesthesia [intraperitoneal (ip) injection of xylazine (10 mg/kg body weight (bw), Rompun; Bayer, Kiel, Germany) and ketamine (60 mg/kg bw, Imalgene; Merial Laboratorios, Barcelona, Spain)], and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Oral analgesia was provided from the day of experimental manipulation to the day of sacrifice (Buprex, Bupernorphine 0.3 mg/mL, Shering-Plough, Madrid, Spain, was prepared in gelatin strawberry-flavoured at 0.5 mg/kg). During recovery topical ointment containin Tobramycin (Tobrex Alcon-Cusí, S.A., El Masnou, Barcelona, Spain) was applied to prevent corneal dessication. Animals were sacrificed with an ip overdose of pentobarbital (Dolethal, Vetoquinol, Especialidades Veterinarias, S.A., Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain). In all rats the left eyes were used as experimental and the contralateral fellow-right eyes served as controls.
Experimental design and Animal groups
The study addressed the following questions regarding blue-light emitting diode (LED)-induced phototoxicity (LIP): 1) Does LIP result in reproducible focal loss of L- and S-cones and, can the lesion be targeted to a specific retinal location? 2) Is the loss of cones permanent or does it progress with time? And, 3) Can retinal damage be prevented with retinal neuroprotective substances? ( Fig. 1 ).
Light emitting diode induced-phototoxicity
Animals were dark adapted overnight (at least 12 h; [68]) and subsequent manipulations were conducted under dim red light (λ>600 nm). One hour prior to LIP, rats were anaesthetized and pupil mydriasis was induced in the left eye with one drop of tropicamide (Tropicamida 1%; Alcon-Cusí, S.A., El Masnou, Barcelona, Spain). LIP was performed in the left eye between 10–12 am to avoid variations in the amount of retinal toxicity related to the time of light exposure [11], [68],[69]. The rat's head was placed horizontal on a head-holder and the left eye was exposed to blue-light (400 nm) by a light emitting diode (LED) (emission spectrum 390–410; catalogue number 454–4405; Kingbright Elec. Co., Taipei, Taiwan) connected to a computer to control for duration of exposure (10 secs) and intensity of light (200 lux; lux intensity was measured with a luxometer (light meter TES-1330; TES Electrical Electronic Corp., Taipei, Taiwan) placed 1 mm below and perpendicular to the LED). The LED was held by a micromanipulator and placed 1 mm above and perpendicular to the corneal apex of the left eye. Tsukahara and colleagues [70] have estimated the transmittance of the ocular media (cornea and crystalline lens) at different wavelengths in rats, and found that for blue-light (400 nm) the energy that reaches the retina is ≈78%. Thus we assume that under our experimental conditions approximately 80% of the energy provided by the LED reaches the retina.
Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)
In naïve (n = 2) or light exposed (n = 7) anaesthetized rats, the left pupil was dilated and a custom-made contact lens was placed on the cornea. Retinal OCT was carried out with a SD-OCT device (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To adapt for the optical qualities of the rat eye, a commercially available 78-D double aspheric fundus lens (Volk Optical, Inc., Mentor, OH) was mounted directly in front of the camera unit. Imaging was performed with a proprietary software package (Eye Explorer, version 3.2.1.0; Heidelberg Engineering). Length of the reference pathway was adjusted manually according to manufacturer's instructions. To analyse the progression of the damage caused by the LIP, the experimental eyes were examined (scan angle 55°) 12 h, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after LIP. At the same times of study, using scan OCT sections formed by 6 diagonal in star shape with its centre located in the centre of the lesion (scan angle 30°), we measured the length of the lesion and the retinal thickness in the centre of the lesion. These animals were sacrificed 7 days after LIP and their retinas prepared as wholemounts and processed for immunohistochemistry (see below).
Neuroprotective compounds (Doses, frequency and routes)
Two different routes of administration and five different neuroprotective compounds were tested in this work. An alpha-2-adrenergic agonist, 1% BMD in 0.9%NaCl (Allergan Inc. Irvine, CA, USA) was administered topically (two 5 µl drops three times a day) starting the day before LIP (pre-LIP group; n = 7) or immediately after (post-LIP group; n = 7). Right after LIP, 5 µl were injected intravitreally [71], [72] containing 5 µg of BDNF (Preprotech, London, UK) (n = 7), 2 µg PEDF (Preprotech, London, UK) (n = 7) or 0.4 µg of CNTF (R&D Systems; Vitro S.A. Madrid, Spain) (n = 8), all diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), or 1 µg of bFGF (Preprotech, London, UK) (n = 8) diluted in Tris-Cl 2 mM pH 7.6. Additional groups of control rats were treated with corresponding vehicle solutions.
Tissue processing
After deep anaesthesia, the superior pole of the eye was marked with a silk 6/0 suture to maintain proper orientation [1], [3]–[5], [73], then rats were perfused through the heart with saline and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PB, both eyes enucleated and further processed to obtain wholemounts or cross-sections, and the L- and S-cones were immunodetected by their specific opsin expression as described in detail [1]. In brief, retinal wholemounts or cross-sections were incubated in 1∶1000 goat anti-OPN1SW (N-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany. Lot# L1906, sc-14363) and in 1∶1200 rabbit anti-opsin red/green (Chemicon-Milipore Iberica, Madrid, Spain. Lot # 2210352, AB 5405) and these were visualized with secondaries 1∶500 Alexa Fluor-488 donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L) (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Barcelona, Spain. Lot # 1182671, A11055), or 1∶500 Alexa Fluor-594 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Barcelona, Spain. Lot # 1107500, A21207), respectively. All antibodies were diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain).
Retinal Analysis
We analysed a group of retinas 7 d after LIP in radial-sections to determine whether the lack of opsin-immunoreactivity reflected opsin downregulation or cone-photoreceptor loss, and to investigate if LIP in these retinas had also affected rods. Oriented 14 µm thick cross-sections cut in the parasagittal plane were obtained in a freezing microtome, doubly immunoreacted for L- and S-opsin and also stained for DAPI [1]. Retinal wholemounts or cross-sections (left and right eyes) were examined for L-opsin (detected with Alexa Fluor-568, red signal) and S-opsin (detected with Alexa Fluor-488, green signal) and photographed with a microscope (Axioscop 2 Plus; Zeiss) equipped with a digital-high-resolution camera (ProgResTM c10; Jenoptic, Jena, Germany) and a computer-driven motorized stage (ProScanTM H128; Prior Scientific Instruments Ltd., Cambridge, UK) connected to an image analysis system (Image-Pro Plus 5.1 for Windows; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) and a microscope controller module (Scope-Pro 5.0 for Windows; Media Cybernetics). Photomontages of wholemounts or cross-sections were constructed from 154 consecutive frames captured on the microscope side by side with no gap or overlap between them. All images were captured at a resolution of 300 dpi. Reconstructed images were further processed with image-editing computer software (Adobe Photoshop CS; ver. 8.0.1; Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA), when correct orientation of the retina or image coupling was needed. The area of retinal wholemounts was measured on the high-resolution photomontage image of the complete retina, with the software (IPP; Media Cybernetics). The light exposed retinas showed a small region of an approximate circular shape with diminished numbers of L- and S-cones with its centre consistently located at approximately 3,4 mm from the optic disc in the superotemporal quadrant. This region was delineated and measured (IPP; Media Cybernetics).
