Abstract
Infection with Candida species is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in infants. The incidence of Candida infection varies widely across centers, likely due to differences in practice related to modifiable risk factors such as exposure to empiric antibiotics and length of parenteral nutrition. Early diagnosis of Candida and prompt treatment with appropriate antifungal agents, such as fluconazole, amphotericin B deoxycholate, and micafungin, are critical for improved outcomes. This paper reviews the current literature relating to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Candida infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Keywords: Candida, neonatal intensive care unit, diagnosis, prevention, antifungal therapy
Introduction
Infection with Candida species is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in infants. Extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1000 g) infants carry the highest burden of disease. The incidence of candidiasis in ELBW infants is approximately 10%, although it varies as much as 20-fold between centers.1,2 Neonatal candidiasis is associated with 20% mortality, and 50% of survivors have severe neurodevelopmental impairment.3 End-organ damage in the central nervous system, heart, and genitourinary tract is also common.4 Few clinical signs or laboratory assays have been validated for candidiasis in infants, thus prevention of infection is critical. When infection occurs, treatment with appropriate antimicrobial agents must be prompt.
Diagnosis
The blood culture is the gold standard for detection of candidiasis, although its sensitivity is poor.5 Even with multiple organs infected with candidiasis, the sensitivity of blood culture to detect infection in adults is only 50%.6 The small blood volume used for culture in infants makes isolation of Candida species in blood (candidemia) even more difficult. Because four or more vital organs are typically involved prior to documentation of candidemia, a positive blood culture for Candida should almost never be considered a contaminant and should generally be regarded as the “tip of the iceberg” for infection. Even when blood culture is able to diagnose Candida, the time to detection of the organism can be problematic - median time to detection of Candida species from blood culture in infants is 36 hours and increases to 42 hours when the infant is receiving antifungal therapy.7
Even more difficult than diagnosing candidemia is diagnosis of central nervous system involvement. Only 37% of infants with proven candidal meningitis also had positive blood cultures for Candida.8 In addition, normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters are present in almost half of infants with candidal meningitis.
Given the limitations of culture for the diagnosis of Candida infections, laboratory investigators have begun to explore other methods. 1,3-β-D-glucan is a fungal cell wall component that has been used to diagnose a variety of fungal infections, including Candida. Levels of this polysaccharide can be detected spectrophotometrically. Although several studies have shown promising results in adult leukemic patients with relatively high specificity for this method, the sensitivity is only 50-60%.9,10 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing has also been used to detect Candida DNA in blood and serum samples. This method has yielded promising results based on several small studies, with sensitivity to detect fungal disease equal to or higher than blood culture.11,12 Enzyme and PCR assays, however, remain experimental methods. These tests have not been validated in infants, and further studies are needed to evaluate their usefulness.
Prevention
Previous investigators have identified risk factors associated with Candida infection in infants.3,13 Some of these risk factors, such as gestational age and birth weight, cannot be altered. However, multiple modifiable risk factors have been identified; foremost among these is prolonged exposure to empiric antibiotics (greater than 48 hours despite negative blood cultures) and exposure to third-generation cephalosporins and other broadly-acting antibiotics such as carbapenems and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Differences in practices related to these risk factors likely account for the widely varying incidence of Candida infection across centers. For prevention of Candida infection, the following steps should be taken: 1) avoid the use of third-generation cephalosporins; 2) avoid the use of unnecessarily prolonged courses of antibiotics; 3) minimize the use of foreign bodies such as central venous or arterial catheters and other hardware; and 4) institute strict hand hygiene policies.
If, despite these measures, Candida incidence remains high (greater than 10% within a particular gestational age or birth weight stratum), then antifungal prophylaxis should be considered for high-risk infants. Fluconazole prophylaxis has been shown to reduce colonization and prevent invasive fungal infection.14,15 The recommended dose of fluconazole is 6 mg/kg twice weekly.16
Treatment
Prompt treatment is critical to improving outcomes for infants with candidiasis. If clinicians await a positive blood culture prior to starting therapy, treatment can be delayed as much as 72 hours. In ELBW infants, empirical antifungal therapy (receipt of therapy on the day of or the day before the first positive blood culture for Candida) is associated with increased survival without neurodevelopmental impairment.17 Thus, empirical antifungal therapy should be considered in high-risk infants once Candida infection is suspected. Infants at highest risk for Candida who may benefit most from empirical antifungal therapy include those less than 25 weeks gestational age, those with thrombocytopenia at time of blood culture, and those with a history of third-generation cephalosporin or carbapenem exposure in the seven days before blood culture.18
Suitable selection of antifungal therapy at adequate dosages is crucial. Antifungal agents act via a variety of mechanisms, including inhibition of cell wall or cell membrane synthesis, disruption of cell membrane integrity, and interference with fungal DNA and RNA synthesis. For many of these agents, the appropriate dosing recommendations in infants have only recently been elucidated.
Polyenes
The polyene class of antifungals includes amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMBD), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB), and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC). These agents act by binding to ergosterol (a sterol in fungal cell membranes), resulting in the leaking of small organic molecules and eventual cell death. AMBD is the most commonly used agent to treat systemic Candida infections in infants,19 and recommended dosing is 1 mg/kg/day. Studies of AMBD and amphotericin B lipid products in infants have demonstrated efficacy of these agents in the treatment of candidiasis.20,21 A recent cohort study of infants, however, reported higher mortality in infants treated with amphotericin B lipid products compared to those treated with AMBD.22 These results potential may be explained by lower concentrations of the liposomal formulations in the kidneys,23 which are prime locations for end-organ damage due to candidiasis in infants.4 Few data are available to guide dosing of amphotericin B lipid products, although a dose of 5 mg/kg/day of liposomal amphotericin B is generally considered reasonable.
5-fluorocytosine
5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) is an antifungal agent that is converted to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by fungal cells. 5-FU is then converted to other metabolites that disrupt fungal DNA and RNA synthesis. 5-FC is almost exclusively used in combination with other antifungal therapies, as monotherapy with 5-FC can lead to resistant organisms. 5-FC may be associated with delayed clearance of Candida from the CSF in neonates.3 5-FC toxicity is a concern particularly in infants of low birth weight who may be at risk for developing high concentrations of drug due to renal immaturity.24 5-FC is also poorly tolerated and can cause gastrointestinal upset, resulting in delayed feeding. This product is not recommended for use in the nursery, but if it is used, therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary.25
Triazoles
The triazole antifungal class includes fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. These drugs represent an oral alternative to intravenous antifungal therapies. Triazoles inhibit a cytochrome P–450-dependent enzyme (lanosterol c14 demethylase) that is needed to make ergosterol, a sterol of fungal cell membranes. Fluconazole has excellent activity against Candida and is used routinely in infants. Itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole can also be used to treat Candida, although their primary use is their extended spectrum activity against molds.
Of the mold-active agents, only voriconazole has been studied in infants. Pharmacokinetic analysis of voriconazole has revealed extreme variability in serum concentration with respect to weight-based dosage.26 The unpredictable pharmacokinetic response combined with known hepatotoxicity of this agent underscores the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Thus, except in rare cases of Aspergillus infection or infection with Candida species resistant to fluconazole (such as C. glabrata or C. krusei), voriconazole should be considered a drug of last resort in the intensive care nursery.
Fluconazole has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of invasive candidiasis in infants.27 Although fluconazole is renally excreted with minimal hepatic metabolism, its most concerning side effect is hepatotoxicity that is not related to amount or duration of exposure. Fluconazole dosing adjustments therefore are made based on renal function rather than liver function. Because fluconazole exhibits fungistatic activity that is time-dependent, optimal dosing incorporates area-under-the-curve (AUC) dosing target. Adult dosing of fluconazole in stable patients consists of a loading dose of 800 mg (12 mg/kg) followed by 400 mg (6 mg/kg) daily.24 This dosing provides adequate drug for adults to maintain an AUC of 400–800 mg*hr/L. To achieve similar exposures, infants require 12 mg/kg/day.16,28 In addition, a loading dose of 25 mg/kg results in more rapid achievement of therapeutic levels and was found to be safe in a small cohort of infants.29 Because more immature infants have delayed clearance of fluconazole, infants who are less than 30 weeks gestational age and less than 2 weeks postnatal age who have a creatinine level >1 mg/dL should be given a loading dose of 12 mg/kg.16 Creatinine level should be monitored, and if creatinine remains >1 mg/dL, then 6 mg/kg/day dosing should be considered; if creatinine drops to <1 mg/dL, then 12 mg/kg/day should be continued.16
Echinocandins
The echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) act at the fungal cell wall and inhibit 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis. These agents do not penetrate the CSF, but they are able to penetrate brain tissue. The echinocandins do not, however, penetrate the vitreous; infants being considered for treatment with these agents must undergo dilated retinal exam to exclude endophthalmitis. Based on data from randomized controlled trials, the echinocandins are recommended as first-line agents in adults and older children for candidemia and disseminated candidiasis.24 In the intensive care nursery, the echinocandins are emerging as an alternative therapy for Candida infections. Most of the available neonatal pharmacokinetic data are for micafungin. Several pharmacokinetic studies of micafungin at doses ranging from 1.5–15 mg/kg/day have been performed in infants.30–33 The current recommended dose is 10 mg/kg/day, with no adjustment needed for renal or hepatic impairment.
Anidulafungin and caspofungin have been studied in older children, but few data are available to guide dosing in infants.34 Only a low dose of caspofungin (25 mg/m2/day) has been studied, and there is a risk for central nervous system under-dosing.35 Thus, anidulafungin and caspofungin are not first-line agents for candidiasis in the intensive care nursery.
Summary and recommendations
Candidiasis in the intensive care nursery results in substantial morbidity and mortality. Prevention of infection is possible via modification of risk factors. Early diagnosis is critical, and treatment should be initiated promptly with appropriate antifungal agents. Empirical antifungal therapy should be considered when Candida is suspected in ELBW infants. When infection with Candida is diagnosed, the following steps should be followed:
1) Central venous and arterial catheters should be removed. Temporary, peripheral access should be used for several days while the patient is receiving antifungal therapy until documentation of negative blood cultures.
- 2) First-line therapy for candidiasis should be initiated. Choice of therapy includes:
- Fluconazole 12 mg/kg/day (25 mg/kg loading dose)
- Amphotericin B deoxycholate 1 mg/kg/day
- Liposomal amphotericin B 5 mg/kg/day (if urine cultures are negative)
- Micafungin 10 mg/kg/day (if eye involvement is excluded)
3) Microbiologic clearance should be documented by exhaustive search, including CSF culture, urine culture, two negative blood cultures separated by greater than 24 hours, dilated retinal exam by an ophthalmologist, and echocardiogram. Abdominal or central nervous system imaging should be considered if there is concern about invasive candidiasis in these areas.
4) For uncomplicated candidemia or candiduria, length of therapy should be 21 days after microbiologic clearance. If cultures continue to be positive by day 7, the addition of a second agent should be considered.
5) Patients should undergo follow-up to assess neurodevelopmental outcome with intervention if needed.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Benjamin receives support from the United States government for his work in pediatric and neonatal clinical pharmacology (1R01HD057956-05, 1K24HD058735-05, and NICHD contract HHSN275201000003I) and the nonprofit organization Thrasher Research Fund for his work in neonatal candidiasis (www.thrasherresearch.org); he also receives research support from industry for neonatal and pediatric drug development (www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp).
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest Dr. Greenberg has no potential conflicts to disclose.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
Rachel G. Greenberg, Duke University Medical Center 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 504, Durham, NC 27705.
Daniel K. Benjamin, Jr., Duke University Medical Center; Duke Clinical Research Institute P.O. Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715.
References
- 1.Benjamin DK, Jr., Stoll BJ, Gantz MG, Walsh MC, Sanchez PJ, Das A, et al. Neonatal candidiasis: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e865–73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cotten CM, McDonald S, Stoll B, Goldberg RN, Poole K, Benjamin DK, Jr., et al. The association of third-generation cephalosporin use and invasive candidiasis in extremely low birth-weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):717–22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Benjamin DK, Jr., Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA, McDonald SA, Oh W, Higgins RD, et al. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):84–92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Benjamin DK, Jr., Poole C, Steinbach WJ, Rowen JL, Walsh TJ. Neonatal candidemia and end-organ damage: a critical appraisal of the literature using meta-analytic techniques. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):634–40. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones JM. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3(1):32–45. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berenguer J, Buck M, Witebsky F, Stock F, Pizzo PA, Walsh TJ. Lysis-centrifugation blood cultures in the detection of tissue-proven invasive candidiasis. Disseminated versus single-organ infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;17(2):103–9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schelonka RL, Moser SA. Time to positive culture results in neonatal Candida septicemia. J Pediatr. 2003;142(5):564–5. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Smith PB, Mangum B, Steinbach WJ, Alexander BD, Cotten CM, et al. Neonatal Candida meningitis: significance of cerebrospinal fluid parameters and blood cultures. J Perinatol. 2007;27(2):97–100. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lamoth F, Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Castagnola E, Lortholary O, Richardson M, et al. beta-Glucan antigenemia assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies from the Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-3) Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(5):633–43. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Senn L, Robinson JO, Schmidt S, Knaup M, Asahi N, Satomura S, et al. 1,3-Beta-D-glucan antigenemia for early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(6):878–85. doi: 10.1086/527382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wahyuningsih R, Freisleben HJ, Sonntag HG, Schnitzler P. Simple and rapid detection of Candida albicans DNA in serum by PCR for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(8):3016–21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.8.3016-3021.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morace G, Pagano L, Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, Mele L, Equitani F, et al. PCR-restriction enzyme analysis for detection of Candida DNA in blood from febrile patients with hematological malignancies. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(6):1871–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.6.1871-1875.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saiman L, Ludington E, Pfaller M, Rangel-Frausto S, Wiblin RT, Dawson J, et al. Risk factors for candidemia in neonatal intensive care unit patients. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey study group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(4):319–24. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200004000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaufman D, Boyle R, Hazen KC, Patrie JT, Robinson M, Donowitz LG. Fluconazole prophylaxis against fungal colonization and infection in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(23):1660–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Manzoni P, Stolfi I, Pugni L, Decembrino L, Magnani C, Vetrano G, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of prophylactic fluconazole in preterm neonates. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(24):2483–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wade KC, Benjamin DK, Jr., Kaufman DA, Ward RM, Smith PB, Jayaraman B, et al. Fluconazole dosing for the prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in young infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(8):717–23. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819f1f50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Greenberg RG, Benjamin DK, Gantz MG, Cotten CM, Stoll BJ, Walsh MC, et al. Empiric antifungal therapy and outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants with invasive candidiasis. J Pediatr. 2012;161(2):264–9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Benjamin DK, Jr., DeLong ER, Steinbach WJ, Cotton CM, Walsh TJ, Clark RH. Empirical therapy for neonatal candidemia in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):543–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prasad PA, Coffin SE, Leckerman KH, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE. Pediatric antifungal utilization: new drugs, new trends. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(12):1083–8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31817eeee5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Baley JE, Meyers C, Kliegman RM, Jacobs MR, Blumer JL. Pharmacokinetics, outcome of treatment, and toxic effects of amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine in neonates. J Pediatr. 1990;116(5):791–7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82674-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Juster-Reicher A, Leibovitz E, Linder N, Amitay M, Flidel-Rimon O, Even-Tov S, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in the treatment of neonatal candidiasis in very low birth weight infants. Infection. 2000;28(4):223–6. doi: 10.1007/s150100070040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ascher SB, Smith PB, Watt K, Benjamin DK, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Clark RH, et al. Antifungal therapy and outcomes in infants with invasive Candida infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(5):439–43. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182467a72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wurthwein G, Groll AH, Hempel G, Adler-Shohet FC, Lieberman JM, Walsh TJ. Population pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(12):5092–8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.12.5092-5098.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK, Jr., Calandra TF, Edwards JE, Jr., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(5):503–35. doi: 10.1086/596757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Soltani M, Tobin CM, Bowker KE, Sunderland J, MacGowan AP, Lovering AM. Evidence of excessive concentrations of 5-flucytosine in children aged below 12 years: a 12-year review of serum concentrations from a UK clinical assay reference laboratory. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28(6):574–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doby EH, Benjamin DK, Jr., Blaschke AJ, Ward RM, Pavia AT, Martin PL, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of voriconazole in children less than three years of age: a case report and summary of voriconazole concentrations for ten children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(6):632–5. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31824acc33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schwarze R, Penk A, Pittrow L. Treatment of candidal infections with fluconazole in neonates and infants. Eur J Med Res. 2000;5(5):203–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wade KC, Wu D, Kaufman DA, Ward RM, Benjamin DK, Jr., Sullivan JE, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in young infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(11):4043–9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00569-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Piper L, Smith PB, Hornik CP, Cheifetz IM, Barrett JS, Moorthy G, et al. Fluconazole loading dose pharmacokinetics and safety in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(5):375–8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318202cbb3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hope WW, Smith PB, Arrieta A, Buell DN, Roy M, Kaibara A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in neonates and young infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(6):2633–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01679-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hope WW, Mickiene D, Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Kelaher AM, Hughes JE, et al. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of micafungin in experimental hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis: implications for echinocandin therapy in neonates. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(1):163–71. doi: 10.1086/524063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Smith PB, Walsh TJ, Hope W, Arrieta A, Takada A, Kovanda LL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of an elevated dosage of micafungin in premature neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(5):412–5. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181910e2d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Heresi GP, Gerstmann DR, Reed MD, van den Anker JN, Blumer JL, Kovanda L, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(12):1110–5. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000245103.07614.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Benjamin DK, Jr., Piper L, Cheifetz IM, Moran C, Liu P, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose anidulafungin in infants and neonates. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(5):702–7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Saez-Llorens X, Macias M, Maiya P, Pineros J, Jafri HS, Chatterjee A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of caspofungin in neonates and infants less than 3 months of age. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(3):869–75. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00868-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]