Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 4;102(0 2):262–274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.053

Table 7.

Mediation Analyses of Scaled RT on Distractor-Present Trials

PE SE Lower CI Upper CI
Event-related Activation as mediator
Model 1: Age → Left MFG → Scaled RT −0.009 0.009 −0.031 0.005
Model 2: Age → Right MFG → Scaled RT −0.010 0.008 −0.033 0.001
Model 3: Age → Left FEF → Scaled RT −0.008 0.008 −0.032 0.002

Age as mediator
Model 4: Left MFG → Age → Scaled RT 0.031 0.011 0.014 0.054*
Model 5: Right MFG → Age → Scaled RT 0.028 0.008 0.016 0.047*
Model 6: Left FEF → Age → Scaled RT 0.041 0.015 0.015 0.073*

Note. n = 21 younger adults and 20 older adults, following removal of one outlier (see Results). For each regression model, the outcome variable was scaled reaction time for distractor-present trials. Potential mediator variable listed in bold font. PE = point estimate of regression coefficient for the mediator variable, defined as the mean of the estimated regression coefficients for the indirect (mediating) effect, across 20,000 bootstrap samples; SE = bootstrap derived estimate of the standard error of the indirect effect point estimate. Lower CI / Upper CI = lower / upper bounds of 95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence interval for indirect effect. MFG = middle frontal gyrus; FEF = frontal eye field.

*

p < .05 for regression coefficient of mediator variable, as defined by 95% confidence interval that does not include 0.