Counts of L- or S-cones in two predetermined fixed-size circular areas (PCA) and isodensity maps
Total numbers of remaining L- and S-cones were counted automatically on retinal wholemounts using recently developed routines that count labelled cone outer-segments [1]–[3], [42], and the data were translated into isodensity maps (Sigmaplot 9.0, Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA) as reported [1]–[3] to allow the visualization of detailed topological distribution. The light exposed retinas showed a damaged region of circular shape, with diminished densities of L- and S-cones and an almost absence of these in its centre. Thus, an additional macro was designed to count remaining L- or S-opsin immunoreactive cones within predetermined fixed-size circular areas (PCA) of the retina that comprised the light-damaged region, which was larger for S- than for L-cones, and thus PCA were larger for S- (radius of 1.3 mm) than for L- (radius of 1 mm) cones ( Fig. 2 ). For each experimental animal, these counts were obtained from the left retina and from a corresponding region in their right-fellow retina ( Fig. 2 ). An additional macro enabled representation of the number of L- or S-opsin immunoreactive cone outer-segments within these PCA in both retinas.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis were performed with SigmaStat for Windows version 3.11 (Systat Sofware, Inc., Richmond, CA), differences were considered significant when p<0.05 and tests are detailed in Tables.
Results
Optimization of LED induced phototoxicity parameters
To develop this in vivo model, we had previously analysed numerous different combinations of light intensities and exposure times to produce a small but well demarcated region of retinal damage. Light intensities (100-500 lux) and time-exposures (5 sec-5 minutes) were explored, and these produced small focal lesions of increasing size with increasing intensities, time-exposures or both. In additional experiments, the location of the LED with respect to the main eye axis was modified with a micromanipulator to target the injury to the highest L-cone-density area of the retina located in the superotemporal quadrant. Consistent results were obtained with intensities of 200 lux and time exposure intervals of 10 sec, and thus, these parameters were used thereafter.
In vivo and ex vivo analysis of LIP-retinal damage
In vivo SD-OCT analysis
LIP was analysed in vivo and in a group of control-naïve (n = 2) and experimental (n = 7) rats ( Figs. 3 – 4 ). The left retinas were imaged in vivo using SD-OCT at 12 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after LIP. Retinal damage was circumscribed to a circular region of approximately 1.8 mm diameter. Fundus eyes images ( Fig. 3 ) and OCT scans ( Fig. 4 ) show the progression of retinal damage at increasing survival-intervals after LIP ( Figs. 3 – 4 ). There was a progressive diminution of the retinal thickness in the centre of damage from 12 hours (183.4±5 µm) to 7 days (114.6±6 µm). Quantitative analysis indicates that the thinning was mainly due to thickness diminution of the outer nuclear (ONL) and outer segment layers (OSL) of the retina ( Fig. 4 ). The maximal diameter of the damaged region decreased from 24 hours (1,842.4±84.5 µm) to 7 days (1,407.7±52.8 µm) after LIP ( Fig. 4 ). In naïve rats, the mean retinal thickness was 192.7±5 µm.
Ex vivo Immunocytochemical analysis
Following last OCT analysis the retinas were processed for fluorescence microscopy. The right-fellow retinas showed highest concentrations of L-cones, and lowest of S-cones, in a horizontal region along the superior naso-temporal axis, approximately 1 mm above the optic disc with maximum values in the superotemporal quadrant, and this is consistent with the normal parameters described for the albino rat retina [1] ( Fig. 5 ). In contrast, the light-exposed retinas showed a small circular region with diminished L- and S-opsin immunofluorescence, consistently positioned in the superotemporal quadrant with their centre located at approximately 3.4 mm from the optic disc. When measured, the regions lacking L-opsin immunoreactivity had a mean (±SD) value of 0.68±0.17 mm2 (n = 7) with a range between 0.51 and 0.94 mm2, whereas for the S-cones the damaged region, which was also of circular shape whit its centre in the same location as for the L-cones, the area was significantly larger with a mean value of 3.57±0.38 mm2 (n = 7) and a range between 2.99 and 4.03 mm2 ( Table 1, Fig. 5 ). There were no significant differences in the mean total area of the experimental retinas when compared to their fellow- or to naïve-retinas ( Table 2 ).
Table 1. Quantitative analysis of LIP retinal damage.
Total number of cones in retinal wholemounts | Cones in predetermined fixed-size circular areas (PCA) | Area of retina | Area of damaged) | Diameter length of damage (µm) | ||||||||||||
Rat | L-cones | S-cones | L-cones | S-cones | (mm2) | region (mm2 | Measured on retinal wholemounts | Measured | ||||||||
Right retina | Left retina | Right retina | Left retina | Right retina | Left retina | Right retina | Left retina | Right retina | Left retina | L-cones | S-cones | L-cones | S-cones | average | by OCT | |
C | 215,894 | 200,429 | 34,892 | 35,707 | 14,521 | 7,025 | 2,556 | 625 | 58.2 | 55.0 | 0.57 | 2.99 | 952 | 1,882 | 1,417 | 1,390 |
D | 219,235 | 223,050 | 41,258 | 35,057 | 17,001 | 7,753 | 1,998 | 496 | 58.3 | 57.6 | 0.76 | 3.92 | 892 | 2,105 | 1,499 | 1,443 |
E | 206,983 | 215,943 | 37,489 | 28,757 | 13,986 | 6,136 | 2,204 | 729 | 56.2 | 57.2 | 0.86 | 3.69 | 986 | 2,039 | 1,513 | 1,404 |
F | 236,874 | 193,050 | 30,980 | 36,994 | 11,587 | 5,897 | 2,369 | 642 | 56.6 | 58.6 | 0.94 | 3.18 | 1,107 | 1,701 | 1,404 | 1,319 |
G | 238,025 | 210,199 | 39,568 | 29,876 | 14,789 | 7,249 | 2,179 | 894 | 58.0 | 59.2 | 0.60 | 3.71 | 774 | 2,114 | 1,444 | 1,373 |
H | 228,654 | 250,188 | 41,274 | 34,340 | 14,568 | 7,568 | 2,089 | 655 | 53.5 | 54.6 | 0.51 | 4.03 | 774 | 2,381 | 1,578 | 1,467 |
I | 211,089 | 208,956 | 40,153 | 36,029 | 11,827 | 8,196 | 2,391 | 584 | 57.6 | 55.4 | 0.53 | 3.46 | 773 | 2,270 | 1,521 | 1,458 |
mean | 222,393 * | 214,545 * | 37,945 † | 33,823 † | 14,040 ‡ | 7,118 ‡ | 2,255 § | 661 § | 56.9 # | 56.8 # | 0.68 | 3.57 | 894 | 2,070 | 1,482 | 1,408 |
SD | 12,320 | 18,512 | 3,821 | 3,202 | 1,860 | 842 | 193 | 125 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 130 | 228 | 63 | 53 |
Total numbers of cones automatically quantified in retinal wholemounts from experimental rats whose left eye had been exposed to Light Emitting Diode-induced phototoxicity (LIP) and were analysed seven days later. The numbers of cones within predetermined fixed-size circular areas (PCA) were also automatically quantified. The total areas of the retinas (Area of retina) as well as the areas lacking L- or S-cones (Area of damaged region) were measured over flat-mounted retinas. The maximum diameters (Diameter length of damage) of the areas lacking L- or S-cones were measured over flat-mounted retinas and also the length of ONL lacking cell nuclei was measured in vivo with OCT. Statistical analysis: *T-test p = 0.369; †T-test p = 0.049; ‡T-test p≤0.001; §T-test p≤0.001; # When compared with the areas of naïve retinas (see Table 2) there were no significant differences (ANOVA p = 0.974).
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of naive retinas.
Rat | Total number of cones in retinal wholemounts | Area of | Density in the whole retina (cones/mm2) | ||
L-cones | S-cones | retina (mm2) | L-cones | S-cones | |
A | 236,789 | 38,579 | 58.3 | 4064 | 662 |
A' | 225,986 | 39,850 | 58.0 | 3896 | 687 |
B | 228,564 | 40,297 | 56.8 | 4021 | 709 |
B' | 216,661 | 37,958 | 55.0 | 3940 | 690 |
mean | 227,000 | 39,171 | 57.0 # | 3980 | 687 |
SD | 8,290 | 1,088 | 1.5 | 76 | 19 |
Total numbers of cones automatically quantified in retinal wholemounts from naïve rats. The total areas of the retinas (Area of retina) were measured over flat-mounted retinas. The densities of L- and S-cones are provided. # When compared with the areas of the retinas from experimental animals (see Table 1) there were no significant differences (ANOVA p = 0.974).
Total numbers of L- or S-cones in naïve (n = 4) and fellow-right (n = 7) retinas of light exposed rats were 227,000±8,290 or 39,171±1,088 and 222,393±12,320 or 37,945±3,821, respectively, and these are comparable to previously reported data [1]. The total numbers of L- or S-cones in the light-exposed retinas were slightly or significantly smaller, respectively, than in their right retinas ( Tables 1 , 3 , Fig. 6 ). Thus, in addition to focal loss, there was also diffuse loss of cones and this was more apparent for the S-cones as observed in the isodensity maps ( Fig. 6 ).
Table 3. Densities of L- and S-cones in LIP damage retinas.
Density in the whole retina (cones/mm2) | Ratio between damaged and | |||||
Animals | total retinal area (%) | |||||
L-cones | S-cones | L-cones | S-cones | |||
Right retina | Left retina | Right retina | Left retina | |||
C | 3712 | 3642 | 600 | 649 | 1.04 | 5.44 |
D | 3763 | 3869 | 708 | 608 | 1.31 | 6.80 |
E | 3683 | 3778 | 667 | 503 | 1.51 | 6.45 |
F | 4188 | 3292 | 548 | 631 | 1.60 | 5.42 |
G | 4104 | 3551 | 682 | 505 | 1.02 | 6.27 |
H | 4277 | 4583 | 772 | 629 | 0.94 | 7.38 |
I | 3663 | 3773 | 697 | 650 | 0.96 | 6.25 |
mean | 3913 β | 3784 β | 668 Φ | 596 Φ | 1.20 | 6.28 |
SD | 265 | 400 | 74 | 65 | 0.28 | 0.70 |
Densities of L-and S-cones in retinas from experimental rats seven days after Light Emitting Diode-induced phototoxicity (LIP) in the left eyes, as well as the ratio between damaged and total retinal area. Statistical analysis, T-test: β p = 0.491; Φ p = 0.039.
Total numbers of L or S cones in the predetermined fixed-size circular areas (PCA) analysed were 7,118±842 or 661±125 in the LED exposed retinas (n = 7) and 14,040±1,860 or 2,255±193 in the contralateral retinas (n = 7), respectively ( Table 1, Fig. 7 ). Thus LIP results within the PCA measured, in the loss of approximately 49% or 71% of the L- or S-cone population, respectively.
The loss of cones appears permanent and does not progress with time
Oriented Cross-sections analysis
Retinal cross-sections from fellow-right eyes had a normal appearance [1] as did also cross-sections from light-exposed retinas. However, upon closer inspection of the latter, a small region of damage could be found in the superotemporal retina. Within this region it was difficult to identify cell DAPI stained nuclei within the outer nuclear layer, although some residual L- or S-immunoreactivity was present in the outer segment layer of the retina. The damage, which extended for approximately 1,500 µms, had an abrupt start on both, superior and inferior limits, with an almost complete lack of cell nuclei ( Fig. 8 ). These results document that within the light-damaged region of the retina there is massive loss of both rods and cone-photoreceptors.
Wholemounts analysed 7 or 30 days after LIP do not show progression of damage
To explore if the total number of missing cones or if the area of damage increased with longer survival intervals, we have compared two groups of rats examined 7 or 30 days after LIP. As described above, LIP resulted in a small circular region of damage consistently situated in the superotemporal quadrant, which was larger for S- than for the L-cones ( Fig. 9 ). Total number of L- or S-cones, counted automatically within PCA of the left experimental retinas, were 7,383±1,047 (n = 8) or 580±211 (n = 8) and 7,711±1,245 (n = 8) or 627±71 (n = 8), at 7 and 30 days, respectively ( Table 4 ), and these were comparable. The areas lacking L- or S-opsin immunoreactivity at 7 and 30 days were also comparable ( Table 4 ). Thus, altogether these results suggest that neither the region with focal lesion nor the number of lost cones progress further between 7 and 30 days after LIP.
Table 4. Comparative analysis of retinal damage 7 and 30 days after LIP.
7 days after LIP | ||||||
Animal | L-cones | S-cones | ||||
Right Retina | Left Retina | Damaged area (mm2) | Right Retina | Left Retina | Damaged area (mm2) | |
A | 15,670 | 6,925 | 0.76 | 2,653 | 753 | 3.01 |
B | 15,891 | 8,698 | 0.71 | 2,068 | 426 | 4.03 |
C | 14,529 | 7,691 | 0.76 | 2,289 | 458 | 3.73 |
D | 12,509 | 7,463 | 0.58 | 2,053 | 448 | 3.06 |
E | 11,136 | 6,681 | 0.88 | 2,144 | 293 | 2.87 |
F | 12,967 | 9,024 | 0.61 | 2,295 | 939 | 4.03 |
G | 12,787 | 6,098 | 0.62 | 1,973 | 649 | 3.46 |
H | 15,330 | 6,489 | 0.86 | 2,280 | 678 | 2.87 |
mean | 13,852 | 7,384 * | 0.72 † | 2,219 | 580 ‡ | 3.38 § |
SD | 1,740 | 1,047 | 0.11 | 214 | 211 | 0.50 |
Comparative analysis of retinal damage at 7 or 30 days after Light Emitting Diode-induced phototoxicity (LIP). The number of L- or S-cones quantified in the predetermined fixed-size circular areas PCA, as well as the area lacking L- or S-cones (Damaged area) measured over flat-mounted retinas reveals that neither the area of the focal lesion nor the number of lost cones progress further between 7 and 30 days after LIP. Statistical analysis, T-test: * p = 0.579; † p = 0.253; ‡ p = 0.562; § p = 0.973.
Topical brimonidine and Intravitreal BDNF, bFGF or PEDF prevent cone photoreceptor loss
The effects of topical BMD (1%) administered before or right after LIP, and the effects of BDNF (5 µg), PEDF (2 µg), CNTF (0.4 µg) or bFGF (1 µg) intravitreally injected after LIP were examined in wholemounts at 7 d. Total numbers of L or S cones counted automatically within PCA in experimental as well as in corresponding regions of their fellow retinas are detailed in Table 5 , and a representative example from each group is shown in Figure 10 . These results demonstrate that although intravitreal injection of CNTF (0.4 µg) does not provide significant neuroprotection, BDNF (5 µg), PEDF (2 µg) or bFGF (1 µg) are effective neuroprotectors against focal phototoxicity-induced cone degeneration, as it is also topically administered BMD (1%) (both pre- or post-LIP) ( Fig. 11 , Table 5 ).
Table 5. Neuroprotective effects of topical BMD or intravitreal BDNF, PEDF, CNTF or bFGF.
L-cones | S-cones | ||||
Right retina | Left retina | Right retina | Left retina | ||
Vehicle Saline pre n = 7 | 12,509±1,111 | 7,463±1,256 * | 2,425±538 | 812±299 † | |
Topical administration | Brimonidine pre n = 7 | 11,136±1,303 | 9,024±1,405 * | 2,268±406 | 1,578±361 † |
Vehicle Saline post n = 8 | 13,273±1,640 | 7,775±1,038 ‡ | 2,195±347 | 689±238 § | |
Brimonidine post n = 7 | 11,292±1,486 | 9,007±1,453 ‡ | 2,308±628 | 1,444±629 § | |
Vehicle PBS n = 9 | 12,951±2,733 | 6,716±2,526 π¥ω | 2,361±520 | 662±235 #Φδ | |
BDNF n = 7 | 12,787±2,938 | 9,710±3,725 π | 2,051±728 | 1,229±509 # | |
PEDF n = 7 | 12,551±1,797 | 9,463±1,241 ¥ | 2,500±469 | 1,685±390 Φ | |
Intravitreal administration | CNTF n = 8 | 13,129±2,671 | 5,522±3,037 ω | 2,386±288 | 709±204 δ |
Vehicle TRIS n = 8 | 13,532±1,743 | 6,617±3,614 ж | 2,442±483 | 762±257 ю | |
bFGF n = 8 | 13,438±2,175 | 10,662±1,830 ж | 2,544±351 | 1,414±398 ю |
Comparative analysis between groups treated with neuroprotective agents or corresponding vehicles indicates that there was a significant greater number of cones in each treatment with respect to the vehicle treated group except for the CNTF treated group. Statistical analysis, T-test: * p = 0.047; † p≤0.001; ‡ p = 0.049; § p≤0.001; π p = 0.035; # p = 0.004; ¥ p = 0.02; Φ p≤0.001; ω p = 0.305; δ p = 0.66; ж p = 0.013; ю p = 0.002.
Discussion
In the present study we have characterized for the first time, in vivo with SD-OCT as well as ex vivo with fluorescence microscopy, the effects of a small phototoxic retinal lesion on the survival of L- and S-cones in the adult albino rat retina. Using a blue (400 nm) LED, molecular markers to identify L- and S-cones as well as recently developed technology to image their distribution and to count automatically the population of L- or S-cones, we document that blue-LED-induced phototoxicity (LIP) is a reproducible and quantifiable model to study light-induced cone degeneration. We also show that SD-OCT is a reliable technique to examine in vivo the effects of LIP. Moreover, intravitreal administration of BDNF, PEDF or bFGF, or topical administration of BMD results in significant cone neuroprotection against phototoxicity-induced degeneration.
For the present experiments albino rats were chosen instead of pigmented because of their greatest sensibility to light-induced retinal damage. Previous studies from our group and others have documented that light damage to the retina depends in addition to light source and duration of exposure, on eye pigmentation [7], [74]–[76] as well as light wavelength [77], [78]. Furthermore, it has been documented that in contrast to pigmented rats [7], [12], [13], [74], in albino rats, pupil dilation is not necessary for the damage to occur [13]. However, in albino rats, mydriasis increases the phototoxic damage [13].
Our in vivo image analysis using SD-OCT showed that retinal damage induced by LED was circumscribed to a circular region that decreased from 1 to 7 days after LIP. Such a well-defined circle of damage might be due to a combination of the source of light by the LED and the rat's optics that concentrate irradiation into a well-defined circular area of the retina, as has been shown for other specific sources of light [79], [80]. It is possible that the decrease in the main diameter of the region affected that occurs from day 1 to day 7 relates to the presence of a transient inflammatory reaction at the peripheral border of the lesion which would resolve in the following days. Indeed, the observation that the areas lacking L- or S-opsin immunoreactivity at 7 and 30 days were comparable indicates that such a diminution in size is completed by one week after LIP. We cannot discard however that such a decrease in the size of the lesion is due to the migration of surrounding photoreceptors into the lesion, as has been shown to occur in adult pigmented rats up to three weeks after focal loss of photoreceptors induced by 380 nm light [79].
The distribution of L- and S-cones in the albino rat retina is not homogeneous, with marked regional variations in their densities. Of particular interest is that L-cones densities parallel highest RGC densities, whereas highest S-cone densities are found within the retinal rim and inferotemporal quadrant, where the lowest L-cone densities appear [1], [6], [73]. Thus, although the rat retina does not have a macula or fovea, its cone to rod ratio is similar to that of the human retina and more importantly it has a defined retinal specialized area in the temporal tip of the visual streak with maximum L-cone densities that may be used to study cone-photoreceptor injury. Our results show in the light-exposed retinas a circular region with focal loss of L- and S-opsin immunoreactivity, consistently located in the highest L-cone density region of the retina. In addition to this focal lesion, total counts in retinal wholemounts indicate that there was also a diffuse loss of cones within the retina, but this was more apparent and only statistically significant for the S-cones. The possibility that a small fraction of the light provided by the LED is scattered throughout the retina and absorbed elsewhere on the retina could explain the diffuse cone-photoreceptor cell loss. In previous experiments in which retinal damage was induced by diffuse light in rats, photoreceptor degeneration was maximal in an arciform region of the dorsal retina [12], [23], an area that has been termed the “photosensitive area” of the rat retina, but there was also diffuse loss of photoreceptors throughout the retina [12], [12], [15], [68], [74], [81], [82,83]. The inter-animal variability in total number of cones [1], [2] as well as the fact that the circular region with diminished numbers of cones represented only approximately 1.3% of the entire retinal area (Table 3), might explain why the overall total number of L-cones was not modified significantly. Previous studies have indicated that blue light is highly phototoxic to photoreceptors, and that specific light sources of light could result in focal lesions that did not progress with time [79], [80]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the outcome of the L- or S-cone population had not been specifically investigated before, mainly because the specific tools presently used were not available [84] and cones only represent, as a whole, approximately 1% of the photoreceptor population [64], [65].
Our present studies have relied on the identification of cone-outer segments with immunohistochemistry, using specific antibodies against specific L- or S-cone opsins. It has been shown that the expression of specific opsin proteins within cone-photoreceptors may be modified and even disappear after retinal injury [42], and this may lead to misinterpretation of cone-photoreceptor cell survival. However, both our OCT analysis in vivo as well as our ex vivo cross-section analysis indicate that in the regions lacking cone-photoreceptors there were no other cell nuclei, thus further confirming the absence of both cones and rods. In our studies LIP results in massive focal loss of cone and rod photoreceptors and as previously suggested [79], [80], it is likely that blue light affects RPE cells and induces the loss of both rods and cones (see below). However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for such a massive loss of photoreceptors remain a matter for future studies. Here we have chosen a blue-light emitting diode as a source of light irradiation because it induces particularly harmful phototoxicity [11], [85], [86]. Photochemical damage may involve the formation of free radicals and thus oxidative stress following excessive photoreceptor photopigment activation [7] or the effect of short wave length linked to chemical changes in lipofuscin [9]. In our studies, the blue-LED provided 400 nm light, and this has been shown to induce retinal pigment epithelium photoxicity [87], [88] mediated by lipofuscin [10]. Indeed, cryostat cross-sections stained with methylene blue showed that the retinal pigment eptithelium is largely affected in the focal area of retinal lesion. Moreover, the specific toxicity of short wave-lengths has been related to the chromophore present in lipofuscin (the A2E, N-retinylidine-N-retinylethanolamine) [10] and this has also been shown in vitro [89].
A large number of experimental studies have established the neuroprotective effects of alpha-2 selective agonists against a variety of retinal injury models [90]–[93] including transient ischemia-induced RGC loss [94]–[97], ocular hypertension induced retinal damage [98] and light-induced photoreceptor degeneration [21]. However, a neuroprotective effect on L- and S-cones against LIP had not been shown before, and it is possible that its mechanism of action is related to upregulation of trophic factors that contribute to neuronal survival [24], [99] or to the activation of extracellular signal-activated kinases [100] or to the transactivation of epidermal growth factors [101] through Müller cells activation.
Trophic factors are endogenous substances with critical functions during neuronal development and survival. In general their functions are related to promote proliferation, regeneration, maturation and/or survival of neurons [20]. For example, intravitreal administration of neurotrophins such as BFNF, neurotrophin-4 and CNTF has been shown to prevent ON injury-induced RGC death [71], [102]–[104]. Exogenous administration of these substances has been shown to have an important role in treating degenerative retinal diseases due to an increased expression in the target cells [105]. Previous studies on the effects of intravitreal administration of trophic factors including BDNF [25], [26], [28], [29], [34], [35], PEDF [22], [106], [107], bFGF [21], [33], [108], or CNTF [29], [108]–[112] have shown prevention of phototoxic-induced neurodegeneration of photoreceptors [20]. Overall, our results are in agreement with these studies, but differ in that we have studied and documented selectively the neuroprotection of L- and S-cones against LIP and also in that in our studies CNTF did not confer neuroprotection. The mechanism of action of these trophic factors to prevent light-induced phototoxicity is probably direct and indirect through Müller cells [113], [114] or enhancing rod-photoreceptor survival [115], and it is possible that at the doses used in our experiments CNTF failed to produce neuroprotection. Indeed, in the present studies we have used an intravitreal injection of 0.4 µg of CNTF, a dose that is several orders of magnitude greater than that reported to afford photoreceptor neuroprotection [29], and other studies have shown that high doses of intravitreal CNTF have functional and morphological deleterious effects on adult rat photoreceptors [32], [111].
In summary, a detailed quantitative study taking into account the whole population of cone-photoreceptors, as well as its topological representation following light-induced damage had not been reported before. The present studies document for the first time that blue LED-induced phototoxicity is a reproducible and quantifiable model of focal cone degeneration induced in the rat visual streak to study light-induced cone degeneration, which might be assessed in vivo with SD-OCT. This is even more relevant if one takes into account that, on average, approximately 99% of the rat photoreceptors are rods while cone-photoreceptors account for only 1% [64], [65]. Intravitreal administration of BDNF, PEDF or bFGF but not CNTF, or topical administration of BMD results in significant cone neuroprotection against phototoxicity induced degeneration. It is anticipated that the present studies may lay the foundations for further studies analyzing the effect of other strategies aimed to prevent light-induced cone degeneration.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank JM Diaz LLopis (W. M. Bloss, S.A. Barcelona, Spain) for kindly providing the Spectralis OCT system (Heidelgerg Engineering) for these studies.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Fundación Séneca: 04446/GERM/07; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness: SAF-2012-38328; ISCIII-FEDER: PI10/01496, PI10/00187; RETICS: RD07/0062/0001; and an unrestricted grant from Allergan Sales LLC. to MVS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Ortín-Martínez A, Jiménez-López M, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Salinas-Navarro M, Alarcón-Martínez L, et al. (2010) Automated quantification and topographical distribution of the whole population of S- and L-cones in adult albino and pigmented rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3171–3183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ortín-Martínez A, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Jiménez-López M, Alburquerque-Béjar JJ, Nieto-López L, et al. (2014) Number and Distribution of Mouse Retinal Cone Photoreceptors: Differences between an Albino (Swiss) and a Pigmented (C57/BL6) Strain. PLoS One 9:e102392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ortín-Martínez A, Salinas-Navarro M, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Jiménez-López M, Valiente-Soriano FJ, et al.. (2014) Ocular hypertension in adult rats results in protracted severe loss of cone-photoreceptors. Exp Eye Res (Submitted). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6. Nadal-Nicolás FM, Jiménez-López M, Sobrado-Calvo P, Nieto-López L, Cánovas-Martínez I, et al. (2009) Brn3a as a marker of retinal ganglion cells: qualitative and quantitative time course studies in naive and optic nerve-injured retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:3860–3868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Noell WK, Walker VS, Kang BS, Berman S (1966) Retinal damage by light in rats. Invest Ophthalmol 5:450–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Strauss O (2005) The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev 85:845–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ham WT Jr, Ruffolo JJ Jr, Mueller HA, Clarke AM, Moon ME (1978) Histologic analysis of photochemical lesions produced in rhesus retina by short-wave-length light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:1029–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hunter JJ, Morgan JI, Merigan WH, Sliney DH, Sparrow JR, et al. (2012) The susceptibility of the retina to photochemical damage from visible light. Prog Retin Eye Res 31:28–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Organisciak DT, Vaughan DK (2010) Retinal light damage: mechanisms and protection. Prog Retin Eye Res 29:113–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Marco-Gomariz MA, Hurtado-Montalbán N, Vidal-Sanz M, Lund RD, Villegas-Pérez MP (2006) Phototoxic-induced photoreceptor degeneration causes retinal ganglion cell degeneration in pigmented rats. J Comp Neurol 498:163–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. García-Ayuso D, Salinas-Navarro M, Agudo-Barriuso M, Alarcón-Martínez L, Vidal-Sanz M, et al. (2011) Retinal ganglion cell axonal compression by retinal vessels in light-induced retinal degeneration. Mol Vis 17:1716–1733. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Montalbán-Soler L, Alarcón-Martínez L, Jiménez-López M, Salinas-Navarro M, Galindo-Romero C, et al. (2012) Retinal compensatory changes after light damage in albino mice. Mol Vis 18:675–693. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Marc RE, Jones BW, Watt CB, Vazquez-Chona F, Vaughan DK, et al. (2008) Extreme retinal remodeling triggered by light damage: implications for age related macular degeneration. Mol Vis 14:782–806. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Taylor HR, West S, Muñoz B, Rosenthal FS, Bressler SB, et al. (1992) The long-term effects of visible light on the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 110:99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Nondahl DM (2001) Sunlight and the 5-year incidence of early age-related maculopathy: the beaver dam eye study. Arch Ophthalmol 119:246–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Muñoz B, et al. (2004) Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122:477–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Beatty S, Koh H, Phil M, Henson D, Boulton M (2000) The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 45:115–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kolomeyer AM, Zarbin MA (2014) Trophic factors in the pathogenesis and therapy for retinal degenerative diseases. Surv Ophthalmol 59:134–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wen R, Cheng T, Li Y, Cao W, Steinberg RH (1996) Alpha 2-adrenergic agonists induce basic fibroblast growth factor expression in photoreceptors in vivo and ameliorate light damage. J Neurosci 16:5986–5992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cao W, Tombran-Tink J, Elias R, Sezate S, Mrazek D, et al. (2001) In vivo protection of photoreceptors from light damage by pigment epithelium-derived factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1646–1652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Faktorovich EG, Steinberg RH, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, LaVail MM (1992) Basic fibroblast growth factor and local injury protect photoreceptors from light damage in the rat. J Neurosci 12:3554–3567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gao H, Qiao X, Cantor LB, WuDunn D (2002) Up-regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression by brimonidine in rat retinal ganglion cells. Arch Ophthalmol 120:797–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gauthier R, Joly S, Pernet V, Lachapelle P, Di Polo A (2005) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene delivery to muller glia preserves structure and function of light-damaged photoreceptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3383–3392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hojo M, Abe T, Sugano E, Yoshioka Y, Saigo Y, et al. (2004) Photoreceptor protection by iris pigment epithelial transplantation transduced with AAV-mediated brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3721–3726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Joly S, Pernet V, Chemtob S, Di Polo A, Lachapelle P (2007) Neuroprotection in the juvenile rat model of light-induced retinopathy: evidence suggesting a role for FGF-2 and CNTF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2311–2320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kano T, Abe T, Tomita H, Sakata T, Ishiguro S, et al. (2002) Protective effect against ischemia and light damage of iris pigment epithelial cells transfected with the BDNF gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:3744–3753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. LaVail MM, Unoki K, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, Yancopoulos GD, et al. (1992) Multiple growth factors, cytokines, and neurotrophins rescue photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11249–11253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. LaVail MM, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, Lau-Villacorta C, Unoki K, et al. (1998) Protection of mouse photoreceptors by survival factors in retinal degenerations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:592–602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Masuda K, Watanabe I, Unoki K, Ohba N, Muramatsu T (1995) Functional Rescue of photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light by survival-promoting factors in the rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:2142–2146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McGill TJ, Prusky GT, Douglas RM, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, et al. (2007) Intraocular CNTF reduces vision in normal rats in a dose-dependent manner. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5756–5766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. O'Driscoll C, O'Connor J, O'Brien CJ, Cotter TG (2008) Basic fibroblast growth factor-induced protection from light damage in the mouse retina in vivo. J Neurochem 105:524–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Okoye G, Zimmer J, Sung J, Gehlbach P, Deering T, et al. (2003) Increased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor preserves retinal function and slows cell death from rhodopsin mutation or oxidative damage. J Neurosci 23:4164–4172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wilson RB, Kunchithapautham K, Rohrer B (2007) Paradoxical role of BDNF: BDNF+/- retinas are protected against light damage-mediated stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2877–2886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Vidal-Sanz M, Osborne NN (2004) The effect of retinal ganglion cell injury on light-induced photoreceptor degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:685–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Villegas-Pérez MP, Vidal-Sanz M, Lund RD (1996) Mechanism of retinal ganglion cell loss in inherited retinal dystrophy. Neuroreport 7:1995–1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Villegas-Pérez MP, Lawrence JM, Vidal-Sanz M, Lavail MM, Lund RD (1998) Ganglion cell loss in RCS rat retina: a result of compression of axons by contracting intraretinal vessels linked to the pigment epithelium. J Comp Neurol 392:58–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wang S, Villegas-Pérez MP, Vidal-Sanz M, Lund RD (2000) Progressive optic axon dystrophy and vacuslar changes in rd mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:537–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wang S, Villegas-Pérez MP, Holmes T, Lawrence JM, Vidal-Sanz M, et al. (2003) Evolving neurovascular relationships in the RCS rat with age. Curr Eye Res 27:183–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. García-Ayuso D, Salinas-Navarro M, Agudo M, Cuenca N, Pinilla I, et al. (2010) Retinal ganglion cell numbers and delayed retinal ganglion cell death in the P23H rat retina. Exp Eye Res 91:800–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. García-Ayuso D, Ortín-Martínez A, Jiménez-López M, Galindo-Romero C, Cuenca N, et al. (2013) Changes in the photoreceptor mosaic of P23H-1 rats during retinal degeneration: implications for rod-cone dependent survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:5888–5900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. García-Ayuso D, Salinas-Navarro M, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Ortín-Martínez A, Agudo-Barriuso M, et al. (2014) Sectorial loss of retinal ganglion cells in inherited photoreceptor degeneration is due to RGC death. Br J Ophthalmol 98:396–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Galindo-Romero C, Valiente-Soriano FJ, Jiménez-López M, García-Ayuso D, Villegas-Pérez MP, et al. (2013) Effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on mouse axotomized retinal ganglion cells and phagocytic microglia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:974–985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Nadal-Nicolás FM, Salinas-Navarro M, Jiménez-López M, Sobrado-Calvo P, Villegas-Pérez MP, et al. (2014) Displaced retinal ganglion cells in albino and pigmented rats. Front Neuroanat 8:99 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Valiente-Soriano FJ, García-Ayuso D, Ortín-Martínez A, Jiménez-López M, Galindo-Romero C, et al.. (2014) Distribution of melanopsin positive neurons in pigmented and albino mice: Evidence for melanopsin interneurons in the mouse retina. Front Neuroanat In Press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47. Jehle T, Dimitriu C, Auer S, Knoth R, Vidal-Sanz M, et al. (2008) The neuropeptide NAP provides neuroprotection against retinal ganglion cell damage after retinal ischemia and optic nerve crush. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:1255–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Cuenca N, Pinilla I, Fernández-Sánchez L, Salinas-Navarro M, Alarcón-Martínez L, et al. (2010) Changes in the inner and outer retinal layers after acute increase of the intraocular pressure in adult albino Swiss mice. Exp Eye Res 91:273–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Schnebelen C, Pasquis B, Salinas-Navarro M, Joffre C, Creuzot-Garcher CP, et al. (2009) A dietary combination of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids is more efficient than single supplementations in the prevention of retinal damage induced by elevation of intraocular pressure in rats. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247:1191–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sánchez-Migallón MC, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Jiménez-López M, Sobrado-Calvo P, Vidal-Sanz M, et al. (2011) Brain derived neurotrophic factor maintains Brn3a expression in axotomized rat retinal ganglion cells. Exp Eye Res 92:260–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Galindo-Romero C, Avilés-Trigueros M, Jiménez-López M, Valiente-Soriano FJ, Salinas-Navarro M, et al. (2011) Axotomy-induced retinal ganglion cell death in adult mice: quantitative and topographic time course analyses. Exp Eye Res 92:377–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Galindo-Romero C, Jiménez-López M, García-Ayuso D, Salinas-Navarro M, Nadal-Nicolás FM, et al. (2013) Number and spatial distribution of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the adult albino rat. Exp Eye Res 108:84–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ramírez AI, Salazar JJ, de Hoz R, Rojas B, Gallego BI, et al. (2010) Quantification of the effect of different levels of IOP in the astroglia of the rat retina ipsilateral and contralateral to experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5690–5696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nguyen JV, Soto I, Kim KY, Bushong EA, Oglesby E, et al. (2011) Myelination transition zone astrocytes are constitutively phagocytic and have synuclein dependent reactivity in glaucoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:1176–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Kagemann L, Xu J, et al. (2011) Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:2425–2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Podoleanu AG (2012) Optical coherence tomography. J Microsc 247:209–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Provis JM, Dubis AM, Maddess T, Carroll J (2013) Adaptation of the central retina for high acuity vision: cones, the fovea and the avascular zone. Prog Retin Eye Res 35:63–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Berger A, Cavallero S, Dominguez E, Barbe P, Simonutti M, et al. (2014) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the rodent eye: highlighting layers of the outer retina using signal averaging and comparison with histology. PLoS One 9:e96494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Dai X, Han J, Qi Y, Zhang H, Xiang L, et al. (2014) AAV-mediated lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (Lpcat1) gene replacement therapy rescues retinal degeneration in rd11 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:1724–1734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Liu Y, McDowell CM, Zhang Z, Tebow HE, Wordinger RJ, et al. (2014) Monitoring retinal morphologic and functional changes in mice following optic nerve crush. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:3766–3774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Yang Y, Ng TK, Ye C, Yip YW, Law K, et al. (2014) Assessing sodium iodate-induced outer retinal changes in rats using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:1696–1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. La Vail MM (1976) Survival of some photoreceptor cells in albino rats following long-term exposure to continuous light. Invest Ophthalmol 15:64–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Szél Á, Röhlich P (1992) Two cone types of rat retina detected by anti-visual pigment antibodies. Exp Eye Res 55:47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Valiente-Soriano FJ, Ortin-Martinez A, Garcia-Ayuso D, Jimenez Lopez M, Alarcon-Martines L, et al.. (2014) Characterization of a new model of focal cone degeneration induced by a Light-emitting-diode (LED). IOVS 2014; 55: ARVO E-Abstract 4368.
- 67.Ortín-Martínez A, Valiente-Soriano FJ, Garcia-Ayuso D, Jimenez Lopez M, Alarcon-Martines L, et al.. (2014) Cone neuroprotection afforded by Brimonidine and BDNF in a new model of focal Light-Emitting-Diode (LED)-induced phototoxicity. IOVS 2014; 55: ARVO E-Abstract 4369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68. Vaughan DK, Nemke JL, Fliesler SJ, Darrow RM, Organisciak DT (2002) Evidence for a circadian rhythm of susceptibility to retinal light damage. Photochem Photobiol 75:547–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Organisciak DT, Darrow RM, Barsalou L, Kutty RK, Wiggert B (2000) Circadian-dependent retinal light damage in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:3694–3701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Tsukahara N, Tani Y, Kikuchi H, Sugita S (2014) Light transmission of the ocular media in birds and mammals. J Vet Med Sci 76:93–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Vidal-Sanz M, Lafuente M, Sobrado-Calvo P, Selles-Navarro I, Rodriguez E, et al. (2000) Death and neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cells after different types of injury. Neurotox Res 2:215–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Sobrado-Calvo P, Vidal-Sanz M, Villegas-Pérez MP (2007) Rat retinal microglial cells under normal conditions, after optic nerve section, and after optic nerve section and intravitreal injection of trophic factors or macrophage inhibitory factor. J Comp Neurol 501:866–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Nadal-Nicolás FM, Jiménez-López M, Salinas-Navarro M, Sobrado-Calvo P, Alburquerque-Béjar JJ, et al. (2012) Whole number, distribution and co-expression of brn3 transcription factors in retinal ganglion cells of adult albino and pigmented rats. PLoS One 7:e49830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Rapp LM, Williams TP (1980) The role of ocular pigmentation in protecting against retinal light damage. Vision Res 20:1127–1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. LaVail MM, Gorrin GM (1987) Protection from light damage by ocular pigmentation: analysis using experimental chimeras and translocation mice. Exp Eye Res 44:877–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wasowicz M, Morice C, Ferrari P, Callebert J, Versaux-Botteri C (2002) Long-term effects of light damage on the retina of albino and pigmented rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:813–820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Remé CE, Grimm C, Hafezi F, Wenzel A, Williams TP (2000) Apoptosis in the Retina: The Silent Death of Vision. News Physiol Sci 15:120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Glickman RD (2002) Phototoxicity to the retina: mechanisms of damage. Int J Toxicol 21:473–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Busch EM, Gorgels TG, Van Norren D (1999) Filling-in after focal loss of photoreceptors in rat retina. Exp Eye Res 68:485–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Busch EM, Gorgels TG, van Norren D (1999) Temporal sequence of changes in rat retina after UV-A and blue light exposure. Vision Res 39:1233–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Williams TP, Howell WL (1983) Action spectrum of retinal light-damage in albino rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:285–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Borges JM, Edward DP, Tso MO (1990) A comparative study of photic injury in four inbred strains of albino rats. Curr Eye Res 9:799–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Tanito M, Kaidzu S, Ohira A, Anderson RE (2008) Topography of retinal damage in light-exposed albino rats. Exp Eye Res 87:292–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Vidal-Sanz M, Salinas-Navarro M, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Alarcón-Martínez L, Valiente-Soriano FJ, et al. (2012) Understanding glaucomatous damage: anatomical and functional data from ocular hypertensive rodent retinas. Prog Retin Eye Res 31:1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. van Norren D, Schellekens P (1990) Blue light hazard in rat. Vision Res 30:1517–1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Gorgels TG, van Norren D (1995) Ultraviolet and green light cause different types of damage in rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:851–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Fishkin NE, Sparrow JR, Allikmets R, Nakanishi K (2005) Isolation and characterization of a retinal pigment epithelial cell fluorophore: an all-trans-retinal dimer conjugate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7091–7096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kim SR, Jang YP, Jockusch S, Fishkin NE, Turro NJ, et al. (2007) The all-trans-retinal dimer series of lipofuscin pigments in retinal pigment epithelial cells in a recessive Stargardt disease model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19273–19278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Arnault E, Barrau C, Nanteau C, Gondouin P, Bigot K, et al. (2013) Phototoxic action spectrum on a retinal pigment epithelium model of age-related macular degeneration exposed to sunlight normalized conditions. PLoS One 8:e71398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Wheeler L, WoldeMussie E, Lai R (2003) Role of alpha-2 agonists in neuroprotection. Surv Ophthalmol 48:S47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Saylor M, McLoon LK, Harrison AR, Lee MS (2009) Experimental and clinical evidence for brimonidine as an optic nerve and retinal neuroprotective agent: an evidence-based review. Arch Ophthalmol 127:402–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Kusari J, Zhou SX, Padillo E, Clarke KG, Gil DW (2010) Inhibition of vitreoretinal VEGF elevation and blood-retinal barrier breakdown in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats by brimonidine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1044–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kusari J, Padillo E, Zhou SX, Bai Y, Wang J, et al. (2011) Effect of brimonidine on retinal and choroidal neovascularization in a mouse model of retinopathy of prematurity and laser-treated rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:5424–5431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Lafuente López-Herrera MP, Mayor-Torroglosa S, Miralles de Imperial J, Villegas-Pérez MP, Vidal-Sanz M (2002) Transient ischemia of the retina results in altered retrograde axoplasmic transport: neuroprotection with b brimonidine. Exp Neurol 178:243–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Avilés-Trigueros M, Mayor-Torroglosa S, García-Avilés A, Lafuente MP, Rodríguez ME, et al. (2003) Transient ischemia of the retina results in massive degeneration of the retinotectal projection: long-term neuroprotection with brimonidine. Exp Neurol 184:767–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Mayor-Torroglosa S, De la Villa P, Rodríguez ME, López-Herrera MP, Avilés-Trigueros M, et al. (2005) Ischemia results 3 months later in altered ERG, degeneration of inner layers, and deafferented tectum: neuroprotection with brimonidine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3825–3835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Vidal-Sanz M, de la Villa P, Avilés-Trigueros M, Mayor-Torroglosa S, Salinas-Navarro M, et al. (2007) Neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cell function and their central nervous system targets. Eye 21:S42–S45. [Google Scholar]
- 98. Lambert WS, Ruiz L, Crish SD, Wheeler LA, Calkins DJ (2011) Brimonidine prevents axonal and somatic degeneration of retinal ganglion cell neurons. Mol Neurodegener 6:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Lönngren U, Näpänkangas U, Lafuente M, Mayor S, Lindqvist N, et al. (2006) The growth factor response in ischemic rat retina and superior colliculus after brimonidine pre-treatment. Brain Res Bull 71:208–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Peng M, Li Y, Luo Z, Liu C, Laties AM, et al. (1998) Alpha2-adrenergic agonists selectively activate extracellular signal-regulated kinases in Müller cells in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:1721–1726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Harun-Or-Rashid M, Lindqvist N, Hallböök F (2014) Transactivation of EGF receptors in chicken Müller cells by α2A-adrenergic receptors stimulated by brimonidine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:3385–3394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Mansour-Robaey S, Clarke DB, Wang YC, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ (1994) Effects of ocular injury and administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on survival and regrowth of axotomized retinal ganglion cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:1632–1636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Peinado-Ramón P, Salvador M, Villegas-Pérez MP, Vidal-Sanz M (1996) Effects of axotomy and intraocular administration of NT-4, NT-3, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor on the survival of adult rat retinal ganglion cells. A quantitative in vivo study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:489–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Parrilla-Reverter G, Agudo M, Sobrado-Calvo P, Salinas-Navarro M, Villegas-Pérez MP, et al. (2009) Effects of different neurotrophic factors on the survival of retinal ganglion cells after a complete intraorbital nerve crush injury: a quantitative in vivo study. Exp Eye Res 89:32–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Yang P, Wiser JL, Peairs JJ, Ebright JN, Zavodni ZJ, et al. (2005) Human RPE expression of cell survival factors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:1755–1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Imai D, Yoneya S, Gehlbach PL, Wei LL, Mori K (2005) Intraocular gene transfer of pigment epithelium-derived factor rescues photoreceptors from light-induced cell death. J Cell Physiol 202:570–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Paskowitz DM, Donohue-Rolfe KM, Yang H, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, et al. (2007) Neurotrophic factors minimize the retinal toxicity of verteporfin photodynamic therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:430–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Agarwal N, Martin E, Krishnamoorthy RR, Landers R, Wen R, et al. (2002) Levobetaxolol-induced Up-regulation of retinal bFGF and CNTF mRNAs and preservation of retinal function against a photic-induced retinopathy. Exp Eye Res 74:445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Li Y, Tao W, Luo L, Huang D, Kauper K, et al. (2010) CNTF induces regeneration of cone outer segments in a rat model of retinal degeneration. PLoS One 5:e9495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Wen R, Song Y, Kjellstrom S, Tanikawa A, Liu Y, et al. (2006) Regulation of rod phototransduction machinery by ciliary neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 26:13523–13530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Wen R, Tao W, Li Y, Sieving PA (2012) CNTF and retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 31:136–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Wen R, Tao W, Luo L, Huang D, Kauper K, et al. (2012) Regeneration of cone outer segments induced by CNTF. Adv Exp Med Biol 723:93–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Peterson WM, Wang Q, Tzekova R, Wiegand SJ (2000) Ciliary neurotrophic factor and stress stimuli activate the Jak-STAT pathway in retinal neurons and glia. J Neurosci20:4081–4090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Ueki Y, Chollangi S, Le YZ, Ash JD (2010) gp130 activation in Müller cells is not essential for photoreceptor protection from light damage. Adv Exp Med Biol 664:655–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Léveillard T, Mohand-Saïd S, Lorentz O, Hicks D, Fintz AC, et al. (2004) Identification and characterization of rod-derived cone viability factor. Nat Genet 36:755–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper.