Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2014 Sep 10;70(Pt 10):178–182. doi: 10.1107/S1600536814019151

Crystal structures of isotypic poly[bis­(benz­imid­azolium) [tetra-μ-iodido-stannate(II)]] and poly[bis­(5,6-di­fluoro­benzimidazolium) [tetra-μ-iodido-stannate(II)]]

Iwan Zimmermann a, Tony D Keene a, Jürg Hauser a, Silvio Decurtins a, Shi-Xia Liu a,*
PMCID: PMC4257208  PMID: 25484646

The bicyclic aromatic benzimidazolium cation stabilizes the layered perovskite structure comprising inorganic {[SnI4]2−}n sheets. A di­fluoro-substitution of the organic cation demonstrates the structural versatility of the new approach.

Keywords: crystal structure, benzimidazolium, tin(II) iodide layers, perovskite layer

Abstract

The isostructural title compounds, {(C7H7N2)2[SnI4]}n, (1), and {(C7H5F2N2)2[SnI4]}n, (2), show a layered perovskite-type structure composed of anionic {[SnI4]2−}n sheets parallel to (100), which are decorated on both sides with templating benzimidazolium or 5,6-di­fluoro­benzimidazolium cations, respectively. These planar organic heterocycles mainly form N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds to the terminal I atoms of the corner-sharing [SnI6] octa­hedra (point group symmetry 2) from the inorganic layer, but not to the bridging ones. This is in contrast to most of the reported structures of related compounds where ammonium cations are involved. Here hydrogen bonding to both types of iodine atoms and thereby a distortion of the inorganic layers to various extents is observed. For (1) and (2), all Sn—I—Sn angles are linear and no out-of-plane distortions of the inorganic layers occur, a fact of relevance in view of the material properties. The arrangement of the aromatic cations is mainly determined through the direction of the N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds. The coherence between organic bilayers along [100] is mainly achieved through van der Waals inter­actions.

Chemical context  

The title compounds, (1) and (2), belong to an extensive family of materials exhibiting a perovskite-type structure, which can vary with respect to the dimensionality of its extended inorganic framework, ranging from two-dimensional, [MX 4]n 2n, to three-dimensional, [MX 3]nn (Mitzi, 1999, 2001, 2004; Mitzi et al., 2001; Zhengtao et al., 2003a,b ). The former case is exemplified by anionic [MX 4]n 2n sheets (M = divalent metal ion; X = halogen) of corner-sharing MX 6 octa­hedra, which are separated by bilayers of organic cations.graphic file with name e-70-00178-scheme1.jpg

For most reported layered perovskites, these organic mol­ecules are terminated with one or two protonated primary amine groups. Thereby, the ammonium head(s) form N—H⋯X hydrogen bonds to any of the bridging and terminal halogen atoms in the inorganic layers (Mitzi et al., 2002; Mercier et al., 2004; Sourisseau et al., 2007; Pradeesh et al., 2013). In the actual case, however, as a novel aspect, the bicyclic aromatic benzimidazole unit is introduced as an organic part. There are numerous general examples of benzimidazole acting as a neutral ligand (Keene et al., 2010) and similarly in its protonated form (Mouchaham et al., 2010). In this context, the present study explicitly demonstrates that benzimidazolium cations and corresponding derivatives can stabilize the layered perovskite structure as well, while fitting perfectly into the ‘footprint’ provided by the inorganic framework. This observation bears importance since the extent of the in- and out-of-plane angular distortions, twisting and buckling of the anionic sheets, is largely determined by the relative charge density, steric requirements and hydrogen-bonding pattern of the organic cations (Knutson & Martin, 2005; Takahashi et al., 2007). These distortions correlate with the band gaps of the perovskite-type semiconductors. It is inter­esting to note that perovskite-based solar cells have recently been catapulted to the cutting edge of thin-film photovoltaic research (Hao et al., 2014; Marchioro et al., 2014). Consequently, the chemical variability which comes with the imidazolium cation, especially the range of possible substitutions on its mol­ecular skeleton, gives an additional structural diversity to this class of compounds. As a case in point, consider the di­fluoro-substituted compound (2) which renders not only modified van der Waals inter­actions for the organic bilayers, but also tailors the ‘chemistry’ of the crystal surfaces.

Structural commentary  

Compounds (1) and (2) are isostructural. Their asymmetric units, Figs. 1 and 2, consist of an Sn2+ cation situated on a twofold rotation axis (Wyckoff position 4e), three iodine atoms [one in a general position, one on an inversion centre (4a) and one on a twofold rotation axis (4e)] and a benz­imid­azolium or 5,6-di­fluoro­benzimidazolium cation, respectively. The main building blocks of the structure are corner-sharing [SnI6] octa­hedra, which form planar sheets with formula {[SnI4]2−}n which extend parallel to (100). The negative charge of these layers is compensated by the organic cations, which are on both sides of the layer, attached by strong hydrogen-bonding and Coulombic inter­actions (Figs. 3 and 4). This structural motif can be regarded as an A–B–A layer system, where A represents the aromatic cation and B the tin iodide layer. The coherence between organic bilayers along [100] is mainly achieved through van der Waals inter­actions. The Sn—I bond lengths for (1) range from 3.0626 (3) Å to 3.1607 (3) Å [(2): 3.0491 (5) Å to 3.1596 (3) Å], with no distinct pattern for bridging compared to terminal iodine atoms (Tables 1 and 2). These values are in agreement with those reported previously for related tin iodide perovskite structures, as for example [(C4H9NH3)2[SnI4]], where the bond lengths range from 3.133 Å to 3.16 Å (Mitzi, 1996). The I—Sn—I angles of the [SnI6] octa­hedra in the title structures deviate slightly from the ideal octa­hedral geometry. With 83.886 (4)° for (1) [(2): 84.077 (6)°], the I2—Sn1—I3 angle has the largest difference. On the other hand, all Sn—I—Sn angles are linear, which leads to the formation of an almost rectangular grid (Fig. 5). There is no out-of-plane distortion of the inorganic sheet. The arrangement of the aromatic cations is mainly determined through the direction of N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds to the apical iodine atoms (Tables 3 and 4; Figs. 3 and 4). There is no N—H⋯Ibridging contact smaller than the sum of the respective van der Waals radii (H: 1.2, I: 1.98 Å; Bondi, 1964). This is in contrast to primary ammonium cations, which form hydrogen bonds to both apical and bridging iodine atoms. The shortest H⋯Ibridging distance is C3—H3⋯I2 with 3.12 Å for (1) [(2): 3.19 Å] close to the sum of van der Waals radii. Adjacent cations within an organic layer show a plane-to-plane distance of 3.786 Å for (1) [(2): 3.730 Å] (Fig. 6). The shortest contact distances between the organic bilayers for both compounds are close to the sums of the van der Waals radii [C8⋯H6i 2.801 Å in (1) and F8⋯H9ii 2.557 Å in (2); (i): Inline graphic − x, −Inline graphic + y, Inline graphic − z; (ii): Inline graphic − x, Inline graphic − y, −z]. The larger size of the fluorine atom in comparison to the hydrogen atom is reflected in a larger A–B–A layer spacing of 14.407 Å for (2) compared to 13.950 Å for (1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The main building units of (1), showing atom labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, y + 1, z; (ii) −x, y, −z + Inline graphic.]

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The main building units of (2), showing atom labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, y + 1, z; (ii) −x, y, −z + Inline graphic.]

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The crystal packing of compound (1) viewed along [010]. N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The crystal packing of compound (2) viewed along [010]. N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for (1) .

Sn1—I1 3.1571 (2) Sn1—I3 3.1607 (3)
Sn1—I2 3.1242 (1) Sn1—I3i 3.0626 (3)
       
I1—Sn1—I2 89.357 (3) I2—Sn1—I3 83.886 (4)
I1—Sn1—I2ii 90.984 (3) I1—Sn1—I3i 88.396 (4)
I1—Sn1—I1ii 176.793 (9) I2—Sn1—I3i 96.114 (4)
I2—Sn1—I2ii 167.773 (7) I3—Sn1—I3i 180.0
I1—Sn1—I3 91.604 (4)    

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for (2) .

Sn1—I1 3.1596 (3) Sn1—I3 3.1310 (5)
Sn1—I2 3.1129 (1) Sn1—I3i 3.0491 (5)
       
I1—Sn1—I2 89.374 (6) I2—Sn1—I3 84.077 (6)
I1—Sn1—I2ii 90.984 (6) I1—Sn1—I3i 88.269 (7)
I1—Sn1—I1ii 176.539 (14) I2—Sn1—I3i 95.923 (6)
I2—Sn1—I2ii 168.154 (12) I3—Sn1—I3i 180.0
I1—Sn1—I3 91.731 (7)    

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

View along the a* axis of a tin iodide layer of (2). For clarity, the atoms are represented as spheres with uniform sizes selected for each atom type.

Table 3. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (1) .

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯I1iii 0.81 (3) 2.85 (3) 3.615 (2) 158 (3)
N4—H4⋯I1i 0.85 (3) 2.86 (3) 3.630 (2) 151 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Table 4. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (2) .

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯I1iii 0.95 (6) 2.79 (6) 3.610 (4) 145 (4)
N4—H4⋯I1i 0.75 (5) 2.88 (6) 3.587 (4) 157 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

View along the a* axis of a double layer of tin iodide and the organic cations of (2). For clarity, the [SnI6] octa­hedra are shown as polyhedra, the atoms of the organic cations are represented as spheres with uniform sizes selected for each atom type.

Database survey  

In the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.35, last update November 2013; Allen, 2002) no structures of compounds containing a (benz)imidazolium cation for layered perovskites are listed, making the two examples presented herein the only ones reported so far.

Synthesis and crystallization  

Compound (1) was synthesized and crystallized by a solvothermal method using a mixture of tin(II) iodide and benz­imidazole in a 1:2 molar ratio. In a 50 ml round-bottom flask, 4 ml concentrated HI (57 wt. %, stabilized with hypo­phospho­rous acid) was mixed with 2 mmol (0.236 g) benz­imidazole. After stirring for one minute, this solution was added to a sample flask containing 1 mmol (0.372 g) tin(II) iodide. The reaction flask was put in a 23 ml Teflon container. The reaction was conducted at 363 K for ten h after which the autoclave was slowly cooled (1 K/h) to room temperature. Thin, black plate-like crystals were obtained. The synthetic procedure for (2) was identical to that for (1), only using 0.5 mmol (0.77 g) 5,6-di­fluoro­benzimidazole and 0.25 mmol (0.093 g) tin(II) iodide as starting materials. Thin, black plate-like crystals were obtained.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 5. The N-H hydrogen atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and were freely refined. The C-bound hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding atoms with C—H = 0.95 Å. The isotropic displacement parameters of all H atoms were constrained to 1.2U eq of their parent atoms. The crystal of compound (2) was a non-merohedral twin. The two twin components were related by a twofold rotation about the c* axis. The data from both twin components were integrated to give 8236 and 7625 non-overlapped reflections for twin components 1 and 2, respectively, plus 13836 overlapping reflections from both twin components. Symmetry-equivalent reflections were merged. The major twin fraction, component 1, refined to 0.6870 (12).

Table 5. Experimental details.

  (1) (2)
Crystal data
Chemical formula (C7H7N2)2[SnI4] (C7H5F2N2)2[SnI4]
M r 864.58 936.55
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 123 123
a, b, c (Å) 29.6316 (5), 6.22328 (10), 12.4258 (2) 31.3825 (6), 6.18011 (12), 12.38507 (13)
β (°) 109.6798 (8) 109.3241 (7)
V3) 2157.55 (6) 2266.72 (7)
Z 4 4
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 6.91 6.61
Crystal size (mm) 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.05 0.33 × 0.33 × 0.01
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) Multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2001)
T min, T max 0.570, 0.747 0.322, 0.522
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 24695, 3713, 3222 29697, 5792, 5179
R int 0.033 ?
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.772 0.768
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.022, 0.045, 1.06 0.035, 0.124, 1.07
No. of reflections 3713 5792
No. of parameters 113 132
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.70, −1.15 1.95, −1.74

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2001), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2011) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) 1, 2. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814019151/wm5043sup1.cif

e-70-00178-sup1.cif (1MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 1. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814019151/wm50431sup2.hkl

e-70-00178-1sup2.hkl (203.9KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 2. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814019151/wm50432sup3.hkl

e-70-00178-2sup3.hkl (317.6KB, hkl)

CCDC references: 1021082, 1021083

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant No. 200021–147143).

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

(C7H5F2N2)2[SnI4] F(000) = 1680
Mr = 936.55 Dx = 2.744 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 31.3825 (6) Å Cell parameters from 9949 reflections
b = 6.18011 (12) Å θ = 5.5–65.4°
c = 12.38507 (13) Å µ = 6.61 mm1
β = 109.3241 (7)° T = 123 K
V = 2266.72 (7) Å3 Plate, black
Z = 4 0.33 × 0.33 × 0.01 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 5792 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 5179 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator θmax = 33.1°, θmin = 2.8°
rotation method scans h = −47→43
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2001) k = 0→9
Tmin = 0.322, Tmax = 0.522 l = 0→18
29697 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.124 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0948P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
5792 reflections Δρmax = 1.95 e Å3
132 parameters Δρmin = −1.74 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Sn1 0.0000 0.05198 (5) 0.2500 0.01458 (10)
I1 0.10663 (2) 0.06742 (4) 0.33581 (3) 0.02019 (10)
I2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.02079 (11)
I3 0.0000 −0.45465 (5) 0.2500 0.02092 (11)
C1 0.14859 (19) 0.4618 (7) 0.0571 (4) 0.0227 (9)
N2 0.10624 (15) 0.3704 (7) 0.0285 (3) 0.0249 (8)
H2 0.092 (2) 0.260 (10) −0.025 (5) 0.030*
C3 0.08158 (18) 0.4824 (8) 0.0780 (5) 0.0271 (10)
H3 0.0511 0.4521 0.0709 0.033*
N4 0.10586 (15) 0.6417 (7) 0.1383 (3) 0.0251 (8)
H4 0.099 (2) 0.714 (9) 0.178 (5) 0.030*
C5 0.14871 (16) 0.6384 (8) 0.1291 (4) 0.0232 (9)
C6 0.18595 (18) 0.7714 (8) 0.1732 (4) 0.0283 (10)
H6 0.1860 0.8918 0.2210 0.034*
C7 0.22244 (18) 0.7166 (9) 0.1429 (5) 0.0319 (11)
F7 0.26085 (11) 0.8325 (7) 0.1827 (3) 0.0460 (9)
C8 0.22240 (19) 0.5394 (9) 0.0718 (5) 0.0307 (12)
F8 0.26118 (12) 0.5015 (6) 0.0508 (4) 0.0447 (8)
C9 0.18591 (19) 0.4095 (9) 0.0276 (4) 0.0279 (10)
H9 0.1861 0.2901 −0.0205 0.033*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Sn1 0.0230 (2) 0.00982 (18) 0.01224 (19) 0.000 0.00759 (19) 0.000
I1 0.02280 (16) 0.01818 (15) 0.01977 (16) −0.00088 (9) 0.00728 (14) −0.00114 (10)
I2 0.0304 (2) 0.02089 (19) 0.01304 (19) −0.00124 (18) 0.00977 (19) −0.00007 (13)
I3 0.0319 (2) 0.00964 (17) 0.0243 (2) 0.000 0.0134 (2) 0.000
C1 0.029 (3) 0.022 (2) 0.019 (2) 0.0032 (17) 0.0095 (19) −0.0028 (15)
N2 0.027 (2) 0.022 (2) 0.0249 (19) −0.0011 (17) 0.0085 (17) −0.0036 (16)
C3 0.030 (3) 0.029 (2) 0.024 (2) −0.002 (2) 0.012 (2) −0.0046 (19)
N4 0.030 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.025 (2) 0.0035 (17) 0.0123 (18) −0.0023 (16)
C5 0.027 (2) 0.026 (2) 0.0158 (18) 0.0022 (18) 0.0064 (17) −0.0023 (17)
C6 0.035 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.025 (2) −0.003 (2) 0.010 (2) −0.0064 (18)
C7 0.027 (2) 0.034 (3) 0.030 (2) −0.006 (2) 0.004 (2) −0.003 (2)
F7 0.0326 (18) 0.055 (2) 0.048 (2) −0.0165 (17) 0.0106 (16) −0.0163 (19)
C8 0.024 (3) 0.042 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.005 (2) 0.011 (2) −0.002 (2)
F8 0.0299 (18) 0.057 (2) 0.050 (2) 0.0018 (16) 0.0168 (19) −0.0133 (19)
C9 0.034 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.025 (2) 0.001 (2) 0.011 (2) −0.0035 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Sn1—I1 3.1596 (3) C3—H3 0.9500
Sn1—I2 3.1129 (1) N4—C5 1.387 (6)
Sn1—I3 3.1310 (5) N4—H4 0.75 (5)
Sn1—I3i 3.0491 (5) C5—C6 1.385 (7)
Sn1—I1ii 3.1596 (3) C6—C7 1.361 (7)
C1—C9 1.376 (7) C6—H6 0.9500
C1—N2 1.378 (7) C7—F7 1.348 (6)
C1—C5 1.408 (6) C7—C8 1.404 (7)
N2—C3 1.330 (7) C8—F8 1.347 (6)
N2—H2 0.95 (6) C8—C9 1.357 (8)
C3—N4 1.316 (7) C9—H9 0.9500
I1—Sn1—I2 89.374 (6) C1—N2—H2 131 (3)
I1—Sn1—I2ii 90.984 (6) N4—C3—N2 109.6 (5)
I1—Sn1—I1ii 176.539 (14) N4—C3—H3 125.2
I2—Sn1—I2ii 168.154 (12) N2—C3—H3 125.2
I1—Sn1—I3 91.731 (7) C3—N4—C5 109.7 (4)
I2—Sn1—I3 84.077 (6) C3—N4—H4 125 (5)
I1—Sn1—I3i 88.269 (7) C5—N4—H4 124 (5)
I2—Sn1—I3i 95.923 (6) C6—C5—N4 132.3 (4)
I3—Sn1—I3i 180.0 C6—C5—C1 122.3 (5)
I3i—Sn1—I2ii 95.923 (6) N4—C5—C1 105.3 (4)
I2ii—Sn1—I3 84.077 (6) C7—C6—C5 114.9 (4)
I3i—Sn1—I1ii 88.270 (7) C7—C6—H6 122.6
I2—Sn1—I1ii 90.984 (6) C5—C6—H6 122.6
I2ii—Sn1—I1ii 89.374 (6) F7—C7—C6 119.9 (5)
I3—Sn1—I1ii 91.730 (7) F7—C7—C8 117.4 (5)
Sn1iii—I2—Sn1 180.0 C6—C7—C8 122.7 (5)
Sn1iv—I3—Sn1 180.0 F8—C8—C9 121.0 (5)
C9—C1—N2 131.9 (4) F8—C8—C7 116.3 (5)
C9—C1—C5 121.7 (5) C9—C8—C7 122.7 (5)
N2—C1—C5 106.3 (4) C8—C9—C1 115.6 (5)
C3—N2—C1 109.1 (4) C8—C9—H9 122.2
C3—N2—H2 119 (3) C1—C9—H9 122.2
C9—C1—N2—C3 −179.2 (6) C1—C5—C6—C7 −0.8 (7)
C5—C1—N2—C3 0.5 (6) C5—C6—C7—F7 −178.7 (5)
C1—N2—C3—N4 −0.5 (6) C5—C6—C7—C8 0.3 (8)
N2—C3—N4—C5 0.2 (6) F7—C7—C8—F8 0.4 (8)
C3—N4—C5—C6 178.4 (5) C6—C7—C8—F8 −178.7 (5)
C3—N4—C5—C1 0.1 (6) F7—C7—C8—C9 179.2 (5)
C9—C1—C5—C6 0.9 (8) C6—C7—C8—C9 0.2 (9)
N2—C1—C5—C6 −178.9 (4) F8—C8—C9—C1 178.7 (5)
C9—C1—C5—N4 179.4 (5) C7—C8—C9—C1 −0.2 (8)
N2—C1—C5—N4 −0.4 (5) N2—C1—C9—C8 179.4 (5)
N4—C5—C6—C7 −178.9 (5) C5—C1—C9—C8 −0.4 (8)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x, y, −z+1/2; (iii) −x, −y, −z; (iv) x, y−1, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2···I1v 0.95 (6) 2.79 (6) 3.610 (4) 145 (4)
N4—H4···I1i 0.75 (5) 2.88 (6) 3.587 (4) 157 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (v) x, −y, z−1/2.

References

  1. Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.
  3. Bondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441–451.
  4. Bruker (2001). APEX2, SAINT-Plus, SADABS and TWINABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  5. Hao, F., Stoumpos, C. C., Chang, R. P. H. & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2014). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8094–8099. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Keene, T. D., Zimmermann, I., Neels, A., Sereda, O., Hauser, J., Bonin, M., Hursthouse, M. B., Price, D. J. & Decurtins, S. (2010). Dalton Trans. 39, 4937–4950. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Knutson, J. L. & Martin, J. D. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 4699–4705. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  9. Marchioro, A., Teuscher, J., Friedrich, D., Kunst, M., van de Krol, R., Moehl, T., Grätzel, M. & Moser, J.-E. (2014). Nature Photonics, 8, 250–255.
  10. Mercier, N., Poiroux, S., Riou, A. & Batail, P. (2004). Inorg. Chem. 43, 8361–8366. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Mitzi, D. B. (1996). Chem. Mater. 8, pp. 791–800.
  12. Mitzi, D. B. (1999). Progress in Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, edited by K. D. Karlin. New York: Wiley & Sons Inc.
  13. Mitzi, D. B. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1–12.
  14. Mitzi, D. B. (2004). J. Mater. Chem. 14, 2355–2365.
  15. Mitzi, D. B., Dimitrakopoulos, C. D. & Kosbar, L. L. (2001). Chem. Mater. 13, 3728–3740.
  16. Mitzi, D. B., Medeiros, D. R. & Malenfant, R. L. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 41, 2134–2145. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276.
  18. Mouchaham, G., Roques, N., Imaz, I., Duhayon, C. & Sutter, J.-P. (2010). Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 4906–4919.
  19. Pradeesh, K., Rao, K. N. & Prakash, G. V. (2013). J. Appl. Phys. 113, 083523–9.
  20. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Sourisseau, S., Louvain, N., Bi, W., Mercier, N., Rondeau, D., Boucher, F., Buzaré, J.-Y. & Legein, C. (2007). Chem. Mater. 19, 600–607. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Takahashi, Y., Obara, R., Nakagawa, K., Nakano, M., Tokita, J. & Inabe, T. (2007). Chem. Mater. 19, 6312–6316.
  23. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.
  24. Zhengtao, X., Mitzi, D. B., Dimitrakopoulos, C. D. & Maxcy, K. R. (2003b). Inorg. Chem. 42, 2031–2039. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Zhengtao, X., Mitzi, D. B. & Medeiros, D. R. (2003a). Inorg. Chem. 42, 1400–1402. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) 1, 2. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814019151/wm5043sup1.cif

e-70-00178-sup1.cif (1MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 1. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814019151/wm50431sup2.hkl

e-70-00178-1sup2.hkl (203.9KB, hkl)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 2. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814019151/wm50432sup3.hkl

e-70-00178-2sup3.hkl (317.6KB, hkl)

CCDC references: 1021082, 1021083

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES