Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2014 Jul 30;2(6):676–681. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.150

Changes in nutritional composition, functional, and sensory properties of yam flour as a result of presoaking

Adewale Olusegun Obadina 1,, Bukunola Olaide Babatunde 1, Ifeoluwa Olotu 1
PMCID: PMC4256572  PMID: 25493185

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of soaking pretreatments on some of the properties of flour obtained from two varieties of yam namely;Dioscorea alata andDioscorea rotundata with a view of providing information that will enhance their end use. The yam varieties were washed, chipped, parboiled at 50°C, soaked for different periods (0, 6, 12, and 18 h), dried at 60°C, and milled into flour. The flour samples were analyzed for their nutritional composition, pH, color, and functional properties. The flour samples were also made into pastes and were sensorially analyzed and 0 h soaked samples were used as control. The protein content of 18 h-soakedD. rotundata andD. alata flour samples was significantly different from the control and soaking had no effect (P > 0.05) on the fat and ash content but the carbohydrate content of the flour samples ranged from 83.08% to 86.13%. The 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample had the lowest peak viscosity, breakdown value, and final viscosity among theD. rotundata variety samples. Pasting temperature ranged from 79.80 to 83.60°C and 6-h soakedD. alata flour sample had the lowest water absorption capacity and the highest bulk density. On the basis of sensory analysis, the panelist preferred the taste, texture, color, and appearance of paste made from the 18-h soakedD. rotundata flour to the paste of other flour samples. The results of this study show that D.rotundata should be soaked for 18 h prior to drying and milling in order to obtain a good-quality flour and paste.

Keywords: D. alata, D. rotundata, nutritional composition, paste, soaking, yam flour

Introduction

The genusDioscorea (familyDioscoreaceae) consists of some species that are commonly known as yam which are consumed perennial in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Oceania (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yam_%28vegetable%29). Throughout the world, over 150 species are grown (Purseglove 1991) and about six species are known as important staples in the tropics.D. rotundata (white yam),D. esculenta (Chinese yam),D. alata (water yam),D. bulbifera (aerial yam), andD. dumenterum (trifoliate yam) are among the economically important species (Ike and Inoni 2006). Yam serves as an important source of carbohydrate and serves as a major source of income in countries where they are cultivated. In 2007, 96% of the worldwide production of yam (52 million tons) was from Africa while 94% of the yam was from West Africa with Nigeria alone producing 71% (http://www.iita.org/yam). Yams are usually processed into dry-yam tubers/slices and flour in West African countries such as Ghana, Benin, and Nigeria (Bricas et al. 1997). Yam tubers are usually processed into flour called “gbodo” in Yoruba land of Nigeria by peeling, slicing, parboiling in hot water (40–60°C for 1–3 h), soaking, and sun drying (Onayemi and Potter 1974).

Majority of foods sold in the market presently are exposed to a certain degree of processing (Akingbala et al. 1995) and processing is also prerequisite for yam consumption. Gbodo—traditionally processed dry yam—gives an intermediate flour product upon milling which is called “elubo.” Elubo is usually stirred in boiling water to obtain a paste which is usually eaten with soups called “amala” (Akissoe et al. 2000). The quality attributes that consumers look out for in these products are their color, texture, and taste (Akissoe et al. 2000). Yam is still being processed to gbodo and elubo through traditional methods and their quality attributes differ from one processor/location to another (Hounhouigan et al. 2003). However, to the best knowledge, little information is available on how soaking as a processing variable affects the quality attributes of yam flour and this type of knowledge becomes important when the development of flour is considered. This study investigated the effect of different soaking time on the chemical composition, functional, and sensory properties of flour fromD. rotundata andD. alata.

Materials and Methods

Yam was obtained from Kuto market in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. The two varieties of yam (D. alata andD. rotundata) were converted to chips using the method described by Ige and Akintunde (1981). The white and water yam tubers were washed with portable water. The yam was cut into chips (150 g) and parboiled at a temperature of 50°C. The parboiled samples were soaked in portable water at different times (0, 6, 12, and 18 h) 0 h-soaked samples of the two yam varieties were used as control. The soaked yam slices were dried to a constant weight using a cabinet drier (Jinan Food Machinery Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) at 60°C for 2 h. The dried yam chips were milled into flour, sieved using 0.25 μm sieve, and were subjected to analyses.

Nutritional composition analysis

The nutritional composition of yam flour, including protein and fat, fiber, ash, and carbohydrate was determined according to the methods of AOAC (2000).

Functional properties analysis

Bulk density

The bulk density of the yam flour was determined with the method of Wang and Kinsella (1976).

Water absorption capacity

The water absorption capacities of the flour samples were carried out by the modified method of Prinyawiwatkul et al. (1997).

Dispersibility

A method described by Kulkarni and Ingle (1991) was used to measure dispersibility.

Pasting property

The pasting properties of the samples were measured using a Rapid Visco Analyzer, RVA (Model RVA-SUPER3; Newport Scientific 1998, Australia) of the yam flour.

pH

The pH of the sample was measured with a pH meter.

Color intensity

One gram of each sample was weighed into a 100 ml beaker. 25 ml Hcl was measured and added to the beaker to extract the color by shaking and homogenizing with glass rod for 30 min. The mixture was allowed to stand for 10 min after which it was filtered through hardened Whatman No 42 filter paper into another 100 ml conical flask. The organic filtrate obtained was used to determine color by taking the absorbance at wavelength of 520 nm on a spectrophotometer (Cecil 2483, Cambridge, UK).

Sensory analysis

The yam flour samples were prepared by stirring them in hot water to make amala paste and served to 20 taste panelists who are regular consumers of amala. The pastes were rated for aroma, texture, color, and taste using a 9-point hedonic scale according to Iwe (2002).

Statistical analysis

All analyses were carried out in triplicates and the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). SAS version 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for windows was the statistical software that was used.

Results

Table1 shows the nutritional composition of the flour samples as affected by soaking. The protein content of the 6 h-soakedD. rotundata andD. alata flour samples was lower than that of the control and this reduction was significant while the reduction inD. alata was insignificant. The protein content of 18 h-soakedD. alata flour sample was insignificantly different from the control. There was no significant difference in the moisture content of the 6- and 12 h-soakedD. rotundata flour samples but the moisture content of the 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample was significant compared to the control. The highest moisture content (10.12%) was observed in 6 h-soakedD. alata flour sample while the 12 h-soakedD. alata had the lowest moisture content (8.16%). Table1 also reveals that there were no significant differences in the ash and fat contents of all the samples but their carbohydrate content ranged from 83.08% to 86.13%.

Table 1.

Effect of soaking time on the proximate composition of yam flour in percentage.

Sample Moisture % Protein % Fat % CHO % Fiber % Ash %
Dioscorea rotundata 0 h 9.47 ± 0.12b 1.51 ± 0.01b 1.77 ± 0.20a 83.96 ± 0.78cb 1.93 ± 0.21abc 1.67 ± 1.15a
Dioscorea alata 0 h 9.97 ± 0.15a 0.91 ± 0.01a 1.89 ± 0.51a 83.61 ± 1.20cb 1.62 ± 0.39abc 2.00 ± 1.00a
D. rotundata 6 h 8.60 ± 0.78c 1.21 ± 0.26a 2.00 ± 0.34a 83.75 ± 1.13cb 2.14 ± 0.39ab 2.00 ± 0.00a
D. alata 6 h 10.12 ± 0.07a 0.88 ± 0.57a 2.00 ± 0.34a 83.08 ± 0.59c 2.26 ± 0.14ab 1.67 ± 0.58a
D. rotundata 12 h 8.41 ± 0.13c 1.16 ± 0.25a 1.11 ± 0.51a 85.97 ± 1.11a 1.35 ± 0.57aa 2.00 ± 0.00a
D. alata 12 h 8.16 ± 0.04c 1.10 ± 0.23a 1.44 ± 0.51a 86.13 ± 1.30a 1.17 ± 0.16d 2.00 ± 1.00a
D. rotundata 18 h 9.38 ± 0.05b 1.09 ± 0.01a 1.44 ± 0.51a 85.31 ± 0.74ba 1.43 ± 0.53cd 1.33 ± 0.58a
D. alata 18 h 9.30 ± 0.05b 0.94 ± 0.02a 2.22 ± 0.19a 83.18 ± 1.16c 2.36 ± 0.02a 2.00 ± 1.00a

Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); values within the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

D. alata which was used as the control had the highest dispersibility and its dispersibility was not significantly different from that of the 12 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample as shown in Table2. The bulk density of the 18 h-soaked yam flour was significantly different from other samples with lesser soaking time.D. rotundata flour sample (18 h soaked) had the highest while 6 h-soakedD. alata flour sample had the lowest water absorption capacity and its value was not significantly different fromD. alata that was used as control.

Table 2.

Effect of soaking time on the functional properties of yam flour.

Samples Dispersibility % Bulk density g/mL Water abs g/mL
Dioscorea rotundata 0 h 67.33 ± 0.58b 0.76 ± 0.02a 2.45 ± 0.01g
Dioscorea alata 0 h 68.83 ± 1.15a 0.75 ± 0.02a 2.50 ± 0.02f
D. rotundata 6 h 65.83 ± 0.29c 0.77 ± 0.01a 2.62 ± 0.01e
D. alata 6 h 67.67 ± 0.58b 0.78 ± 0.01a 2.45 ± 0.01g
D. rotundata 12 h 68.33 ± 0.58ba 0.74 ± 0.01a 2.86 ± 0.01b
D. alata 12 h 67.50 ± 0.50b 0.75 ± 0.01a 2.76 ± 0.03c
D. rotundata 18 h 64.83 ± 0.29c 0.66 ± 0.00b 2.91 ± 0.02a
D. alata 18 h 61.83 ± 0.29d 0.65 ± 0.02b 2.71 ± 0.03d

Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); values within the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

There was no difference (P > 0.05) in the color of all the yam flour samples at different soaking times as shown in Table3. Also the pH of the yam flour samples were different (P < 0.05) during the different soaking periods.

Table 3.

Effect of soaking time on the pH and color of yam flour.

Sample pH Color
Dioscorea rotundata 0 h 6.40 ± 0.01a 1.81 ± 0.08a
Dioscorea alata 0 h 6.40 ± 0.01a 1.82 ± 0.07a
D. rotundata 6 h 5.82 ± 0.02c 1.82 ± 0.06a
D. alata 6 h 6.21 ± 0.01b 1.83 ± 0.06a
D. rotundata 12 h 5.54 ± 0.01d 1.81 ± 0.07a
D. alata 12 h 5.48 ± 0.02e 1.86 ± 0.03a
D. rotundata 18 h 5.10 ± 0.01f 1.85 ± 0.04a
D. alata 18 h 5.84 ± 0.02c 1.82 ± 0.08a

Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); values within the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

The lowest breakdown, final, and peak viscosity were observed in the 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample (Table4). Pasting temperature ranged from 79.80 to 83.60°C. Flour samples made fromD. rotundata soaked for 12 h had the highest peak viscosity followed by samples ofD. rotundata soaked for 6 h and the control.D. rotundata soaked for 18 h flour sample had higher holding strength (471.50 RVU) compared to other samples The values of the breakdown for flour fromD. alata variety samples were lower than that of the flour fromD. rotundata cultivar except forD. alata soaked at 18 h. The final viscosities of the D.rotundata samples at different soaking times were not significantly different from each other. Setback values which are an index of retrogradation varied from 93.00 to 488.50 RVU.

Table 4.

Effect of soaking time on the pasting properties of yam flour.

Sample Peak viscosity (RVU) Holding strength (RVU) Breakdown (RVU) Final viscosity (RVU) Setback (RVU) Peak time (Min) Pasting temperature (°C)
Dioscorea rotundata 0 h 622.50 ± 487.20a 289.00 ± 752.36c 332.50 ± 265.17a 778.50 ± 785.60ab 488.50 ± 33.23a 4.70 ± 0.24c 79.80 ± 0.00a
Dioscorea alata 0 h 349.00 ± 46.67d 280.00 ± 49.50c 69.00 ± 2.83f 374.00 ± 9.90d 93.00 ± 59.40d 4.87 ± 0.09bc 81.93 ± 0.60ab
D. rotundata 6 h 594.501 ± 18.09a 405.00 ± 343.65ab 188.50 ± 225.57b 787.50 ± 137.89ab 381.50 ± 205.77b 5.03 ± 0.05b 80.68 ± 0.04 cd
D. alata 6 h 454.25 ± 10.61c 334.00 ± 18.38bc 119.50 ± 7.78d 502.00 ± 7.07c 168.00 ± 11.31bc 4.83 ± 0.05bc 81.08 ± 0.67bc
D. rotundata 12 h 607.40 ± 364.87a 454.50 ± 550.84a 153.50 ± 185.97c 821.50 ± 245.37a 367.00 ± 305.47b 5.43 ± 0.14a 81.95 ± 0.57ab
D. alata 12 h 438.70 ± 26.16c 334.50 ± 30.41bc 104.00 ± 4.24d 493.00 ± 35.36c 159.50 ± 4.95c 5.43 ± 0.05a 82.35 ± 0.00a
D. rotundata 18 h 515.90 ± 9.90b 471.50 ± 33.23a 44.50 ± 43.13ef 723.00 ± 111.72ab 252.50 ± 144.96b 5.47 ± 0.09a 82.30 ± 0.00a
D. alata 18 h 439.90 ± 42.43c 352.00 ± 38.18bc 87.00 ± 4.24e 546.50 ± 51.62a 194.50 ± 13.44c 5.40 ± 0.00a 83.60 ± 0.49b

Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); values within the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Table5 shows that there were significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in the appearance, texture, taste, aroma, and the overall acceptability of the yam paste made from different flour samples. The color, taste, appearance, aroma, and the overall acceptability of the paste made from flour produced from the control sample ofD. rotundata were significantly different from the appearance, color, taste, aroma, and the overall acceptability of paste made from 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour. After the 18 h soaking period, the overall acceptability, taste, texture color, and appearance ofD. alata were significantly different fromD. rotundata at the same soaking time.

Table 5.

Effect of soaking time on the sensory attributes of yam flour.

Sample Appearance Color Texture Taste Aroma Overall acceptability
Dioscorea rotundata 0 h 5.30 ± 2.60c 4.95 ± 2.24c 6.60 ± 1.93d 5.45 ± 2.28abc 4.65 ± 2.46ab 5.45 ± 2.61c
Dioscorea alata 0 h 5.90 ± 2.90ab 6.15 ± 2.37cb 3.40 ± 1.98a 4.40 ± 2.64c 4.10 ± 2.29b 5.30 ± 2.49c
D. rotundata 6 h 6.95 ± 1.43bc 6.50 ± 1.91b 6.95 ± 1.79d 6.25 ± 2.22ba 5.80 ± 2.26a 6.90 ± 1.92ab
D. alata 6 h 5.95 ± 2.16cb 6.00 ± 1.86cb 6.00 ± 2.20cd 5.70 ± 1.56abc 5.80 ± 2.04a 6.00 ± 1.84abc
D. rotundata 12 h 6.00 ± 1.52cb 6.10 ± 1.71cb 5.75 ± 2.36cd 5.35 ± 2.58abc 6.15 ± 2.13a 6.40 ± 1.79abc
D. alata 12 h 4.75 ± 2.24c 5.10 ± 2.15c 4.20 ± 2.38ab 4.35 ± 1.81c 4.90 ± 2.07ab 5.45 ± 1.64c
D. rotundata 18 h 7.55 ± 1.50a 7.85 ± 1.23a 6.85 ± 1.73d 6.45 ± 2.04a 6.15 ± 2.13a 7.20 ± 1.47a
D. alata 18 h 5.25 ± 2.05c 5.65 ± 1.50cb 4.90 ± 2.31bc 4.85 ± 2.37bc 5.75 ± 2.36a 5.60 ± 2.11bc

Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); values within the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Discussion

The variations in the protein content of the two yam varieties may be due to genetic composition of the varieties and environmental conditions (Woolfe 1987). The reduced protein content might be because of the progressive solubilization and movement of some nitrogenous substances into water used for soaking (Ukachukwu and Obioha 2000). All the samples had moisture content below 13% which is the standard for dry food samples as described by (Prinyawiwatkul et al. 1997), the result of the moisture content are similar to the previous reports of Jimoh and Olatidoye (2009). The insignificant differences obtained in the crude fat and ash values of the samples conform with the studies of Adejumo et al. (2013), who found that soaking had no significant effect on the fat and ash values of yam flour.

The dispersibility of a mixture in water indicates its ability to reconstitute, the higher the dispersibility of a mixture, the better is its reconstitution property (Ghavidel and Davood 2011), thus the result of this study shows that the 12 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample will reconstitute better than others. The bulk density of the 18 h-soakedD. rotundata andD. alata flour samples was significantly different from other samples with lesser soaking time and this may be due to the starch particles becoming looser during this soaking period. It has been reported that bulk density reduces as soaking time increases.D. rotundata that was soaked for 18 h before being processed into flour had the highest water-holding capacity whileD. alata soaked at 6 h had the lowest capacity, the water-holding capacity is also a function of the protein content of the yam flour (Kinsella 1976).

The insignificant difference observed in the color of all the yam flour samples might have been as a result of the uniformity in soaking temperature (50°C). Also the increase in soaking time might have caused a decrease in pH as a result of the actions of microorganisms which could have induced acidity.

The peak viscosity of all theD. alata samples were low compared to all theD. rotundata samples and this indicates that the carbohydrate components ofD. rotundata flour samples will not breakdown easily and quickly like theD. alata samples until it is cooked properly. Peak viscosity has been reported to be an important parameter to processors so as to obtain a useable starch paste (Adeyemi 1989). The 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample had the highest holding strength, holding strength indicates the capacity of a flour sample undergoing processing to resist shear stress and heating. The vulnerability of cooked starch granules to disintegrate into smaller components is measured as breakdown and this has been reported to affect the steadiness of flour products (Beta et al. 2001). Low breakdown value indicates that the stability of a flour sample is high under hot condition, therefore, the stability of 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour sample will be higher under hot condition. Also, all the flour samples fromD. rotundata can form thick and strong gel after cooking and cooling than samples fromD. alata based on the observed insignificant differences in their final viscosity.

On the basis of the sensory analysis, the panelist preferred the taste, texture, color, and appearance of paste made from the 18 h-soakedD. rotundata flour to the paste made from other flour samples including the control sample. The soaking period might have influenced the color, texture, and appearance ofD. rotundata as well as its acceptability. The result of some of its functional properties also showed that paste from 18 h soakedD. rotundata will have desirable sensory qualities.

Conclusions

SoakingD. rotundata for 18 h before processing it into flour led to the retention of the nutrients of the yam flour except protein and improved the color, texture, and appearance of the paste that was developed from this flour. Also, a viscous and firm gel that will be stable at high temperature as well as a useable and acceptable starch paste with superior eating quality can be obtained by soakingD. rotundata for 18 h prior to processing.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. Adejumo BA, Okundare RO, Afolayan OI. Balogun SA. Quality attributes of yam flour (Elubo) as affected by blanching water temperature and soaking time. Int. J. Sci. Eng. 2013;2:216–221. and. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adeyemi IA. First Meeting of the Action Committee on Raw Materials Research and Development Council. Lagos, Nigeria: Raw Material and Development Council; 1989. Cereals as food and industrial raw materials; pp. 131–138. . November 3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akingbala JO, Oguntimehin TB. Sobande AO. Physicochemical properties and acceptability of yam flour substituted with soy flour. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 1995;48:73–80. doi: 10.1007/BF01089202. and. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akissoe NH, Hounhouigan JG, Bricas N, Vernier P, Nago MC. Olorunda OA. Physical, chemical and sensory evaluation of dried yam (D. rotundata) tubers, flour and amala-A flour-derived product. Trop. Sci. 2000;41:151–156. and. [Google Scholar]
  5. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemistry; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. Beta T, Harold C, Lioyd WR. John RNT. Starch properties as affected by sorghum grain chemistry. J. Food Sci. Agric. 2001;81:245–251. and. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bricas N, Vernier P, Ategbo E, Hounhouigan J, Mitchikpe E, N'kpenu KE, et al. Le development de la filiere cossettes d'igname en Afrique de l'Quest. Cahiers de la recherché Dev. 1997;44:100–114. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghavidel RA. Davood MG. Processing and assessment of quality characteristics of composite baby foods. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2011;1:11–28. and. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hounhouigan DJ, Kayode AP. Nago CM. Desirable culinary and sensory characteristics of yams in urban Benin. Benin J. Agric. Sci. 2003;21:2815–2820. and. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ige MT. Akintunde FO. Studies on the local technique of yam flour production. J. Food Technol. 1981;16:303–311. and. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ike PC. Inoni OD. Determinants of yam production and economic efficiency among small-holder farmers in southeastern Nigeria. Central Eur. J. Agric. 2006;7:337–342. and. [Google Scholar]
  12. Iwe MO. Handbook of sensory methods and analysis. Enugu, Nigeria: Rojoint Communications. Services Limited; 2002. p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jimoh KO. Olatidoye OP. Evaluation of physico-chemical and rheological characteristics of soybeans fortified with yam flour. J. Appl. Biosci. 2009;13:703–706. and. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kinsella JE. Functional properties of proteins in foods: a survey. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 1976;1:219–280. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kulkarni DN. Ingle UM. Sorghum malt based weaning food formulations: preparation, functional properties, and nutritive value. J. Food Nutr. 1991;13:322–323. and. [Google Scholar]
  16. Newport Scientific. Applications manual for the rapid viscotm analyzer using thermocline for windows. Australia: Newport Scientific Limited; 1998. pp. 2–26. [Google Scholar]
  17. Onayemi O. Potter NN. Preparation and storage properties of drum dried white yam (D. rotundata Poir) flakes. J. Food Sci. 1974;39:559–562. and. [Google Scholar]
  18. Prinyawiwatkul W, Beuchat LR, Mc Watters KH. Phillips RD. Functional properties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) flour as affected by soaking, boiling, and fungal fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997;45:480–486. and. [Google Scholar]
  19. Purseglove JW. Tropical crops: dicotyledons. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1991. pp. 109–111. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ukachukwu SN. Obioha FC. Effect of time duration of thermal treatments on the nutritive value ofMucuna cochinchinensis. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2000;9:11–15. and. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang JC. Kinsella JE. Functional properties of Novel proteins; alfalfa leaf protein. J. Food Sci. 1976;41:286–289. and. [Google Scholar]
  22. Woolfe JA. The potato in human diet. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yam. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yam_%28vegetable%29. (accessed 20 June 2014)
  24. Yam production. Available at http://www.iita.org/yam. (accessed 20 June 2014)

Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES