Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR logoLink to Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR
. 2014 Oct 20;8(10):JM01–JM02. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9186.5067

An Intervention Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Among HIV Positive Individuals in Southern India

Lalitha Hande 1,, Sambajirao 2, Sanjeev Badiger 2
PMCID: PMC4253191  PMID: 25478373

As of today, only 25–30% of the people who are HIV positive in the country are aware of their HIV status. The challenge before us is to make all HIV-infected people aware of their status, so that they adopt healthy lifestyles and prevent the transmission of HIV to others, and access life-saving care and treatment. Thus, counselling and testing services are an important component of prevention and control of HIV/AIDS in the country. HIV counselling and testing services are also a key entry point to prevention of HIV infection and treatment. When availing counselling and testing services, people can access accurate information about HIV prevention and care, and undergo an HIV test in a supportive and confidential environment [1].

There is a need to study the effect of counselling or health education over the seropositive patients, so that they can adopt healthy life style to prevent HIV transmission. Therefore, the study was conducted in order to understand the Socio-demographic profile of patients and their knowledge, attitude and practice towards HIV and the effectiveness of the counselling/health education.

This cross-sectional study was conducted at an Integrated Counselling and Testing center (ICTC) of Government District hospital (a tertiary care hospital), one of the teaching hospitals attached to J.J.M. Medical College in Davanagere of Karnataka State, India.

The Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional ethical committee. Trained research assistants collected the data and recorded using pretested questionnaire. The data was collected for a period of two years i.e. from January 2008 to December 2009. During this period, total 210 seropositives for HIV attended the ICTC centre, were included in the study. After explaining the objectives of the study and assuring the confidentiality of the subjects to District Health Authorities, permission was obtained from the District Health Authorities and the in charge of the ICTC centre; following which the data was collected using interview method. The questions pertaining to socio-demographic information and knowledge, attitude and practice towards HIV were asked. After the health education the patients were followed up to assess the effect of health education. Only 43 HIV positive individuals were followed up, because the remaining was reluctant and non-cooperative for evaluation. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 [Table/Fig-1].

[Table/Fig-1]:

Socio-demographic characteristics of study population

Charac-teristics Male n=150 % Female n=60 % Total N=210 %
AGE (years)
< 20 4 2.7 1 1.7 5 2.4
21-30 77 51.3 23 38.3 100 47.6
31-40 35 23.3 34 56.7 69 32.8
41-50 20 13.3 2 3.3 22 10.5
>51 14 9.4 0 0 14 6.7
Religion
Hindus 145 96.7 59 98.3 204 97.1
Muslims 5 3.3 1 1.7 6 2.9
Christians 0 0 0 0 0 0
others 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marital status
Married 119 79.3 47 78.3 166 79
Un married 26 17.3 12 20 38 18.1
Widowed 5 3.4 1 1.7 6 2.9
Literacy status
Illiterate 52 34.7 13 21.7 65 30.9 X2=16.44, df=4, p=0.002 significant
Primary 35 23.3 7 11.7 42 20
Middle 24 16 24 40 48 22.8
H. School 26 17.3 12 20 38 18.1
College 13 8.7 4 6 17 8.1
Total 150 100 60 100 210 100

(X2=16.44,df=4,p=0.002 significant)

The study revealed that males constituted 71.4%of the total subjects which was higher than National figures, i.e. 61% [1]. But it is similar to the studies conducted by Kumar A [2] in Karnataka and Sharma R [3] (64%) in Ahemadabad.

In this study, 191 (90.9%) of the study subjects were aged between 21 and 50 y which is almost similar to National figures (88% in the age group 15-49 y) [1] and to the studies by Kumar A [2] and by Shrarma R [3].

The seropositivity was higher among the subjects with lower education (30.9%) These findings are similar to the study conducted by Sharma R [3]. (33.3%)

Among participants 166 (79%) were married. Similar observations were made by Kumar A [2] and Sharma R [3].

This study has revealed that 172 (82.2%) of the study subjects knew that sexual route as the mode of transmission, followed by blood and blood products i.e. 93 (44.2%) and perinatal transmission 43 (20.4%) [Table/Fig-2]. Regarding diseases prevention 39(18.6%) participants were aware of condom usage in disease prevention. But in the study conducted by Niraj K [4] about two thirds of the attendees were aware of condom use in disease prevention.

[Table/Fig-2]:

Knowledge Attitude and Practice regarding HIV

Charactristics N=210( %)
Knowledge Modes of transmission Sexual 172 (82.2)
Blood and Blood products 93 (44.2)
perinatal 43 (20.4)
n(%)
Modes of non transmission public toilets 122 (58.1)
Sharing clothes 107 (50.1)
Drinking dirty water 80 (38.1)
Sharing cups 79 (37.6)
Through foods 78 (37.1)
Through insect bite 72 (34.2)
Through kissing 56 (26.6)
n (%)
Disease dignosis Laboratory test available 117 (55.7)
Not curable 93 (44.3)
Vaccine not available 69 (32.8)
Affects children 16 (7.6)
HIV/AIDS different 16 (7.6)
Disease prevention Avoiding multiple sexual partner 141 (67.1)
Using disposable syringe & needle 42 (20.0)
Using condoms 39 (18.6)
n(%)
Attitude Live with the family 154 (73.3)
Share utensils 146 (69.5)
Blame Self 162 (77.1)
God 41 (19.5)
Others 7 (3.3)
n(%)
Practice Consider contraception 94 (44.7)
Demand disposable syringes 78 (37.1)
Continue safe sex practice with spouse 47 (22.3)
Continue extra-marital relationship 47 (22.3)

Regarding attitude of the patient towards disease, 154 (73.3%) of the study group wished to live with their family and 146(69.5%) want to share the utensils the same attitude has been also observed in the study conducted by Niraj K [4]. Three fourths (75.73%) of the participants had no objection in staying in same houses as the HIV infected persons, whereas only 33.4% of them said that they would share food with the HIV patients.

After giving health education only 43 HIV positive individuals were followed up, compared before and after giving health education and the difference was also noted. The difference was significance with respect to knowledge. The similar observations were also made in the study conducted by Niraj K [4], where awareness regarding condom was increased after the program intervention [Table/Fig-3].

[Table/Fig-3]:

Knowledge Attitude and Practice before and after Health Education.,

Charac-tristics Before Health Education After Health Educ-ation Differ-ence (%)
Knowledge* AIDS aware-ness AIDS known 38 (88.4) 40 (93.0) 4.6
AIDS dreadful 24 (55.8) 39 (90.7) 34.9
Occurs in India 27 (62.8) 36 (83.7) 20.9
Modes of transmission Sexual 34 (79.1) 38 (88.4) 9.3
Blood and Blood 18 (41.9) 34 (79.1) 37.2
products
Perinatal 7 (16.3) 24 (55.8) 39.5
Modes of non transmission Public toilets 12 (27.9) 28 (65.1) 37.2
Sharing clothes 17 (39.5) 32 (74.4) 34.9
Drinking dirty water 18 (41.9) 35 (81.4) 39.5
Sharing cups 22 (51.2) 37 (86.0) 34.9
Through foods 15 (34.9) 32 (74.4) 39.5
Through insect bite 27 (62.8) 32 (74.4) 11.6
Through kissing 17 (39.5) 37 (86.0) 46.5
Disease diagnosis Affects children 5 (11.6) 24 (55.8) 44.2
Laboratory test available 23 (53.5) 34 (79.1) 25.6
HIV/AIDS different 2 (4.7) 17 (39.5) 34.9
Not curable 23 (53.5) 36 (83.7) 30.2
Vaccine not available 15 (34.9) 27 (62.8) 27.9
Disease prevention By using condoms 8 (18.6) 32 (74.4) 55.8
By using disposable needles and syringes 9 (20.9) 27(62.8%) 41.9
By avoiding multiple sexual partners 28 (65.1) 35 (81.4) 16.3
Attitude** Live with the family 33 (76.7) 43 (100.0) 23.3
Share utensils 30 (69.7) 36 (83.7) 14
Practice*** Consider contraception 12 (27.9) 22 (51.1) 23.2
Demand disposable syringes 6 (13.9) 25 (58.1) 2.3
Continue safe sex practice with spouse 2 (4.6) 3 (6.9) 2.3
continue extramarital relationship 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0

*X2=35.75, DF=20, p=0.016

**Mc Nemar test for the attitude “live with the family” z2=8.1>x2=3.84, df=1, 0.05 , Mc Nemar test for the attitude “share utensils” z2=4.1>x22=3.84,df=1, 0.05

*** Mc Nemar test for “practice of considering contraception” Z2=8.1>X2=3.84, df=1, 0.05, Mc Nemar test for “demanding disposable syringe” Z2=17.05>X2=3.84, df=1, 0.05

Conclusion

Our study revealed that the study participants have satisfactory knowledge regarding spread, mode of transmission and prevention of HIV/AIDS. This knowledge was improved after providing the counselling. Most of the participants have showed positive attitude towards the diseases and like to stay with family and willing to practice safe sex by using condom and prevent the transmission by using disposable syringes. Counselling and health education play key role in improving this.

Financial or Other Competing Interests

None.

References

  • [1]. NACO: Operational Guidelines for Integrated Counseling and Testing Centers: National AIDS Control Organization Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kumar A, Kumar P, Gupta M, Kamath A, Maheshwari A, Singh S. Profile of Clients Tested HIV positive in a Voluntary Counseling and Testing Center of a District hospital, Udupi, South Kannada. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2008;33(3):156–59. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.42051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • [3].Sharma R. Profile of attendee for voluntary counseling and testing in the ICTC at Kesar SAL Medical College, Ahmedabad. Indian J sex trans & AIDS. 2009;30:31–36. doi: 10.4103/2589-0557.55479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Niraj K. Biswas, et al. Profile of the Patients Who Attended the HIV Integrated Counseling and Testing Centre. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012;6(2):195–97. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR are provided here courtesy of JCDR Research & Publications Private Limited

RESOURCES